rp1459 v4 - world bank documents and reports
Post on 12-Jan-2023
6 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
DIRECTORATE FOR ROADS OF VIETNAM
PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT 3
=================
RESETTLEMENT PLAN
VIET NAM ROAD ASSET MANAGEMENT PROJECT
(VRAMP)
COMPONENT C: ROAD ASSET IMPROVEMENT
C1: FOR NATIONAL HIGHWAY 39-1
(TRIEU DUONG – HUNG HA)
Prepared by:
HA NOI BRANCH OF INVESTMENT AND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION
CONSULTATION COMPANY E.P.C
Phone: (84).46.673.5808 - (84).43.748.0373
Email: hanoiepc@gmail.com
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
DIRECTORATE FOR ROADS OF VIETNAM
PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT 3
RESETTLEMENT PLAN VIET NAM ROAD ASSET MANAGEMENT PROJECT
(VRAMP)
COMPONENT C: ROAD ASSET IMPROVEMENT
C1: FOR NATIONAL HIGHWAY 39-1
(TRIEU DUONG – HUNG HA)
THE CLIENT
PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT 3
THE CONSULTANT
Hanoi, June - 2013
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 8
1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 10
1.1. THE VIETNAM ROAD ASSET MANAGEMENT PROJECT ............................................................. 10
1.2. DESCRIPTION OF SECTION TRIEU DUONG – HUNG HA OF THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY 39-1 ....... 11
1.3. EFFORTS IN MINIMIZING LAND ACQUISITION IMPACTS. ............................................................ 15
2. LAND ACQUISITION IMPACTS ......................................................................................... 16
2.1. METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................... 16
2.2. SUMMARY OF PROJECT AFFECTED QUANTITY ......................................................................... 17
2.3. IMPACTS ON LANDS .................................................................................................................. 18
2.4. IMPACTS ON BUILDING AND SUB-ASSETS.................................................................................. 21
2.5. IMPACTS ON CROPS AND TREES ................................................................................................ 25
2.6. IMPACTS ON PUBLIC WORKS ..................................................................................................... 26
2.7. IMPACTS ON WOMEN HEADED HOUSEHOLDS ............................................................................ 27
3. SOCIOECONOMIC PROFILES ........................................................................................... 30
3.1. OVERVIEW OF PROJECT SOCIO-ECONOMIC SITUATION .............................................................. 30
3.2. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF DPS .................................................................................. 31
4. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ENTITLEMENT POLICY ................................................ 40
4.1. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................ 40
4.2. ENTITLEMENT POLICY .............................................................................................................. 45
5. RESETTLEMENT ................................................................................................................... 52
6. INCOME RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION ...................................................... 52
6.1. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................... 52
6.2. ANALYSIS OF DEMAND ............................................................................................................. 52
6.3. IMPLEMENTATION ISSUE .......................................................................................................... 54
6.4. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ........................................................................................................... 55
6.5. IMPLEMENTATION BUDGET ...................................................................................................... 56
7. CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION, INFPORMATION DISCLOSURE ........... 57
7.1. OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ...................................................................................................... 57
7.2. CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION PROCEDURE .................................................................. 58
7.3. METHOD FOR CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION ................................................................ 58
7.4. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ..................................................................................................... 60
2
7.5. COMMUNITY CONSULTATION RESULTS ................................................................................... 60
8. COMPLAINT AND GRIEVANCES ...................................................................................... 61
9. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ................................................................................ 62
9.1. PROVINCIAL PEOPLE’S COMMITTEE (PPC) .............................................................................. 62
9.2. THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT (PMU3) ............................................................................ 63
9.3. DISTRICT PEOPLE’S COMMITTEE ............................................................................................. 64
9.4. DISTRICT COMPENSATION ASSISTANT AND RESETTLEMENT COMMITTEES (DCRC) ................ 64
9.5. COMMUNE PEOPLE'S COMMITTEES .......................................................................................... 65
9.6. EXTERNAL MONITORING AGENCY ........................................................................................... 65
10. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENT ............................................................................. 67
11. MONITORING AND EVALUATION ................................................................................... 70
11.1. INTERNAL RESETTLEMENT MONITORING................................................................................. 70
11.2. EXTERNAL RESETTLEMENT MONITORING ............................................................................... 70
12. COST AND BUDGET .............................................................................................................. 72
12.1. PRINCIPLES .............................................................................................................................. 72
12.2. REPLACEMENT COST SURVEY ................................................................................................. 73
12.3. PROPOSED COMPENSATION UNIT PRICES .................................................................................. 74
12.4. COST ESTIMATES ..................................................................................................................... 75
3
List of tables
Table 1: Names of project communes, districts ................................................................................. 13
Table 2: Summary of Land Acquisition Impacts................................................................................ 17
Table 3: Summary of Land acquisition by Location, Category and Affected households ................. 18
Table 4: No. of HHs with Affected Residential Land (in rural area with remaining area plot less than
100 m2 and in urban area with remaining area plot less than 80 m2) ................................................ 18
Table 5: Number of Affected household by Severity of Impact of Land Acquisition ....................... 19
Table 6: Average Land Holdings and Severity of Land Acquisition Impacts ................................... 20
Table 7: Summary of Impacts on Houses ........................................................................................... 21
Table 8: Affected Houses by Grade ................................................................................................... 21
Table 9: Fully affected houses and residential land by location......................................................... 22
Table 10: Impacts on shops ................................................................................................................ 23
Table 11: Affected Secondary Structures ........................................................................................... 24
Table 12: Impacts on Trees (No. of Trees) ......................................................................................... 25
Table 13: Impacts on crops ................................................................................................................. 26
Table 14: The public land and public works affected by the project ................................................. 26
Table 15: Land acquisition impacts to Households Headed by Women ............................................ 28
Table 16: Average Land Holdings and Severity of Land Acquisition Impacts with Households
Headed by Women ............................................................................................................................. 29
Table 17: Demographic Characteristics at Project Communes/Districts ........................................... 30
Table 18: Health establishments, beds and staffs by state management ............................................ 31
Table 19: Socio-economic survey scale ............................................................................................. 31
Table 20: Household size ................................................................................................................... 32
Table 21: Gender distribution of HH Member in affected communes ............................................... 33
Table 22: Education level of Household members ............................................................................. 33
Table 23: Income sources, according to communes/districts (%) ...................................................... 35
Table 24: HH income according to Project locations ( /month) ......................................................... 36
Table 25: Classification of households by income ............................................................................. 37
Table 26: Facilities of affected households ........................................................................................ 38
Table 27: House types of displaced people ........................................................................................ 38
Table 28: Water Source for Using of Affected Households ............................................................... 39
Table 29: Main gaps between compensation, assistance and resettlement policies of Government’s
and World Bank’s and proposed policies for project ......................................................................... 43
Table 30: Entitlement Matrix ............................................................................................................. 47
Table 31: Preferences of the households to the income restoration activities .................................... 53
Table 32: Steps proposed for the implementation phase of income restoration ................................. 55
Table 33: Implementation Schedule for the RP ................................................................................. 69
Table 34: Land compensation unit prices proposed for project ......................................................... 74
Table 35: Cost estimate for compensation and resettlement based on the replacement values ......... 75
Table 35. 1: Breakdown by commune ................................................................................................ 78
4
Table 35. 2: Compensation for buildings ........................................................................................... 79
Table 35. 3: Compensation for substructures ..................................................................................... 81
Table 35. 4: Compensation for trees ................................................................................................... 85
Table 35. 5: Compensation for crops.................................................................................................. 92
Table 35. 6: Compensation for public works ..................................................................................... 93
Table 35. 7: Allowances ..................................................................................................................... 98
Table 35. 8: External monitoring cost .............................................................................................. 107
Table 36: Meetings with Other Stakeholder ..................................................................................... 122
Table 37: Consultation on income restoration measures .................................................................. 123
Table 38: Meetings for a rapid survey in the replacement values .................................................... 124
Figures
Figure 1: Location of Project .............................................................................................................. 12
Figure 2: Map of the Project ............................................................................................................... 13
Figure 3: A typical cross section in non-residential area.................................................................... 16
Figure 4: A typical cross section in a residential area ........................................................................ 16
Figure 5: Some photos about public consultation and participation ................................................ 128
Annexes
ANNEX 1: THE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SURVEY OF AFFECTED
ASSETS ............................................................................................................................................ 108
ANNEX 2: PROJECT INFORMATION BOOKLET (PIB) ............................................................ 118
ANNEX 3: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS AND PICTURES OF CONSULTATION MEETINGS .. 122
ANNEX 4: DETAILED RESULTS SURVEY ON THE SUBSTITUTION COST IN EACH
COMMUNE ..................................................................................................................................... 129
5
EXCHANGE RATE
(On January 2013)
Currency Unit - Vietnamese Dong (VND)
- United States Dollars ($)
$1.00 = VND21,000
ABBREVIATION
DCRC District Compensation Assistant Resettlement Committee
DMS Detailed Measurement Survey
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EMP Environmental Management Plan
GOV Government of Viet Nam
HH Household
LURC Land Use Right Certificate
MOT Ministry of Transport
NH National Highway
RNIP Road Network Improvement Project
OP Operational Policy
PC Public Consultation
PCC Provincial Compensation Committee
PDOT Provincial Department of Transport
PID1 Project Implementation Division 1
PMU3 Project Management Unit No 3
PPC Provincial People’s Committee
RP Resettlement Plan
ROW Right-of-way
USD or $ United States Dollars
VND Vietnamese Dong
WB World Bank (including IDA)
6
GLOSSARY
Displaced person(s) People, households, or legal entities affected by project related changes in
use of land, water, natural resources, or income losses. Impact may be full
or partial, permanent or temporary physical displacement (relocation, loss
of residential land or loss of shelter) and/or economic displacement (loss of
land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means for livelihood)
resulting from (i) involuntary acquisition of land, or (ii) involuntary
restriction on land use.
Compensation Payment in cash or kind to which the affected people are entitled in order
to replace the lost asset, resource or income.
Cut-off date The Date that the project is approved and publishes broadly by the District
People’s Committee to local communities and affected people. Any
persons moving into the project area after the cut-off date will not be
entitled to compensation and assistance under the project..
Eligibility Criteria Basis used in the Project for determining if a person or entity is entitled to
be compensated or assisted in relation to land acquisition and resettlement
impacts from the Project.
Encroachers People who move into the project area after the cut-off date and are
therefore not eligible for compensation or other rehabilitation measures
provided by the project or persons who have trespassed government land,
adjacent to his/her own land or asset, to which he/she is not entitled, by
deriving his/her livelihood there. Such act is called “Encroachment.”
Entitlement Entitlement means the range of measures comprising compensation in cash
or kind, relocation cost, income rehabilitation assistance, transfer
assistance, income substitution, and business restoration which are due to
APs, depending on the type and degree nature of their losses, to restore
their social and economic base.
Household Household means all persons living and eating together as a single-family
unit and eating from the same kitchen whether or not related to each other.
The census used this definition and the data generated by the census forms
the basis for identifying the household unit.
7
Income restoration Income restoration means re-establishing income sources and livelihoods
of DPs.
Involuntary
Resettlement
Any resettlement, which does not involve willingness of the persons being
adversely affected, but are forced through an instrument of law.
Resettlement is considered involuntary when displaced individuals or
communities do not have the right to refuse land acquisition that result in
displacement.
Land acquisition Land acquisition means the process whereby a person is compelled by a
public agency to alienate all or part of the land s/he owns or possesses, to
the ownership and possession of that agency, for public purposes in return
for fair compensation.
Severely affected Households affected by the project and (a) The affected land is 20% of
total land or more than that and 10% for vulnerable group, and/or (b) have
to resettle.
Vulnerable groups Special target groups that are likely affected by inadequate impacts or at
risk of further impoverished by effects of resettlement, specifically they
include: (i) households headed by female with dependents, (ii) households
with persons with disabilities, (iii) households living below the poverty
line, (iv) households, children and elderly people without land and other
methods of support, (v) minority groups.
Replacement Cost Replacement of loss assets with assets that have similar value (i.e. lands
with similar production potential and location advantages) or cash
compensation that includes: (i) fair market value; (ii) transaction costs, (iii)
interest accrued, (iv) transitional and restoration costs, and (v) other
applicable payments. In case of structures, replacement cost refers to
current cost of materials (no depreciation) and labour cost. When national
laws do not meet the standard of compensation at full replacement cost,
compensation under national law is supplemented by additional measures
necessary to meet the replacement cost standards.
8
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Socialist Republic of Viet Nam is preparing Viet Nam Road Asset Program (VRAMP)
proposed to a credit of the World Bank. The proposed Project Development Objective (PDO) is to
cultivate sustainable road asset management practices by developing a national road asset
management system, to build the capacity of Vietnam's road agencies to manage road assets, and to
demonstrate sustainable maintenance practices on selected road sections. The proposed project has 4
components: (i) Road Asset Management System Development; (ii) Road Asset Preservation; (iii)
Road Asset Improvement; and (iv) Institutional Strengthening Program. Under component C – Road
Asset Improvement, land acquisition is required to upgrade/widen road, bridges in national
highways No 39, 39-1, 38 and 38B.
This Resettlement Plan (RP) is prepared for a Section Trieu Duong – Hung Ha of National
Highway 39-1. This section mainly followed with the existing one and passing through the paddy
fields of Hung Nhan and Hung Ha towns and end at Km 64+000 in Minh Tan commune. A segment
from Km 47+900 to 51+000 (by pass in Hung Nhan town) would be newly developed. Efforts have
been made during the design process to minimize the social adverse impacts (e.g. land acquisition,
resettlement) to households, collective and public facilities. The team also conducted socioeconomic
survey in Quarter 1, 2013 with a sample of 30 % the project affected HH (including 20% samples of
the severely affected HH) and based on the ROW identified by the technical engineers and marked
on cadastral maps available at the affected communes. In addition, the resettlement consultant team
for the PMU3 also carried out in depth interview with many leaders and people of the affected
communes, districts on the socioeconomic conditions of commune, districts and to obtain further
detailed information to help for planning the livelihood development programs through resettlement
plan. Findings of the survey have been incorporated in the present version of Resettlement Plan.
This section (Trieu Duong – Hung Ha) of National Highway 39-1 will affect 582 HHs, of which:
There are 362 household are affected on residential land with a total area of 13,447 m2.
There are 8 households would be affected on garden land with a total area of 577m2.
There are 229 households would be affected on productive land with a total area of 20,258 m2.
There are 86 households would be affected with more than 10 % of the productive land.
There is 7 households would be fully affected on house and with total area of 322 m2.
There are 82 households would be fully affected on residential land but only 7 households
would be fully affected on house and with a house area of 322m2. Others are with no house
on residential land.
There would be 20 households partially affected on houses with a total area of 203 m2.
There are public works and Collective assets would be also affected including annual crop
land and irrigation land of communes, power substation, power poles etc.
9
This Resettlement Plan is prepared based on the project policy framework reflecting both
existing Vietnamese laws and OP 4.12 Involuntary Resettlement of the Work Bank. All Displaced
People (DPs) will be compensated for their losses at replacement cost and provided with other
assistance and rehabilitation measures to assist them to improve, or at least maintain, their pre-
project living standards and income earning capacity. The main roles of the RP implementation will
be by the PPCs of the Project Province, DONRE, DOF, DOC of the provinces, the district PCs, the
relevant departments of the districts and commune authorities. Some local NGO such as women
union, farmer association, father front etc. will also be involved in implementing the RP in each
project province.
According to World Bank guidelines and the Decrees of the GOV on land acquisition,
compensation, assistance and resettlement, DPs will be adequately informed and consulted to enable
their active participation in the planning and implementation of RP. From January to March-2013,
series of meetings were held with the Provincial Departments, the District People’s Committees,
Leaders and members of affected commune officials, district compensation and Site Clearance
committees, key district departments (environment and land management, agriculture, industry and
commerce, labour, invalids and social affairs), farmer’s associations, vocational training centres,
agricultural extension centres, local banks or credit/loan institutions etc. Members from the Viet
Nam Women’s Unions at the district level were also consulted specifically on economic restoration
programs for the affected women and with regard to their capacity in planning and implementing
economic restoration programs as well as gender issues related to the project development. Many
meetings were also held with the DPs before the resettlement team carries out for the SES and IOL
in each affected commune. Final draft of this RP will be disclosed at project sites, VDIC of the
World Bank office in Hanoi, InfoShop in Washington D.C.
The RP implementation will include both internal and external monitoring and evaluation. The
PMU3 and the local authorities at all levels are responsible for the internal monitoring and
supervision of the RP for the project through the District and Provincial Compensation Committees.
The findings of the internal supervision and monitoring will be recorded in a quarterly report to be
submitted to the Provincial and District PCs and MOT. An independent agency has been retained to
carry out external monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the RP. External monitoring
and evaluation involves verification of the internal supervision and monitoring quarterly reports and
20% sampling of relevant DPs every six (6) months.
The rapid Replacement Cost Survey for this RP was carried out in early 2013. These costs are
used for the purpose of preparing cost estimates for the RP. During RP implementation, the cost will
be updated on a regular basis through the conduct of replacement cost survey by a qualified and
legal appraiser and will be reviewed and approved by the PCs of the Project Provinces to ensure that
payments to DPs will be at replacement cost at the time of compensation. The total cost is estimated
with VND126.075.209.505 (equal to $6.003.58) including (i) compensation for the affected
properties (land and asset on land); (ii) Assistance as per the policy framework; (iii) implementation
cost; and (iv) contingency of 35 % from the total cost of above mentioned items.
10
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. The Vietnam Road Asset Management Project
The Socialist Republic of Viet Nam is preparing Viet Nam Road Asset Management Project
(VRAMP) proposed to a credit of the World Bank. The proposed Project Development Objective
(PDO) is to cultivate sustainable road asset management practices by developing a national road
asset management system, to build the capacity of Vietnam's road agencies to manage road assets,
and to demonstrate sustainable maintenance practices on selected road sections. The proposed
project has 4 components:
Component A: Road Asset Management System (RAMS) Development. This component
will finance the development of comprehensive Road Asset Management System (RAMS).
This activity will complement and augment previous and ongoing support activities in the
sector from the multiple development partners including the World Bank, the Asian
Development Bank, and the Japan International Cooperation Agency. Specifically, this
component will consist of four activities; (i) establishment of the road database framework;
(ii) initial data collection for the entire national highway network followed by a rolling
update of one-third of the network in each subsequent year of the project; (iii) development
of a Road Asset Management System compatible with the already established sub-systems;
and (iv) inception of short-, medium-, and long-term road asset management planning for
national road network maintenance and improvements.
Component B: Road Asset Preservation. This component will support a means of
enhancing an effective maintenance method through performance-based contracts (PBCs) in
addition to the traditional road asset preservation requirements. It will finance technical
assistance on establishing PBC legal framework, formulating standard bidding documents
with the past lessons, and a supervision manual (for both engineering and environmental
supervision); preservation of high priority sections in the DRVN road network through both
traditional input-based method (271 km) and PBC (273 km); a study to compare alternative
maintenance strategies, which lead to practical policy advice on the most effective, long-
term preservation strategy for Vietnam.
Component C: Road Asset Improvement. This component will finance road improvement
activities for high priority sections (55 km) in the DRVN road network. It will include civil
works, supervision activities, and land acquisition and resettlement (financed by the GoV).
Civil works will include widening of nine bridges over 25 m length which are currently
causing the bottlenecks within the network.
Component D: Institutional Strengthening Program. This component will support well
targeted activities to build the capacity of Vietnam’s road agencies to enable better planning,
budgeting, constructing, and monitoring of road assets. Specific component activities will
11
include: (i) renovation of the Directorate for Roads of Vietnam’s (DRVN) human resource
management involved in the planning, budgeting, management, and operation of the new
information management system; (ii) improvement in management, transparency, and
monitoring of the recently established Road Maintenance Fund (RMF) by institutionalizing
and strengthening its management; (iii) development of standard drawings for infrastructure
facilities to increase consistency and quality control of pre-fabricated parts, and to expedite
design and construction processes; as well as (iv) technical and financial audits of project
implementation.
Among above components, the component C- Road Asset Improvement would require land
acquisition for the project construction, other components would not require land acquisition.
This RP is prepared for a Section of Trieu Duong-Hung Ha of the National Highway 39-1 of
VRAMP. This RP is prepared based on the project policy framework reflecting both existing
Vietnamese laws and OP 4.12 Involuntary Resettlement of the Work Bank.
1.2. Description of section Trieu Duong – Hung Ha of the National Highway 39-1
This section mainly followed the existing one and passed through the paddy fields of Hung Nhan
and Hung Ha towns and end at Km 64+000 in Minh Tan commune. A segment from Km 47+900 to
51+000 (by-pass in Hung Nhan town) would be newly developed. A map of the project route is
shown as figure 1-2 below.
13
Figure 2: Map of the Project
The names of the communes, districts and provinces which the project would be developed as
described as in table 1 below.
Table 1: Names of project communes, districts
# Province/
District Commune
Distance in
Commune
Distance
(m) ROW Area (W=m) Note
I Hung Yen
I.1 Tien Lu 1. Thien Phien 42+628-43+300 672 18 Roads and
Bridge
II Thai Binh
II.1 Hung Ha 2. Tan Le 43+950-45+200 1,200 16.5 Roads and
Bridge
14
# Province/
District Commune
Distance in
Commune
Distance
(m) ROW Area (W=m) Note
3. Hung Nhan
town 45+200-48+000 2,800 18.0; 16.5 and 14.5
Roads and
intersections
4. Tan Hoa 48+000-48+300 300 16.5 Roads
5. Lien Hiep 48+300-53+000 4,700 16.5 Roads and
intersections
6. Phuc Khanh 53+000-54+700 1,700 16.5 Roads
7. Thai Phuong 54+700-55+600 900 16.5 Roads
8. Hung Ha town 55+600-58+600 3,000 16.5 and 18.0 Roads
9. Minh Khai 58+600-60+500 1,900 16.5 and 18.0 Roads
10. Hong Linh 60+500-62+800 2,300 16.5 and 18.0 Roads
II.2 Dong Hung 11. Minh Tan 62+800-64+000 1,200 16.5 Roads
The Decision 2087/QD-GTVT dated 04 July 2002 of Ministry of Transport, which approved for
the investment project of National Highway 39 from Km 42+655 to Km 74+450 and from Km
81+600 to Km 108+381 (Trieu Duong-Cang Diem Bridge section) Diem Dien Port includ the main
points as below:
Standard of type 3 in a plain area:
o The width of 12/7 m
o A width need for reinforcement is 2m x 2 m (as the same standard of the road surface)
o Earth strip along the road is 0.5 m each side.
o Upgrading for the Sections passing in the 6 towns to type 1 and remained the same standard
as existing one in 4 towns.
o Minimum radius is Rmin=250 m and a special case could be with Rcc=13 m.
o The drainage system would be designed with the capacity of H30-XB80 and with the same
width of the road surface.
o The safety notices will be applied with 22 TCVN 237-97 of the Ministry of Transport.
The Decision 344/QD-BGTVT dated 19 February 2009 of the Ministry of Transport, approved
for the investment project of the National Highway 39-1 (section Trieu Duong- Diem Dien in Thai
Binh Province) has the main points as below:
Standard of type 3 in a plain area (TCVN4054:2005). Some special cases could be exempted.
The width of 12/7 m (Bn/Bm)
A width need for reinforcement is 2m x 2 m (as the same standard of the road surface)
15
Earth strip along the road is 0.5 m each side. Section passing through the towns would be
with 18/14 (Bn/Bm). The drainage culverts are with a diameter of minimum 750 mm.
Upgrading for the Sections passing in the 6 towns to type 1 and remained the same standard
as existing one in 4 towns.
Minimum radius is Rmin=250 m and a special case could be with Rcc=13 m.
The Nai Bridge will be at Km 48+217 and with B=2.5M + 4.2 M + 2.5 M and H= 5.93 M.
Le Bridge will be at Km 50+120 with a length of 9.36 m and with single steel spans
The safety notices will be applied with 22 TCVN 237-01.
The PMU3PMU3 has submitted to the Ministry of Transport a letter 02/TTr-BQLDA 2 dated 03
January 2012 with the main proposals as below:
Applied with a standard TCVN 4054-2005 (Vtk=80 km/hr), referenced with a standard TCVN
4054-1998 in case required.
For normal case the width of the road base would be 12 m and the width of the surface is 11
m. A strip each side is 0.5 m. The section passing through towns would be with a base of
14.5 to 18 wide and surface of 12 to 14 m wide and a sidewalk of from 0 - 2 m each side.
Two new bridges are Le and Nai at Km 48+251.22 and at Km 48+600 respectively.
There are two intersection and the safety notices will be applied with 22 TCVN 237-01.
A starting point is at about Km 42+714.26 and ending point is at Km 64. Total length is 19.7 km.
The width of the road base through non-town area is 12.0 am and the width for the road
surface is 2x3.5 m =7.0 m. Reinforced for the road base with 2x2.0 m = 4.0 m and earth base
of 2 x 0.5 m= 1.0 m. The sidewalk of (1-2) x 2m = 2.0 to 4.0 m.
1.3. Efforts in minimizing land acquisition impacts.
The Feasibility Studies demonstrated that each sub-project will be economically, socially and
environmentally feasible. Any adverse environmental or social impacts identified at the Feasibility
Stage will be adequately managed within the scope of the Resettlement Plan and the Environmental
Management Plan (EMP).
Study on the route map and site survey was conducted to make sure that the project route will be
designed to minimize the social adverse impacts and especially minimize impacts resettlement to the
individual households and to the collectives and republic works.
A cross section in a non-residential area and residential area is modified to minimize for the land
acquisition and resettlement impacts and shown as in figure 3 and 4.
16
Figure 3: A typical cross section in non-residential area
12.00
Figure 4: A typical cross section in a residential area
14.50 - 18.00
2. LAND ACQUISITION IMPACTS
2.1. Methodology
The survey on the impact of land acquisition and other affected properties (IOL) were carried
out on where all land and non-land assets including businesses income-generating activities located
inside the acquired land. The severity of impact on the affected assets and the severity of impact on
the livelihood and productive capacity of households are also determined. Information on the
number of affected households (individuals and collectives and public assets); members of the
affected households, sources of livelihood, income level, and tenure status are gathered.
The census and IOL of affected persons and affected assets for RP were done based the
commune cadastral map analysis with the verification of commune authorities and DONRE of each
project province. Inventory of Losses (IOL) were done for all affected communes. The land and
assets identified are subject to verification during detailed measurement survey (DMS) by the
17
district compensation and site clearance Committees following the phase of detailed design and RP
implementation phases. Questionnaire combined for socioeconomic survey, IOL and consultation is
attached as Annex 1 to this report.
The project goes through 11 communes/towns of Hung Ha and Dong Hung districts of Thai
Binh Province and Tien Lu district of Hung Yen Province. Survey on land acquisition by the project
is based on the route which defined by the technical team, the selected route is marked on cadastral
maps which available at the affected districts and affected communes within the width of the
corridor which described as in a Chapter of the project description (Chapter 1). The IOL including
land and all kinds of assets on land such as building, substructures, crop and trees etc. and identified
the affected households (affected family and collective or public works). The IOL is surveyed by the
EPC Branch in Ha Noi for the PMU3 in Q1, 2013.
2.2. Summary of Project Affected Quantity
The results of IOL were obtained and analysed are shown as in Tables 2 as follows:
Table 2: Summary of Land Acquisition Impacts
Main impacts Unit Affected quantity
1. Affected households: households 582
In which:
+ Households whose residential lands are affected households 362
+ Households whose agricultural lands are affected households 229
2. Affected area 45,465
Of which:
+ residential land m2 13,447
+ agricultural land m2 20,258
+ other land m2 11,760
3. Number of affected persons Persons 2,328
4. Number of households to relocate, resettle households 7
5. Area of house affected m2 322
6. Number of households whose agricultural land is
seriously affected (20% or more and 10% for
vulnerable group).
households 86
7. Number of vulnerable households households 82
18
2.3. Impacts on lands
Summary of Land acquisition by Location, Category and Affected households present in table 3
below.
Table 3: Summary of Land acquisition by Location, Category and Affected households
District Commune Unit Urban
land Rural
land Annual
crop land Garden
land Aquaculture
land Public
land
Hung
Ha
Tan Le HH - 44 11 - - -
Area - 1,278 415 - - -
Hung Nhan
town
HH 39 29 56 3 - -
Area 1,420 1,247 6,109 70 - -
Lien Hiep HH - 94 96 - - -
Area - 4,390 11,764 - - -
Phuc Khanh HH - 47 - 3 4 -
Area - 1,099 - 148 192 -
Thai Phuong HH - - 12 - - -
Area - - 449 - - -
Hung Ha
town
HH - 22 - - - -
Area - 802 - - - -
Hong Linh HH - 28 1 1 - -
Area - 1,150 152 61 - -
Minh Khai HH - 54 42 - - -
Area - 709 601 - - -
Tan Hoa HH - 7 - 1 - -
Area - 1,353 - 298 - -
Total HH 39 325 218 8 4 -
Area 1,420 12,028 19,489 577 192 -
Table 4 below shows the results of survey on the residential plots with remaining areas less than
100 m2 in the rural area and less than 80 m2 in urban area.
Table 4: No. of HHs with Affected Residential Land (in rural area with remaining area plot
less than 100 m2 and in urban area with remaining area plot less than 80 m2)
District Commune
Number of Affected HHs in
rural area with remaining area
of plot less than 100 m2
Number of Affected HHs in
urban area with remaining
area of plot less than 80 m2
HH Total area
(m2)
Affected
area (m2)
HH Total
area (m2)
Affected
area (m2)
Hung
Ha
Tan Le 6 507 73
Hung Nhan town - - 15 1,279.3 360.3
Lien Hiep 9 750 209
19
District Commune
Number of Affected HHs in
rural area with remaining area
of plot less than 100 m2
Number of Affected HHs in
urban area with remaining
area of plot less than 80 m2
HH Total area
(m2)
Affected
area (m2)
HH Total
area (m2)
Affected
area (m2)
Phuc Khanh 3 113 25
Thai Phuong - -
Hung Ha town - - 2 144.2 15.0
Hong Linh 3 254 97
Minh Khai 7 469 34
Tan Hoa
Total 28 2,092 438 17 1,423.5 375.3
Table 5 shows that, out of 229 affected households, 143 households would be affected on less
than 20% of their total agricultural land holding, the remaining households (86 HHs) would be
acquired from or more than 20% of their agricultural land.
Table 5: Number of Affected household by Severity of Impact of Land Acquisition
District Commune
Productive land Residential land
<20% 20%–
30%
Above
30%–
50%
Above
50%–
70%
>70% Total Fully Partially Total
Hung
Ha
Tan Le 6 5 0 0 0 11 11 33 44
Hung Nhan
town 33 15 3 2 5 58 18 48 66
Lien Hiep 50 26 14 3 3 96 18 76 94
Phuc Khanh 2 3 1 0 1 7 10 37 47
Thai Phuong 11 1 0 0 0 12 0 0 0
Hung Ha
town 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 17 22
Hong Linh 2 0 0 0 0 2 6 22 28
Minh Khai 39 3 0 0 0 42 13 41 54
Tan Hoa 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 6 7
Grand total 143 53 18 6 9 229 82 280 362
Table 6 below shows that the rates of land areas to be acquired for all types of land are low
compared to the total areas which the households are holding.
20
Table 6: Average Land Holdings and Severity of Land Acquisition Impacts
Commune Index
Available
annual crop
land
Affected
annual
crop land
Available
garden
land
Affected
garden
land
Available
aquaculture
land
Affected
aquaculture
land
Residential
land
Affected
residential
land
Tan Le HH 11 11 - - - - 44 44
Average area 689.5 37.7 - - - - 263.3 29.0
Hung Nhan town HH 56 56 3 3 - - 66 66
Average area 1,065.0 109.1 215.3 23.3 - - 248.0 40.4
Lien Hiep HH 96 96 - - - - 94 94
Average area 1,113.7 122.5 - - - - 251.9 46.7
Phuc Khanh HH - - 3 3 4 4 47 47
Average area - - 218.7 49.3 134.3 48.0 247.9 23.4
Thai Phuong HH 12 12 - - - - - -
Average area 1,520.0 37.4 - - - - - -
Hung Ha town HH - - - - - - 22.0 22.0
Average area - - - - - - 212.5 36.5
Hong Linh HH 1 1 1 1 - - 28 28
Average area 1,800.0 152.0 1,500.0 61.1 - - 238.6 41.1
Minh Khai HH 42 42 - - - - 54 54
Average area 1,483.3 14.3 - - - - 189.6 13.1
Tan Hoa HH - - 1 1 - - 7 7
Average area - - 500.0 298.0 - - 452.3 193.2
Total HH 218 218 8 8 4 4 362 362
Average area 1,176.5 89.4 412.8 72.1 134.3 48.0 243.2 37.1
21
2.4. Impacts on building and sub-assets
There are 7 households who would be fully affected on house and with total affected area of
322.3 m2 and there are 20 households who would be partially affected on houses with a total
affected area of 202.8 m2. Therefore, most of the households would be compensated by cash for
their partly affected area of the houses.
Table 7: Summary of Impacts on Houses
District Commune Fully affected Partially affected
Total affected
houses
HH Area (m2) HH Area (m2) HH Area (m2)
Hung
Ha
Tan Le 1 21.3 1 12.5 2 33.8
Hung Nhan town 3 129.0 2 22.6 5 151.6
Lien Hiep 1 82.0 13 107.5 14 189.5
Phuc Khanh - - - - - -
Thai Phuong - - - - - -
Hung Ha town 1 35.0 - - 1 35.0
Hong Linh - - - - - -
Minh Khai - - 1 8.9 1 8.9
Tan Hoa 1 55.0 3 51.3 4 106.3
Grand total 7 322.3 20 202.8 27 525.1
Table 8 analysed the categories of potential affected houses based on the standards of Viet Nam
(Classes 1,2,3,4 and temporary houses). Table 9 describes the households who would fully affected
houses and residential land by location. Table 10 describes the households who would be affected
on shops (independent shops and shop in living houses). There are 27 households who have their
shops affected and they are in Hong Linh, Minh Khai and Tan Hoa communes.
