converse v. autonomie project - complaint
Post on 14-Apr-2018
220 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 1/85
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
__________________________________________
)
CONVERSE INC., ))
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-12220
)
AUTONOMIE PROJECT, INC. )
)
Defendant. ) Jury Trial Demanded
__________________________________________)
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, Converse Inc. (“Converse”), for its complaint against Defendant, Autonomie
Project, Inc. (“Autonomie”), based on provisional knowledge and on information and belief as
appropriate, alleges as follows:
The Parties
1. Converse is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Delaware with a principal place of business at One High Street, North Andover, Massachusetts
01845.
2. On information and belief, Autonomie is a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Massachusetts with a principal place of business at 2 Hagar Street,
#2, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts 02130.
Jurisdiction and Venue
3. This is an action for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, unfair
competition, trademark dilution, and unfair business practices. This action arises under the
Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq. (“Lanham Act”), Massachusetts General Law
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 1 of 18
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 2/85
- 2 -
Chapter 110H, Massachusetts General Law Chapter 93A, and the common law of the State of
Massachusetts.
4. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to at least 15
U.S.C. § 1121(a) and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a) & (b), and 1367(a).
5. On information and belief, Autonomie operates a website at
www.autonomieproject.com, where Autonomie advertises, offers for sale, and sells footwear and
other products to customers, including customers in the State of Massachusetts and in this
District.
6.
On information and belief, this Court may exercise personal jurisdiction over
Autonomie based upon its contacts with this forum, including at least having a principal place of
business here, regularly and intentionally doing business here, and committing acts giving rise to
this lawsuit here.
7. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to at least 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b)
and (c).
General Allegations – Converse’s Marks
8. Converse owns common law and federal trademark rights in the appearance of the
outsole, midsole, and upper designs commonly used in connection with Converse’s Chuck
Taylor All Star shoes, including but not limited to the design of two stripes on a midsole, the
design of a toe cap, the design of a multi-layered toe bumper featuring diamonds and line
patterns, and the relative position of these elements to each other, as well as U.S. Trademark
Registrations Nos. 1,588,960; 3,258,103; 4,062,112; and 4,065,482 (collectively, the “Converse
Trade Dress”) (copies of these Registrations are attached as Exhibits 1-4). Trademark
Registration No. 1,588,960 has become incontestable and constitutes conclusive evidence of the
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 2 of 18
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 3/85
- 3 -
validity of the trademark and of Converse’s ownership of and exclusive right to use the
trademark. Exemplary images of the Converse Trade Dress are shown Illustration 1 below.
Illustration 1: Examples of the Converse Trade Dress
9. First introduced around 1917, Converse has spent millions of dollars advertising
and promoting shoes bearing the Converse Trade Dress. Converse’s advertisements and
promotions of the Converse Trade Dress have appeared in print, on the Internet, on billboards, in
videos, and at retail. Example advertisements of the Converse Trade Dress are attached to this
Complaint as Exhibit 5. Over the past four years alone, Converse has spent more than $92
million advertising and promoting the Converse Trade Dress in the United States.
10. Converse has sold shoes bearing the Converse Trade Dress throughout the world
and in every state of the United States. Converse sells shoes bearing the Converse Trade Dress
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 3 of 18
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 4/85
- 4 -
through its own retail stores, on the Internet, and through a wide variety of retailers including, for
example, Nordstrom, Kohl’s, JC Penney, Foot Locker, Saks Fifth Avenue, and independent shoe
retailers of all sizes throughout the country. Since its introduction around 1917, Converse has
sold over one billion pairs of shoes bearing the Converse Trade Dress. Over the past decade,
Converse sold over 153 million pairs of shoes bearing the Converse Trade Dress throughout the
United States, and those sales earned Converse more than $2.4 billion in gross U.S. revenue.
Over the past five and one half years alone, Converse sold well over 100 million pairs of shoes
bearing the Converse Trade Dress throughout the United States, and those sales earned Converse
more than $1.8 billion in gross U.S. revenue.
11. The Converse Trade Dress is also the subject of widespread and unsolicited public
attention. This publicity extends from acclaim in books, magazines, and newspapers to frequent
appearances in movies and television shows. As representative examples, the Converse Trade
Dress is the subject of books including “Chucks!: The Phenomenon of Converse Chuck Taylor
All Stars,” and “Chuck Taylor, All Star,” where the Converse Trade Dress is described as an
icon of American footwear and the most famous athletic shoe in history. Example excerpts from
these books are attached to this Complaint as Exhibit 6. The Converse Trade Dress has also been
featured in numerous newspaper and magazine articles, and is the focus of Internet chatter and
fan sites such as chucksconnection.com, which celebrates the Converse Trade Dress and its
presence throughout American culture. Example articles and website images illustrating the
unsolicited publicity of the Converse Trade Dress are attached to this Complaint as Exhibit 7.
12. As a result of Converse’s long-term, continuous, and substantial use, advertising,
and sales of shoes bearing the Converse Trade Dress, and the widespread publicity and attention
that has been paid to the Converse Trade Dress, the Converse Trade Dress is famous and has
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 4 of 18
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 5/85
acquired
source i
1
and/or a
(the “Inf
1
and/or a
top,” “
footwear
represen
Illu
substantial
entifier of
3. On in
vertises fo
inging Pro
4. On in
vertises th
thletic Lo
products.
ative Infrin
stration 2:
secondary
onverse.
