arthashastra in sanskrit

8/21/2019 Arthashastra in Sanskrit

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arthashastra-in-sanskrit 1/397

I' KKFA

This is tin MX OIK I pnfr of tlio Artha^astia of Kautal>a,iiiwhuh aie m< ludod the ne^t fave ArihiLaianas

only,in

oid< ) thai it miy bi ccjnal in si^o to the fiist

When this volume was ibout io be published, a cupj of

I)i rl olio's edition, ol the Aithibistia pnbhbhed at Lahore,umio to hand, tht itudmo^ ol \vhuh, is well as of the

M>soio cdilioti, is (onipuod with those of: the Tuvandmuni'<htion, will }>o I^IACU <)s an appendix to the thud part

Di 'K>ll)'s uitioductLoii deals with many (j^nestious con-

nictc<l with the \voik NVe bh\U coiisulei some ofliib

aigu-inonts 3n siip)>oit of Ins thoonofe, as T,lftO of others utuiodto

the closin \eise of the hr^L

li<nn th< closing vris< <>I HH^ Lonbh diaptn oi

^*l<$ \\

*Hid iioni the* tv\o st iu/as t tli( fc end of the woi k,

a-* w< li is iiom UK i Kl thit quotations <ited nudci tlie mint

of K iiifolyi 01 Kant illya me all found in tlu woik it i^ctuiU-

piopci (h if it should bo itiidod as tho pioductioiiof Ch i-

nak> i tins Visluiuoupta, .1 coutem]v^iai\ oi Chandia&upta

Mmiva Hut Dih Wint 01 nit/, Jolly uul KciUi, hola tint

Uio AiilLioastni \\.isnuttlie ]nod IK 1 1011 of a poison naine<i

K lut ilya, a contenipoian of lliandia^upta Maa^a, on the

followin jj

(i) noieieienci is made in the \\oik to the gi cat

( mpiio oi ('luuicli iupU, A\huli 3^ *>a<l to hive been built up

b> Ch in.ik\M (Di \Vinloinits5), noi is the name Pltdijmtia

tlio capitaloi tin <mpn<>, imiilion <^ (Di Tolly )i

(n) the theone-* propounded lefei i ither to the

gcvseinance o a numbei of small independent stiles than oi

a great empuo like tljat ot Chandiagupta, (Di \VmteimU)

(111) nogioat person

namedIvairtaly^

did t/\st

dining the time ot Chandiagupta Maiuya, as ho is not nuntioned by Megasthones, (Di .foil}),

(iv) the poison lefened to frequently ib Kantal>a,is not the author, because, the opinion of Kautah i in theoouisc ot the discussion of imnistenil usuipxtion, dealt withm the si\th chapter of the Yogaviitta Adhikiiam v- cimci&od b> Bhaiadva^a, and, it is impossible, if Kintal \ ^ ai

the authoi of the work, that his opinion would be 01 .ticisul

byapievious Achaiya, (Di Keith),

(v) the \\oid K.atitilya meaning a& it does fxlst-

hKxl md hypoci ifey could not pob&ibl> have been idoj>ted a*-

the name of the famous mimstei of Ohiudiagtiptt (Dis kcitli

Let ab iiryw consider these aiguments

With iejt>a,id to the firbt, it m^y be said that the authoi

could have icferied to the empue of his o\vn making, cithei

(n) in the eouisc* ot the \\oik, aa an illustration,01

tlie beginning or end ot the \voil., when ht. mates himself

Iviiowii Ol the-so two positions, the fiist is not po-^ibk , foi,

in a jeneril tieatise on the science of pohty it is but propei

tor an authoi to quote as authoi it> the go\emmeiit ot

aiicitsnt kings well known to Itihasas, instead ot the one ot

his own making, lest he should be deemed as pinsuiq hitn-

scH. As tor the second, the authoi can be siid to tefei to

the empiie of Chandragvipte, when he sijs at the ond ot ^

111 the sloka,

tlmt tliat person is the author of the ^oik, Mho pulled do\\n

theempae of the Nandas from thib it maybe infeiied

that reteience is also uciade to the place \\heie he lived, vi/

Patahputra It \vill be noted here that the authoi ue\ei

tails to make mention of towns and cities, whenever he fmds

neces&ity to do so, as *vhen he speaka of Magadha, Mathma,

etc as the sourceb o silk, cotton^nnd other good* If

Pata-hputia Jb not mentioned m the courffe of the work, Jt i*.

because there is no context for it,

The beeond argument is not conclusne The them a*,

of go\ eminent debCiibed ue a& mu<h applicable to ^ i>it it

empire ae> to bmall and independent states Bt sides th

authoi dwells ebpecjaliy on the mutual duties ot empeiot and

bubject kings 111 the fifteenth and sixteenth chapteis oi thebovcnth Adhikaiana

Tho thiid aigument cannot be accepted How c^i tlic

iceold ot Mogasthenes which i* admittedly a miactuie of ie.t?

xn<l imumaiy statements, be an arithoiit\ on a sulrjtxi

\vhuh itself is not mentioned therein? Gianting that Mts--btheuo-> knew ot Kautal\a, it does not neccs-*aiil\ follow thai

ho should have mentioned that name m his record- If i-

]ossiblci that Megabtheiies canie to Indi\ niaaj 3 ens itu i

the d< ith oi Kautaija whou Chandragupta wa- m tull hi eitv

ami when the events connected \\ith the name oi KautiU v

begin to tade .rwajr fiom the memoiv of the Mibjtt>-.