Table 11 describes the substructures that would be affected by the project such as kitchen,
fence, yards etc.
Table 8: Affected Houses by Grade
District Commune
HH and
area
affected
Quantity
House by Grade
Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Wooden
house
Temporary
house
Hung
Ha
Tan Le HH 2 0 0 0 2 0 0
Area (m2) 33.8 0 0 0 33.8 0 0
Hung Nhan
town
HH 5 0 0 0 5 0 0
Area (m2) 151.6 0 0 0 151.6 0 0
Lien Hiep HH 14 0 3 1 11 0 0
Area (m2) 189.5 0 26.7 82 80.8 0 0
22
District Commune
HH and
area
affected
Quantity
House by Grade
Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Wooden
house
Temporary
house
Phuc Khanh HH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area (m2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Thai
Phuong
HH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area (m2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hung Ha
town
HH 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
Area (m2) 35 0 0 0 35 0 0
Hong Linh HH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area (m2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Minh Khai HH 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
Area (m2) 8.9 0 0 0 8.9 0 0
Tan Hoa HH 4 0 1 2 1 0 0
Area (m2) 106.3 0 55 34.3 17 0 0
Total HH 27 0 4 3 21 0 0
Area (m2) 525.05 0 81.7 116.3 327.05 0 0
Note: A household in Lien Hiep commune has two affected houses.
Table 9: Fully affected houses and residential land by location
Locality No. of
affected
houses
Area of
affected
house
(m2)
House on
residential land
House on non-
residential land Residential land
non-affected
house(HH) District Commune HH Area
(m2)
HH Area
(m2)
Hung Ha
Tan Le 2 33.8 2 33.8 - - 42
Hung Nhan
town 5 151.6 5 151.6 - - 61
Lien Hiep 14 189.5 14 189.5 - - 80
Phuc Khanh - - - - - - 47
Thai Phuong - - - - - - -
Hung Ha
town 1 35.0 1 35.0 - - 21
Hong Linh - - - - - - 28
Minh Khai 1 8.9 1 8.9 - - 53
Tan Hoa 4 106.3 4 106.3 - - 3
Total 27 525.1 27 525.1 - - 335
23
Table 10: Impacts on shops
District Commune
Total number of
HH affected
stores/shops
Number of
affected
stores/shops inside
house
Number of affected
stores/shops outside
house
Hung
Ha
Tan Le 6 5 1
Hung Nhan town 1 0 1
Lien Hiep 2 0 2
Phuc Khanh 0 0 0
Thai Phuong 0 0 0
Hung Ha town 5 5 0
Hong Linh 11 8 3
Minh Khai 1 1 0
Tan Hoa 1 1 0
Grand total 27 20 7
24
Table 11: Affected Secondary Structures
District Commune Unit
Affected
Kitchen
outside
house
(m2)
Affected
Breeding
facilities
(m2)
Affected
Power
meter
(piece)
Affected
Fence
(m2)
Affected
Gate
(m2)
Affected
Toilet
(m2)
Affected
Well
(Unit)
Affected
Water
tank
(m3)
Affected
Yard
(m3)
Affected
Fish
pond
(m3)
Hung Ha
Tan Le HH - - - - 4 - 1 - 40 -
Quantity - - - - 22 - 1 - 801 -
Hung Nhan
town
HH 3 - 1 1 6 - 3 - 26 1
Quantity 60 - 1 30 42 - 3 - 444 40
Lien Hiep HH 2 1 - 6 32 - 1 - 59 -
Quantity 30 30 - 145 137 - 1 - 1,509 -
Phuc Khanh HH 1 1 - 5 12 - - - 31 2
Quantity 10 20 - 149 109 - - - 449 200
Hung Ha
town
HH - - - - 7 - 1 - 18 -
Quantity - - - - 38 - 1 - 329 -
Hong Linh HH 1 - - - 5 - - 1 27 -
Quantity 20 - - - 32 - - 1 568 -
Minh Khai HH - - - - 5 - - - 49 -
Quantity - - - - 30 - - - 520 -
Tan Hoa HH 6 1 - 4 4 2 1 2 7 1
Quantity 103 10 - 300 31 15 1 20 275 298
Total HH 13 3 1 16 75 2 7 3 257 4
Quantity 223 60 1 624 441 15 7 21 4,895 538
25
2.5. Impacts on crops and trees
Tables 12 and 13 show the results of IOL on the trees and crops to be affected by the project.
Table 12: Impacts on Trees (No. of Trees)
Commune Unit
Lo
ng
an
Lit
chi
Ja
ck f
ruit
“D
oi”
Ma
ng
o
“N
a”
Gu
av
a
Ba
na
na
Gra
pef
ruit
“X
oa
n”
“B
an
g”
Ver
du
re
Oth
er T
imb
er
“S
i”
“L
oc
vu
ng”
MM
ilk
woo
d p
ine
Pea
ch
Oth
er t
rees
Tan Le HH 14 - 1 - 1 - 3 - 1 - 2 3 - 1 1 - - -
Quantity 36 - 1 - 2 - 5 - 5 - 3 21 - 1 3 - - -
Hung Nhan
town
HH 12 - - 1 2 - - 2 3 1 1 2 - 2 - - -
Quantity 21 - - 1 3 - - 30 5 1 1 6 - 6 - - -
Lien Hiep HH 32 6 3 1 6 1 3 3 3 4 6 4 1 - - 1 - 1
Quantity 62 12 5 1 8 3 7 21 4 4 9 6 1 - - 1 - 1
Phuc Khanh HH 15 3 1 - 4 - - 8 - 3 7 6 - 6 3 - 1 -
Quantity 21 4 1 - 4 - - 80 - 18 12 16 - 8 5 - 1 -
Hung Ha town HH 10 - - 1 1 1 - 2 1 - 1 - - - - - -
Quantity 19 - - 1 2 3 - 11 1 - 1 - - - - - -
Hong Linh HH 8 2 1 - 3 1 1 2 - - 3 2 - - - 1 - -
Quantity 10 2 1 - 3 2 1 2 - - 4 16 - - - 1 - -
Minh Khai HH 7 - - 1 2 1 - - 1 - 1 - - - - - - -
Quantity 12 - - 1 3 1 - - 1 - 1 - - - - - - -
Tan Hoa HH 1 2 - 3 1 1 2 - - - - - - - - - -
Quantity 2 2 - 3 1 1 22 - - - - - - - - - -
Total HH 99 11 8 4 22 5 8 19 9 8 21 17 1 9 4 2 1 1
Quantity 183 18 10 4 28 10 14 166 16 23 31 65 1 15 8 2 1 1
26
Table 13: Impacts on crops
Commune Unit Affected rice Affected corn
Tan Le HH 11 -
Quantity (m2) 413 -
Hung Nhan town HH 19 1
Quantity (m2) 1,714 228
Lien Hiep HH 50 -
Quantity (m2) 5,425 -
Phuc Khanh HH 12 -
Quantity (m2) 449 -
Thai Phuong HH 1 -
Quantity (m2) 100 -
Hung Ha town HH 40 -
Quantity (m2) 612 -
Total HH 133 1
Quantity (m2) 8,713 228
2.6. Impacts on public works
The public works affected are described in table 14 below.
Table 14: The public land and public works affected by the project
Commune Affected Assets Owner Unit Quantity
1. Thien Phien,
Tien Lu district,
Hung Yen
Specific Use Land
Commune PC
m2
365
2. Tan Le, Hung
Ha, Thai Binh
Specific Use Land Trieu Duong Post m2 13.4
Annual crop land Commune PC m2 23.7
Perennial crop land Commune PC m2 568.7
Irrigation canal land Commune PC m2 1,247.3
Electric pole Hung Ha Power Service Pole 26.0
Power wire Hung Ha Power Service m 80.0
3. Hung Nhan
town, Hung Ha,
Thai Binh
Residential land Commune PC m2 125.8
Annual crop land Commune PC m2 1,376.7
Electric pole Hung Ha Power Service Pole 30.0
Power wire Hung Ha Power Service m 120.0
5. Lien Hiep,
Hung Ha, Thai
Binh
Electric pole Hung Ha Power Service Pole 38.0
Power wire Hung Ha Power Service m 160.0
27
Commune Affected Assets Owner Unit Quantity
6. Phuc Khanh,
Hung Ha, Thai
Binh
Annual crop land Commune PC m2 261.4
Electric pole Hung Ha Power Service Pole 12.0
Power wire Hung Ha Power Service m 60.0
7. Thai Phuong,
Hung Ha, Thai
Binh
Annual crop land Commune PC m2 628.0
Electric pole Hung Ha Power Service Pole 30.0
Power wire Hung Ha Power Service m 60.0
8. Hung Ha town,
Hung Ha, Thai
Binh
Specific Use Land Hung Ha Passenger Bus Station m2 114.0
Other non-agricultural land Commune PC m2 95.3
Fish pond land Commune PC m2 616.5
Electric pole Hung Ha Power Service Pole 40.0
Power wire Hung Ha Power Service m 90.0
9. Minh Khai,
Hung Ha, Thai
Binh
Specific Use Land Commune PC m2 137.0
Annual crop land Commune PC m2 294.8
Perennial crop land Commune PC m2 2.3
Electric pole Hung Ha Power Service Pole 20.0
Power wire Hung Ha Power Service m 50.0
10. Hong Linh,
Hung Ha, Thai
Binh
Annual crop land Commune PC m2 3,535.5
Perennial crop land Commune PC m2 3.0
Electric pole Hung Ha Power Service Pole 40.0
Power wire Hung Ha Power Service m 80.0
11. Minh Tan,
Dong Hung, Thai
Binh
Annual crop land Commune PC m2 640.0
Perennial crop land Commune PC m2 525.0
Irrigation canal land Commune PC m2 122.0
2.7. Impacts on women headed households
Table 15 describes the severity of impact to the women headed households. 15 women headed
households have more than 10% of their productive land acquired and 18 others have all of their
residential land affected.
Table 16 shows the results of analysis on the average affected areas of land types of the women
headed households. The rates of affected areas are low compared to the total land areas they are
holdings.
28
Table 15: Land acquisition impacts to Households Headed by Women
District Commune
Productive land Residential land
<10% 10%–
30%
Above
30%–
50%
Above
50%–
70%
>70% Total Fully Partially Total
Hung
Ha
Tan Le 3 3 - - - 6 3 2 5
Hung Nhan
town 9 2 1 - 2 14 4 11 15
Lien Hiep 3 2 2 1 - 8 2 15 17
Phuc Khanh - 1 - - - 1 1 5 6
Thai Phuong - 1 - - - 1 - - -
Hung Ha
town - - - - - - 1 4 5
Hong Linh - - - - - - 1 4 5
Minh Khai 4 - - - - 4 6 13 19
Tan Hoa - - - - - - - 1 1
Grand total 19 9 3 1 2 34 18 55 73
29
Table 16: Average Land Holdings and Severity of Land Acquisition Impacts with Households Headed by Women
Commune Index
Available
annual crop
land
Affected
annual crop
land
Available
garden
land
Affected
garden
land
Available
aquaculture
land
Affected
aquaculture
land
Residential
land
Affected
residential
land
Tan Le HH 6 6 - - - - 5 5
Average area (m2) 454.3 23.4 - - - - 195.2 7.2
Hung Nhan
town
HH 14 14 - - - - 15 15
Average area (m2) 1,751.3 137.4 - - - - 255.3 39.6
Lien Hiep HH 8 8 - - - - 17 17
Average area (m2) 1,062.8 141.0 - - - - 236.3 63.2
Phuc Khanh HH - - - - 1 1 6 6
Average area (m2) - - - - 131.0 33.0 302.8 17.1
Thai
Phuong
HH 1 1 - - - - - -
Average area (m2) 360.0 42.0 - - - - - -
Hung Ha
town
HH - - - - - - 5 5
Average area (m2) - - - - - - 209.8 17.1
Hong Linh HH - - - - - - 5 5
Average area (m2) - - - - - - 179.6 35.5
Minh Khai HH 4 4 - - - - 19 19
Average area (m2) 755.0 14.8 - - - - 172.5 8.7
Tan Hoa HH - - - - - - 1 1
Average area (m2) - - - - - - 400.0 45.2
Total HH 33 33 - - 1 1 73 73
Average area (m2) 1,185.6 99.8 - - 131.0 33.0 222.8 31.2
30
3. SOCIOECONOMIC PROFILES
3.1. Overview of project socio-economic situation
Thai Binh province is in the Red River Delta of northern Vietnam. It is surrounded by
Hai Duong Province and Hai Phong City on the North, Ha Nam and Hung Yen provinces on
the West, East Sea on the East and Nam Dinh Province on the South.
The total area of Thai Binh province is about 1.570,06 km2, in which the inner city has
the area of 67,74 km2. The province has 07 districts including Quynh Phu, Hung Ha, Dong
Hung, Thai Thuy, Tien Hai, Kien Xuong and Vu Thu.
The total population of the province in 2011 is 1,786,300 people, in which the population
in the Thai Binh city is 184,520 people (accounting for 4,31%) and that in the districts is
1,502,320 (accounting for 95,68%).
The number of labor employed in the province in 2011 was 1,010,100 people. In
particular, the number of technical workers was 68,686; that of qualified employees who
graduated from high schools, colleges and universities was 104,040 people and the number of
others was 837,374 people. The labor structure is divided as follows:
1. Agriculture, forestry and fisheries: 600,000 employees accounted for 59.40%
2. Industry and construction : 252,100 workers accounted for 24.96%
3. Services : 109,024 employees accounted for 10.79%
4. Others : 48,976 employees accounted for 4.85%.
Some detailed information about Thai Binh Province is shown in table below
Table 17: Demographic Characteristics at Project Communes/Districts
No. City/District
Natural
area
(Km2)
No. of
communes/
wards
Average
population
(person)
Population
density
(person/km2)
In which
Male Female
1 Thai Binh city 67,74 19 184,520 2,725 88,570 95,950
2 Quynh Phu district 209,61 38 233,090 1,112 111,883 121,207
3 Hung Ha district 210,29 35 247,360 1,176 118,733 128,627
4 Dong Hung district 196,05 44 234,060 1,194 112,349 121,711
5 Thai Thuy district 265,84 48 247,670 932 118,882 128,788
6 Tien Hai district 226,04 35 208,600 923 100,128 108,472
7 Kien Xuong district 199,35 37 212,550 1,066 102,024 110,526
8 Vu Thu district 195,14 30 218,450 1,119 104,856 113,594
Whole province 0 286 1,786,300 1,138 857,425 928,875
(Source: The Statistical Yearbook of Thai Binh Province, 2011)
31
Health care: According to 2011 statistics data, Thai Binh has 334 health care
organizations including provincial-level, district-level hospitals and commune-level clinics at
every commune. Total number of staff in health care sector is 5,290 people, reaching the rate
of 2.9 health care staff/1000 persons. This rate is rather good compared with other provinces
in the North.
Table 18: Health establishments, beds and staffs by state management
Item Unit 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
1. Number of health establishments Unit 303 305 307 309 334
2. Number of beds Bed 3,595 3,535 3,893 4,388 4,615
3. Medical staff Person 3,262 3,629 3,752 3,882 5,290
4. Pharmaceutical staff Person 1,093 1,189 1,250 1,301 2,248
(Source: The Statistical Yearbook of Thai Binh Province, 2011)
Education: All communes have kindergartens and elementary schools. There are around
3-6 high schools in each district. And number of colleges and universities in the province is 9.
Elementary and Secondary education are provided to all children all over the province.
3.2. Socio-Economic Conditions of DPs
Data on socio-economic situation of the DPs by the project is collected from the survey
results through questionnaire interview for 202 households (HHs) in Hung Ha district (there
are no DPs in Tien Lu and Dong Hung districts) and focus interviews with nearly 65
representatives from households, district/communes and village staff (including both men and
women) and 18 public consultations and group discussions. The selection of HH sample for
socio-economic survey is based on the results of inventory losses (IOL) and severely DPs due
to the loss of agricultural land, loss of residential land and HHs doing businesses. The formal
and informal meetings and group discussions with local authorities and other stakeholders
were held during the implementation of socio-economic survey.
The number of surveyed households through questionnaire survey is listed in the
following table:
Table 19: Socio-economic survey scale
No. Project area - Hung Ha district Household number
1 Tan Le commune 16
2 Hung Nhan town 36
3 Lien Hiep commune 61
4 Phuc Khanh commune 17
5 Thai Phuong commune 7
32
No. Project area - Hung Ha district Household number
6 Hung Ha town 8
7 Hong Linh commune 9
8 Minh Khai commune 40
9 Tan Hoa commune 8
Total 202
3.2.1. The demographic characteristics of APs
According to the survey sample of 202 HHs living in the project area, there is no ethnic
minority people in the project area. Average number of people in a HH was 3.5 members and
51,9% men and 48,1% women.
3.2.2. Household size
Average number of people in a HH was 3.5 members in the project area. Among them,
the HHs with the family size of less than 3 persons account for the highest proportion of
43,56%; followed by the family size from 3 to 4 persons (accounting for 40,59%). There are
only 2 households from the survey sample with more than 6 persons (accounting for 0,99%).
The detail results are shown in the table below:
Table 20: Household size
District Commune < 3
members
3–4
members
5–6
members
> 6
members Total
Hung
Ha
Tan Le 8 7 1 - 16
Hung Nhan town 13 12 11 - 36
Lien Hiep 23 29 8 1 61
Phuc Khanh 6 3 7 1 17
Thai Phuong 6 1 - - 7
Hung Ha town 3 5 - - 8
Hong Linh 5 4 - - 9
Minh Khai 21 16 3 - 40
Tan Hoa 3 5 - - 8
Grand Total 88 82 30 2 202
(Source: Socio-economic survey results of Thai Binh province, 3/2013)
33
3.2.3. Gender distribution
With regard to the gender ratio, male rate of 51.9% and female rate of 48.1% are the
average of the district. The rates are different from commune to commune. In some
communes, the rate of male is lower, in others it is higher than the rate of female. The detailed
survey results are described in the table below.
Table 21: Gender distribution of HH Member in affected communes
District Commune No. of
SES HH
Male Female Total
Person % Person % Person %
Hung
Ha
Tan Le 16 28 53.8% 24 46.2% 52 100%
Hung Nhan town 36 67 48.6% 71 51.4% 138 100%
Lien Hiep 61 113 51.1% 108 48.9% 221 100%
Phuc Khanh 17 41 56.9% 31 43.1% 72 100%
Thai Phuong 7 11 57.9% 8 42.1% 19 100%
Hung Ha town 8 15 51.7% 14 48.3% 29 100%
Hong Linh 9 19 70.4% 8 29.6% 27 100%
Minh Khai 40 66 49.3% 68 50.7% 134 100%
Tan Hoa 8 13 50.0% 13 50.0% 26 100%
Grand total 202 373 51.9% 345 48.1% 718 100%
(Source: Socio-economic survey results of Thai Binh province, 3/2013)
3.2.4. Education
Most of household heads had higher education than primary school. Among them, the
people with secondary school qualification accounted for the highest proportion of 39,55%;
followed by intermediate level, college and university level (accounting for 18,52%) and high
school (accounting for 15,18%). The rate of DPs with secondary qualification occupied the
lowest rate (10,7%). There was no case of illiteracy.
Table 22: Education level of Household members
District Commune Illiter
ate
Prim
ary
Seconda
ry school
Not
finishe
d high
school
High
scho0
ol
Vocatio
nal
Univer
sity
and
above
Oth
er Total
Hung
Ha
Tan Le - 1 25 3 11 2 10 - 52
Hung Nhan
town - 23 49 25 16 2 17 6 138
Lien Hiep - 27 88 25 33 17 25 6 221
Phuc Khanh - 12 17 13 10 4 12 4 72
Thai Phuong - - 11 4 2 - 2 - 19
34
District Commune Illiter
ate
Prim
ary
Seconda
ry school
Not
finishe
d high
school
High
scho0
ol
Vocatio
nal
Univer
sity
and
above
Oth
er Total
Hung Ha
town - 3 7 - 13 1 5 - 29
Hong Linh - 1 9 7 5 3 2 - 27
Minh Khai - 8 66 14 16 9 18 3 134
Tan Hoa - 2 12 3 3 1 3 2 26
Grand total - 77 284 94 109 39 94 21 718
(Source: Socio-economic survey results of Thai Binh province, 3/2013)
3.2.5. Main income sources and income level of AHs
Income sources
DPs have income sources from various sectors such as agriculture, fisheries, trade,
employment... Income sources depend on the districts. In communes of Hung Nhan, Minh Khai
and Lien Hiep, household income source was mainly from agricultural activities which accounted
for the highest rate, while those in other districts households had income source mainly from labor
salaries. Detail is in the below table.
35
Table 23: Income sources, according to communes/districts (%)
Commune Unit Agricult
ure
Livest
ock Sale
Catering
service
Workers
in factory,
workshop
Staff in
Governmental
offices
Work for
private
companies
Work in
transport
field
House
work
Hired
worker Other Total
Tan Le HH 17 2 9 0 6 10 0 1 0 8 1 54
% 31.5 3.7 16.7 0.0 11.1 18.5 0.0 1.9 0.0 14.8 1.9 100
TT Hung Nhan HH 71 5 6 0 7 9 1 0 4 13 3 119
% 59.7 4.2 5.0 0.0 5.9 7.6 .8 0.0 3.4 10.9 2.5 100.0
Lien Hiep HH 102 1 13 0 5 9 0 0 1 34 24 189
% 54.0 .5 6.9 0.0 2.6 4.8 0.0 0.0 .5 18.0 12.7 100.0
Phuc Khanh HH 27 2 3 0 1 6 1 0 2 8 3 53
% 50.9 3.8 5.7 0.0 1.9 11.3 1.9 0.0 3.8 15.1 5.7 100.0
Thai Phuong HH 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 12
% 58.3 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 100.0
TT Hung Ha HH 10 0 2 0 2 4 0 0 0 2 2 22
% 45.5 0.0 9.1 0.0 9.1 18.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 9.1 100.0
Hong Linh HH 19 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 1 30
% 63.3 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 3.3 100.0
Minh Khai HH 48 1 3 0 4 7 0 0 1 22 9 95
% 50.5 1.1 3.2 0.0 4.2 7.4 0.0 0.0 1.1 23.2 9.5 100.0
Tan Hoa HH 4 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 8
% 50.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 12.5 12.5 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 100.0
Total HH 305 11 43 0 25 48 3 1 8 95 43 582
% 52.4 1.9 7.4 0.0 4.3 8.2 .5 .2 1.4 16.3 7.4 100.0
(Source: Socio-economic survey results of Thai Binh province, 3/2013)
36
Survey results also showed that, except for households in which both spouses were
working in state agencies, most households have at least two or more different sources of
income. For agricultural HHs, the majority of additional income sources could be from
employment or state agencies; other households had revenues from small businesses,
combined with employment and other payment sources. Many HHs had about 03-04 income
sources. Through group discussion and public consultation, it was confirmed that household’s
income sources have experienced a transformation from agricultural into non-agricultural
sources. Number of laborers now working in the agricultural sector has also decreased, and
these laborers are mainly in the age range from 45 to 55. The laborers with age under 45
mainly work in non-agricultural sector.
Income level
According to survey results, the income levels of DPs mainly belonged to the group of 3-
5 million VND / household / month (50 %). Households with incomes more than 60
million/household/year accounted for proportion of 27.3%. Next was the number of
households with income level of about 12-30 million/year (up to 21,78%) equivalent to
average income ranging from 1 million VND to 3 million VND/person/month. Households
with incomes below 12 million/household/year accounted for lowest proportion (0.92%).
In the survey area, there is not great difference of income level between agricultural and
non-agricultural HHs living in different communes. This is due to the transformation into
non-agricultural income sources which has mainly taken place in Thai Binh province.
Agricultural households do not depend on only a single source of income but they have
income from various activities. Among them, agriculture is only one part of the income
structure of the whole family.
Table 24: HH income according to Project locations ( /month)
District Commune <VND 1
million
VND 1 million -
< VND 3 million
VND 3 million –
VND 5 million
> VND 5
million Total
Hung
Ha
Tan Le 0 3 9 4 16
Hung Nhan town 0 9 20 7 36
Lien Hiep 0 13 29 19 61
Phuc Khanh 1 0 9 7 17
Thai Phuong 0 4 3 0 7
Hung Ha town 0 1 3 4 8
Hong Linh 0 1 7 1 9
Minh Khai 1 11 16 12 40
Tan Hoa 0 2 5 1 8
Grand Total 2 44 101 55 202
(Source: Socio-economic survey results of Thai Binh province, 3/2013)
37
3.2.6. Expenditure
According to survey results, the expenditure of households focused on the range of 12 -
30 million VND / household / year, accounting for 78.2%. Next was the HH group which has
the spending rate of 30 - 60 million VND / household / year (accounting for 15%). Spending
level below 12 million VND / household / year accounted for lowest percentage (to 0.9%).
Spending level over 60 million VND / household / year accounted for 5.9 %. The majority of
households surveyed said that with their current income they were able to save money.
3.2.7. Living standards and Family facilities
Living standard: The poverty standard of Vietnam Government for Period 2011-2015
defines that HHs whose average income is equal or less than 400,000 VND/person/month are the
poor. According to the survey, the number of poor HHs in the project area is 2.9%1
Table 25: Classification of households by income
# Commune Classification of households by income
Poor Pro-poor None-Poor Total
1 Tan Le HH 0 0 54 54
% .0% .0% 100.0% 100.0%
2 TT Hung Nhan HH 2 0 117 119
% 1.7% .0% 98.3% 100.0%
3 Lien Hiep HH 5 0 184 189
% 2.6% .0% 97.4% 100.0%
4 Phuc Khanh HH 0 0 53 53
% .0% .0% 100.0% 100.0%
5 Thai Phuong HH 1 1 10 12
% 8.3% 8.3% 83.3% 100.0%
6 TT Hung Ha HH 0 0 22 22
% .0% .0% 100.0% 100.0%
7 Hong Linh HH 0 0 30 30
% .0% .0% 100.0% 100.0%
8 Minh Khai HH 7 0 88 95
% 7.4% .0% 92.6% 100.0%
9 Tan Hoa HH 2 0 6 8
% 25.0% .0% 75.0% 100.0%
Total HH 17 1 564 582
% 2.9% .2% 96.9% 100.0%
(Source: Socio-economic survey results of Thai Binh province, 3/2013)
1 The poverty standard in Decision No.09/2011/QD-TTg dated 30 January 2011 of the Prime Minister is applied
for Period 2011-2015 as follows: Rural areas: households whose average income is equal or less than 400,000
VND/person/month are the poor; households whose income ranges 401,000 - 520,000 VND / person / month are
the pro-poor). Urban areas: households whose average income is equal or less than 500,000 VND/person/month
are the poor; households whose income ranges 501,000 - 650,000 VND / person / month are the pro-poor).
38
Household Facilities: According the survey results, furniture, color TV, motorbikes, telephones,
refrigerators, air conditioners, and cars, are owned by families. Details are described in the
following table.
Table 26: Facilities of affected households
Facilities Rate (%) Facilities Rate (%)
Furniture 59.4 Refrigerator 73.2
Motorbike 99.9 Washing machine 71.8
Bicycle 85.7 Air Conditioner 51.4
Color TV 100 Car 1.8
(Source: Socio-economic survey results of Thai Binh province, 3/2013)
3.2.8. Housing and residential land
Most houses of the surveyed households are permanent (one or two stories), accounting
for 59.8%; followed by the percentage of semi-permanent houses (houses, tiles or concreted
roof -the level 4 house) accounting for 40.2%. There is no thatched household. The average
housing area of the households ranges from 80 - 100 m2/household accounting for the highest
proportion with 38.7%; followed by the proportion of houses with area of more than
100m2/household, accounting for 28.9%. The area less than 80 m
2 accounts for lowest
percentage of only 16.6%.
Table 27: House types of displaced people
No. Commune House type Total
Permanent Semi-permanent
1
Tan Le
10 6 16
65.0% 35.0% 100.0%
2
Hung Nhan
20 16 36
55.7% 44.3% 100.0%
3
Lien Hiep
40 21 61
65.6% 34.4% 100.0%
4
Phuc Khanh
11 6 17
64.0% 36.0% 100.0%
5
Thai Phuong
5 2 7
69.1% 30.9% 100.0%
6
Hung Ha
3 5 8
41.7% 58.3% 100.0%
7
Hong Linh
5 4 9
56.2% 43.8% 100.0%
8
Minh Khai
27 13 40
66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
9
Tan Hoa
5 3 8
64.6% 35.4% 100.0%
Total 202
(Source: Socio-economic survey results of Thai Binh province, 3/2013)
39
Occupants that self-constructed their houses account for 74.9%, followed by 25.1%
which have inherited it from their parents.
According to the field survey and public consultation with local governments, it was
confirmed that most of the houses are built on legal land, and their owners are holding land
use certificate. Temporary housing mainly belongs to poor households which might be
requiring relocation as per the province’s Master Plan.
3.2.9. Utilities and public services
Electricity use: According to the survey, 100% of the surveyed households use state
power grid with separate meters. Electricity consumption of an average household costs
around 100,000 VND / household / month.
Clean water: In the project area, there is no case of using water from ponds, rivers and
lakes for residential activities. There are three main water sources of the households which are
tap water, water from dug and drilled wells. Households in Hung Ha, Hong Linh and Minh
Khai mainly use water from dug wells and drilled wells. There are only 3 districts Hung
Nhan, Phuc Khanh and Tan Hoa where households can use tap water.
Table 28: Water Source for Using of Affected Households
District Commune Unit
Water Source for Using
Total Well
Tap
Water
Rain
water
Buying
from
other
Drilled
well
Hung
Ha
Tan Le HH 0 0 0 0 16 16
% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100%
Hung Nhan
town
HH 4 13 1 9 9 36
% 11.10% 36.10% 2.80% 25.00% 25.00% 100%
Lien Hiep HH 1 0 0 0 60 61
% 1.60% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 98.40% 100%
Phuc Khanh HH 6 2 0 0 9 17
% 35.30% 11.80% 0.00% 0.00% 52.90% 100%
Thai
Phuong
HH 1 0 1 0 5 7
% 14.30% 0.00% 14.30% 0.00% 71.40% 1
Hung Ha
town
HH 0 0 0 0 8 8
% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100%
Hong Linh HH 0 0 0 0 9 9
% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100%
Minh Khai HH 0 0 0 0 40 40
% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100%
Tan Hoa HH 4 2 0 0 2 8
% 50.00% 25.00% 0.00% 0.00% 25.00% 100%
Total HH 16 17 2 9 158 202
% 7.90% 8.40% 1.00% 4.50% 78.20% 100%
(Source: Socio-economic survey results of Thai Binh province, 3/2013)
40
Toilet: 100% of households have sanitary toilets. Most of households’ toilets have septic
tanks, accounting for as much as 80% of households. Households using two - compartment
toilets account for 20%. There is no case of household using public toilets or lacking toilets
Solid waste collection: Currently 100% of communes in the project area have solid waste
collection system.
3.2.10. Healthcare and Education conditions
Healthcare: In the project area, there are no households undertaking medical examination
every year. Most families are usually treated at district hospitals (79.8%) and others self-
medicate themselves (11.4%). In addition, other health services such as district health centers,
clinics and medical stations at communes are also popular among local people. According to
public health registries, local healthcare and family planning in the project’s communes have
been implemented comprehensively.
Education: Each district or commune have preschools, a primary school and a secondary
school. All communes have primary and secondary education levels...
4. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ENTITLEMENT POLICY
4.1. Legal Framework
Compensation, assistance and resettlement policy proposed for the VRAMP is based on
Laws, Decrees, Guideline Circulars and Decision of compensation and resettlement of the
Vietnam Government and involuntary resettlement policy of the World Bank.
4.1.1. The World Bank’s policy on Involuntary Resettlement
If involuntary resettlement under projects are not minimized, it often causes impacts on
economy, society and environment such as destroying production system, damages on
material and immaterial assets (i.e.: building, land, forest resource, cultural destinations,
economic assets and cultural and social activities). Such impacts may be permanent or
temporary. Therefore, the WB’s policy OP 4.12 includes safeguard measures to resolve and
minimize these risks.
The overall objectives of the Bank's policy on involuntary resettlement are the following:
(a) Involuntary resettlement should be avoided where feasible, or minimized, exploring
all viable alternative project designs.
(b) Where it is not feasible to avoid resettlement, resettlement activities should be
conceived and executed as sustainable development programs, providing sufficient
investment resources to enable the persons displaced by the project to share in project
benefits. Displaced persons should be meaningfully consulted and should have opportunities
to participate in planning and implementing resettlement programs.
(c) Displaced persons should be assisted in their efforts to improve their livelihoods and
standards of living or at least to restore them, in real terms, to pre-displacement levels or to
levels prevailing prior to the beginning of project implementation, whichever is higher.
