22 kim acute interstitial nephritis
Post on 11-Jul-2015
1.181 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Tuesday Clinical Case conference
10/ 2007 , Zae Kim MD
Acute Interstitia l nephritis
• Term first used by Councilman in 1898– Noted the histopathologic changes in autopsy
specimens of patients with diptheria and scarlet fever
• Immune-mediated cause of acute renal failure– Characterized by presence of an inflammatory cell
infiltrate in the renal interstitium and tubules
• there is a paucity of data in the literature
regarding optimal management of the condition
Incidence
• Significant cause of acute renal failure– series of 109 patients from a large center– biopsied for unexplained renal impairment with
normal sized kidneys– AIN accounted for 29 of 109 (27%) cases
– Farrington K, Levison DA, Greenwood RN, Cattell WR, Baker LR. Renal biopsy in patients with unexplained renal impairment and normal kidney size. Q J Med 1989; 70: 221–233
Causes
The changing profile of acute tubulointerstitial nephritis
; , 2004 ;19(1):8-11Backer RJ Pusey CD Nephrol Dial Transplant Jan
• A review of three series that totaled 128 pts – (71%) Drugs, with antibiotics responsible for 1/3– (15%) Infection-related– (8%) Idiopathic– (5%) Tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis (TINU)
syndrome– (1%) Sarcoidosis
Approxim a te d fre que ncy with which clinica l ma nife s ta tions …occur during
(A) methicillin-induced AIN(B) AIN induced by drugs other than methicillin(C) AIN induced by NSAIDs and associated with a nephrotic syndrome
http://www.nature.com/ki/journal/v60/n2/full/4492487a.html#fig2
Epidemiology
• The overall picture that emerges is of a syndrome that is becoming both – increasingly non-specific in clinical features – diverse in etiology
:Noninvasive diagnostic procedureeosinophiluria
Number of patients 65 92 183 199 539
Patients with AIN
Eosinophiluria 8 10 5 629 (63%)
No eosinophiluria 1 1 3 9 14
Patients without AIN
Eosinophiluria 27 12 15 10 64
No eosinophiluria 29 69 160 174432 (87%)
• Corwin, HL, Korbet, SM, Schwartz, MM: Clinical correlates of eosinophiluria. Arch Intern Med 1985 145:1097–1099• Nolan, CR, Anger, MS, Kelleher, SP: Eosinophiluria: A new detection and definition of the clinical spectrum. N Engl J Med 1986 315:1516–1519• Corwin, HL, Bray, RA, Haber, MH: The detection and interpretation of urinary eosinophils. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1989 113:1256–1258• Ruffing, KA, Hoppes, P, Blend, D, et al: Eosinophils in urine revisited. Clin Nephrol 1994 41:163–166
http://www.nature.com/ki/journal/v60/n2/fig_tab/4492487t2.html#figure-title
: Noninvasive diagnostic procedure – ?Gallium scan highly sensitive
• Gallium67 scintigraphy in the diagnosis of acute renal disease. Linton et al, Clin Nephrol.
1985 Aug;24(2):84-7.– N = 44 patients with various biopsy proven renal
disease• AIN = 11 patients• Two blinded observers
– Result• All 11 AIN (100%)• 5/33 (15%) of other renal disease had (+) uptake
– Glomerulonephritis, pyelonephritis
: Noninvasive diagnostic procedure – ?Gallium scan not highly sensitive
• N = 16 with AIN– (+) gallium scan in 11/16 (68%)– Koselj, M, Kveder, R, Bren, AF, Rott, T: Acute renal failure in patients
with drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis. Ren Fail 1993 15:69–72
• N = 12 with AIN– (+) gallium scan in 7/12 (58%)– Graham, GD, Lundy, MM, Moreno, JJ: Failure of 67gallium scintigraphy
to identify reliably non-infectious interstitial nephritis. J Nucl Med 1983 24:568–570
: Lab biopsy
• Inflammation of renal interstitium– Microscopically
• Multifocal cellular infiltration and edema• Mononulcear cells (lymphocytes and macrophages) usually
are the predominant types• Drug reaction
– Mononuclear cells, typically T cells (CD4>CD8)
• Glomerular and vascular sparing
Course
• Based on the course of methicillin-induced AIN– drug-induced AIN has long been considered a
relatively benign nephropathy– complete recovery of renal function was supposed to
be the rule if the inciting agent was removed
Analysis of published cases of AIN by drugs other than methicillin
course of renal function recovery
• At the end of follow up– Only 68% had
sCr <1.7– Only 40% had
sCr <1.2
68% w crt < 1.7
49% w crt < 1.2
Rossert, KI, 2001
?Prognostic factor
• could we identify patients with drug-induced AIN who are at high risk of incomplete recovery?– Severity of renal failure?– Histology
• Diffuse vs patchy infiltrate• Degree of fibrosis
– Duration of renal failure
Severity of renal function as prognostic? marker
• Patients were arbitrarily divided into three groups depending on serum creatinine levels at the end of follow-up