Again, he might ha\e heaid o KautaH x fiom meie lit u-ry

an<i be/ause he did not know much o him he might not lia^e

4aied to sty anything icgaidmg him

Thus the probabilities bemg moic foi not mennoiunu

tlu name ot Kautal>a by Me^asthenes, ho\\ can it be slid

that the mighty Kautalyi -\\ho is kno^n to tame toi Thou-

KUi<ls of \oais and ^ hose exploits aie recorded in the > i-

shnu Vayu and othei authontative Putanas did not exist

chum the time of Chandiagupta^ Di folU's aiguments

l.a as it based on the account* of Magabthenes is tantamourt

to saying that, m solving problems concerning Indian anti-

uuiiiob even the siloiiceof Megasthenes is to be icguded i- *>

Dicce ot eMdenee It further implies an utter disiegiid ot

su<li eiHincut authoiitieb -ih the Yishrw Purani YSju

Guiana, Kam mdaklya NItisaia etc

TJrc tourtlr argument is not correct Foi Kautaha

not ti ilicistdheie

byBharadv3>i is said b> Bi K>th it

s usiwl tol enters either to htate first the MO^S o c.thei-

and the reasons therefoi and tlren to criticise and estrb ish

tl eu Avn VIO^VH, 01 to state then o*n^iews

fiibt, anOL then

o t.ose the views ot others It is the latter method that to

tosol Jed to here by the author The pur poitof the passage,

t fvr>rn *u dJ)*j*'ff H*41^ NiK^fc'^t ^Atfff* an I ending

,. -Tu 'M^^q^qfifo^&fcifia*' %?rt^^^ 'lb thl^

,on battle minibter shall make the pimce assume the

of evils as it exute^ the anei ol tin people and is untight

eous and uncei tarn of success (Vide baiibkiit mtioduction

foi a fullei discus&ion)

Thefifth

aigunumti* not convincing The iniiit

Kautilja though a bad one miht ha\e Ixen dei rvcd like

the name Kautsa an stated by Pi of K \ lluu>a*\ami

fceugai m ms additional notes on Coiisidu atioiih on some

aspects of Ancient Indian Polity In. Lict, the \\oid

Kantilya (ifoHX^M) J<3 a mistake handed <ln\m to us by M-iibes

and icadcis All the ancient manuscripts of. the tevt and

the coramentai ie& of the Aithibafttia, avail \bio hole, uad

thiougliout as Kautalva (STPR*TWT), -md not -is Kautiha

Kutalai& the name ot a Rifehi who iounded the Kut.aU (iod *

and an> descendant of that Goli i ma> be called Kaudilya

This i& thp icason why the antlioi ofc Jayjmino.tU, a com-

mentary on the Nitibajut oi Kani mdaka obbCi ves ihal Kaut.il

ya i& the name given to the authoi ot the ArtUa&ILhtia aiUi

his Gotia, Kutala A tew othci detaila le^aidino the name

aie given 111 the mtioductioii to the fu&t \olunie

Thus are lefutcd the contentions that L tlie time <>i

Cliandiagupta Manrya a gi eat man ii.unod Kaui ilyi ncvt i

o isted and that the extant Aitlia2.KUa could no h i\( bee nwiitten b^ a contempoiaiy of Cliandiagupla \\ e IIJM now

ariivod at the conclusion that the Aith isash i wisunUtn

by a contcmpoiary of Ch.ndiaiii]>la Mamya, \\huh ilw>

makes definite the dale claimc<l loi it -yi/, ith cen(tu\

B CWe hh.iH now turn to a f< \\ minoi points which in ihe

opinion of: Di Jolly and orhei s aic i eluded is inoonsisluii

with the eail} date aa&igiu d to it,

1 The numbci of chemical subsiaiiM^ m< ntionod in

the Aithas3.stiti beni> laifjei than th<it in Siioi ma md olhei

A\oiks of the kind points Lo a later si ijcof (In <U \elopmcn1 of

the science of chemistiy at ilio time of K,iu< ily i f h in il, the

time of SuSmt^i and thu testifies to felu jKMeiioi it\ of flu

Artha^astia (Wmteimt/) J3ut this is an un\\arianf( d in

fcieucc It is (|iutc pofobible that at Liu tmu tliescmi hidattained an advanced stage, Suatuta dealt \vith only a small

iiumbei of chomicalp, because lus >\as a

piud>medic il

jyork,admitting mention of such substances only is \\ c 10 ic K \awt <<

thcfiubject. But the Aithabantin i*> not limited in Mope. If

conceiiis it&elf with a vau&l> <rf subjects su<h as the in.una-

of gold and othei prccious'mctalh, tht i>Jepdi*itiou

oi[KMbojn

etc,nid consequently it leitis to a

iijoodminitxl*

of chciuK \\ substances But in tho DhatuLmtall^a* and

snmlai Oihu woiks on chumsti} one might expect an

exhaustive tieitnient of chemicals What follows horn this

is, the extent of the mentioning ot chemical substances whci( vei ncccssu^ in a woik that deals pinnarily withothoi sub-

jects< innot h> itself bo made the basib 01 fixing the ase o^

tint woik

2 The Aitlubastia o Kautal)a, isa>s Di Jolly, has

Lately boiiowod Fiom the YS]iu\alk)abmuti, and as the date

oi Uielattoi is latei than the 3idcentm> A T) ,the Aitha^ahti )

should h ivo come atei it This i& not eoirect, Foi then

is no evidence to sliovv th<ibthc Ya]iia\alk\asmnti is l.jtei

than tho thud un tuiy A D On the oontuty, tho daleof

Kautalya having been fixed nh Uhcentuiy^B

C it natui<illy

follows that Yi]nttvalk> i,hoin whom Kautal>a has hoi

lowed, should be antei 101 to the lattei What is logically

hiieimnot be contiadu ted by an apjuiont alignment

Besiden the \\oid Yajnavalka is mentioned m the G<u^idi-

jraiici (Wi%;

noT) undci tho sutiauTpTTf%wfl

^f oi Panim II

is cle<u from this that Panini knew ol i Yajnavalk><i bom>( the Yajru\ ilka Gotia Piolxibly the same Ya]navalk^a

