cooperation issues in developing the bop market - amcis

Post on 19-Jan-2015

1.143 Views

Category:

Education

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

The basic argument of this paper is that successful contribution of ICT to development goals is partly dependent on the nature of the cooperation between partners. Thus if there is a need to assess the contribution of ICT, then one needs to look further than just the basic quantitative measures and include cooperation issues as criteria for success. The purpose of the research reported in this paper was therefore to take one step closer towards a framework of cooperation issues in so-called BOP projects, specifically in the ICT arena, with the ultimate aim of developing a way to assess factors that may present a risk to the success of these projects. This framework could serve as the foundation for further research into developing a diagnostic instrument for this purpose. Presentation by Gilbert Silvius for paper "Cooperation issues in developing the BOP market", AMCIS Proceedings , San Francisco, USA, August 2009.

TRANSCRIPT

Cooperation issues in developing the BOP market

Kobus SmitAnand SheombarGilbert Silvius

Utrecht University of Applied ScienceThe Netherlands

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Contact e-mail addresses: Anand.Sheombar@gmail.com Kobus.Smit@hu.nl Gilbert.Silvius@hu.nl

6,776,034,371

Presenter
Presentation Notes
http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/popclockworld.html 07/10/09 at 11:51 GMT (EST+5) is��

World population

60

Presenter
Presentation Notes
http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/popclockworld.html 07/10/09 at 11:51 GMT (EST+5) is��

Bottom of the Pyramid

Bottom of the Pyramid

Presenter
Presentation Notes
BOP market - $5 trillion. Total by income segment. (Page 13, The Next 4 Billion: Market Size and Business Strategy at the Base of the Pyramid) Four billion people form the base of the economic pyramid (BOP) – those with annual incomes below $3,000 (in local purchasing power). The BOP makes up 72 percent of the 5,575 million people recorded by available national household surveys worldwide and an overwhelming majority of the population in the developing countries of Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, and Latin America and the Caribbean – home to nearly all the BOP. This large segment of humanity faces significant unmet needs and lives in relative poverty: in current U.S. dollars their incomes are less than $3.35 a day in Brazil, $2.11 in China, $1.89 in Ghana, and $1.56 in India. Yet together they have substantial purchasing power: the BOP constitutes a $5 trillion global consumer market.

5,000,000,000,000

Presenter
Presentation Notes
http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/popclockworld.html 07/10/09 at 11:51 GMT (EST+5) is��

Estimated BOP market

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Estimated BOP market by sector (Page 29, The Next 4 Billion: Market Size and Business Strategy at the Base of the Pyramid) Sector markets for the 4 billion BOP consumers range widely in size. Some are relatively small, such as water ($20 billion) and information and communications technology, or ICT ($51 billion as measured, but probably twice that now as a result of rapid growth). Some are medium scale, such as health ($158 billion), transportation ($179 billion), housing ($332 billion), and energy ($433 billion). And some are truly large, such as food ($2,895 billion).

The BOP & ICT Research Project

How can Multinational Information and Communication Technology companies (ICT MNCs) gain benefit from entering the Bottom of the Pyramid (BoP) market in a commercial successful and sustainable way?

And what could be the opportunities in the BoP market for multinational ICT companies?

Why BoP as a Market?

better meet their needs

increase their productivity and incomes

empower their entry into the formal economy

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Four billion low-income consumers, a majority of the world’s population, constitute the base of the economic pyramid (BOP). New empirical measures of their aggregate purchasing power and their behavior as consumers suggest significant opportunities for market-based approaches to: better meet their needs, increase their productivity and incomes, and empower their entry into the formal economy.

A Mindshift …

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Four billion low-income consumers, a majority of the world’s population, constitute the base of the economic pyramid (BOP). New empirical measures of their aggregate purchasing power and their behavior as consumers suggest significant opportunities for market-based approaches to: better meet their needs, increase their productivity and incomes, and empower their entry into the formal economy.

