finnish ict barometer 2007copyright © vtt 20071 bim - experience in finland reykjavik 17.8.2007...
Post on 28-Dec-2015
217 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Finnish ICT Barometer 2007 Copyright © VTT 2007 1
BIM - Experience in Finland
Reykjavik 17.8.2007Heikki Kukko
Finnish ICT Barometer 2007 Copyright © VTT 2007 2
Finnish ICT Barometer 2007• A quick web survey made for Tekes (Finnish Funding
Agency for Technology and Innovation) by VTT (Technical Research Center of Finland)
• Questionnaire open January 2nd - 25th, 2007• Not a statistical sample, rather the upper quartile in
technology adoption; companies interested in R&D
• 86 valid responses (= small sample)• Several replies from one company combined• Significantly incomplete replies removed• Architects, engineers, facility managers, owners,
contractors, material and component industry and others• In analysis: designers = architects and engineers
Finnish ICT Barometer 2007 Copyright © VTT 2007 3
Distribution of responses
14
32
35 5
3
24
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Arc
hite
cts
En
gin
ee
rs
FM
Ow
ne
rs
Co
ntr
act
ors
Ma
teri
al a
nd
com
po
ne
nt
ind
ust
ry
Oth
ers
Respondents by Domain
n=86
Finnish ICT Barometer 2007 Copyright © VTT 2007 4
Basic ICT Tools
ICT Tools
14.5% 13.9% 13.0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Computer Email Internet-connection
Office
Site
Finnish ICT Barometer 2007 Copyright © VTT 2007 5
Use of ICT in Different ActivitiesUse of ICT in Different Activities
24%
22%
17%
53% 49
%
48%
47%
30%
39%
33%
44%
67%
67%
78%
42%
39%
41%
40%
62%
30%
43% 30
%
60%
40%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Acc
ou
ntin
g
Invo
icin
g
Te
chn
ica
ld
esc
rip
tion
s
Te
chn
ica
lca
lcu
latio
ns
Bill
s o
fq
ua
titie
s
Co
ste
stim
atio
n
Sch
ed
ulin
ga
nd
pla
nn
ing
Te
nd
eri
ng
Ma
rkki
no
inti
Re
nta
la
dm
inis
tra
tion
Fa
cilit
ym
an
ag
em
en
t
Oth
er
100%
60-99%
40-59%
1-39%
Manual
Finnish ICT Barometer 2007 Copyright © VTT 2007 6
Use of Design Techniques
Use of Design Techniques Based on the Number of Organizations
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Architects Engineers Designers intotal
Others All in total
Manual drafting
2D CAD (documents)
Product models (BIM)
Finnish ICT Barometer 2007 Copyright © VTT 2007 7
Comparison: Architects & BIM in USA
1-19 employees: ~8% firms using
50+ employees: ~60% firms using
20-49 employees: ~17% firms using
All firms:~10% of firms using
Firm has aquired BIM
Firm using BIMfor billable work
In Finland 93% of the architect firms
responding to thequestionnaire were using BIM in their
projects!
In Finland 93% of the architect firms
responding to thequestionnaire were using BIM in their
projects!