uas the authoi oithe

Smutiand theicloie eaibci than

r3 Di K< ilh is <jt opinion that the use of conect Tri-

shtup slan/as in iei>ulai metie a-, ionnd in the Aithabasli

is noi, in ia\oui oi its c-uly d<ito and Hut the language* ot tho

vvoikisnot hulluiently auhaic J t may be^asked which is

unsuitable lo tho antiquity the useol rneic* Tnshfupbtan/anol the (oiiectnc^^ aiul le^ulaiitv of the fom hnch^ What

e\ei it ih,tluii is no SQI t ol msdietion m tho case ol i non

\edi< \\oik Thouftli(o Di

Keith,the

languagedoes not

look u<hii(, to me it does look dide<Uy auhoic, inoic

uduic thai the Malubbaslna ot Patanjali uid himilai otlui

\\oiks The niatki nw> A\cllbo l<fc

lt to the judiimnt oi

Sahiida) is

1 An >lher ^rholai thinks (hit the ArlLiNasttM, <ON<I

ing a- it does, stveial blanches ol htunan knowled^i coulci

not possiblybe Iho ]aodu<tioii ol a HingU* authoi, bill a <oin-

position hy sevoi il auihois. The following stateincnt ol

Kanmndakaat the beginning ol his

VtflomUu'luclJiou to tin last pail p I0t

lca\<.s no loom ioi doubt on this mattci JI< n Kuumdikiis(iilxs the \\oik lo Vislmucfiiptn aftei likening him t<> (iod

Biilnn in niiespe<t of his IXMHI; a sec i -UK .111 nil hoi ol

Aciijou^ sriemes The date of Klin uidaki is s ncl tc> I>< flu

1st < out UL \ B C,and ho can ccitunlj becudidd \\itli 11101*

<KCUI itc uid icli iblc knowledoo il>out K iuMl>i (h in \M ol

UK piosuii dr> Whitcvti inu be tlu dale of Kuunidaki

it us fitciiu that he \\a^ i<u anteimi <o the poet I>hi\ ibhuli

It i^ Iti^itnnato to sin nnsc lioni the JVIcilalTm uili iv i thi(

Uhavcibliuti \\a^ (omei^iut \\ith th< NTlitsai i of K t-

k L a> lie thouolit it fi1 to cfi\o the n nn< K tiu,in<l ika

Iraditioii d SCUM ol ^hich is ioshulcd to llu iiithoi of

i i to a kin dt* isu tit ill his j\l<t,l itiiu i<lh i\a v\ ho i^

dts<ii])c<l is })Lohcui)t in tlu* dit oi (hj)loin u*\ Tsoi i^

l\ Tin indakJ*

*ni ac<irlcti<a uid lunuiMiiiii^ n inu jj;iv<n bv

tlu IMH t \\ ithout 1113?cf(Kiu< to UK c htii i t< i i- h< ^ <l th<

<uilhoi ol tl)i NTd^ij L ^ f>) I<1 \ thinks, ioi, ill th< < In

lactcis in the M ll.itTni dh i\ t >i< X1%M1 ^I;*H|U inf ind

<ipl>io])ilaU nMinos Th< nanic^ M ilitT uid M i<lh i\ i \\Iiuh

tic excitants oi pt nii^tiiu IN i n< fc

<jinf<^in( d>I< lo I ho h< num

and hue* A^hoj iu;haiit i ind vi)>

il ikuud t'a I ind loi

tlu* ti i ultlc \\OI^IIIJ>JK is oi (1

h<Linun<lT, \\lnh I>udd tiMl ^Inl i

and A\ ilokH i Kpiosciti llu d i -M pits o( t i< f>u<ldbi^t iiiin

Thus \\hcn dl fix IMIIH s of t h< <hni(t<i^ u ^i'j nitn ml, it

is noi itMsou ihli* toit^ixl tlu n inu Kiinindtki doin -

iinmoannii* ind ax <*id< nt d bk< Ditthi (TTT^) Ktul'ui no

one need doulrf \vh<*lh< fc

i t in i^t(*i \ in ^o in m\ hi NU >f

kilo\\kdLc i ouM c\ < i b< mi i \\ uh in <>iM h pidi\ id'i d 'H < 4 uisi%

\\l)cn it is <

|into possible tint i IMI^OH tiiitMl \vilh in inJ< 1

lotto \^Li) hiohoid(i in i\ bi<onu ^i^ari1 ^ 1^ it is not it dl

\\oiidu d he itluns ni<isici> OV<M ininnb<t oi ^nbj(<f\\itli

\\lnt vsc 3it\c ^ndii>o\( di^pri>\ < -* ilu O >M i \ ihon of

JolJ\9

that the ^\lio'( \\oik i- hkcJ\ lo ha\t IwcH

composed by a sinole peison, piobibly a Pandit belonging to

i school of polity and law, who to icudoi a div ^nbject intci-

istiiigy intioduccd debates in which tho Pui vuuksha js putin tlu month of eminent ^igts oJ of deities \vho^< names ho

i>ot hoin the Mahabharata 01 fiom tiadition* \\hilo thn

(Jtliiapakbka 01 hiddhaijita is iesa\cd loi Kautalx i , in as

11 uch as the evidences huinshed by Kainmdakt ind o^Iia

eminent wntcis in biippoit oi the asciiption oi Ihe intlioi-

lup of the* Aitln&astiti to Kautalya no still exutnt Ih, Joll>

s to think that theie \\cic it ill > no A\ oiks composed b>iiciont AchdA>cis Biiaradvaja, Paiasaia, Visllaksha, Bnh i-

,which can be ie^at<lcul as the souiccsol tho &o\< ial

Pakshas a^riibod to them in the Aithisastia Butweluuo*cen ni the commeiitaiy on tJtie Yai]iiavilkyasimiti 1)^

