copy of modul 1 intro pm- kms 3033 2009
Post on 06-Apr-2018
223 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
1/30
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
2/30
Performance Management
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
3/30
Performance Management
Overview and scenario
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
4/30
Key Words and Characteristics
Explaining 21st Century
The borderless world (Harris, 2002)
Stif compentencies (Shurchuluu, 2002)
The digital era/ information age (Kandampully,2002; Mukherji, 2002)
Global market (Hendrick & Ludeman, 2002)
K-economy (Mukherji, 2002)
World is flat (Friedman, 2005)
E-government (Golicic, Davis, McCathy &Meutzer, 2002)
Globalisation (Friedman, 2005)
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
5/30
Key Words and Characteristics Explaining Person
Competencies in 21st Century
Emotional spiritual quotient (Ary Ginanjar
Agustian, 2006)
Synergy or strife (Hauff, 1989)
labor-management cooperation (Gatchalian &
Gatchalian, 2003)
Human capital (Perez & Ordenez, 2003)
Nano workers (Juran Institute, 2007)
Intellectual capital (Nedlrum & Erickson, 2001)
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
6/30
Key Words and Characteristics Explaining Research in
Performance management in the 21st Century
Link with strategic agenda (Rusli Ahmad,
2007a)
Developmental approach (more open and
transparent) (Rusli Ahmad, 2006)
Expert witness (Simmons, 2002) User friendly of the instrument (
Well-established key-components (Coutts &
Schneider, 2004)
Process (Khoury & Analoi, 2004)
Cognitive process (Rusli Ahmad & Nur Azman
Ali, 2004)
Purpose of PA (Yongcourt, Leiva & Jones, 2007)
TQM (Soltani, 2005) Accuracy and halo (Van Scooter, Moustafa,Burnett & Michael, 2007)
Satisfaction (Cook & Crossman, 2004) Coaching (Brackett, Reid & Green, 2007)
External control management technique (Law,
2007)
Behaviour based competencies (Catona, Darr &
Cambell, 2007)
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
7/30
Related Issues:
Issue 1: The performancephilosophy
a. Administrative
b. Judgemental
c. Development
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
8/30
Issue2:
Roles and responsibilities
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
9/30
Issue 3:
Measurement or methods
-Trait
- Behaviour
- Result
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
10/30
Issue 5:
Performance management process- continuous/ on going
- Reciprocal
- Matrix- hybrid
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
11/30
Issue 6:
Objective and standard of evaluation
- core business- Job description
- KPI
- Profit/ loss
- Tangible/ intangible
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
12/30
Issue 7:
Performance mentoring andcontrol
- Advising- Helping
- Facilitating
- Coaching- negotiating
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
13/30
Issue 8:
Individual performance or teamor group performance
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
14/30
Issue 9:
Performance audit- before
- during
- after
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
15/30
Issue 10:
The forecasting issues/
strategic agenda
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
16/30
Issue 11:
Leadership styles and effective
performance management
- Autocratic- Democratic
- Laizze-faire
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
17/30
Issue 12:
The political mask
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
18/30
Issue 13:
Customer and user friendlinessof performance management
system
- is it only the form/
instrument?
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
19/30
Issue 14:
Win-win situation/ smartpartnership
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
20/30
Issue 15:
Performance training
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
21/30
Issue 16:
TQM/ quality issue
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
22/30
Issue 17:
Communication and socialcultural context
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
23/30
Issue 18:
Profit and loss
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
24/30
Issue 19:
360 feedback
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
25/30
Issue 20:
The performance managementconflict
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
26/30
Issue 21:
Internal and external process
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
27/30
What are the challenges?
Fairness
Various factors
Subjectivity
Quota system
Criticisms
Organization
culture
Acceptability
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
28/30
Conclusion
21st
century- change in workcharacteristics
Amends, reconstruct and revise of
the performance managementpractice
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
29/30
References
Ahmad, R. and Spicer, D.P. (2002) A study ofCognitive Processing Models Used in the AppraisalSystem: The Malaysian Public Service,Asian Academyof Management Journal, 7(2), 1-16.
Ahmad, R. and Ali, N. A. (2003) The Use of CognitiveMapping Technique in Management Research: Theoryand Practice,Management Research News, 26 (7), 1-15.
Ahmad, R. and Ali, N. A. (2004) Performance AppraisalDecision in the Malaysian Public Service,InternationalJournal of Public Sector Management 17(1), 4864.