General Al
formation a
twear beari
ucts”).
formation a
Infringing
-top,” “Et
Illustration
ing Produc
xemplary I
A
eaning as
egations –
nd belief,
ng confusi
nd belief,
Products in
letic Chil
2 below
s.
ages of the
tonomie’s I
- 5 -
consumers
utonomie
utonomie s
gly similar
utonomie s
several sty
ren’s Snea
ompares t
Converse T
fringing Pr
Aut
have come
’s Unautho
ells, offers
imitations
ells, offers
es, includi
kers,” and
e Converse
rade Dress (
oducts (righ
nomie Pro
to uniquely
ized Activ
o sell, distr
f the Conv
o sell, distr
g at least it
“Ethletic
Trade Dr
left), Exemp
)
ect’s “Ethl
neakers”
associate i
ties
butes, pro
erse Trade
butes, pro
s “Ethletic
outh Snea
ss to imag
lary Images
etic High-t
as a
otes,
ress
otes,
igh-
kers”
es of
of
p
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 5 of 18
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 6/85
- 6 -
Illustration 2: Exemplary Images of the Converse Trade Dress (left), Exemplary Images of
Autonomie’s Infringing Products (right)
Autonomie Project’s “Ethletic Low-top
Sneakers”
Autonomie Project’s “Ethletic Children’s
Sneakers”
Autonomie Project’s “Ethletic Youth
Sneakers”
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 6 of 18
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 7/85
Illu
1
Autono
Products
1
promote,
1
presiden
Autono
infringe
1
its Infrin
Star sho
the Con
states th
on its w
stration 2:
5. Conv
ie began se
.
6. Conv
or advertis
7. On A
at its bus
ie notice t
he Convers
8. On it
ging Produc
s, which ar
erse Trade
t Autonomi
bsite that i
xemplary I
A
rse used t
lling, offeri
rse has n
the Infring
ugust 31, 2
ness addre
at various
e Trade Dre
website,
ts embody t
e the most
Dress. At
e’s shoes “
s products
ages of the
tonomie’s I
e Converse
g to sell,
ver author
ng Product
12, Conve
s in Mass
shoes Auto
s.
utonomie s
e style of a
rominent a
least one c
re just cop
re the “ne
- 7 -
Converse T
fringing Pr
Outso
Trade Dre
istributing,
zed Auton
.
se mailed
chusetts.
omie was
ates that co
nd/or appea
nd famous
omment fro
ing convers
est incarna
rade Dress (
oducts (righ
e for Auto
Sh
ss extensiv
promoting,
omie to se
cease and
he letter,
romoting,
nsumers ha
r similar to
xample of
m a consu
e chucks st
tion of Con
left), Exemp
)
omie Proj
oe Product
ely and co
or advertisi
ll, offer to
desist lette
attached as
offering to
ve informe
onverse’s
Converse’s
er on Aut
le.” Auto
verse” and
lary Images
ct’s “Ethle
tinuously b
g the Infri
sell, distr
to Autono
Exhibit 8,
sell, and se
Autonomi
huck Tayl
products be
nomie’s w
omie itself
that the “n
of
tic”
efore
ging
bute,
ie’s
gave
lling,
that
r All
aring
bsite
states
mber
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 7 of 18
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 8/85
- 8 -
one” response from consumers when seeing Autonomie’s shoes is that “they look like
[Converse’s] Chuck Taylor’s.” Images from Autonomie’s website evidencing these statements
are attached to this Complaint as Exhibit 9.
19. On information and belief – and as evidenced by the facts and circumstances
alleged above – Autonomie’s infringements have been intentional and willful.
Count I: Trademark Infringement under Section 32(1) of the Lanham Act
(15 U.S.C. § 1114(1))
20. Converse re-alleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 19
above, inclusive, and incorporates them by reference herein.
21. Autonomie’s offers to sell, sale, distribution, promotion, and/or advertisement of
Infringing Products violates Section 32(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1).
22. The Converse Trade Dress is federally registered, and is entitled to protection
under both federal law and common law. The Converse Trade Dress has a distinctive
appearance using unique and non-functional designs. Converse has extensively and continuously
promoted and used the Converse Trade Dress for many decades in the United States and
worldwide. Through that extensive and continuous use, the Converse Trade Dress has become a
famous and well-known indicator of the origin and quality of Converse footwear. The Converse
Trade Dress has also acquired substantial secondary meaning in the marketplace.
23. Trademark Registration No. 1,588,960 has become incontestable and constitutes
conclusive evidence of the validity of trademark and of Converse’s ownership of and exclusive
right to use the trademark.
24. Autonomie’s use of the Converse Trade Dress and of colorable imitations thereof
is likely to cause consumer confusion as to the origin and/or sponsorship/affiliation of the
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 8 of 18
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 9/85
- 9 -
Infringing Products, at least by creating the false and misleading impression that the Infringing
Products are manufactured by, authorized by, or otherwise associated with Converse.
25. Autonomie’s use of the Converse Trade Dress and of colorable imitations thereof
has caused, and unless enjoined, will continue to cause substantial and irreparable injury to
Converse for which Converse has no adequate remedy at law, including at least substantial and
irreparable injury to the goodwill and reputation for quality associated with the Converse Trade
Dress.
26. On information and belief, Autonomie’s use of the Converse Trade Dress and of
colorable imitations thereof has been intentional, willful, and malicious. Autonomie’s bad faith
is evidenced at least by the similarity of the Infringing Products to the Converse Trade Dress, as
demonstrated in Illustration 2 above, by Autonomie’s own admissions on at least its website, and
by Autonomie’s continuing disregard of Converse’s rights after receiving Converse’s cease and
desist letter.
27. Converse is entitled to injunctive relief, and Converse is also entitled to recover
Autonomie’s profits, actual damages, enhanced profits and damages, costs, and reasonable
attorney fees under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, 1116, and 1117.
Count II: False Designation of Origin/Unfair Competition under Section 43(a) of the
Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)
28. Converse re-alleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 27
above, inclusive, and incorporates them by reference herein.
29. Autonomie’s offers to sell, sale, distribution, promotion, and/or advertisement of
Infringing Products, in direct competition with Converse, violates Section 43(a) of the Lanham
Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 9 of 18
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 10/85
- 10 -
30. The Converse Trade Dress is federally registered, and is entitled to protection
under both federal law and common law. The Converse Trade Dress has a distinctive
appearance using unique and non-functional designs. Converse has extensively and continuously
promoted and used the Converse Trade Dress for many decades in the United States and
worldwide. Through that extensive and continuous use, the Converse Trade Dress has become a
famous and well-known indicator of the origin and quality of Converse footwear. The Converse
Trade Dress has also acquired substantial secondary meaning in the marketplace.
31. Trademark Registration No. 1,588,960 has become incontestable and constitutes
conclusive evidence of the validity of trademark and of Converse’s ownership of and exclusive
right to use the trademark.
