control of sleep-to-wake transitions

Control of Sleep-to-Wake Transitions

fast aminoacid vs slow neuropeptide

Thiago S MosqueiroPhD candidate

BioCircuits Institute, UCSD (USA) Institute of Physics of São Carlos, USP (BR)

08/28/2014

thmosqueiro.vandroiy.com

Courtesy of Milena Carvalho

Take-home message

3

GABA

HCRT

LC

INP

GABAA is not sufficient to control bursts of

LC activity

Mosqueiro, de Lecea & Huerta New Journal of Physics, v16 p115010

Take-home message

3

GABA

HCRT

LC

INP

GABAA is not sufficient to control bursts of

LC activity

An Inhibitory Neuropeptide could implement this

control very well

Mosqueiro, de Lecea & Huerta New Journal of Physics, v16 p115010

Summary

• Previous research on Hypocrexin (HCRT) and Locus Coeruleus (LC)

• Modeling neural populations with conduction models

• GABAA-induced excitation (?)

• Control of LC activity through a slow neuropeptide

• Concluding remarks and ideas

4

PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS

Locus Coeruleus (LC)

6

Scammell & Saper `2007 Nat Med

Carter et al `2010 Nat Neurosci.

…and Hypothalamus

7

Carter et al `2012 PNAS

HCRT-mediated wake transition

8

Carter et al `2012 PNAS

The LC relays the sleep-to-wake transition

message from HCRT

MODELING

Compartmental model

10

Hindmarsh & Serban `2007 Scholarpedia

CVODE

Compartmental model

10

Hindmarsh & Serban `2007 Scholarpedia

CVODE

GABAA model

11

Cl-Cl-

PostsynapticPresynaptic

Populations

• Each population has 20 neurons in most simulations

12

GABAGABAA

HCRT

LC

AMPAHCRT

AMPA

1.0

1.0

0.5

0.5

0.5

Hyphotalamus

sublateraldorsal periLC

brainstem

HCRT Excitation Protocol

13

-55

-50

-45

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

50 60 70 80 90 100 110

V (

mV

)

t (s)

HCRTLCIdc

0

5

10

15

50 60 70 80 90 100 110

F (

Hz)

t (s)

HCRTGABA

LC

LC

HCRT

GABA

GABAA-inducedEXCITATION

Varying GABA Conductance

• Hypothesis: GABA hold back LC

• IPSP generated by GABAA in a LC cell

• Amplitude ~ 0. - 4. mV

15

-60

-40

-20

0

20

9.0

V (

mV

)

t (s)Varying GABAA conductance

Suppress overloads of LC activity

16

0

5

10

15

gGABA = 800nS

HCRTGABA

LC

0

5

10

15

gGABA = 200nS

0

5

10

15

65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

F (

Hz)

t (s)

gGABA = 0nS

17

0

5

10

15

20

50 75 100 125 150

F (

Hz)

t (s)

10

15

20

25

30

102 103

F (

Hz)

gGABA (a.u.)

GABALC

GABA is increasing the LC firing frequency!Changing the number of GABA neurons won’t change anything

Assessing the asymptotic firing frequency…

SLOW NEUROPEPTIDE

Inhibitory Neuropeptide (INP)

19

Since GABAA cannot control LC activity,would a Inhibitory Neuropeptide be able to?GABA

HCRT

LC

INP Feedback from LC: overload of activity means more inhibition

HCRT is the gauge:Both LC and INP activities are basically triggered by HCRTs

INP model ~~ HCRT

Activity With INP group

Also…

i. A faster rise up of activity on the onset of HCRT activation

ii. LC activity dies out faster when HCRT stimulation stops…

LC activity successfully decreased

20

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

50 60 70 80 90 100 110

V (

mV

)

t (s)

HCRTLCIdc

0

5

10

0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1 0.11

F (

Hz)

t (s)

HCRTINPLC

INP seems to increase the precision of LC activity as well

Activity With INP group

Also…

i. A faster rise up of activity on the onset of HCRT activation

ii. LC activity dies out faster when HCRT stimulation stops…

LC activity successfully decreased

20

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

50 60 70 80 90 100 110

V (

mV

)

t (s)

HCRTLCIdc

0

5

10

0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1 0.11

F (

Hz)

t (s)

HCRTINPLC

INP seems to increase the precision of LC activity as well

-55

-50

-45

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

50 60 70 80 90 100 110

V (

mV

)

t (s)

HCRTLCIdc

0

5

10

15

50 60 70 80 90 100 110

F (

Hz)

t (s)

HCRTGABA

LC

LC

HCRT

GABA

Synaptic input + Frequency

21

INP time scale does not need to match exactly HCRT’s

LC

HCRT

INP

-10

0

10

20

30

40

80 100

I (p

A)

t (s)

HCRTINP

INP+HCRT

5

10

15

20

0 100 200 300

F (

Hz)

g (kS)

INPLC

INP activity decreases as LC is requesting less inhibition

CONCLUDINGREMARKS

Concluding remarks

✓ We have modeled two possible mechanisms of LC activity regulation

✓ At least the LC model fitted before is not controlled

✓ A slow and inhibitory neuropeptide is capable

✓ Possibilities for this inhibitory neuropeptide: MCH and opioids

✓ Questions:Should we search for such neuropeptide? How?

23

of controlling LC activity with unexpected precision

by GABAA inhibition

Secondary remarks…

• GABAA-slow is capable of suppressing overloads of LC activity, but…

• it cannot control LC activity as well as we have shown with INP

• Also, it’s not likely to have GABAA-slow from thephysiological point of view…

24

Thanks for your attention :)