dr. grace nickerson, dissertation, dr. william allan kritsonis, dissertation chair
Post on 09-Apr-2018
226 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 1/112
Factors that Impact the Academic Achievement of Minority Students: A Comparison Among
Asian American, African American, and Hispanic Students in Large Urban School Districts
A Dissertation
by
Grace Thomas Nickerson
Submitted to the Graduate SchoolPrairie View A & M University
in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
December 2008
Major Subject: Educational Leadership
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 2/112
Factors that Impact the Academic Achievement of Minority Students: A Comparison Among
Asian American, African American, and Hispanic Students in Large Urban School Districts
A Dissertation by
Grace Thomas Nickerson
Approved as to style and content by:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis Dr. Douglas Hermond(Dissertation Chair) (Member)
____________________________ ______________________________
Dr. David Herrington Dr. Camille Gibson(Member) (Member)
____________________________ _________________________________
Dr. Lucian Yates, III Dr. William H. Parker
Dean, The Whitlowe R. Green Dean, Graduate School
College of Education
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 3/112
Abstract
Factors that Impact the Academic Achievement of Minority Students: A Comparison Among
Asian American, African American, and Hispanic Students in Large Urban School Districts
(December 2008)
Grace Thomas Nickerson: B.A. University of Texas at Austin
M.Ed. Prairie View A & M University
Dissertation Chair: William Allan Kritsonis, Ph.D.
The purpose of the study was to determine the differences among Asian American,
African American and Hispanic students with respect to parental involvement, frequency of
individual study modes, frequency of group study modes, time spent on homework.
The study aimed to answer the following research questions:
1. How do Asian American, Hispanic, and African American students at selected high
schools compare with respect to self-reported frequency of individual study modes,
frequency of group study modes, time spent doing homework, and parental
involvement?
2. What are the differences when studying English, Math, Science and Social Studies
among Asian American, Hispanic, and African American students with respect to
frequency of individual study modes, frequency of group study modes, time spent
doing homework?
i
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 4/112
The study examined the factors that may have contributed to the academic achievement
of minority students in large urban school districts. The factors included are parental
involvement, frequency of individual study modes, frequency of group study modes, and time
spent on homework.
Data for the study were collected by using a questionnaire instrument to gain insight into
how the above factors may contribute to minority students’ academic success. The participants of
the study were Asian American, African American, and Hispanic students at five high schools
located in southeast Texas. The sample for this study was approximately 713 male and female
high school seniors of Asian American, African American, and Hispanic origin. The results of
the questionnaire were compared with the data from the students’ Exit-Level TAKS passing
rates. To determine which factors may contribute to or hinder the academic achievement of each
minority group. The statistical analysis method of One-Way ANOVA was applied to examine
the factors that may be associated with academic achievement among minority students.
The results in the study determined that there are no statistically significant differences in
the parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of individual study modes, and
frequency of group study modes among the minority groups, except in the parental involvement
and time spent on homework of Hispanic and African American students. According to the
results of the study, educational leaders can modify policies and standards that are created and
implemented on the state and district levels to accommodate all students. Also, standardized tests
that are used to measure academic achievement can be modified to adequately test all students of
every race and background. Lastly, educational leaders should restructure standardized tests to
ii
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 5/112
prevent educators and districts from teaching students how to take a standardized test, and
instead, allow students to gain an in depth knowledge of all subject areas.
iii
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 6/112
Dedication
I would like to dedicate my research to all students that are struggling to obtain a fruitful
life by way of a sometimes unyielding educational system. There are educators that are
discovering and fighting for ways to enhance the academic achievement among all students to
ensure that the dreams and goals of all children are realized.
I would also like to dedicate my research to all educators that fight for the rights of all
students and their academic achievement. I want to encourage them to continue to fight for
academic achievement for all students, and remember the true reason for education—the
students.
iv
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 7/112
Acknowledgements
I would like to acknowledge the hard work and endless support of my dissertation chair,
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis. You were always there when I needed you and provided avenues
for me to travel to reach my goals. I am eternally grateful. In addition, I would like to
acknowledge Dr. David Herrington and Dr. Douglas Hermond for sharing their expertise in
statistics. Without the two of you, my study would be incomplete. Thanks Dr. Camille Gibson
for serving on my committee as outside member from the College of Juvenile Justice and
Psychology at PV. A special thanks Dr. Mary Alice Kritsonis for your professional expertise.
To my parents, Dr. and Mrs. Carrol and Linda Thomas, your unwavering love and
support guided me to reach this level in my life and career. I will forever admire, love, and
appreciate all that you are, what you have made me, and the legacy that you have begun. The
inspiration that I received throughout my life has come from my sister, Dr. Carol Thomas. I have
always looked up to you and aspired to be as great as you. You have never let me down—Thank
you!
My God-send, my husband, Jeff Nickerson. You have been with me throughout this
entire doctoral journey. Your patience, assistance, humor and unconditional love have kept me
focused and emotionally balanced. I am so blessed to have you in my life.
Lastly, my motivation towards my research and completion is Lyndon Carol Jeannie
Nickerson. The love I have for you, the life and dreams that I want for you to have and
accomplish has been a driving force in my life and studies. Lyndon, I hope that this journey that I
have endured enhances and impacts your life and your thirst for knowledge in a profound
manner.
v
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 8/112
Table of Contents
Page
Abstract.............................................................................................................................................i
Dedication.......................................................................................................................................iv
Acknowledgements..........................................................................................................................v
Table of Contents............................................................................................................................vi
List of Tables..................................................................................................................................ix
Chapter I. Introduction ....................................................................................................................1
Background of the Problem.................................................................................................3
Statement of the Problem.....................................................................................................4
Research Questions .............................................................................................................4
Null Hypotheses ..................................................................................................................5
Purpose of the Study ...........................................................................................................6
Significance of the Study.....................................................................................................6
Assumptions ........................................................................................................................7
Limitations of the Study ......................................................................................................8
Definition of Terms .............................................................................................................8
Organization of Study........................................................................................................10
Chapter II. Review of Literature ...................................................................................................11
The Asian Migration .........................................................................................................15
The Model Minority...........................................................................................................16
vi
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 9/112
The Social Factors that Impact Academic Achievement of African American
Students ........................................................................................................................20
The Social Factors that Impact Academic Achievement of Hispanic
Students ........................................................................................................................22
American Education vs. Asian Education.........................................................................24
Parental Involvement.........................................................................................................28
Time Spent on Homework.................................................................................................34
Frequency of Individual Study Modes and Frequency of Group Study Modes. ...............38
Summary.......................................................................................................................40
Chapter III. Methodology..............................................................................................................42
Research Questions............................................................................................................43
Hypotheses.........................................................................................................................43
Research Methodology......................................................................................................44
Research Design.................................................................................................................45
Subjects of the Study.........................................................................................................46
Instrumentation .................................................................................................................47
Validity..............................................................................................................................48
Reliability………………………………………………………………….......................48
Procedure...........................................................................................................................49
Data Collection and Recording .........................................................................................50
Data Analysis.....................................................................................................................50
Summary…………………………………………………………………........................51
vii
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 10/112
Chapter IV. Analysis of Data………………………………………….........................................52
Findings..............................................................................................................................55
Summary............................................................................................................................67
Chapter V. Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations ........................................................71
Summary…………………………………………………………………........................71
Summary of Findings...………………………………………………..............................72
Discussion………………………………………………………………..........................75
Recommendations………………………………………………………..........................76
Recommendations for Further Study...…...…...…………………....................................77
Conclusion……………………………………………………………….........................78
References......................................................................................................................................80
Appendix A School District Permission Letters............................................................................88
Appendix B IRB Approval Letter .................................................................................................90
Appendix C Questionnaire Questions............................................................................................93
Appendix D Human Participant Protections Education for Research
Completion Certificate...................................................................................................................98
Vita...............................................................................................................................................100
viii
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 11/112
List of Tables
Table...........................................................................................................................................Page
4.0 2006 – 2007 Demographics Percentages of the Campuses Involved
in the Study.........................................................................................................52
4.1 2007 Exit-Level TAKS Passing Percentages for Each Campus
Involved in the Study .........................................................................................56
4.2 Descriptive Statistics (Compare Means) on Parental Involvement,
Time Spent on Homework, Frequency of Individual Study Modes,
and Frequency of Group Study Modes based Ethnicity and Gender..................57
4.3 One-Way ANOVA On Parental Involvement, Time Spent on
Homework, Frequency of Individual Study Modes, and Frequency
Group Study Modes based on Ethnicity and Gender..........................................58
4.4 One-Way ANOVA (Mean Difference) on Parental Involvement and
Time Spent on Homework based on Ethnicity ..................................................59
4.5 One-Way ANOVA and Compare Means of Parental Involvement
among Ethnic Groups Questionnaire..................................................................60
4.6 One-ANOVA and Compare Means of Time Spent on Homework
among Ethnic Groups Questionnaire .................................................................63
4.7 One-ANOVA and Compare Means of Frequency of Individual Study
Modes among Ethnic Groups Questionnaire .....................................................65
4.8 One-ANOVA and Compare Means of Frequency of Group Study
Modes among Ethnic Groups Questionnaire.....................................................66
ix
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 12/112
Chapter I
Introduction
The educational gap of minorities has been one of the major causes of educational reform
in the United States. Minorities immigrating to the United States come from all areas of the
world, especially from those countries in close proximity or that have historical ties such as
Africa, Mexico, and Asia. A common challenge among these minority groups has been the
struggle to have equal access to educational opportunities in a desegregated environment. From
those experiences, these minorities have deemed getting an education of paramount importance
(Le, 2001). There continues to be a disparity among these minority groups and their White
counterparts causing education to be in constant change and in search for methods of
improvement. Environmental factors play a big part in closing the gap among minorities in
education. There has been a shift in the attitude of both children and parents. Parental
involvement has also decreased, and schools have lost a lot of control in discipline and
instruction to name a few (Wu, 2005).
Asian American students tend to out perform other minorities. The factors that contribute
to this occurrence are debatable. The cultural diversity in American education contributes to the
academic performance of minority students (Chubb, 2002). This occurs because of the various
traditions, values and belief systems that are present in each minority group. Currently in
schools, there are racial separation patterns that seem to reinforce the perception that racial
identity and student performance are linked. This pattern sends a message that because of their
race, they can or cannot do certain things within the school (Noguera, 1999). The study sought to
determine the differences among the Asian American, Hispanic, and African American students
1
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 13/112
2
with respect to self-reported parental involvement, frequency of individual study modes,
frequency of group study modes, and time spent on homework. By looking at these factors,
educational leaders may gain insight on the variance in the academic achievement among those
minority groups.
The study focused on Asian American, Hispanic, and African American students because
they are the most prominent minority groups in the American educational system. Although,
there are many subgroups within each minority group, the study focuses on each minority group
as a whole because the measure of success used in the study focuses on the minority groups as
whole groups. Parental involvement is important to study as an effect on achievement. Students
whose parents were involved in their educational career noted they knew what courses to take to
become eligible for any college. However, students that were unaware of what courses to take to
be eligible for college had very little to no parental involvement (Norguera, 1999). Blacks and
Hispanics are much less likely than Whites to graduate from high school, or acquire a college or
advanced degree (Chubb, 2002). This may due to the lack to parental involvement in the
students’ educational career.
Time spent on homework is another factor investigated in the study. Time spent on
homework is related to academic achievement (Yan, 2005). Minority students and students of
low-economic subgroups have been found to put little effort into schoolwork compared to other
groups (Farkas, 2003). Some minority students, such as Asian American, endure parental-
imposed curfews in terms of time spent on the telephone and going out on the weekends. These
curfews are in place to allow time for academics (Elmasry, 2005).
Frequency of study modes (individual study and group study) are factors of academic
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 14/112
3
achievement because it describes how the student studied and prepared for their academic
pursuits. The study modes used by students may reflect the students’ culture. If one culture
believes in a single person making way for the family, then that person may study by
him/herself. If the culture perpetuates family togetherness and encouragement, then group study
is more likely. This is typical of the Asian culture. Although students may study in groups, not
all groups are productive. Ability grouping, which can be proposed by the teacher,
disproportionately and unfairly places ethnic groups at a disadvantage by reducing their
opportunities to learn. The best study mode used is when students study in groups. Grouping
based on ability is not productive for ethnic cultures (Farkas, 2003).
To bridge the academic gap among minorities, it is important to note the differences
among the minority groups with respect to parental involvement, time spent on homework,
frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes. However,
understanding the culture of the minority groups is the key to understanding what needs to be
done to make students successful.
Background of the Problem
Performance levels among minority groups in the United States are in sharp contrast
across all academic subjects. Asian Americans perform higher than any other minority group and
sometimes above their White counterparts (Malone, 2004). Bridging the achievement gap among
the minority groups and the majority is of great concern in the United States. Determining the
differences among the minority groups is a step toward understanding possible attributes of
disparities in performance levels by ethnicity.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 15/112
4
Statement of the Problem
Becoming a second-rate economic power house will be the destiny of America unless it
can match the educational performance of its rivals abroad in Asia (Staples, 2005). UNICEF
conducted a study on the effectiveness of educational systems in the world. The United States
ranked 18 out of 24 nations evaluated, with Asian nations ranking in the top three (Wu, 2005).
Asian American students partake in the same American education as their African American and
Hispanic counterparts. There is an achievement gap between Asian Americans, African
Americans, Hispanics and their White counterparts. Discovering the differences among the
minority groups with respect to parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of
individual study modes, and the frequency of group study modes will give educational leaders
insight on how to decrease the academic achievement gap. Therefore, the study describes
regional differences among Asian American, Hispanic, and African American students with
respect to self-reported parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of individual
study modes, and frequency group study modes. The Trends in International Mathematics and
Science Study have shown that there are vast differences in these areas by ethnicity (Wu, 2005).
Discovering the differences among the minority groups with respect to the factors will give
educational leaders in the United States insight on how to solve American educational problems
in particular, closing the achievement gap.
Research Questions
The study answers the following questions:
1. How do Asian American, Hispanic, and African American students at selected high
schools compare with respect to self-reported parental involvement, time spent on
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 16/112
5
homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study
modes?
2. What are the differences when studying English, Mathematics, Science and Social
Studies among Asian American, Hispanic, and African American students with
respect to self-reported parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency
of individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes?
Null Hypotheses
The Null Hypotheses in the study refer to Research questions 1 and 2.
Ho1 – There are no statistically significant differences among Asian American, Hispanic, and
African American students with respect to self-reported parental involvement, time spent
on English homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group
study modes.