32. Autonomie’s use of the Converse Trade Dress and of colorable imitations thereof
constitutes a false designation of origin that is likely to cause consumer confusion, mistake, or
deception as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of the Infringing Products by creating the
false and misleading impression that the Infringing Products are manufactured by, authorized by,
or otherwise associated with Converse.
33. Autonomie’s use of the Converse Trade Dress and of colorable imitations thereof
has caused, and unless enjoined, will continue to cause substantial and irreparable injury to
Converse for which Converse has no adequate remedy at law, including at least substantial and
irreparable injury to the goodwill and reputation for quality associated with the Converse Trade
Dress.
34. On information and belief, Autonomie’s use of the Converse Trade Dress and of
colorable imitations thereof has been intentional, willful, and malicious. Autonomie’s bad faith
is evidenced at least by the similarity of the Infringing Products to the Converse Trade Dress, as
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 10 of 18
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 11/85
- 11 -
demonstrated in Illustration 2 above, by Autonomie’s own admissions on at least its website, and
by Autonomie’s continuing disregard of Converse’s rights after receiving Converse’s cease and
desist letter.
35. Converse is entitled to injunctive relief, and Converse is also entitled to recover
Autonomie’s profits, actual damages, enhanced profits and damages, costs, and reasonable
attorney fees under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1125(a), 1116, and 1117.
Count III: Dilution under Section 43(c) of the Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)
36.
Converse re-alleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 35
above, inclusive, and incorporates them by reference herein.
37. Autonomie’s offers to sell, sale, distribution, and/or advertisement of Infringing
Products violates Section 43(c) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c).
38. The Converse Trade Dress is federally registered, and is entitled to protection
under both federal law and common law. The Converse Trade Dress has a distinctive
appearance using unique and non-functional designs. Converse has extensively and continuously
promoted and used the Converse Trade Dress for many decades in the United States and
worldwide. Through that extensive and continuous use, the Converse Trade Dress has become a
famous and well-known indicator of the origin and quality of Converse footwear. The Converse
Trade Dress has also acquired substantial secondary meaning in the marketplace.
39. Trademark Registration No. 1,588,960 has become incontestable and constitutes
conclusive evidence of the validity of trademark and of Converse’s ownership of and exclusive
right to use the trademark.
40. The Converse Trade Dress is famous and has acquired substantial secondary
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 11 of 18
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 12/85
- 12 -
meaning and fame in the marketplace before Autonomie commenced use of its colorable
imitations of the Converse Trade Dress in connection with the Infringing Products.
41. Autonomie’s use of the Converse Trade Dress and of colorable imitations thereof
is likely to cause, and has caused, dilution of the famous Converse Trade Dress at least by
eroding the public’s exclusive identification of the famous Converse Trade Dress with Converse
and by lessening the capacity of the famous Converse Trade Dress to identify and distinguish
Converse footwear.
42. Autonomie’s use of the Converse Trade Dress and of colorable imitations thereof
has caused, and unless enjoined, will continue to cause substantial and irreparable injury to
Converse for which Converse has no adequate remedy at law, including at least substantial and
irreparable injury to the goodwill and reputation for quality associated with the Converse Trade
Dress.
43. On information and belief, Autonomie’s use of the Converse Trade Dress and of
colorable imitations thereof has been intentional, willful, and malicious. Autonomie’s bad faith
is evidenced at least by the similarity of the Infringing Products to the Converse Trade Dress, as
demonstrated in Illustration 2 above, by Autonomie’s own admissions on at least its website, and
by Autonomie’s continuing disregard of Converse’s rights after receiving Converse’s cease and
desist letter.
44. Converse is entitled to injunctive relief, and Converse is also entitled to recover
Autonomie’s profits, actual damages, enhanced profits and damages, costs, and reasonable
attorney fees under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1125(c), 1116, and 1117.
Count IV: Common Law Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition
45. Converse re-alleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 44
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 12 of 18
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 13/85
- 13 -
above, inclusive, and incorporates them by reference herein.
46. Autonomie’s offer to sell, sale, distribution, promotion, or advertisement of
Infringing Products, in direct competition with Converse, constitutes common law trademark
infringement and unfair competition.
47. The Converse Trade Dress is federally registered, and is entitled to protection
under both federal law and common law. The Converse Trade Dress has a distinctive
appearance using unique and non-functional designs. Converse has extensively and continuously
promoted and used the Converse Trade Dress for many decades in the United States and
worldwide. Through that extensive and continuous use, the Converse Trade Dress has become a
famous and well-known indicator of the origin and quality of Converse footwear. The Converse
Trade Dress has also acquired substantial secondary meaning in the marketplace.
48. Autonomie’s use of the Converse Trade Dress and of colorable imitations thereof
is likely to cause consumer confusion as to the origin or sponsorship of the Infringing Products
by creating the false and misleading impression that the Infringing Products are manufactured
by, authorized by, or otherwise associated with Converse.
49. Autonomie’s use of the Converse Trade Dress and of colorable imitations thereof
has caused, and unless enjoined, will continue to cause substantial and irreparable injury to
Converse for which Converse has no adequate remedy at law, including at least substantial and
irreparable injury to the goodwill and reputation for quality associated with the Converse Trade
Dress.
50. On information and belief, Autonomie’s use of the Converse Trade Dress and of
colorable imitations thereof has been intentional, willful, and malicious. Autonomie’s bad faith
is evidenced at least by the similarity of the Infringing Products to the Converse Trade Dress, as
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 13 of 18
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 14/85
- 14 -
demonstrated in Illustration 2 above, by Autonomie’s own admissions on at least its website, and
by Autonomie’s continuing disregard of Converse’s rights after receiving Converse’s cease and
desist letter.
51. Converse is entitled to injunctive relief, and Converse is also entitled to recover
Autonomie’s profits, actual damages, punitive damages, costs, and reasonable attorney fees.
Count V: Dilution under Massachusetts General Law c. 110H
52. Converse re-alleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 51
above, inclusive, and incorporates them by reference herein.
53. Autonomie’s offer to sell, sale, distribution, or advertisement of Infringing
Products, in direct competition with Converse, violates Chapter 110H of Massachusetts General
Law.