\ ibva-

iupaehai>a, the illnfctuous piedeccsshoi oi Vi)iia.iicav ua lon^

exti K fcs horn the AiHiasdstia oi Buhcispati and Vih3laJksUi

(T S SoiiebNo 74, pp 184, 188 and <)()), mditisiliai

theieioic th<it the Aithisastia oi Bulhispiti and V^al iksh i

must have oxifetod durnii; the tune o \ isvaiuj)arhli>a Ju

like inannoi, it can l>c ini'eiied tint the woiks ol Bliaiaclv tji

and <>tli(*t Achiliyis, \\ho irt incnLiomd in tlu* Aitlusa >ti i

with Bnhaspiti ujd VibSlakhhti niiibl huo OIK exist

but disij>])eait

ho I 11 vvt have considoied in derail thi elm I opinion** ol

I)j Jolly ind otlioib Ono moio si lUmcnL ol I)i, Jolly his

to bo (xunined. It is thai loi the* Aiihasfisda Ihon* \v is i

^uiiikxn<w

hcU ijLn<i Tintia* (WRT5TrF5r) which \v is hitlidto un-

kiumn Midba-tithi in his corrmic nlaiy <w th<* J91sl loka

in lh(fc

nih chiptoi ol the M.uiusninti cjiioti^ Ihe \ois< g

^ vrg^r^ \\luchis lound in the filth ch tpioi oHli( tiilli

V<lhiknain of tho Aithas<ls(ii ol K mtil>

i uid in t iodines tlu

t ttion by s lyuu; ^WHd*Jl'OliTfe^ Simihilv on iho 20K>tli

a 111 lllO SUUO dllptOl, lKM|UOlOS 't'cf . *TT-

r' \\lnch is an id >t ition <>l tho s< ntonrc

ft ^& ^foR srmft* lound in the scron< rhiptu of tho

si\th Adhikaifina9and intioduces this quol ition

l>> stvino,

From this Dr Jolly coiuludes llwt the Aiiha-

slsti<i wis sunumod Saminatantia, and ilso si\^ tint since

tho }>hi ises *f% WTR i$Pt'f

$fa ^44H^ alo lound to oui nithe* hist (haptei of the filth Adhikaiana m<l in nnny oth< i

pi ins this name is quite appioixiato to tho \\oik But tins

is obviously vvioiig SainAiit tntia is \ Kuniulhliaji coin-

pound \\oid \\huli should fw* splitis ^WR ^ rT?r T^ ^r uul

another Sasiia on the same

subject

What is con-

veyedm wiMd'WtWt ib that the

topicundei j cieienee is

also dealt with in anothet eastia on the t>uiirsubject

is, mlact the Aitha&tu olKautal}.i

The woul

ib bund not

McdhSWhi,bat ,dso in the Nuustttn cH] lutinu

Ilh inuxpicssion puiMoulv

comment u ics on s,utns ^hen anothei iisln h ntcd

lutkmtyOn no

^loundi in u lie sud ihil Ailhisisd.i i

nic.intby

thit MOK Itmi)

hoc bo noiul tlul in UK b i

sti.iic'ftoiks thcfct.uiRl(jen(( ol ,i suiuiunt IIMH onepi

to \nothu *fa is uiduitulby

\iinoiisplniys

siwr1 (

$f ^i''W' All

pluiscs.tic

synonymousand tin IK ol my ol I IK mi

(oininon lo ill

Tiivandiuni,

17th Miv 1924

i c[^r tBIST

*T5% I

^ *m%ftra

aerator i *;

WTFS; WI^TO fcifoft

ggrrowr

srf% g* (

ftwft. I ft* r?r

. ^^i; ii

itNr* t-MNi-

w. i ?

^ $raftwf l w SWRF sijfl w$$ ^j w(N

wpiw',(

VIM II

fatrfll^ <H* ^iW

*nf^r4|U4||4|'

* * 1 51

b^TT'JIH

> 1 11

too 9 ^oo

U 3ft: II

, 'ft^ft 'n't

100D IJ

rcr., ^<?f^i>cr

i r|'TRr g

^i srnr

ar., nrro , qft

53*^(01^

teir t

g sr^Er^i u

ffcr n

wmrir awrrefr wt&tft

I V,R ,

i ft^rac

i 'ill

-ni^ Pf

. H-'inw WH wn i

infer: rn. ^*1 *v- ** wwwfWN: i

^TTTR^T^J I

1% ^^if^rw^st , ^rc ^'^^r ST^TOT*^ st% i

5tT3T'WiRr JTl^r:

ft(5tftrgngf T 3 ?wiWr ft^ft

TO3R.,- II

fr% snw i 5^-4

^u} fqrfflf?

'A* ] v. STP

ra T km,

TT i%f%gi

-iT TN-T

s i % ^KN?n: ,

, jfr ^^ftf^r,

ff*r grscr ^reft ft*r I sprwi ft fliRTt

^TT ^TT^T^rTST^y f '^TOWt 'J^t I f

^, SpfTff SSf

I src i

STT <rr%: li

^T -HI

\\? qq t( 7

, sfitisft ^rr T^r ^r, m%., v^rm. u

PWrcwrt ^ ww i v

HI-OTW

TWT^TT^ I

n fH^^rr^r^r ^^^rf *r*?fr ^rrTHw^ ^r^ ^rr

?rt?r,

5jvir err

___$ l\ I, * ^

-ft sn'

I^rr ?rr:

*iwro* sr- s**w i

^TT T^?c n^ ' ^jT^^fJ I ff^T

5* wtaili rort ritfft

TOT: II

ft^*?*: ftraftpngro: 5^1: 1

^i?TCT

:, ^g:J %f% ^^T^OT^ I B

%gt 5*

, 5311:

I apmt

frvrtr

ftrwir ^n:^ i

g ^^ i ^ erfl

grf^rrei

l i^rs^: srercist I

u ^f%cri spreh

i wfSriflr s?r^,

J I T ^r: r^nn I

-'IFIT

3^ I *rft$dRqtf*[ i ^tr^ i

, %f^ur aw i^ 3^ ^ s fNt^5. I

I iw Kl^ qr s^sr ,{f

1 5pnS?Tn: ^i 4^1 CM

I 'T ^ Ri>Tf

i ^r-^jc, ^J)^:.

iii -'i

.7 n '

^ gjar f i

srirac

\< 517,

- - BNS'T^IK I

T nwiin

mmm \\

i era*.