41
4.1.2. Laws, Decrees, Circulars and Decision of compensation and resettlement of the
Vietnam Government
Laws, juridical documents of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and Decisions of Project
provinces People’s Committee applied are as follows:
- Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam dated April 15, 1992;
- Land law dated November 26, 2003;
- Decree No.181/2004/ND-CP of the Vietnam Government dated October 29, 2004, guiding
the implementation Land Law;
- Decree No.188/2004/ND-CP of the Vietnam Government dated November 16, 2004, on
methods of determining land prices and land price framework;
- Decree No. 197/2004/ND-CP of the Vietnam Government dated December 03, 2004 on
compensation, assistance and resettlement when the State acquires land;
- Decree No. 198/2004/ND-CP of the Vietnam Government dated December 03, 2004 on
collection of land use fee;
- Decree No. 38/2013/ND-CP dated April 23, 2013 of the Government, on management and
use of official development assistance (ODA) and concessional loans of donors, replacing
Decree No.131/2006/ND-CP dated November 09, 2006;
- Decree No. 84/2007/ND-CP of the Vietnam Government dated May 25, 2007on
additional regulations on granting land-use rights certificates; land acquisition;
implementing land-use rights; settling land claims; and orders and procedures for
compensation and resettlement when the State acquires land;
- Decree No. 123/2007/ND-CP of the Vietnam Government dated July 27, 2007 on
amendment and supplement of a number of articles in Decree No. 188/2004 on Nov 16,
2004 on determination methods of land prices and land price frame;
- Decree No. 69/2009/ND-CP of the Vietnam Government dated August 13, 2009 on
additional regulations on land use planning, land prices, land acquisition, compensation,
assistance and resettlement;
- Circular No. 114/2004/TT-BTC of the Finance Ministry dated November 26, 2004 on
guidelines on Decree No. 188/2004/ND-CP of Nov 16, 2004 on identification methods of
land prices and land price frame;
- Circular No. 06/2007/TT - BTNMT issued on June 15, 2007 of the Ministry of Natural
Sources and Environment on the implementation guidelines of Decree No.84/2007NĐ-CP
issued on 25th May 2007 regarding additional regulations on granting land using
certificate, land acquisition, implementation of land using, procedures for compensation,
assistance and resettlement when the State acquires land and redress grievances about land
acquisition;
- Circular No.145/2007/TT-BTC dated December 6, 2007 guiding on the implementation of
42
Decree No.188/2004/ND-CP dated November 16, 2004 on methods of determining land
prices and land price frame;
- Circular No.14/2009/TT-BTNMT dated January 10, 2009 of the Ministry of Natural
Resource and Environment, regulating detailed regulations on compensation, assistance
and resettlement and procedures of land acquisition, land allocation and land lease;
- Decree No.11/2010/ND-CP dated 24 February 2010 of the Government on the
management and protection for the roads.
- The Prime Minister’s Document No.1665/TTg-CN, dated 17/10/2006 on the
implementation of the management of site clearance and demining to serve traffic
construction projects.
4.1.3. Policies of Thai Binh People's Committee:
- Decision 16/2009/QD-UBND dated 03 November 2009 on the compensation, assistance,
resettlement policies as land acquisition by GOV in Thai Binh province.
- Decision 07/2011/QD-UBND dated 07 July 2011 on the amendment factors use for
adjusting the compensation unit prices for buildings.
- Decision 15/2012/QD-UBND dated 28 August 2012 on the process, procedure for the
investment projects.
- Decision 3152/QD-UBND dated 29 December 2012 on the land tariff and regulations on
the price of land in Thai Binh province in 2013.
- Decision No.03/2013/QD-UBND dated 25/02/2013 by Thai Binh Provincial People’s
Committee on adjustment the factor of compensation unit prices of construction works
issued Decision No.01/2010/QD-UBND dated 25/01/2010 by Thai Binh Provincial
People's Committee with K = 1.74.
4.1.4. Gap Analysis and Gap-Filling Measures
The main gaps between the WB Resettlement Policy and Viet Nam’s legislation,
including proposed measures to address the differences, are outlined in Table below.
43
Table 29: Main gaps between compensation, assistance and resettlement policies of Government‟s and World Bank‟s and proposed
policies for project
Policy World Bank „s Policy
(OP 412)
GoV‟s Policy Proposed policy for the Project
Land/ Property
Policy objectives DP (Displaced People) should be
assisted to restore or improved their
living standards to the pre-project
levels.
Resettlement site and its infrastructure
should have equal or better development
conditions than the existing one.
Livelihood and income sources are
restored
Treatment of
informal or not
legal land users
Rehabilitation assistance to all
displaced persons to achieve the
policy objective.
Rehabilitation assistance at different levels
depending on the “illegal” status of land
users.
Rehabilitation assistance to all DPs,
regardless of their legal status.
Compensation for
illegal structures
Compensation at replacement cost
for all structures regardless of
legality status.
Provided to cover the new structure costs.
Depending on the “illegality status”
attributed, covering between 80% and
100% of the total costs.
Assistance at replacement cost for all
structures, and provided regardless of
legal status.
Compensation
Methods for
determining
compensation rates
Compensation for lost land and other
assets should be paid at full
replacement cost.
Compensation for lost assets is calculated at
price close to transferring the assets in the
market. Provincial governments are granted
to annually set up the price for different
categories of assets.
Independent appraiser identifies market
price as a reference for PPC to define
compensation price.
Compensation for
income loss
All income losses should be
compensated.
Income loss is assisted only for registered
business.
All income losses are to be compensated
and restored.
44
Policy World Bank „s Policy
(OP 412)
GoV‟s Policy Proposed policy for the Project
Compensation for
indirect impact
caused by land or
structures taking
It is good practice for the borrower to
undertake a social assessment and
implement measures to minimize and
mitigate adverse economic and social
impacts, particularly upon poor and
vulnerable groups.
It is not addressed. Social assessment undertaken and
measures taken to minimize and mitigate
adverse impacts, particularly upon poor
and vulnerable groups.
Livelihood
restoration and
assistance
Provision of livelihood restoration
and assistance to achieve the policy
objectives.
Livelihood restoration and assistance
measures are provided. Not a follow up for
full livelihood restoration after resettlement
completion.
Provision of livelihood restoration and
assistance to achieve the policy objectives.
Consultation and
disclosure
Participation in planning and
implementation specially confirming
the eligibility criteria for
compensation and assistance and
access to Grievances Mechanisms.
Is limited mostly to information sharing and
disclosure.
Participation designed and implemented to
achieve policy objectives
Grievance and
redress mechanisms
Grievance and redress mechanisms
should be independent
The same body makes decisions on
compensation, resettlement and initial
handling of grievances
Independent grievance and redress
mechanisms to be established
Monitoring &
Evaluation
Internal and External independent
monitoring are required.
There is no explicit requirement on
monitoring, including both internal and
independent (external) monitoring.
Both internal and external monitoring are
defined.
45
4.2. Entitlement policy
4.2.1. Principles for Compensation and Resettlement
All DPs who have assets within or reside within the area of project land-take before the cut-off
date are entitled to compensation or assistance for their losses. Those who have lost their income
and/or subsistence will be eligible for livelihood rehabilitation assistance, based on the criteria of
eligibility defined by the Project and in consultation with the DPs. If, by the end of the project,
livelihoods have been shown not to be restored to pre-project levels, additional measures should be
considered.
The compensation rates will be determined based on the results of independent land/assets
appraisal in a timely and consultative fashion. All fees and taxes on land and/or house
transfers will be waived or otherwise included in a compensation package for land and
structures/houses or businesses. The local authorities will ensure that DPs choosing
relocation on their own obtain, without additional cost, the necessary property titles and
official certificates commensurate with similar packages provided to those who choose to
move to the project resettlement sites.
Land will be compensated “land for land” or in cash according to the DP’s choice whenever
possible. The choice of land for land must be offered to those losing 20% or more of their
productive land. If land is not available, the borrower must assure itself that this is indeed the
case. Those losing 20% or more of their land will have to be assisted to restore their
livelihood. The same principles apply for the poor and vulnerable people losing 10% or more
of their productive landholding.
DPs that prefer “land for land” will be provided with land plots with the equivalent
productive capacity for lost lands if available or a combination of land (a standard land plot)
in a new relocation area nearby for residential land, and cash adjustment for the difference
between their lost land and the land plots provided.
DPs that prefer “cash for land” will be compensated in cash at the full replacement cost.
These DPs will be assisted in rehabilitating their livelihoods and making their own
arrangements for relocation.
Compensation for all residential, commercial, or other structures will be offered at the
replacement cost, without any depreciation of the structure and without deduction for
salvageable materials. Structures shall be evaluated individually.
The DPs will be provided full assistance (including a transportation allowance) for
transportation of personal belongings and assets, in addition to the compensation at
replacement cost of their houses, lands, and other properties.
Compensation and rehabilitation assistance must be provided to each DP at least 30 days
prior to the taking of the assets for those who are not to be relocated and 60 days for those
46
who will have to be relocated. Exceptions should be made in the case of vulnerable groups
who may need more time.
If, by the end of the project, livelihoods have been shown not to be restored to pre-project
levels, additional measures should be considered.
Additional efforts, such as economic rehabilitation assistance, training and other forms of
assistance, should be provided to DPs losing income sources, especially to vulnerable groups
in order to enhance their future prospects toward livelihood restoration and improvement.
The previous level of community services and resources, encountered prior to displacement,
will be maintained or improved for resettlement areas.
4.2.2. Eligibility to compensation, assistance and resettlement
Those, who are affected by the project, will be eligible for compensation as follows:
(a) Those who have legal rights to land or other assets;
(b) Those who currently have no legal rights to land or other assets but have submitted
declarations for legalization of land-use right certificates according to the State regulations,
which are based on archives and documents such as invoices for land-tax payment,
certificates of residence status, or permission for residence and permission for use of the
land affected by the Project the local governments granted for them;
(c) Those who have no legal rights but are in the declarations for legal land-use certificates for
the land they are living on.
Persons who are subject to (a) and (b) are compensated for their land and other affected assets at
replacement costs and provided with other assistances. Persons who are subject to (c) are provided
with resettlement assistances in lieu of compensation for the land they occupy, and other assistance,
as necessary, to achieve the objectives set out in this policy, if they occupy the project area prior to a
cut-off date. Persons who encroach on the area after the cut-off date determined in each RP are not
entitled to compensation or any other form of resettlement assistance (though they may be entitled to
some support).
The cut-off date proposed for this RP is the date of completing for the IOL: 31 March-2013.
4.2.3. Entitlement Policy
Those who are affected by the project will be entitled to the compensation, assistance and
resettlement policies in compliance with the regulations of Vietnam and WB's OP4.12. Project
affected persons will not be considered to receive the compensation or assistance when entering the
project area after the publication of the cut-off date of the project.
The poor/ vulnerable households who are certified by local authorities will be considered for
additional assistances on case-by-case basis as special cases
The Entitlement matrix for the affected persons under VRAMP is shown in the Table below.
47
Table 30: Entitlement Matrix
Type of Impact/Loss Eligibility/ application Entitlement
1. LOSS OF
AGRICULTURAL
LAND (229 HHs)
1.1 Owners of land
with (i) LURC or
(ii) in the process
of acquiring LURC
or (iii) are eligible
to obtain LURC
The affected land is
less than 20% of the
total land area or less
than 10% for
vulnerable group.
(i) Cash compensation for their acquired land at 100% replacement
cost.
(ii) Compensation for affected assets at 100% replacement cost.
(iii) Cash assistance per m2 as set out in PPC’s policies.
The affected land is
from 20% of total
land or from 10% for
vulnerable group.
(i) As priority, compensation "land for land" with equivalent
productive capacity at a location acceptable to the APs, or, if
requested by the DPs, or if "land for land" is not available, cash
compensation for the lost land at replacement cost.
(ii) Compensation for affected assets at 100% replacement cost.
(iii) Cash assistance per m2 as set out in PPC’s policies.
(iv) Receive income restoration assistance and other assistances.
1.2. Land user are not eligible to become
legalized
(i) Will not be compensated for land but will be compensated for
loss of assets on land such as structures, crops and trees at 100%
replacement cost.
(ii) If DP is mainly earning income from agriculture, local
authorities could consider allocating land for the DP based on
the conditions of locality.
1.3. Agricultural lands that are rented
between households or individuals.
Compensation for land will be paid to Land use owner but
compensation at 100% replacement cost of the assets will be paid to
the land-users.
48
Type of Impact/Loss Eligibility/ application Entitlement
2. LOSS OF
RESIDENTIAL
LAND
2.1. Owners of
land with (i) LURC
or (ii) in the
process of
acquiring LURC or
(iii) are eligible to
obtain LURC:
Fully affected
(Includes DPs whose
remaining area is not
enough for
reconstruct of their
houses).
(7 HHs)
(i) Relocation options are to be provided to DPs:
- Self-relocate: Beside of compensation for acquired land at
replacement cost, DPs are entitled to receive an allowance for
preparing and levelling ground floor at the new resettled place as
regulated in Decree 69/2009/ND-CP or
- Allocated land in the resettlement sites with full infrastructure.
(ii) Compensation for affected assets at 100% replacement cost.
(iii)Provision of allowances due to relocation of house, as regulated
in item 8 below.
Partially affected
DPs whose
remaining area is
enough to rebuild the
house (280 HHs)
(i) Cash compensation for their acquired land at 100% replacement
cost.
(ii) Compensation for affected assets at 100% replacement cost.
2.2. Land users are not eligible for
compensation (illegalization of land users).
(i) Compensation for affected assets at 100% replacement cost.
(ii) If the land-user is not eligible for compensation and has no other
place to reside, the user will be assisted to buy a plot or an
apartment in a tenement house or with cash equivalent.
3. IMPACT ON
STRUCTURES
Impact on Houses and
building:27 HHs, Impact on
other structures:257 HHs
Regardless of ownership/usage conditions.
Impact on Houses and building facilities
and Impact on other structures.
(i) DPs will be compensated for their affected structures by 100%
replacement cost without deduction of salvage material or
depreciation.
(ii) The compensation prices are calculated based on the actual
affected areas. Each structure should be evaluated individually.
4. GRAVES/TOMBS
Households whose graves/tombs are
affected by the Project.
DPs are fully compensated for the moving expenses, reburial and
other related costs.
49
Type of Impact/Loss Eligibility/ application Entitlement
5. AFFECTED
CROPS/TREES Persons having crops/trees damaged. Compensation is paid to DPs currently in cultivation at the market
price of crops/trees and/or at the replacement cost of damaged
crops/trees.
6. IMPACTS ON
INCOME AND
BUSINESS
(27 HHs)
Eligible owners of registered business (i) Compensation for loss of income for business registered will be
at 50% of income after tax of one year (equivalent 100% of
income after tax of six months) according to average income in
previous 03 years.
(ii) To provide a support equal to 70% of the basic salary for
permanent laborers for economic establishments, production and
households. The period to calculate support must not exceed 6
months.
(iii)To provide compensation for the loss of business structures,
production materials at full replacement costs of the structures,
excluding depreciation.
Eligible owners of non- registered
business
Compensation for loss of income for business registered will be at
50% of income after tax of six month (equivalent 100% of income
after tax of three months) according to average income in previous 03
years.
7. TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN THE
IMPLEMENTATION
PHASE
DPs having residential land temporarily
affected.
(i) To compensate for all affected assets attached to land at the
replacement cost
(ii) To restore the land to its original condition.
DPs having agricultural land temporarily
affected.
(i) To compensate for a crop of crops/ plants at the full market price.
(ii) To compensate for loss of income for the next crops during the
time land is temporarily affected
(iii) To restore the land to its original condition or improve land
quality to equal or better levels prior to the project implementation.
50
Type of Impact/Loss Eligibility/ application Entitlement
Business householders temporarily
affected.
(i) To compensate and support for lost income of collectives, private
or individual enterprises if they are directly affected during
construction stage.
(ii) To compensate for affected assets attached to land at the
replacement cost.
8. AFFECTED
PUBLIC ASSETS
Communes, wards, administrative units
having public housing, structures, schools,
bridges, factories, water sources, roads,
wastewater systems, and irrigation systems
damaged.
To restore or repair depending on each circumstance and the
community do not have to pay for the expenses.
For cultural structures, churches, communal dwelling houses,
pagodas, hermitages, shrines under the local governance that need to
be relocated, the City People’s Committee shall make decisions based
on proposals of the Resettlement and compensation Council and
opinions of local authority and community in areas where there are
affected structures.
9. ALLOWANCE
AND RESTORATION
SUPPORT
All relocating households (i) Assistance for moving/resettlement: Relocated HHs will receive
cash assistance for moving to the new place as per PPC’s
regulation.
(ii) Assistance for life stabilization: Relocated HHs will receive life
stabilization support in cash, equivalent to 30kg of rice per person
per month, at average market price at compensation time notified
by Financial Department.
Assistance for a period of 6 months for relocating to other places,
and 3 months for reorganizing on the remaining land or repairing
the remaining house.
(iii)Assistance for renting house will be provided as per Provincial
People’s Committee regulations.
(iv) Assistance for Self-Relocation: DPs are entitled to receive an
allowance for preparing and leveling ground floor at the new
resettled place as regulated in Decree 69/2009/ND-CP. The
amount will be provided as per Provincial People’s Committee
regulations.
51
Type of Impact/Loss Eligibility/ application Entitlement
Loss of
Income/Livelihood
due to loss of
productive land
All DPs All affected households are entitled to monetary support for job
retraining equivalent from 1.5 to 5 time of agricultural land price of
recovered agriculture land. The amount will be provided as per
Provincial People’s Committee regulations
DPs that lose 20%
or more productive
land holding (or
from 10% for
vulnerable group)
(i) DPs will be entitled to receive Life stabilization assistance as
follows:
a) Losing from 20% to 70% (or from 10% to 70% for vulnerable
group).
30 kg of rice per person per month for 6 months if not
relocating
30 kg of rice per person per month for 12 months if relocating
b) Losing more than 70%
30 kg of rice per person per month for 12 months if not
relocating
30 kg of rice per person per month for 24 months if relocating
(ii) Other rehabilitation measures will be provided such as assistance
with seeds or improved young animals, agricultural extension
training, services, plant protection or veterinary services, technical
assistance for business or non-farm production. The type of
rehabilitation measures will be identified during the
implementation of the RP in consultation with the DPs.
Affected vulnerable groups Vulnerable households will receive life stabilization of 30 kg of rice/
person / month for 24 months at the time of compensation.
Bonus for timely handover of land for all
DPs.
Households who hand-over their affected properties on time (partially
or totally affected land) will be provided with bonus allowance. The
amount will be in conformity with the locality's actual conditions.
52
5. RESETTLEMENT
PMU3 and relevant organization needs to consider possible options with timely meaningful
consultation of DPs on resettlement alternatives (including the new location area), in order to minimize
and/ or reduce adverse impacts.
According to the survey results, the total number of households to be relocated under the project
is 7. They expect to receive all compensation, assistance and allowance for self-relocation. However,
to make sure that the households would not be in a difficult situation of purchasing land and
constructing the new houses as well as moving arrangement to new places, the commune authorities
and RP implementing Agencies need to assist the households who have to move to new places in a
process of purchasing residential land, constructing new house, obtaining legal papers related to land
and building ownership. The households will be assisted with connection to living facilities such as
water supply, power supply, communication system etc.
The households must be fully compensated for land and non-land affected assets and paid and
with full assistance package and give them enough time to construct the new house. They will not be
required to demolish the houses before the completion of houses at new place.
PMU3 and independent monitoring agency need to monitor and describe in the periodical reports
about the resettlement status of the households who are fully affected on houses and the repairing
status of the partly affected houses of the households. It is also needed to monitor that the houses are
compensated at full replacement costs as principle in this RP.
6. INCOME RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION
6.1. Overview
The general purpose of this program is to restore the livelihoods of affected persons to same as or
higher rate than before the implementation of the Project, and ensure that affected people adapt to new
conditions.
For the Resettlement Plan (RP) implementation, the PMU3 will collaborate with local authorities
at all levels and social organizations to restore DPs’ incomes sources. The activities are mainly
vocational training, job introduction and Agricultural activities.
6.2. Analysis of demand
According to the survey results, there are 86 households, whose agricultural land is heavily
affected (over 20% of agricultural land and 10% for vulnerable); 27 households having business
affected, 7 relocated households and 82 vulnerable households have to be paid special attention during
the income restoration program implementation. Many affected households still practice agricultural
production. However, according to the survey, an estimate of 75% households are currently living in
agricultural occupations, in which 28% of their income come from other revenue sources such as
business, services and freelance and a few are government staff.
The DPs have been consulted through the questionnaires and community consultations, their
views and opinions to the life restoration after resettlement is shown as follows:
53
6.2.1. Expectations for livelihood stabilization:
When asked about the project impacts, approximately 75% households said the project will have
significant impacts on their lives. Namely, about 35.8% households would have no land for
production; about 30% said the project would disturb their family life; 12.9% said their family
economy will be relatively impacted.
People living in the project area expect the project’s assistance of Self-employment, vocational
orientation and Agricultural activities. Specifically, 12.5% wanted vocational training; 36.3% needed
Self-employment; 33.8% wanted assist on agricultural activities. The details of people’s expectations
are shown in the following table:
Table 31: Preferences of the households to the income restoration activities
District Commune Affected
households
HH
gave
answers
Agricultural
activities
Vocational
Training
Self-
employment
No answers
given
HH % HH % HH % HH %
Hung
Ha
Tan Le 54 5 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0%
Hung Nhan 119 25 4 16.0% 3 12.0% 17 68.0% 1 4.0%
Lien Hiep 189 46 19 41.3% 6 13.0% 10 21.7% 11 23.9%
Phuc Khanh 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Thai Phuong 12 1 0 0 0 0 1 100% 0 0
Hung Ha 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hong Linh 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Minh Khai 95 3 2 66.7% 0 0 0 0 1 33.3%
Tan Hoa 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 582 80 27 33.8% 10 12.5% 29 36.3% 14 17.5%
6.2.2. Potential Activities Raised by Households
As a result of consultation with the local authorities, various organizations and affected
households, the following farm-based and non-farm based activities/programs are listed for
consideration in the planning of a responsive income restoration program that will cater to the needs
and preparedness of each eligible household:
a. Piloting of selected production and income generating opportunities that are endorsed by the
province and district. Vocational training and non-farm based employment should be first
priority.
b. Intensive agricultural production for farmers who still have remaining productive land.
c. Skills training program for persons wishing to receive training on selected fields. The training
should be on (i) vocational courses; (ii) intensive farming; (iii) animal husbandry; (iv)
aquaculture; (v) managing small business.
54
d. For households who wish to venture into small businesses, the Project will explore possible
seminars on entrepreneurship (idea generation and visioning, basic sales, marketing and
finance management).
e. Table 31 shows the results that most of the households prefer self-employment (36.3%), very
few households prefer vocational training (12.5%). High portion of the households prefer to
continue farming activities (33.8%) and 17.5% still gives no answers to their preferences.
With these results, the income restoration implementation need to focus mainly on the
assistance to the programs of farming extension, monitoring the self-employment activities
and getting the option of the households who still gives no choice to income restoration at this
phase of consultation.
6.3. Implementation issue
The aforementioned possible income restoration activities are generic in nature, tentative and
initial and, therefore, cannot be used as basis for detailed planning. During the conduct of detailed
measurement survey (DMS), the consultants will help design and implement the income restoration
program and will spearhead the process of identifying the livelihood activities of each household by
evaluating the household’s specific needs against the household’s preferences, inclination and
preparedness, and by assessing the availability of external support needed by the household to pursue
its chosen livelihood activities. The consultants will investigate and evaluate possible employment,
credit facility and provider of training when conducting needs and opportunities assessment for each
participating eligible household. Any good models from other project with the similar conditions also
need to be studied to apply to the project.
The singular objective of the income restoration program is to help the severely affected and
vulnerable households rebuild their sources of livelihood and thus regain, if not improve, their pre-
project standards of living. In addition to the principles governing the project resettlement policy, the
income restoration program will abide by the following precepts: be responsive to the specific needs
and attuned to the level of preparedness of the household; be sustainable and geared towards self-
determination and empowerment rather than dependence; foster justice and fairness, camaraderie,
social consciousness; and, be gender sensitive and environmentally sound.
Moreover, depending on its needs, preferences, and available human and material resources within
the household and those that the project could provide, each participating eligible household may
engage in one main source of livelihood to be augmented by secondary livelihood activities, especially
when the main livelihood does not yield immediate returns, such as livestock and crop production.
Secondary livelihood activities will help provide for the daily sustenance of the household in the
interim. A key ingredient of the program is to ensure that each DP household has the means for daily
sustenance.
Information pamphlets for each program will be prepared by the consultant of PMU3 and will be
made available to households and in commune offices. Information will include but not limited to the
following:
55
Production (farm and non-farm based)/Income-generating activities: type of program,
investment costs and net returns, time-frame for income stream to develop, sustainability, and
risks.
Project-related opportunities: type of workers needed, duration of contract, minimum salary
and benefits, schedule, basic requirements/qualifications of workers, contact persons.
Employment opportunities: name and address of organization, nature of organization, number
of required workers, basic requirements/ qualifications of workers; trainings to be provided;
minimum salary and benefits, contact persons,
Skills Trainings: type of trainings, objectives, duration, cost to trainee, qualification of trainee,
type of certification to be issued upon completion of training; links to jobs.
Access to credit: type of loans; requirements to avail loan, term of payments and interest rates,
risks involved.
The consultants of PMU3 for income restoration implementation will be composed of various
experts to design, implement and administer various programs. The process of planning appropriate
income restoration activities of eligible households begins about the same time as that of the DMS.
Data gathering and in-depth investigation of needs and opportunities will be done in parallel with the
DMS. The various income restoration activities planned and agreed with the participating households
will be included in the updated RP including the analysis of risk, marketing for the planed programs
etc. The implementation of the program will be monitored regularly to ensure that targets are achieved
and will be included in the resettlement progress report that will be submitted to WB. An evaluation
of the income restoration program will be conducted to sum up what has been achieved, to identify
additional interventions, as needed; and to draw out lessons and insights.
6.4. Implementation plan
The steps proposed for the implementation phase of income restoration as table below:
Table 32: Steps proposed for the implementation phase of income restoration
# Activity Time schedule Responsible Agency
1. Prepare the list of severely affected
DP (Losing from 20% of productive
land or 10% for vulnerable, affected
on shops, relocated HHs, vulnerable
groups): the list by communes.
As soon as the DMS
completed by the
DCRC.
Income restoration team
of PMU3 and DCRC.
2. Study about the feasible income
restoration in the localities, livelihood
plan etc. (with detailed information of
Parallels with DMS
activity and after step
1 completed.
Income restoration team
of PMU3 and DCRC.
56
# Activity Time schedule Responsible Agency
each possible activity). Consul with
commune, district, provincial relevant
agencies and the DPs for their
feedback to the feasible programs.
3. Based on the feedback of
stakeholders, prepare detailed plans
for activities (list of participants;
organization of implementation;
schedule; budget; monitoring and
evaluation and reporting. Some pilots
programs should be implemented first
to draw the lesions learned for the
subsequent programs.).
After step 2
completed
Income restoration team
of PMU3 and DCRC.
Need help of the
commune authorities and
Village Leaders.
4. Set up a Committee to implement and
this committee should include local
NGO (such as Women Union; Farmer
Association etc.); Commune and
District Representative;
Representatives of DPs etc. Training
need to be held for the Committee
prior to the implementation.
At the beginning of
the RP
implementation.
DPCs and CPCs.
5. Implementing the programs After step 3 Implementation
Committee for Income
and Livelihood
Restoration/Improvement.
6. Monitoring and evaluation, reporting Through
implementation phase
Implementation Committee
and External Monitoring
Agency for RP.
6.5. Implementation budget
The cost estimated for income and livelihood restoration/ improvement is calculated according to the
policy of the Government as in Chapter of Cost Estimate.
57
7. CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION, INFPORMATION DISCLOSURE
7.1. Objectives and Policies
The main objectives of consultation and participation are to:
a) Ensure that all DPs and related agencies to participate together in issuing decisions on
involuntary resettlement matters;
b) Minimize negative impacts caused by involuntary resettlement; and
c) Avoid possible conflicts during Project implementation.
DPs shall be fully informed and carefully consulted on resettlement and compensation plans.
Consulting DPs is the starting point for all activities related to resettlement. DPs may be afraid that
they will lose their livelihood and community, or that they are not well prepared for complicated
negotiations on their rights. Participation in creating the RAP and its management will help DPs
relieve their worries and give them the opportunity to participate in what will affect their lives;
implementing resettlement without consulting DPs is an improper and ineffective strategy. If DPs are
properly consulted, any objections to the Project can be timely addressed.
One of the important written documents towards strengthening democracy at the grassroots level
in Vietnam is Instruction No. 30-CT/TW issued by the Central Committee of the Vietnamese
Communist Party on the “Construction and implementation of a basic democratic regime,” and
Decree No. 79/2003/ND-CP on the same topic. The key basis of this legal document is the well-
known slogan: “people know, people discuss, people do, people check.”
Ordinance No. 34/2007/PL-UBTVQH11 (replacing and terminating the effectiveness of Decree
No. 79/2003/ND-CP) points out matters that need comments from local authorities and
communities before the relevant authority issues the decision including the preparation of
approach for compensation, assistance resettlement related to projects and works within the
communes.
Article 39, clause 2 of the 2003 Land law requires matters related to resettlement, such as reasons
and plans for land acquisition, relocation, general compensation and site clearance plans to be
published for DPs.
Even so, consultation and participation is an innovation in project implementation in Vietnam, and
both local residents and officers in charge of project implementation lack experience in this field. The
following points need to be focused on to encourage relevant agencies to participate in the Project's
consultation process:
a. Determining and encouraging all related agencies, and especially DPs, to join in consultation
and participation;
b. Establishing strategies for them to participate in project planning, implementation, monitoring
and evaluation;
58
c. Explaining strategies and details for disseminating necessary information and propaganda, and
establishing procedures to enable DPs to define their entitlements;
d. Attracting related agencies to participate in making decisions at the different steps of Project
implementation (e.g. modes of compensation, consulting DPs on compensation and
implementation schedules, etc);
e. Establishing procedures for redressing grievances.
7.2. Consultation and Participation Procedure
Responsible Organizations: DPs will be informed by PMU about the responsibilities of all
organizations and local governments concerned with resettlement, and the names and functions of
relevant government officers along with their telephone numbers, office addresses and working hours
(if any).
Implementation Schedule: DPs will be informed of the estimated schedule for major resettlement
activities, and that construction can only begin when resettlement activities are completed and DPs
have moved out of the Project area. It is necessary to emphasize that DPs should move timely when
once they receive all compensations for their affected assets. Compensation Councils/Committees at
all levels will be provided with maps and implementation schedules.
7.3. Method for Consultation and Participation
The methods of information dissemination and community consultation may include family
visits, site visits, community meetings, group meetings, focus group discussions, and socio-economic
surveys.
7.3.1. Consultation in the Preparation Phase
At the beginning of the preparation stage, local authorities and other government leaders at various
levels will be informed about the Project, its objectives and activities. They will be consulted and
actively participate in discussions about the demand for development and the priorities in their
hometowns. They can also contribute comments and ideas about possible adverse effects of the Project
and how to mitigate them and increase their community's interest in the Project. Local authorities will
also be consulted about their consensus and commitment to the RPF. The mass media, including
central and local television and the press, will broadcast the Project's objectives, components and
activities in public areas once they have been approved.
Community Meetings: Prior to the detailed design, the Project organizes in each affected commune or
ward to provide more information to DPs. DPs have opportunity to participate in open discussions on
resettlement policies and procedures. Notification or invitations to the DPs should be sent at least two
weeks prior to the meetings. The purpose of these meetings is to clarify information up to the date of
the meeting, create an opportunity for discussion. In addition to letters to individual households,
information should be disseminated through posters in public areas of communes, and rural/urban
districts where DPs are living, and/or via radio, newspapers, to inform DPs and the community. Men
59
and women in affected households and other people in the community are encouraged to participate in
meetings where the Project will be explained, the interests and entitlements of households will be
clarified, there will be the opportunity for people to speak their concerns. Such meetings will be held
periodically during the process of the Project. Textual and visual information will be provided for the
DPs in the meetings and copies of such information will be available in the Districts and concerned
communes in the Project area. The meetings should include:
- Textual and visual explanations, including printed information and tentative drawings of The
Project's for different items.
- Facilitating DPs in expressing their opinions, answering their questions, and encouraging them
to contribute their ideas to the recovery plans.
- DCRCs preparing a complete list of affected households that participate in the meetings.
- DCRCs preparing a comprehensive list of questions, comments, ideas and decisions that arise
during the meetings and consultations and reporting all the meetings to the PMU.
7.3.2. Consultation in the Project Implementation
During the Project's implementation, PMUs shall undertake the following with the support of the
Project consultants:
a) Providing information for DCRCs and communes through training seminars and providing
detailed information about the Project's policies and implementation procedure.
b) Organizing information dissemination and consultation with DPs during Project
implementation.
c) Comparing annual unit prices and the Project's tentative compensation unit prices; and
reaffirming the scale of land acquisition and impacts on assets based on the results of the DMS
and consultations with DPs
d) DPCs will publish Project land acquisition policies and invite affected persons to participate in
popularizing the Project and its legal basis.
e) Each affected person will in turn participate in the measuring and inventory of assets, and land,
and sign on the drawings of the acquired housing/land and inventory of lost assets.
f) Each affected person will be involved in reviewing the draft plan for compensation, the
calculation tables, and the amount of compensation for each affected person.
g) Each affected person has the right to reflect, raise their questions about the calculation of
compensation and have their questions answered satisfactorily according to their specific
situation, including issues related to resettlement such as prices, instalment payments and
procedures for documenting ownership in the new place.
h) Each affected person will participate in the review process for draft compensation plan, spread
sheet and estimate the compensation payment to each affected person.