(Refers to Research Question 1 and 2)
Ho2 - There are no statistically significant differences among Asian American, Hispanic, and
African American students with respect to self-reported parental involvement, time spent
on Mathematics homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group
study modes.
(Refers to Research Question 1 and 2)
Ho3 - There are no statistically significant differences among Asian American, Hispanic, and
African American students with respect to self-reported parental involvement, time spent
on Science homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group
study modes.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 17/112
6
(Refers to Research Question 1 and 2)
Ho4 - There are no statistically significant differences among Asian American, Hispanic, and
African American students with respect to self-reported parental involvement, time spent
on Social Studies homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of
group study modes.
(Refers to Research Question 1 and 2)
Purpose of the Study
The purpose of the study is to determine the differences among Asian American,
Hispanic, and African American students with respect to self-reported parental involvement,
time spent on homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency group study
modes. Discovering what may contribute to the disparities in performance between Asian
American, Hispanic, and African American students may assist educational leaders in finding
ways to improve their educational performance. Until a solution has been found to close the
achievement gap on a macro level between Asian American, African American, and Hispanic
students, the gap will continue to exist.
Significance of the Study
Bridging the achievement gap between Asian American, African American, and Hispanic
students has been a well discussed topic within America. Knowledge gained in the study will
identify factors that must be considered in order to effectively bridge the achievement gap
between Asian American, African American, and Hispanic students; thus allowing all students to
adopt the most helpful strategies for studying to result in optimal levels of learning. Students
learning at successful, comparable levels will improve America’s output of productive,
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 18/112
7
marketable individuals. The most important educational challenge for the U.S. is closing the
achievement gaps among the nation’s racial and ethnic groups (Crawford, 2002). The differences
found in the study are important for educational leaders to be knowledgeable of to better serve all
students. Being aware of student behaviors with regard to studying and parental involvement will
enhance educational leaders’ ability to educate minority students and to close the existing
academic achievement gap despite macro influences.
Assumptions
The following assumptions were made:
1. Academic success among minority students is related parental involvement.
2. The frequency of individual study modes, frequency of group study modes, and
time spent on homework will not be as salient as parental involvement.
3. Asian Americans spend more time studying in groups than African American and
Hispanic students.
4. Parental involvement in educational matters is lacking in the African American and
Hispanic communities.
5. The culture and social beliefs of Asian Americans, African Americans, and
Hispanics, gives insight into the educational performance levels of Asian American,
African American, and Hispanic students.
6. Students’ self-reports of Asian American, African American and Hispanic students
are fairly accurate.
7. The method of study performed by students occurs in study groups.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 19/112
8
Limitations of the Study
1. A possible limitation may exist in the difference of cultures and traditions within
each minority group.
2. Socio-economic status may also be a factor among minority groups regarding
education.
3. Racially and culturally diverse schools may yield different results than
predominately Asian American, African American, and Hispanic schools.
4. The study is limited to urban school districts in Texas.
5. The size of the ethnic groups present in the participating high schools may give
disproportionate results.
6. There may be a difference in academic achievement in minority students in rural
school districts.
7. There may be a difference in the academic achievement in the subgroups of each
minority group involved in the study.
Definition of Terms
For the purposes of the study, the key terms to be used are defined as follows:
Frequency of study modes (group study and individual study)
According to Yan, frequency of study modes explains how often and what methods are
used by students to study. This can include study groups and individual studying (Yan, 2005).
Parental involvement
Parental involvement is the amount of interaction and involvement the parent has in their
children’s education. This ranges from attending school functions, reading to their child, helping
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 20/112
9
with the child’s homework, calling teachers and providing curfews for the children’s academics.
This is a broad area because it can also include talking to other parents about education which
does not involve the student (Yan, 2005).
Time spent on homework
Time on homework is the amount of time spent studying, doing school work, and/or
anything dealing with the student’s education and academic success ( Yan, 2005). In this study, it
is a self-reported measure.
Asian- American
Asian, Asian American or Pacific Islander is a person having origins in any of the
original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent, or the Pacific Islands.
This area includes, for example, China, India, Japan, Korea, the Philippine Islands, and Samoa
(The Fort Gordon Equal Opportunity Office, 2007). In the schools represented, most of the Asian
student are Vietnamese, Korean, Indian, Japanese, and Chinese.
African American
Students are referred to as African American when they are of African descent, but are
not Latino or Caucasian (Miranda, 2007).
Hispanic
Students are referred to as Hispanic when they are of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban,
Central or South American (Miranda, 2007). In Texas, there are primarily Hispanics from
Mexico, Central America and South America.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 21/112
10
Success
Success is measured by students’ mastery on the Exit-Level TAKS (Texas Assessment of
Knowledge and Skills) test.
Organization of the Study
The study contains five chapters. Included in Chapter 1 is the introduction, statement of
the problem, research questions, purpose of study, significance of the study, assumptions,
limitations of the study, and the definition of terms. Chapter 2 contains the review of literature.
The methodology is found in Chapter 3. The results are located in Chapter 4. Finally, Chapter 5
has recommendations for further study and a conclusion.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 22/112
Chapter II
Review of Literature
Before conducting research, it is important to be thoroughly grounded in regional and
ethnic issues related to the education of Asian Americans, African Americans, and Hispanics.
This was achieved through extensive reading and review of minority students in large urban
school districts, their country of origin and cultural history. Being able to demonstrate some
knowledge of reasons that play a role in the success of Asian American, African American, and
Hispanic students assisted in communicating with the participants. Having knowledge of what
may contribute to their success made the questionnaire run smoothly and assisted the respondent
in remembering what truly helped them succeed (Herrington, 1993).
The United States has traditionally been a multicultural society with numerous ethnic
groups and racial minorities (Bhattacharyya, 2000). Known as the land of opportunity, the
United States has become home to many immigrants from different areas of the globe. The
definition of “minority” has expanded to other minority groups besides African American
(Asian, Middle Eastern, South American, etc.) that have immigrated to the United States. Most
of these ethnic groups have one thing in common – they have experienced some sort of struggle
to advance in the world around them. Success in America can be measured in many different
ways; however, for this study, success is measured by students’ Exit-Level TAKS (Texas
Assessment of Knowledge and Skills) scores. In the educational arena, Asian Americans have
emerged as the most successful minority in America. Bhattacharyya (2000) also noted:
The emergence of Asian Americans as an ethnic minority group in the U. S., especially in
education, has been a phenomenal one. Researchers have been perplexed at the academic
11
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 23/112
12
and professional success of Asian Americans as compared to other ethnic minority
groups (2000, p. 2).
Other minority groups have experienced similar struggles and oppression as Asian
Americans. In the Hispanic and African American cultures, hard work and achievement is
stressed somewhat differently from the Asian American culture. The results from the NAEP
(National Assessment of Educational Progress) consistently show a gap between the basic skills
of the average African American or Latino student and those of the typical White or Asian
American. By the twelfth grade, on average, Black students are four years behind those who are
White or Asian. Hispanics do not do much better (Thernstrom, 2003). It is important to
remember that in every group, some students do well in school while others flounder. There are
plenty of White students who are low-performing. In fact, those White students outnumber
African American, and Hispanics. Whites are still 60 % of the nation’s school children, while
Blacks and Latinos combined are less than one-third of school-age children. Nevertheless, it is
important to look at group averages, not simply absolute numbers (Thernstom, 2003).
All Asians, Hispanics and African Americans have immigrated to the United States
whether they voluntarily immigrated or involuntarily immigrated (Ogbu, 1998). While residing
in the United States, all three minority groups experienced some of the same prejudice and
racism. It is a great phenomenon that a minority group has emerged as a high achieving group
that has surpassed a racial group that once oppressed them (1998). Researchers, Laurence
Steinberg and Pedro Noguera (EdSource Online, 1999) have noted what schools can do to
enhance the educational performance of minority students. They recommended the following:
1. Student achievement should be used in constructive ways, not to blame.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 24/112
13
2. Educators promote a candid discussion about the high rate of parental irresponsibility
in this country and the toll it is taking on our youngster’s lives.
3. Getting the parents of low performing students involved will make a difference.
4. Carefully guide and monitor the course selection of minority students so that they do
not end up with remedial courses that will damage their chances of gaining college
admittance.
5. Having teachers who are particularly skilled in cross-cultural teaching strategies work
with other faculty members.
6. Transforming the debate so that it is less about reforming schools and more about
changing students’ and parents’ attitudes toward school achievement.
7. Insisting that schools expand their efforts to actively draw parents into school and
school programs.
8. Never forgetting that it is student outcomes that matter most if more kids don’t
graduate from high school and go on to college then the school is not really
improving (p. 6).
Asian Americans have succeeded with and without the reforms mentioned above, and many
schools have implemented these suggestions of Steinberg and Noguera. To little avail, the
minorities that attend these reformed schools continue to be low performing.
The inconsistencies in American education are present each school year. The academic
achievement gap among the noted minority groups is an educational crisis. The gap in academic
achievement that is seen today is actually worse than it was 15 years ago. In some minority
groups, family messages do not always match the objectives of the schools. When Black and
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 25/112
14
Hispanics students leave high school barely knowing how to read, their future, and that of the
nation is in jeopardy. Black and Hispanic students are typically academically underachievers, but
innate intelligence is not the explanation. In other places in the country, Hispanic and Asian
students are doing equally well, even though Asian American children are usually the academic
stars (Thernstrom, 2003). Another generation of Black children is drifting through school
without acquiring essential skills and knowledge. Hispanic children are not faring much better.
According to Thernstrom (2003), as these children fare, so fares our nation. When Asian
American students are compared with Black and Hispanic students, the outcome is poor for the
latter. Asian American students fare well when the comparison is made. In most subjects,
Hispanic students at the end of high school do somewhat better than their Black classmates, but
they, too are far behind their White and Asian peers (Therstrom, 2003). Curtis Crawford (2000)
reveals:
Academic disparities among racial groups are unacceptable. The most important
educational challenge for the United States ... is eliminating, once and for all, the still
large educational achievement gaps among the nation’s racial and ethnic groups. This is a
moral and pragmatic imperative, which must be accomplished as quickly as possible (p.
37).
The National Task Force On Minority High Achievement (1999) extends this outlook. It adds a
right to academic equality among racial groups, which if secured, would facilitate racial equality
in earnings and influence. After noting the existence of large racial performance gaps throughout
students’ school careers, the Report, “Reaching the Top” by the College Board (1999), adds the
following points:
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 26/112
15
1. Racial inequalities in academic achievement contribute to racial inequalities in
occupational opportunities and achievements.
2. Black, Latino and Native Americans now are nearly one-third and by 2030 will be
over two-fifths of the U.S. population under age 18.
3. Racial differences in academic achievement can become an increasing source of
social conflict.
4. Without great Black, Latino and Native American academic progress, the institutions
of our society and their leadership cannot be fully integrated.
5. Nor can we draw on the full range of talents in our population.
6. Therefore, the elimination of racial inequalities in academic achievement is a moral
and pragmatic imperative (pp. 1-2).
Nonetheless, eliminating academic disparities in education will afford minority students greater
opportunities to achieve and become successful.
The Asian Migration
Asian Americans first began their journey to the United States in the mid 1800’s. The
Gold rush was beginning in California, and Asians came to America to participate in the gold
rush in hopes of better economic attainment. Many congressional acts, such as the Chinese
Exclusion Act (1882), and the Immigration and Naturalization Act (1952), were put in place by
the national government to control the flow of Asian immigrants. During the 1960s, the only
Asians that were allowed into the United States were those that possessed a professional skill
(Wrigley, 2000). Asians were perceived as a threat to the success of White Americans in the
labor force, and often faced violent antagonism from Whites, because of the professional skill
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 27/112
16
they were expected to have.
It is expected that many immigrants from other nations will be coming to the United
States. Therefore, it is imperative that the United States does something to improve its
educational system to accommodate the many nationalities arriving.
The Model Minority
Asian American students have been known as the model minority because of the
successes they have acquired in education. Often, Asian Americans are switched back and forth
from White to minority in statistics due to their achievement (Crawford, 2000). At the advanced
reading level, Whites and Asians were ahead of Hispanics and Blacks. In proficient reading,
Whites led the minority groups. However, at the advanced math level, Asians were ahead of
Whites (Crawford, 2000, p.38).
Not only are the academic achievement levels higher than other minorities, but Asians
out perform their peers in almost every arena. Lucien Ellington (2001) notes: Recent statistics
indicate that well over 95% of Japanese are literate. Currently, over 95% of Japanese high school
students graduate compared to the 89% of American students (p. 1).
Asian Americans use a lot of what they are taught from their parents and what they
inherit from their culture in their educational endeavors. They are taught to be hard working and
to value education.
Asian Americans have distinct cultural values, such as conformity to authority, respect
for elders, taciturnity, strong social hierarchy, male dominance, and a high emphasis on
learning which are deeply rooted in the Confucian tradition. Asian American parents
encourage their children to be reserved rather than expressive and tend to be more
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 28/112
17
permissive to boys than to girls. They also tend to hold higher educational and
occupational aspirations. Asian American students tend to be passive and nonverbal and
rarely initiate class discussions until they are called on. It is because reticence and
humility are highly valued Asian cultural traits rooted in the Confucian tradition (Park,
2006, p. 78).
In the classroom, Asian American students exhibit what they have learned at home. To their
advantage, the practices that they learn at home are of great use to them.
Asian students usually listen to a teacher’s lecture, take notes copiously, and answer
teachers’ questions. Chinese and Korean students tend to be highly competitive and
individualistic. The Confucian philosophy is very much alive and sets a powerful
interpersonal norm for daily behaviors, attitudes, and practices that demand reflection,
moderation, persistence, humility, obedience to superiors, and stoic response to pain
(Park, 2006, p. 79).
Confucianism is the backbone of the upbringing of Asian American students. Confucius was a
Chinese philosopher and ethical teacher (Kritsonis, 2002). Confucius had a golden rule of treat
others as you would have them treat you. He condemned warfare and the lack of moral
standards.
Confucius’s aim in teaching was to nurture and develop a person so that he might become
someone who would be useful to his state, rather than to produce a scholar belonging to
any one philosophical school. Hence, he taught his pupils to read and to study a wide
variety of books and subjects. Rote memorization was regarded as inadequate form of
learning. His philosophy can be traced through a sequence of actions; the principles of
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 29/112
18
higher education consist in preserving man’s clear character, in giving new life to the
people and in dwelling in perfection or the ultimate good (Kritsonis, 2002, p. 152).
