euc3158 vmware zimbra: better than exchange

Post on 25-Feb-2016

72 Views

Category:

Documents

5 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

EUC3158 VMware Zimbra: Better than Exchange . Name, Title, Company. Disclaimer. This session may contain product features that are currently under development. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

EUC3158VMware Zimbra: Better than Exchange

Name, Title, Company

2

Disclaimer

This session may contain product features that are currently under development.

This session/overview of the new technology represents no commitment from VMware to deliver these features in any generally available product.

Features are subject to change, and must not be included in contracts, purchase orders, or sales agreements of any kind.

Technical feasibility and market demand will affect final delivery.

Pricing and packaging for any new technologies or features discussed or presented have not been determined.

3

Agenda Overview of VMware Zimbra Building ITaaS with vSphere Zimbra Performance and Scalability Zimbra User Experience Key Takeaways

4

Key Takeaway's

1. Plug and Play with todays cloud infrastructure of choice, VMware vSphere.

2. Designed for massive scalability and mailboxes without boundaries.

3. Policy driven administration and extensibility with 3rd Party Applications and APIs.

5

Cloud

Journey to IT Transformation – Accelerate and Amplify

Infrastructure focus Application focus Business focus

Business Production IT as a Service

Virtualization

Low Governance

High Governance

Enterprise Hybrid Cloud

IT Production

6

Building ITaaS with Zimbra

VirtualizationOperations

User ExperienceAnywhere Access

ApplicationCloud Scalability

HardwareIndependence

7

Zimbra Web Client

Zimbra Desktop

SOAP

VMware Zimbra 7 Product Overview

Zimbra Server

ExchangeServer

LDAP, WebDAV

Active Directory

Standards ClientsApple Desktop

POP, IMAP, CardDAV, CalDAV

MS Outlook

MAPI

BES, Browser

BlackBerry

ActiveSync, Mobile Browser

iPhone

Android WindowsTablets

8

Hardware Independence

VirtualizationOperations

User ExperienceAnywhere Access

ApplicationCloud Scalability

HardwareIndependence

9

Flexible Storage Options

Disks• Fiber

channel• SATA• SAS• SSD

Connectivity• iSCSI• NFS• Fiber

Channel• Direct

Types• SAN• NAS• DAS• SOS*• VSA**

* Scale Out Storage, **Virtual Storage Appliance

10

Flexible Storage Capabilities

No limitations on storage technology

No limitations on snapshot, replication, HA technologyNo limitations on de-duplication or auto-tiering technologyOnly recommendations for configuration and performance

11

Zimbra + vSphere Solves IT Ops

VirtualizationOperations

User ExperienceAnywhere Access

ApplicationCloud Scalability

HardwareIndependence

12

Integrated High Availability with vSphere

VMware HA, Application Monitoring API• Monitors Critical Zimbra Services

• Sends heartbeat every 15 seconds

Protects all mail components• MBS, MTA, LDAP, Proxy, Archive, +3rd Party

VMware ESX VMware ESX VMware ESXi

Resource Pool

Failed Server Operating ServerOperating Server

Critical Zimbra ServicesX

13

High Availability Setup

Step 1: start heartbeat on Zimbra VM

/opt/zimbra/libexec/vmware-heartbeat start

Step 3: enable app monitoring in vSphere Client

/etc/init.d/zimbra_heartbeat

Step 2 : add heartbeat to startup scripts

14

Integrated Business Continuity with vSphere

Choose your RPO• ≥15 minutes – SRM with Host Based Replication

• < 15 minutes – SRM with 3rd party HW/SW replication

Protects all mail components• MBS, MTA, LDAP, Proxy, Archive, +3rd Party

Test failover without production interruption

VMware vSphere

Site RecoveryManager

Site A (Primary)

