accelerated learning options: an underutilized …...accelerated learning options: an underutilized...
Post on 06-Jun-2020
6 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Dr. Stephen Pruitt, SREB – Moderator
Dr. David Gardner, Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board
Dr. Debbie Blanke, Oklahoma State Regents for HigherEducation
Dr. Ken Sauer, Indiana Commission for Higher Education
Accelerated Learning Options: An Underutilized Approach to Increase Success for All Students
• Dual (concurrent) enrollment in general continues to increase
• Accelerated options have shown a positive impact on student readiness to do college-level work, persistence, affordability, and completion
• Dual Enrollment has also been embraced by many policymakers
Dual Enrollment Context
2Stephen Pruitt | August 7, 2019
• Dual Enrollment has not met its potential in terms of establishing equitable access for all students– Lower percentage of Hispanic students (30%) and Black
student s (27%) took courses for postsecondary credit in high school than did White or Asian students (both 38%)
– Students in city schools more commonly took these courses on a college campus (26%) than did students in rural high schools (11%)
– Students in rural schools more commonly took these courses online (12%) than did suburban students (5%)
But…
3Stephen Pruitt | August 7, 2019
Dual Credit and 60x30TX
David W. Gardner, Ph.D.Deputy Commissioner for Academic Planning and
Policy/Chief Academic Officer
4
5
5
60x30TXOne of the goals of 60xTX is to increase college completions
6
66
60x30TXDual credit participation has become more diverse by race/ethnicity
2000 2018
71.0%
3.1%
22.3%
2.7%0.8%
33.8%
8.2%47.2%
4.5%6.4%
7
77
Note
60x30TXNearly 30 percent of graduates from public colleges and universities in 2018 took dual credit courses
LevelTotal Grads 2018
Graduates with Dual Credit
Percent with Dual Credit
Bachelor’s 105,631 33,871 32.1
Associate 75,113 18,125 24.1
Certificate 24,486 4,643 19.0
Total 205,230 56,639 27.6
8
88
Note
8
AIR findingshttp:/ / www.thecb.state.tx.us/ reports/ PDF/ 11641.PDF?CFID=87411184&CFTOKEN=36079171• Dual‐credit education boosts college enrollment and completion mostly through
two‐year institutions
• The benefits generated by dual credit education greatly exceed (by 5x) the cost of delivery.
• For the courses examined, dual credit courses were as rigorous as college credit‐only courses
• Constraints faced by high school counselors and college advisors can challenge the advising that dual credit students receive
• Student-borne costs, extracurricular activities, and scheduling challenges reported to be most common barriers to dual credit participation
• State and district policies and school philosophies determine the extent that high school counselors and college advisors actively targeted certain student groups
OklahomaConcurrent Enrollment
• History• Data• Benefits• Challenges
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
19992000 20042005 20092010 20172018
Stud
ent C
ount
Academic Years
Concurrent High School Students in Oklahoma Higher Education
InstitutionsYears: 2000, 2005, 2010, 2018
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
Stud
ent C
ount
Academic Years
Oklahoma Concurrent High School Students By Gender2000 through 2018
FEMALE
MALE
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
1999
2000
2000
2001
2001
2002
2002
2003
2003
2004
2004
2005
2005
2006
2006
2007
2007
2008
2008
2009
2009
2010
2010
2011
2011
2012
2012
2013
2013
2014
2014
2015
2015
2016
2016
2017
2017
2018
Stud
ent C
ount
Academic Years
Oklahoma Concurrent High School Studentsby Race/Ethnicity
2000 through 2018
AMERICAN INDIAN ORALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICANAMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
MULTIPLE
Benefits• Higher academic
achievements;• Higher college going rates,
retention rates, and completion rates;
• Reduced costs to families;• Shortens time to degree.
Challenges/Barriers• Waiver for tuition only;• Unfunded mandate for
juniors;• Adequate faculty capacity at
the colleges;• No cost share with K-12;• Primary delivery by
community college but completions at universities;
• Demand for early college growing.
Accelerated Learning Options:Dual Credit and Early College in Indiana
SHEEO Policy Conference, BostonAugust 7, 2019
Ken Sauer, Ph.D.Senior Associate Commissioner and Chief Academic Officer
Indiana Commission for Higher EducationOffice: (317) 232-1090
Cell: (317) 908-0536Email: ksauer@che.in.gov
Dual Credit/Early College:Statewide Ingredients for Success
1. Legislation (2 Dual Credit and 2 AP Classes)2. Transfer and Applicability3. Funding (Recurring Line Item; STEM Teacher
Recruitment)4. Policy5. Practice (Infrastructure of Schools, Colleges
and Universities, IDOE)6. Data (To Track Student Outcomes)
Focus on Dual Credit
• Liberal Arts Courses– Priority Courses for Funding Purposes (42 Courses)– Courses Drawn from the Core Transfer Library (88
CTL Courses)– Statewide Transfer Gen Ed Core (STGEC)
• CTE Courses– Current Crosswalk to Certificates, Degrees– CTE Concentrator Initiative
Focus on Early College
• Partnership with the University of Indianapolis (CELL – Center of Excellence in Leadership of Learning) since Jan. 2013
• Endorsement Process (3 steps):– Emerging (39 high schools)– Pursuing (15 high schools)– Endorsed (30 high schools)
• Postsecondary Partner (NACEP/State NACEP)
Focus on Results and Equity(Jan. 2019 Analysis of 2016 Cohort of HS Grads)
Increase in Percent of HS Grads Earning Dual Credit (2012 and 2016 Cohorts):• Black: 22% to 35% (+13%)• Hispanic: 31% to 49% (+18%)• Asian: 33% to 60% (+27%)• White: 42% to 63% (+21%)• Free/Reduced Lunch: 31% to 48% (+17%)• No Free/Reduced Lunch: 43% to 63% (+20%)
gap up 8%gap up 3%gap down 6%
top related