crt report 2013

Post on 21-Jan-2016

34 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

CRT Report 2013. Park City school district. PSCD Strengths. For the past 10 years, a greater percentage of PCSD students have demonstrated proficiency, in all core subject areas, than the Utah state average - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

CRT REPORT 2013PARK CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

PSCD STRENGTHS

• For the past 10 years, a greater percentage of PCSD students have demonstrated proficiency, in all core subject areas, than the Utah state average

• There has been a 41% increase in the number of Hispanic students and a 31% increase in Low Income students since 2004, there have been consistent increases in overall proficiency rates in all subjects

• 5 out of 7 schools have demonstrated consistent improvement in proficiency rates in all subject areas over the past 10 years.

• 7 out of 7 have demonstrated overall increases in Language Arts

• 6 out of 7 have demonstrated overall increases in Math• 6 out of 7 have demonstrated overall increases in Science

• All schools have made significant strides in closing the achievement gap in all subjects

District Wide and State

Comparisons

2013 CRT PROFICIENCY

Language Arts Math Science

91%84% 84%84%

73% 73%

PSCDUtah

CRT PROFICIENCY RATES OVERTIME

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

86% 85%

88% 89% 89%90% 91% 92% 92% 91%

76% 77% 78% 77% 78% 79%81%

82%84% 84%

Language Arts

PCSD Utah

*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013

CRT PROFICIENCY RATES OVERTIME

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

85%83%

87%85% 86%

83% 82% 82% 82%84%

70%72% 72%

70%71%

66%68% 69% 69%

73%

Math

PCSD Utah

*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013Mathematics scores from 2009 received a new cut score which changed the scaling and equating. Data from 2009 and on are not comparable to prior years.

CRT PROFICIENCY RATES OVERTIME

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

80%

83% 84%82% 82%

84% 85% 84% 84% 84%

0.7 0.70.72 0.73

Science

PCSD Utah

*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013State data reports do not include CRT science scores past 2010.

TRENDS OVERTIME BY SUBJECT

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

86%85%

88%89% 89% 90%

91%92% 92%

91%

85%83%

87%85% 86%

83%82% 82% 82%

84%

80%

83%84%

82% 82%

84%85%

84% 84% 84%

Park City

Language Arts Math Science

*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013

Closing the Achievement Gap

CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%96%

88%

68%

Language Arts

PCSD Caucasian PCSD Hispanic Utah Causcasian Utah Hispanic

% P

rofi

cie

nt

*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013

CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

90%

60%

78%

55%

Math

PCSD Caucasian PCSD Hispanic Utah Causcasian Utah Hispanic

% P

rofi

cie

nt

*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013Mathematics scores from 2009 received a new cut score which changed the scaling and equating. Data from 2009 and on are not comparable to prior years.

CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

92%

0.79

0.48

Science

PCSD Caucasian PCSD Hispanic Utah Causcasian Utah Hispanic

% P

rofi

cie

nt

*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013

CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0

100

200

300

400

500

60092% 91%

93% 94% 94% 95% 95% 96% 97% 96%

33%37%

43%

49%

54%

59%

65%69%

68% 68%

353

567

PCSD Language Arts

% Proficient Caucasian % Proficient HispanicLinear (% Proficient Hispanic) Hispanic N

% P

rofi

cie

nt

His

pa

nic

N S

ize

*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013

CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

90% 89%92% 91% 92%

88% 88% 88% 88% 90%

38%40%

49%

45%

51%

48%

52%

52%

57%60%

346

518

PCSD Math

% Proficient Caucasian % Proficient HispanicLinear (% Proficient Hispanic) Hispanic N

% P

rofi

cie

nt

His

pa

nic

N S

ize

*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013Mathematics scores from 2009 received a new cut score which changed the scaling and equating. Data from 2009 and on are not comparable to prior years.

CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

85%87%

89%87% 88%

90% 90% 91% 92% 92%

25%

33%

31%28%

32%

41%45%

42%

47%

47%

216

478

PCSD Science

% Proficient Caucasian % Proficient HispanicLinear (% Proficient Hispanic) Hispanic N

% P

rofi

cie

nt

His

pa

nic

N S

ize

*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013

PSCD AREAS FOR GROWTH

• District-wide Math proficiency rates have remained relatively constant across the past ten years.

• District-wide Science proficiency rates have remained relatively constant over the past ten years.

• Trend lines show progress, but the achievement gap continues to be an area of need and focus

top related