Source: “The Business of Architecture”,American Institute of Architects 2006
Finnish ICT Barometer 2007 Copyright © VTT 2007 8
Volume of the Design Work
Volume of the Design Work
3% 3% 3%
16%9%
64%
77% 75%
74%
75%
33%
20% 22%10%
17%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Architects Engineers Designers intotal
Others All in total
Product models (BIM)
2D CAD (documents)
Manual drafting
Finnish ICT Barometer 2007 Copyright © VTT 2007 9
Utilization of BIM - Designers
24%
7%
12%
22%
26%
36%
38%
28%
26%
23%
18%
25%
13%
54%
60%
48%
24%
15%
10%
10%
8%
8%
13%
20%
8%
5%
9%
17%
10%
12%
9%
12%
24%
49%
49%
46%
62%
67%
46%
55%
67%
81%
15%
5%
5%
6%
12%
10%
10%
5%
5%
5%
8%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
External model as basis
Clash detection
Other design or code checking
Quantity take-off
Cost estimations
Schedule planning
Tendering
Procurements
Logistics planning
Marketing
Spatial management
Facility management
Other use
0%
1-39%
40-59%
60-99%
100%
No need
Utilization of BIM - Designers
Quantity take-off 54%Quantity take-off 54%
Merging models 84%Merging models 84%
Other checking 76%Other checking 76%
External model as basis 63%External model as basis 63%
No need
Finnish ICT Barometer 2007 Copyright © VTT 2007 10
Utilization of BIM - OthersUtilization of BIM - Others
7%
11%
7%
12%
15%
22%
15%
15%
11%
19%
19%
15%
19%
25%
32%
19%
22%
15%
15%
19%
25%
15%
11%
11%
7%
7%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
7%
70%
56%
46%
46%
50%
48%
56%
59%
67%
57%
59%
67%
87%7%
4%
7%
7%
4%
4%
15%
4%
7%
7%
14%
4%
4%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
External model as basis
Clash detection
Other design or code checking
Quantity take-off
Cost estimations
Schedule planning
Tendering
Procurements
Logistics planning
Marketing
Spatial management
Facility management
Other use
0%
1-39%
40-59%
60-99%
100%
No need
Finnish ICT Barometer 2007 Copyright © VTT 2007 11
Development Trend
55%
32%
42%
45%
11%
16%
84%
7%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Manual drafting
2D CAD (documents)
Product models (BIM)
Decreasing
Remaining
Increasing
No opinion
Development Trend
BIM
2D CAD
Drafting
Finnish ICT Barometer 2007 Copyright © VTT 2007 12
Motives for ICT Investments - Designers
7%
15%
20%
15%
9%
20%
33%
22%
11%
7%
15%
22%
24%
24%
39%
22%
35%
22%
28%
7%
20%
63%
54%
22%
39%
22%
9%
9%
86%
39%
15%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Demands from customers
Demands from employees
Maintaining or improvingcompetitiveness
Desire to boost technicalwork
Desire to boostadministrative work
Desire to be a technicalforerunner
Desire to develop newproducts/business
Other motives
Not at all
Only little
Moderately
Much
Heavily
No opinion
Motives for ICT Investments - Designers
96%
96%
83%
Finnish ICT Barometer 2007 Copyright © VTT 2007 13
Motives for ICT Investments - Others
17%
11%
19%
14%
14%
22%
14%
14%
22%
8%
6%
28%
28%
14%
22%
28%
36%
28%
67%
56%
39%
31%
36%
14%
6%
83%
8%
33%
17%
33% 6%
6%
8%
6%
6%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Demands from customers
Demands from employees
Maintaining or improvingcompetitiveness
Desire to boost technicalwork
Desire to boostadministrative work
Desire to be a technicalforerunner
Desire to develop newproducts/business
Other motives
Not at all
Only little
Moderately
Much
Heavily
No opinion
Motives for ICT Investments - Others
94%
92%
94%
Finnish ICT Barometer 2007 Copyright © VTT 2007 14
ICT Use: Problems and Obstacles
Problems in and Obstacles for Increased Use of ICT
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
75%
Co
ntin
uo
us
de
ma
nd
tou
pg
rad
e
No
t co
mp
atib
leso
ftwa
re
Hig
h in
vest
me
nt
cost
s
Incr
ea
sin
ge
du
catio
nre
qu
ire