54. The Converse Trade Dress is federally registered, and is entitled to protection
under both federal law and common law. The Converse Trade Dress has a distinctive
appearance using unique and non-functional designs. Converse has extensively and continuously
promoted and used the Converse Trade Dress for many decades in the United States and
worldwide. Through that extensive and continuous use, the Converse Trade Dress has become a
famous and well-known indicator of the origin and quality of Converse footwear. The Converse
Trade Dress has also acquired substantial secondary meaning in the marketplace.
55. The Converse Trade Dress is famous and has acquired substantial secondary
meaning in the marketplace long before Autonomie commenced use of its colorable imitations of
the Converse Trade Dress in connection with the Infringing Products.
56. Autonomie’s use of the Converse Trade Dress and of colorable imitations thereof
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 14 of 18
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 15/85
- 15 -
is likely to cause, and has caused, dilution of the famous Converse Trade Dress at least by
eroding the public’s exclusive identification of the famous Converse Trade Dress with Converse
and by lessening the capacity of the famous Converse Trade Dress to identify and distinguish
Converse footwear. Autonomie’s use of the Converse Trade Dress and of colorable imitations
thereof has caused confusion as the source of the Infringing Products by creating the false and
misleading impression that the Infringing Products are manufactured by, authorized by, or
otherwise associated with Converse.
57. Autonomie’s use of the Converse Trade Dress and of colorable imitations thereof
has caused, and unless enjoined, will continue to cause substantial and irreparable injury to
Converse for which Converse has no adequate remedy at law, including at least substantial and
irreparable injury to the goodwill and reputation for quality associated with the Converse Trade
Dress.
58. On information and belief, Autonomie’s use of the Converse Trade Dress and of
colorable imitations thereof has been intentional, willful, and malicious. Autonomie’s bad faith
is evidenced at least by the similarity of the Infringing Products to the Converse Trade Dress, as
demonstrated in Illustration 2 above, by Autonomie’s own admissions on at least its website, and
by Autonomie’s continuing disregard of Converse’s rights after receiving Converse’s cease and
desist letter.
59. Converse is entitled to injunctive relief.
Count VI: Unfair Business Practices under Massachusetts General Law c. 93A
60. Converse re-alleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 59
above, inclusive, and incorporates them by reference herein.
61. Autonomie’s offers to sell, sale, distribution, promotion, and/or advertisement of
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 15 of 18
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 16/85
- 16 -
Infringing Products, in direct competition with Converse, violates Chapter 93A of Massachusetts
General Law.
62. The Converse Trade Dress is federally registered, and is entitled to protection
under both federal law and common law. The Converse Trade Dress has a distinctive
appearance using unique and non-functional designs. Converse has extensively and continuously
promoted and used the Converse Trade Dress for many decades in the United States and
worldwide. Through that extensive and continuous use, the Converse Trade Dress has become a
famous and well-known indicator of the origin and quality of Converse footwear. The Converse
Trade Dress has also acquired substantial secondary meaning in the marketplace.
63. Autonomie’s use of the Converse Trade Dress and of colorable imitations thereof
constitutes a false designation of origin that is likely to cause consumer confusion, mistake, or
deception as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of the Infringing Products by creating the
false and misleading impression that the Infringing Products are manufactured by, authorized by,
or otherwise associated with Converse.
64. Autonomie’s use of the Converse Trade Dress and of colorable imitations thereof
has caused, and unless enjoined, will continue to cause substantial and irreparable injury to
Converse for which Converse has no adequate remedy at law, including at least substantial and
irreparable injury to the goodwill and reputation for quality associated with the Converse Trade
Dress.
65. On information and belief, Autonomie’s use of the Converse Trade Dress and of
colorable imitations thereof has been intentional, willful, and malicious. Autonomie’s bad faith
is evidenced at least by the similarity of the Infringing Products to the Converse Trade Dress, as
demonstrated in Illustration 2 above, by Autonomie’s own admissions on at least its website, and
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 16 of 18
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 17/85
- 17 -
by Autonomie’s continuing disregard of Converse’s rights after receiving Converse’s cease and
desist letter.
66. Converse is entitled to injunctive relief, and Converse is also entitled to recover
actual damages, enhanced damages, costs, and reasonable attorney fees under Chapter 93A of
Massachusetts General Law.
Jury Demand
Converse demands a trial by jury.
Relief Sought
WHEREFORE, Converse respectfully prays for:
A. Judgment that Autonomie has (i) willfully infringed the Converse Trade Dress in
violation of § 1114 of Title 15 in the United States Code, (ii) willfully used false designations of
origin/unfair competition in violation of § 1125(a) of Title 15 in the United States Code, (iii)
willfully diluted the Converse Trade Dress in violation of § 1125(c) of Title 15 in the United
States Code, (iv) willfully infringed the Converse Trade Dress and engaged in unfair competition
in violation of the common law of Massachusetts; (v) willfully diluted the Converse Trade Dress
in violation of Chapter 110H of the Massachusetts General Law; and (iv) willfully engaged in
unfair business practices in violation of Chapter 93A of the Massachusetts General Law.
B. A preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting Autonomie and each of its
agents, employees, servants, attorneys, successors and assigns, and all others in privity or acting
in concert therewith from continuing infringement, false designation of origin, unfair
competition, and dilution of the Converse Trade Dress, including at least from selling, offering to
sell, distributing, or advertising the Infringing Products, or any other products that use a copy,
reproduction, or colorable imitation of the Converse Trade Dress;
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 17 of 18
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 18/85
- 18 -
C. An order directing the destruction of all Infringing Products, or any other products
that use a copy, reproduction, or colorable imitation of the Converse Trade Dress in Autonomie’s
possession or control, including the destruction of all advertising materials related to the
Infringing Products in Autonomie’s possession or control, including on the Internet;
D. An award of Autonomie’s profits, actual damages, enhanced profits and damages,
punitive damages, costs, and reasonable attorney fees for Autonomie’s trademark infringements
and dilution, and acts of unfair competition and unfair business practices; and
E. Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: September 9, 2013 /s/ Erin E. BryanErin E. Bryan (BBO No. 675955)BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.28 State Street, Suite 1800Boston, MA 02109-1705Telephone: (617) 720-9600Facsimile: (617)720-9601ebryan@bannerwitcoff.com
Christopher J. Renk Erik S. Maurer Eric J. HampBANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.10 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 3000Chicago, Illinois 60606Telephone: (312) 463-5000Facsimile: (312) 463-5001crenk@bannerwitcoff.comemaurer@bannerwitcoff.comehamp@bannerwitcoff.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff,Converse Inc.