60
i) The plan for compensating assets shall clearly state affected assets and the compensation to
which DPs are entitled, and this shall be signed by the DPs to show their agreement with the
evaluation results. Any questions DPs have on the contents of the plan shall be noted at this
time.
j) Sending DPs letters and/or questions related to the RP to inform them about the plans and
clearly explain the consequences of each plan, if any.
Affected and vulnerable DPs will be consulted about their desires regarding restoration assistance in
the RP. DCRCs will inform DPs about the plan and their entitlement to technical assistance before
requesting them to clearly present their desires for restoration assistance.
7.4. Information Disclosure
In addition to public announcements for DPs and their communities, the RPs, including Policy are
available in DPCs, CPCs, the Info Shop in Washington, D.C, and the WB's Vietnam Development
Information Centre (VDIC) in Hanoi.
7.5. Community Consultation Results
From January to March-2013, consultant conducted many meetings with relevant organizations.
Many meetings were also held with the DPs before the resettlement team carries out for the SES and
IOL in each affected commune.
The objectives of consultation in phase of preparing for the RP were to initially inform and discuss
with the authorities of the project provinces, districts and communes, affected districts and communes
about the project, objectives and principles on land acquisition, compensation, allowances and special
assistance to poor and vulnerable groups according to the policies of Viet Nam and WB safeguards
policy and requirements, preparation of resettlement plan, schedule for the socioeconomic survey, IOL
and information needs for preparing the RP. The meetings with the DPS and Representatives of
communes focused on the following issues:
General information on the project
Show at the meeting a project map and disclose the list of the project affected districts,
communes; scope of land acquisition and resettlement impacts
Objectives and principles of RP according to the requirements of GOV and the WB’s policy on
social safeguards.
Schedules of socioeconomic survey and IOL
Livelihood restoration
Compensation and relocation modes (options to cash or in kind compensation)
Gender issues in RP;
Mechanisms of participation, complaint, monitoring and evaluation through all phases of RP
preparation and implementation.
61
Plenary session and group discussion, Q&A
Copies of compensation and resettlement pamphlet for the first round of consultation were
distributed to all participants (Pamphlet is attached to this report as Annex 2).
The meetings, venue, time and persons met, participated and pictures of consultation are given as
in Annex 3.
8. COMPLAINT AND GRIEVANCES
Complaints and grievances related to any aspect of the Project will be handled through negotiation
aimed at achieving consensus. According to the Article 138 of land law 2003, Article 63 and Article
64 of this Decree and provisions on settlement of claims in Decree 136/2006/ND-CP and Decree
197/2004/ND-CP, complaints should pass through three stages before they are taken to a court of law
as a last resort. The DPs will be free from any fees for complaints.
The mechanism for complaint and grievance redress is as follows:
a. First Stage - At Commune People’s Committee (CPC)
An aggrieved DP may bring his/her complaint to any member of the CPC, in writing or
verbally. It is incumbent upon said member of CPC to notify the CPC about the complaint.
The CPC will meet personally with the aggrieved DP and will have 15 days following the
lodging of the complaint to resolve it. The CPC secretariat is responsible for documenting and
keeping file of all complaints awaiting at the CPC for settlement.
b. Second Stage - At District People’s Committee (DPC)
If after 15 days the aggrieved DP does not hear from the CPC, or if the CPC gives its
solutions, but DP is not satisfied with the decision taken on his/her complaint, the AP may
bring the case, either in writing or verbally, to any member of DPC or District Compensation
and Site Clearance Committee. The District Compensation and Site Clearance Committee in
turn will have 30 days to resolve the case. The District Compensation and Site Clearance
Committees responsible for documenting and keeping file of all complaints that it handles.
c. Third Stage - At the Provincial People’s Committee (PPC)
If after 30 days the aggrieved DP does not hear from the District Compensation and Site
Clearance Committee, or if the DP is not satisfied with the decision taken on his/her
complaint, the DP may bring the case, either in writing or verbally, to any member of the
Provincial PC. The Provincial PC has 45 days within which to resolve the complaint to the
satisfaction of all concerned. The PPC is also responsible for documenting and keeping file of
all complaints that it handles.
d. Final Stage - Court of Law
If after 45 days following the lodging of the complaint with the PPC, the aggrieved DP does
not hear from the PPC, or if he/she is not satisfied with the decision taken on his/her
62
complaint, the case may be brought to a court of law. The judgment of the Court is the final
results that the concerned parties have to comply with. .
The Project’s Technical Assistant Consultant will provide the necessary training to improve
grievance procedures and strategy for the PMU3 and district staff, if required.
The DCRC will develop and maintain a database of complaints received related to the Project
which will contain the following information: nature of the complaint, source & date of receiving
complaints, name and address of complaint, actions and current status.
DPs are entitled to claim about their rights of compensation, compensation unit price and policies,
land recovery, resettlement and other rights related to restructure support programs. DP’s claims
should be in written documents. DPs will present their own cases to competent agencies of the
people’s committees of districts and communes without any charges or fees.
The project’s grievance redress process will be disseminated through project brochures and project
information listed in the offices of the commune/district people’s committees. The complaint will be
resolved by the DCRC. The investors for the site clearance subprojects shall be responsible for
receiving, processing, tracking and managing these complaints.
9. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
The institutional arrangement for the preparation and implementation of RP is guided by Chapter
VI of the Decree 197/2004-ND-CP and Decree 84/2007-ND-CP and Document No.1665/TTg-CN
dated 17/10/2006. The responsibilities of key parties are described in Decree 197/2004; Decree
84/2007/ND-CP; Decree 69/2009 and in the decisions of the People’s Committees of the project
provinces.
9.1. Provincial People‟s Committee (PPC)
PPC will have the following responsibilities:
a. Carry out the direction, organization, advocacy and mobilization of all organizations and
individuals about the compensation, assistance, and resettlement and implement the site
clearance in accordance with the land acquisition decisions of competent state agencies.
Generate awareness on the project development to all relevant institutions and various
administrative levels within the Province.
b. Direct the district departments and people's committees to:
- Plan resettlement projects, resettlement areas to cater for the acquisition of land.
- Plan compensation, assistance and resettlement under the authority;
c. Approve or decentralize the District People's Committees to approve the compensation,
assistance and resettlement plans;
d. Approve land prices; issue the price table of property compensation, provide assistance levels
and support measures under the authority; provide resettlement plans, training plans for job
change under the authority;
63
e. Approve the unit prices which are detailed in the replacement cost survey report of the
qualified appraisers to facilitate the district compensation and site clearance committees to
complete compensation plans.
f. Instruct relevant agencies to implement the settlement of complaints of citizens on
compensation, assistance and resettlement under the authority prescribed by law;
g. Ensure the objectivity and fairness when considering and deciding the compensation, assistance
and resettlement when the State acquires land under the authority specified in this Decree;
h. Decide or decentralize for the district people's committees to take enforcement for the cases
which deliberately do not comply the land acquisition decisions of the State under the
authority;
i. Direct, inspect and handle violations in compensation, assistance and resettlement.
9.2. The Project Management Unit (PMU3)
The PMU3, through its Environment and Resettlement Team, will have the following key
responsibilities related to resettlement:
a. On behalf of the Employer, prepare RPF and RPs, monitor and supervise the implementation
of RPs of the project provinces.
b. Submit the Resettlement Policy Framework and RP prepared for the project to MOT approve
and waiving requirements if required under the authorization of the Prime Minister to meet
the requirements of the World Bank on involuntary resettlement.
c. Allocate adequate and timely capital for the preparation and implementation of RPs of the
provinces, ensure available funding for RP implementation when the project provinces
require.
d. Collaborate with the project provinces and compensation committees to organize training for
RP implementation and/or workshops on the compensation, assistance and resettlement for
the RP staff and other relevant staff of the project provinces.
e. Subscribe to urge the RP implementation of the District Compensation and Site Clearance
Committees to ensure full implementation of the contents of approved RPs. PMU3 requests
project provinces and DCRC to hand over the clean site for the project to ensure the project
progress and the order of priority.
f. Support the project provinces in the selection of an independent price valuation consultant
qualified and experienced enough to carry out the price appraisal.
g. Report the WB the situation and progress of the RP implementation quarterly. Select and
monitor the implementation of the Independent Resettlement Monitoring Consultant. Carry
out the internal monitoring and evaluating of the RP implementation of the project provinces.
h. Coordinate with the PPCs to timely resolve difficulties in the RP implementation of the
district compensation committees.
64
9.3. District People‟s Committee
a. Directing, organizing, disseminating propaganda and motivating all concerned organizations,
households and individuals to comply with the compensation, assistance, resettlement
policies, and implementing site clearance in accordance with the decision of competent State
agencies;
b. Leading the district compensation and resettlement committees of the same level to plan and
implement the compensation, assistance and resettlement; approving the compensation,
assistance and resettlement plans under the assignment of the PPCs.
c. Coordinating with departments, branches, organizations and the Employer to implement the
construction investment project and plan for construction of resettlement areas under the
assignment of the PPCs.
d. Settling citizens' complaints and grievances regarding compensation, assistance and
resettlement within their competence; making decisions to organize and force site clearance
and land acquisition involving unwilling cases within their power; coordinate with competent
agencies to organize the enforcement under the decision of the authorized agencies.
9.4. District Compensation assistant and resettlement Committees (DCRC)
A DCRC will be headed by a leader of the DPC and the members include the responsible staff of
the Finance Department, the Department of Industry and Trade, the Natural Resources and
Environment Department, the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development and the Employer.
In addition, representatives of the District Fatherland Fronts, Farmers’ Associations, Women’s
Unions, Commune People’s Committees and representatives of the DPs (including female DPs) will
also be invited to the DCRC.
The main responsibilities of the DCRC are as follows:
a. Assist the PPC and DPCs in the dissemination of information on the RP; provide guidance
and answers to land users on the compensation, assistance and resettlement;
b. The DCRC are responsible for the accuracy and reasonableness of the inventory data, the
legality of land and properties which are compensated and supported or are not compensated
and supported according to the resettlement plan; Assign the organizations to implementation
of the compensation, assistance and resettlement; Plan compensation, assistance and
resettlement; organize the implementation of compensation, assistance and resettlement
approved by the competent authorities; conduct consultations and participation activities,
income restoration programs and cooperate with the other stakeholders in the implementation
of the resettlement plan.
c. Carry out payment of compensation, assistance and allowance for DPs after the RP has been
agreed between PMU3 and the WB. Ensure the timely provision of payments for
compensation and support and other benefits for the affected people;
65
d. Organize resettlement for affected households under the project policy
e. Support the DPCs in resolving complaints at the district level.
f. Coordinate with other agencies in the design and implementation of income restoration
measures and relocation of households.
g. Report PMU3 the implementation of the compensation, assistance and resettlement and
complaints and complaints settlement of DPs monthly.
h. Other duties as prescribed by law by the PPCs and in accordance with the agreement with the
Donor.
9.5. Commune People's Committees
The CPC will assist the DCRC in the compensation, assistance and resettlement tasks.
Specifically, the CPC will be responsible for the following:
a. Organize the propaganda on the purpose of land acquisition, compensation, assistance and
resettlement policy of the project;
b. Perform the RP preparation and implementation daily;
c. Establish commune mission teams and assign the tasks for them; assign commune officials to
support the district compensation and site clearance committee in the implementation of the
DMS, preparation of land acquisition documents for the project, preparation and
implementation of resettlement activities;
d. Identify replacement land for affected households which are eligible and propose income
restoration programs in accordance with the conditions of the local people and;
e. Sign the DMS samples, certify legal papers or history of land use, land transfer for the
affected households to carry out the requirements for the preparation of the compensation plan
for them;
f. Settle of complaints and inquiries at the first level as required by law;
g. Actively participate in all land acquisition activities, payment of compensation, support and
resettlement and other related works.
h. Report to the district compensation and site clearance committee on the implementation of
compensation, assistance and resettlement as well as complaints and resolve complaints of
DPs monthly.
9.6. External Monitoring Agency
The independent monitoring can be conducted by a research institution, a university or a NGO,
which is specialized in social sciences. This unit will carry out the socioeconomic surveys,
monitoring and evaluating the implementation of the resettlement plan for the Project. The reports
on reviewing the progress, suitability of the resettlement plans and related proposals should be
prepared periodically.
66
WB
Provincial People‟s
Committee
Directorate for
Roads of Vietnam
(DRVN) –PMU3
Environment and
Resettlement Team
Departments and
District People‟s
Committees
District Compensation
assistant and resettlement
Committee
Commune People's
Committees
DPs, AHs
External
Monitoring
Agency
Coordinate, support
MOT
Direct, lead and feedback
67
10. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENT
The implementation process and task are as follows:
a. Preparation of land application procedure for the Project. After obtaining an agreement on
principles between the Government of Viet Nam and the WB on the Loan Agreement, PMU3
will prepare documents and carry out submission procedure to the project Province for
approval on granting land for the Project. This dossier would be needed for the relevant
Decisions related to the project.
b. Establishment of the DCRC. If any district that the DCRC is not yet established, the PPC
will establish DCRC for the Project, and entrust tasks to relevant agencies and entities.
c. Land clearance/boundary setting for the Project. PMU3 will cooperate with the PPCs and
Provincial Department of Natural Resources, Environment to determine the Project land
clearance red line and setting out boundary at the site in close coordination with detailed
design consultants.
d. Training for resettlement staff. After the DCRC have been formed, PMU3, with the help of
project consultants, will develop and implement a training program for implementation of the
RPs. The training will include at least an orientation on the RP, roles of agencies in RP
implementation, progress report preparation, complaint handling/recording/reporting, DP
participation/ consultation, gender-responsive resettlement and resettlement internal
monitoring/ reporting. Target participants to the training include representatives from the
CPCs, DCRC, and DPCs, and local Ngo etc…
e. Engagement of External Monitoring Agency. PMU3 will engage the services of an external
monitoring agency to carry out independent monitoring and evaluation of RP preparation and
implementation activities. Quarterly progress reports will be submitted by the EMA to
PMU3 and the WB.
f. Information campaign before DMS. Before land acquisition, within 90 days in case of
agricultural land and 180 days in case of non-agricultural land, the DCRC must send written
notices to affected land owners to inform the reasons for land acquisition, time and plan of
displacement, compensation/resettlement options, land clearance and resettlement.
o Before inventory and detailed measurement, PMU3 in cooperation with local authorities
of districts and wards will provide Project information to residents in the Project area.
Information will be broadcasted via the public address system of the locality in
combination with other multi-media such as radios, press, television, brochures or letters
delivered to households to be open posted in public areas.
68
o Consultation meetings will be held in the Project affected Communes to notify the
affected community about the scope and scale of the project, impacts, policies and rights
for all kinds of damages, implementation schedule, responsibilities for organization, and
complaint mechanism. Brochures including (images, photos or books) related to Project
implementation will be prepared and delivered to all affected communes in the meetings.
g. Conduct of Replacement Cost Survey by a Qualified Appraiser. If there is a significant
difference between compensation price enacted by the PPCs and market price as per
replacement cost survey carried out by a qualified appraiser, the PPCs will update the
compensation unit price according to regulations and implementation guidance of Decree
No.197/2004/CP, 17/2006/ND-CP.
h. Detailed Measurement Survey. DMS will be undertaken once detailed design is finalized.
These surveys will be the basis for the preparation of compensation plan.
i. Preparation of Compensation Plan. DCRCs are responsible for applying prices and
preparing compensation tables for each affected commune/hamlet. The People’s Committees
of districts will appraise these tables in respect of approved compensation prices, quantities
of affected assets, allowances and special assistance that the Project DPs are entitled to. The
unit rates are presented to the DPs and posted in the commune offices. All tables of
compensation price application for individual DP must be checked and signed by DP to
prove their consensus.
j. Preparation of Income Restoration Measures and Relocation Plan. DCRCs and the
organizations responsible for the planning and implementation of the income restoration or
livelihood program with the assistance of project consultants will carry out needs assessment
to design suitable income restoration measures and relocation plan for severely affected and
vulnerable households.
k. Issuance of Notice-to-Proceed (NTP) for Specific Sections. PMU3 will not issue a notice of
possession of site for any section (bidding package) until the head of DCRC has officially
confirmed in writing that (i) payment has been fully disbursed to the DPs and rehabilitation
measures are in place; (ii) already-compensated affected persons have cleared the area in a
timely manner; and (iii) the area is free from any encumbrances.
l. Monitoring and evaluation. Internal monitoring and external monitoring and evaluation will
be implemented from RP preparation to implementation. Grievances received will be
addressed through the grievance redress mechanism set up for the project.
The tasks and proposed implementation schedule respectively are described as in table below
69
Table 33: Implementation Schedule for the RP
Activity Schedule
1.RP preparation, review and approve by GOV and the WB From Q1 to Q3- 2013
2. Implementation mobilization (information disclose, institutional
arrangement, capacity building for implementation, recruit the
consultant for RCS and external monitoring and evaluation, prepare a
detailed schedule of implementing the RP by each project district,
including the budget need for each month of the years etc.).
Q4-2013
3. Marks demarcation for the land acquisition need on the ground and
declare the project areas to local authorities and local people as well as
to DPs.
Q1-2014
4. Approval of land acquisition for the project by the PPCs and decision
on land recovery from the DPCs to the DPs. Q1-2014
5. Carry out the DMS, RCS and prepare entitlement to DP
(compensation, assistance and resettlement plan for each HH), disclose
the plans at the communes as per request of the law; submit
compensation, assistance and resettlement plan for each HH to the
relevant Departments of the District and Province for their review and
then get either PPC’s or DPC’s approval which depends on the
arrangement of each Province. Disclose the approved plans at each
commune for the DP and commune authorities to check as per
requirement of the law.
Q2 to Q3-2014
6. Payment to the DPs Q3-2014
7. Plot allocation to the HHs who have to relocate, movement of the
HHs to new sites/ Q3 to Q4-2014
8. Design income restoration activities based on the consultation with
DPs and other stakeholders and implement the activities for the DP who
opt to the activities instead of cash payment for self-restoration.
Q2 to Q4-2014
9. Monitoring and evaluation of RP implementation Q1-2013 to Q1-2015
10. Settling for the complaints Through entire of RP
Implementation
11. Periodical reports on the implementation. Each Quarter
70
11. MONITORING AND EVALUATION
11.1. Internal Resettlement Monitoring
1. Internal Monitoring is the responsibility of PMU3 and DCRC with support from the project
consultants. Internal resettlement monitoring aims to:
a. Ensure that payment of compensation to affected people is provided based on the type of
losses and categories of impacts
b. Ensure that resettlement activities are conducted according to the compensation policies as
per agreed RP. Monitor the assistance from local authorities and communities in helping
the households whose houses are partially or fully affected, and who have to buy land to
move to or have to repair their partly affected houses.
c. Determine if the required transition, income restoration measures and relocation assistance
are provided on time.
d. Assess if income source recovery and recovery support have been provided and propose
remedial measures if objectives of restoring income of households have not been met.
e. Disseminate information and procedures openly
f. Determine if complaint procedures are followed and if there are pending issues that require
management attention.
g. Give priority to DPs' concerns and needs, specially the poor and vulnerable households
h. Ensure that the transition between relocation or site clearing and commencement of civil
works is smooth and that sites are not handed over for civil works until affected households
have been satisfactorily compensated, assisted and relocated.
2. PMU3, through its Environment and Resettlement Team, will submit quarterly monitoring
reports to the WB. Internal monitoring reports will include but not limited to the following
information:
a. Number of affected households and categories, status of compensation payment and
relocation of DPs.
b. Status of disbursement of compensation payment to DPs.
c. Status of income restoration planning and implementation issues
d. Results of complaint handling and any pending issues that require management attention
and action
e. Concerns and needs raised by severely affected households, vulnerable groups and how
these concerns are being addressed.
11.2. External Resettlement Monitoring
The main objective of external resettlement monitoring is to provide an independent periodic
review and assessment of (i) achievement of resettlement objectives; (ii) changes in living standards
71
and livelihoods; (iii) restoration of the economic and social base of the DPs; (iv) effectiveness and
sustainability of entitlements; and (v) the need for further mitigation measures as required.
The external resettlement monitoring address specific issues such as the following:
(i) Public consultation and awareness of resettlement policy and entitlements;
(ii) Documentation of impacts and payments (DMS forms, compensation documents,) as per
agreed RP;
(iii) Coordination of resettlement activities with construction schedule;
(iv) Land acquisition and transfer procedures;
(v) Construction/rebuilding of replacement houses and structures on residual land or to new
relocation sites; Monitor the assistance from local authorities and communities in
helping the households whose houses are partially or fully affected, who have to buy
land to move to or have to repair the partly affected houses;
(vi) Level of satisfaction of DPs with the provisions and implementation of the RPs;
(vii) Grievance redress mechanism (documentation, process, resolutions, complaint issues
etc.);
(viii) Effectiveness, impact and sustainability of entitlements and rehabilitation measures and
the need for further improvement, as required; Implementation of the livelihood
restoration activities and evaluation of the restoration or improvement level. Propose the
need for the improvement if there are households who are worse off.
(ix) Gender impacts and strategy;
(x) Capacity of DPs to restore/re-establish livelihoods and living standards. Special
attention provided or to be provided to severely affected and vulnerable households;
(xi) Resettlement impacts caused during construction activities;
(xii) Participation of DPs in RP planning, updating and implementation;
(xiii) Institutional capacity, internal monitoring and reporting.
(xiv) Information of government’s funds for payment of land, non-land assets and allowances
to the affected households (if being implemented) should be transparent, efficient and
effective.
Monitoring of RP implementation will be based on desk review and field visits, meetings with
various ministries and local officials, and affected households. Separate meetings will be held with
women and vulnerable households.
Between 6 to 12 months following completion of resettlement, the external resettlement
monitoring consulting services will conduct an evaluation study to determine whether or not the
objectives of resettlement have been achieved. The methodology for the evaluation study will be
72
based mainly on a comparison of the socio-economic status of severely affected households prior to
and following displacement. If the findings of the study would indicate that the objectives of the RP
have not been achieved, the EMA will propose appropriate additional measures to meet the RP
objectives. Activities will include the following:
Evaluate baseline data that was collected under the socio-economic survey to assess
changes in: household income and expenditures, expenditure composition patters, primary
and secondary occupations, borrowing amounts and debts patterns, materials conditions
and possessions of consumer items, land area and tenure arrangements, school attendance
of children, child malnutrition and general health, and distances to public services and
infrastructure.
Collect qualitative indicators on the DPs' own assessment of changes in living standards
before and after the project at households and community levels, which may be collected
through open-ended questions, semi-structured interviews, case-studies, or group
discussions employing a range of PRA tools and methods.
Verify with the APs that community services and resources damaged during construction
works have been fully restored to their previous conditions and operational capacity.
The external resettlement monitoring will be undertaken by an international consulting firm or a
national consulting firm composed of international and national experts. Monitoring will be carried
out on a semi-annual basis and semi-annual monitoring reports will be submitted to PMU3. The
quarterly reports will highlight the issues and problems arising and, if required, suggest time-bound
and specific mitigation measures. In terms of submission, reports will be submitted to PMU3 as
follows:
a. A brief inception report to be submitted within two weeks after completion of the inception activity.
b. Compliance monitoring reports and final monitoring report within two weeks after
completion of the monitoring activity.
c. Post- evaluation report will be submitted within two weeks after completion of the
monitoring activity.
12. COST AND BUDGET
12.1. Principles
The affected households will be compensated based on the principle of replacement cost plus
with resettlement assistance and assistance for the livelihood restoration/ improvement.
The replacement cost study is required and in order to make sure that the cost estimate for this
RP is bases the replacement costs. Before RPs implementation the updated and further detailed
study on the replacement costs will be done and then be reviewed/ approved by the project
73
provincial authorities before using to calculate for the compensation package for the affected
persons.
The compensation will be paid to the project DPs based on the following principles:
(i) Productive Land (agricultural, aquaculture, garden and forest) based on current market
prices that reflect recent land sales in the project area or, in the absence of such recent sales, based
on recent sales in adjacent or other locations with comparable attributes, or in the absence of such
sales, based on productive value;
(ii) Residential land based on current market prices that reflect recent land sales or, in the
absence of such recent land sales, based on prices of recent sales in other locations with comparable
attributes;
(iii) Houses and other fixed structures based on current market prices of materials and labor
without depreciation or deduction for salvaged building materials;
(iv) Annual crops equivalent to the prevailing market value of crops at the time of
compensation;
(v) Perennial crops, cash compensation equivalent to their current market value given the type,
age and productive value (future production) at the time of compensation.
(vi) Timber trees based on the type and breast height at current market prices.
12.2. Replacement Cost Survey
The Replacement Cost Survey for this RP was carried out by consultant in early 2013. These
costs are used for the purpose of preparing cost estimates for the RP.
To do the survey for the replacement cost, the survey teams carried out for the following works
including site visit to the project localities.
(i) Desk study the implications of the national legal orders to the compensation principles when
the Government. acquires land for the purposes of national, defence, public works and economic
developments such as Land law 2003; Decrees No. 197/2004/ND-CP; 123/2007/ND-CP; Decree
69/2009; amending Decree No.188/2004/ND-CP, dated 16 November 2004; Circulars 116 and
114/2004 of MOF on price determination method and price frame for different kinds of land as well
as the policies on compensation and resettlement assistance of the project provinces.
(ii) Meet with DOF, DONRE, DOC, MARD of the Project provinces. The teams interviewed
and obtained the comments from the above mentioned departments of the provinces and districts
about the current costs which are using to compensate for the DPs by land acquisition in their
localities.
(iii) Interviewed different local officials (DCRC and leaders of selected communes) as well as
local people on the current market rates of land in their districts and commune localities. For
communes that have no active market for non-residential land in the project communes, based on
74
other empirical facts, such as productive and location attributes, discuss and determine for the
replacement values for non-residential land.
(iv) Canvass of construction materials from the local suppliers, construction material shops in
the selected districts and communes, interviewed designers of local design and construction
companies, local contractors and local builders in the selected districts, communes to learn about the
current costs of materials, labor and cost of construction for buildings and other popular
substructures such as houses class 1, class 2, class 4, class 5 and temporary structures, fence, well,
yards etc.,
(v) Meet with vendors and agriculture specialists in the selected districts and communes,
including officials of the Department of Agriculture in the districts, to learn about and to establish
the current market rates of perennial and annual crops; wooden trees, fruit trees.
(vi) Analysed the results of survey and define the unit costs for compensating fixed assets (land,
structures), perennial and annual crops affected by the project in the selected communes.
Detailed results of survey on the substitution cost in each commune under process and would be
attached to the final report as Annex 4.
12.3. Proposed compensation unit prices
The Land compensation unit prices proposed for project are stated in below table. Other prices
are in attached Annex 4
Table 34: Land compensation unit prices proposed for project
No. Item Average unit price
Proposed
I Residential land
1 Tan Le commune 4,000,000
2 Hung Nhan town 7,000,000
3 Tan Hoa commune 3,000,000
4 Lien Hiep commune 3,000,000
5 Phuc Khanh commune 4,500,000
6 Thai Phuong commune 4,000,000
7 Hung Ha town 11,000,000
8 Minh Khai commune 7,000,000
9 Hong Linh commune 4,000,000
II.1 Annual crop land 46,000
II.2 Perennial tree land 50,000
III Fish pond land 46,000
75
12.4. Cost Estimates
The cost estimates for RP are including:
(a). Compensation for land and all kinds of assets on land and for both individual households
and public assets.
(b). All kinds of assistance (for income restoration/ improvement and for resettlement). With
payment of replacement cost for agricultural land, no assistance to land according to Decree 69/2009
is taken into account. The assistance is described as in table below.
(c). Cost for the resettlement site development would be refunded from the DPs, but assumes
that it would need to add to 20% of total compensation for residential land to improve for the sites.
(d). Cost of RP implementation (admin; putting the bench marks on the ground; cadastral map;
cost for DMS, for the commune working Teams, for consultation etc.): Take 2% from the total
compensation and assistance cost.
(e). Contingency: Takes 35% from the total cost of compensation, resettlement and assistance.
All detailed calculation of each item for the cost as tables below.
Table 35: Cost estimate for compensation and resettlement based on the replacement values
No. Item Quantity Average
unit Cost
Total Cost
(VND) Notes
A Compensation for land 13,639 - 65,272,453,880
I Residential land 13,447 64,338,260,000
1 Tan Le commune 1,278 4,000,000 5,112,000,000
2 Hung Nhan town 2,667 7,000,000 18,666,900,000
3 Tan Hoa commune 1,353 3,000,000 4,057,500,000
4 Lien Hiep commune 4,390 3,000,000 13,170,120,000
5 Phuc Khanh commune 1,099 4,500,000 4,947,300,000
6 Thai Phuong commune - 4,000,000 -
7 Hung Ha town 802 11,000,000 8,825,300,000
8 Minh Khai commune 709 7,000,000 4,960,900,000
9 Hong Linh commune 1,150 4,000,000 4,598,240,000
II.1 Annual crop land 19,489 46,000 896,506,880
II.2 Perennial tree land 577 50,000 28,855,000
III Fish pond land 192 46,000 8,832,000
B Compensation for buildings 805 2,684,530,000 See Tab.
35.2
1 Tan Le commune 34 2,500,000 84,500,000
2 Hung Nhan town 152 - 379,000,000
3 Tan Hoa commune 251 3,920,431 982,460,000
4 Lien Hiep commune 325 3,474,361 1,128,820,000
76
No. Item Quantity Average
unit Cost
Total Cost
(VND) Notes
5 Phuc Khanh commune - - -
6 Thai Phuong commune - - -
7 Hung Ha town 35 2,500,000 87,500,000
8 Minh Khai commune 9 - 22,250,000
9 Hong Linh commune - - -
C Compensation for sub-
structures 6,825 2.335.950.000
See Tab.
35.3
1 Tan Le commune 824 211,833 174,550,000
2 Hung Nhan town 620 461,742 286,280,000
3 Tan Hoa commune 1,053 1,784,644 1,879,230,000
4 Lien Hiep commune 1,852 254,390 471,130,000
5 Phuc Khanh commune 937 334,248 313,190,000
6 Thai Phuong commune - - -
7 Hung Ha town 368 214,538 78,950,000
8 Minh Khai commune 550 210,545 115,800,000
9 Hong Linh commune 621 286,345 177,820,000
D Compensation for trees 596 84,676,000 See Tab.35.4
1 Tan Le commune 77 179,545 13,825,000
2 Hung Nhan town 74 120,473 8,915,000
3 Tan Hoa commune 31 76,452 2,370,000
4 Lien Hiep commune 145 178,938 25,946,000
5 Phuc Khanh commune 170 99,588 16,930,000
6 Thai Phuong commune - - -
7 Hung Ha town 38 163,684 6,220,000
8 Minh Khai commune 19 211,579 4,020,000
9 Hong Linh commune 42 153,571 6,450,000
E Compensation for crops 8,941 53,418,000 See Tab.35.5
1 Tan Le commune 413 6,000 2,478,000
2 Hung Nhan town 1,942 5,883 11,424,000
3 Tan Hoa commune - - -
4 Lien Hiep commune 5,425 6,000 32,550,000
5 Phuc Khanh commune - - -
6 Thai Phuong commune 449 6,000 2,694,000
7 Hung Ha town - - -
8 Minh Khai commune 612 6,000 3,672,000
9 Hong Linh commune 100 6,000 600,000
77
No. Item Quantity Average
unit Cost
Total Cost
(VND) Notes
F Compensation for public
works 10,779 4,612,460,000 See Tab.35.6
1 Tan Le commune 1,959 86,175 168,826,000
2 Hung Nhan town 1,653 554,783 916,778,200
3 Tan Hoa commune 129 496,124 64,000,000
4 Lien Hiep commune 198 432,323 85,600,000
5 Phuc Khanh commune 333 50,000 16,670,000
6 Thai Phuong commune 718 132,312 95,000,000
7 Hung Ha town 339 5,015,915 1,701,900,000
8 Minh Khai commune 504 1,131,573 570,425,800
9 Hong Linh commune 3,659 67,673 247,583,000
10 Tan Le commune 1,287 47,632 61,302,000
11 Hung Nhan town 365 1,875,000 684,375,000
G Allowances 2,671,022,000 See Tab.35.7
1 Tan Le commune - - 79,435,000
2 Hung Nhan town - - 577,921,000
3 Tan Hoa commune - - 39,680,000
4 Lien Hiep commune - - 1,171,636,000
5 Phuc Khanh commune - - 489,492,000
6 Thai Phuong commune - - 45,861,000
7 Hung Ha town - - 21,200,000
8 Minh Khai commune - - 107,309,000
9 Hong Linh commune - - 138,488,000
H Subtotal (A+…+G) 41.931 77.714.509.880
I Administration and
implementation (2% from E) 1.554.290.198
K
Cost subsidize to the
relocation site development
(20% from A)
12.867.652.000
L External monitoring 1.252.592.000 See Tab.35.8
M Subtotal (H+I+K+L) 93.389.044.078
N Contingency (physical and
inflation) (35% from M) 32.686.165.427
Grand total (VND) 126.075.209.505
Grand total (USD) 6.003.581
The budget for RP (All items as calculated above) will be from the Government of Viet Nam
(Counterpart Fund). External monitoring cost would be from IDA.