Ahmad, R. and Spicer, D.P. (2006) CognitiveProcessing Models in Performance Appraisal: Evidencefrom the Malaysian Education System,Human
Resource International Journal, 16 (2), 214-230.
-
8/3/2019 Copy of Modul 1 Intro PM- KMS 3033 2009
30/30
Billsberry J. (2000) The Effective Manager: Perspective and Illustrations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Catano, V.M., Darr, W. and Campbell, C.A. (2007) Performance appraisal of behavior-based competencies: a reliable and valid procedure. Personnel
Psychology. Vol. 60 (1), pp. 201-230.
Coutts, L.M. and Schneider F.W. (2004) Police officer performance appraisal systems: How good are they?An International Journal of Police Strategies and
anagement. Vol. 27 (1), pp. 6781.
Cook, J. and Crossman A. (2004) Satisfaction with performance appraisal systems: A study of role perceptions Journal of Managerial Psychology. Vol. 19
(5), pp. 526541.
Khoury G.C. and Analoui (2004) Innovative management model for performance appraisal: the case of the Palestinian public universities. Management
esearch News. Vol. 27 (1/2) pp. 5673.Kandampully, J. (2002) Innovation as the core competency of a service organisation: the role of technology, knowledge and networks.European Journal of
Innovation Management. Vol. 5 (1), pp. 1826.
Muhd Rais Abdul Karim (1999) The Challenging of Malaysia Public Service. Kuala Lumpur: Pelanduk.
Mukherji A. (2002) The evolution of information systems: their impact on organizations and structures.Management Decision. Vol. 40 (5), pp. 497507.
Nerdrum, L. and Erikson T. (2001) Intellectual capital: a human capitalperspective.Journal of Intellectual Capital. Vol. 2 (2), pp. 127135.
Perez, J.R. and de Pablos, D.O (2003) Knowledge management and organizational impetitiveness: A framework for human capital analysisJournal of
Knowledge Management. Vol. 7 (3), pp. 8291.
Rusli Ahmad (2007a)Employees Appraisal: Everything You Have Always Wanted to Know. Kuching, RS Group.Rusli Ahmad (2007b)Employees Appraisal and cognitive information system. Kuching, Penerbit UNIMAS.
Rusli Ahmad (2003) Cognitive Processing System in Performance Appraisal Decision Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy Thesis. University of Bradford
Management School, United Kingdom.
Rusli Ahmad and Nur Azman Ali (2004) Performance appraisal decision in Malaysian public service. International Journal of Public Sector Management.
Vol. 17 (1) pp. 4864.
Rusli Ahmad and Spicer D.P. (2002) A Study of the Cognitive Processing Models used in the Appraisal System. The Malaysian Public Service,ASIAN
Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 1-16.
Rusli Ahmadand Spicer D.P. (2001a) Cognitive Processing Models in Performance Appraisal: Evidence from the Malaysian Public Sector. Paper presented at
EDAMBA Summer School, Bonas (21-26 July).
Rusli Ahmadand Spicer, D.P. (2001b) A study of Cognitive Processing Model (CPM) for the Malaysian Public Service (MPS) New Performance AppraisalSystem (NPAS),The Fourth ASIAN Academy of Management (AAM) Conference 2001 Proceedings (Volume 1) (10-13 November), Johor Bharu, Malaysia,
pp. 440449.
Rusli Ahmad and Spicer D.P. (2000) Practice of Performance Appraisal in the Malaysian Public Service: Proposal for Research Exploring the Cognitive
Processing Model. Paper Presented at the First Symposium on Graduate Management Research, Universiti Utara Malaysia (15-16 November).
Shurcluluu, P. (2002) National productivity and competitive strategies for the new millenniumIntegrated Manufacturing Systems Journal. Vol. 13 (6), pp.
408414.
Simmons J. (2004) An expertwitness perspective on performance appraisal in universities and collegesEmployee Relation. Vol. 24 (1), pp 86100.
Soltani, E. (2005) Conflict between theory and practice: TQM and performance appraisalInternational Journal of Quality and Reliability Management. Vol.
22 (8), pp. 796818.
Youngcourt, S.S. and Leiva, P.I. and Jones R.G., (2007) Perceived purposes of performance appraisal: Correlates of individual- and position-focused purposes
top related