Even though education is supposed to be consistent across the nation, it is not because
states live up to national standards through their own interpretation. This study goes beyond the
educational variance among the states and seeks to find factors that make students from ethnic
groups successful in education. Minorities and Whites approach their education in different ways
because of their upbringing and the other countries in which they were citizens. Douglas Foley
(as cited in Shimahara, 2001) explains:
Voluntary minorities, such as Asian Americans, see the United States as a land of
opportunity compared to their situation back home. They are generally optimistic and
trusting of US society, and work hard in school and in their jobs to succeed.
Consequently, the parents of voluntary immigrants generally hold their youth, not the
schools accountable for school success and failures (Shimahara, 2001, p. 21).
There are opponents of adopting the practices of the “model minority.” Although Asian
American students are successful, Deanna Kuhn (2006) notes that, there are some drawbacks
from mimicking the educational routines in the Asian American culture. Asian parents instill in
their children the belief that academic success leads to family pride, material wealth and social
status, and academic leads to the opposite—shame and disgrace. The disadvantage, however, is
that the relationship is an instrumental one: There is a small connection between the amount of
effort invested in an activity and the outcome of the activity. There is no existence of an inherent
relationship between the two factors stated above. However, there is an inherent relationship and
value within the activity itself. The value found in the activities students engage in will not be
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 30/112
19
realized until students discover the meaning of participating in the activity (Kuhn, 2006). In
addition to the strict parental influence that Asian Americans parents have on their children,
Asian American children also display behaviors that are unfavorable.
Overshadowed by the popular model minority image of Asian American students and
high levels of academic achievement among a portion of this group, their problem behaviors
have often been overlooked in educational as well as research communities (Shrake, 2004).
Educators cannot rely on the model minority stereotypes about Asian Americans. Asian families
can only be learned by getting to know individual Asian parents and families. Educators that do
rely on the model minority stereotype risk doing very little to help those Asian American
students that do not excel in academics (Lee, 2001).
The stereotype of being the model minority hurts at-risk Asian American students.
Contrary to popular belief, the at-risk label is not only used to characterize African American and
Hispanic students. Although Asian-American students make up a small segment of the overall
population, these students continue to be ignored or underserved because of the success of the
entire group. When success of the Asian American group is highlighted, educators and the
general public direct their attention to at-risk students of other ethnicities, forgetting that Asian
American students can also be at-risk (Doan, 2006).
Finding meaning and value in activities in which one is involved is important because
that is when true learning takes place. However, when educating the mass is of primary concern,
adopting the best practices available are more important. Educators should understand that many
Asian parents highly respect teachers and administrators. Therefore, they believe their role is to
follow and listen to the judgments of educators. This can serve as a barrier because these parents
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 31/112
20
may feel that communicating with teachers may be perceived as disrespectful. While Asian
parents emphasize academic content much earlier than in most other American homes, all Asian
children do not do well in academic areas (Lee, 2001). Jane Kim, author of Top of the Class:
Asian Parents Raise High Achievers and How You Can Too, (as cited in Elsmary, 2005) explains
what Asian parents teach their children to enhance their educational success, and highlights the
differences between Asian and American families. Asian parents have the tendency to place
pressure or force their children in one direction. Asian parents can learn something from non-
Asian parents by expressing that their child’s happiness does mean as much as any educational
achievements (Elsmary, 2005).
The Social Factors that Impact Academic Achievement of African American Students
Throughout history, African Americans have endured many years of struggle and
oppression. African Americans in the United States interpret their oppression as methodical and
enduring due to the historical and contemporary experiences with institutionalized discrimination
(slavery, job discrimination, structural disadvantages, and racial discrimination in school) they
have experienced. Consequently, African Americans tend to participate in activities that
challenge common practices of accomplishment and they dismiss the value of obtaining an
education. As a result, they begin to trust their practices of “making it” instead of the construct
and purpose of school and its agents. The theory of “making it” and the distrust of the purpose of
school, stifle their commitment to school and societal norms (Hovart, 2006). Although some
African Americans equate academic success with “acting White,” social scientists confidently
predicted that after the Supreme Court decision, Brown v. Board of Education, 1954, that the
academic gap among minorities would soon be eliminated; however, this did not occur.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 32/112
21
Academic success of African Americans went from abysmal to merely terrible (Chubb, 2002).
The academic gains in the 1960s, 1970s, and the 1980s have slowed. Educators and the African
American community have not been able to eliminate or significantly reduce the academic
achievement gap between African American, Latino(a), and students that identify themselves as
Asian Americans (Edmund, 2006). African Americans are much more likely to suffer the social
problems that often accompany low income (Chubb, 2002).
Over the years, researchers have debated the causes of the academic achievement of the
African American student. Such causes that have been cited are family, peer groups, culture,
discrimination, heredity, and schooling. Involuntary minorities, those minorities that did not
choose to come to the United States, adopt low school performance as a form of adaptation to
their limited social and economic opportunity in adult life. Another cause that may contribute to
the academic achievement of African Americans, is John Ogbu’s theory of the “burden of acting
white.” Involuntary minorities who were forcefully incorporated into the U. S. tend to attribute
academic success with “whiteness” and thus may reject school success with their own ethnic and
racial identities (Lew, 2006).
Currently, schools and school reforms are boosting the achievement of African American
students to levels nearing those of Whites (Chubb, 2002). Therefore, there are some
improvements, but not enough to close the achievement gap among American students. The
threat of stereotypes plays a major role in the academic achievement of African American
students. Stereotype threat is the knowledge that others may judge one’s performance in terms of
one’s racial background, rather than in terms of one’s individual background. Minority students
may be vulnerable to stereotypes in the domain of academics, because the stereotype surrounding
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 33/112
22
these students concerns a generalized suspicion about their intelligence. The effects of
stereotypes can occur without the stereotyped individual himself or herself believing the
stereotype—he or she simply has to have the knowledge of the stereotype and the knowledge
that others may view him or her through that stereotype. African American students in particular
are likely to experience doubts about their acceptance in educational institutions and such
concerns are likely to be accentuated in academic environments to which high achieving
minority students strive (Bennett, 2004).
If the achievement gap could be reduced, the fortunes of African Americans would not
only be raised, but the social and economic differences that intensify the country’s racial tensions
would also be ameliorated (Chubb, 2002).
The Social Factors that Impact Academic Achievement of Hispanic Students
Hispanic students often experience the same obstacles as African Americans. Typically,
Hispanic students tend to be poorer, attend more segregated schools and live in urban areas.
These students account for the largest population of students served in programs of English-
language acquisition. It would be an error to assume that all Hispanic students have similar needs
or require the same type of education. However, current guidelines and educational practices
mandated for Hispanic students are built on such assumptions and have had the unintended
consequence of damaging the students’ futures, education and otherwise. When lawmakers and
educational leaders remain oblivious to these false assumptions, misinterpretations occur, and
stereotypical thinking prevails (Ramirez, 2005).
Frequent in Hispanic families is the need to support the family. Barabra Sparks (2002)
mentions: Economic necessity of holding down multiple jobs in order to care for one’s family
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 34/112
23
makes it virtually impossible to add educational classes to daily life. Often, no matter how much
one may desire to do so (p. 9).
Other barriers that seem to affect the education of Hispanics include cultural difference
from the dominate society, discrimination, and racism. These factors define the social context of
daily life for the majority of the population who do not belong to the middle class (Sparks,
2002). According to some Hispanic youth, the assumption of their intellectual inferiority is the
most significant obstacle in their academic pursuits (Cammarota, 2006). Abigail Thernstrom
(2003) further explains the academic success of Hispanic students.
It is alarming that Hispanic students that have had at least 12 years of schooling without
developing even the most fundamental skills is alarming. The research conducted by
NAEP’s experts find that between subject to subject comparison (reading, mathematics,
or science), Asian and White students’ differences are on one hand, and Black and
Hispanic student differences are on the other hand. Nearly 40% of Asians in the twelfth
grade rank in the top two categories in reading, while a quarter of Hispanics achieve that
level. In math and science, little more than 3% of Hispanics displayed more than a
“partial mastery” of the knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient work
(pp. 16-17).
Another issue that compounds the academic achievement of Hispanic students is the
language barrier. A component of the achievement gap between Hispanic and White students is
certainly limited English proficiency among a significant minority of Hispanic students,
especially those in the first generation. However, studies have shown lower academic attainment
for second- and third- generation Hispanic students, so recent immigration or limited English
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 35/112
24
language proficiency cannot be responsible for the entire gap (Sparks, 2002). Among Hispanics
between the ages of 18 and 25, 48% hold less than a high school credentials (Clark, 2006).
The academic achievement gap among minority students is enhanced by the various
obstacles that African-American and Hispanic students have had to endure. Though educational
leaders may not be able to control external factors that impact the academic achievement of
minority students, the knowledge that they gain about the external factors may assist educational
leaders in improving internal factors (school controlled) based on their knowledge of the internal
factors.
American Education versus Asian Education
In Asian countries, education is a national product. Teachers create the textbooks and
every student takes the same test for achievement levels. All Japanese texts are written and
produced in the private sector; however, the Ministry of Education approves the texts that are
produced. Japanese and American textbooks differ in the areas of textbook content, length, and
classroom utilization. Another way textbooks differ is the content of Japanese textbooks that are
based upon the national curriculum, while most American texts tend to cover a wider array of
topics. The number of pages in the textbooks differ as well. Japanese textbooks typically contain
about half the pages of their American counterparts. Consequently, unlike many American
teachers, almost all Japanese teachers finish their textbooks in an academic year. (Ellington,
2005).
Another difference in education between the U. S. and Asian countries is the schooling
track that students follow. Between 75% and 80% of all Japanese students enroll in university
preparation tracks. Most university-bound students attend separate academic high schools while
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 36/112
25
students who definitely do not plan on higher education attend separate commercial or industrial
high schools. In the United States, students enter secondary schools based on either school
district assignment or personal choice. In Japan, almost all students are admitted to high school
based upon entrance examination performance (Ellington, 2005).
Although Asian students out perform American students, when Chinese students were
asked about their education in China, almost all students involved in a study conducted by Yali
Zhao (2008), resented the exam-oriented system, and they tended to idealize American education
because of the academic pressure and frustration that they experienced in Chinese schools.
Because these students have had to deal with exams and teacher-centered, book-oriented lectures
throughout their school years, these students were longing for the American way of education,
which they believed to be creative, student centered, and full of fun and meaningful hands-on
activities (Zhao, 2008).
In the United States, decisions about education are left to the states; however, the national
government does place standards on education that states must adhere. Brent Staples (2005) of
the New York Times mentions that four years ago, The No Child Left Behind Act was enacted to
put the problem of closing the achievement gap on the national agenda. However, the country
has gotten involved in a dispute about a segment of the law that requires annual testing in the
early grades to ensure that the states are closing the achievement gap. The testing debate
intensified when national math and reading scores showed dismal performance across the board
(2005).
Elaine Wu (2005) further examined the educational ranking of the United States in
relation to Asian nations. She attributes U. S. ranking to the way educational material is
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 37/112
26
delivered to the students. The U. S. accommodates students’ needs and wants. Students in the
United States learn to pass a test, but they do not learn the concepts. Therefore, the only way we
measure how well students do is through testing. Teachers end up teaching how to take the test
and not necessarily the subject matter (2005). Many research reports such as A Nation At Risk
(National Commission on Excellence in Education, 1983) have been utilized to find the fallacy
in American education. They have found that reform is needed in math and science. If mediocre
educational performance was an intended weapon of an opposing force to be used on America,
America would have considered this an act of war. The United States has allowed poor academic
performance to happen despite the gains in achievement made in the wake of the Sputnik
challenge and the Cold War. Over the years, we have unassembled fundamental support systems
which assisted in making those gains possible. America, in effect, has been committing an act of
thoughtless, one-dimensional educational disarmament (T. H. Bell, Secretary of Education,
National Commission on Excellence in Education, 1983). When American students are
compared to their peers around the world, American students continuously are out performed by
their peers.
Teaching methods also contribute to success in the educational systems of other
countries, and the failure of the United States’ educational system. Over 15,000 school districts
make curricular decisions that align with their state’s guidelines. Many Americans have begun to
question the curricular diversity of their own system and to consider national standards as a
means of improving U. S. education because they are amazed by Japan’s performance in
mathematics and science. America has tried to imitate the Japanese systems by overemphasizing
its uniformity and equating national curriculum guidelines with national standards (Decoker,
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 38/112
27
2002).
As mentioned before, the curriculum and textbooks used by the nations are vastly
different. This difference is one of the components that is responsible for the lack of achievement
in American schools as far as minorities are concerned. Standards developed by the Mathematics
Achievement Partnership under Achieve Inc. (2001) rely almost entirely on the notion that
curricula in the countries that are outperforming the U. S. cover more complicated material
earlier. It is necessary to consider these curricula and associated textbooks. Many studies have
specifically undertaken international comparisons of these items. The study of A Splintered
Vision (Schmidt, 1997) discovered that the U.S. curriculum is broad but shallow, that we touch
on topics again and again, but never deeply. Germany and Japan, most often cited in this study,
are able to move to more complicated material earlier, because they approach the curriculum in a
narrower, but deeper way. The basic idea is that students are able to gain mastery by
concentrating on a smaller number of topics and then moving on to the next lesson.
In addition, the performance expectations implied in U. S. curricula and textbooks centers
on routine procedures and discrete knowledge, which hampers conceptual understanding
(Schweingruber, 2002). The United Stated focuses on procedure, and we try to teach many topics
fast. Other countries tend to break up and go much more in-depth. They work on the concept, not
just the procedure. Countries that did well in rankings focused on teaching the ideas and taught a
few topics a year. Students will learn what a fraction really is, not just how to add or subtract
them (Wu, 2005).
Another difference is in a particular content area studied in both countries. Diana
Lindman and Kyle Ward express an isolationist tendency within the American social studies
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 39/112
28
curriculum. The U. S. educational system, commonly deal with national and world history from a
political and patriotic perspective, and American students are rarely exposed to various
perspectives in the classroom. Therefore, it is critical that American teachers move students
beyond judgment and toward understanding and that they help them consider other perspectives
(Lindaman, 2004). On the other hand, Chinese students have been greatly exposed to the outside
world, especially to information about the United States. They have gained this exposure
through social studies courses, English courses, media, and personal contact with Americans
(Zhao, 2008).
When comparing the countries’ educational systems, it is apparent that the Asian
educational system aims to cultivate students with a patriotic and collective spirit, and it
encourages students to work hard to achieve their goals in life. The American educational system
tends to emphasize the development of students’ creativity, competitive spirit, and life skills
(Zhao, 2008). The way material is taught in America is apparently making a difference in the
academic achievement in America.