^n^rr ,

OT -?rr

*S SPB Strega I

3T sftoR ?TTT

: I : I

*TFTT-

ff^ir i

5f*Trrit

5*32W I

3inr<f^r H i

n. ^ IRF

,SOTRT^T

f^Rrs*

fl'l' ^T W-

ift w I

| ci^ f^rar

I f^^r^qwr TTHI^ ,

I r^rr: fsrs sr^r^ TF^ n

I TTTTTT ^T 7*nsrn

I ST ^TFr^T^T^f 1 smT* ^T^sTTfT^

^1: 'fhn STT^TTTT ^T fr?4 imnnr

3Twn U M sra

>*n|*TT

man ^5^ ^'THST^^TT sfri^m fr%

j i smwff^T^r 3

rrfh?rftoft 3 Tilr* i

T%T H^F I ffr 3

^ ^-^1 ^^JTI^S^'^'^^r?5-TK., H-

$51 ^TT HT^t

^rr ^rr,

ff^ i %,

TT3TR *H? I

i siftrftcrfi Tj r^a i

t I cTf ^TT 3* TT^fT

cf^r m^r^ft^ift \

i ^^TEPPF. m

fwnfrWir

-TJiir 'J w iiT nprrfri.**

^r ft *nftpr:

Sffl^ff UK U]

ift Aatontawl tWw ^

IT, nf

i, *[-

f . I 1

fi 'ft rr< 'ii i ii

rr J I

Ji n>i MN. K

'M n uf j'

i < iiMM ii f

i t,\u {. H, -ii 4'

T*M *i

i;f^ q^f 4 j rV

i r err

^rr>-rr,

?r^: I

^ ^* i

qfrftmftfi r

f3r>T rrc*rJRm i sr^nrt ft

firlt i fa^fi, itr s^ if^ en, 4^c^r

i gi^ I

f^fer T^

5 I %?4 f^n: I arftftrgpu I an-

TT: >nft

i flftf^r is

i ^^r I

i srrs^r i

wf^ ^f^

, fit* ft'wunV mw --

rarrofSira'p'STri

'A sn;

I g^N^ i

:qT Nil]

?T|T I

Nr ^J I 'RfT'JFTT ft

-5 I ?Tf<TT

I Nrac i

ftrwiTfirPr

I ^pnFST^^nlr i

m*\ <^ t

Q'-rowiiMtf

l ffir I

i Rcwrsra T. i

\ ftqft* 'T

TOT** ^T^TT

w?rprrrer

| Trfrqj ^JT^r^r^ i

3TT TTITT

[span.

. i sr5*n^?i% ^i

I srr, 3^r ^r,

<fanftraKr [mi

3 Iffa

I arar,

f%rir r, Bi^rr

rf^rw sr^ft

i qR^rr^ipT, flsr

*nrtcf i

ft T?F?T:

fief =3i5rra

Safari?

Sjft^T^^R^RJf: I ^cr^ l?

, 3?wEif

|75^T ^ I ^q^ii Mn

H ^q^i^r^n^T' <r

, WRIT-

<i?r 5^' i

<?*JTir

-IHf8l:lWl

l fart?

3m** fft i

I TT*?<? :, ft-

* I : I

WIT I I IT-

VS\9 SRK

firatf

err, *r5r 5JO

1 1 sT

i^rrer qrs

I ?rrt%

I ?fVEft

%f3iqr

i 3%srsinftnR5reftor,

rt'Tf^' fl% i tfar^fi Trf^ji ,

i ftftrr ?^-~ frftft^raftft i

3T, ^r^ i

*Txfi*Tfa*TT*T STT I %^r%4 ^r i

feiq?j i

i t^r1^ n

^rsflr

t^ ftg: I +

,i ^f fwrft I ^ ft?C5niaiftraRT.

ft:, ^anfiii ff^

^ wi&fot

i ^s^ \

W:A^ mj\

t i *Rrefapiror

i srtStawi 'tRTi I

i|TT Kfr^TrecfRr^ i

^ ^r^t ,

5% ?rr%,

I . ^. ....... 4-1Jhl

:sr*rii

fre?c5r

3ir^nr

SrsqfJrf?f,

r rewf

*rf*ftf I

?Sw. I

, ft ft,

Vft TO ^ n

*\ sre

I rnE^r I

I ^FRig^ift ^rr m^rr Tin^T ^rr

cfl^ ^9, I

ripp^ STT ^ ^n:^ I

^HWl^^T^cf^T^ I

I PrRw

: i ^TT f^q^ripiTftfir ^: ^TT^^^J I

wm: \ ^TT ^Tg^^T^^rrfeiTiif:l

qorsrg*frrraHhTs

*rrr <i 5 ]<c sru

3TT trf^^TT^r^'T I 3TT

J I ^TT

sir ^RU^ris^ ^^ ^rr

fif$ranf%, wr*rra, <jjf ^^tf% %fw, qvcnrarcft ^rn^r^^^^ i

^4 T^ f T^T%^ ^%^ %??r T^fc> %n^5nft5rffif%,

^T T^fr i srs^gri qrs. I

I ?ra: HT?^: I

fsttlt

~^^ 3-r%

, aft *A. 9 *r^3. n

WRI. 2|r I cf '