… also in Business

BOP 1.0 BOP 2.0 BOP as consumer Deep listening Reduce price points Redesign packaging, extend distribution Arm’s length relationships mediated by NGOs

BOP as business partner Deep dialogue

Expand imagination Marry capabilities, build shared commitment

Direct, personal relationships facilitated by NGOs “Selling to the Poor” “Business Co-Venturing”

Table 1: First Generation BOP Strategy compared with the new BOP (2.0) strategy (Hart et al., 2008)

Three elements...

Research Questions

What are the difficulties that ICT MNCsexperience in their cooperation with partners in their efforts to reach the BOP market;

And more specifically, how could these observed issues be categorized

Local

for-profit

organisationLocal

Non-profit

organisation

MNC

ICT

“an association between two or more persons, groups, or

organizations who join togetherto achieve a common goal that

neither one alone can accomplish”

(Mullinix, 2002:78)

Partnerships are…

Partnerships are…

Important

Have some advantages

Need to be managed

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Increases chances for success: London and Hart (2004), Jenkins (2007) Advantage: Collaboration allows parties to share knowledge and information, pools scarce or diverse assets and resources, access new sources of innovation, create economies of scale and enhance the legitimacy of the parties’ own individual activities. Factors: Unwin (2005) Trust; Focus; Champions; Sustainability; Balance between demand and supply; Networking and Transparency and sound ethical basis

The Research – 10 Cases

10 Cases M-Pesa Village Phone in Uganda Village Connection Unlimited Potential Public-private partnerships - Tapping into innovation Public-private partnerships - ICT & media i-Community in South Africa World ahead (e.g. Classmate PC) Digital Bridge Communication for all

The Research – Sources of Evidence

Interviews Archival records Documents

The Research - Analysis

USED basic analysis techniques of grounded theory

NOT develop grounded theory

Findings- Cooperation Issues

Driving force factors Skill factors Input-Output factors Socio-cultural factors Systems factors Trust factors

Driving Force Factors

Driving Force factors refers to problems that occur as a result of misaligned fundamental driving forces that shape the goals, purposes and process of ICT projects in developing countries, both from the perspective of the ICT MNC as well as that of local partners

Skills Factors

ICT MNCs tend to have unrealistic expectations about local skills and knowledge on a variety of topics ranging from IT skills and knowledge to managerial skills and knowledge.

Input-Output Factors

Input-Output factors refer to difficulties that may arise as a result of unequal investments by partners in projects, as well as unequal gains by partners from their projects.

Socio-cultural Factors

Difficulties related to social & cultural differences

System Factors

Difficulties relating to the integration of systems, as well as the eventual use thereof

Trust Factors

Includes issues related to expectation management as well as business desirability bias

Factors Examples of Relevant LiteratureDriving force factors

Different foci on results versus process (Kumar et al., 2005)Technocratic approach of MNCs (Chio, 2005)Over-emphasis on "top-down, closed access and 'expert' driven" research

(Gurstein, 2005)Bottom-up approach that builds on indigenous knowledge (Simanis et al.,

2008b) Failure to continuously monitor the relationship (Seelos and Mair, 2007)

Skill factors Becoming and staying aware of the variety of resources, e.g. Prahalad (2005), Simanis et al. (2008a) and Jenkins (2007)

Input-Output factors

Sustainable business (Prahalad, 2005, Simanis et al., 2008b)Business partnerships related to intellectual property and patents

(Matson, 2006)Socio-cultural factors

Social embeddedness (London and Hart, 2004)Culture shock (Oberg, 1960, Marx, 2001)U-curve theory e.g. Lysgaard and (Ward et al., 1998)

Systems factors Integration of systems (Butt et al., 2008)Trust factors Trust as a relevant factor (Das and Teng, 2001).

"Social desirability bias" (Randall et al., 1993)

The road ahead

Limitations Future research Recommendations

top related