Parental Involvement
Parents of Asian American students believe that it is their responsibility to direct their
children on the path of success. This is their primary concern. They believe that their role in the
education of their children is supplemental to what the school teaches. Asian American parents
view their role as supplementing what the school is doing and filling in the gaps because they are
concerned about the American public school’s general laxness. They understand their
responsibility—to teach the child the skills they believe are needed for the child to successfully
compete and come out ahead. The parents view their responsibility as one of guiding the child
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 40/112
29
through a path that leads to greater chances for success. This guiding reveals itself in a number of
ways—teaching the child to hold a pencil before he entered kindergarten and choosing his
activities carefully. The parents focus the child’s attention on this path, which they refer to as
kwai doe (Siu, 2001).
Kevin Marjoribanks (2005) explains that for elementary students, families that are
academically-oriented have parents that possess high expectations for their children, provide
stimulating educational experiences for their children, understand the importance of school and
are knowledgeable about their child’s school assignments. For high school students,
Marjoribanks mentions that parents that provide a family setting conducive to learning, such as
one that includes conversations about staying in school, praise for academic success, interest in
student academic performance and activities, and high expectations about school achievement.
These elements can promote high student academic achievement.
Research has found the reason why schools are reluctant to involve and reach out to
parents. Some educators believe that minority communities have very little to offer and that
parents only added to the problems already present (Guerra, 2008). According to Donna Mahler,
(as cited in Gregory, 2000) the benefits of involving all parents in meaningful home-school
partnerships is a well-needed and well-understood; however, teachers remain ill-prepared for
involving parents, particularly those who are parents of minority children. Teacher preparation
programs often neglect parent involvement practices producing teachers who lack appropriate
strategies for involving parents in the educational process. One result of this lack of teacher
preparation can be seen in the drop in teacher efforts to involve parents which begin as early as
the second or third grade (Gregory, 2000).
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 41/112
30
The home environment may influence the extent of persistence and achievement of an
individual in any particular endeavor. Parents can promote children’s cognitive development and
academic achievement directly by becoming involved in their children’s educational activities.
Parents not only effect what the child brings to the school setting when he or she begins school
but also can influence how well the child acquires school-related skills throughout the school
years and can influence other behaviors, such as study habits, that are likely to afford the child’s
achievement and attainment (Stewart, 2007).
Strong academic outcomes among middle level and high school students were associated
with communication between parents and school personnel about the child’s schooling and
future plans (Epstein, 2002). Parental involvement is beneficial to students of all ethnic groups
and socio-economic levels. When parents are regularly informed and consulted about important
school issues, they will begin to feel genuinely involved. When parents are asked to participate
in the decision making process about important school policies and procedures, they will more
readily answer the call to be involved. The more involved parents are in their children’s
education, at home and at school, the more successful children will be academically and socially.
It must be understood that these benefits will not just be recognized and appreciated by parents
and students, teachers will also benefit from genuine parent involvement. Teachers report more
positive feelings about their teaching and schools when there is a greater degree of parent
involvement (Gregory, 2000).
Schools have to go above and beyond to regain the participation and involvement of
parents and guardians. It is no longer enough to pass out newsletters to take home, post messages
of involvement on the school’s marquee, or hope for a parent conference. If the schools want
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 42/112
31
improved parental involvement, they have to enact more initiatives to improve parental
involvement. Schools can assist parents in becoming more involved. According to Joyce Epstein
(2002), there are six types of involvement that schools can enact to enhance parental
involvement.
The Six Types of Involvement Model include:
• Parenting. Assisting families with parenting skill, family support, understanding
child and adolescent development and setting home conditions to support learning
at each age and grade level. Assist schools in understanding families’ background,
cultures, and goals for children.
• Communicating. Communicate with families about school programs and student
progress. Create two-way communication channels between school and home.
• Volunteering. Improve recruitment, training, activities and schedules to involve
families as volunteers and as audiences at the school or in other locations. Enable
educators to work with volunteers who support students and the school.
• Learning at Home. Involve families with their children in academic learning at
home, including homework, goal-setting, and other curriculum-related activities.
Encourage teachers to design homework that enables students to share and discuss
interesting tasks.
• Decision Making. Include families as participants in school decisions, governance
and advocacy activities through school councils or improvement teams, committees
and parent organizations.
• Collaborating with Community. Coordinate resources and services for families,
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 43/112
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 44/112
33
gladly assumed the role of teacher after the school day ended” (Elsmary, 2005). Having the
parents involved shows the student that the parent cares about the educational endeavors of their
children and it communicates that parents contribute to the success of their children (Yan, 2005).
Parental involvement has conceptualized as a form of social capital. Social capital is
created from the strength of relationships between adults and children. These relationships may
be especially important to adolescents who often require adult guidance and assistance to
perform important developmental tasks (2005). Family obligation is a form of parental
involvement that includes participating in parent-teacher organizations, attending school
programs, and discussing school topics. This family obligation is related to parents’ intensive
investment in the well-being of the school outcome in particular and the value of education in
general (2005). Educators in America have begun pointing their fingers at parents for the low
achievement of American students. The trend 20 to 30 years ago that advocated students learning
by themselves is long gone. Debra Saunders (1995) discloses:
The newest trend in education “reform” is the inclusion of parental-education programs
involvement in student activities. President Clinton’s Goals 2000 includes an entire
section on “parental assistance.” The movement seeks a new curriculum that urges
parents to be nurturing and uncritical (p. 68).
Good work ethic, dedication, and determination are skills that can be taught by parents. Parents
are the first teachers that a child has, and wealth of knowledge can be gained from parents.
Students may strive to make their parents proud as well as themselves. However, the ingredients
to gain success must be taught, nurtured and refined with growth. Clara C. Parks (2006)
recognizes:
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 45/112
34
In the Hmong culture [largely southeast Asians], parents appear to hold even higher
educational aspirations for their children than the children themselves. Therefore, Hmong
students’ high aspirations appear to come from their parents’ unusually high aspirations
for them which apparently are internalized by the children (p. 13).
In summary, if schools want more parental involvement, they have to be more creative in getting
the attention of parents in order for them to participate.
Time Spent on Homework
Time spent on homework is another component that may explain the academic
achievement and failure of minority groups (Yan, 2005). Time spent on homework may include
reading a book, participating in a project assignment, being involved in school-related activities
or completing class assignments. Research by Steven Ingles (2002) acknowledges that Asians
spend more time on homework outside of school than Blacks, Hispanics and Whites. Black
students study alone for 8 to 10 hours a week. Chinese students study for 14 hours a week. They
tend to work 8 to 10 hours alone and about 4 hours with other students, checking each other’s
answers and their English. Their family members quiz them regularly and they work on
problems kept in a public file in the library. Unlike Black students, they know exactly where they
stand relative to the rest of their classmates (Ingles, 2002). The amount of time dedicated to
school and school work makes a tremendous amount of difference in the success of American
students.
Time spent on homework also includes time spent off task such as watching television
and talking on the telephone. Jayne Freeman (1995) states that the amount of school hours differs
between the United States and Asian nations. Japanese students, for example, spend more days in
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 46/112
35
school and study more hours studying after school. Thus, having more hours of instruction and
practice in a given subject than American students of the same age, the Japanese students
naturally tend to score higher (Freeman, 1995).
Academic achievement obtained by Americans can be a result of the amount of time
students dedicate to their education. According to Morrison Wong and Charles Hirschman
(1986), the comparatively larger number of Asian students receiving high grades may be
partially accounted for by the fact that they report spending a greater number of hours on
homework per week. Asian Americans were more likely to spend 5-10 hours per week on
homework. An interesting, and for some a discouraging feature of contemporary high school
education, is the finding that more Hispanic and African American students and between 1 to 8
% of the Asian students report not doing any homework or spending less than one hour per week
on it (1986). Homework is used as a tool to continue education in the home.
Due to the large amount of time in the home environment, it appears that small disparities
in efficiencies of parental support of academic progress or the direct teaching and simulation in
the “curriculum of the home” can have large effects not only on verbal subjects such as reading
but science and mathematics as well. Homework brings learning to students’ daily lives, and
students are asked to assume more responsibility in arranging their learning environment and in
monitoring their homework activities (Xu, 2004).
Children continue to struggle with distraction in home. Students reported doing
homework with the television on (49%) and even more frequently with a radio or stereo on
(58%). These students feel that the radio or stereo sound enhanced their study experience.
However, they admitted that television was somewhat bothersome. Television and telephone
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 47/112
36
were the two most troublesome homework distractions, mentioned by more half of the students.
Thirty-six to 40% listed additional distractions, including parents siblings coming into and out
the room and teasing and asking questions; noise from vacuum cleaners, washing machines, or
doorbells; and disturbance from radios or stereos. Other distractions include internal distractions
such as mood swings (Xu, 2004).
Doing homework often can create a foundation for developing desirable work habits
since “regardless of the homework’s intellectual content, there is a need to deal with distractions,
and a role for emotional coping, task force, and persistence.” Adolescents still can benefit from
assistance from parents of all socioeconomic backgrounds to help them deal with external and
internal distractions while doing homework (2004).
Measures of curriculum of the home account for as much as 50% of the variance in
school achievement; and school-based home-enrichment programs that encourage parents to
stimulate their children raise achievement as much as a standard deviation, say, from the 50th to
84th percentile (Paschal, 1984). Paschal also asserts that academic achievement depends greatly
on time spent on homework. When time is spent on educational-related material, success is the
greatest among students. Other activities, such as television viewing, talking on the telephone do
not yield success in education.
Extensive classroom research on “time on homework” and international comparisons of
year-round time for study suggest that additional homework might promote U. S.
students’ achievement. Homework represents another area in which schools can intervene
in an effort to raise achievement. Though homework is given in the United States,
American students continue to score lower than students in other countries because they
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 48/112
37
spend less time studying within and outside their school classes. Homework may chiefly
displace discretionary leisure-time television viewing that appears excessive as far as the
promotion of school learning is concerned (Paschel, 1984, p. 97).
With the advancement of technology, it has become more and more difficult for the attention of
students to be focused on achieving. Media reports tell of individuals that have gained success
through entertainment and sports. It is true that one can be successful without the assistance of
school, but only a few are successful without school. Therefore, it is important for schools to
engage students in a way that stresses the importance of education. Engaging students in the
classroom in ways that interests them may assist educators in capturing the attention of students
in their school. Schools have even included these media forms into their classrooms by making
relationships between education and topics in the media. The problem that exists is how students
spend their time when they are out of school. Time is such an important factor in this equation
because if an individual runs out of it, there is nothing left.
John Lofty (1995) explained how students get confused about time and how it can work
against them. Students need to be aware of the time values and practices of academic life, and
that their difficulties accommodating the timescapes of the academy can become good reason for
their failure. Such moves assume political and historic significance as the academy assess
underrepresented student populations segregated along lines of class, ethnicity, and gender. Less
apparent though, is the role of time in constructing these lines. Ordinary identities become visible
typically when students transgress our time codes, for example, by talking during instructional
time or by handing in late work. Less visible to teachers is the source of such transgressions in
students’ ordinary identities, which encompass behaviors relative to how time is used and valued
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 49/112
38
(Lofty, 1995). It is important for educators and families to engrain in the students’ psyche the
importance of education, and how it is the key to success. The time that is invested on academics
will garner significant returns on students’ academic success.
Frequency of Individual Study Modes and Frequency of Group Study Modes
Study modes are also components that may improve success. Many American students in
higher education meet in groups to study and continue to employ education in their conversation
with their peers. In these groups, students will meet with other students that speak a similar
language and discuss their viewpoints on how to complete an assignment. According to Monica
Lambert (2006), study modes are an important component to investigate because,
with the passage of the No Child Left behind Act, academic standards for students have
significantly increased. Never before has it been more important for learners to maximize
the time they spend studying. Although secondary level teachers often assume that all
students have acquired sufficient study skills by the time they reach high school, many
have not (p. 241).
The study practices adopted by learners impacts their achievement in their academics. The way a
student studies determines what knowledge is retained and learned, what concepts are
understood and how a student can apply what is learned. This concept begins at home, and it
continues until the goal is obtained. However, students lack proper, effective study skills that
causes them to fall short of mastery. Schools have begun incorporating study skills lessons into
their curriculum. Study skills are an essential part of independent learning. It is important that
teachers incorporate study skills in their instruction so that all students with or without learning
disabilities acquire these necessary skills (Lambert, 2006).
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 50/112
39
Since study habits, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study
modes are an important part of academic achievement, it is helpful to know what yields the best
results so that students will get the most out of studying. Study habits, frequency of individual
study modes, and frequency of group study modes are needed in the equation of improving the
academic achievement of minority groups.
Robert Slavin (1980) has investigated the types of study modes that yield results of high
academic achievement. He used the study modes of student teams, peer tutoring, and individual
study. Team techniques that involve learning have generally had positive effects on such student
outcomes as academic achievement, mutual attraction among students, and race relations in
desegregated schools (Slavin, 1980). Slavin divided the students in his study into four groups.
Team reward , Group Task focused on 4 to 5 students working together and sat together at all
times. Team Reward, Individual Task focused on team members sitting together, but working
individually; Individual reward, Team Task groups sat by themselves, and came together to work
on assignments. Lastly, Individual Reward, Individual Task , students worked and sat by
themselves. On each of these experimental groups, Slavin employed STAD (Student Teams-
Achievement Divisions) and TGT (Teams-Games Tournament) In his study Slavin found that
group forms of study habits increase academic achievement (1980).
Asian students practice peer tutoring and voluntary homework. The study modes as
described by Gary Decoker (2002) explains the differences study modes of American and Asian
students. He also explains that in addition to in-class instruction, rapid learners can assist those
who are slower or who do not understand the lesson. The fast learners, in turn, benefit from
being placed in the position of clarifying their understanding as they explain and expand the
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 51/112
40
discussion along the lines of the questions raised by the slower students. Homework that is
assigned in the West is not commonly assigned in Japan. In Japan, students are expected to study
independently or to solve practice problems. Rather than follow a teacher-assigned sets of
problems or tasks like what is practiced in the West, it is assumed that students will review the
day’s lesson and anticipate the lesson that will be studied during the next meeting of the class.
Although Japanese students are expected to engage in study after school, many teachers assume
that homework is not an especially effective means for improving students’ academic
achievement (Decoker, 2002).
Similar to studying modes, doing homework is not the most ideal way to spend one’s
time, however, in order to improve academic achievement, this is a must. Not only is it important
to do homework because the teacher required the completion of it, but it is equally important to
spend time studying in various modes to review and practice the content taught in class.