78
Table 35. 1: Breakdown by commune
No. Commune Compensation Allowances
Resettlement
(20% Residential
land)
Implementation Monitoring Contingency Total
(1) (2) (3)
(4)= 2%
[(1)+(2)] (5)
(6)=35%[(1)+ (2)+
(3)+(4)+(5)] (7)
I Hung Ha district,
Thai Binh province 74,297,810,880 2,671,022,000 12,867,652,000 1,539,376,658 1,024,848,000 32,340,248,338 124,740,957,876
1 Tan Le commune 5,575,269,000 79,435,000 1,022,400,000 113,094,080 113,872,000 2,416,424,528 9,320,494,608
2 Hung Nhan town 20,553,792,800 577,921,000 3,733,380,000 422,634,276 113,872,000 8,890,560,027 34,292,160,103
3 Tan Hoa commune 5,839,460,000 39,680,000 811,500,000 117,582,800 113,872,000 2,422,733,180 9,344,827,980
4 Lien Hiep commune 15,455,332,080 1,171,636,000 2,634,024,000 332,539,362 113,872,000 6,897,591,205 26,604,994,646
5 Phuc Khanh
commune 5,310,322,000 489,492,000 989,460,000 115,996,280 113,872,000 2,456,699,798 9,475,842,078
6 Thai Phuong
commune 118,329,600 45,861,000 - 3,283,812 113,872,000 98,471,244 379,817,656
7 Hung Ha town 10,699,870,000 21,200,000 1,765,060,000 214,421,400 113,872,000 4,485,048,190 17,299,471,590
8 Minh Khai commune 5,704,695,400 107,309,000 992,180,000 116,240,088 113,872,000 2,462,003,771 9,496,300,259
9 Hong Linh commune 5,040,740,000 138,488,000 919,648,000 103,584,560 113,872,000 2,210,716,396 8,527,048,956
II Dong Hung district,
Thai Binh province 61,302,000 - - 1,226,040 113,872,000 61,740,014 238,140,054
1 Minh Tan commune 61,302,000 - - 1,226,040 113,872,000 61,740,014 238,140,054
III Tien Lu district,
Hung Yen province 684,375,000 - - 13,687,500 113,872,000 284,177,075 1,096,111,575
1 Thien Phien
commune 684,375,000 - - 13,687,500 113,872,000 284,177,075 1,096,111,575
Total (VND) 75,043,487,880 2,671,022,000 12,867,652,000 1,554,290,198 1,252,592,000 32,686,165,427 126,075,209,505
Total (USD) 3,573,499.42 127,191.52 612,745.33 74,013.82 59,647.24 1,556,484.07 6,003,581
Funded by GOV GOV GOV GOV IDA GOV GOV+IDA
79
Table 35. 2: Compensation for buildings
No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Cost
(VND)
Total Cost
(VND) Notes
1 Tan Le
33.8
84,500,000
House with 1 floor VND/m2 floor 33.8 2,500,000 84,500,000
House with 2 floor VND/m2 floor - 3,600,000 -
House with 3 floor VND/m2 floor - 4,200,000 -
House with 4 floor VND/m2 floor - 4,300,000 -
Temporary house VND/m2 floor - 2,500,000 -
2 Hung Nhan town
151.6
379,000,000
House with 1 floor VND/m2 floor 151.6 2,500,000 379,000,000
House with 2 floor VND/m2 floor
3,600,000 -
House with 3 floor VND/m2 floor - 4,200,000 -
House with 4 floor VND/m2 floor - 4,300,000 -
Temporary house VND/m2 floor - 2,500,000 -
3 Tan Hoa
250.6
982,460,000
House with 1 floor VND/m2 floor 17.0 2,500,000 42,500,000
House with 2 floor VND/m2 floor 68.6 3,600,000 246,960,000
House with 3 floor VND/m2 floor 165.0 4,200,000 693,000,000
House with 4 floor VND/m2 floor - 4,300,000 -
Temporary house VND/m2 floor - 2,500,000 -
4 Lien Hiep
324.9
1,128,820,000
House with 1 floor VND/m2 floor 80.8 2,500,000 202,000,000
House with 2 floor VND/m2 floor 164.0 3,600,000 590,400,000
House with 3 floor VND/m2 floor 80.1 4,200,000 336,420,000
House with 4 floor VND/m2 floor
4,300,000 -
Temporary house VND/m2 floor
2,500,000 -
5 Phuc Khanh
-
-
House with 1 floor VND/m2 floor - 2,500,000 -
House with 2 floor VND/m2 floor - 3,600,000 -
House with 3 floor VND/m2 floor - 4,200,000 -
House with 4 floor VND/m2 floor - 4,300,000 -
Temporary house VND/m2 floor - 2,500,000 -
80
No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Cost
(VND)
Total Cost
(VND) Notes
6 Thai Phuong
-
-
House with 1 floor VND/m2 floor - 2,500,000 -
House with 2 floor VND/m2 floor - 3,600,000 -
House with 3 floor VND/m2 floor - 4,200,000 -
House with 4 floor VND/m2 floor - 4,300,000 -
Temporary house VND/m2 floor - 2,500,000 -
7 Hung Ha town
35.0
87,500,000
House with 1 floor VND/m2 floor 35.0 2,500,000 87,500,000
House with 2 floor VND/m2 floor - 3,600,000 -
House with 3 floor VND/m2 floor - 4,200,000 -
House with 4 floor VND/m2 floor - 4,300,000 -
Temporary house VND/m2 floor - 2,500,000 -
8 Minh Khai
8.9
22,250,000
House with 1 floor VND/m2 floor 8.9 2,500,000 22,250,000
House with 2 floor VND/m2 floor - 3,600,000 -
House with 3 floor VND/m2 floor - 4,200,000 -
House with 4 floor VND/m2 floor - 4,300,000 -
Temporary house VND/m2 floor - 2,500,000 -
9 Hong Linh
-
-
House with 1 floor VND/m2 floor - 2,500,000 -
House with 2 floor VND/m2 floor - 3,600,000 -
House with 3 floor VND/m2 floor - 4,200,000 -
House with 4 floor VND/m2 floor - 4,300,000 -
Temporary house VND/m2 floor - 2,500,000 -
Total
804.8
2,684,530,000
81
Table 35. 3: Compensation for substructures
No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Cost
(VND)
Total Cost
(VND) Notes
I Tan Le
824
174,550,000
1 Affected kitchen outside house VND/m2 - 2,500,000 -
2 Affected cow shed VND/m2 - 1,200,000 -
3 Affected power meter VND/unit - 100,000 -
4 Affected fence VND/m2 - 80,000 -
5 Affected gate VND/m2 22 220,000 4,840,000
6 Affected toilet VND/m2 - 8,600,000 -
7 Affected well VND/unit 1 1,500,000 1,500,000
8 Affected tank VND/m3 - 1,500,000 -
9 Brick yard VND/m2 801 210,000 168,210,000
10 Fish pond VND/m3 - 670,000 -
II Hung Nhan town
620
286,280,000
1 Affected kitchen outside house VND/m2 60 2,500,000 150,000,000
2 Affected cow shed VND/m2 - 1,200,000 -
3 Affected power meter VND/unit 1 100,000 100,000
4 Affected fence VND/m2 30 80,000 2,400,000
5 Affected gate VND/m2 42 220,000 9,240,000
6 Affected toilet VND/m2 - 8,600,000 -
7 Affected well VND/unit 3 1,500,000 4,500,000
8 Affected tank VND/m3 - 1,500,000 -
9 Brick yard VND/m2 444 210,000 93,240,000
10 Fish pond VND/m3 40 670,000 26,800,000
III Tan Hoa
1,053
718,230,000
1 Affected kitchen outside house VND/m2 103 2,500,000 257,500,000
2 Affected cow shed VND/m2 10 1,200,000 12,000,000
3 Affected power meter VND/unit - 100,000 -
82
No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Cost
(VND)
Total Cost
(VND) Notes
4 Affected fence VND/m2 300 80,000 24,000,000
5 Affected gate VND/m2 31 220,000 6,820,000
6 Affected toilet VND/m2 15 8,600,000 129,000,000
7 Affected well VND/unit 1 1,500,000 1,500,000
8 Affected tank VND/m3 20 1,500,000 30,000,000
9 Brick yard VND/m2 275 210,000 57,750,000
10 Fish pond VND/m3 298 670,000 199,660,000
IV Lien Hiep
1,852
471,130,000
1 Affected kitchen outside house VND/m2 30 2,500,000 75,000,000
2 Affected cow shed VND/m2 30 1,200,000 36,000,000
3 Affected power meter VND/unit - 100,000 -
4 Affected fence VND/m2 145 80,000 11,600,000
5 Affected gate VND/m2 137 220,000 30,140,000
6 Affected toilet VND/m2 - 8,600,000 -
7 Affected well VND/unit 1 1,500,000 1,500,000
8 Affected tank VND/m3 - 1,500,000 -
9 Brick yard VND/m2 1,509 210,000 316,890,000
10 Fish pond VND/m3 - 670,000 -
V Phuc Khanh
937
313,190,000
1 Affected kitchen outside house VND/m2 10 2,500,000 25,000,000
2 Affected cow shed VND/m2 20 1,200,000 24,000,000
3 Affected power meter VND/unit - 100,000 -
4 Affected fence VND/m2 149 80,000 11,920,000
5 Affected gate VND/m2 109 220,000 23,980,000
6 Affected toilet VND/m2 - 8,600,000 -
7 Affected well VND/unit - 1,500,000 -
8 Affected tank VND/m3 - 1,500,000 -
83
No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Cost
(VND)
Total Cost
(VND) Notes
9 Brick yard VND/m2 449 210,000 94,290,000
10 Fish pond VND/m3 200 670,000 134,000,000
VI Thai Phuong
-
-
1 Affected kitchen outside house VND/m2 - 2,500,000 -
2 Affected cow shed VND/m2 - 1,200,000 -
3 Affected power meter VND/unit - 100,000 -
4 Affected fence VND/m2 - 80,000 -
5 Affected gate VND/m2 - 220,000 -
6 Affected toilet VND/m2 - 8,600,000 -
7 Affected well VND/unit - 1,500,000 -
8 Affected tank VND/m3 - 1,500,000 -
9 Brick yard VND/m2 - 210,000 -
10 Fish pond VND/m3 - 670,000 -
VII Hung Ha town
368
78,950,000
1 Affected kitchen outside house VND/m2 - 2,500,000 -
2 Affected cow shed VND/m2 - 1,200,000 -
3 Affected power meter VND/unit - 100,000 -
4 Affected fence VND/m2 - 80,000 -
5 Affected gate VND/m2 38 220,000 8,360,000
6 Affected toilet VND/m2 - 8,600,000 -
7 Affected well VND/unit 1 1,500,000 1,500,000
8 Affected tank VND/m3 - 1,500,000 -
9 Brick yard VND/m2 329 210,000 69,090,000
10 Fish pond VND/m3 - 670,000 -
VIII Minh Khai
550
115,800,000
1 Affected kitchen outside house VND/m2 - 2,500,000 -
2 Affected cow shed VND/m2 - 1,200,000 -
84
No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Cost
(VND)
Total Cost
(VND) Notes
3 Affected power meter VND/unit - 100,000 -
4 Affected fence VND/m2 - 80,000 -
5 Affected gate VND/m2 30 220,000 6,600,000
6 Affected toilet VND/m2 - 86,000,000 -
7 Affected well VND/unit - 1,500,000 -
8 Affected tank VND/m3 - 1,500,000 -
9 Brick yard VND/m2 520 210,000 109,200,000
10 Fish pond VND/m3 - 670,000 -
IX Hong Linh
621
177,820,000
1 Affected kitchen outside house VND/m2 20 2,500,000 50,000,000
2 Affected cow shed VND/m2 - 1,200,000 -
3 Affected power meter VND/unit - 100,000 -
4 Affected fence VND/m2 - 80,000 -
5 Affected gate VND/m2 32 220,000 7,040,000
6 Affected toilet VND/m2 - 86,000,000 -
7 Affected well VND/unit - 1,500,000 -
8 Affected tank VND/m3 1 1,500,000 1,500,000
9 Brick yard VND/m2 568 210,000 119,280,000
10 Fish pond VND/m3 - 670,000 -
Total
6,825
2,335,950,000
85
Table 35. 4: Compensation for trees
No. Item Unit Quantity Unit
Cost
Total Cost
(VND) Notes
I Tan Le
77
13,825,000
1 Longan (diameter 20-
25cm) VND/tree 36 235,000 8,460,000
2 Litchi VND/tree - 235,000 -
3 Jackfruit VND/tree 1 120,000 120,000
4 “Doi” VND/tree - 170,000 -
5 Mango VND/tree 2 170,000 340,000
6 “Na” VND/tree - 170,000 -
7 Guava VND/tree 5 210,000 1,050,000
8 Banana VND/clump - 35,000 -
9 Grapefruit VND/tree 5 170,000 850,000
10 “Xoan” VND/tree - 140,000 -
11 “Bang” VND/tree 3 180,000 540,000
12 “Xanh” VND/tree 21 100,000 2,100,000
13 “Si” VND/tree 1 80,000 80,000
14 “Loc Vung” VND/tree 3 95,000 285,000
15 “Hoa sua” VND/tree - 60,000 -
16 Peach VND/tree - 60,000 -
17 “Lan” VND/tree - 21,000 -
18 Sapodilla VND/tree - 170,000 -
II Hung Nhan town
74
8,915,000
1 Longan (diameter 20-
25cm) VND/tree 21 235,000 4,935,000
2 Litchi VND/tree - 235,000 -
3 Jackfruit VND/tree - 120,000 -
4 “Doi” VND/tree 1 170,000 170,000
5 Mango VND/tree 3 170,000 510,000
86
No. Item Unit Quantity Unit
Cost
Total Cost
(VND) Notes
6 “Na” VND/tree - 170,000 -
7 Guava VND/tree - 210,000 -
8 Banana VND/clump 30 35,000 1,050,000
9 Grapefruit VND/tree 5 170,000 850,000
10 “Xoan” VND/tree 1 140,000 140,000
11 “Bang” VND/tree 1 180,000 180,000
12 “Xanh” VND/tree 6 100,000 600,000
13 “Si” VND/tree 6 80,000 480,000
14 “Loc Vung” VND/tree - 95,000 -
15 “Hoa sua” VND/tree - 60,000 -
16 Peach VND/tree - 60,000 -
17 “Lan” VND/tree - 21,000 -
18 Sapodilla VND/tree - 170,000 -
III Tan Hoa
31
2,370,000
1 Longan (diameter 20-
25cm) VND/tree 2 235,000 470,000
2 Litchi VND/tree - 235,000 -
3 Jackfruit VND/tree 2 120,000 240,000
4 “Doi” VND/tree - 170,000 -
5 Mango VND/tree 3 170,000 510,000
6 “Na” VND/tree 1 170,000 170,000
7 Guava VND/tree 1 210,000 210,000
8 Banana VND/clump 22 35,000 770,000
9 Grapefruit VND/tree - 170,000 -
10 “Xoan” VND/tree - 140,000 -
11 “Bang” VND/tree - 180,000 -
12 “Xanh” VND/tree - 100,000 -
13 “Si” VND/tree - 80,000 -
87
No. Item Unit Quantity Unit
Cost
Total Cost
(VND) Notes
14 “Loc Vung” VND/tree - 95,000 -
15 “Hoa sua” VND/tree - 60,000 -
16 Peach VND/tree - 60,000 -
17 “Lan” VND/tree - 21,000 -
18 Sapodilla VND/tree - 170,000 -
IV Lien Hiep
145
25,946,000
1 Longan (diameter 20-
25cm) VND/tree 62 235,000 14,570,000
2 Litchi VND/tree 12 235,000 2,820,000
3 Jackfruit VND/tree 5 120,000 600,000
4 “Doi” VND/tree 1 170,000 170,000
5 Mango VND/tree 8 170,000 1,360,000
6 “Na” VND/tree 3 170,000 510,000
7 Guava VND/tree 7 210,000 1,470,000
8 Banana VND/clump 21 35,000 735,000
9 Grapefruit VND/tree 4 170,000 680,000
10 “Xoan” VND/tree 4 140,000 560,000
11 “Bang” VND/tree 9 180,000 1,620,000
12 “Xanh” VND/tree 6 100,000 600,000
13 “Si” VND/tree - 80,000 -
14 “Loc Vung” VND/tree - 95,000 -
15 “Hoa sua” VND/tree 1 60,000 60,000
16 Peach VND/tree - 60,000 -
17 “Lan” VND/tree 1 21,000 21,000
18 Sapodilla VND/tree 1 170,000 170,000
V Phuc Khanh
170
16,930,000
1 Longan (diameter 20-
25cm) VND/tree 21 235,000 4,935,000
88
No. Item Unit Quantity Unit
Cost
Total Cost
(VND) Notes
2 Litchi VND/tree 4 235,000 940,000
3 Jackfruit VND/tree 1 120,000 120,000
4 “Doi” VND/tree - 170,000 -
5 Mango VND/tree 4 170,000 680,000
6 “Na” VND/tree - 170,000 -
7 Guava VND/tree - 210,000 -
8 Banana VND/clump 80 35,000 2,800,000
9 Grapefruit VND/tree
170,000 -
10 “Xoan” VND/tree 18 140,000 2,520,000
11 “Bang” VND/tree 12 180,000 2,160,000
12 “Xanh” VND/tree 16 100,000 1,600,000
13 “Si” VND/tree 8 80,000 640,000
14 “Loc Vung” VND/tree 5 95,000 475,000
15 “Hoa sua” VND/tree - 60,000 -
16 Peach VND/tree 1 60,000 60,000
17 “Lan” VND/tree - 21,000 -
18 Sapodilla VND/tree - 170,000 -
VI Thai Phuong
-
-
1 Longan (diameter 20-
25cm) VND/tree - 235,000 -
2 Litchi VND/tree - 235,000 -
3 Jackfruit VND/tree - 120,000 -
4 “Doi” VND/tree - 170,000 -
5 Mango VND/tree - 170,000 -
6 “Na” VND/tree - 170,000 -
7 Guava VND/tree - 210,000 -
8 Banana VND/clump - 35,000 -
9 Grapefruit VND/tree - 170,000 -
89
No. Item Unit Quantity Unit
Cost
Total Cost
(VND) Notes
10 “Xoan” VND/tree - 140,000 -
11 “Bang” VND/tree - 180,000 -
12 “Xanh” VND/tree - 100,000 -
13 “Si” VND/tree - 80,000 -
14 “Loc Vung” VND/tree - 95,000 -
15 “Hoa sua” VND/tree - 60,000 -
16 Peach VND/tree - 60,000 -
17 “Lan” VND/tree - 21,000 -
18 Sapodilla VND/tree - 170,000 -
VII Hung Ha town
38
6,220,000
1 Longan (diameter 20-
25cm) VND/tree 19 235,000 4,465,000
2 Litchi VND/tree - 235,000 -
3 Jackfruit VND/tree - 120,000 -
4 “Doi” VND/tree 1 170,000 170,000
5 Mango VND/tree 2 170,000 340,000
6 “Na” VND/tree 3 170,000 510,000
7 Guava VND/tree - 210,000 -
8 Banana VND/clump 11 35,000 385,000
9 Grapefruit VND/tree 1 170,000 170,000
10 “Xoan” VND/tree - 140,000 -
11 “Bang” VND/tree 1 180,000 180,000
12 “Xanh” VND/tree - 100,000 -
13 “Si” VND/tree - 80,000 -
14 “Loc Vung” VND/tree - 95,000 -
15 “Hoa sua” VND/tree - 60,000 -
16 Peach VND/tree - 60,000 -
17 “Lan” VND/tree - 21,000 -
90
No. Item Unit Quantity Unit
Cost
Total Cost
(VND) Notes
18 Sapodilla VND/tree - 170,000 -
VIII Minh Khai
19
4,020,000
1 Longan (diameter 20-
25cm) VND/tree 12 235,000 2,820,000
2 Litchi VND/tree - 235,000 -
3 Jackfruit VND/tree - 120,000 -
4 “Doi” VND/tree 1 170,000 170,000
5 Mango VND/tree 3 170,000 510,000
6 “Na” VND/tree 1 170,000 170,000
7 Guava VND/tree - 210,000 -
8 Banana VND/clump - 35,000 -
9 Grapefruit VND/tree 1 170,000 170,000
10 “Xoan” VND/tree - 140,000 -
11 “Bang” VND/tree 1 180,000 180,000
12 “Xanh” VND/tree - 100,000 -
13 “Si” VND/tree - 80,000 -
14 “Loc Vung” VND/tree - 95,000 -
15 “Hoa sua” VND/tree - 60,000 -
16 Peach VND/tree - 60,000 -
17 “Lan” VND/tree - 21,000 -
18 Sapodilla VND/tree - 170,000 -
IX Hong Linh
42
6,450,000
1 Longan (diameter 20-
25cm) VND/tree 10 235,000 2,350,000
2 Litchi VND/tree 2 235,000 470,000
3 Jackfruit VND/tree 1 120,000 120,000
4 “Doi” VND/tree - 170,000 -
5 Mango VND/tree 3 170,000 510,000
91
No. Item Unit Quantity Unit
Cost
Total Cost
(VND) Notes
6 “Na” VND/tree 2 170,000 340,000
7 Guava VND/tree 1 210,000 210,000
8 Banana VND/clump 2 35,000 70,000
9 Grapefruit VND/tree - 170,000 -
10 “Xoan” VND/tree - 140,000 -
11 “Bang” VND/tree 4 180,000 720,000
12 “Xanh” VND/tree 16 100,000 1,600,000
13 “Si” VND/tree - 80,000 -
14 “Loc Vung” VND/tree - 95,000 -
15 “Hoa sua” VND/tree 1 60,000 60,000
16 Peach VND/tree - 60,000 -
17 “Lan” VND/tree - 21,000 -
18 Sapodilla VND/tree - 170,000 -
Total
596
84,676,000
92
Table 35. 5: Compensation for crops
No. Item Unit Quantity Unit
Cost
Total Cost
(VND) Notes
I Tan Le
413
2,478,000
1 Corn VND/m2 - 5,000 -
2 Rice VND/m2 413 6,000 2,478,000
II Hung Nhan town
1,942
11,424,000
1 Corn VND/m2 228 5,000 1,140,000
2 Rice VND/m2 1,714 6,000 10,284,000
III Tan Hoa
-
-
1 Corn VND/m2 - 5,000 -
2 Rice VND/m2 - 6,000 -
IV Lien Hiep
5,425
32,550,000
1 Corn VND/m2 - 5,000 -
2 Rice VND/m2 5,425 6,000 32,550,000
V Phuc Khanh
-
-
1 Corn VND/m2 - 5,000 -
2 Rice VND/m2 - 6,000 -
VI Thai Phuong
449
2,694,000
1 Corn VND/m2 - 5,000 -
2 Rice VND/m2 449 6,000 2,694,000
VII Hung Ha town
-
-
1 Corn VND/m2 - 5,000 -
2 Rice VND/m2 - 6,000 -
VIII Minh Khai
612
3,672,000
1 Corn VND/m2 - 5,000 -
2 Rice VND/m2 612 6,000 3,672,000
IX Hong Linh
100
600,000
1 Corn VND/m2 - 5,000 -
2 Rice VND/m2 100 6,000 600,000
Total
8,941
53,418,000
93
Table 35. 6: Compensation for public works
No. Commune Owner Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost
(VND)
1. Tan Le
Subtotal
1,959.1
168,826,000.0
Residential land CPC m2 - 1,875,000
Specific use land Trieu Duong
post office m
2 13.4 1,875,000 25,125,000
Religious land CPC m2 - 938,000
Cemetery land CPC m2 - 938,000
Other non-agricultural
land CPC m
2 - 938,000 -
Annual crop land CPC m2 23.7 46,000 1,090,200
Perennial tree land CPC m2 568.7 50,000 28,435,000
Fish pond land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Irrigation canal land CPC m2 1,247.3 46,000 57,375,800
Electric pole Hung Ha
Power Service pole 26.0 2,000,000 52,000,000
Electric wire Hung Ha
Power Service m 80.0 60,000 4,800,000
2. Hung
Nhan town
Subtotal
1,652.5
916,778,200.0
Residential land CPC m2 125.8 6,250,000 786,250,000
Specific use land CPC m2 - 6,250,000 -
Religious land CPC m2 - 3,125,000 -
Cemetery land CPC m2 - 3,125,000 -
Other non-agricultural
land CPC m
2 - 3,125,000 -
Annual crop land CPC m2 1,376.7 46,000 63,328,200
Perennial tree land CPC m2 - 50,000 -
Fish pond land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Irrigation canal land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Electric pole Hung Ha
Power Service pole 30.0 2,000,000 60,000,000
Electric wire Hung Ha
Power Service m 120.0 60,000 7,200,000
3. Tan Hoa
Subtotal
129.0
64,000,000.0
Residential land CPC m2 - 1,000,000 -
Specific use land CPC m2 - 1,000,000 -
94
No. Commune Owner Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost
(VND)
Religious land CPC m2 - 500,000 -
Cemetery land CPC m2
500,000 -
Other non-agricultural
land CPC m
2 - 500,000 -
Annual crop land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Perennial tree land CPC m2 - 50,000 -
Fish pond land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Irrigation canal land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Electric pole Hung Ha
Power Service pole 29.0 2,000,000 58,000,000
Electric wire Hung Ha
Power Service m 100.0 60,000 6,000,000
4. Lien
Hiep
Subtotal
198.0
85,600,000.0
Residential land CPC m2 - 875,000 -
Specific use land CPC m2 - 875,000 -
Religious land CPC m2 - 437,500 -
Cemetery land CPC m2
437,500 -
Other non-agricultural
land CPC m
2 - 437,500 -
Annual crop land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Perennial tree land CPC m2 - 50,000 -
Fish pond land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Irrigation canal land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Electric pole Hung Ha
Power Service pole 38.0 2,000,000 76,000,000
Electric wire Hung Ha
Power Service m 160.0 60,000 9,600,000
5. Phuc
Khanh
Subtotal
333.4
16,670,000.0
Residential land CPC m2 - 3,125,000 -
Specific use land CPC m2 - 3,125,000 -
Religious land CPC m2 - 1,562,500 -
Cemetery land CPC m2
1,562,500 -
Other non-agricultural
land CPC m
2 - 1,562,500 -
95
No. Commune Owner Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost
(VND)
Annual crop land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Perennial tree land CPC m2 261.4 50,000 13,070,000
Fish pond land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Irrigation canal land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Electric pole Hung Ha
Power Service pole 12.0 2,000,000
Electric wire Hung Ha
Power Service m 60.0 60,000 3,600,000
6. Thai
Phuong
Subtotal
718.0
95,000,000.0
Residential land CPC m2 - 2,500,000 -
Specific use land CPC m2 - 2,500,000 -
Religious land CPC m2 - 1,250,000 -
Cemetery land CPC m2 - 1,250,000 -
Other non-agricultural
land CPC m
2 - 1,250,000 -
Annual crop land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Perennial tree land CPC m2 628.0 50,000 31,400,000
Fish pond land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Irrigation canal land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Electric pole Hung Ha
Power Service pole 30.0 2,000,000 60,000,000
Electric wire Hung Ha
Power Service m 60.0 60,000 3,600,000
7. Hung
Ha town
Subtotal
339.3
1,701,900,000.0
Residential land CPC m2 - 10,000,000 -
Specific use land CPC m2 114.0 10,000,000 1,140,000,000
Religious land CPC m2 - 5,000,000 -
Cemetery land CPC m2 - 5,000,000 -
Other non-agricultural
land CPC m
2 95.3 5,000,000 476,500,000
Annual crop land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Perennial tree land CPC m2 - 50,000 -
Fish pond land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Irrigation canal land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
96
No. Commune Owner Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost
(VND)
Electric pole Hung Ha
Power Service pole 40.0 2,000,000 80,000,000
Electric wire Hung Ha
Power Service m 90.0 60,000 5,400,000
8. Minh
Khai
Subtotal
504.1
570,425,800.0
Residential land CPC m2 - 3,750,000 -
Specific use land CPC m2 137.0 3,750,000 513,750,000
Religious land CPC m2 - 1,875,000 -
Cemetery land CPC m2 - 1,875,000 -
Other non-agricultural
land CPC m
2 - 1,875,000 -
Annual crop land CPC m2 294.8 46,000 13,560,800
Perennial tree land CPC m2 2.3 50,000 115,000
Fish pond land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Irrigation canal land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Electric pole Hung Ha
Power Service pole 20.0 2,000,000 40,000,000
Electric wire Hung Ha
Power Service m 50.0 60,000 3,000,000
9. Hong
Linh
Subtotal
3,658.5
247,583,000.0
Residential land CPC m2 - 1,250,000 -
Specific use land CPC m2 - 1,250,000 -
Religious land CPC m2 - 625,000 -
Cemetery land CPC m2 - 625,000 -
Other non-agricultural
land CPC m
2 - 625,000 -
Annual crop land CPC m2 3,535.5 46,000 162,633,000
Perennial tree land CPC m2 3.0 50,000 150,000
Fish pond land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Irrigation canal land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Electric pole Hung Ha
Power Service pole 40.0 2,000,000 80,000,000
Electric wire Hung Ha
Power Service m 80.0 60,000 4,800,000
97
No. Commune Owner Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost
(VND)
10. Minh
Tân
Subtotal
1,287.0
61,302,000.0
Residential land CPC m2 - 1,250,000 -
Specific use land CPC m2 - 1,250,000 -
Religious land CPC m2 - 625,000 -
Cemetery land CPC m2 - 625,000 -
Other non-agricultural
land CPC m
2 - 625,000 -
Annual crop land CPC m2 640.0 46,000 29,440,000
Perennial tree land CPC m2 525.0 50,000 26,250,000
Fish pond land CPC m2 - 46,000 -
Irrigation canal land CPC m2 122.0 46,000 5,612,000
Electric pole Hung Ha
Power Service pole - 2,000,000 -
Electric wire Hung Ha
Power Service m - 60,000 -
11.Thien
Phien, Tien
Lu, Hung
Yen
province
Subtotal
365.0
684,375,000.0
Residential land CPC m2
1,875,000
Specific use land CPC m2 365.0 1,875,000 684,375,000
Religious land CPC m2
938,000
Cemetery land CPC m
2
938,000
Other non-agricultural
land CPC m
2
938,000 -
Annual crop land CPC m2
46,000 -
Perennial tree land CPC m2
50,000 -
Fish pond land CPC m2
46,000 -
Irrigation canal land CPC m2
46,000 -
Electric pole Tien Lu Power
Service pole
2,000,000 -
Electric wire Tien Lu Power
Service m
60,000 -
Total
11,143.9
4,612,460,000.0
98
Table 35. 7: Allowances
No. Item Unit Qty Unit Cost Total Cost (VND) Notes
1 Tan Le
79,435,000
1.1 Moving within a Province VND/HH 2 5,000,000 10,000,000
Article 14, Decision 16/2009/QĐ-
UBND of Thai Binh and Article 18,
Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
1.2 Assistance for renting house VND/HH 2 4,200,000 8,400,000
Item 3, Article 14, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and item 3,
Article 18, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
1.3 Assistance for stabilizing the livelihood
Item 1(b); Article 16, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Article 20,
Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
1.3.1 Acquiring with from 10% to 30% and from
30% to70% of agricultural land Per head
a Do not have to move house
5 2,880,000 14,400,000
b Have to move house to new place
- 5,760,000 -
1.3.2 Acquiring more than 70% of total agricultural
land Per head
a Do not have to move house
- 5,760,000 -
b Have to move house to new place
- 11,520,000 -
1.4 Assistance for changing jobs and
employment VND/m
2 415 69,000 28,635,000
Item 1 (a); Article 18, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND of Thai Binh and
Article 22, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
1.5 Assist to fish pond, garden land VND/m2 - 2,000,000 -
Item 1 Article 17,
Decision16/2009/QĐ-UBND and
Item 1, Article 21, Decree
69/2009/NĐ-CP
1.6 Assist to agricultural land in residential area VND/m2 - 1,000,000 - Item 2 Article 17, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Item 2,
Article 21, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
1.7 Assist to social VND/user 3 6,000,000 18,000,000 Proposal
99
No. Item Unit Qty Unit Cost Total Cost (VND) Notes
2 Hung Nhan town
577,921,000
2.1 Moving within a Province VND/HH 5 5,000,000 25,000,000
Article 14, Decision 16/2009/QĐ-
UBND of Thai Binh and Article 18,
Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
2.2 Assistance for renting house VND/HH 5 4,200,000 21,000,000
Item 3, Article 14, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and item 3,
Article 18, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
2.3 Assistance for stabilizing the livelihood
Item 1(b); Article 16, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Article 20,
Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
2.3.1 Acquiring with from 10% to 30% and from
30% to70% of agricultural land Per head
-
a Do not have to move house
20 2,880,000 57,600,000
b Have to move house to new place
- 5,760,000 -
2.3.2 Acquiring more than 70% of total agricultural
land Per head
a Do not have to move house
5 5,760,000 28,800,000
b Have to move house to new place
- 11,520,000 -
2.4 Assistance for changing jobs and
employment VND/m
2 6,109 69,000 421,521,000
Item 1 (a); Article 18, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND of Thai Binh and
Article 22, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
2.5 Assist to fish pond, garden land VND/m2 - 3,500,000 -
Item 1 Article 17,
Decision16/2009/QĐ-UBND and
Item 1, Article 21, Decree
69/2009/NĐ-CP
2.6 Assist to agricultural land in residential area VND/m2 - 1,750,000 -
Item 2 Article 17, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Item 2,
Article 21, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
2.7 Assist to social VND/user 4 6,000,000 24,000,000 Proposal
100
No. Item Unit Qty Unit Cost Total Cost (VND) Notes
3 Tan Hoa
39,680,000
3.1 Moving within a Province VND/HH 4 5,000,000 20,000,000
Article 14, Decision 16/2009/QĐ-
UBND of Thai Binh and Article 18,
Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
3.2 Assistance for renting house VND/HH 4 4,200,000 16,800,000
Item 3, Article 14, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and item 3,
Article 18, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
3.3 Assistance for stabilizing the livelihood
Item 1(b); Article 16, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Article 20,
Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
3.3.1 Acquiring with from 10% to 30% and from
30% to70% of agricultural land Per head
a Do not have to move house
1 2,880,000 2,880,000
b Have to move house to new place
5,760,000 -
3.3.2 Acquiring more than 70% of total agricultural
land Per head
-
a Do not have to move house
- 5,760,000 -
b Have to move house to new place
- 11,520,000 -
3.4 Assistance for changing jobs and
employment VND/m
2 - 69,000 -
Item 1 (a); Article 18, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND of Thai Binh and
Article 22, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
3.5 Assist to fish pond, garden land VND/m2 - 1,500,000 -
Item 1 Article 17,
Decision16/2009/QĐ-UBND and
Item 1, Article 21, Decree
69/2009/NĐ-CP
3.6 Assist to agricultural land in residential area VND/m2 - 750,000 -
Item 2 Article 17, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Item 2,
Article 21, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
3.7 Assist to social VND/user - 6,000,000 - Proposal
101
No. Item Unit Qty Unit Cost Total Cost (VND) Notes
4 Lien Hiep
1,171,636,000
4.1 Moving within a Province VND/HH 14 5,000,000 70,000,000
Article 14, Decision 16/2009/QĐ-
UBND of Thai Binh and Article 18,
Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
4.2 Assistance for renting house VND/HH 14 4,200,000 58,800,000
Item 3, Article 14, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and item 3,
Article 18, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
4.3 Assistance for stabilizing the livelihood
Item 1(b); Article 16, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Article 20,
Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
4.3.1 Acquiring with from 10% to 30% and from
30% to70% of agricultural land Per head
a Do not have to move house
43 2,880,000 123,840,000
b Have to move house to new place
- 5,760,000 -
4.3.2 Acquiring more than 70% of total agricultural
land Per head
a Do not have to move house
3 5,760,000 17,280,000
b Have to move house to new place
- 11,520,000 -
4.4 Assistance for changing jobs and
employment VND/m
2 11,764 69,000 811,716,000
Item 1 (a); Article 18, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND of Thai Binh and
Article 22, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
4.5 Assist to fish pond, garden land VND/m2 - 1,500,000 -
Item 1 Article 17,
Decision16/2009/QĐ-UBND and
Item 1, Article 21, Decree
69/2009/NĐ-CP
4.6 Assist to agricultural land in residential area VND/m2 - 750,000 -
Item 2 Article 17, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Item 2,
Article 21, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
4.7 Assist to social VND/user 15 6,000,000 90,000,000 Proposal
102
No. Item Unit Qty Unit Cost Total Cost (VND) Notes
5 Phuc Khanh
489,492,000
5.1 Moving within a Province VND/HH - 5,000,000 -
Article 14, Decision 16/2009/QĐ-
UBND of Thai Binh and Article 18,
Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
5.2 Assistance for renting house VND/HH - 4,200,000 -
Item 3, Article 14, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and item 3,