3T?*ff

J fiwrat

i 'wi^BT sr^rg^st

1TTIJT

pr?f fsrc i

. <: <:j

firfiPWn*1H

I wrow

Tr(H*j[

i ^r^^^qr^ <p?r

5-ogr i SJ^^^-R ^ \

nt f ^iwrt

wft TO n

fir^r 7s

trr. v-J <:<:. a*', tfirr^u^s: i

^rwsw^ 1 -an^w

r, ^ftprr

T\vnft^ i ir*^, ^

T-MT^TT

f?Tnrifl*f'K*J3r-ll*M -4 M^F^ ; '41

, ('J HWI '^^'i' ^ 4-4

: i 5^^qrf^^ i

W TOT *n

M -iffrgrrirrrn

i +{ MI TMI

T^T^If 4 i ?IR ^ 'I

I 3T5T

. \<\\- *

?T$*TT

^BMi-t ii j

rot -(i^j', ' I'JT 7^.j

HI '4 SI If i fJ

, frMi

qpmnir

r?T 1 ~M'rI

,r --IF,

t' ffir

aw, ^TW

I 95*11

'3r'Tl

I nvtrn ^T^TTSSW i

NH i 40*11*

i <icr

i rrr 3

Off;T5rTRT7 ^^TT^ I

3 ^r^^ fari t

ftn^ ,

*RT5fe*i* 5ft

c^r, ^

I TOTW

**&***

TW^^ 1

i *r ^rr

ffr I : I

Prfi^r?

f%f^r%, ^T^T^ fiw

i [ it

*T*IF|

l *ti I

l s Trsn r^Ti^i: ^TT^ I

I ^aW^Tf <a

^if^<'|n :rT^wrt 'T^sr I

i TO ftprg ^T f|it

f|: J<3TJlc*rf^m% %**J I ^

I ^RAwrr ftftrarr. ^^r^^i. j

i Piwg^' ftww^p. i G&fcstm ^^^g^rf%^ i

i sr^qi^^nft i 95131raraara gs[^

I CRT.,

I *w I

qtssfq

in<lr f

?r?r ^q qj^ i

r i ^r^f33^> 9 i^ntcr sprat I

Ttf t is

^r ft i

t ft g nrr: i

\ ?T?I-

s , i-r

^P*T^ ^?T 3

g^ T^. i%^?r

^i^r f^ I

i cf ^ ^r^rr

sftaf^rfa

j $?ftf%

I ^rr^n I

wi M si

TT'STT

TT5TT ^rr,

i grorA,

, 3TTf^?T

, cfRTT

, r*r^

?rrp3cf

i 'c^i^t ft

q:?rr:

, vr^flr n

%rrcrRt ^IPTR;i

I ^rf%

ftPiwr*n. im,

*i WTJ T

^i ffif

?*r, TIT f^ft:,

3jrr?rT

srf^ i

i qvrfci ^rr^r SJT% i

i 3T if q^c ctzrrf^ i ^5rc ^^ST^^ T ^Rf

; f^j TWPI ?i% sr? i

., f%-

^rr *rf?r

t h*I I

cnrri* l|lfr a-wrs

rft *rfNsfcn^ I fta*

q^ri% I ^rf

SIR*R. ir I

I ^r ^rt I

$'*rr i<>] sra

frit wnftf *ff

S[f<T<w

ITT II

cRff fjR f

JflT T

%qr>ri

J ^TTJJW: u

^cir I 3

T ^^cq^g^q-^f 3T%^ ^i^'Wr 5&S1FWTRRI9T

iftr^ir

fife; i 5^ . 11

, ft^ir

I f*r5T*rrf% ^^^^t^frTcri^ |'

T swift i *r

i Tflt

3? <n sn,

F3rt ft

s'raqt ft

-i rfr

\ 4t V iff, S

?Pr ft

japan H

|_.*r~nr ^

^^5^ rf%g[RT

i ffir

*raFTcf^Tffsfa I

I ^RT&sr T5T

, eftw ^-^hiq; ^q-* '

fflf ^K

5Tf, (I

Rft5T 3%

^r, ^r,

3T 'BT 3T

ftwra, ^w sww 11

, qomw,

tr*-rjq-?r i <=r?r

3-=^ I

I <ifa<nc*?R7?% ^r STT^^H ^r ^nftratar I

^r, -w ^rVa i

1 'T^ 1^ ?? *f

<CTFTC*FC i

fs sn^^ft^fI

fasrr it

ftim i mrowft faw

i iwTKw I

I ^T^Tr^ I

* a ftrt

mm o* w

raaM 11

^rt ^ ftr^ ^^TI^^ ^^RTT^S srcsf^r: I ^

fa*^ f^

^rrfti

???r=5Fqr

, , q<r

3T 3TF

I ?rar ci

flwftft 's^rt ft*

nfinr-

** ? *

~ , I* ; j

*? j -7

, ****

3l f 4

' ' ***** *

*r^rf%, wr

srr 'ff^,

^^ ^ ^g; f*T5f,

^ri%fr?r ^,

I cf^,

rf^HTC ^R'TT^^^^^Wf I

, ST.,

J I ^n=7^r ft

ffit I

5T^t rfT

i ^Tf^^n^ i^^tTW ^'^TT: sK*Rm I

f^N^^Tf ^ftr^^:^ i

f%qrfi?ri

i *i^rarc^j T> ^STWRC^^FPr +ir^r i ?-

, i^^rw ftfrrar-

ft g -rr^rr

I srp<N ETII^IT I% ^

cT,?: I

m M 111

^T?r %i% i ^C

ffct I

-f 'U 'mj <J> 'H

*r*rT<n?r

Hl-'f ,*w I ^^H ,

fl: ^ ,

?r: Kjr

Ffl fl

;an*nri

<* it 8

lifcT,

%*TTi: n

i <ET T?,

ft S I

>r^rfcr'

^JT ^^

r _ rx.