Mastering a lesson in class requires that work is completed outside of class and a sufficient
amount of time is spent on study modes preferred by the student. How a student studies
determines the how much information is retained that will contribute to the students’ academic
achievement.
Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine the difference among Asian American, Hispanic,
and African American students with regard to parental involvement, time spent on homework,
frequency of individual study modes and frequency of group study modes. There are many other
factors that contribute to the academic success of Asian American, African American, and
Hispanic students; however this study is focusing on the three components mentioned above.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 52/112
41
In conclusion, by determining the differences among Asian American, Hispanic, and
African American students with regard to parental involvement, time spent on homework,
frequency of individual study modes and frequency of group study modes, educational leaders in
this country will have a perspective on how to address certain academic problems in American
education. The educational/learning gap continues to increase between the students of America.
Elaine Wu (2005) explains:
Since education is available to everyone, there’s not a lot of competition in our schools.
Other countries force kids to focus at an earlier age, and there’s more competition to deal
with. It’s basically the teaching system, the values and cultures of a country that underlie
its education system (p. 3).
The United States is a powerful force in the world. However, it will lose its force in the world if
it does not improve its educational ranking in the world. What is more important, U. S. students
will continue to be disadvantaged and outperformed by their peers in other countries until U.S.
educational leaders find a remedy to the variance in academic achievement among minority
groups.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 53/112
Chapter III
Methodology
Statistics gathered by NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress, 2003)
suggest that some Asian American students are more academically successful than any other
minority group in America. There exists a significant gap between the academic achievement
levels of African American and Hispanic students and the achievement levels of Asian American
students (Gordon, 2006). Some factors that may influence the success or lack thereof of Asian
American, African American, and Hispanic students are frequency of individual study modes,
frequency of group study modes, time spent doing homework and parental involvement.
Gary Decoker (2004) notes that Chinese students also reported liking school more than
their Western counterparts and perceived education as their most pressing task. Test scores
continuously show a gap in the achievement of Asian American, African American, and
Hispanic Students. The problem is that if Asian American, African American, and Hispanic
groups have endured the same type of struggle in their past, what contributes to the difference in
achievement levels and what can be done to close the achievement gap among Asian American,
African American, and Hispanic students.
This study describes differences among Asian American, Hispanic, and African
American students with regard to parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of
individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes; thus, giving educational leaders
insight on what can be done to raise the achievement level of their minority students. Identifying
the factors that may contribute to the achievement gap in minority students and closing it will
allow educators to better serve students needs without resorting to other options that may not
42
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 54/112
43
benefit minority students.
Research Questions
The study sought to answer the following questions:
1. How do Asian American, Hispanic, and African American students at selected high
schools compare with respect to parental involvement, time spent on homework,
frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes?
2. What are the differences when studying English, Math, Science, and Social Studies
among Asian American, Hispanic, and African American students with respect to
frequency of individual study modes, frequency of group study modes and time
spent doing homework?
Hypotheses
H1 – There are statistically significant difference among Asian American, Hispanic, and African
American students with respect to parental involvement, time spent on English
homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes.
(Refers to Research Question 1 and 2)
H2 - There are statistically significant difference among Asian American, Hispanic, and African
American students with respect to parental involvement, time spent on Math homework,
frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes. (Refers to
Research Question 1 and 2)
H3 - There are statistically significant difference among Asian American, Hispanic, and African
American students with respect to parental involvement, time spent on Science
homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 55/112
44
(Refers to Research Question 1 and 2)
H4 - There are statistically significant difference among Asian American, Hispanic, and African
American students with respect to parental involvement, time spent on Social Studies
homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes.
(Refers to Research Question 1 and 2)
The independent variables in research questions 1 and 2 in the study are parental
involvement, time spent on English, Math, Science and Social Studies homework, frequency of
individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes. The dependent variables are
academic achievement of Asian American, African American and Hispanic students. For the
study, the students of the different minority groups were asked about their personal engagement
with each factor tested. Once those responses were collected, they were also compared to note
the differences among Asian American, African American and Hispanic students with respect to
parental involvement, time spent on English Math, Science, and Social Studies homework,
frequency of individual study modes and frequency of group study modes. For research question
2, the independent variables are Asian American, African American and Hispanic students, and
the dependent variables are time and frequency of study modes when studying English,
Mathematics, Science and Social Studies. Students were asked about the time they spent
studying and how they studied each subject area in order to test the hypotheses and answer the
research question.
Research Methodology
A quantitative design was used to determine the difference among Asian American,
Hispanic, and African American students with regard to parental involvement, time spent on
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 56/112
45
homework, frequency of individual study modes and frequency of group study modes. High
school students that were 18 years old and of all ethnic groups completed the questionnaire of the
study; however, the research focused only on those students that are Asian American, African
American, and Hispanic students.
Research Design
The population for the study consisted of 713, 18- year old, high school senior students of
Asian American/ Pacific Islander (N = 20), African American (N = 347), Hispanic (N = 233),
White (N = 105), and Native American (N = 8) decent from five high schools. These schools
were chosen due to their minority population, Texas accountability rating, and proximity. The
students involved in the study completed the same questionnaire.
The questionnaire was used to prompt the respondent to remember the amount of parental
involvement, frequency of individual study modes, frequency of group study modes, and the
time spent on homework they experienced during their schooling as well as other factors that
encouraged them to be academically successful. Twelfth grade senior students that were
involved in the study were students in Advanced Placement, Honors, and Regular social studies
classes.
Closed ended questions on a Likert-type scale questionnaire were used so that the
respondents could reflect upon their past experiences in education, growing up and relating those
experiences to their educational success. The questionnaire took approximately 20 minutes to
complete.
Inferential statistics, utilizing a One-Way ANOVA, was used to note differences among
Asian American, Hispanic, and African American students with regard to parental involvement,
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 57/112
46
time spent on homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study
modes. Finding the differences of the factors among the three minority groups may indicate what
accounts for their academic achievement. Information from the participants’ Exit – Level TAKS
scores was used to determine possible relationships between the factors that may or may not
indicate success of the minority groups.
Subjects of the Study
The five high schools involved in the study were located in southeast Texas in two large
urban school districts. Each high school had between 260-850 seniors. The Executive Director of
Research in the participating school districts gave permission to the researcher to conduct the
questionnaire with the student participants. Principals of the participating high schools decided
how the questionnaire would be conducted at their schools. Some principals gathered all 18 year
old, senior students in one location to complete the questionnaire, while others preferred the
questionnaire be given in their senior English or Social Studies classes. The students were given
an Adolescent Assent form and the questionnaire.
The participants were also told that their participation was voluntary and their identities
would remain unknown. The contents of the Adolescent Assent form was explained to the
participants, they were told that if they would like to participate in the study, they needed to sign
and date the assent form. The target population was Asian American, African American, and
Hispanic students that were high school seniors in five, large urban school districts in a
southeastern city in Texas. Parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of
individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes were factors investigated for the
minority groups of Asian American, African American, and Hispanic. The comparison of the
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 58/112
47
two sets of data (responses from the questionnaire and the TAKS scores) determined if students’
academic achievement were related to the factors.
By looking at the minority groups’ Exit- Level TAKS scores and the responses on the
questionnaire, the investigator looked for differences and correlates between variables and
successful TAKS scores.
Instrumentation
The instrument that was used is a Likert-style questionnaire. The questions were
generated based on the four factors of the study. They were centered on parental involvement,
time spent on homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study
modes. (APPENDIX C) The questionnaire took into consideration the following in order to
become knowledge about the subjects.
To determine the difference among Asian American, Hispanic, and African American
students with regard to parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of individual
study modes and frequency of group study modes, the answers from the questionnaire on
parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of individual study modes, and
frequency of group study modes were ranked from 1-6 (6: having the most influence and 1:
having the least influence). The answers from the questionnaire were then divided based on the
minority groups involved in the study.
Once the answers were ranked and divided among the minority groups studied, that
information was placed in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 13.0 version,
and the inferential statistical method of one-way ANOVA was used to determine the differences
of among Asian American, Hispanic, and African American students with respect to parental
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 59/112
48
involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of
group study modes. Those outcomes were then compared to the minority groups’ TAKS scores
to determine possible relationships between their academic achievement and the factors being
tested.
Validity
A researcher must ensure that his or her research is researching what they intended to
research in order to establish validity. In the current study, validity was obtained by having four
students of different races, Asian American, two African American and Hispanic students in one
of the school districts involved in the study. The questionnaire was piloted to students that are
high school seniors to ensure that the meanings of the questions on the questionnaire are clear
and pertinent to the study, and the answers given by the respondents are the answers needed by
the investigator. The students that participated in the pilot engaged in a conversation with the
researcher about the questionnaire. The terminology used in each question was discussed and
adjusted to the students’ input.
Reliability
The questionnaire used was re-tested once input from the students involved in the pilot
study were incorporated into the questionnaire. When the questionnaire was re-tested with the
input, the students were asked again about the clarity and structure of the questionnaire, to which
they agreed was clear and easily understood due to the layout of the questionnaire and the
terminology used.
To begin, the high school student respondents were asked the same questions on the
questionnaire during one of their school days. The questionnaire was completed on paper to be
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 60/112
49
inputted into SPSS. The students were instructed not to place their name on the questionnaire to
ensure anonymity. Students completed the questionnaire, turned it in, and were not allowed to
complete it again if they had completed it once before. By doing this, all 18 year old, senior
students had the opportunity to be involved in the study because all seniors were required to take
social studies or English class or report to the location specified by their principal.
In addition, the Exit-Level TAKS test is a state-sponsored test that all students have to
take in order to move to the next grade or graduate from high school. The test is a standardized,
achievement test that measures what the student has learned.
Procedure
Investigation on the topic began by doing research on the minority groups involved in the
study. Historical events that took place in each minority group, family upbringing, educational
success, and the factors of educational success were researched. After reviewing the appropriate
and relevant literature, research continued to explore the educational gap among the minority
groups.
Various websites were visited and reviewed. A questionnaire and an Adolescent Assent
form were created, and the questionnaire was piloted to a sample of four Asian American,
African American, and Hispanic high school seniors, corrected and tested again by the sample to
ensure validity and reliability. The valid and reliable questionnaire questions were asked to high
school, 18 year old, seniors of Asian American, African American, and Hispanic cultures. These
individuals attend a high school in a large urban school district in Texas involved in the study.
The result of the pilot noted terminology issues that were resolved with discussion and input
from the student participants to ensure clarity and understanding of the questions. Once the
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 61/112
50
questionnaires were completed, the answers were placed in SPSS to note the differences among
the students. Once the differences were noted, this datum was used to compare minority groups’
passing rate on their Exit-Level TAKS test to determine possible relationships between the
factors being tested and their academic achievement.
By doing this, it was apparent what factors may contribute to or hinder the academic
success of Asian American, African American, and Hispanic students. These factors became the
prescriptions for the other minority groups in order to gain educational excellence.
Data Collection and Recording
To assure confidentiality, the student completing the questionnaire did not have to log-on
to the computer to complete the questionnaire. They were given a paper questionnaire and asked
not to place their names on the document. If the student placed their name on the document, then
those questionnaires were thrown out and not used in the research. The results from the
demographic section of the questionnaire were used to correlate the TAKS scores based on
demographics. For example, African-American students’ answers to the questionnaire were
correlated with African-American students’ Exit-Level TAKS scores. The preface of the
questionnaire included a brief discussion of what the research is about, what the findings are
intended to do and grant confidentiality of the respondent. After the data were collected they
were stored in a secure location in a bank safe deposit box for 7 years. After 7 years, the data will
be destroyed by way of incineration.
Data Analysis
The statistical analysis method of One-Way ANOVA was used to analyze the
information gathered from the respondents’ answers to the questionnaire that dealt with the
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 62/112
51
factors of parental involvement, time spent on homework frequency of individual study modes,
and frequency of group study modes to discover what may determine academic success of Asian
American, African American, and Hispanic students. Each answer was coded with a particular
number (1: Never, 2: Rarely, 3: Sometimes, 4: Often, 5: Very Often, 6: Always) to be entered
into SPSS to determine which factor occurs most often among the minority groups. The Exit-
Level TAKS scores were used to measure and connect success to the respondents’ answers on
the questionnaire.
Summary
The procedure detailed in this chapter establishes differences among Asian American,
African American, Hispanic students with respect to parental involvement, time spent on
homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes. By
determining which factors have the greatest impact for each minority group will establish
guidelines for educational leaders to follow to produce academically successful students.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 63/112
Chapter IV
Analysis of Data
The purpose of the study was to determine the differences among Asian American,
Hispanic, and African American students with respect to parental involvement, time spent on
homework frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes. Through
the use of a questionnaire given to 18 year old, high school seniors, data was collected to
determine which factor, occurred most frequently among the minority groups to determine which
factors are related to the academic achievement among the minority groups. The results of the
questionnaire given to the respondents acknowledged which factors were practiced most
frequently which may explain what impacts the academic achievement of minority students.
The five high schools involved in the study were located in southeast Texas in two large
urban school districts. Each high school had between 260-850 seniors. The results of Asian
American students involved in the study must be viewed in light of the small numbers.
Demographics from campus are detailed in Table 4.0
Table 4.0
2006 – 2007 Campus Demographics Percentages for the Campuses involved in the Study. (TEA
2006 – 2007 AEIS Report)
Campus Asian American African American Hispanic
Campus 1 0.2% 82.7% 14.5%Campus 2 6.0% 35.8% 11.5%
Campus 3 1.5% 90.8% 5.5%Campus 4 2.1% 32.2% 54.1%
Campus 5 0.2% 7.3% 87.1%
52
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 64/112
53
Quantitative data obtained from questionnaire given to 18-year old high school seniors
were used to find if there are differences among the minority groups (Asian American, African
American, and Hispanic) on the basis of parental involvement, time spent on homework,
frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes. Students were asked
to rank (1: Never, 2: Rarely, 3: Sometimes, 4: Often, 5: Very Often, 6: Always) the influences of
parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of individual study modes, and
frequency of group study modes. In order to determine which factors among the minority groups
that may have had an impact on their academic achievement, standard deviation, mean, and
significance level of p ≤ 0.05 were used to determine if differences existed among Asian
American, African American, and Hispanic students for parental involvement, time pent of
homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes.
A One-Way ANOVA was utilized to determine if differences existed among the minority
groups regarding the factors being compared. A comparison was done among the minority
groups based on the outcomes of their responses on the questionnaire. Another comparison was
done with the students’ TAKS scores and the results from the questionnaire to note possible
connections between the factors tested and the student academic achievement as measured by the
TAKS Exit-Level test. The significance level used in this study was p ≤ 0.05.