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 18 of 18
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 19/85
S 44 (Rev. 12/12) CIVIL COVER SHEETThe JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except
rovided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for theurpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)
. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS
(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff County of Residence of First Listed Defendant
(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OFTHE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.
(c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Attorneys (If Known)
I. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an “X” in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an “X” in One Box for
(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant
’ 1 U.S. Government ’ 3 Federal Question PTF DEF PTF D
Plaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party) Citizen of This State ’ 1 ’ 1 Incorporated or Principal Place ’ 4
of Business In This State
’ 2 U.S. Government ’ 4 Diversity Citizen of Another State ’ 2 ’ 2 Incorporated and Principal Place ’ 5
Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) of Business In Another State
Citizen or Subject of a ’ 3 ’ 3 Foreign Nation ’ 6
Foreign Country
V. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an “X” in One Box Only)CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES
’ 110 Insurance PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY ’ 625 Drug Related Seizure ’ 422 Appeal 28 USC 158 ’ 375 False Claims Act
’ 120 Marine ’ 310 Airplane ’ 365 Personal Injury - of Property 21 USC 881 ’ 423 Withdrawal ’ 400 State Reapportionm
’ 130 Miller Act ’ 315 Airplane Product Product Liability ’ 690 Other 28 USC 157 ’ 410 Antitrust
’ 140 Negotiable Instrument Liability ’ 367 Health Care/ ’ 430 Banks and Banking
’ 150 Recovery of Overpayment ’ 320 Assault, Libel & Pharmaceutical PROPERTY RIGHTS ’ 450 Commerce
& Enforcement of Judgment Slander Personal Injury ’ 820 Copyrights ’ 460 Deportation
’ 151 Medicare Act ’ 330 Federal Employers’ Product Liabi lity ’ 830 Patent ’ 470 Racketeer Influence
’ 152 Recovery of Defaulted Liability ’ 368 Asbestos Personal ’ 840 Trademark Corrupt Organizatio
Student Loans ’ 340 Marine Injury Product ’ 480 Consumer Credit
(Excludes Veterans) ’ 345 Marine Product Liability LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY ’ 490 Cable/Sat TV
’ 153 Recovery of Overpayment Liability PERSONAL PROPERTY ’ 710 Fair Labor Standards ’ 861 HIA (1395ff) ’ 850 Securities/Commod
of Veteran’s Benefits ’ 350 Motor Vehicle ’ 370 Other Fraud Act ’ 862 Black Lung (923) Exchange
’ 160 Stockholders’ Suits ’ 355 Motor Vehicle ’ 371 Truth in Lending ’ 720 Labor/Management ’ 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) ’ 890 Other Statutory Acti
’ 190 Other Contract Product Liability ’ 380 Other Personal Relations ’ 864 SSID Title XVI ’ 891 Agricultural Acts
’ 195 Contract Product Liability ’ 360 Other Personal Property Damage ’ 740 Railway Labor Act ’ 865 RSI (405(g)) ’ 893 Environmental Matt
’ 196 Franchise Injury ’ 385 Property Damage ’ 751 Family and Medical ’ 895 Freedom of Informa
’ 362 Personal Injury - Product Liability Leave Act ActMedical Malpractice ’ 790 Other Labor Litigation ’ 896 Arbitration
REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS ’ 791 Employee Retirement FEDERAL TAX SUITS ’ 899 Administrative Proc
’ 210 Land Condemnation ’ 440 Other Civil Rights Habeas Corpus: Income Security Act ’ 870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff Act/Review or Appe
’ 220 Foreclosure ’ 441 Voting ’ 463 Alien Detainee or Defendant) Agency Decision
’ 230 Rent Lease & Ejectment ’ 442 Employment ’ 510 Motions to Vacate ’ 871 IRS—Third Party ’ 950 Constitutionality of
’ 240 Torts to Land ’ 443 Housing/ Sentence 26 USC 7609 State Statutes
’ 245 Tort Product Liability Accommodations ’ 530 General
’ 290 All Other Real Property ’ 445 Amer. w/Disabilities - ’ 535 Death Penalty IMMIGRATION
Employment Other: ’ 462 Naturalization Application’ 446 Amer. w/Disabilities - ’ 540 Mandamus & Other ’ 465 Other Immigration
Other ’ 550 Civil Rights Actions
’ 448 Education ’ 555 Prison Condition
’ 560 Civil Detainee -
Conditions of
Confinement
V. ORIGIN (Place an “X” in One Box Only)
’ 1 OriginalProceeding
’ 2 Removed fromState Court
’ 3 Remanded fromAppellate Court
’ 4 Reinstated or Reopened
’ 5 Transferred fromAnother District(specify)
’ 6 MultidistrictLitigation
VI. CAUSE OF ACTION
Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity):
Brief description of cause:
VII. REQUESTED INCOMPLAINT:
’ CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTIONUNDER RULE 23, F.R.Cv.P.
DEMAND $ CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint
JURY DEMAND: ’ Yes ’ No
VIII. RELATED CASE(S)IF ANY
(See instructions):JUDGE DOCKET NUMBER
DATE SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
RECEIPT # AMOUNT APPLYING IFP JUDGE MAG. JUDGE
Converse Inc.
Essex County, MA
Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.28 State Street, Suite 1800Boston, MA 02109
Autonomie Project, Inc.
15 U.S.C. 1114, et seq., 15 U.S.C. 1125, et seq.
Trademark infringement, false designation of origin/unfair competition, trademark dilution
/9/2013
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 1 of 2
/s/ Erin E. Bryan
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 20/85
JS 44 Reverse (Rev. 12/12)
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44
Authority For Civil Cover Sheet
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filings and service of pleading or other papers as
required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is
required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk o
Court for each civil complaint filed. The attorney filing a case should complete the form as follows:
I.(a) Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, us
only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency andthen the official, giving both name and title.
