a conceptual approach to common core state standards
Post on 23-Feb-2016
32 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
A CONCEPTUAL APPROACH TO COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS
Michael L. KamilStanford University
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
THE PRESENTATION
What Common Core is and is not Why we need Common Core Requirements for College and Work ELA and disciplinary standards Disciplinary standards Text variables and complexity Implications for Special Education
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
COMMON CORE CRITERIA Aligned with college and work
Rigorous content and high-order skills
Use strengths of current standards
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
COMMON CORE CRITERIA
Informed by international data
Evidence and/or research-based
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
COMMON CORE DETAILS Grade levels for K–8;
Grade bands for 9–10 and 11–12
Integrated model of literacy
Includes research & media skills
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
WHAT COMMON CORE IS NOT HOW to teach
ALL that can or should be taught
Definition of ADVANCED work
INTERVENTIONS for advanced or struggling students
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
WHAT COMMON CORE IS NOT Support for ELL or SPECIAL NEEDS
WHOLE of college/work readiness
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
WHY COMMON CORE IS IMPORTANT"By 2018, we will need 22 million
new workers with college degrees“
“63% of all jobs will require college by 2018”
Help Wanted
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
MORE INFORMATION
Help Wantedhttp://cew.georgetown.edu/jobs2018
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
PREPARATION FOR COLLEGE OR WORK
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
DEMONSTRATE INDEPENDENCE
Comprehend and evaluate complex text across disciplines.
Construct effective arguments and convey multifaceted information.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
BUILD STRONG CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
Build knowledge in different subjects.
Become proficient in new areas.
Read purposefully.
Refine knowledge and share it.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
RESPOND TO DEMANDS OF AUDIENCE, TASK, AND DISCIPLINE
Consider context in reading.
Appreciate nuances.
Know that different disciplines use different evidence.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
COMPREHEND AND CRITIQUE
Open-minded, skeptical, readers.
Understand what authors are saying.
Question an author’s assumptions.
Assess the veracity of claims.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
PRIVILEGE EVIDENCE
Cite text evidence for interpretations.
Make reasoning clear.
Evaluate others’ use of evidence.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
CARE ABOUT PRECISION
Mindful of impact of vocabulary.
Compare meanings of different choices.
Attend to when precision matters.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
LOOK FOR AND CRAFT STRUCTURE
Attend to structure when reading.
Understand presenting information in different disciplines.
Understand how author’s craft relates to setting and plot.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
USE TECHNOLOGY STRATEGICALLY AND CAPABLY
Employ technology thoughtfully.
Efficiently search online for information.
Integrate online and offline information.
Select best suited media for goals.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
UNDERSTAND OTHER CULTURES AND PERSPECTIVESStudents actively seek to understand other perspectives and cultures through reading and listening. They can communicate effectively with people of varied backgrounds. They evaluate other points of view critically and constructively.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
ANCHOR STANDARDS
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
KEY IDEAS AND DETAILS1. Read closely to determine what
the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it.
2. Determine central ideas or themes and analyze their development; summarize the key supporting details and ideas.
3. Analyze how and why individuals, events, and ideas develop in a text.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
CRAFT AND STRUCTURE4. Interpret words and phrases as
they are used in a text and analyze how specific word choices shape meaning.
5. Analyze the structure of texts, including how specific sentences, paragraphs, and larger portions relate to each other and the whole.
6. Assess how point of view or purpose shapes the content and style of a text. June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
INTEGRATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND IDEAS
7. Integrate and evaluate content presented in words and diverse media.
8. Delineate and evaluate the argument in a text, as well as the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence.
9. Analyze how two or more texts address similar themes or topics.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
RANGE OF READING AND TEXT COMPLEXITY
10. Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
HISTORY/SOCIAL STUDIES 6-8
Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.
9-10
. . . attending to such features as the date and origin of the information.
11-12
. . . connecting insights gained from specific details to an understanding of the text as a whole.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
SCIENCE/TECHNICAL 6-8
Determine the central ideas or conclusions of a text; provide an accurate summary of the text distinct from prior knowledge or opinions.
9-10
. . . trace the text’s explanation or depiction of a complex process, phenomenon, or concept; provide an accurate summary of the text.
11-12
. . . summarize complex concepts, processes, or information presented in a text by paraphrasing them in simpler but still accurate terms.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
TEXT TYPES
Literature:
By immersing themselves in literature, students enlarge their experiences and deepen their understanding of their own and other cultures.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
Information Text:
Because most college and workplace reading is nonfiction, students need to hone their ability to acquire knowledge from informational texts.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
Multimedia Documents:
Students must be able to integrate what they learn from reading text with what they learn from audio, video, and other digital media.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
Procedural Text:
Procedural texts convey information in the form of directions for accomplishing a task.
Such text is composed of discrete steps in a strict sequence, with an implicit end product or goal.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
Documents:
Documents require readers to draw on information presented as short continuous prose and also as columns, matrices, or other formats. Document structures can be simple or complex, embeded or “nested” information within the document structure.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
QUANTITY
Students must have the capacity to handle independently the quantity of reading material, in print and online, required in college and workforce training.
The amount of reading in high school is often far lower than that required for typical first-year college courses.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
NAEP TEXT TAXONOMY Differentiated texts
Literary text
Story
Literary nonfiction essay, speech, biography
Poetry
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
TAXONMY (CONT’D) Information text
Exposition
Argumentation and persuasion
Document and procedural
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
PISA ADDS
Electronic text or Hypertext:
A text with navigation tools that requires nonsequential reading.
Readers construct “customised” texts from portions of text.
Not all text is present.
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
GRADE LITERARY INFORMATION
4 50% 50%
8 45% 55%
12 NAEP = 30%CC = 25%
NAEP = 70%CC = 75%
DISTRIBUTION OF TEXT TYPES (NAEP)
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
TEXT COMPLEXITY
Structure
Purpose
Style and Language
Richness
Relationships
Knowledge Demands
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
A TALL ORDER Special Education and Common
Core
A difficult taskPrepare ALL students for College or
Work
Some advantages of Special Education
RtI is a natural for Common CoreTechnology and Special EducationJune 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
THE PRESENTATION What Common Core is and is not Why we need Common Core Requirements for College and Work ELA and disciplinary standards Disciplinary standards Text variables and complexity Implications for Special Education
June 12, 2012
CASE Sanibel Island mkamil@stanford.edu
THE END
June 12, 2012
top related