1 1 - M b rilJ

JhHI6r^' 1t I

~i >n J 51

UK^WMTO

wi3i fifoflg

+F-=(f?f ii^f,

<ju sra

i ^ f?T ^

-T i f

ft *%<* qfai

3TT .I

57ri%<r;ror

T3rf /w^ngwrsr

, ^^^5 rg^

f^RTf? I

1 ifttr

TO 5npra l

t ^r^r it

T%r^'a;

s^rtfs i 3

I R II

m i H^P * JTR I

?i ^r^rr

i aiiwRi Ji/ssrw s^f/fnf wr-rfi ^r r rr

wfir, TO

I TOF?T

'?n4l ?^r if^ra t^^r

, g-frr *fFr.

?<re:*tf?r

ffl^r ^,

, crgr f^f^r,

sr^sft<r i

, ci n

I [ gfe

5fRnr, ^s 3-35 ; t

TTIT: r^rf^^r: li

*jf*ij

Tf/ rnr

TPT ' '

: I TT^TT

srfN: I sTfg*gr: 3?fimft STT

i ?i?*

f^rrzr

:, f ^isr j

sw?ptf

irr swi

,'{ 'Jr-rM T rH

-f -i-iH--tHi

^ n- <ni i r f '-i- -<J J * '

, ^f TI'^1 f'rl>* . ' 'if .' i' J

i --Ti^'i^ M'f,'i*j i i

f^'if'r^ < J u+l-TU.

I T%fi<r:jpr;

I TT-Tf^sffqlf U^-nT'?R I ^

I w'Tl^P'liTT: SfS^^n^f^tTT^ I

^ rf i

P if IF *{ n'M i i 1. 1

,f-i^'iM --rn

'll?-* (M I i l;

?'Uii'i '

f- { H ^ 1 'l*+Jl'I M.'H i T,

qftq)%

ftralro i

i i M 1 n

rrni T hrs^c ir

,% Tf i

, T%*^ft -ri:Pffer i ^?r ^^ I

S <Tr r

j5r|^ 3rJj I

Z-lH. 51WI '^1%^ ftresnra 3

I ^r*rA, ft^r,

jw: ft fq

^rffl: ii

ftftrf^HW

^51*4:

*?trr*rr'f^F-ft <>f J^-^F. -K-.

:. i ft

ff% qre: :|

,iM m,

f4fw*frj

?ra: snrar ii

rfnrft

READY FOR SALE

Otnti) (^ H H fcnati SH Rama Aiiini

Mahai *rjah1 ') C

(Kwyi)iiapi;i1>d,n<liid by H H SA Hi ^n Rtnu

Maliu<1]ih \\ithtlie

ot It arAia \ irnn Koil

Tn^andrum Sanskrit Scries

No [ z&S*3i (N \SLuint) IA D^ \ \ \\jfliPuiu

^h k u i u( Kiislni'liIh--

kii-%hiui illsukaiijiiiii

(K< i\\i) ))\ \ lin mi Bl

B1ni (Second Edition)<

\ Nikikanthi Dik-

(Almk1i i)

b\ Mti.iiM Bxic uta

\vitli coinujcntar > 2 J2 u

f> g4if.^ (\r

}akaiana) ly S irana<le\a 2 C

7 5j^ld\=IM*l^f*l (\ulanta) >}S.uh-

i haiisvati 2 1 i

(Nataka) )>}Ra\i Vai ni i

Bhu|>a i 01u

n >\ith the coinniontai^ of

< hdki i\ <u tin ( ) S

Xo 10 rf?r3r^ften>

(Gajalaksli.iii i) by Nilakantha S u

X o 11 cT^Rf^raR^rac (Nfitak i

)b \ K , ilasekh,u a

Viima uith the commentary ot Sua-7&ma 2 40

No 1 2 J^wt^mtijC Or

edSuta) b\ Bhaga\ud Adi-

ebha AMtli the

commentaiyof

JJS,ghav-fiiian<la O

N*> 1 3 5*r?T9Rsr'snn (Xfitaka) )>>Kula-ekhai a

Vaima with the commentary >f Sivaulraa. 2 '

us AS r

y 14 sflfcmi (jM.ta.) lv\ Kamandaki, vuth the

comiiientai 3 oi Smkai<ti\a -^ *

Tsfo 15 ^rarar*iw^cm (JST*tiki) b BliS^a.L

(bccoiul Ectiti.11)

Kl ISO100

(fetuti)

witli tlu comment u \ of Dcsiru > .i tl

i 10019

Bhatta and NaiMaii t P mlita I i <'

No 20 **fc*mMi (Nat ika) bi Bljfi^i 1 <s

l>o DC 1

Nn 9 2

(NftUki) by Bba^i 1 s G

mu(Flit I JL t^ JlHlKcUXl s) 1 U C

dh t ' an 12

(Kat.il-i) bv Inn o 12

27 ^TRSF^rar (Iva^ % i> bj KdLJa^iv ith

tlxo t^o C(nmaeu *iiics, Piakd'-ikt oL

Aiuuaoiiinatlia mclN^ivai^na

oi N,ia-

3ana Paiwlita (Pail I l-t <L 2nd Nui*i^) 1 12 <J

(Bh.u _ '-. a)by\iUiara^ (J 8 C

29 <imwH4^^r ( Lv >-i)

b , >b u

(Pail II SulKftiwU) 240JNc. 30 ^il^t^tT (toil p*i)

