financing global health · global health financing is in flux big increases in donor financing for...
Post on 29-May-2020
3 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Financing Global Health -- Trends and Directions Maureen Lewis, PhD Visiting Professor, Georgetown University March 26, 2015
Global health financing is in flux Big increases in donor financing for health 2000-2012 – led by the US
Much of the financing tied to specific diseases
However: The global disease burden is shifting
New players emerging notably philanthropic organizations and the private sector
Developing world is becoming more Middle Income and middle class – that changes the demands, needs and players
Who is spending on developing countries, and on global health?
Foreign direct investment, remittances and private equity investments in developing countries dwarf ODA from 2004
Source: Development Prospects Group, World Bank
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700 FDI
Private debt & portfolio equity
Recorded Remittances
US$ billion
Even LICs relying less on ODA
Source: Leo and Moss, CGD, 2015
Health Overseas Development Assistance (ODA) Trends and Priorities
ODA Disbursements by Sector 2002-2010
Source: Kaiser Family Foundation, Donor Funding for Health in Low- & Middle-Income Countries, 2002-2010
ODA Disbursements for Health & Year-to-Year Percent Change, 2002-2010
10 DONOR FUNDING FOR HEALTH IN LOW- & MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES, 2002–2010
Figure 5:
$4.4 $5.8
$7.1
$9.4
$10.9
$13.5
$15.4
$17.0 $18.4
32%22%
32%
16%
23%14%
10% 8%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
US$ Billions
Annual ODA Disbursements for Health & Year‐to‐Year Percent Change, 2002‐2010
Note: Amounts in gross US$ disbursements. Health ODA combines data from three OECD CRS sub‐sectors: (1) Health; (2) Population Policies/Programs and Reproductive Health (includes HIV/AIDS & STDs); and (3) Other Social Infrastructure and Services ‐ Social Mitigation of HIV/AIDS Source: Analysis of data obtained via online query of the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) Database and Creditor Reporting System (CRS), November 7, 2012.
Figure 6:
United States34.6%
Global Fund16.5%
United Kingdom
6.6%
World Bank5.1%
GAVI3.8%
EU Institutions
2.6%Germany2.6%
Canada2.5%
France2.3%
Japan2.1%
All Other DAC12.1%
All Other Multilaterals
8.8%
Non‐DAC0.4%
United States31.7%
World Bank21.2%
United Kingdom
9.5%
UNFPA5.9%
Netherlands3.5%
France3.0%UNICEF
2.8%
Japan2.7%
Germany2.2%
Norway1.9%
All Other DAC12.8%
All Other Multilaterals
2.8%
2002 2010
Total = $4.4 billion Total = $18.4 billion
Top 10 Donors for Health ODA, 2002 & 2010
Note: Amounts in gross US$ disbursements. Health ODA combines data from three OECD CRS sub‐sectors: (1) Health; (2) Population Policies/Programs and Reproductive Health (includes HIV/AIDS & STDs); and (3) Other Social Infrastructure and Services ‐ Social Mitigation of HIV/AIDS Source: Analysis of data obtained via online query of the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) Database and Creditor Reporting System (CRS), November 7, 2012.
ANNEX 1: FIGURES
Source: Kaiser Family Foundation, Donor Funding for Health in Low- & Middle-Income Countries, 2002-2010
Sub-sectoral breakdown, 2008-09
December 2011, OECD-DAC, www.oecd.org/dac/stats/health
Table 2. Main aid providers and recipients in the health sector 2008-09 average commitments in million USD, constant 2009 prices
Note on Tables 1 and 2. Bill and Melinda Gates refer to 2009 only.