(b) County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at
time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In lan
condemnation cases, the county of residence of the "defendant" is the location of the tract of land involved.)
(c) Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, no
in this section "(see attachment)".
II. Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "
in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below.
United States plaintiff. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here
United States defendant. (2) When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in this box.
Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendm
to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code tak
precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked.
Diversity of citizenship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the
citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversitycases.)
III. Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark
section for each principal party.
IV. Nature of Suit. Place an "X" in the appropriate box. If the nature of suit cannot be determined, be sure the cause of action, in Section VI below,
sufficient to enable the deputy clerk or the statistical clerk(s) in the Administrative Office to determine the nature of suit. If the cause fits more th
one nature of suit, select the most definitive.
V. Origin. Place an "X" in one of the six boxes.
Original Proceedings. (1) Cases which originate in the United States district courts.
Removed from State Court. (2) Proceedings initiated in state courts may be removed to the district courts under Title 28 U.S.C., Section 1441.
When the petition for removal is granted, check this box.Remanded from Appellate Court. (3) Check this box for cases remanded to the district court for further action. Use the date of remand as the fili
date.
Reinstated or Reopened. (4) Check this box for cases reinstated or reopened in the district court. Use the reopening date as the filing date.
Transferred from Another District. (5) For cases transferred under Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a). Do not use this for within district transfers o
multidistrict litigation transfers.
Multidistrict Litigation. (6) Check this box when a multidistrict case is transferred into the district under authority of Title 28 U.S.C. Section 140
When this box is checked, do not check (5) above.
VI. Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictionstatutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service
VII. Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P.
Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction.
Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded.
VIII. Related Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docket
numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases.
Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-1 Filed 09/09/13 Page 2 of 2
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 21/85
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTDISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
1. Title of case (name of first party on each side only)
2. Category in which the case belongs based upon the numbered nature of suit code listed on the civil cover sheet. (See local
rule 40.1(a)(1)).
I. 410, 441, 470, 535, 830*, 891, 893, 895, R.23, REGARDLESS OF NATURE OF SUIT.
II. 110, 130, 140, 160, 190, 196, 230, 240, 290,320,362, 370, 371, 380, 430, 440, 442, 443, 445, 446, 448, 710, 720,740, 790, 820*, 840*, 850, 870, 871.
III. 120, 150, 151, 152, 153, 195, 210, 220, 245, 310, 315, 330, 340, 345, 350, 355, 360, 365, 367, 368, 375, 385, 400,422, 423, 450, 460, 462, 463, 465, 480, 490, 510, 530, 540, 550, 555, 625, 690, 751, 791, 861-865, 890, 896, 899,
950.
*Also complete AO 120 or AO 121. for patent, trademark or copyright cases.
3. Title and number, if any, of related cases. (See local rule 40.1(g)). If more than one prior related case has been filed in thisdistrict please indicate the title and number of the first filed case in this court.
4. Has a prior action between the same parties and based on the same claim ever been filed in this court?
YES NO
5. Does the complaint in this case question the constitutionality of an act of congress affecting the public interest? (See 28 USC§2403)
YES NO If so, is the U.S.A. or an officer, agent or employee of the U.S. a party?
YES NO
6. Is this case required to be heard and determined by a district court of three judges pursuant to title 28 USC §2284?
YES NO
7. Do all of the parties in this action, excluding governmental agencies of the united states and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (“governmental agencies”), residing in Massachusetts reside in the same division? - (See Local Rule 40.1(d)).
YES NO
A. If yes, in which division do all of the non-governmental parties reside?
Eastern Division Central Division Western Division
B. If no, in which division do the majority of the plaintiffs or the only parties, excluding governmental agencies,residing in Massachusetts reside?
Eastern Division Central Division Western Division
8. If filing a Notice of Removal - are there any motions pending in the state court requiring the attention of this Court? (If yes,
submit a separate sheet identifying the motions)
YES NO
(PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT)
ATTORNEY'S NAME
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE NO.
(CategoryForm12-2011.wpd - 12/2011)
Converse Inc. v. Autonomie Project, Inc.
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Erin E. Bryan (BBO # 675955)
Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., 28 State Street, Suite 1800, Boston, MA 02109
617-720-9600
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-2 Filed 09/09/13 Page 1 of 1
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 22/85
1
EXHIBIT 1
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-3 Filed 09/09/13 Page 1 of 2
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 23/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-3 Filed 09/09/13 Page 2 of 2
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 24/85
1
EXHIBIT 2
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-4 Filed 09/09/13 Page 1 of 2
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 25/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-4 Filed 09/09/13 Page 2 of 2
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 26/85
1
EXHIBIT 3
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-5 Filed 09/09/13 Page 1 of 2
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 27/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-5 Filed 09/09/13 Page 2 of 2
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 28/85
1
EXHIBIT 4
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-6 Filed 09/09/13 Page 1 of 2
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 29/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-6 Filed 09/09/13 Page 2 of 2
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 30/85
1
EXHIBIT 5
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-7 Filed 09/09/13 Page 1 of 6
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 31/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-7 Filed 09/09/13 Page 2 of 6
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 32/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-7 Filed 09/09/13 Page 3 of 6
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 33/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-7 Filed 09/09/13 Page 4 of 6
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 34/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-7 Filed 09/09/13 Page 5 of 6
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 35/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-7 Filed 09/09/13 Page 6 of 6
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 36/85
1
EXHIBIT 6
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 1 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 37/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 2 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 38/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 3 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 39/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 4 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 40/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 5 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 41/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 6 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 42/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 7 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 43/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 8 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 44/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 9 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 45/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 10 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 46/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 11 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 47/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 12 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 48/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 13 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 49/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 14 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 50/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 15 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 51/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 16 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 52/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 17 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 53/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 18 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 54/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 19 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 55/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 20 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 56/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 21 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 57/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 22 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 58/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 23 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 59/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 24 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 60/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 25 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 61/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 26 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 62/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 27 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 63/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 28 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 64/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-8 Filed 09/09/13 Page 29 of 29
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 65/85
1
EXHIBIT 7
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-9 Filed 09/09/13 Page 1 of 7
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 66/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-9 Filed 09/09/13 Page 2 of 7
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 67/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-9 Filed 09/09/13 Page 3 of 7
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 68/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-9 Filed 09/09/13 Page 4 of 7
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 69/85
The ChucksConnection is a website about the Converse All Star "Chuck Taylor" canvas basketball shoe, the classicAmerican sneaker, as seen in films, photographs, and television shows, or described in reviews, articles, and stories aboutwhy people like wearing chucks. Learn all about the lore of chucks and their media buzz. Click on the above shoelace links toaccess our main feature pages.