The students’ responses to the questions that pertained to each of the factors were
compiled. Standard deviation was viewed for each question to determine how the responses to
the questions deviated among the minority groups with respect to the factors being tested. The
mean was viewed to see how often students of the ethnic groups chose a particular response to
answer the questionnaire questions. Finally, the significance level was used to determine the
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 65/112
54
statistical significance of the differences among the minority groups with respect to each factor.
The following research questions were generated to determine if the factors being
investigated have any bearing on the academic achievement of Asian American, African
American and Hispanic students by using the students’ state standardized, achievement test
scores (TAKS scores) as a measure of academic achievement.
1. How do Asian American, Hispanic, and African American students at selected high
schools compare with respect to frequency of individual study modes, frequency of
group study modes, time spent doing homework, and parental involvement?
2. What are the differences when studying English, Math, Science and Social Studies
among Asian American, Hispanic, and African students with respect to frequency
of individual study modes, frequency of group study modes, time spent doing
homework?
The respondents from the selected urban high schools rated the influence of each questionnaire
question that pertained to the factors of parental involvement, time spent on homework,
frequency of individual study modes and frequency of group study modes. The self-reported
information is valid due to source from which it comes. Since the answers were taken from the
students first-hand, the responses to the questionnaire are valid and reliable.
To analyze the quantitative data, the following weights were given to the ratings of each
question on the questionnaire that the student respondents answered: 6 for “always”, 5 for “very
often”, 4 for “often”, 3 for “sometimes”, 2 for “rarely”, 1 for “never”. Computations for the
means were based on these assigned values.
The impact of the factors on the students’ academic achievement was determined by the
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 66/112
55
results from the responses to the questionnaire questions by the student respondents. A frequency
table displayed how many students from each ethnic group participated in the study, and how
often the ratings occurred for each question that pertained to each factor.
Findings
The ratings given by the student respondents for each factor, parental involvement, time
spent on homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes,
were inputted into SPSS version 13.0, and the mean, standard deviation and significant levels
were computed for each question by ethnic groups, Asian/Pacific Islander, African American,
Hispanic, and Native American. A one-way ANOVA was used to compute the difference among
the ethnic groups with respect to the factors being tested. An analysis was conducted and
decisions were made whether to not reject or reject the null hypothesis for each comparison of
the significance levels. The questions on the questionnaire that pertained to parental
involvement, time spent on homework, individual study modes and group study modes were
created based on the research in Chapter II. Students were asked eight parental involvement
questions, six time on task questions, four individual study modes and four group study modes
questions that may have influenced their academic achievement based on the student
respondents’ ratings. The ratings were compiled and the results of the subsequent computations
for the mean, standard deviations and one-way ANOVA are located in Tables 4.2 – 4.8.
The TAKS scores used in the study are the 2007 Exit-Level TAKS scores. The
participants in the study took this test their junior year of high school. Therefore, the scores used
in the study, are the scores of the participants in the study. The minority groups (Asian
American, Hispanic and African American) and the campus score are focused on in the
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 67/112
56
following table (Table 4.1). The TAKS scores indicate the different success levels among the
minority groups and campus involved in the study. This is displayed in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1
2007 Exit-Level TAKS passing percentages for each campus involved in the study.(TEA AEIS Report, 2006 - 2007)
Campus Campus Score Asian American Hispanic AfricanAmerican
Campus 1 44% * 34% 46%
Campus 2 73% 90% 63% 57%Campus 3 56% * 22% 57%Campus 4 62% 84% 59% 59%
Campus 5 57% * 59% 35%
* Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality
The campus scores for each campus of predominately minority students, range from 40% to
70%. Depending on the campus, each minority group performed differently. However, Asian
Americans outperformed both Hispanic and African American students. Those campuses that
have reported scores for Asian Americans, have more than a 25% difference between Asian
American, Hispanic and African American student TAKS scores. Those campuses (Campus 2
and Campus 4) that had reported Asian American TAKS scores had highest campus scores
among the five campuses, and the highest Hispanic and African American passing rates.
The total mean for the ratings of the minority groups (Asian Americans, Hispanics and
African Americans) with respect to parental involvement is 25.29, time spent on homework is
9.63, individual study modes is 11.14 and group study mode is 8.22. In Table 4.2, the means
among gender, minority group and the factors tested are shown.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 68/112
57
Table 4.2
Descriptive Statistics (Compare Means) on Parental involvement, Time Spent on Homework,
Frequency of Individual Study Modes, and Frequency Group Study Modes based on Ethnicityand Gender
_____________________________________________________________________________
_
Factors Gender Asian American Hispanic African
American
Parental
Involvement
Male 27.70 (N=10) 23.62 (N=122) 25.65 (N=146)
Female 20.67 (N=9) 24.06 (N=101) 26.42 (N=177)Total 24.37 (N=19) 23.82 (N=223) 26.08 (N=323)
Time Spent onHomework
(Hours per week)
Male 9.55 (N=11) 9.02 (N=124) 10.14 (N=148)Female 10.33 (N=9) 9.38 (N=100) 9.63 (N=189)
Total 9.90 (N=20) 9.18 (N=224) 9.86
(N= 337)
Frequency of
Individual Study
Modes
Male 12.64 (N=11) 10.24 (N=129) 10.86 (N=152)
Female 11.89 (N=9) 11.24 (N=103) 11.74 (N=193)
Total 12.30 (N=20) 10.76 (N=232) 11.36 (N=345)
Frequency of
Groups StudyModes
Male 8.00 (N=11) 8.05 (N=129) 7.88 (N=152)
Female 12.89 (N=9) 8.73 (N=103) 8.34 (N=193)Total 10.20 (N=20) 8.35 (N=232) 8.12 (N=345)
_____________________________________________________________________________
_
Asian American males and African American females tend to have more parental involvement
than any other gender and minority group pairing. In the area of time spent on homework,
African American males and Asian American females tend to spend more time on their
homework. When the students from the minority groups study, Asian American males and
females study individually most often than any other pairings, even though Asian American
females study most often in groups than individually. Hispanic males study in groups more than
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 69/112
58
any other male groups studied.
When looking at the minority groups with the genders combined, African American
(26.08) students tend to have more parental involvement than Asian American (24.37) and
Hispanic (23.82) students. Asian American (9.90) students also spend more time studying than
any other minority group. When modes of study are considered, Asian Americans tend to study
most often in groups (10.20) and individually (12.30) than Hispanic and African American
students.
Although there are differences in the means of the minority groups, gender and the
factors being tested, it is important to investigate the statistical significance of the factors among
the groups. This statistical significance between groups is detailed in Table 4.3.
Table 4.3
One-Way ANOVA on Parental Involvement, Times Spent on Homework, Frequency of
Individual Study Modes, and Frequency of Group Study Modes
Factors df Sig.
Parental Involvement Between GroupsWithin Groups
Total
2563
565
0.005*
Time Spent onHomework
Between GroupsWithin Groups
Total
2579
581
0.041*
Frequency of
Individual Study
Modes
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
2
595
597
0.336
Frequency of Group
Study Modes
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
2
595
597
0.102
*P is significant at the .05 level
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 70/112
59
The statistical significance of the differences were located between Hispanic and African
Americans regarding parental involvement and time spent on homework. The statistical
significance among Asian American, African American and Hispanic students is revealed inTable 4.4.
Table 4.4
One-Way ANOVA (Mean Difference) on Parental Involvement and Time Spent on Homework
based on Ethnicity
Factors Ethnicity Mean Difference Sig.
Parental Involvement Asian American
Hispanic .55 0.78African American -1.72 0.37
HispanicAsian American -0.55 .78
African American -2.26* .001*
Time Spent on
Homework
Asian American
Hispanic 0.72 0.31
African American 0.05 0.70
Hispanic
Asian American -0.72 0.31African American -0.67* 0.01*
*The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
Among the three minority groups, there are no statistically significant differences with respect to
parental involvement, time spent on homework, individual study modes and group study modes.
However, there is a statistically significant difference between Hispanic and African American
students with respect to parental involvement and time spent on homework. The differences that
do exist are very small, and may not have any impact on the academic achievement of the low
performing students. Although there are differences among the factors and the minority groups
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 71/112
60
studied, the amount of parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of individual
study modes and frequency of group study modes that the students endure are low. Not one
minority group has a significant amount of difference of each factor. Instead, the amount of each
factor, with respect to each minority group, covers the low end of the questionnaire responses.
Tables 4.5 – 4.8 detail this phenomenon. Table 4.5 details the individual questions and the mean,
standard deviation and the significant levels of the students’ responses in the parental
involvement section of the questionnaire by comparing means and using a one-way ANOVA.
Table 4.5
One-Way ANOVA and Comparing Means of Parental Involvement Among Ethnic GroupsQuestionnaire (N=566)
Parental InvolvementQuestions
Ethnicity Mean Std.Deviation
Sig.
How often did your
parents/guardians read to
you when you were a child?
Asian/Pacific Islander
Hispanic
African American
3.10
3.04
3.24
1.29
1.35
1.52
0.001
*
In elementary, how often
did your parents/guardians
visit the school to assist
teachers and other educators with school-
related activities?
Asian/Pacific Islander
Hispanic
African
American
2.75
3.23
3.38
1.33
1.57
1.60
0.178
How often did your
parents/guardians select
your teachers?
Asian/Pacific Islander
Hispanic
African
American
2.55
1.83
2.15
1.82
1.21
1.42
.011*
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 72/112
61
Table 4.5 continuation
One-Way ANOVA and Comparing Means of Parental Involvement Among Ethnic
Groups Questionnaire (N=566)
Parental Involvement
Questions
Ethnicity Mean Std.
Deviation
Sig.
How often did your
parents/guardians attend
parent conferencesconcerning you with
teachers and other school
officials about somethingnegative?
Asian/Pacific Islander
Hispanic
African
American
2.70
2.74
3.00
1.72
1.58
1.65
.000
How often did your
parents/guardians attend parent conferences
concerning you with
teachers and/or other schoolofficials about something
positive?
Asian/Pacific Islander
Hispanic
AfricanAmerican
3.11
3.21
3.64
1.37
1.56
1.64
.000
How often did your parent/guardians attend academic
or extra-curricular events inwhich you were involved?
Asian/Pacific Islander
Hispanic
African
American
3.75
3.49
3.90
1.83
1.73
1.73
.000
How often did your
parents/guardians impose
time limits on activities thatdid not deal with school
assignments or activities?
Asian/Pacific Islander
Hispanic
African
American
2.75
2.82
2.87
1.55
1.46
1.55
.422
*P is significant at the 0.05 level
In the parental involvement section on the questionnaire, the responses of the Asian Americans,
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 73/112
62
Hispanics, and African American respondents had a mean that was centered around the
responses of “3: sometimes” and “2: rarely.” With this in mind, the parental involvement among
the Asian Americans, Hispanic, and African American students varied slightly. However, there
is a statistically significant difference between Hispanic and African American students with
respect to parental involvement. For some questions, each minority group reported more parental
involvement in some questions more frequently than the others. Nonetheless, parental
involvement among minority groups does not differ by much.
In Table 4.6, Asian American, Hispanic, and African American students reported not
having spent much time studying homework in their core subject areas of English, Math,
Science, and Social Studies. There are statistically significant differences between in the area of
time spent on homework; specifically between Hispanic and African American students. All
responses to studying homework had a combined mean that centered around the response of “1:
0-4 hours.” The students also reported not having a specified time study or complete work.
Another, element of this area is that the respondents spend more time participating in activities
that are not school related. These activities could include, watching television or talking on the
telephone. For this question, the mean of the responses by the Asian American, Hispanic, and
African American students was “4: often and 3: sometimes.” In Table 4.6, the mean, standard
deviation and the significance level of the respondents’ answers to the Time Spent on Homework
section of the questionnaire are exhibited.
There are small variations in the amount of time minority students spend on homework.
Most of the time they have outside of school is spent doing activities that are non-school related.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 74/112
63
Table 4.6
One-Way ANOVA and Compare Means of Time Spent on Homework Among Ethnic Groups
Questionnaire (N=582)
Time Spent on Homework Questions
Ethnicity Mean Std.Deviation
Sig.
Did you have a specified timeto study or complete
homework?
Asian/PacificIslander
Hispanic
African
American
1.65
1.63
1.70
0.48
0.48
0.45
0.034*
How many hours per week
do you presently spend doing
English homework?
Asian/Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
AfricanAmerican
1.50
1.31
1.40
0.68
0.67
0.83
0.078*
How many hours per week
do you presently spend doingMath homework?
Asian/Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
African
American
1.40
1.45
1.43
0.75
0.83
0.92
0.014*
How many hours per week
do you presently spend doing
Science homework?
Asian/Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
AfricanAmerican
1.30
1.33
1.37
0.65
0.74
0.87
0.170
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 75/112
64
Table 4.6 continuation
One-Way ANOVA and Compare Means of Time Spent on Homework Among Ethnic
Groups Questionnaire (N=582)
Time Spent on Homework
Questions
Ethnicity Mean Std,
Deviation
Sig.
How many hours per week
do you presently spend doingSocial Studies homework?
Asian/Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
African
American
1.55
1.37
1.48
0.94
0.85
1.02
0.210
How often did you participate
in activities that were not
school related?
Asian/Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
African
American
4.15
3.78
4.17
1.42
1.55
1.58
.000*
*P is significant at the 0.05 level
Considering the fact that Asian American, Hispanic and African American students spent
between 0-4 hours studying English, Math, Science and Social Studies, it is important to know
how they study. Table 4.7 and 4.8 explain how frequently Asian American, Hispanic, and
African American students study individually or in groups for each core subject area—English,
Math, Science and Social Studies.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 76/112
65
Table 4.7
One-Way ANOVA and Compare Means of Frequency of Individual Study Modes Among Ethnic
Groups Questionnaire (N=598)
Frequency of IndividualStudy Modes Questions
Ethnicity Mean Std.Deviation
Sig.
How frequently do youstudy English alone?
Asian/PacificIslander
Hispanic
African
American
2.90
2.77
2.99
1.48
1.52
1.75
0.304
How frequently do you
study Math alone?
Asian/Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
AfricanAmerican
3.40
2.78
2.77
1.56
1.60
1.69
0.580
How frequently do you
study Science alone?
Asian/Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
African
American
3.15
2.56
2.69
1.46
1.60
1.64
0.346
How often to do you study
Social Studies alone?