Chart 2. Regional breakdown of aid to health
2008-09, bilateral and multilateral commitments, constant 2009 prices
Chart 3. Sub-sectoral breakdown of aid to health
2008-09, bilateral and multilateral commitments, constant 2009 prices
Chart 4. Total aid flows to health: grants, loans and non-concessional flows 2008-09, bilateral and multilateral commitments, constant 2009 prices
USD million
average 2008-09
United
States
Global
Fund
Bill &
melinda
Gates
Foundation
United
KingdomIDA
Other
donors
All
donors
% of aid to
health to
all
recipientsNigeria 426.5 235.5 45.9 145.8 230.6 119.3 1203.5 6
Tanzania 292.1 242.7 5.7 2.0 46.0 269.3 857.8 4
Kenya 531.5 62.9 24.1 46.6 0.0 78.1 743.3 4
Ethiopia 346.4 138.9 8.2 39.6 20.0 145.2 698.3 3
India 79.5 85.3 119.4 87.8 255.4 168.7 796.2 4
South Africa 535.6 25.2 0.9 15.1 0.0 56.5 633.3 3
Uganda 297.6 100.6 0.0 4.9 10.7 89.4 503.3 2
Mozambique 222.5 9.2 0.0 20.7 22.3 203.4 478.1 2
Zambia 223.9 158.6 8.4 6.2 0.0 78.6 475.8 2
Congo, Dem. Rep. 61.1 83.7 0.0 26.4 92.4 187.1 450.7 2
Pakistan 93.3 10.7 34.0 81.7 37.3 188.9 445.9 2
China 17.9 235.2 46.2 17.4 0.0 123.6 440.4 2
Malawi 56.2 205.1 2.2 24.8 17.0 69.4 374.8 2
Afghanistan 133.1 34.3 0.0 0.0 19.8 169.6 356.9 2
Ghana 38.5 136.9 7.0 39.7 8.8 102.9 333.8 2
Other recipients 3545.8 1404.6 1393.9 626.3 298.1 4754.9 12023.5 58
Total amount 6901.5 3169.6 1695.9 1185.2 1058.4 6804.9 20815.4 100
% of health aid
from all donors33 15 8 6 5 33 100
Africa, South of Sahara
49%
Africa, North of Sahara
1%
South & Central Asia
11%
Far East Asia8%
Middle East2%
America5%
Europe2%
Oceania1%
Other21%
HIV/AIDS control
41%
Reproductive health other
than HIV/AIDS
11%
TB, malaria and other infectious diseases
19%
Other basic health
18%
Health, general
11%
87 % 4% 8%
Grants Concessional loans Non-concessional loans
Source: OECD; Note: bilateral and multilateral commitments, constant 2009 prices
Top 10 Donors for Health ODA, 2002 & 2010
Source: Kaiser Family Foundation, Donor Funding for Health in Low- & Middle-Income Countries, 2002-2010
Changes in types of contributions 1990-2013
Source: IHME DAH Database 2013
ODA for health channel of assistance, 1990-2013
Source: IHME DAH Database
Disease burden shift – implies need for new priorities
Distribution of NCD Deaths in Low and Middle Income
Countries, 2012
19
higher income, and successful preventive and treatment investments over the past few
decades, but better diagnoses and understanding of disease pathogens has contributed as
well.
Figure 4: Distribution of NCD Deaths in Low and Middle Income Countries, 2012
Source: Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (Anonymous2014)
Latin America’s explosion in chronic conditions, cardiovascular disease and diabetes in
particular, is forcing a restructuring and reconsideration of country health care systems
(Montenegro et al. 2011). Through training, engaging community health providers and
providing clinical backup hospitals build capacity and structure clinical management for
chronic conditions. That kind of leadership boosts countries’ abilities to reinvent health care
for the 21st Century and offers a foundation for future changes in response to evolving
circumstances. Latin America is not alone in discovering chronic conditions and the need for
radical change. In India a re-examination of causes of death reveals higher than expected
levels of cancer among young adults in rural areas (Dikshit et al. 2012), a chronic disease
requiring very different forms of intervention and treatment. Aging populations further
contribute to the rise in chronic conditions and particularly poly-chronic illnesses.
Another rising challenge is trauma, often from road accidents. Road traffic incidents (RTI)
represent the leading cause of death of young people ages 15-19 worldwide, and is the 8th
Source: Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (Anonymous 2014)
Non-communicable disease health ODA per DALY by region, 1991–2010
Source: IHME DAH Database 2013 and Global Burden of Disease Study 2010
Foreign direct investment surging in and among developing countries
2013 Total Global FDI Flows
Source: UNCTAD Stat Database, Accessed March 21, 2015
Developing, 778, 54%
Developed, 566, 39%
Transition, 108, 7%
2013 FDI Inflows ($ Billions)
Developing, 454, 32%
Developed, 858, 61%
Transition, 99, 7%
2013 FDI Outflows ($ Billions)
Health Services Inward FDI1
Source: UNCTAD Stat Database, as published in Zimny, Zbigniew. 2011. “Foreign Direct Investment in Health Services Background Paper Prepared for UNCTAD”
1,053
5,887
0
7,339
1990 2009
FDI Inward Stock in Health Services ($USD millions)
Developed Developing
2,635
1,461
572
1,489
Developed Developing
2008-102 FDI in Health Services ($USD millions)
M&A Greenfield
1: Also includes social services such as job training, vocational and rehabilitation services, child-care services, residential care and individual and family social services 2: Annual Average
Greenfield Global FDI last 24 months
Source: FDI Markets pulled February 15, 2015
Pharmaceuticals, $16,262
Biotechnology, $5,524
Medical Devices, $4,967
Healthcare, $2,613
Capital Expenditures US$
398
116
283
95
Pharmaceuticals
Biotechnology
Medical Devices
Healthcare
# of Projects
Company Company Overview Example Outward FDI
Malaysian-based healthcare provider that is the 2nd largest listed healthcare operator in the world by market cap, operates over 7k beds in 38 hospitals across 10 countries