51 mnfon*3ire (Kosa) by

4th, 5th & 6th|aiidab) 100

K 3 AS P

No 32 ^TR^F^T (Kavja) by K&hda^i \Mth the

two commeiitai ieh, PiaketaikS, oi Aiuna

giimsLthaand A

ri\aiana of

NfiASyanaPandita (Pait II, Sid, 4th & 5th Saigas) 280

No 33 <=m*r=<*^5 (Vyfikaiana) \\ith the coiii-

mentaiy Dipapiablid of Naiajana, 080No 34 nfiKflm (^r^qf^E^) (N>a>i) by RA]a 140No 35 fltern: (a^TTFna^) (N}d\a) by Gopt-

jiatha 180No 36 ^TF^rvRr (Ka\>a) l>y X&hd&ba with the

two couimeiitai ic'*,Piak&sikft ot Aiu-

iiagniucttha and \r

ivaiaiu of NaiayauaPandita (l\it III Gth, 7th iSL 8th Saiga^) 300

No 37 ^lu^i&frH; (Smiiti) by Vaiaiuclu with

commentaiy 040No 38 ^nwfesTgsaro^r^ (Kosa) by

Amarasnnha

with tl)e (ommciitaiy TikS,h u\ava oF

\ aiid)iighdti3a S*u\<1naiKla (Patt I ls<

KAnda). 200No SO^ii^t^i^ (Nataka) by Bhftha 12

No 40 Bi^ft^K^pl^ (Alank&ia) b> ItAjanaka {MI

Ivit^yaka \\uli tho \lankclia^cU\ah\\a of

McUikhuka iiud its commentary by2 <S

No 41 ^vrn^lSS^ (ivalj)a) hv Apastamlu \\ith

naiaiiaot hii hankaia I31ia<uat l>ttda 040

No iaR>^|4< tdcb^(NaUka) by Bhana 180No

\\itli the t\vo comment u ios,

dohatana of Iv^hn isnamm and TikA

sai \ ab\\ a oi: \T

an<lyagh<iti} a h u vAnanda

(Part II 2ud Kftiida 1 6 Vargas). 280

RS AS ff

No 41 vtfl^H^TciuticL) by BhattSiaka Sn Ve-

dottama 040No 45

Md4^^(P*

apanchahi idaya) 100No 46 qfi^TT?z*p% (Vjakarana) by Nilakaiitha

Dikshita 080No 47 &<Hafe<i5W3% (VecUnta) by Su

Knbhu&nanda Sara&^ati (Part I) 1 12

No 48 Do Do (Paitll) 200Isio 49 ^ftw^Tf^T (Jjoti&ha) by Paiame&waia 040NTo 50 *iu1**^wi ( ALtnk^ia ) bj Singa

Bhup^la 300No 51 twfWigvTKjmJdL, (Kosa) by Amaiasimha

vith the two comixientaiieb, Amarakosoc ^a&t>na of KshiiatoWamni and Tikcfc-

b-u \ a&w a ot \ and^ igliati>a Sai vananda

(Paitlll ^ndKanda7 10 Vargas) 200No 52 n?rteT^rrer'T^: (JIo,sa) bj Amaiasimha

\\ith the commentary TikSsar\ahwa of

Vandj nghaLi i Sai \finanda (Pait IV3id K^nda) 180

eciS,iita) by PiakSbfitmayatindia 12

5- ^rarf^yiiii^ti^< ^Nataka) by SuAtahenth aviki anirix aiuun

080No* 50*~~^d^'^ 4&*<ft (Silpa) 080No >7 - -<^cTR^dH (Kavya), 1 4

cddnla) by Sit

a ISai ih^ati (Pait 111) 2

No OU HflTi^T'PT^ (Nitika)\\ith the commentary-\jmaiMii 1 of SivaiUma 340

00 -^S^far* fStuti) by Sri Laghubhattaiaka

\vithtlie comiueiitaiy of Sri E

\ananda 080

RS. A3.

; 61 <%<inifa<ii3a^(Vedftnta) by Sri Krishna.

nanda Sarasvati CPai't IV ,) 1. S -0

No, 62 $*tdMS: (San-aiiiatastingrahu). 8

No. 63 f%*R?ri?ffcj*a; (Kayya) by Bharavi with the'

commentary Sabd&rthadlpika of Chitra-

bhanu (1, 2 ami 3 Sargns).2 S

'No. 64 ^w%r: (Kayya) by KaUdasa with ...die?.

commentary Piw.lipa of DakshinAvavta-

natha. 1

ISTo. 65 <wenj; (Silpa) by Mavainuni. . ,..

No. 66 ttftufamfl (Pai-sana)with tho com -

liieiitiiryParaimla o Mahcswarauanda 2 8

No. 67^^^lT: (Tautra) by NarAyana with

the commentary Vimarsini /o:Saukara.-

(Part I. 1-0 Fatalas) 3 4

: (Agama) by Sri Bhojadeva

with the cotamcntary. Tatparya-

dipikaot Sri Knninrtu '1

No. 69 t^RT%^?|%^r^: (Tantra) by IsAiiasiva-.

ffurudevamisra (Part I. Saroauyapada). 1 <S 15

o v- .__-.'

No. 70 nfcfs^*falJSW: (Part I)..-

No. 71 ?F5RTf^: (Tantra) by Narft^na^ith

arthashastra in sanskrit

Documents

rekhaganitam in sanskrit

indische tradition kautilyas arthashastra · 2018. 1....

arthashastra part 1

kautilya's arthashastra in contemporary management

thirukkural in sanskrit

brief on arthashastra

management values in kautilya's arthashastra

arthashastra & corporate governance ppt

m.a. in sanskrit

arthashastra of chanakya & other books - internet archive

sanskrit in asia

management practices from ‘kautilya’s arthashastra’...

sthotras in sanskrit

kautilyas arthashastra in contemporary management

rudram in sanskrit

arthashastra statecraft.pdf

16th world sanskrit conference - sanskrit … · world...

20882390 kautilya arthashastra marathi part 3 3

kautilya’s arthashastra: a timeless grand strategy

arthashastra of chanakya_-_english