department of toxic substances control - ncal...

Post on 27-Jun-2018

219 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Department of Toxic Substances Control

October 27, 2015 Regulatory Update

1

Brian Lewis, PG, CEG, CHG Chief, Geological Services Unit, Berkeley Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program 510-540-3950 Brian.Lewis@dtsc.ca.gov

Myrto Petreas, PhD, MPH Chief, Environmental Chemistry Branch Environmental Chemistry Laboratory (ECL) 510-540-3624 Myrto.Petreas@dtsc.ca.gov

3

• New Director • Organizational/Personnel Updates • Guidance Updates

– Preliminary Endangerment Assessment – Monitoring Well Design and Construction – Human and Ecological Risk Office (HERO)

– Human Health Risk Assessments Notes 1-5 • Groundwater Inspections • Safer Consumer Products Program • Environmental Chemistry Laboratory (ECL)

– Emerging Issues

5

Barbara Lee CalEPA Secretary Matt Rodriquez swore her into office on December 1, 2014, and she was confirmed by the California State Senate on 8/20/2015. • Barbara brings 27 years in environmental and

scientific experience, nearly 20 of which were in a regulatory capacity leading the Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District.

• She has experience organizing and implementing strategy and rule development, and collaborating and leading multi-agency efforts.

6

Vacant Chief Deputy Director

Vacant

8

Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA)

https://www.dtsc.ca.gov/PublicationsForms/upload/PEA_Guidance_Manual.pdf

9

• Interim Final update issued in October 2013. • DTSC accepted comments for one year (ending October

2014). • Comments addressed • Minor changes to equations to reflect U.S. EPA’s updated

default exposure models. • Final guidance October 2015

10 https://www.dtsc.ca.gov/PublicationsForms/upload/Well_Design_Constr_for_Monitoring_GWContam_Sites1.pdf

Final: June 2014

11

DTSC ACKNOWLEDGES AND THANKS (External Reviewers)

• David W. Abbott, Consultant • Katherine Baylor, USEPA • Thomas J. Berkins, Alameda County Water District • John Cherry, University of Guelph • Murray Einarson, Haley & Aldrich • Sonne Fleming, PC Exploration • Gary Foote, Terra Pacific Group • John McHugh, GRA Technical Committee • William McIlvride, Weiss Associates • Roger Papler, SF RWQCB • Eric Senter, DWR • Murray Wunderly, Terra Pacific Group

12

New: 2.0 Planning • Triad, CSM, DQOs • Characterization vs. Monitoring • Sealing Confining Layers • Multi-Level Systems (MLSs) • Horizontal Wells • Direct Push Wells

Updated: 3.0 Monitoring Well Design and Construction • Nebraska Grout Study • Pre-Packed Screens

Few changes: 4.0 Well Casing and Screen Materials • Caution Re: Use of newer materials/innovative

designs

13

• Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) Notes 1 through 5

– Provides recommendations and guidance on specific health risk assessment issues.

• Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) Notes 1 through 6 – Clarifies specific issues not addressed in DTSC’s Guidance for Ecological Risk

Assessment released in 1996.

Focusing tonight on HHRA Notes

14

HHRA Note 1 Recommended DTSC default exposure factors for use in risk assessments at California hazardous waste sites and permitted facilities • Most recent Issue date: September 30, 2014 (consistent with USEPA OSWER Guidance)

HHRA Note 2 Interim guidance for addressing dioxins and dioxin-like compounds. • Most recent issue date: May 2009

HHRA Note 3 Guidance for using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) in the human health risk assessment process at California hazardous substances release sites and permitted facilities • US EPA RSLs for about 750 chemicals are updated twice a year • Presents DTSC-modified screening levels for some chemicals (using State of CA toxicity values) • Most referenced HHRA Note. Lookup tables included • Most recent issue date: October 12, 2015

15

HHRA Note 4 • Current recommended methodology for conducting screening-level human health risk

assessments • Methodology presented in the PEA guidance manual is consistent with Note 4 • Most recent issue date: October 6, 2015 HHRA Note 5 • Human health-based indoor air screening criteria for trichloroethylene (TCE) re: Short-term

Action Levels of USEPA Region 9’s July 8 2014 memorandum • Discussion of the relationship between groundwater TCE concentrations and the

recommended extent of indoor air sampling • Short-term action levels for indoor air TCE concentrations for residential and

commercial/industrial buildings • Most recent issue date: August 23, 2014

https://www.dtsc.ca.gov/assessingrisk/humanrisk2.cfm

16

17

• Focused Groundwater inspection – Observe sampling

• 55 sites • Findings Sept 2013 to October 2014:

– 14 audits 10 well maintenance issues 7 Sampling and Analysis Plans issues

Implementation Update

19

• Safer consumer products. • Greater market opportunities for

innovative companies • Healthier us!