Article 18, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
5.3 Assistance for stabilizing the livelihood
Item 1(b); Article 16, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Article 20,
Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
5.3.1 Acquiring with from 10% to 30% and from
30% to70% of agricultural land Per head
a Do not have to move house
4 2,880,000 11,520,000
b Have to move house to new place
- 5,760,000 -
5.3.2 Acquiring more than 70% of total agricultural
land Per head
a Do not have to move house
1 5,760,000 5,760,000
b Have to move house to new place
- 11,520,000 -
5.4 Assistance for changing jobs and
employment VND/m
2 148 69,000 10,212,000
Item 1 (a); Article 18, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND of Thai Binh and
Article 22, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
5.5 Assist to fish pond, garden land VND/m2 192 2,250,000 432,000,000
Item 1 Article 17,
Decision16/2009/QĐ-UBND and
Item 1, Article 21, Decree
69/2009/NĐ-CP
5.6 Assist to agricultural land in residential area VND/m2 - 1,125,000 -
Item 2 Article 17, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Item 2,
Article 21, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
5.7 Assist to social VND/user 5 6,000,000 30,000,000 Proposal
103
No. Item Unit Qty Unit Cost Total Cost (VND) Notes
6 Thai Phuong
45,861,000
6.1 Moving within a Province VND/HH - 5,000,000 -
Article 14, Decision 16/2009/QĐ-
UBND of Thai Binh and Article 18,
Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
6.2 Assistance for renting house VND/HH - 4,200,000 -
Item 3, Article 14, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and item 3,
Article 18, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
6.3 Assistance for stabilizing the livelihood
Item 1(b); Article 16, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Article 20,
Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
6.3.1 Acquiring with from 10% to 30% and from
30% to70% of agricultural land Per head
a Do not have to move house
1 2,880,000 2,880,000
b Have to move house to new place
- 5,760,000 -
6.3.2 Acquiring more than 70% of total agricultural
land Per head
a Do not have to move house
- 5,760,000 -
b Have to move house to new place
- 11,520,000 -
6.4 Assistance for changing jobs and
employment VND/m
2 449 69,000 30,981,000
Item 1 (a); Article 18, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND of Thai Binh and
Article 22, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
6.5 Assist to fish pond, garden land VND/m2 - 2,000,000 -
Item 1 Article 17,
Decision16/2009/QĐ-UBND and
Item 1, Article 21, Decree
69/2009/NĐ-CP
6.6 Assist to agricultural land in residential area VND/m2 - 1,000,000 -
Item 2 Article 17, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Item 2,
Article 21, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
6.7 Assist to social VND/user 2 6,000,000 12,000,000 Proposal
104
No. Item Unit Qty Unit Cost Total Cost (VND) Notes
7 Hung Ha town
21,200,000
7.1 Moving within a Province VND/HH 1 5,000,000 5,000,000
Article 14, Decision 16/2009/QĐ-
UBND of Thai Binh and Article 18,
Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
7.2 Assistance for renting house VND/HH 1 4,200,000 4,200,000
Item 3, Article 14, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and item 3,
Article 18, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
7.3 Assistance for stabilizing the livelihood
-
Item 1(b); Article 16, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Article 20,
Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
7.3.1 Acquiring with from 10% to 30% and from
30% to70% of agricultural land Per head
a Do not have to move house
- 2,880,000 -
b Have to move house to new place
- 5,760,000 -
7.3.2 Acquiring more than 70% of total agricultural
land Per head
-
a Do not have to move house
- 5,760,000 -
b Have to move house to new place
- 11,520,000 -
7.4 Assistance for changing jobs and
employment VND/m
2 - 69,000 -
Item 1 (a); Article 18, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND of Thai Binh and
Article 22, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
7.5 Assist to fish pond, garden land VND/m2 - 5,500,000 -
Item 1 Article 17,
Decision16/2009/QĐ-UBND and
Item 1, Article 21, Decree
69/2009/NĐ-CP
7.6 Assist to agricultural land in residential area VND/m2 - 2,750,000 -
Item 2 Article 17, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Item 2,
Article 21, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
7.7 Assist to social VND/user 2 6,000,000 12,000,000 Proposal
105
No. Item Unit Qty Unit Cost Total Cost (VND) Notes
8 Minh Khai
107,309,000
8.1 Moving within a Province VND/HH 1 5,000,000 5,000,000
Article 14, Decision 16/2009/QĐ-
UBND of Thai Binh and Article 18,
Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
8.2 Assistance for renting house VND/HH 1 4,200,000 4,200,000
Item 3, Article 14, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and item 3,
Article 18, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
8.3 Assistance for stabilizing the livelihood
Item 1(b); Article 16, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Article 20,
Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
8.3.1 Acquiring with from 10% to 30% and from
30% to70% of agricultural land Per head
a Do not have to move house
3 2,880,000 8,640,000
b Have to move house to new place
- 5,760,000 -
8.3.2 Acquiring more than 70% of total agricultural
land Per head
a Do not have to move house
- 5,760,000 -
b Have to move house to new place
- 11,520,000 -
8.4 Assistance for changing jobs and
employment VND/m
2 601 69,000 41,469,000
Item 1 (a); Article 18, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND of Thai Binh and
Article 22, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
8.5 Assist to fish pond, garden land VND/m2 - 3,500,000 -
Item 1 Article 17,
Decision16/2009/QĐ-UBND and
Item 1, Article 21, Decree
69/2009/NĐ-CP
8.6 Assist to agricultural land in residential area VND/m2 - 1,750,000 -
Item 2 Article 17, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Item 2,
Article 21, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
8.7 Assist to social VND/user 8 6,000,000 48,000,000 Proposal
106
No. Item Unit Qty Unit Cost Total Cost (VND) Notes
9 Hong Linh
138,488,000
9.1 Moving within a Province VND/HH - 5,000,000 -
Article 14, Decision 16/2009/QĐ-
UBND of Thai Binh and Article 18,
Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
9.2 Assistance for renting house VND/HH - 4,200,000 -
Item 3, Article 14, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and item 3,
Article 18, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
9.3 Assistance for stabilizing the livelihood
Item 1(b); Article 16, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Article 20,
Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
9.3.1 Acquiring with from 10% to 30% and from
30% to70% of agricultural land Per head
a Do not have to move house
- 2,880,000 -
b Have to move house to new place
- 5,760,000 -
9.3.2 Acquiring more than 70% of total agricultural
land Per head
a Do not have to move house
- 5,760,000 -
b Have to move house to new place
- 11,520,000 -
9.4 Assistance for changing jobs and
employment VND/m
2 152 69,000 10,488,000
Item 1 (a); Article 18, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND of Thai Binh and
Article 22, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
9.5 Assist to fish pond, garden land VND/m2 61 2,000,000 122,000,000
Item 1 Article 17,
Decision16/2009/QĐ-UBND and
Item 1, Article 21, Decree
69/2009/NĐ-CP
9.6 Assist to agricultural land in residential area VND/m2 - 1,000,000 -
Item 2 Article 17, Decision
16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Item 2,
Article 21, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP
9.7 Assist to social VND/user 1 6,000,000 6,000,000 Proposal
Total
2,671,022,000
107
Table 35. 8: External monitoring cost
No. Item Unit Qty Unit cost
(VND) Cost (VND) Remark
I Remuneration for specialists
655,000,000
1 Team leader/Resettlement specialist man-
month 15 21,000,000 315,000,000 According to Decree 219 for Team leader
2 Community Development specialist man-
month 10 17,000,000 170,000,000
According to Decree 219 for specialist
having more than 10 experient years
3 Gender and ethnic minority specialist man-
month 10 17,000,000 170,000,000
According to Decree 219 for specialist
having more than 10 experient years
II Other costs
310,200,000
1 Perdiem
(6 months for each specialist) man-day 396 150,000 59,400,000 According to Decree 97
2 Travel cost (hiring car) km 9,000 13,000 117,000,000 Based on reality
3 Hotel cost night 396 300,000 118,800,000 According to Decree 97
4
Fees for organize the meetings with
compensation committees and interview
households
lump-sum
15,000,000
III Administrative cost
70,000,000
1 General activities (telephone, electricity,
water,...) month 15 4,000,000 60,000,000
2 Printing and punching document lump-sum 1 10,000,000 10,000,000 Based on reality
A Total of direct cost (I+II+III)
1,035,200,000
B VAT (10%)
103,520,000
C Contingency (10%)
113,872,000
Total A+B+C
1,252,592,000
108
Annex 1: The questionnaire for social and economic survey of affected assets
Vietnam Road Assets Management Program (VRAMP)
SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY AND AFFECTED ASSET FORM
Form VF05
Household code…………………. Survey date: ____ /__ /2013
Village………………Commune...........................District………….Province…………
A. HOUSEHOLDER INFORMATION
1. Full name of householder: ………………………………………; Age ……; Sex [ ]
Male=1; Female =2;
1.1 Ethnicity: [ ]; 1.2 Main occupation [ ]; 1.3 Secondary occupation [ ];
1.4 Education and occupation [ ];
1.6 Main monthly income of the householder: …………………………..……VND;
1.7 Classification of household : [ ] (1=Poor; 2= Near-poor; 3= Rise above poverty)
1.8 Policy family to enjoy social benefits: [ ]
(1=Single women householder; 2= Disabled persons; 3=The lonely aged; 4= Entitled to social
assistance; 5= Ethnic minorities)
1.9 The project affected area (a family may has land and property in different areas, if such, it needs
to mark clearly all affected areas of the household)
1) Within scope of road [ ]
2) Within safety corridor [ ]
3) Within viaduct, bridge [ ]
4) Within the scope of intersection [ ]
5) Other (please specify) [ ] _____________________
B. SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY IN AFFECTED AREA
2. Family members.
No. Full name
Sex Relation
with the
househo
lder 1=
Husband/Wif
e
2=
Father/Mothe
r
3=Son/daugh
ter
4= Son-in-
law/daughter-
in-law
5=Nephew/ni
ece
6=Other
brother/sister
Age
Ethnici
ty 1=Kinh
2= Thai
3= Tay 4= Nung
5= Muong
6=Hoa
7= Other
Main occupation 1= Agriculture (farming)
2= Livestock
3= Sales
4= Catering service,
5= Workers in factory,
workshop
6= State officials and state
employees
7= Work for private
companies
8= Work in transport field
9= Students, pupils
10= Housework
11= Hired worker
12=Other
Education 0= Illiterate
1= Primary school
2=Secondary school
3= High school
ungraduation
4= High school
5=Vocational
training
6= University and
above university
7= Others
Note
s
1=
Mal
e
2=
Fem
ale
1
109
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
3. Average annual income of household: ………………. ………… VND
Main sources of income contributed to the household's annual income:
1) Agricultural production (crops,
livestock)
Amount ________________________VND
2) Trade or business Amount ________________________VND
3) Salary Amount ________________________VND
4) From other sources (such as
remittances, etc.)
Amount ________________________VND
4. Average monthly expenditure of household
1) Average living expenditure of
household
Amount ________________________VND
2) Average healthcare of household Amount ________________________VND
3) Education spending Amount ________________________VND
4) Visit, tourism, relax Amount ________________________VND
5. The loan of household
Loans Loan amount
Loan-use purpose 1= Agricultural production
2= Business
3= Household expenditure
4= Building, repairing houses
5= Other (specify)
1) Loans from banks
2) Loans from other institutions
3) Loans from relatives, friends
4) Others
6. Please tell us the number of current assets and amenities your family is using?
Type of asset Number Type of asset Number Type of
asset Number Type of asset Number
1. Radio 4. bicycle 7.
Refrigerator 10. Gas Cooker
2. 5. Electric fans 8. Pump 11.Hot water
110
Tivi/Video tank
3. motorbike 6. Rice Cooker 9. Washing
machine 12. Computer
7. Water use: The daily main sources of water of household? (Marked x in the
appropriate box)
1) Digging well [ ] 2) Village public wells [ ]
3) Tap water [ ] 4) Rain water [ ]
5) Rivers, streams, ponds,
lakes
[ ] 6) Buying water [ ]
7) Ravine water [ ] 8) Other (specify) [ ]
8. Main energy for household lighting?
1) Power grid [ ] 4) Generator [ ]
2) Pin and battery [ ] 5) Oil lamp [ ]
3) Wood/charcoal [ ] 6) Others [ ]
9. Main energy for household cooking?
1) Power grid [ ] 5) Biogas [ ]
2) Generator [ ] 6) Others [ ]
3) Gas/oil [ ] 7) No answer [ ]
4) Wood/coal [ ]
10. Common diseases in the community (name of disease)
1) Cold [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
6) Dysentery [ ]
2) Influenza 7) Hepatitis [ ]
3) Respiratory disease 8) Toxicinfection [ ]
4) Malaria 9) Others [ ]
5) Cholera 10) No answer [ ]
11. Household‟s access to healthcare, education and culture services?
Healthcare, education and culture
services 1=Yes 2=No
Less than
1km 1= 1 - 2 km 2= 2 - 5 km
3= More
than 5 km
Healthcare
1. Commune health station
2. District hospital
3. Clinic/nurse
4. Pharmacy
5. Traditional drug treatment
Education
6. Preschool
7. Elementary school
8. Secondary school
9. High school
10.Vocational school
111
Cultural, religion
11. Market
12. Stadiums, sports
13. Pagoda/temple/church
14. Other amusement and
entertainment parks
12. Has the household economic condition changed in the recent 3 years?
1) No change [ ]; Reason: _________________________________________________
2) Better [ ]; Reason: _________________________________________________
3) Worse [ ]; Reason: _________________________________________________
13. Do you support the road upgrading and expansion project?
1) Yes [ ] 2) No [ ]
If yes, what‟s the support reason?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
If not, what do you wonder and worry about?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
If the project is implemented, what is positive side do you find?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
According to you, how is development of the road meaningful to the local socio-economic
development?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
14. How is the division of labor in your family?
No. Work-item Men Women Both
1 Main farming activities
1.1 - Soil tuning
1.2 - Cultivation
1.3 - Sowing
1.4 - Weeding
1.5 - Pesticide spraying
1.6 - Harvest
112
2 Vegetable growing
3 Livestock
4 Small business
5 Workers
6 Labor migration (domestic)
15. Community activities
Activity Male Female Both
1. Attend community meetings
2. Participate in decision making
3. Join local organizations
4. Others
C. INVENTORY OF LOSS IN AFFECTED AREAS
16. Land use status of household (affected land is only located in areas that needs to
acquire for the project)
Map
Type of soil
Total
land
area
(m2)
Affected degree
of each parcel
of land
Current
land
use
Legal status
of land
Work-
item
Type of
affect
1= Urban
residential land
2= Rural residential
land
3= Paddy land
4= Garden
5= Aquaculture
land
6= Business/non-
agricultural land
7= Forest land
8=Other type of
land
Total
affected
area (m2)
1= Partly
affected
2 =
Totally
affected
1= Owned
land
2= Rented
land
1= With red book
2= No red book
but legalable for
red book
3= illegalable for
red book
4= Rented land
5= Safety corridor
1=
Pavement
2= Safety
corridor
3 = Bridge
4 =
Intersection
5= Other
(specify)
1=
Permanently
2=
Temporary
Type
Plot?
Total
113
17. Houses affected by the project
Type of
house
Total
building
floor (m2 )
Using status
Affected level Work item
Typ
e of
affec
t 1. Villa
2. Level 1
3. Level 2
4. Level 3
5. Level 4
6.
Temporary
house
1. With construction
license
2. Without
construction license
3. Built on agricultural
land
4. Rented house
5. Built on Safety
corridor
1. Living
2. Renting
3. Living and
renting
4. Living and
trading
5. Trading
Total affected
floor
(m2)
1= Partly
affected
2 = Totally
affected
1= Pavement
2= Safety corridor
3 = Bridge
4 = Intersection
5= Other (specify)
1=
Perman
ently
2=
Tempo
rary
Note: A household may have many affected houses; it is necessary fill in the information of all affected
house.
18. Business impact (in the project area)
1) Business impact [ ] (1=No; 2= Yes, if yes, asked additional questions below)
a. Business location [ ] (1= In the same house; 2= Independent outside house)
b. Business form [ ] (1=Company; 2=Store; 3=Household)
c. Business registration [ ] (1= Yes; 2=No)
d. Type of business:…………………………………………………………..
e. Monthly income from business: _________________VND (Just ask those who business is
affected)
f. Impact locations in the project area: [ ] (1= Pavement; 2= Safety corridors; 3= Bridge; 4= Intersection; 5=
Others)
19. Affected works and other structures and living facilities on land
(Statistics of affected independent works outside houses and living facilities are listed above)
Works/living facilities
Type of works
(corresponding to auxiliary
works)
Unit Quantity
Work items
1= Pavement
2= Safety corridor
3 = Bridge
4 = Intersection
5= Other (specify)
1. Independent kitchen
outside main
1. Temporary
2. Equivalent to house level 4 m
2
2. Pigsty/beef/chicken coops 1. Temporary
2. Equivalent to house level 4 m
2
114
Works/living facilities
Type of works
(corresponding to auxiliary
works)
Unit Quantity
Work items
1= Pavement
2= Safety corridor
3 = Bridge
4 = Intersection
5= Other (specify)
3. Power meter Unit
4. Water meter Unit
5. Estimated water pipe
length m
6. Wired telephone Unit
7. Fence 1. Brick
2. Wood or barbed m
2
8. Gate
1. Wall
2. Steel
3. Wood/Bamboo
m2
9. Toilet, bathroom
(separate from house)
1. Brick, concrete
2. Bamboo/leaf m
2
10. Earth tomb
a) At the cemetery
b) Separate
Unit
11. Built tomb (brick,
cement)
c) At the cemetery
d) Separate
Unit
12. Well 1. Drilled
2. Dug m
13. Water tank
1. Brick/concrete
2. Stainless steel/Inox
3. Plastics
m3
14. Yard (only cement or
tiled) m
2
15. Fish pond (excavated
quantity) m
3
16. Other works (name of
115
Works/living facilities
Type of works
(corresponding to auxiliary
works)
Unit Quantity
Work items
1= Pavement
2= Safety corridor
3 = Bridge
4 = Intersection
5= Other (specify)
works and affected area)
20. Types of affected trees, crops
(Only make statistical of affected perennial/fruit)
Type of plants or agricultural
products Specifications Unit Quantity
Work items
1= Pavement
2= Safety corridor
3 = Bridge
4 = Intersection
5= Other (specify)
a) Fruit trees (main plant) Tree
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
b) Timber (main plant) Tree
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
c) Decoration plant (main
plant)
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
d) Crops main (plant) m2
1) Rice
2) Corn
116
Type of plants or agricultural
products Specifications Unit Quantity
Work items
1= Pavement
2= Safety corridor
3 = Bridge
4 = Intersection
5= Other (specify)
3) Potatoes
4) Peanut
5) Beans
6)
e) The area of seafood
aquaculture
m
2
117
D. CONSULTATION QUESTIONS
21. If your agricultural land or other productive land is affected (due to land acquisition),
which compensation plan does your family select?
a) Receive land-for-land (if replacement land in the commune is available) with the same type and
area/profitability [ ]
b) Receive cash [ ]
c) Not decide [ ]
22. For those whose residential land is affected only:
If it is unable to rebuild house on the remaining residential land (the remaining area is less than 80m2
for urban land and 100m2 for rural land, which resettlement plan does your family select?
a) Move to another land of the family [ ]
b) Move to another place where the family choose [ ]
c) Move to the project resettlement site [ ]
d) Move to resettlement site arranged by local authorities [ ]
e) Not decide [ ]
23. How does your family plan to use the land compensation money?
1) Rebuild or repair houses [ ]
2) Buy a new land [ ]
3) Buy other asset [ ] ; Name of asset ________________
4) Invest in small business [ ]
5) Save in a bank [ ]
6) Spend for children’s education [ ]
7) Other intention [ ]; Description ____________________
24. Choose a livelihood rehabilitation form of household.
1) Agricultural activity [ ] 3) Self-find job [ ]
2) Apprenticeship [ ] 4) No answer [ ]
Thank you for answering our questions.
Surveyor Householder or family
representative
118
Annex 2: Project Information Booklet (PIB)
VIET NAM ROAD ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (VRAMP)
PROJECT INFORMATION BOOKLET (PIB)
PROJECT OVERVIEW
Viet Nam Road Asset Management Program (VRAMP) has subprojects in 3 provinces of Hung
Yen, Hai Duong and Thai Binh, in scope of 10 districts/cities, towns, 33 wards/communes. The
initial investment cost is estimated at $ 121.6 million, of which the World Bank loan of $ 71.6
million, the Government's counterpart funds of $ 50 million. Ministry of Transport is the Executive
Agency (EA) of the project.
The objectives of the project: Establish a financial basis, sustainable institutional arrangements in
order to manage and upgrade the road system, develop for the economy in the North and Central regions of
Viet Nam. The project will have two main outputs:
The project will finance for maintaining the national roads no. 2, no.5, no.6, no. 18 and no.48;
upgrading for the national roads no. 38, no.39, no 39-1 and four bridges with the length of about 25
m of the road no. 38 B
(i) Maintenance roads with diversified contract forms to establish a mechanism for managing of
the maintenance of the Vietnam road system effectively and stable.
(ii) Upgrade and renovate the important national roads in the north region, including the
national road No.38, No.39, No. 39-1 and 9 bridges with length more than 25 meters on the national
roads (2 bridges on national road No.38, 4 bridges on national road No. 38B, two bridges on
national road No.39 and 1 bridge on national road No.39-2). Improve the institutional arrangements
of the road management agencies in Vietnam.
QUESTION 1: How will the VRAMP affect the local population?
Answer:
Positive impacts: The population in the project areas will benefit variously, including more
extensive access to irrigation system and water supply for farming production, reducing risk of crop
failure due to lack of water and more available water for irrigation.
Adverse impacts: It needs to acquire some land for the construction of the main canal and other
components. Every attempt will be made during the design process to minimize adverse impacts of
such land acquisition on households and communities.
Where land acquisition is necessary, those affected HHs will be fully compensated for their
affected land, houses, structures, crops and/or trees and be provided assistances for the restoration of
their living standards. Details are included in a Resettlement Plan which will be available at your
commune office.
119
QUESTION 2: What is the main objective of resettlement plan?
Answer: The main objective of the Resettlement Plan is to improve or at least to restore the
pre-project living standards and earning capacities of all PAHs.
QUESTION 3: What will happen if my land is affected by the project?
Answer:
(i) You will be offered Land-for-land of similar attributes and with secure tenure OR cash
compensation at replacement cost which is equivalent to current market price.
(ii) No compensation for rent land, but full replacement cost for investment on land to land user.
QUESTION 4: Do we need legal papers of land for being entitled to the compensation?
Answer:No, lack of formal legal rights of land does not prevent any APs from receiving
compensation, allowances and rehabilitation assistance. Land owners with land use right certificates
(LURCs) or in the process of acquiring LURC will be fully compensated for affected land and other
assets on land. Land users who have neither formal legal rights nor recognized claims to such land
will be compensated for assets on land only.
QUESTION 5: Are affected houses and structures compensated?
Answer:Yes. All affected houses and other structures as well as other fixed assets such as well,
breeding facilities, fences, etc. are compensated at replacement cost without depreciation nor
deduction for salvageable materials for the affected portion. This will ensure that the APs are able to
reconstruct houses/structures with better quality or at least with equivalent quality of the pre-project
houses/structures.
QUESTION 6: What about affected crops and trees?
Answer:
i) Affected crops, trees on permanently acquired land will be compensated with market value of the
crops at the time of compensation.
(ii) Compensation for crops, trees on temporary affected land:
- Annual crops will be based on the average production in the past 3 years for the temporary
acquisition duration.
- Compensation for trees equivalent to current market value given the type, age and productive
value (future production) at the time of compensation.
QUESTION 7: Besides the compensation, are there any assistances provided by the project?
Answer:In addition to compensation for loss of land and other assets according to the project
entitlements, the Project will provide rehabilitation assistance to eligible APs to improve or at least
to restore the pre-project living standards of all PAHs. Types of assistance for eligible APs include:
120
Severely affected households: Households who lose more than 20% of their total productive
landholdings will receive a rehabilitation package consisting of (i) a transition subsistence
allowance equivalent (ii) income restoration assistance such as agricultural extension
assistance to intensify use of remaining land, access to existing credit programs or project-
related employment.
Relocated households: Households who must relocate to new places will receive (i) transport
assistance, (ii) a transition subsistence allowance, (iii) house rent assistance based on market
price. The assistance rates are given in details in project entitlements.
Business owners who lose income in the transition period: Households with small,
unregistered businesses will be provided cash assistance equal to the provincial minimum
salary for 3 months. Owners of registered businesses will be provided cash assistance
equivalent to 30% of after tax income in one year based on average income in the last 3
consecutive years as certified by the tax department of the province.
Employees and hired labors who lose their jobs will be provided cash compensation for
monthly salary/wages for lost period in case of temporarily affected; or cash compensation
equivalent to the provincial minimum wage for six months or cash compensation for
remaining contract period whichever is higher in case of permanently affected.
Assistance for career change: For registered or non-registered businesses on their affected
residential land, APs at labor age will be provided free training courses at local vocational training
centre which are suitable for local conditions and capacities of APs.
QUESTION 8: Are all of local people entitled to lodgement of complaints about compensation?
Answer: No. Entitled APs are those who will lose land or property based on the detailed
measurement survey (DMS) that will be conducted following completion of the final designs for the
project. Affected communes and local competent agencies will be informed of the cut-off date of the
project.
QUESTION 9: If there are any disagreements or problems about land acquisition,
compensation or other general disputes during project implementation, are APs entitled to lodgment
of their complaints?
Answer:Yes, APs are entitled to lodgment of their complaints as grievance redress procedures
of the project.
Every complaint, query of APs about land acquisition, compensation, resettlement and
implementation will be resolved according to project policies and in time. APs do not have to pay
any fees for the complaint resolution.
QUESTION 10: How will APs be consulted and disseminated information about the project?
121
Answer:Public consultation meetings are organized at the commune to ensure that APs are
provided fully information about the project. APs will be disseminated information about the project
components, impacts, their entitlements, grievance redress mechanism, rights of participation and
consultation about resettlement activities. APs will participate in the RP preparation and
implementation and will be consulted about following issues: (a) participation in the RP preparation
as their interests; (b) consultation about vocational training which is suitable for their capacities, (c)
participation in other activities of the project if they are qualified.
QUESTION 11: As a resident in the project area, how can I help?
Answer:We would like you to participate in all consultation meetings and other activities
involving to the project in order to ensure that you are fully informed and consulted. Your
participation during the detailed measurement survey (DMS) and the implementation will help us
determine measures to mitigate impacts, to detect outstanding issues and potential problems and
then to identify immediate resolution of these problems.
QUESTION 12: How will you know if the objectives of this project are met?
Answer: PMU3 will carry out internal monitoring on all project activities. In addition, PMU3
will engage an independent monitoring agency to conduct external monitoring on resettlement
activities during the project implementation. The independent monitoring agency will submit a
report to PMU3 and WB on resettlement implementation progress every 6 months. A post-
resettlement impact evaluation will be studied to assess whether adverse impacts have been
mitigated adequately and the pre-project living standards of APs have been restored or not.
For further information and suggestions, please contact the Province Compensation, Assistance
and Resettlement Management Board, District Compensation, Assistance and Resettlement Boards
or Commune People’s Committee where you are living.
