a true-zero load stable capacitor-free cmos low drop-out regulator with excessive gain reduction a...

A True-Zero Load Stable Capacitor-Free A True-Zero Load Stable Capacitor-Free CMOS Low Drop-out Regulator with CMOS Low Drop-out Regulator with

Excessive Gain ReductionExcessive Gain Reduction

1

John Hu and Mohammed IsmailJohn Hu and Mohammed IsmailThe Analog VLSI LaboratoryThe Analog VLSI LaboratoryThe Ohio State UniversityThe Ohio State University

Presented at ICECS 2010Presented at ICECS 2010December 15, 2010December 15, 2010

Outline Outline

Introduction Issue: Capacitor-Free Low Drop-Out (LDO) Problem: True-Zero Load Stability

Approach Method: Excessive Gain Reduction Schematic Design

Results Simulations Measurements

Conclusion

2

Capacitor-Free LDO RegulatorCapacitor-Free LDO Regulator

External capacitor-free low drop-out (LDO) regulators are popular because of the benefit in space and cost

3

iPhone 3G, 2009. iPhone 4, 2010.

True Zero-Load StabilityTrue Zero-Load Stability

Conventional Miller-based pole splitting topologies suffer from zero-load oscillation

There is a short-cut solution:requiring a minimum Iout

Drawbacks Standby efficiency degradation

4

Proposed MethodProposed Method

Observation: not all DC gain contributes to Miller Effect

Excessive Gain (G1)Reduction

Given the same totalDC gain, morecan be distributedto G2 and G3 toenhance the Miller effect

5

Schematic DesignSchematic Design

Conventional: G1: opamp G2: positive

gain stage G3: MPT

Proposed: G1’ G2’: positive

gain stage G3’: MPT

6

Simulations: Bode PlotSimulations: Bode Plot

7

Simulations: Load TransientSimulations: Load Transient

Load Regulation: (conventional vs. proposed) Both are stable when power is unlimited Only the proposed is stable during true zero-load (sleep mode)

8

Conclusion from SimulationsConclusion from Simulations

Power Efficiency Improvement When true zero-load stability (TZLS) is required (sleep mode),

the proposed method reduces the battery current by 67.5% [2]

Area efficiency Conventional: 23 pF to achieve true zero-load stability [3] Proposed: 4.5 pF [4]

9

Chip FabricationChip Fabrication

A dual-core LDO was fabricated in MOSIS 0.5 um CMOS under the same specs

One conventional, one proposed.

10

Test BoardTest Board

PCB with off-chip load test solutions High power rating resistors, NMOS, “stay alive” Ioutmin options:

11

Test SetupTest Setup

Test Equipment and Connections

12

Measurement ResultsMeasurement Results

Transient load regulation (conventional): Vin=3.7 V, Vout=3.5 V. Stability with “stay alive” current.

13

Measurement ResultsMeasurement Results

Transient load regulation: 50% chance of over current (Iout > 1 A, chip heats up.)

Reason: gate of the PMOS pass element floating: top level layout error

Correlation with simulation

14

ConclusionConclusion

Conclusions A true zero-load stable CMOS capacitor-free low drop-

out regulator is presented It reduces the excessive gain (G1) and re-distributes

the gain to Miller-enhancing stages (G2, G3) As a result, system power efficiency during standby

can be improved by 67.5%

Future Work Further analysis of the excessive gain reduction technique

and battery life extending IC design methods Lessons learned for future first-time-right silicon

15

Selected ReferencesSelected References

1. K. N. Leung and P. Mok, “A capacitor-free CMOS low-dropout regulator with damping-factor-control frequency compensation”, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 1691-1702, Oct. 2003

2. S. K. Lau, P. K. T. Mok, and K. N. Leung, “A low-dropout regulator for SoC with Q-reduction”, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 658-664, Mar. 2007

3. R. Milliken, J. Silva-Martinez, and E. Sanchez-Sincencio, “Full on-chip CMOS low-dropout voltage regulator”, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Reg. Papers, vol. 54, no.9, pp. 1879-1890, Sep. 2007

4. J. Hu, W. Liu, and M. Ismail, “Sleep-mode ready, area-efficient capacitor-free low-dropout regulator with input current-differencing”, Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, vol. 63, no.1, pp.107-112, Apr. 2010

16

Thank you!Thank you!