20

23 Authoritative Lists referenced • Quarterly Updates

Exclusions • Pesticides • Prescription drugs • Metabolite/breakdown

products • Radioactive chemicals • Natural toxins

>1,100 Chemicals http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SCP/ChemList.cfm

21

1. Chemicals

2. Products (Product-Chemical Combinations)

Candidate Chemicals List

Priority Products

Alternatives Selection

4. Regulatory Response

3. Alternatives Analysis

22

Children’s Foam-padded Sleeping Products with TDCPP and TCEP

Spray Polyurethane Foam systems with Methylene DiphenyI Diisocyanate

Paint Strippers containing Methylene Chloride

23

• Dermal, ingestion, inhalation exposure pathways • Biomonitoring data • Chemicals found in indoor air monitoring • Sensitive subpopulations – children, workers • Aquatic resource impacts • Water quality monitoring evidence

24

7 Product Categories

• Beauty, Personal Care and Hygiene Products • Building Products - Paints, Adhesives, Sealants, Flooring • Household/Office Furniture/Furnishings • Cleaning Products • Clothing • Fishing and Angling Equipment • Office Machinery Consumable Products

25

• Once the Rules for the 3 Products are final, manufacturers will: • Notify DTSC they make a product. • Evaluate alternatives

• DTSC just released DRAFT Stage 1 Alternatives Analysis Guide

• Seek your feedback now until November 16, 2015.

Myrto Petreas, Ph.D., MPH

27

Provide DTSC, Cal/EPA and other agencies with scientific leadership and laboratory capacity in environmental analytical chemistry.

28

Environmental Analytical Chemistry • Consultation • Sample analysis • Method development • QA/QC reviews • Applied research in support of new initiatives

29

• Metals • Volatiles and semi-volatiles • Diesel, motor oil, gasoline • Pesticides, PCBs, Dioxins • Chemicals of emerging concern

₋ Flame retardants ₋ Fluorinated chemicals

30

31

• The study of the sources, pathways, transport, effects and fate of chemicals in the air, water, soil, wildlife and humans.

• Interdisciplinary • Multimedia

• 30+ years of expertise

32

• Vision • Serendipity • Synergy • Quality

33

In the late 1970s, the Hazardous Materials Laboratory (HML) was formed to support enforcement of regulations and clean up hazardous waste sites.

Dr. Stephens, Lab Chief

35

1987 explosion and fire at Koppers Wood Treatment Plant (Oroville)

• Extensive sampling of soil and vegetation • Sampling expanded to grazing animals and residents

Pentachlorophenol Dioxins

36

Staff trained at CDC were able to analyze Dioxins in soil, chicken eggs and tissues.

37

• First grant (USEPA) to study Dioxin uptake in grazing animals.

• Chicken feeding study (bioaccumulation and depuration in eggs, liver, muscle).

• Publications were used extensively during Belgian egg crisis (late 1990s).

38

• Transformer explosion (Dept. of Education building in Sacramento)

• Metal recovery site cleanups (Mobile Smelting) • Superfund sites (McCormick-Baxter)

39

• Grazing cows integrate contaminants over entire field

• Fewer samples

• Faster decision making

40

Human Biomonitoring

41

• Flame retardants • Added to products

• Dubious efficacy

42

43

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000

ng/g

lipi

d

44

• Legislative restrictions on PBDE use (2003)

• Changing flammability standards (2014)

• PBDE levels are dropping

45

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

BDE-47 BDE-99 BDE-100 BDE-153 BDE-154 BDE-207 BDE-209

ng/g

lipi

d w

eigh

t 2008-2010

2011-2013

p = 0.016

p = 0.025

p = 0.061

p = 0.034 p = 0.013

p = 0.049

(N=21)

(N=22)

Guo et al. submitted

Bay area cats >10 years old HT & non-HT

47

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2008-09 2011-12 2013-14

Aver

age

Ʃ5PB

DEs (

ng/g

lipi

d)

SF General Hospital 1st time mom 2nd trimester early-mid 20s

39% (Zota et al 2013)

?

Ʃ5PBDEs = BDE -28, 47, 99, 100, 153

(N=25) (N=36) (N=50)

(Parry et al. in prep)

BDE-209 in Dust from occupational settings 47

1 4

6

17 20

0

10

20

30

40

50

CAFH,n=27

Japan,Offices,

n=14

MA,Offices,

n=31

UK,Offices,

n=18

Planes,n=20

Thailand,E-waste,

n=25

Med

ian

BDE-

209

Conc

entr

atio

n, µ

g/g

California Firehouses (CAFH) Offices Airplanes E-waste Facility

48

49

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

TBB TBPH BTBPE DBDPE

GM

(ng/

g)

CA Fire Houses 2010 (n=27)

CA Residences 2010 (n=59)

Boston Residences 2006 (n=19)*

* H Stapleton et al, Environ. Sci. Tech. 42, 2008, 6910-6918

Major BFRs in Firehouse and House Dust (Brown et al. 2014)

Firemaster 550®

50

51

• From packaging, water/stain resistant items, firefighting foams,…

• Contaminant at fire-fighting training areas, burn pits,…

• Adapted method (originally developed for blood) to support groundwater cleanups

Firefighting Foams at Air Force Bases

52

USEPA’s Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR) reports PFCs in drinking water supply California Teachers Study: Blood PFCs in ~2000 women across California Those living in zip codes served by Water Districts with high PFCs had higher PFC blood levels than the rest (p<0.004)

53

54

• Contribute to Chemicals selection • Coordinate with the California Biomonitoring Program • Exposure assessment techniques

• Blood, urine, hand wipes, house dust, furnishings

• Intervention study

55

Measuring contaminants: • Groundwater • Soil • Sediments • House dust • Wildlife • Human specimens

56

myrto.petreas@dtsc.ca.gov Brian.Lewis@dtsc.ca.gov

top related