March 2015 – IHH acquired 51% stake in India’s Continental Hospitals for $45.5M through its subsidiary firm Gleaneagles Development
Publicly listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange after an IPO in 2012, Fosun Pharma is one of the top 5 domestic pharmaceutical companies in PRC by revenue
April 2014 – China hospital chain Chindex, a Maryland-based healthcare company, accepted buyout offer from Shanghai Fosun Pharma and PE firm TPG Capital for $466M
Fortis is an Indian healthcare provider currently operating in India, Singapore, Dubai, Mauritius and Sri Lanka with 55 healthcare facilities, approx. 10k beds and 270 diagnostic centers
August 2012 - Becomes 1st Indian hospital chain with Greenfield Hospital abroad with the launch of Fortis Colorectal Hospital in Singapore
Emerging Market Examples of Outward Health FDI
Source: Company Websites, Healthcare Business International, China Business Review, Fortis Press Release
Examples of Different Types of FDI
Source: Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Company websites,
Greenfield
Capital Acquisition
Joint Venture
Equity Acquisition
Gleneagles Hong Kong Hospital, a 500-bed facility opening in 2016, is a joint venture between Parkway Pantai, NWS Holdings Limited, and the University of Hong Kong
Seattle-based Columbia Pacific Management is launching Columbia China and plans to build two-250 bed hospitals with an investment of up to $200M in China
TPG Capital, a global private investment firm, announced in 2015 that they will buy a “significant minority stake” in Indian Hospital operator Manipal Health Enterprises for $145.86 million
Columbia Asia, owned by Columbia Pacific Management, acquired Gleni International hospital (238 beds) in Medan, Indonesia in 2008
Remittances: rapid growth in household discretionary spending for health care
Remittances permit higher household health care expenditures
Comparing 46 countries, higher remittances are associated with greater access to healthcare treatment
Across 12 African countries households dedicate 5-12% of remittances received from outside Africa to healthcare
In Kwa-Zulu Natal, South Africa remittances improved poorer household’s access to quality (private) medical care
Guatemalan HHs receiving internal remittances spend 22 % more on health than do non- remittance households
Source: Ratha, D. (Ed.). (2011). Leveraging migration for Africa: remittances, skills, and investments. World Bank; Adams, R. 2005. "Remittances, household expenditure and investment in Guatemala." World Bank PRWP; Drabo, A., and C. Ebeke. "Remittances, public health spending and foreign aid in the access to health care services in developing countries." (2010)
In Mexico healthcare expenditures rise in response to remittance earnings
With each peso rise in international remittances primary healthcare expenditures rise $.06 - $.09 hospitalization expenditures rise $ .12 - $ .20
Remittances increase household health spending 3x more than do other sources of income
Households receive an increase in remittances with a health crisis
Remittances play an important role in financing household catastrophic care
Source: Amuedo-Dorantes, C., T.Sainz, and S. Pozo. 2007. Remittances and healthcare expenditure patterns of populations in origin communities: evidence from Mexico (Working Paper ITD 25). BID-INTAL; Knaul, F. et al . 2006.. Evidence is good for your health system: policy reform to remedy catastrophic and impoverishing health spending in Mexico. The Lancet, 368(9549), 1828-1841.
Remittances induce shift to the private sector
Elasticity of access to health care services with respect to remittances positive for total and private health care
Remittances have no impact on access to public health care services.
Remittances improve overall access to health services inducing a “sectorial glide” from the public to private sector.
Remittances reduce need to finance hospital treatment with debt
Households with nuclear family in the US did not increase their debts due to health shocks.
This is consistent with remittances responding to households’ demand for financing emergencies, making them less reliant on debt financing.
Source: Ambrosius, C., & Cuecuecha, A. (2013). Are remittances a substitute for credit? World Development, 46, 143-152.
Remittances expected to growth rapidly
Ratha et al project rapid growth in remittances over the next decade
Implies strong funding for health care in remittance recipient countries, for both Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Conclusions
The future of global health spending Health ODA levels benefited from significant increases between 2000 and 2012 but higher growth unlikely
HIV/AIDS triggered much of increased ODA spending As the largest single donor US allocations were linked to PEPFAR
Focus of historical spending largely communicable diseases but that is shifting, will ODA respond?
Will OECD spending continue even if there is growth in OECD? Is there willingness to spend more on ODA?
Middle and Low Income governments are spending more
New players likely to dominate the future of health care spending
Demand coming from: rising incomes,
urbanization,
growing remittance earnings,
citizen preferences for quality diagnosis and treatment, including inpatient care
Philanthropy a major source of funding
Private sector will continue to expand – both domestically and globally
FDI will respond if governments and domestic investment does not
Thank you
top related