Asian/Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
AfricanAmerican
2.85
2.67
2.90
1.49
1.63
1.76
0.638
*P is significant at the 0.05 level
When studying each core subject area alone, each minority group reported to studying alone, “2:
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 77/112
66
rarely and 3: sometimes.” There are small differences in what subject the minority groups study
alone. For example, Asian American students study Science and Math alone more often than
English and Social Studies; whereas African Americans study English and Social Studies alone
more often than Science and Math. Hispanic students tend to study English and Math alone more
often than Science and Social Studies. Like the other factors, there may be some differences in
how frequently the minority students study each core subject alone, but the differences continue
to be slight.
Table 4.8
One-Way ANOVA and Compare Means of Frequency of Group Study Modes Among EthnicGroups Questionnaire (N=598)
Frequency of Group StudyMode Questions
Ethnicity Mean Std.Deviation
Sig.
How often do you study
English in a group?
Asian/Pacific Islander
Hispanic
African
American
2.30
2.11
2.03
1.21
1.24
1.22
0.555
How often do you study Math
in a group?
Asian/Pacific Islander
Hispanic
African
American
3.00
2.24
2.06
1.94
1.39
1.30
0.022*
How often do you study Social
Studies in a group?
Asian/Pacific Islander
Hispanic
African American
2.35
1.96
2.02
1.30
1.18
1.33
0.428
*P is significant at the 0.05 Level.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 78/112
67
When Asian American, Hispanic and African Americans study each core subject area in groups,
the frequency is similar to the frequency of studying the core subject areas alone. The
respondents mean for each frequency of group study mode question was centered on the
responses of “2: rarely and 3: sometimes.” According to the mean in Tables 4.6 and 4.7, it is
important to note that most minority students prefer studying alone than in groups. However,
when they do study in groups, Asian Americans tend to study the subjects of Math and Science
more often in groups than English and Social Studies, Hispanic students study Math and English
in groups more often than Science and Social Studies, and African Americans study English and
Math in groups more often than Science and Social Studies.
Summary
The study utilized a quantitative design to determine the differences among Asian
American, Hispanic, and African American students with respect to the factors of parental
involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of individual study modes and frequency of
group study modes. It also sought to acknowledge their academic success on the Texas state
standardize, achievement test (TAKS test) to compare the factors to the academic achievement
among minority groups.
A Likert-type questionnaire that contained 26 questions divided unequally among five
sections, Demographics (4 questions), Parental Involvement (8 questions), Time Spent on
Homework (6 questions), Frequency of Individual Study Modes (4 questions) and Frequency of
Group Study Modes (4 questions). Each question, with the exception of four questions, was
weighted on a 6 point scale: 1: never, 2: rarely, 3: sometimes, 4: often, 5: very often, and 6: very
often. The respondents of the questionnaire consisted of Asian American, Hispanic, African
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 79/112
68
American, White, and Native American 18-year old high school seniors from 5 different urban
high school campuses in the state of Texas. However, the questionnaires of the Asian American,
Hispanic, and African American students were used.
The responses from the 713 questionnaires were inputted SPSS and descriptive statistics
and One-way ANOVAs for each factor and minority group were calculated. The descriptive
statistics identified the differences in means and standard deviation for each factor and minority
group. The one-way ANOVA identified the level of differences that existed among the minority
groups with respect to the factors of parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency
of individual study modes and frequency of group study modes with the significance level of p ≤
0.05. The analysis in the study resulted in not-rejecting the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis
regarding the parental involvement and time spent on homework of Hispanic and African
American students were rejected.
Ho1 – There are no statistically significant differences among Asian American, Hispanic, and
African American students with respect to self-reported parental involvement, time spent
on English homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group
study modes. (Reject—Parental Involvement and Time Spent on English Homework
between Hispanic and African American Students. Not Reject—Frequency of Individual
and Group Study Modes)
Ho2 - There are no statistically significant differences among Asian American, Hispanic, and
African American students with respect to self-reported parental involvement, time spent
on Mathematics homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group
study modes. (Reject—Parental Involvement and Time Spent on Mathematics Homework
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 80/112
69
between Hispanic and African American Students. Not Reject—Frequency of Individual
and Group Study Modes)
Ho3 - There are no statistically significant differences among Asian American, Hispanic, and
African American students with respect to self-reported parental involvement, time spent
on Science homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group
study modes. (Reject—Parental Involvement and Time Spent on Science Homework
between Hispanic and African American Students. Not Reject—Frequency of Individual
and Group Study Modes)
Ho4 - There are no statistically significant differences among Asian American, Hispanic, and
African American students with respect to self-reported parental involvement, time spent
on Social Studies homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of
group study modes. (Reject—Parental Involvement and Time Spent on Social Studies
Homework between Hispanic and African American Students. Not Reject—Frequency of
Individual and Group Study Modes)
In conclusion, there are no statistically significant differences among Asian American
and Hispanic students as well as Asian American and African American students with respect to
parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of individual study modes and
frequency of group study modes. There is, however, a statistically significant difference among
Hispanics and African Americans with regard to parental involvement and time spent on
homework. Although there are no statistically significant differences; slight differences exist
among the minority students with respect to the factors tested. For example, according to Table
4.2, African American students have more parental involvement than Hispanic and Asian
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 81/112
70
Americans, but the difference was not significant, Asian Americans tend to study more than
Hispanics and African Americans and each group prefers to study individually; however, the
minority students study each core subject area differently with respect to frequency and modes.
If the minority students’ responses to the questionnaire have any bearing on their academic
success, then the factors tested in the study, parental involvement, time spent on homework,
individual study modes and group study modes, may impact the academic achievement of Asian
American, Hispanic, and African American students.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 82/112
Chapter V
Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations
Summary
The study aimed to determine the differences among Asian American, Hispanic, and
African American students with respect to parental involvement, time spent on homework,
frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes. Literature suggested
that some Asian American students enjoy academic achievement due to the amount of parental
involvement included their educational career. African Americans and Hispanics, on the other
hand, did not have as much parental involvement; therefore, they suffered academically. Other
factors that the literature explained as having an impact on the academic achievement of Asian
American students were time spent on homework and the frequency in the mode of study.
All three out of the four areas were performed more often by Asian Americans than
Hispanics and African Americans. However, the data showed no statistically significant
difference among the minority with respect to the factors tested; except in the areas of parental
involvement and time spent on homework between Hispanic and African American students.
The research questions that guided this study are:
1. How do Asian American, Hispanic, and African American students at selected high
schools compare with respect to parental involvement, time spent on homework,
frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes?
2. What are the differences when studying English, Math, Science, and Social Studies
among Asian American, Hispanic, and African American students with respect to
frequency of individual study modes, frequency of group study modes and time
71
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 83/112
72
spent doing homework?
Based on the research questions, the following Null Hypotheses were formed:
Ho1 – There are no statistically significant difference among Asian American, Hispanic, and
African American students with respect to parental involvement, time spent on English
homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes.
(Refers to research question 1 and 2)
Ho2 - There are no statistically significant difference among Asian American, Hispanic, and
African American students with respect to parental involvement, time spent on Math
homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes.
(Refers to research question 1 and 2)
Ho3 - There are no statistically significant difference among Asian American, Hispanic, and
African American students with respect to parental involvement, time spent on Science
homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes.
(Refers to research question 1 and 2)
Ho4 - There are no statistically significant difference among Asian American, Hispanic, and
African American students with respect to parental involvement, time spent on Social
Studies homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study
modes. (Refers to research question 1 and 2)
Summary of Findings
The purpose of the study was to determine the differences among Asian American,
Hispanic, and African American students with regard to parental involvement, time spent on
homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes. It is
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 84/112
73
possible that subgroups that exist within each minority group had influence on the outcome of
the study. However, the study focused only on the broad minority groups. In the region of Texas
where this study was conducted, the prominent subgroups are Vietnamese, Chinese, Korean
Japanese, Mexicans, Latin and South Americans, Haitians and Nigerians.
The students’ scores on the TAKS test were used to acknowledge the differences in
academic success among the minority groups. The factors tested in the study may have bearing
on the students’ academic success as shown by the students’ TAKS test scores. Quantitative data
was collected by way of a questionnaire and analyzed using one-way ANOVA to determine the
differences among Asian American, Hispanic, and African American students with respect to
parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of individual study modes, and
frequency of group study modes.
The results obtained from the questionnaire and completed by the student respondents
indicated that though there are no statistically significant differences in the parental involvement,
time spent on homework, frequency of individual study modes, and frequency of group study
modes among the minority groups, there are a statistically significant differences in the parental
involvement and time spent on homework of Hispanic and African American students once a
one-way ANOVA was administered on the data. The students’ TAKS scores indicated a
significant difference in passing rates among the minority groups. Therefore, the results from the
questionnaire may explain the variance in the TAKS scores among the races.
Although the study found that there were no statistically significant difference among the
minority groups with respect to parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of
individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes, there some slight differences as
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 85/112
74
noted in Chapter IV Findings. Due to the findings in Chapter IV, the researcher made the
following conclusions:
1. Asian American students reportedly study Science and Math alone more often than
English and Social Studies; whereas African Americans reportedly study English
and Social Studies alone more often than Science and Math. Hispanic students
reportedly tend to study English and Math alone more often than Science and Social
Studies.
2. When studying in groups, Asian Americans reportedly tend to study the subjects of
Math and Science more often than English and Social Studies, Hispanic students
reportedly study Math and English in groups more often than Science and Social
Studies, and African Americans reportedly study English and Math in groups more
often than Science and Social Studies.
3. Asian American, Hispanic, and African American students reported not having
spent much time studying homework in their core subject areas of English, Math,
Science, and Social Studies. However, most of the time they have outside of school
is spent doing activities that are non-school related.
4. The parental involvement among the Asian Americans, Hispanic, and African
American students varied slightly. However, there is a statistically significant
difference between Hispanic and African American students with respect to
parental involvement.
5. Asian American males and African American females reportedly tend to have more
parental involvement than any other gender and ethnic group relationships.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 86/112
75
Although as a group, African Americans reportedly have more parental
involvement.
6. Asian American males and females reportedly study individually most often than
any other groupings even though Asian American females study most often in
groups than individually. Hispanic males reportedly study in groups more than any
other male group studied.
Discussion
Based on the research that was conducted, the small differences that do exist among the
minority groups with respect to parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of
individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes, are not enough to determine which
factor impacts the academic achievement of Asian American, Hispanic, and African American
students. The results of the study may be a result of the like socio-economic statuses among the
minority groups. The TAKS passing rates among the minority groups have great variance, and to
determine which factor could have impacted those scores the most would be reduced only to a
guess because the small variance among those factors. The difference in cultural and social
beliefs and values may contribute to or hinder the academic achievement of the minority groups.
The literature mentioned that the Confucianism belief and values that are strong in the Asian
American community may have a strong impact on their drive to succeed. What is unfortunate is
the fact that African American males study more than any other group; however, they continue to
be low-performing. Therefore, other factors may be responsible for the academic success of the
minority groups.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 87/112
76
Recommendations
The research gathered in this study indicated that there was no statistically significant
difference among Asian American and Hispanic students as well as Asian American and African
American students with respect to parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of
individual study modes, and frequency of group study modes. There was, however, a statistically
significant differences between Hispanic and African American students with respect to parental
involvement and time spent on homework. It is evident that minority students have similar
influence from the factors. The following are recommendations for individuals involved in the
field of education, such as principals, superintendents, legislators, commissioners, parents, and
foundations that donate money to educational needs:
1. Many students do not know how to study effectively, therefore they do not study.
Teachers may need to implement the use of effective study habits in order for
students to learn content at their optimal level.
2. Even though parents may feel uncomfortable or apprehensive about getting
involved in their child’s school and education, parents need to take an active,
participatory role in the education of their child. When schools attempt to reach out
to parents, parents need to be willing to meet schools half way. A good way for
parents to help out with their child’s education is for them to ask their child to
explain their homework or daily activities at school to them to evaluate their child’s
understanding of what they are learning. Parents also need to keep in mind that it is
their job to raise their children and the school’s job to educate their children.
3. Policies and standards that are created and implemented on the state and district
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 88/112
77
levels need to always accommodate the students and not the interest or agenda of
lobbyists, bureaucrats, or unions. Also when creating state test, the understanding
that not all students are the same need to be taken into account. For example, not
every student comes from homes that are highly educated, two-parent, upper-
middle to upper class that expose their children to items outside their
neighborhoods.
4. When donating money, educational foundations that award grants need to ensure
that the programs that a district is implementing serves an intricate detail in the
education of all students. For example, grants to enhance the teaching and
understanding of a core subject area, attract minorities to core subject areas that
otherwise they would knot approach, such as calculus or anatomy. Districts and
schools need to search and apply for grants that cater to the intricate issues that
affect all of their students.
5. The standardized tests that are used in education need to be modified to adequately
test students of every race, ethnicity and background. The standardized tests should
not be so demanding that educators and districts only teach students how to take
that particular test, and spend money to improve teachers’ ability to teach how to
take a test and students’ ability to take a test.
Recommendations for Further Study
In accordance with the results on the study, the researcher recommends the following for
further study:
1. A study should be conducted to investigate individual test scores to be compared
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 89/112
78
to the impact of parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of
individual study modes and frequency of group study modes on individual students.
2. The study should also include a qualitative component such as interviews to
introduce the importance of cultural and social beliefs and values on minority
students’ education.
3. A study should also be conducted to investigate a difference among minority
groups in urban and rural school districts with respect to parental involvement, time
spent on homework, frequency of individual study modes and frequency of group
study modes with a comparison of cultural and social beliefs and values between
the students enrolled in the urban and suburban school districts.
4. A study should also be conducted to include a qualitative component of parents
and their children and their insight on what impacts the academic achievement of
their child based on parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of
individual study modes, frequency of group study modes, cultural and social beliefs
and values.
Conclusion
In conclusion, according the data, there are no statistically significant differences among
Asian American and Hispanic students as well as Asian American and African American
students with respect to parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of individual
study modes and frequency of group study modes. There are statistically significant differences
between Hispanic and African American students with respect to parental involvement and time
spent on homework. Although there are no statistically significant differences among Asian
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 90/112
79
American and Hispanic students as well as Asian American and African American students with
respect to parental involvement, time spent on homework, frequency of individual study modes
and frequency of group study modes, Asian American students continue to outperform Hispanic
and African American students academically, according to the TAKS test.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 91/112
80
References
Academic excellence indicator system. (AEIS, 2007) Retrieved May 28, 2008, from Texas
Education Agency (TEA) Website: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis/index.html
Bennett, A., Bridglall, B. L., Everson, H. T., Cauce, A. M., Gordon, E. W., Lee, C. D., et al.