Purchase shoes, shoelaces, clothing, totebags, books about chucks, or DVDs through our secure online stores. Chucks are foreveryone, and for wear every day. With dozens of models and color combinations available from the classic black high top tothe latest print pattern or seasonal color low cut, it's easy to find that perfect pair for the look you want and the right shoelacesto go with them here at The ChucksConnection.
Purchase Shoelaces For Your Chucks:
Choose From Our Wide Variety of Colors, Lengths, and Styles
Shoelace Guide Shoelace Information
and Tips
Photos of Shoelaces
On Chucks
Classic Athletic
Shoelaces
Fat or Retro
Shoelaces
Print or Special
Shoelaces
Knee Hig
ShoelacesDeck out your chucks in the latest print laces. We now carry skulls, tribal band, camouflage, checkers and star patterns in
different colors and lengths. Click on the print or special shoelaces image link above to order them.
Purchase Converse All Star Chuck Taylor Sneakers:
Get High Top or Low Cut Ox Chucks in Their Most Popular Core Colors
Black Monochrome
Black
Navy Blue Pink Red Optical White Natural White Charcoal Chocolate Gree
The ChucksConnection is pleased to welcome three new affiliate stores. Now your selection o
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-9 Filed 09/09/13 Page 5 of 7
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 70/85
Our shoe selection is better than ever! Check out our newly redone high top and low cut oxford order pages.Click on the high top or low cut oxford links below to see the full selection of chucks available now for back to school. Top of Pag
View PhotosPeople Wearing
High Top Chucks:
Kids Wearing
High Top Chucks:
People Wearing
Low Cut Chucks:
Kids Wearing
Low Cut Chucks:
Go to the menu of allavailable high top
models:
Go to the menu of allavailable low cut
oxford models:
Go to the menu of chucks for little kids,
toddlers, and Infants:
Do you wear a Chuck Taylor men’s size 10, 10.5 or 11 (12, 12.5 or 13women’s)? The ChucksConnection is selling off over sixty pairs of
high tops used for our photo shoots.Go to the Sale Index.
There are also a dozen well worn pairs of high tops available.Well Worn Chucks For Sale.
Top of Page
Purchase Clothing and Accessories:
T-Shirts Sweatshirts Baseball Caps Shorts Socks Team Apparel Totebags
Books and Comics:
Comic St r ip About People
Who Like To Wear Chucks
The Hunter & Holmes
Myster y Seri es
Chucks!The Phenomenon of
Converse ChuckTaylor All Stars
Biography of ChuckTaylor
Follow chucksconnection.com on Facebook.
Secure on-line transactions for this web site are processed by Paypal using the Roman Cart system. We accept PayPal, VisaDiscover, MasterCard, and American Express for these transactions.
Legal Disclaimer. The All Star and Converse names and Chuck Taylor logo are registered trademarks of Converse, Inc. of Nortndover, Massachusetts, USA. They are used on this web site to describe products that the authors have purchased, own and weahe time. These terms, along with the word "chucks", are the familiar names that people use to identify and describe these produThis site is not affiliated with the Converse company in any way, except that we like and use their products, and have some of thcensed products available for sale through our ChucksConnection on-line ordering service and affiliate company Classic Sports ShoOpinions expressed on this site are those of the authors and may not necessarily reflect the official views of The ChucksConnectio
Converse, Inc. or its subsidiary companies. Please note that we are not the Converse Company. To contact the ConverseCompany, go to www.converse.com.
Contact Information: If you have an article or other information about Chuck Taylor shoes to submit to this website, or would lto contact us, our email address is mail@chucksconnection.com. For issues regarding an order from our online store, contac
customerservice@halpeterson.com. To submit photos, email chucksphotos@chucksconnection.com.
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-9 Filed 09/09/13 Page 6 of 7
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 71/85
© 1998-2013 The ChucksConnection, a division of Hal Peterson Media Services.Back to the top of this page.
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-9 Filed 09/09/13 Page 7 of 7
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 72/85
1
EXHIBIT 8
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-10 Filed 09/09/13 Page 1 of 9
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 73/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-10 Filed 09/09/13 Page 2 of 9
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 74/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-10 Filed 09/09/13 Page 3 of 9
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 75/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-10 Filed 09/09/13 Page 4 of 9
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 76/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-10 Filed 09/09/13 Page 5 of 9
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 77/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-10 Filed 09/09/13 Page 6 of 9
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 78/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-10 Filed 09/09/13 Page 7 of 9
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 79/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-10 Filed 09/09/13 Page 8 of 9
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 80/85
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-10 Filed 09/09/13 Page 9 of 9
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 81/85
1
EXHIBIT 9
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-11 Filed 09/09/13 Page 1 of 5
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 82/85
s Chuck Taylor anyway? « Autonomie Project’s Blog
/autonomieproject.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/whos-chuck-taylor-anyway/[11/8/2012 3:59:25 PM]
Ar chi ve d En tr y
Post Date :
April 25, 2008 at 8:15 pm
Category :
Fashion & Shopping
Tags: chuck taylor, converse,
ethletic, pf flyers, sneakers,
sweatshops
Do More :
You can leave a response, ortrackback from your own site.
April 25,2008
Who’ s Ch uc k Ta yl or an yw ay ?Posted by autonomieproject under Fashion & Shopping | Tags: chuck
taylor, converse, ethletic, pf flyers, sneakers, sweatshops |
[6] Comments
So the number one generic response to someone seeing our Ethletic shoes is “Oooooooooo,
they look like Chuck Taylor’s.” Then we SIGH. And say, “Noooooooooo, these are just SO
much better”. After all, Converse’s version of this classic shoe is made in a dirty sweatshop in
China with totally toxic materials. They are, just overall, BAD for our earth.
