environmental quality incentives program funding pools leo preston, lower willamette basin kevin...

Environmental Quality Incentives Program Funding Pools

Leo Preston, Lower Willamette BasinKevin Conroy, High Desert Basin

County-Level Funding Pools

• Concept presented to OTAC in November, 2009

• Local work group meetings held throughout summer

• Funding pools due August 31

Funding Pool Criteria

• Focused on the primary resource problem and the one or two contributing resource concerns

• The primary resource problem is area-wide, identifying cumulative off-site effects

• Scope and extend of the problem defined in a concise statement (acres, percent, temperature, etc.)

Solution

• Scope and extent of the area needing treatment to resolve the problem to the desired condition.

• Identified suite of practices needed to meet quality criteria for the identified resource problem.

Outcome

• Specific – Concise statement, clear to anyone with a basic knowledge of natural resources.

• Measurable – Defined in terms of percentages, improvements in rating indexes, etc. The method of documenting outcomes is specified.

• Attainable – Estimated participation rates and funding levels are reasonable given recent allocations and participation rates.

• Relevant – The outcome corresponds to the to the identified resource problem.

• Time Bound – The identified resource problem can be resolved to quality criteria in 3-5 years.

HDB- Harney-Grazed Range – Invasive Plant Species

• Problem

Deterioration in range health resulting from Medusahead infestations. Lack of awareness and limited/haphazard treatment on private lands.

• Solution

Engage a significant portion (25%)of the private land operators including key community members in a process designed to demonstrate the key principles of Integrated Pest Management for the management and control of Medusahead.

• Outcome

Prevent further spread of Medusahead.

Stayton Sublimity GWMA

Stayton Sublimity GWMA

• Problem - Ground Water recharge not keeping up with draw down – 27,000 acres irrigated (7000 acres already treated) - Municipal and Rural wells going dry - GWMA from Restricted to Critical - Irrigation Water cut off from high value crops if area is designated critical

Stayton Sublimity GWMA

• Solution - In five years treat 10,000 acres with more efficient irrigation systems and management - 35- 50% average reduction in water usage - Installation of low pressure system shows immediate impact on rural well water availability

Stayton Sublimity GWMA

• Outcome - Draw down does not exceed recharge - Municipal and rural wells don’t go dry - GWMA does not go from restricted to critical - High value crops can continue to support the local economy

Statewide Resource Concerns

1. NEW PROCESS: OTAC needs to recommend Statewide Resource Concerns to the state conservationist for FY11

2. County-level funding pools will be categorized under statewide resource concerns along as a part of new national budget process

3. Basins will be authorized to use up to a percentage of EQIP funds for on-farm projects tied to top resource concerns identified by OTAC and selected by the basin

Example of a Potential Basin Pool

• John Day/Umatilla – CRP Transition– Soil Erosion – Maintain Permanent Cover– Treat ~8.6 k Acres / year• Save 17k Tons of Soil

Proposed Process

1. NRCS will analyze submitted funding pools by September 15

2. NRCS will provide analysis to OTAC subcommittee for development of statewide concerns

3. NRCS will distribute resource concern list to full OTAC electronically for concurrence prior to October 1.

4. In addition to their locally identified funding pools, Basin Team Leaders will have the option of developing basin-wide funding pools that correlate with the top 3-4 resource concerns recommended by OTAC.

Proposed Process

• NRCS will complete an initial analysis of the resource concerns identified in the state funding pools by September 15.

• NRCS will present these findings to a sub-committee of OTAC to use in the development of a recommendation for state-wide resource concerns

Discussion

1. Questions?2. Approval of process to provide state resource

concern recommendations