(2004, Fall). A Report of the National Study Group for the Affirmative Development of
Academic Ability. All student reaching the top: strategies for closing academic
achievement gaps, 1-41.
Bhattacharyya, S. (2001, November). From 'yellow peril’ to 'model minority': The transition of
Asian Americans. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational
Research Association, Little Rock, AR.
Cammarota, J. (2006, Fall). Disappearing in the houdini education: The experience of race and
invisibility among latina/o students. Multicultural Education, 14(1), 2- 0.
Chubb, J. (2002) Bridging the achievement gap. Washington, D.C.: Brooking Institution Press.
Clark, A. A., & Dorris, A. (2007, March). Welcoming latino parents as partners. Education
Digest, 72(1), 44 - 50.
College Board (1999). Reaching the top: A report of the national task force on minority high
achievement . New York: (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED435765).
Crawford, C (2000). Racial promotion and through racial exclusion. Society. 37(5), 37-43.
Retrieved February 23, 2006, from ERIC Educational database.
Daniels, H., & Bizar, M. (2005). Teaching the best practice way: Methods that matter k - 12.
York, ME: Stenhouse.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 92/112
81
Decoker, G. (2002). National standards and school reform in Japan and the United States.
Williston, VT: Teachers College Press.
Doan, K. (2006, Summer). A Sociocultural perspective on at-risk Asian-American students.
Teacher Education and Special Education, 29(3), 157-167.
EdSource Online. (1999). Peers, parents and schools: How they affect school achievement .
Retrieved February 2, 2006, from EdSource Online Website:
http://www.edsource.org/pub_edfct_peers.cfm
Ellington, L. (2001). Japanese Education in Grades K-12. ERIC Digest . Retrieved January 22,
2006, from ERIC Educational Database.
Elmasry, Faiza (2005, December 28). Why do Asian American students excel in school?.
Retrieved February 23, 2006, from IMDiversity.com website:
http://www.imdiversity.com/villages/asian/education_academia_study/voa_asian_achieve
Epstein, J. et al. (2002). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action
(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Epstein, J. L., & Sanders, M. G. (2002). Family, school, and community partnerships: Vol. 5.
Handbook of parenting: Practical issues in parenting (M. H. Bornstein ed.). Mahwah,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Farkas, G. (2002). Racial disparities and discrimination: what do we know, how do we know we
know it and what do we need to know. Teachers College Record, 105(6), 1119 - 1146.
Retrieved February 23, 2006, from ERIC Educational database.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 93/112
82
Flaxman, E. (2003). Closing the achievement gap: two views from current research. ERIC
Clearinghouse on Urban Education, 3, 1-5. Retrieved February 23, 2006, from, ERIC
Educational database.
Freeman, J. (1995). What's right with schools. ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational
Management , 93, 1-5. Retrieved February 23, 2006, from, ERIC Educational database.
Gordon, E. & Smiley, T. (2006). The Covenant . Chicago, IL: Third World Press.
Gregory, S. (2000). The academic achievement of minority students. Lanham, MD: University
Press of America.
Herrington, D. (1993). Barriers, influences and leadership of selected Mexican American
administrators in south Texas education from 1970-1990. Retrieved February 23, 2006,
from, Proquest database.
Hawkins, J., & Cummings, W. (2000). Transnational competence. Albany, NY: State University
of New York Press.
Hirschman, C. & Wong, M. (1986). The extraordinary attainment of Asian Americans: a search
for historical evidence & explanations. Social Forces, 65(1), 1-27. Retrieved January 28,
2006, from, ERIC Educational database.
Hollinger, D. (2006, March). Race, politics, and the census. The Chronicle of Higher Education,
pp. B6.
Horvat, E. & O’Conner, C. (2006). Beyond acting white: Reframing the debate on black student
achievement. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 94/112
83
Ingles, S. (2002). A profile of the American high school sophomore in 2002: Initial results from
base year of the education longitudinal study of 2002. Education Statistics Quarterly, 7(1
& 2), 1-9. Retrieved February 24, 2006, from:
http://www.nces.gov/programs/quarterly/vol_7/1_2/4_9.asp
Kim, A., & Yeh, C. (2002). Stereotypes of Asian American students. ERIC Clearinghouse on
Urban Education, 4, 1-6. Retrieved January 22, 2006, from, EBSCOHost Academic
Search Premier database.
Kritsonis, W. (2005). Practical applications of educational research and basic statistics.
Mansfield, OH: Bookmasters, Incorporated.
Kritsoins, W. (2002). Schooling . Mansfield, Ohio: Bookmasters, Incorporated.
Kuhn, D. (2006, March 8). Does the Asian success formula have a downside? Education Week ,
pp. 29.
Lambert, M. (2006). 20 Ways to help high school students improve their study skills.
Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(4), 241-243. Retrieved February 23, 2006, from,
ERIC Educational database.
Le, C. N. (2001, September). A closer look at Asian Americans and
education. Retrieved February 23, 2006, from New Horizons for Learning website:
http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/multicultural/le.htmLe, C
Lee, G.-L., & Manning, M. L. (2001, Fall). Working with Asian parents and families.
Muticultural Education, 9(1), 23-25.
Lew, J. (2006, December). Burden of acting neither white nor black: Asian American identities
and achievement in urban schools. The Urban Review, 38(5), 335 - 352.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 95/112
84
Lofty, J (1995). Timescapes for literacy: time in academic communities. College Literature,
22(2), 16-32. Retrieved January 22, 2006, from EBSCOHost Academic Search Premier
database.
Malone, Patrick (2004). An exploration of the relationship between ethnicity, attention problems,
and academic achievement . The School Psychology Review, 33(4), 498-509. Retrieved
February 23, 2006, from, WilsonOmnifile database.
Marjoribanks, K (2005). Family Environments and Children's Outcomes. Educational
Psychology. 25, 647-657.
Mathematics Achievement Partnership. (2001). Foundations for Success: Mathematics for the
Middle Grades Consultation Draft.
Miranda, A., Webb, L., Brigman, G., & Peluso, P. (2007, June). Student success skills: a
promising program to close the academic achievement gap for African American and
latino students. ASCA: Professional School Counseling, 10(5), 490-497.
Noguera, P (1997). Building school and university partnerships based upon mutual benefit and
respect . Berkley, CA: Excellence Through Collaboration and Outreach Center.
Ogbu, J. (1998). Voluntary and involuntary minorities: A cultural-ecological theory of school
performance with some implications for education. Anthropology & Education
Quarterly, 29(2), 155-188. Retrieved February 23, 2006, from, ERIC Educational
database.
Park, C. (2006). Asian and Pacific American Education. Washington, D.C.: Information Age
Publishing.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 96/112
85
Paschal, R. & Weinstein, T. & Walberg, H. (1984). The effects of homework on learning: A
quantitative synthesis. Journal of Educational Research. 78(2), 97-104. Retrieved
February 23, 2006, from, ERIC Educational database.
Ramirez, A., & Carpenter, D. (2005, April). Challenging assumptions about the achievement
gap. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(8), 599 - 603.
Saunders, D. (1995). Did your mom eat your homework? schools shift blame for academic
failure to parents. Policy Review, 72, 68-72. Retrieved January 28, 2006, from, ERIC
Educational database.
Schmidt, W. (1997). A Splintered Vision. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schweingruber, W. (2002). Apples and oranges: a discussion of the use of international
comparisons in mathematics education reform. Retrieved Jan. 22, 2006, from:
http://www.math.umd.edu/~dac/650/schweingruberpaper.html
Shimahara, N., & Holowinsky, I. (2001). Ethnicity, race, and nationality in education: A global
perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shrake, E., & Rhee, S. (2004). Ethnic identity as a predictor of problem behaviors among korean
american adolescents. Adolescence, 39(155), 601-622. Retrieved February 23, 2006, from
,ERIC Educational database.
Slavin, R. (1980).Effects of student teams and peer tutoring on academic achievement and time
on-task. Journal of Experimental Education. 48(4), 252-257. Retrieved February 23,
2006, from, WilsonOmnifile database.
Sparks, B. (2002). The struggles of getting an education: Issues of power, culture and difference
for Mexican Americans of the southwest . Dekalb, IL: Educational Studies Press.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 97/112
86
Staples, B. Why the United States should look to Japan for better schools. (November 21, 2005).
The New York Times.
Steinberg, L. (1996). Beyond the classroom: why school reform has failed and what parents
need to do. New York, NY: Touchstone.
Stewart, E. B. (2007, Winter). Individual and school structural effects on African American high
school students' academic achievement. All Students Reaching the Top: Strategies for
Closing the Academic Achievement Gap, 91(2), 16 - 34.
Sui, S.& Park, C. & Goodwin, A. & Lee, S. (2001). Research on the education of Asian and
Pacific Americans. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
The Fort Gordon Equal Opportunity Office [Asian-American Experience]. (2007, March 14).
Retrieved August 16, 2008, from Fort Gordon, Army, Directorat of Human Resources,
Equal Opportunity Representative Course Website:
http://www.gordon.army.mil/eoo/asian.htm
Thernstrom, S. & Thernstrom A. (2003). No excuses: Closing the racial gap in learning . New
York: Simon & Schuster.
U. S. Department of Education (1983). National Commission on Excellence in Education: A
Nation at Risk. Retrieved January 10, 2006, from: http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/
Vaden-Kierman, N., & McManus, J. (2005). Parent and Family Involvement: 2002-2003. The
Education Statistics Quarterly. 7 , 78-86.
Wrigley, T. (2000). The power to learn: Stories in the education of Asian and other bilingual
pupils. Sterling, VA: Trentham Books.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 98/112
87
Wu, E. (2005) United States falls in international rank in education. Retrieved February 12,
2006, from Daily Collegian Website:
http://www.dailycollegian.com/media/paper874/news/2005/10/04/News/United.States.Fa
ll
Xu, J. (2004, September). Family help and homework management in urban and rural secondary
schools. Teacher's College Record, 106 (9), 1786 - 1803.
Yan, W. (2005). Parent involvement and mathematics achievement: Contrast across racial and
ethnic groups. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(2), 116-127. Retrieved January
10, 2006, from, ERIC Educational database.
Zhao, Y., Zhou, X., & Huang, L. (2008, January/February). Chinese students' knowledge and
thinking about America and China. The Social Studies, 99(1), 13 - 22.
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 99/112
88
Appendix A
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 100/112
89
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 101/112
90
Appendix B
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 102/112
91
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 103/112
92
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 104/112
93
APPENDIX C
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 105/112
94
What Influenced Your Academic Achievement?
The purpose of this survey is to look at the factors that have influenced your academic
achievement. It will take a few minutes to complete and will be completely confidential. Results
will be compiled and available upon request.
1. What race do you identify?
A. White
B. HispanicC. African American
D. Asian/Pacific Islander
E. Native American
2. What grade are you currently enrolled?
A. 12th gradeB. 11th grade – early graduate
C. 11th grade
D. 10th grade
3. What is your gender?
A. Male
B. Female
4. What class are you completing this questionnaire?
A. GovernmentB. Government Honors
C. Government Advanced Placement
D. EconomicsE. Economics - Honors
F. Economics - Advanced Placement
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 106/112
95
Section II. Parental Involvement:
Please circle the response that most closely describes your parents’/guardians’ involvement
in your educational career. (1: Never, 2: Rarely, 3: Sometimes, 4: Often, 5: Very Often,
6: Always)
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 107/112
96
Never Rarely
Some-
times Often
Very
Often Always
1. How often did your
parents/guardians read to you when
you were a child? 1 2 3 4 5 62. In elementary, how often did your
parents/guardians visit the school to
assist teachers and other educators
with school-related activities? 1 2 3 4 5 63. How often did your
parents/guardians select your teachers? 1 2 3 4 5 6
4. How often did your
parents/guardians assist you with your homework and other school –related
activities? 1 2 3 4 5 65. How often did your
parents/guardians attend parent
conferences concerning you with
teachers and other school officialsabout something negative? 1 2 3 4 5 6
6. How often did your
parents/guardians attend parentconferences concerning you with
teachers and/or other school officials
about something positive? 1 2 3 4 5 67. How often did your parent/
guardians attend academic or extra-
curricular events in which you wereinvolved? 1 2 3 4 5 6
8. How often did your
parents/guardians impose time limits
on activities that did not deal withschool assignments or activities? 1 2 3 4 5 6
Additional Comments about your Parent's Involvement in your
Education
Part III. Time Spent on Task:
Please circle the response that most closely describes the time you spent on task that impacted
your educational career.
(1: 0-4 hours 2: 5-9 hours 3: 10-14 hours 4: 15-19 hours 5: 20-24 hours, 6: 25 +)
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 108/112
97
1. Did you have a specified time to
study or complete homework?
A. YesB. No
0-4
Hours
6-9
Hours
10-14
Hours
15-19
Hours
20-24
Hours
25 +
Hours2. How many hours per week do you
presently spend doing English
homework? 1 2 3 4 5 63. How many hours per week do you
presently spend doing Math
homework? 1 2 3 4 5 64. How many hours per week do you
presently spend doing Sciencehomework? 1 2 3 4 5 65. How many hours per week do you
presently spend doing Social Studies
homework? 1 2 3 4 5 6
6. How often did you participate in
activities that were not school related?
1:
Never
2:
Rarely
3:Som
etimes
4:
Often
5:Very
Often
6:
Always
Part IV. Frequency of Individual Study Modes:
Please circle the response that most closely describes the study modes you used most often that
impacted your educational career.(1: Never, 2: Rarely, 3: Sometimes, 4: Often, 5: Very Often, 6: Always)
Never RarelySome-times Often
VeryOften Always
1. How frequently do you study
English alone? 1 2 3 4 5 62. How frequently do you study Math
alone? 1 2 3 4 5 6
3. How frequently do you study
Science alone? 1 2 3 4 5 64. How often to do you study Social
Studies alone? 1 2 3 4 5 6
Part V. Frequency of Group Study Modes:
Please circle the response that most closely describes the study modes you used most often that
impacted your educational career.
(1: Never, 2: Rarely, 3: Sometimes, 4: Often, 5: Very Often, 6: Always)
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 109/112
98
Never Rarely
Some-
times Often
Very
Often Always
5. How often do you study English ina group? 1 2 3 4 5 6
6. How often do you study Math in a
group? 1 2 3 4 5 67. How often do you study Science in
a group? 1 2 3 4 5 6
8. How often do you study Social
Studies in a group? 1 2 3 4 5 6
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 110/112
99
Appendix D
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 111/112
100
8/8/2019 Dr. Grace Nickerson, Dissertation, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dr-grace-nickerson-dissertation-dr-william-allan-kritsonis-dissertation 112/112
101
Vita
top related