122
Annex 3: List of participants and pictures of consultation meetings
Table 36: Meetings with Other Stakeholder
No. Commune
Number
of
affected
HH
Meeting
Date Venue
No. of
participants
With
participation
of
No. of households
with the
questionnaires
Male Female IOL SES %
1 Hung Ha 582 347 192 155 367 204
1.1 Tan Le 56 A:
28/01
CPC
meeting
hall
24 16 8 26 17 30%
1.2 Hung Nhan
town 121
M:
27/01
CPC
meeting
hall
45 22 23 48 36 30%
1.3 Lien Hiep 8 M:
30/01
CPC
meeting
hall
8 7 1 8 8 100%
1.4 Phuc Khanh 186 M:
29/01
CPC
meeting
hall
102 58 44 115 63 34%
1.5 Thai
Phuong 52
A:
27/01
Commune
Temple 45 24 21 45 17 33%
1.6 Hung Ha
town 12
M:
30/01
Commune
Temple 12 8 4 12 6 50%
1.7 Hong Linh 22 A:
29/01
CPC
meeting
hall
14 6 8 16 8 36%
1.8 Minh Khai 95 A:
30/01
CPC
meeting
hall
74 31 43 74 40 42%
1.9 Tan Hoa 30 A:30/01
CPC
meeting
hall
23 20 3 23 9 30%
2 Dong Hung 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
2.1 Minh Tan
Total 582 - - 347 192 155 367 204
123
Table 37: Consultation on income restoration measures
# Name Address Position Interviewed
date
1 Nguyen Van Hoa Provincial People’s
Council Chairman 27/02/2013
2 Bui Thi Nga Farmer Association Deputy Chairman 27/02/2013
3 Khuc Thi Duyen Provincial Women
Union Chairwoman 27/02/2013
4 Truong Thi Hong Hanh Provincial Women
Union Deputy Chairwoman 27/02/2013
5 Mai Cong Tuan Vocational Training
College 19-BQP
Deputy Head of
consulting Department 27/02/2013
6 Nguyen Thi Thuy Women Union of
Hung Ha District Official 28/02/2013
7 Vu Quang Huy Farmer Association of
Hung Ha Standing Member 28/02/2013
8 Pham Ba Thuat
Vocational Training
Center of Hung Ha
district
Official 28/02/2013
9 Luong Thi Tiep Enterprise no.10
(Stock Company) Head of Department 28/02/2013
124
Table 38: Meetings for a rapid survey in the replacement values
# Name Address Title Meeting date
I At the Provincial level
1 Mai Thi Toan Financial
Department
Head of Public Assets
and Price Department 27/02/2013
2 Nguyễn Văn Thi Construction
Department
Head of Economic
Department 27/02/2013
II Hung Ha District level
1 Bui Duy Hạnh DPC Vice Chairman 17/01/2013
2 Bui Xuan Phong DPC Head Office 17/01/2013
3 Pham Thanh Nhon
Department of
Natural Resources
and Environment
Head of Department 17/01/2013
4 Pham Vinh Quang
Department of
Natural Resources
and Environment
Official 17/01/2013
5 Hoang Dinh Chinh Department of
Industry and Trade Head Department 17/01/2013
6 Nguyen Van Vinh
Department of
Planning and
Finance
Head Department 20/1/2013
7 Vu Huu Ai
Department of
Planning and
Finance
Deputy Head
Department 21/1/2013
8 Nguyen Thi Nen
Department of
Planning and
Finance
Accountant 23/1/2013
9 Hoang Van Thu Agricultural
Department
Deputy Head of
Department 26/1/2013
10 Thanh Phuong
Shop of
Construction
Materials
Shop Owner 29/01/2013
11 Hanh Luc
Shop of
Construction
Materials
Shop Owner 29/01/2013
III At the Commune level
1 Tran Cong Ly Tan Le Commune Vice Chairman 28/01/2013
2 Tran Ba Hoi Tan Le Commune Land Manager 28/01/2013
125
# Name Address Title Meeting date
3 Nguyen Van Cot Tan Le Commune Bui Xa Village Leader 28/01/2013
4 Hoang Thi Chai Tan Le Commune Chieu Thanh Village
Leader 28/01/2013
5 Tran Khac Lap Tan Le Commune Local Citizen 28/01/2013
6 Tran Ngoc Dai Tan Le Commune Local Citizen 28/01/2013
7 Tran Khac Dien Tan Le Commune Local Citizen 28/01/2013
8 Do Van Huyen Hung Nhan Town Deputy Chairman of
Commune 27/01/2013
9 Nguyen Chi Cong Hung Nhan Town Land Manager 27/01/2013
10 Nguyen Van Dinh Hung Nhan Town Dau Village Leader 27/01/2013
11 Thai Xuan Phong Hung Nhan Town Van Nam Village Leader 27/01/2013
12 Tran Thi Hue Hung Nhan Town Local Citizen 27/01/2013
13 To Duc Hung Hung Nhan Town Local Citizen 27/01/2013
14 Pham Van Dung Hung Nhan Town Local Citizen 27/01/2013
15 Nguyen Huu Tuyen Tan Hoa Commune Chairman of Commune 30/01/2013
16 Dao Quang Nghia Tan Hoa Commune Land Manager 30/01/2013
17 Nguyen Van Luan Tan Hoa Commune Luong Village Leader 30/01/2013
18 Truong Van Hieu Tan Hoa Commune Local Citizen 30/01/2013
19 Le Minh Phong Tan Hoa Commune Local Citizen 30/01/2013
20 Nguyen Thi Chung Tan Hoa Commune Local Citizen 30/01/2013
21 Dao Trong Giap Lien Hiep
Commune Chairman of Commune 29/01/2013
22 Tran Van Mung Lien Hiep
Commune Nai Village Leader 29/01/2013
23 Dao Van Voc Lien Hiep
Commune Nai Village Leader 29/01/2013
24 Dong Quang Binh Lien Hiep
Commune Bai Village Leader 29/01/2013
25 Nguyen Van Hoa Lien Hiep
Commune Local Citizen 29/01/2013
26 Nguyen Xuan Hung Lien Hiep
Commune Local Citizen 29/01/2013
27 Nguyen Xuan Hai Lien Hiep
Commune Local Citizen 29/01/2013
28 Bui Trong Don Phuc Khanh Chairman 27/01/2013
126
# Name Address Title Meeting date
Commune
29 Nguyen Van Tho Phuc Khanh
Commune Land Manager 27/01/2013
30 Tran Dinh Tot Phuc Khanh
Commune
Khanh My Village
Leader 27/01/2013
31 To Tien Thung Phuc Khanh
Commune
Huong Xa Village
Leader 27/01/2013
32 Nguyen Van Cho Phuc Khanh
Commune Local Citizen 27/01/2013
33 Tran Duy Ngan Phuc Khanh
Commune Local Citizen 27/01/2013
34 Nguyen Van Chinh Phuc Khanh
Commune Local Citizen 27/01/2013
35 Nguyen Van Chung Thai Phuong
Commune Chairman of Commune 30/01/2013
36 Tran Van Sang Thai Phuong
Commune Land Manager 30/01/2013
37 Nguyen Duy Bich Thai Phuong
Commune Nhan Xa Village Leader 30/01/2013
38 Hoang Van Tuong Thai Phuong
Commune Local Citizen 30/01/2013
39 Tran Van Dien Thai Phuong
Commune Local Citizen 30/01/2013
40 Tran Huu Thuoc Thai Phuong
Commune Local Citizen 30/01/2013
41 Nguyen Huu Huan Hung Ha Town Chairman of Commune 29/01/2013
42 Ngo Quoc Vu Hung Ha Town Land Manager 29/01/2013
43 Nguyen Manh Hung Hung Ha Town Nhan Cau 1 Village
Leader 29/01/2013
44 Nghiem Đinh Khoi Hung Ha Town Dong Tu 1 Village
Leader 29/01/2013
45 Nguyen Duy Hung Hung Ha Town Dong Tu 2 Village
Leader 29/01/2013
46 Nguyen Huu De Hung Ha Town Thi Doc Village Leader 29/01/2013
47 Nguyen Minh Duc Minh Khai
Commune Chairman of Commune 30/01/2013
127
# Name Address Title Meeting date
48 Hoang Ngoc Son Minh Khai
Commune Land Manager 30/01/2013
49 Nguyen Huu Man Minh Khai
Commune
Dong Lac Village
Leader 30/01/2013
50 Vu Trung Kien Minh Khai
Commune
Thanh Cach Village
Leader 30/01/2013
51 Tran Van Quan Minh Khai
Commune Local Citizen 30/01/2013
52 Tran Van Hai Minh Khai
Commune Local Citizen 30/01/2013
53 Tran Cong Thanh Minh Khai
Commune Local Citizen 30/01/2013
54 Nguyen Duc Luy Hong Linh
Commune Chairman of Commune 30/01/2013
55 Nguyen Ngoc An Hong Linh
Commune Land Manager 30/01/2013
56 Pham Van Thap Hong Linh
Commune Vu Dong Village Leader 30/01/2013
57 Nguyen Dinh Chieu Hong Linh
Commune
Dong Han Land
Manager 30/01/2013
58 Nguyen Viet Ba Hong Linh
Commune Village Leader 30/01/2013
59 Pham Van Bo Hong Linh
Commune Local Citizen 30/01/2013
60 Nguyen Van Canh Hong Linh
Commune Local Citizen 30/01/2013
129
Annex 4: Detailed results survey on the substitution cost in each commune
Table 4.1: Comments from interviewees in Tan Le commune about the comparison between
unit costs enacted by Thai Binh PPC and the replacement values
Properties
Same as
replacement
costs
Higher than
replacement
costs
Lower than
replacement
costs
% of PPC costs
lower than
replacement costs
Residential land x 60% - 80%
Agricultural land x 10% - 15%
Non-agricultural land x 50% - 75%
Houses and architectural works x 10% - 15%
Fruit and timber trees x 08% - 15%
Annual rice and crops x 10% - 15%
Table 4.2: The results of replacement costs surveyed in Tan Le commune, Hung Ha district
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
1 Land Decision No.3152/QD-UBND, dated 29/12/2012 by Thai
Binh Provincial People‟s Committee
1.1 Residential land
1.1.1 Place on the main surface of
roads. VND/m2 1,500,000 4,000,000 2.67
1.1.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 400,000 1,000,000 2.50
1.1.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 300,000 700,000 2.33
1.2 Commercial land, non-
agricultural business
1.2.1 Place on the main surface of
roads. VND/m2 750,000 1,500,000 2.00
1.2.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 200,000 500,000 2.50
1.2.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 200,000 500,000 2.50
1.3 Agriculture land
1.3.1 Annual crop Land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10
1.3.2 Perennial Tree Land VND/m2 45,000 50,000 1.11
1.3.3 Aquaculture land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10
130
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
2 Houses, Substructures
Decision No.03/2013/QD-UBND dated 25/02/2013 by Thai
Binh Provincial People‟s Committee refer to Adjustment
the factor of compensation unit prices of construction
works issued Decision No.01/2010/QD-UBND dated
25/01/2010 by Thai Binh Provincial People's Committee
with K = 1.74
2.1 House with 1 floor, high walls
≥ 3m
2.1.1
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 110 with
columns, wooden structures,
roofing tile 22 pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,280,842 2,500,000 1.10
2.1.2
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 220, wooden
structures, roofing tile 22
pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,450,334 2,700,000 1.10
2.1.3
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 110 with
columns, flat roof.
m2 floor 1,594,506 1,700,000 1.07
2.1.4
House made from non-holes
brick, flat roof, wall 220,
without reinforced foundation
and without easements.
m2 floor 1,891,770 2,100,000 1.11
2.1.5
House made from non-holes
brick, flat roof, wall 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles, without easements.
m2 floor 2,126,446 2,300,000 1.08
2.2 House with 2 floors, flat roof
2.2.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
without reinforced foundation
and without easements.
m2 floor 2,937,959 3,600,000 1.23
2.2.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles, without easements
m2 floor 2,853,160 3,500,000 1.23
131
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
2.3 House with 3 floors, flat roof,
easements inside house.
2.3.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles.
m2 floor 3,240,243 4,000,000 1.23
2.3.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
m2 floor 3,278,567 4,000,000 1.22
2.3.3
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
m2 floor 3,401,368 4,200,000 1.23
2.3.4
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
m2 floor 3,128,660 3,900,000 1.25
2.3.5
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
m2 floor 3,251,462 4,000,000 1.23
2.4 House with 4 floors, flat roof,
easements inside house.
2.4.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
VND/m2
floor 3,372,996 4,200,000 1.25
2.4.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
VND/m2
floor 3,458,191 4,300,000 1.24
2.4.3
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
VND/m2
floor 3,119,476 3,900,000 1.25
132
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
2.4.4
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
VND/m2
floor 3,193,759 3,900,000 1.22
2.5 Additional house with high
walls < 3m -
2.5.1
House made from slag brick,
bamboo structure, fibro cement
tiled roof.
m2 floor 1,003,318 1,200,000 1.20
2.5.2
House made from slag brick,
wooden structure, roofing tile
22 pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,048,017 2,500,000 1.22
2.5.3
House made from slag brick,
steel structure, metal sheet roof
covering.
m2 floor 1,471,836 1,800,000 1.22
3 Other works
3.1 Tank
3.1.1 Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 4m3 VND/m3 1,209,735 1,500,000 1.24
3.1.2
Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, with
concrete slab.
VND/m3 1,039,650 1,200,000 1.15
3.1.3
Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, without
concrete slab
VND/m3 637,710 800,000 1.25
3.2 Yard
3.2.1 Broken brick concrete yard,
smoothed with cement, sand. VND/m2 100,920 126,000 1.25
3.2.2 Oblong brick-paved yard VND/m2 168,780 210,000 1.24
3.2.3 Tile yard VND/m2 170,520 210,000 1.23
3.3 Toilet outside house
3.3.1
Septic toilet (excluding doors
and toilet facilities that will be
detailed measurement multiply
by the unit price at the time of
survey)
VND/m2 6,946,451 8,600,000 1.24
3.3.2
No septic toilet (excluding
doors and toilet facilities that
will be detailed measurement
multiply by the unit price at the
time of survey)
VND/m2 6,778,057 8,400,000 1.24
3.4 Fence
133
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
3.4.1 Lattice fence B40 m2 25,000 30,000 1.20
3.4.2 Barbed wire fence 20x20 m2 55,000 65,000 1.18
4 Trees, crops
Diameter
of leaf
canopy:
2-3 m
4.1 Litchi tree VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18
4.2 Longan, litchi tree (diameter
20-25cm) VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18
4.3 Grapefruit tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.4 Orange tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17
4.5 Tangerine tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17
4.6 Kumquat tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10
4.7 Peach, Plum, Apricot (fruit tree) VND/tree 50,000 60,000 1.20
4.8 Mulberry tree VND/tree 180,000 210,000 1.17
4.9 Mango tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.10 “Na” tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.11 Egg tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10
4.12 Peach tree VND/tree 15,000 18,000 1.20
4.13 “Xanh”, “Si” tree (leaf canopy) VND/tree 10,000 12,000 1.20
4.14 “Đa”, “Si”, “Sung” VND/tree 70,000 80,000 1.14 Diameter
of root:
8-15 cm 4.15 “Xanh”, “Loc vung” VND/tree 80,000 95,000 1.19
4.16 Young rice field VND/m2 2,500 3,000 1.20
4.17 Developing rice field VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
4.18 Complete ploughed, raked field VND/m2 500 600 1.20
4.19 Galangal, ginger, lemongrass,
turmeric VND/m2 7,000 8,000 1.14
4.20 Sweet potato (by bed) VND/m2 1,700 2,000 1.18
4.21 Sweet potato (by cutting) VND/m2 500 600 1.20
4.22 Water morning glory, water-
taro, Indian taro VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
4.23 Cabbage, kohlrabi VND/m2 3,000 4,000 1.33
4.24 Herbs VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20
4.25 Beans, peanut, corn, potato VND/m2 4,500 5,000 1.11
4.26 Water melon, cucumber, tomato VND/m2 3,800 4,000 1.05
4.27 Flowers crop VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20
4.28 “Gac”, Loopah, Pumpkin,
Gourd frame VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
134
Table 4.3: Comments from interviewees in Hung Nhan town about the comparison between
unit costs enacted by Thai Binh PPC and the replacement values
Properties
Same as
replacement
costs
Higher than
replacement
costs
Lower than
replacement
costs
% of PPC costs
lower than
replacement costs
Residential land x 20% - 70%
Agricultural land x 15% - 20%
Non-agricultural land x 20% - 25%
Houses and architectural works x 10% - 15%
Fruit and timber trees x 10% - 15%
Annual rice and crops x 10% - 15%
Table 4.4: The results of replacement costs surveyed in Hung Nhan town, Hung Ha district
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
1 Land Decision No.3152/QD-UBND, dated 29/12/2012 by Thai
Binh Provincial People‟s Committee
1.1 Residential land
1.1.1 Place on the main surface of
roads. VND/m2 5,000,000 7,000,000 1.40
1.1.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 600,000 1,500,000 2.50
1.1.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 350,000 700,000 2.00
1.2 Commercial land, non-
agricultural business
1.2.1 Place on the main surface of
roads. VND/m2 2,500,000 3,500,000 1.40
1.2.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 300,000 450,000 1.50
1.2.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 200,000 300,000 1.50
1.3 Agriculture land
1.3.1 Annual crop Land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10
1.3.2 Perennial Tree Land VND/m2 45,000 50,000 1.11
1.3.3 Aquaculture land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10
135
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
2 Houses, Substructures
Decision No.03/2013/QD-UBND dated 25/02/2013 by Thai
Binh Provincial People‟s Committee refer to Adjustment
the factor of compensation unit prices of construction
works issued Decision No.01/2010/QD-UBND dated
25/01/2010 by Thai Binh Provincial People's Committee
with K = 1.74
2.1 House with 1 floor, high walls
≥ 3m
2.1.1
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 110 with
columns, wooden structures,
roofing tile 22 pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,280,842 2,500,000 1.10
2.1.2
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 220, wooden
structures, roofing tile 22
pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,450,334 2,700,000 1.10
2.1.3
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 110 with
columns, flat roof.
m2 floor 1,594,506 1,700,000 1.07
2.1.4
House made from non-holes
brick, flat roof, wall 220,
without reinforced foundation
and without easements.
m2 floor 1,891,770 2,100,000 1.11
2.1.5
House made from non-holes
brick, flat roof, wall 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles, without easements.
m2 floor 2,126,446 2,300,000 1.08
2.2 House with 2 floors, flat roof
2.2.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
without reinforced foundation
and without easements.
m2 floor 2,937,959 3,600,000 1.23
2.2.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles, without easements
m2 floor 2,853,160 3,500,000 1.23
2.3 House with 3 floors, flat roof,
easements inside house. -
2.3.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles.
m2 floor 3,240,243 4,000,000 1.23
136
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
2.3.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
m2 floor 3,278,567 4,000,000 1.22
2.3.3
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
m2 floor 3,401,368 4,200,000 1.23
2.3.4
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
m2 floor 3,128,660 3,900,000 1.25
2.3.5
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
m2 floor 3,251,462 4,000,000 1.23
2.4 House with 4 floors, flat roof,
easements inside house.
2.4.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
VND/m2
floor 3,372,996 4,200,000 1.25
2.4.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
VND/m2
floor 3,458,191 4,300,000 1.24
2.4.3
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
VND/m2
floor 3,119,476 3,900,000 1.25
2.4.4
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
VND/m2
floor 3,193,759 3,900,000 1.22
2.5 Additional house with high
walls < 3m -
2.5.1
House made from slag brick,
bamboo structure, fibro cement
tiled roof.
m2 floor 1,003,318 1,200,000 1.20
137
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
2.5.2
House made from slag brick,
wooden structure, roofing tile
22 pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,048,017 2,500,000 1.22
2.5.3
House made from slag brick,
steel structure, metal sheet roof
covering.
m2 floor 1,471,836 1,800,000 1.22
3 Other works
3.1 Tank
3.1.1 Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 4m3 VND/m3 1,209,735 1,500,000 1.24
3.1.2
Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, with
concrete slab.
VND/m3 1,039,650 1,200,000 1.15
3.1.3
Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, without
concrete slab
VND/m3 637,710 800,000 1.25
3.2 Yard
3.2.1 Broken brick concrete yard,
smoothed with cement, sand. VND/m2 100,920 126,000 1.25
3.2.2 Oblong brick-paved yard VND/m2 168,780 210,000 1.24
3.2.3 Tile yard VND/m2 170,520 210,000 1.23
3.3 Toilet outside house
3.3.1
Septic toilet (excluding doors
and toilet facilities that will be
detailed measurement multiply
by the unit price at the time of
survey)
VND/m2 6,946,451 8,600,000 1.24
3.3.2
No septic toilet (excluding
doors and toilet facilities that
will be detailed measurement
multiply by the unit price at the
time of survey)
VND/m2 6,778,057 8,400,000 1.24
3.4 Fence
3.4.1 Lattice fence B40 m2 25,000 30,000 1.20
3.4.2 Barbed wire fence 20x20 m2 55,000 65,000 1.18
4 Trees, crops
Diameter
of leaf 4.1 Litchi tree VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18
138
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
4.2 Longan, litchi tree (diameter 20-
25cm) VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18
canopy:
2-3 m
4.3 Grapefruit tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.4 Orange tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17
4.5 Tangerine tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17
4.6 Kumquat tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10
4.7 Peach, Plum, Apricot (fruit tree) VND/tree 50,000 60,000 1.20
4.8 Mulberry tree VND/tree 180,000 210,000 1.17
4.9 Mango tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.10 “Na” tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.11 Egg tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10
4.12 Peach tree VND/tree 15,000 18,000 1.20
4.13 “Xanh”, “Si” tree (leaf canopy) VND/tree 10,000 12,000 1.20
4.14 “Đa”, “Si”, “Sung” VND/tree 70,000 80,000 1.14 Diameter
of root:
8-15 cm 4.15 “Xanh”, “Loc vung” VND/tree 80,000 95,000 1.19
4.16 Young rice field VND/m2 2,500 3,000 1.20
4.17 Developing rice field VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
4.18 Complete ploughed, raked field VND/m2 500 600 1.20
4.19 Galangal, ginger, lemongrass,
turmeric VND/m2 7,000 8,000 1.14
4.20 Sweet potato (by bed) VND/m2 1,700 2,000 1.18
4.21 Sweet potato (by cutting) VND/m2 500 600 1.20
4.22 Water morning glory, water-
taro, Indian taro VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
4.23 Cabbage, kohlrabi VND/m2 3,000 4,000 1.33
4.24 Herbs VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20
4.25 Beans, peanut, corn, potato VND/m2 4,500 5,000 1.11
4.26 Water melon, cucumber, tomato VND/m2 3,800 4,000 1.05
4.27 Flowers crop VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20
4.28 “Gac”, Loopah, Pumpkin,
Gourd frame VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
139
Table 4.5: Comments from interviewees in Tan Hoa commune about the comparison between
unit costs enacted by Thai Binh PPC and the replacement values
Properties
Same as
replacement
costs
Higher than
replacement
costs
Lower than
replacement
costs
% of PPC costs
lower than
replacement costs
Residential land x 70% - 100%
Agricultural land x 10% - 20%
Non-agricultural land x 60% - 70%
Houses and architectural works x 10% - 15%
Fruit and timber trees x 10% - 15%
Annual rice and crops x 10% - 15%
Table 4.6: The results of replacement costs surveyed in Tan Hoa commune, Hung Ha district
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(%)
Remarks
1 Land Decision No.3152/QD-UBND, dated 29/12/2012 by Thai
Binh Provincial People‟s Committee
1.1 Residential land
1.1.1 Place on the main surface of
roads. VND/m2 800,000 3,000,000 3.75
1.1.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 400,000 1,000,000 2.50
1.1.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 200,000 500,000 2.50
1.2 Commercial land, non-
agricultural business
1.2.1 Place on the main surface of
roads. VND/m2 400,000 1,000,000 2.50
1.2.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 200,000 500,000 2.50
1.2.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 200,000 500,000 2.50
1.3 Agriculture land
1.3.1 Annual crop Land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10
1.3.2 Perennial Tree Land VND/m2 45,000 50,000 1.11
1.3.3 Aquaculture land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10
140
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(%)
Remarks
2 Houses, Substructures
Decision No.03/2013/QD-UBND dated 25/02/2013 by Thai
Binh Provincial People‟s Committee refer to Adjustment
the factor of compensation unit prices of construction
works issued Decision No.01/2010/QD-UBND dated
25/01/2010 by Thai Binh Provincial People's Committee
with K = 1.74
2.1 House with 1 floor, high walls
≥ 3m
2.1.1
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 110 with
columns, wooden structures,
roofing tile 22 pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,280,842 2,500,000 1.10
2.1.2
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 220, wooden
structures, roofing tile 22
pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,450,334 2,700,000 1.10
2.1.3
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 110 with
columns, flat roof.
m2 floor 1,594,506 1,700,000 1.07
2.1.4
House made from non-holes
brick, flat roof, wall 220,
without reinforced foundation
and without easements.
m2 floor 1,891,770 2,100,000 1.11
2.1.5
House made from non-holes
brick, flat roof, wall 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles, without easements.
m2 floor 2,126,446 2,300,000 1.08
2.2 House with 2 floors, flat roof
2.2.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
without reinforced foundation
and without easements.
m2 floor 2,937,959 3,600,000 1.23
2.2.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles, without easements
m2 floor 2,853,160 3,500,000 1.23
2.3 House with 3 floors, flat roof,
easements inside house. -
2.3.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles.
m2 floor 3,240,243 4,000,000 1.23
141
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(%)
Remarks
2.3.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
m2 floor 3,278,567 4,000,000 1.22
2.3.3
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
m2 floor 3,401,368 4,200,000 1.23
2.3.4
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
m2 floor 3,128,660 3,900,000 1.25
2.3.5
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
m2 floor 3,251,462 4,000,000 1.23
2.4 House with 4 floors, flat roof,
easements inside house.
2.4.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
VND/m2
floor 3,372,996 4,200,000 1.25
2.4.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
VND/m2
floor 3,458,191 4,300,000 1.24
2.4.3
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
VND/m2
floor 3,119,476 3,900,000 1.25
2.4.4
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
VND/m2
floor 3,193,759 3,900,000 1.22
2.5 Additional house with high
walls < 3m -
2.5.1
House made from slag brick,
bamboo structure, fibro cement
tiled roof.
m2 floor 1,003,318 1,200,000 1.20
142
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(%)
Remarks
2.5.2
House made from slag brick,
wooden structure, roofing tile
22 pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,048,017 2,500,000 1.22
2.5.3
House made from slag brick,
steel structure, metal sheet roof
covering.
m2 floor 1,471,836 1,800,000 1.22
3 Other works
3.1 Tank
3.1.1 Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 4m3 VND/m3 1,209,735 1,500,000 1.24
3.1.2
Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, with
concrete slab.
VND/m3 1,039,650 1,200,000 1.15
3.1.3
Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, without
concrete slab
VND/m3 637,710 800,000 1.25
3.2 Yard
3.2.1 Broken brick concrete yard,
smoothed with cement, sand. VND/m2 100,920 126,000 1.25
3.2.2 Oblong brick-paved yard VND/m2 168,780 210,000 1.24
3.2.3 Tile yard VND/m2 170,520 210,000 1.23
3.3 Toilet outside house
3.3.1
Septic toilet (excluding doors
and toilet facilities that will be
detailed measurement multiply
by the unit price at the time of
survey)
VND/m2 6,946,451 8,600,000 1.24
3.3.2
No septic toilet (excluding
doors and toilet facilities that
will be detailed measurement
multiply by the unit price at the
time of survey)
VND/m2 6,778,057 8,400,000 1.24
3.4 Fence
3.4.1 Lattice fence B40 m2 25,000 30,000 1.20
3.4.2 Barbed wire fence 20x20 m2 55,000 65,000 1.18
4 Trees, crops
Diameter
143
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(%)
Remarks
4.1 Litchi tree VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18 of leaf
canopy:
2-3 m 4.2 Longan, litchi tree (diameter
20-25cm) VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18
4.3 Grapefruit tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.4 Orange tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17
4.5 Tangerine tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17
4.6 Kumquat tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10
4.7 Peach, Plum, Apricot (fruit tree) VND/tree 50,000 60,000 1.20
4.8 Mulberry tree VND/tree 180,000 210,000 1.17
4.9 Mango tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.10 “Na” tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.11 Egg tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10
4.12 Peach tree VND/tree 15,000 18,000 1.20
4.13 “Xanh”, “Si” tree (leaf canopy) VND/tree 10,000 12,000 1.20
4.14 “Đa”, “Si”, “Sung” VND/tree 70,000 80,000 1.14 Diameter
of root:
8-15 cm 4.15 “Xanh”, “Loc vung” VND/tree 80,000 95,000 1.19
4.16 Young rice field VND/m2 2,500 3,000 1.20
4.17 Developing rice field VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
4.18 Complete ploughed, raked field VND/m2 500 600 1.20
4.19 Galangal, ginger, lemongrass,
turmeric VND/m2 7,000 8,000 1.14
4.20 Sweet potato (by bed) VND/m2 1,700 2,000 1.18
4.21 Sweet potato (by cutting) VND/m2 500 600 1.20
4.22 Water morning glory, water-
taro, Indian taro VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
4.23 Cabbage, kohlrabi VND/m2 3,000 4,000 1.33
4.24 Herbs VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20
4.25 Beans, peanut, corn, potato VND/m2 4,500 5,000 1.11
4.26 Water melon, cucumber, tomato VND/m2 3,800 4,000 1.05
4.27 Flowers crop VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20
4.28 “Gac”, Loopah, Pumpkin,
Gourd frame VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
144
Table 4.7: Comments from interviewees in Lien Hiep commune about the comparison between
unit costs enacted by Thai Binh PPC and the replacement values
Properties
Same as
replacement
costs
Higher than
replacement
costs
Lower than
replacement
costs
% of PPC costs
lower than
replacement costs
Residential land x 75% - 120%
Agricultural land x 10% - 20%
Non-agricultural land x 70% - 90%
Houses and architectural works x 10% - 15%
Fruit and timber trees x 10% - 20%
Annual rice and crops x 10% - 15%
Table 4.8: The results of replacement costs surveyed in Lien Hiep commune, Hung Ha district
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(%)
Remarks
1 Land Decision No.3152/QD-UBND, dated 29/12/2012 by Thai
Binh Provincial People‟s Committee
1.1 Residential land
1.1.1 Place on the main surface of
roads. VND/m2 700,000 3,000,000 4.29
1.1.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 400,000 1,000,000 2.50
1.1.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 300,000 1,000,000 3.33
1.2 Commercial land, non-
agricultural business
1.2.1 Place on the main surface of
roads. VND/m2 350,000 1,000,000 2.86
1.2.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 200,000 500,000 2.50
1.2.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 200,000 500,000 2.50
1.3 Agriculture land
1.3.1 Annual crop Land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10
1.3.2 Perennial Tree Land VND/m2 45,000 50,000 1.11
1.3.3 Aquaculture land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10
145
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(%)
Remarks
2 Houses, Substructures
Decision No.03/2013/QD-UBND dated 25/02/2013 by Thai
Binh Provincial People‟s Committee refer to Adjustment
the factor of compensation unit prices of construction
works issued Decision No.01/2010/QD-UBND dated
25/01/2010 by Thai Binh Provincial People's Committee
with K = 1.74
2.1 House with 1 floor, high walls
≥ 3m
2.1.1
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 110 with
columns, wooden structures,
roofing tile 22 pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,280,842 2,500,000 1.10
2.1.2
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 220, wooden
structures, roofing tile 22
pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,450,334 2,700,000 1.10
2.1.3
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 110 with
columns, flat roof.
m2 floor 1,594,506 1,700,000 1.07
2.1.4
House made from non-holes
brick, flat roof, wall 220,
without reinforced foundation
and without easements.
m2 floor 1,891,770 2,100,000 1.11
2.1.5
House made from non-holes
brick, flat roof, wall 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles, without easements.
m2 floor 2,126,446 2,300,000 1.08
2.2 House with 2 floors, flat roof
2.2.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
without reinforced foundation
and without easements.
m2 floor 2,937,959 3,600,000 1.23
146
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(%)
Remarks
2.2.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles, without easements
m2 floor 2,853,160 3,500,000 1.23
2.3 House with 3 floors, flat roof,
easements inside house. -
2.3.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles.
m2 floor 3,240,243 4,000,000 1.23
2.3.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
m2 floor 3,278,567 4,000,000 1.22
2.3.3
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
m2 floor 3,401,368 4,200,000 1.23
2.3.4
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
m2 floor 3,128,660 3,900,000 1.25
2.3.5
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
m2 floor 3,251,462 4,000,000 1.23
2.4 House with 4 floors, flat roof,
easements inside house.
2.4.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
VND/m2
floor 3,372,996 4,200,000 1.25
147
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(%)
Remarks
2.4.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
VND/m2
floor 3,458,191 4,300,000 1.24
2.4.3
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
VND/m2
floor 3,119,476 3,900,000 1.25
2.4.4
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
VND/m2
floor 3,193,759 3,900,000 1.22
2.5 Additional house with high
walls < 3m -
2.5.1
House made from slag brick,
bamboo structure, fibro cement
tiled roof.
m2 floor 1,003,318 1,200,000 1.20
2.5.2
House made from slag brick,
wooden structure, roofing tile
22 pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,048,017 2,500,000 1.22
2.5.3
House made from slag brick,
steel structure, metal sheet roof
covering.
m2 floor 1,471,836 1,800,000 1.22
3 Other works
3.1 Tank
3.1.1 Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 4m3 VND/m3 1,209,735 1,500,000 1.24
3.1.2
Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, with
concrete slab.
VND/m3 1,039,650 1,200,000 1.15
3.1.3
Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, without
concrete slab
VND/m3 637,710 800,000 1.25
148
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(%)
Remarks
3.2 Yard
3.2.1 Broken brick concrete yard,
smoothed with cement, sand. VND/m2 100,920 126,000 1.25
3.2.2 Oblong brick-paved yard VND/m2 168,780 210,000 1.24
3.2.3 Tile yard VND/m2 170,520 210,000 1.23
3.3 Toilet outside house
3.3.1
Septic toilet (excluding doors
and toilet facilities that will be
detailed measurement multiply
by the unit price at the time of
survey)
VND/m2 6,946,451 8,600,000 1.24
3.3.2
No septic toilet (excluding
doors and toilet facilities that
will be detailed measurement
multiply by the unit price at the
time of survey)
VND/m2 6,778,057 8,400,000 1.24
3.4 Fence
3.4.1 Lattice fence B40 m2 25,000 30,000 1.20
3.4.2 Barbed wire fence 20x20 m2 55,000 65,000 1.18
4 Trees, crops
Diameter
of leaf
canopy:
2-3 m
4.1 Litchi tree VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18
4.2 Longan, litchi tree (diameter
20-25cm) VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18
4.3 Grapefruit tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.4 Orange tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17
4.5 Tangerine tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17
4.6 Kumquat tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10
4.7 Peach, Plum, Apricot (fruit tree) VND/tree 50,000 60,000 1.20
4.8 Mulberry tree VND/tree 180,000 210,000 1.17
149
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(%)
Remarks
4.9 Mango tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.10 “Na” tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.11 Egg tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10
4.12 Peach tree VND/tree 15,000 18,000 1.20
4.13 “Xanh”, “Si” tree (leaf canopy) VND/tree 10,000 12,000 1.20
4.14 “Đa”, “Si”, “Sung” VND/tree 70,000 80,000 1.14 Diameter
of root:
8-15 cm 4.15 “Xanh”, “Loc vung” VND/tree 80,000 95,000 1.19
4.16 Young rice field VND/m2 2,500 3,000 1.20
4.17 Developing rice field VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
4.18 Complete ploughed, raked field VND/m2 500 600 1.20
4.19 Galangal, ginger, lemongrass,
turmeric VND/m2 7,000 8,000 1.14
4.20 Sweet potato (by bed) VND/m2 1,700 2,000 1.18
4.21 Sweet potato (by cutting) VND/m2 500 600 1.20
4.22 Water morning glory, water-
taro, Indian taro VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
4.23 Cabbage, kohlrabi VND/m2 3,000 4,000 1.33
4.24 Herbs VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20
4.25 Beans, peanut, corn, potato VND/m2 4,500 5,000 1.11
4.26 Water melon, cucumber, tomato VND/m2 3,800 4,000 1.05
4.27 Flowers crop VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20
4.28 “Gac”, Loopah, Pumpkin,
Gourd frame VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
150
Table 4.9: Comments from interviewees in Phuc Khanh commune about the comparison
between unit costs enacted by Thai Binh PPC and the replacement values
Properties
Same as
replacement
costs
Higher than
replacement
costs
Lower than
replacement
costs
% of PPC costs
lower than
replacement costs
Residential land x 40% - 100%
Agricultural land x 15% - 20%
Non-agricultural land x 30% - 75%
Houses and architectural works x 10% - 15%
Fruit and timber trees x 10% - 20%
Annual rice and crops x 10% - 15%
Table 4.10: The results of replacement costs surveyed in Phuc Khanh commune, Hung Ha district
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
1 Land Decision No.3152/QD-UBND, dated 29/12/2012 by Thai
Binh Provincial People‟s Committee
1.1 Residential land
1.1.1 Place on the main surface of
roads. VND/m2 2,500,000 4,500,000 1.80
1.1.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 400,000 1,000,000 2.50
1.1.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 300,000 1,000,000 3.33
1.2 Commercial land, non-
agricultural business
1.2.1 Place on the main surface of
roads. VND/m2 1,250,000 2,000,000 1.60
1.2.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 200,000 500,000 2.50
1.2.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 200,000 500,000 2.50
1.3 Agriculture land
1.3.1 Annual crop Land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10
1.3.2 Perennial Tree Land VND/m2 45,000 50,000 1.11
1.3.3 Aquaculture land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10
151
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
2 Houses, Substructures
Decision No.03/2013/QD-UBND dated 25/02/2013 by Thai
Binh Provincial People‟s Committee refer to Adjustment
the factor of compensation unit prices of construction
works issued Decision No.01/2010/QD-UBND dated
25/01/2010 by Thai Binh Provincial People's Committee
with K = 1.74
2.1 House with 1 floor, high walls
≥ 3m
2.1.1
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 110 with
columns, wooden structures,
roofing tile 22 pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,280,842 2,500,000 1.10
2.1.2
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 220, wooden
structures, roofing tile 22
pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,450,334 2,700,000 1.10
2.1.3
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 110 with
columns, flat roof.
m2 floor 1,594,506 1,700,000 1.07
2.1.4
House made from non-holes
brick, flat roof, wall 220,
without reinforced foundation
and without easements.
m2 floor 1,891,770 2,100,000 1.11
2.1.5
House made from non-holes
brick, flat roof, wall 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles, without easements.
m2 floor 2,126,446 2,300,000 1.08
2.2 House with 2 floors, flat roof
2.2.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
without reinforced foundation
and without easements.
m2 floor 2,937,959 3,600,000 1.23
2.2.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles, without easements
m2 floor 2,853,160 3,500,000 1.23
2.3 House with 3 floors, flat roof,
easements inside house. -
2.3.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles.
m2 floor 3,240,243 4,000,000 1.23
152
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
2.3.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
m2 floor 3,278,567 4,000,000 1.22
2.3.3
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
m2 floor 3,401,368 4,200,000 1.23
2.3.4
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
m2 floor 3,128,660 3,900,000 1.25
2.3.5
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
m2 floor 3,251,462 4,000,000 1.23
2.4 House with 4 floors, flat roof,
easements inside house.