me
nts
Pre
fere
nce
for
"th
e o
ld w
ay"
of
wo
rkin
g
Ove
rab
un
da
nce
of i
nfo
rma
tion
Diff
icu
ltie
s in
me
asu
rin
gb
en
efit
s
Ma
na
ge
rs d
on
ot h
ave
the
time
for
ICT
Re
du
ced
secu
rity
Ge
ne
ral a
ttitu
de
Ris
k th
at I
CT
lea
ds
toin
effi
cie
ncy
Oth
er
pro
ble
ms
or
ob
sta
cle
s
Insu
ffici
en
tin
tere
st o
f th
em
an
ag
em
en
t
Designers
Others
All
Finnish ICT Barometer 2007 Copyright © VTT 2007 15
ICT Use: Advantages
Advantages of the Increased Use of ICT
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
75%
Imp
rove
d in
form
atio
nm
an
ag
em
en
t an
dco
mm
un
ica
tion
Imp
rove
d p
oss
ibili
ties
tosh
are
info
rma
tion
Imp
rove
d q
ua
lity
of t
he
wo
rk
Wo
rk d
on
e fa
ste
r
Fa
ste
r a
cce
ss a
nd
util
iza
tion
of i
nfo
rma
tion
Po
ssib
ility
to d
eve
lop
ne
wp
rod
uct
s o
r b
usi
ne
ss
Po
ssib
ility
of
tele
wo
rkin
g/te
leco
mm
utin
g
Imp
rove
d fi
na
nci
al c
on
tro
l
Ea
sie
r to
ha
nd
le la
rge
am
ou
nts
of d
ata
Gre
ate
r fle
xib
ility
for
satis
fyin
g c
ust
om
er
ne
ed
s
Ma
kes
the
co
mp
an
y m
ore
attr
act
ive
wh
en
re
cru
itin
gst
aff
Po
ssib
ility
to r
ed
uce
the
sta
ff
Oth
er
be
ne
fits
Designers
Others
All
Finnish ICT Barometer 2007 Copyright © VTT 2007 16
Planned Areas to Increase Use of ICT
85%
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
75%
90%Pr
oduc
t mod
els (B
IM)
Docu
ment
mana
geme
nt
Proje
ct se
rvice
s on t
he In
terne
t
Proje
ct ma
nage
ment
Tech
nical
calcu
lation
s
New
busin
ess m
odels
and
activ
ities
Mana
geme
nt of
facilit
yinf
ormati
on
Mobil
e equ
ipmen
t and
wirel
ess s
ystem
s
2D C
AD
Acco
untin
g sys
tems
Cost
estim
ation
or co
st co
ntrol Vir
tual R
eality
Electr
onic
trade
/ eCo
mmerc
evia
Inter
net
Inform
ation
searc
h via
Intern
et
Othe
rs
No pl
ans t
o inc
rease
ICT
90%
75%
60%
45%
30%
15%
0%
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
75%
90%
Tu
ote
ma
llit
Do
kum
en
ttie
nh
alli
nta
Inte
rne
t-p
roje
ktip
alv
elu
t
Pro
jekt
ien
joh
to
Te
knis
et l
ask
elm
at
Uu
de
tlii
keto
imin
tam
alli
t
Kiin
teis
tötie
toje
nh
alli
nta
La
ng
atto
ma
t yh
teyd
et
2D
CA
D
Kir
jan
pito
/talo
ush
alli
nto
Ku
sta
nn
usl
ask
en
ta, -
oh
jau
s
Vir
tua
alit
od
elli
suu
s
Sä
hkö
ine
nka
up
an
käyn
ti
Tie
do
nh
aku
tieto
verk
ois
ta
Mu
ut
Ei s
uu
nn
itelm
ialis
ää
mis
est
ä
Suunnittelijat
Muut
Kaikki
Designers
Others
All
Management of facility informationNew business models and activities
Technical calculationsProject management
Internet-based project servicesDocument management
BIM
85%
Finnish ICT Barometer 2007 Copyright © VTT 2007 17
Case: Senate Properties
Senate Properties is a government owned enterprise responsible for managing and letting the property assets of the Finnish state.
Since 2001, Senate Properties has carried out a number of pilot projects to develop and study the use of product models. Based on feedback from these, Senate Properties has assessed product model technology to be sufficiently ready for putting to use in ordinary project work.
The company has decided to require models meeting the IFC standard in
its projects as of 1 October 2007.
Finnish ICT Barometer 2007 Copyright © VTT 2007 18
• Senate Properties will draw up detailed modelling guidelines by 1 September 2007. The draft, prepared by VTT, has passed two circulations for comments.
• The guidelines will specify the data content requirements for models to the participants in the project at each stage of the design
• The level of modelling required from 1 October 2007 is just the first step in going over to the broader use of models. The aim is to go over to all-embracing, integrated model-based operations in designing, building, and property servicing and maintenance in the next few years.
top related