Site B (Recovery)Servers

Z MTA

Z MBS

Z Proxy

Z LDAP

15

Fine to Coarse Grain Backups with vSphere

Item Level• End user, Self service recovery

• Admin enabled/disabled

Mailbox Level• D2D based built into Zimbra

• No 3rd party agents or software required

• Use 3rd party to vault to external media

VM Level• Snapshot backups using VMware Data Recovery

• 3rd party HW/SW solutions using vStorage APIs

• Crash consistency built into Zimbra

16

Zimbra Application Architecture

VirtualizationOperations

User ExperienceAnywhere Access

ApplicationCloud Scalability

HardwareIndependence

17

3Rd PartyStorage System

Zimbra Primary DBIndexZimbra Journaling

Mailbox Server (MBS) Architecture – Cloud Scale

Zimbra Collaboration Server

Message and File Store API Meta DataSearchDatabaseReliability

Zimbra Secondary

HSM

Written in Java for high transactional throughput• Multiplex within single process, avoid process swapping and IPC• Low CPU utilization at scale

Efficient storage architecture to support Large (>30GB) mailboxes

18

Zimbra with NetApp NFS on vSphere

10K user workload• 90 percent SOAP users, 10 percent IMAP users• 21 receive/hour, 7 send/hour (per user)• 120KB average message size• 25% messages with 500KB attachment• 100% Concurrency

Primary Secondary Journal Index DB

Capacity 10-20% 80-90% Primary ÷ 15 Primary × 35%

5MB per mbx

IOPS/user 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.06(w/ attachments)

0.04

IO Pattern Write/Read Read/Write Write Write/Read Read/Write

Workload Requirements• 60-70% write IO for MBS• 1700 IOPS total for MBS• 200 IOPS total for MTA server

Detailed MBS Storage Profile

19

Scale Out on vSphere 5

*Dell R910, 4 socket x 8 core x 2.27 GHz Xeon X7350 (Nehalem-EX), 256 GB

Result• 21% host CPU utilization @ 32K users.

• Hypothesis: can double users per VM from 4K – 8K

20

4K – 8K Performance Comparison

Number of vCPUs

Memory size (GB)

Number of Users

Sendmail latency (ms)

CPU utilization

(usr/sys/wait)

4 32 4,000 112.5 18.8/3.4/9.1

8 64 8,000 119.0 17.7/3.2/9.4

4 32 8,000 167.3 38.6/6.6/20.8

Result• Same compute resource footprint, double the users

• Well within performance tolerance levels

21

Virtual vs. Native Performance Comparison

Number of CPUs Number of Users Virtual/Native Sendmail latency (ms)

CPU utilization(usr/sys/wait)

4 4,000 Virtual 112.5 18.8/3.4/9.1

4 4,000 Native 112 17.5/3.8/11

8 8,000 Virtual 119 17.7/3.2/9.4

8 8,000 Native 115 20.3/3.4/9.7

Number of vCPUs Number of users RHEL version % of Native Sendmail latency (ms)

8 8,000 RHEL 5 82% 139

8 8,000 RHEL 6 97% 119

Result• 97% of Native performance!!

Guest OS improvements• Dynamic hugepages allocated to applications (vs. fixed)• Tickless timer with on demand interrupts (vs. periodic query)

22

Zimbra vs. Exchange: Compute Resources

23

Admin and User Experience

VirtualizationOperations

User ExperienceAnywhere Access

ApplicationCloud Scalability

HardwareIndependence

24

Simple Provisioning on VMware vSphere

NEW* Multi-instance Appliance Install to Inbox in minutes No OS installation or administration

Demo

25

Web Administration

ITaaS model• Web Administration – multi-platform multi-browser

• Secure by design – application logging and monitoring

• Class of service – manage services and configuration

• Delegated Administrative model• Multi-tenant / multi-domain by design

External LDAP / AD integration• GAL per domain

• SSO authentication ( SPNEGO/Kerberos, SAML, Oauth) per domain

Compliance• Zimbra Archiving and Discovery

• Legal Hold and Cross Mailbox Search

• Single Instance Storage Archive or Separate Server/Storage

Demo

26

Web Client Experience

Multi-platform / Multi-browser / Multi-Device• Location and device independent

• AJAX / HTML5 (lead with the browser)

• Zimlets

Large Mailboxes• Search

• Backend architecture (metadata and blob store separation)

• >30GB mailboxes

Demo

27

Key Takeaway's

1. Plug and Play with todays cloud infrastructure of choice, VMware vSphere.

2. Designed for massive scalability and mailboxes without boundaries.

3. Policy driven administration and extensibility with 3rd Party Applications and APIs.

28

Q&A

top related