2.4.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
VND/m2
floor 3,372,996 4,200,000 1.25
2.4.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
VND/m2
floor 3,458,191 4,300,000 1.24
2.4.3
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
VND/m2
floor 3,119,476 3,900,000 1.25
2.4.4
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
VND/m2
floor 3,193,759 3,900,000 1.22
2.5 Additional house with high
walls < 3m -
2.5.1
House made from slag brick,
bamboo structure, fibro cement
tiled roof.
m2 floor 1,003,318 1,200,000 1.20
153
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
2.5.2
House made from slag brick,
wooden structure, roofing tile
22 pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,048,017 2,500,000 1.22
2.5.3
House made from slag brick,
steel structure, metal sheet roof
covering.
m2 floor 1,471,836 1,800,000 1.22
3 Other works
3.1 Tank
3.1.1 Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 4m3 VND/m3 1,209,735 1,500,000 1.24
3.1.2
Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, with
concrete slab.
VND/m3 1,039,650 1,200,000 1.15
3.1.3
Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, without
concrete slab
VND/m3 637,710 800,000 1.25
3.2 Yard
3.2.1 Broken brick concrete yard,
smoothed with cement, sand. VND/m2 100,920 126,000 1.25
3.2.2 Oblong brick-paved yard VND/m2 168,780 210,000 1.24
3.2.3 Tile yard VND/m2 170,520 210,000 1.23
3.3 Toilet outside house
3.3.1
Septic toilet (excluding doors
and toilet facilities that will be
detailed measurement multiply
by the unit price at the time of
survey)
VND/m2 6,946,451 8,600,000 1.24
3.3.2
No septic toilet (excluding
doors and toilet facilities that
will be detailed measurement
multiply by the unit price at the
time of survey)
VND/m2 6,778,057 8,400,000 1.24
3.4 Fence
3.4.1 Lattice fence B40 m2 25,000 30,000 1.20
3.4.2 Barbed wire fence 20x20 m2 55,000 65,000 1.18
4 Trees, crops Diameter
of leaf 4.1 Litchi tree VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18
154
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
4.2 Longan, litchi tree (diameter
20-25cm) VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18
canopy:
2-3 m
4.3 Grapefruit tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.4 Orange tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17
4.5 Tangerine tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17
4.6 Kumquat tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10
4.7 Peach, Plum, Apricot (fruit tree) VND/tree 50,000 60,000 1.20
4.8 Mulberry tree VND/tree 180,000 210,000 1.17
4.9 Mango tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.10 “Na” tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.11 Egg tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10
4.12 Peach tree VND/tree 15,000 18,000 1.20
4.13 “Xanh”, “Si” tree (leaf canopy) VND/tree 10,000 12,000 1.20
4.14 “Đa”, “Si”, “Sung” VND/tree 70,000 80,000 1.14 Diameter
of root:
8-15 cm 4.15 “Xanh”, “Loc vung” VND/tree 80,000 95,000 1.19
4.16 Young rice field VND/m2 2,500 3,000 1.20
4.17 Developing rice field VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
4.18 Complete ploughed, raked field VND/m2 500 600 1.20
4.19 Galangal, ginger, lemongrass,
turmeric VND/m2 7,000 8,000 1.14
4.20 Sweet potato (by bed) VND/m2 1,700 2,000 1.18
4.21 Sweet potato (by cutting) VND/m2 500 600 1.20
4.22 Water morning glory, water-
taro, Indian taro VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
4.23 Cabbage, kohlrabi VND/m2 3,000 4,000 1.33
4.24 Herbs VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20
4.25 Beans, peanut, corn, potato VND/m2 4,500 5,000 1.11
4.26 Water melon, cucumber, tomato VND/m2 3,800 4,000 1.05
4.27 Flowers crop VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20
4.28 “Gac”, Loopah, Pumpkin,
Gourd frame VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
155
Table 4.11: Comments from interviewees in Thai Phuong commune about the comparison
between unit costs enacted by Thai Binh PPC and the replacement values
Properties
Same as
replacement
costs
Higher than
replacement
costs
Lower than
replacement
costs
% of PPC costs
lower than
replacement costs
Residential land x 50% - 110%
Agricultural land x 15% - 25%
Non-agricultural land x 65% - 100%
Houses and architectural works x 15% - 25%
Fruit and timber trees x 10% - 15%
Annual rice and crops x 10% - 15%
Table 4.12: The results of replacement costs surveyed in Thai Phuong commune, Hung Ha
district
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
1 Land Decision No.3152/QD-UBND, dated 29/12/2012 by Thai
Binh Provincial People‟s Committee
1.1 Residential land
1.1.1 Place on the main surface of
roads. VND/m2 2,000,000 4,000,000 2.00
1.1.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 400,000 1,000,000 2.50
1.1.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 300,000 1,000,000 3.33
1.2 Commercial land, non-
agricultural business
1.2.1 Place on the main surface of
roads. VND/m2 1,000,000 5,000,000 5.00
1.2.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 200,000 500,000 2.50
1.2.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 200,000 500,000 2.50
1.3 Agriculture land
1.3.1 Annual crop Land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10
1.3.2 Perennial Tree Land VND/m2 45,000 50,000 1.11
1.3.3 Aquaculture land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10
156
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
2 Houses, Substructures
Decision No.03/2013/QD-UBND dated 25/02/2013 by Thai
Binh Provincial People‟s Committee refer to Adjustment
the factor of compensation unit prices of construction
works issued Decision No.01/2010/QD-UBND dated
25/01/2010 by Thai Binh Provincial People's Committee
with K = 1.74
2.1 House with 1 floor, high walls
≥ 3m
2.1.1
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 110 with
columns, wooden structures,
roofing tile 22 pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,280,842 2,500,000 1.10
2.1.2
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 220, wooden
structures, roofing tile 22
pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,450,334 2,700,000 1.10
2.1.3
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 110 with
columns, flat roof.
m2 floor 1,594,506 1,700,000 1.07
2.1.4
House made from non-holes
brick, flat roof, wall 220,
without reinforced foundation
and without easements.
m2 floor 1,891,770 2,100,000 1.11
2.1.5
House made from non-holes
brick, flat roof, wall 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles, without easements.
m2 floor 2,126,446 2,300,000 1.08
2.2 House with 2 floors, flat roof
2.2.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
without reinforced foundation
and without easements.
m2 floor 2,937,959 3,600,000 1.23
2.2.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles, without easements
m2 floor 2,853,160 3,500,000 1.23
2.3 House with 3 floors, flat roof,
easements inside house. -
2.3.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles.
m2 floor 3,240,243 4,000,000 1.23
157
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
2.3.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
m2 floor 3,278,567 4,000,000 1.22
2.3.3
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
m2 floor 3,401,368 4,200,000 1.23
2.3.4
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
m2 floor 3,128,660 3,900,000 1.25
2.3.5
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
m2 floor 3,251,462 4,000,000 1.23
2.4 House with 4 floors, flat roof,
easements inside house.
2.4.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
VND/m2
floor 3,372,996 4,200,000 1.25
2.4.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
VND/m2
floor 3,458,191 4,300,000 1.24
2.4.3
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
VND/m2
floor 3,119,476 3,900,000 1.25
2.4.4
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
VND/m2
floor 3,193,759 3,900,000 1.22
2.5 Additional house with high
walls < 3m -
2.5.1
House made from slag brick,
bamboo structure, fibro cement
tiled roof.
m2 floor 1,003,318 1,200,000 1.20
158
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
2.5.2
House made from slag brick,
wooden structure, roofing tile
22 pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,048,017 2,500,000 1.22
2.5.3
House made from slag brick,
steel structure, metal sheet roof
covering.
m2 floor 1,471,836 1,800,000 1.22
3 Other works
3.1 Tank
3.1.1 Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 4m3 VND/m3 1,209,735 1,500,000 1.24
3.1.2
Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, with
concrete slab.
VND/m3 1,039,650 1,200,000 1.15
3.1.3
Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, without
concrete slab
VND/m3 637,710 800,000 1.25
3.2 Yard
3.2.1 Broken brick concrete yard,
smoothed with cement, sand. VND/m2 100,920 126,000 1.25
3.2.2 Oblong brick-paved yard VND/m2 168,780 210,000 1.24
3.2.3 Tile yard VND/m2 170,520 210,000 1.23
3.3 Toilet outside house
3.3.1
Septic toilet (excluding doors
and toilet facilities that will be
detailed measurement multiply
by the unit price at the time of
survey)
VND/m2 6,946,451 8,600,000 1.24
3.3.2
No septic toilet (excluding
doors and toilet facilities that
will be detailed measurement
multiply by the unit price at the
time of survey)
VND/m2 6,778,057 8,400,000 1.24
3.4 Fence
3.4.1 Lattice fence B40 m2 25,000 30,000 1.20
3.4.2 Barbed wire fence 20x20 m2 55,000 65,000 1.18
4 Trees, crops
Diameter
of leaf 4.1 Litchi tree VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18
159
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
4.2 Longan, litchi tree (diameter
20-25cm) VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18
canopy:
2-3 m
4.3 Grapefruit tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.4 Orange tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17
4.5 Tangerine tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17
4.6 Kumquat tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10
4.7 Peach, Plum, Apricot (fruit tree) VND/tree 50,000 60,000 1.20
4.8 Mulberry tree VND/tree 180,000 210,000 1.17
4.9 Mango tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.10 “Na” tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.11 Egg tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10
4.12 Peach tree VND/tree 15,000 18,000 1.20
4.13 “Xanh”, “Si” tree (leaf canopy) VND/tree 10,000 12,000 1.20
4.14 “Đa”, “Si”, “Sung” VND/tree 70,000 80,000 1.14 Diameter
of root:
8-15 cm 4.15 “Xanh”, “Loc vung” VND/tree 80,000 95,000 1.19
4.16 Young rice field VND/m2 2,500 3,000 1.20
4.17 Developing rice field VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
4.18 Complete ploughed, raked field VND/m2 500 600 1.20
4.19 Galangal, ginger, lemongrass,
turmeric VND/m2 7,000 8,000 1.14
4.20 Sweet potato (by bed) VND/m2 1,700 2,000 1.18
4.21 Sweet potato (by cutting) VND/m2 500 600 1.20
4.22 Water morning glory, water-
taro, Indian taro VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
4.23 Cabbage, kohlrabi VND/m2 3,000 4,000 1.33
4.24 Herbs VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20
4.25 Beans, peanut, corn, potato VND/m2 4,500 5,000 1.11
4.26 Water melon, cucumber, tomato VND/m2 3,800 4,000 1.05
4.27 Flowers crop VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20
4.28 “Gac”, Loopah, Pumpkin,
Gourd frame VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
160
Table 4.13: Comments from interviewees in Hung Ha town about the comparison between
unit costs enacted by Thai Binh PPC and the replacement values
Properties
Same as
replacement
costs
Higher than
replacement
costs
Lower than
replacement
costs
% of PPC costs
lower than
replacement costs
Residential land x 20% - 35%
Agricultural land x 15% - 25%
Non-agricultural land x 20% - 30%
Houses and architectural works x 15% - 20%
Fruit and timber trees x 10% - 20%
Annual rice and crops x 10% - 15%
Table 4.14: The results of replacement costs surveyed in Hung Ha town, Hung Ha district
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
1 Land Decision No.3152/QD-UBND, dated 29/12/2012 by Thai
Binh Provincial People‟s Committee
1.1 Residential land
1.1.1 Place on the main surface of
roads. VND/m2 8,000,000 11,000,000 1.38
1.1.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 1,000,000 1,500,000 1.50
1.1.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 800,000 1,000,000 1.25
1.2 Commercial land, non-
agricultural business
1.2.1 Place on the main surface of
roads. VND/m2 4,000,000 5,500,000 1.38
1.2.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 500,000 800,000 1.60
1.2.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 250,000 400,000 1.60
1.3 Agriculture land
1.3.1 Annual crop Land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10
1.3.2 Perennial Tree Land VND/m2 45,000 50,000 1.11
1.3.3 Aquaculture land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10
161
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
2 Houses, Substructures
Decision No.03/2013/QD-UBND dated 25/02/2013 by Thai
Binh Provincial People‟s Committee refer to Adjustment
the factor of compensation unit prices of construction
works issued Decision No.01/2010/QD-UBND dated
25/01/2010 by Thai Binh Provincial People's Committee
with K = 1.74
2.1 House with 1 floor, high walls
≥ 3m
2.1.1
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 110 with
columns, wooden structures,
roofing tile 22 pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,280,842 2,500,000 1.10
2.1.2
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 220, wooden
structures, roofing tile 22
pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,450,334 2,700,000 1.10
2.1.3
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 110 with
columns, flat roof.
m2 floor 1,594,506 1,700,000 1.07
2.1.4
House made from non-holes
brick, flat roof, wall 220,
without reinforced foundation
and without easements.
m2 floor 1,891,770 2,100,000 1.11
2.1.5
House made from non-holes
brick, flat roof, wall 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles, without easements.
m2 floor 2,126,446 2,300,000 1.08
2.2 House with 2 floors, flat roof
2.2.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
without reinforced foundation
and without easements.
m2 floor 2,937,959 3,600,000 1.23
2.2.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles, without easements
m2 floor 2,853,160 3,500,000 1.23
2.3 House with 3 floors, flat roof,
easements inside house. -
2.3.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles.
m2 floor 3,240,243 4,000,000 1.23
162
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
2.3.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
m2 floor 3,278,567 4,000,000 1.22
2.3.3
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
m2 floor 3,401,368 4,200,000 1.23
2.3.4
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
m2 floor 3,128,660 3,900,000 1.25
2.3.5
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
m2 floor 3,251,462 4,000,000 1.23
2.4 House with 4 floors, flat roof,
easements inside house.
2.4.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
VND/m2
floor 3,372,996 4,200,000 1.25
2.4.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
VND/m2
floor 3,458,191 4,300,000 1.24
2.4.3
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
VND/m2
floor 3,119,476 3,900,000 1.25
2.4.4
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
VND/m2
floor 3,193,759 3,900,000 1.22
2.5 Additional house with high
walls < 3m -
2.5.1
House made from slag brick,
bamboo structure, fibro cement
tiled roof.
m2 floor 1,003,318 1,200,000 1.20
163
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
2.5.2
House made from slag brick,
wooden structure, roofing tile
22 pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,048,017 2,500,000 1.22
2.5.3
House made from slag brick,
steel structure, metal sheet roof
covering.
m2 floor 1,471,836 1,800,000 1.22
3 Other works
3.1 Tank
3.1.1 Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 4m3 VND/m3 1,209,735 1,500,000 1.24
3.1.2
Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, with
concrete slab.
VND/m3 1,039,650 1,200,000 1.15
3.1.3
Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, without
concrete slab
VND/m3 637,710 800,000 1.25
3.2 Yard
3.2.1 Broken brick concrete yard,
smoothed with cement, sand. VND/m2 100,920 126,000 1.25
3.2.2 Oblong brick-paved yard VND/m2 168,780 210,000 1.24
3.2.3 Tile yard VND/m2 170,520 210,000 1.23
3.3 Toilet outside house
3.3.1
Septic toilet (excluding doors
and toilet facilities that will be
detailed measurement multiply
by the unit price at the time of
survey)
VND/m2 6,946,451 8,600,000 1.24
3.3.2
No septic toilet (excluding
doors and toilet facilities that
will be detailed measurement
multiply by the unit price at the
time of survey)
VND/m2 6,778,057 8,400,000 1.24
3.4 Fence
3.4.1 Lattice fence B40 m2 25,000 30,000 1.20
3.4.2 Barbed wire fence 20x20 m2 55,000 65,000 1.18
4 Trees, crops Diameter
of leaf 4.1 Litchi tree VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18
164
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
4.2 Longan, litchi tree (diameter
20-25cm) VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18
canopy:
2-3 m
4.3 Grapefruit tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.4 Orange tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17
4.5 Tangerine tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17
4.6 Kumquat tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10
4.7 Peach, Plum, Apricot (fruit tree) VND/tree 50,000 60,000 1.20
4.8 Mulberry tree VND/tree 180,000 210,000 1.17
4.9 Mango tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.10 “Na” tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.11 Egg tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10
4.12 Peach tree VND/tree 15,000 18,000 1.20
4.13 “Xanh”, “Si” tree (leaf canopy) VND/tree 10,000 12,000 1.20
4.14 “Đa”, “Si”, “Sung” VND/tree 70,000 80,000 1.14 Diameter
of root:
8-15 cm 4.15 “Xanh”, “Loc vung” VND/tree 80,000 95,000 1.19
4.16 Young rice field VND/m2 2,500 3,000 1.20
4.17 Developing rice field VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
4.18 Complete ploughed, raked field VND/m2 500 600 1.20
4.19 Galangal, ginger, lemongrass,
turmeric VND/m2 7,000 8,000 1.14
4.20 Sweet potato (by bed) VND/m2 1,700 2,000 1.18
4.21 Sweet potato (by cutting) VND/m2 500 600 1.20
4.22 Water morning glory, water-
taro, Indian taro VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
4.23 Cabbage, kohlrabi VND/m2 3,000 4,000 1.33
4.24 Herbs VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20
4.25 Beans, peanut, corn, potato VND/m2 4,500 5,000 1.11
4.26 Water melon, cucumber, tomato VND/m2 3,800 4,000 1.05
4.27 Flowers crop VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20
4.28 “Gac”, Loopah, Pumpkin,
Gourd frame VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
165
Table 4.15: Comments from interviewees in Minh Khai commune about the comparison
between unit costs enacted by Thai Binh PPC and the replacement value
Properties
Same as
replacement
costs
Higher than
replacement
costs
Lower than
replacement
costs
% of PPC costs
lower than
replacement costs
Residential land x 60% - 110%
Agricultural land x 15% - 20%
Non-agricultural land x 45% - 70%
Houses and architectural works x 10% - 15%
Fruit and timber trees x 10% - 15%
Annual rice and crops x 10% - 15%
Table 4.16: The results of replacement costs surveyed in Minh Khai commune, Hung Ha
district
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(%)
Remarks
1 Land Decision No.3152/QD-UBND, dated 29/12/2012 by Thai
Binh Provincial People‟s Committee
1.1 Residential land
1.1.1 Place on the main surface of
roads. VND/m2 3,000,000 7,000,000 2.33
1.1.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 400,000 1,000,000 2.50
1.1.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 300,000 1,000,000 3.33
1.2 Commercial land, non-
agricultural business
1.2.1 Place on the main surface of
roads. VND/m2 1,500,000 3,000,000 2.00
1.2.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 200,000 500,000 2.50
1.2.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 200,000 500,000 2.50
1.3 Agriculture land
1.3.1 Annual crop Land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10
1.3.2 Perennial Tree Land VND/m2 45,000 50,000 1.11
1.3.3 Aquaculture land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10
166
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(%)
Remarks
2 Houses, Substructures
Decision No.03/2013/QD-UBND dated 25/02/2013 by Thai
Binh Provincial People‟s Committee refer to Adjustment
the factor of compensation unit prices of construction
works issued Decision No.01/2010/QD-UBND dated
25/01/2010 by Thai Binh Provincial People's Committee
with K = 1.74
2.1 House with 1 floor, high walls
≥ 3m
2.1.1
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 110 with
columns, wooden structures,
roofing tile 22 pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,280,842 2,500,000 1.10
2.1.2
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 220, wooden
structures, roofing tile 22
pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,450,334 2,700,000 1.10
2.1.3
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 110 with
columns, flat roof.
m2 floor 1,594,506 1,700,000 1.07
2.1.4
House made from non-holes
brick, flat roof, wall 220,
without reinforced foundation
and without easements.
m2 floor 1,891,770 2,100,000 1.11
2.1.5
House made from non-holes
brick, flat roof, wall 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles, without easements.
m2 floor 2,126,446 2,300,000 1.08
2.2 House with 2 floors, flat roof
2.2.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
without reinforced foundation
and without easements.
m2 floor 2,937,959 3,600,000 1.23
2.2.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles, without easements
m2 floor 2,853,160 3,500,000 1.23
2.3 House with 3 floors, flat roof,
easements inside house. -
2.3.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles.
m2 floor 3,240,243 4,000,000 1.23
167
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(%)
Remarks
2.3.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
m2 floor 3,278,567 4,000,000 1.22
2.3.3
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
m2 floor 3,401,368 4,200,000 1.23
2.3.4
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
m2 floor 3,128,660 3,900,000 1.25
2.3.5
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
m2 floor 3,251,462 4,000,000 1.23
2.4 House with 4 floors, flat roof,
easements inside house.
2.4.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
VND/m2
floor 3,372,996 4,200,000 1.25
2.4.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
VND/m2
floor 3,458,191 4,300,000 1.24
2.4.3
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
VND/m2
floor 3,119,476 3,900,000 1.25
2.4.4
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
VND/m2
floor 3,193,759 3,900,000 1.22
2.5 Additional house with high
walls < 3m -
2.5.1
House made from slag brick,
bamboo structure, fibro cement
tiled roof.
m2 floor 1,003,318 1,200,000 1.20
168
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(%)
Remarks
2.5.2
House made from slag brick,
wooden structure, roofing tile
22 pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,048,017 2,500,000 1.22
2.5.3
House made from slag brick,
steel structure, metal sheet roof
covering.
m2 floor 1,471,836 1,800,000 1.22
3 Other works
3.1 Tank
3.1.1 Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 4m3 VND/m3 1,209,735 1,500,000 1.24
3.1.2
Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, with
concrete slab.
VND/m3 1,039,650 1,200,000 1.15
3.1.3
Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, without
concrete slab
VND/m3 637,710 800,000 1.25
3.2 Yard
3.2.1 Broken brick concrete yard,
smoothed with cement, sand. VND/m2 100,920 126,000 1.25
3.2.2 Oblong brick-paved yard VND/m2 168,780 210,000 1.24
3.2.3 Tile yard VND/m2 170,520 210,000 1.23
3.3 Toilet outside house
3.3.1
Septic toilet (excluding doors
and toilet facilities that will be
detailed measurement multiply
by the unit price at the time of
survey)
VND/m2 6,946,451 8,600,000 1.24
3.3.2
No septic toilet (excluding
doors and toilet facilities that
will be detailed measurement
multiply by the unit price at the
time of survey)
VND/m2 6,778,057 8,400,000 1.24
3.4 Fence
3.4.1 Lattice fence B40 m2 25,000 30,000 1.20
3.4.2 Barbed wire fence 20x20 m2 55,000 65,000 1.18
4 Trees, crops Diameter
of leaf 4.1 Litchi tree VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18
169
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(%)
Remarks
4.2 Longan, litchi tree (diameter
20-25cm) VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18
canopy:
2-3 m
4.3 Grapefruit tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.4 Orange tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17
4.5 Tangerine tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17
4.6 Kumquat tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10
4.7 Peach, Plum, Apricot (fruit tree) VND/tree 50,000 60,000 1.20
4.8 Mulberry tree VND/tree 180,000 210,000 1.17
4.9 Mango tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.10 “Na” tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.11 Egg tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10
4.12 Peach tree VND/tree 15,000 18,000 1.20
4.13 “Xanh”, “Si” tree (leaf canopy) VND/tree 10,000 12,000 1.20
4.14 “Đa”, “Si”, “Sung” VND/tree 70,000 80,000 1.14 Diameter
of root:
8-15 cm 4.15 “Xanh”, “Loc vung” VND/tree 80,000 95,000 1.19
4.16 Young rice field VND/m2 2,500 3,000 1.20
4.17 Developing rice field VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
4.18 Complete ploughed, raked field VND/m2 500 600 1.20
4.19 Galangal, ginger, lemongrass,
turmeric VND/m2 7,000 8,000 1.14
4.20 Sweet potato (by bed) VND/m2 1,700 2,000 1.18
4.21 Sweet potato (by cutting) VND/m2 500 600 1.20
4.22 Water morning glory, water-
taro, Indian taro VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
4.23 Cabbage, kohlrabi VND/m2 3,000 4,000 1.33
4.24 Herbs VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20
4.25 Beans, peanut, corn, potato VND/m2 4,500 5,000 1.11
4.26 Water melon, cucumber, tomato VND/m2 3,800 4,000 1.05
4.27 Flowers crop VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20
4.28 “Gac”, Loopah, Pumpkin,
Gourd frame VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
170
Table 4.17: Comments from interviewees in Hong Linh commune about the comparison
between unit costs enacted by Thai Binh PPC and the replacement values
Properties
Same as
replacement
costs
Higher than
replacement
costs
Lower than
replacement
costs
% of PPC costs
lower than
replacement costs
Residential land x 70% - 120%
Agricultural land x 15% - 20%
Non-agricultural land x 20% - 30%
Houses and architectural works x 10% - 20%
Fruit and timber trees x 15% - 20%
Annual rice and crops x 10% - 15%
Table 4.18: The results of replacement costs surveyed in Hong Linh commune, Hung Ha
district
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
1 Land Decision No.3152/QD-UBND, dated 29/12/2012 by Thai
Binh Provincial People‟s Committee
1.1 Residential land
1.1.1 Place on the main surface of
roads. VND/m2 1,000,000 4,000,000 4.00
1.1.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 400,000 1,000,000 2.50
1.1.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 300,000 1,000,000 3.33
1.2 Commercial land, non-
agricultural business
1.2.1 Place on the main surface of
roads. VND/m2 500,000 800,000 1.60
1.2.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 200,000 300,000 1.50
1.2.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 200,000 300,000 1.50
1.3 Agriculture land
1.3.1 Annual crop Land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10
1.3.2 Perennial Tree Land VND/m2 45,000 50,000 1.11
1.3.3 Aquaculture land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10
171
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
2 Houses, Substructures
Decision No.03/2013/QD-UBND dated 25/02/2013 by Thai
Binh Provincial People‟s Committee refer to Adjustment
the factor of compensation unit prices of construction
works issued Decision No.01/2010/QD-UBND dated
25/01/2010 by Thai Binh Provincial People's Committee
with K = 1.74
2.1 House with 1 floor, high walls
≥ 3m
2.1.1
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 110 with
columns, wooden structures,
roofing tile 22 pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,280,842 2,500,000 1.10
2.1.2
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 220, wooden
structures, roofing tile 22
pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,450,334 2,700,000 1.10
2.1.3
House with wall made from
non-holes brick 110 with
columns, flat roof.
m2 floor 1,594,506 1,700,000 1.07
2.1.4
House made from non-holes
brick, flat roof, wall 220,
without reinforced foundation
and without easements.
m2 floor 1,891,770 2,100,000 1.11
2.1.5
House made from non-holes
brick, flat roof, wall 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles, without easements.
m2 floor 2,126,446 2,300,000 1.08
2.2 House with 2 floors, flat roof
2.2.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
without reinforced foundation
and without easements.
m2 floor 2,937,959 3,600,000 1.23
2.2.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles, without easements
m2 floor 2,853,160 3,500,000 1.23
2.3 House with 3 floors, flat roof,
easements inside house. -
2.3.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing walls 220,
foundation reinforced bamboo
poles.
m2 floor 3,240,243 4,000,000 1.23
172
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
2.3.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
m2 floor 3,278,567 4,000,000 1.22
2.3.3
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
m2 floor 3,401,368 4,200,000 1.23
2.3.4
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
m2 floor 3,128,660 3,900,000 1.25
2.3.5
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
m2 floor 3,251,462 4,000,000 1.23
2.4 House with 4 floors, flat roof,
easements inside house.
2.4.1
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
VND/m2
floor 3,372,996 4,200,000 1.25
2.4.2
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 220, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
VND/m2
floor 3,458,191 4,300,000 1.24
2.4.3
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced bamboo poles.
VND/m2
floor 3,119,476 3,900,000 1.25
2.4.4
House made from non-holes
brick, load-bearing structural
frame, wall 110, foundation
reinforced concrete pile.
VND/m2
floor 3,193,759 3,900,000 1.22
2.5 Additional house with high
walls < 3m -
2.5.1
House made from slag brick,
bamboo structure, fibro cement
tiled roof.
m2 floor 1,003,318 1,200,000 1.20
173
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
2.5.2
House made from slag brick,
wooden structure, roofing tile
22 pieces/m2.
m2 floor 2,048,017 2,500,000 1.22
2.5.3
House made from slag brick,
steel structure, metal sheet roof
covering.
m2 floor 1,471,836 1,800,000 1.22
3 Other works
3.1 Tank
3.1.1 Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 4m3 VND/m3 1,209,735 1,500,000 1.24
3.1.2
Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, with
concrete slab.
VND/m3 1,039,650 1,200,000 1.15
3.1.3
Tank made from non-holes
brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, without
concrete slab
VND/m3 637,710 800,000 1.25
3.2 Yard
3.2.1 Broken brick concrete yard,
smoothed with cement, sand. VND/m2 100,920 126,000 1.25
3.2.2 Oblong brick-paved yard VND/m2 168,780 210,000 1.24
3.2.3 Tile yard VND/m2 170,520 210,000 1.23
3.3 Toilet outside house
3.3.1
Septic toilet (excluding doors
and toilet facilities that will be
detailed measurement multiply
by the unit price at the time of
survey)
VND/m2 6,946,451 8,600,000 1.24
3.3.2
No septic toilet (excluding
doors and toilet facilities that
will be detailed measurement
multiply by the unit price at the
time of survey)
VND/m2 6,778,057 8,400,000 1.24
3.4 Fence
3.4.1 Lattice fence B40 m2 25,000 30,000 1.20
3.4.2 Barbed wire fence 20x20 m2 55,000 65,000 1.18
4 Trees, crops Diameter
of leaf 4.1 Litchi tree VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18
174
No. Item Unit
Unit
issued by
Province
(VND)
Replacement
cost (VND)
Different
factor
(time)
Remarks
4.2 Longan, litchi tree (diameter
20-25cm) VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18
canopy:
2-3 m
4.3 Grapefruit tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.4 Orange tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17
4.5 Tangerine tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17
4.6 Kumquat tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10
4.7 Peach, Plum, Apricot (fruit tree) VND/tree 50,000 60,000 1.20
4.8 Mulberry tree VND/tree 180,000 210,000 1.17
4.9 Mango tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.10 “Na” tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13
4.11 Egg tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10
4.12 Peach tree VND/tree 15,000 18,000 1.20
4.13 “Xanh”, “Si” tree (leaf canopy) VND/tree 10,000 12,000 1.20
4.14 “Đa”, “Si”, “Sung” VND/tree 70,000 80,000 1.14 Diameter
of root:
8-15 cm 4.15 “Xanh”, “Loc vung” VND/tree 80,000 95,000 1.19
4.16 Young rice field VND/m2 2,500 3,000 1.20
4.17 Developing rice field VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
4.18 Complete ploughed, raked field VND/m2 500 600 1.20
4.19 Galangal, ginger, lemongrass,
turmeric VND/m2 7,000 8,000 1.14
4.20 Sweet potato (by bed) VND/m2 1,700 2,000 1.18
4.21 Sweet potato (by cutting) VND/m2 500 600 1.20
4.22 Water morning glory, water-
taro, Indian taro VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
4.23 Cabbage, kohlrabi VND/m2 3,000 4,000 1.33
4.24 Herbs VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20
4.25 Beans, peanut, corn, potato VND/m2 4,500 5,000 1.11
4.26 Water melon, cucumber, tomato VND/m2 3,800 4,000 1.05
4.27 Flowers crop VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20
4.28 “Gac”, Loopah, Pumpkin,
Gourd frame VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25
top related