But curiosity got the best of us and we started to wonder: how did the international phenom of
Converse and their uber popular Chuck Taylor even come into being? A quick search on theinternet solved the mystery.
It all started way back in 1908 (wow!), when Marquis Mills Converse fell down the stairs,
inspiring the Massachusetts entrepreneur (yikes, we’re neighbors!!) to create a non-slip rubber
soled shoe. Thus began the Converse Rubber Shoe Company.
Within a short 2 years, Converse’s new company was selling over 4,000 pairs of shoes a day
(sorry, but we must insert here shameless plug to buy Ethletics). In 1915, the company
produced their first athletic shoe made for tennis, and in 1917, the Converse All-Star as we
know it today was born. ( Damn...so when we say classic, we really really mean classic! This
shoe is 100 years old!).
The shoes were actually not that popular. But then this seemingly awkward basketball player
named Charles H. Taylor came to Converse complaining of sore feet.
With his new comfy basketball boots on, Chuck Taylor became the ambassador for Converse,
selling and promoting the shoes all the way to 1969.
Home About Us
Follow “Autonomie
Project's Blog”
Follow
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-11 Filed 09/09/13 Page 2 of 5
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 83/85
s Chuck Taylor anyway? « Autonomie Project’s Blog
/autonomieproject.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/whos-chuck-taylor-anyway/[11/8/2012 3:59:25 PM]
In 1966, basketball teams and their fans got fed up
with the traditional red high- top and demanded that more colors and styles be produced sothat they could wear their team colors.
Of course though, like every small business, not everything remained so peachy keen. From the
1970′s on, Converse started to feel the heat from new competitors like Adidas, Nike and
Reebok. They were all of sudden ripped of their title as the preferred shoe for the National
Basketball Association (they are after all not that comfortable or even remotedly suited for
today’s game).
The company filed for bankruptcy in January of 2001. At that same time, they closed their
very last USA factory and went offshore to China (yes, it’s time for a collective sob). In 2003,
the company sold for $305 million (so much for bankruptcy) to their rival (and just overall evil
corporation) Nike. While Nike has certainly revitalized the brand and made sure that every
youth in the entire world is wearing a pair of Converse, they also decreased the quality of theshoes (namely using low-grade totally fake rubber and switching from 2-ply canvas to 1 -ply
“textile” – whatever that is). And let’s not even go into the laundry list of human rights and
sweatshop abuses the company is infamous for.
Now a fashion brand much more so than a sports brand, Converse has inspired all kinds of
knock-offs, such as PF Flyers, which are surprisingly still in existence and owned by New
Balance. They also interestingly lay claim to be the original American sneaker brand (although
they debuted much later in 1937), as well as creating the “breakthrough” low-top courtesy of
yet another old timer “basketball legend” Bob Cousy. Somehow, “Cousies” just don’t ring like
“Chucks”!
We at Autonomie of course prefer the newest incarnation of Converse: our ultra-cute, ultra-
ethical, ultra-eco, truly one of kind Ethletics!
But if you have one of the old-school, made-in- the-USA Chucks (that are probably at this
point totally falling a part), share your story and post a photo of the shoes under comments!
6 RESPONSES TO “WHO’S CHUCK TAYLOR ANYWAY? ”
Be the first to like this.
Get every new post delivered
to your Inbox.
J oin 41 other followers
Powered by WordPress.com
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-11 Filed 09/09/13 Page 3 of 5
Enter your email address
Sign me up
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 84/85
s Chuck Taylor anyway? « Autonomie Project’s Blog
/autonomieproject.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/whos-chuck-taylor-anyway/[11/8/2012 3:59:25 PM]
1. Leslie @ the oko box Says:
April 26, 2008 at 7:34 am
Chuck Taylors were the only shoes I’d wear in highschool- i happened to
live next to a Chuck Taylor outlet store in New Orleans that was liquidating
all the funky colors no one wanted to buy back then… so needless to say I
owned purple, brown, paprika, white, light blue and pink Converse! I
didn’t wear them for too long after highschool( cause i wore the soles to
nothing on every pair), but when i pulled a pair back out and wore it
downtown Asheville NC about 3 or 4 years ago a group of kids stopped me
on the street And were like ” Oooh Your Bo Bo’s are REAL, they the real
thang, those are OLD!” Yeah, sort of- ehem. All my Converse are no
longer, all worn into complete obliteration. Can’t wait to sport my new
classic Ethletics and see what the kids have to say now.
Think Ya’ll may ever make pink ones?
Reply
2. To a Socially-Conscious, Sustainable Dad… « Autonomie Project’s Blog Says:
June 13, 2008 at 10:09 am
[...] school days when he used to sport Chuck Taylors. Now, of course,
make sure Dad’s aware that Chucks aren’t what they used to be and he
should always look for the ethical [...]
Reply
3. anonymous Says:
November 1, 2008 at 9:35 pm
what are you talking about>?! Chuck Taylor is a complete LEGEND!!! andconverse chucks are the real deal, your shoes are just copying converse
chucks style and if your shoes so good why did you make them look like
chucks? get your own design and stop bad mouthing converse chucks and
Chuck Taylor.
Reply
4. AAID Says:
March 9, 2009 at 12:07 pm
I am really after a pair of these, but does anyone notice the pricescreeping up? Why is this?
Reply
5. Penny Kubis Says:
April 13, 2010 at 6:15 pm
Hi, i just thought i’d post additionally let you know your blogs layout
usually genuinely messed up on distinct K-Melon browser. Anyhow retain
up special good work.
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-11 Filed 09/09/13 Page 4 of 5
7/29/2019 Converse v. Autonomie Project - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/converse-v-autonomie-project-complaint 85/85
s Chuck Taylor anyway? « Autonomie Project’s Blog
Blog at WordPress.com. — Theme: Connections by www.vanillamist.com.
Reply
6. clark Says:
May 23, 2011 at 7:18 pm
the chucks made in china fall apart way to easily.
Reply
LEAVE A REPLY
Enter your comment here...
Case 1:13-cv-12220 Document 1-11 Filed 09/09/13 Page 5 of 5
top related