• Maximum serum creatinine levels did not differ among these three groups
Crt <1.2 Crt 1.2 – 2.2 Crt > 2.2
Rossert, KI, 2001
– ?Prognostic factor histology
• Diffuse vs patch interstitial infiltrates– n = 30, less favorable renal prognosis with diffuse vs
patch• sCr ~2 in 10/18 with diffuse (55%)• sCr ~1.1 in 9/12 w patch (75%)
» Laberke, HG & Bohle, A: Acute interstitial nephritis: Correlation between clinical and morphological findings. Clin Nephrol 1980 14:263–273
– Two other studies (n = 27 and 14) no correlation» Kida, H, Abe, T, Tomosugi, N, et al: Prediction of the long-term outcome in
acute interstitial nephritis. Clin Nephrol 1984 22:55–60» Buysen, JGM, Houtlhoff, HJ, Krediet, RT, Arisz, L: Acute interstitial
nephritis: A clinical and morphological study in 27 patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1990 5:94–99
– Conflicting result
Prognostic factor
• Duration of acute renal failure– N = 30
• Mean sCr ~1.4 with ARF < 2 wks• Mean sCr ~3.4 with ARF > 3 wks
» Laberke, Acute interstitial nephritis, Clin Nephrol 14:263, 1980
Pathophysiology
– Pathophysiology drug induced AIN
• Drug-induced AIN is secondary to immune reaction– AIN occurs only in a small percentage of individuals taking the
drug– AIN is not dose-dependent– Association with extrarenal manifestations of hypersensitivity– Recurrencence after re-exposure to the drug
• Experimental models– Suggest that drugs responsible for AIN induce an immune
reaction directed against endogenous renal antigens
Based on Experimental AIN
http://www.nature.com/ki/journal/v60/n2/fig_tab/4492487f1.html#figure-title
- Involvement of Drug Specific Tcells in Acute- Drug Induced Interstitial Nephritis
, , 17: 2919, 2006Spanou et al JASN
• Role of drug-specific responses in patients with a histologic diagnosis of DIN (Drug-Induced Nephritis)
• Identified drug-specific T cells• Characterized them phenotypically in vitro
Involvement of Drug-Specific T cells in Acute Drug-Induced Interstitial Nephritis Spanou et al, JASN, 17: 2919, 2006
Pt 1.Tx’d w abx for endocarditis, developed ARF 3 weeks after starting abx
Pt 2Tx for endocarditis, arf after 8 days
Pt 3ARF after 3 weeks
• Lymphocyte Transformation Test (LTT) used to analyze drug-specific proliferation of patients PBMC– Relies on observation that T cells divide and expand
after encountering the antigen– Measures H-thymidine uptake of dividing cells
Involvement of Drug-Specific T cells in Acute Drug-Induced Interstitial Nephritis Spanou et al, JASN, 17: 2919, 2006
… Lymphocyte Transformation Test- Drug specific proliferation of patients PBMC
Pt 1.
Positive proliferative response of PBMC to flucloxacillin
Pt 2
PBMC proliferative response to penicillin G
Pt 3
PBMC proliferative response to disulfiram
Involvement of Drug-Specific T cells in Acute Drug-Induced Interstitial Nephritis Spanou et al, JASN, 17: 2919, 2006
#Even though there were multi drug exposure, each patient elicited proliferative response to only one drug
- Tcell receptor Vb expression in a drug specific Tcell line by flowcytometry
• PBMC of pt 1 was incubated with flucloxacillin and IL-2
• CD3+ T cells bearing Vb9 and Vb21.3 were enriched
• Suggesting an oligoclonal T cell expansion
- TCR Vb staining in kidney biopsy specimens- - to determine whether the drug specific T cells from PBMC might be present in the kidney
• Total CD4 317/mmsq• TCR-Vb* 27 mm/sw
• Both show extensive T cell infiltrate• Both stained for TCR-Vb* specific to flucloxacillin (normally found on 4-7% of circulating T cell only)
• Total CD4 272/mmsq• TCR-Vb* 120/mmsq
- Involvement of Drug Specific Tcells in Acute- Drug Induced Interstitial Nephritis
, , 17: 2919, 2006Spanou et al JASN
• Implications…– In vitro proliferation assays might be helpful to
identify the drug that is responsible for the hypersensitivity reaction
• Particularly in patients with more than one medication exposure
– It’s likley that the T cell infiltration into the kidney is due to drug-specific T cells, which then might coordinate the local inflammatory reaction
Treatment
• Therapy aimed at modulating the immune response has been the main treatment for AIN
• Several small retrospective studies have suggested that corticosteroid therapy improves clinical outcome; however, no prospective studies exist
• Pusey CD, Saltissi D, Bloodworth L, Rainford DJ, Christie JL. Drug associated acute interstitial nephritis: clinical and pathological features and the response to high dose steroid therapy. Q J Med 1983; 52: 194–211
• Buysen JG, Houthoff HJ, Krediet RT, Arisz L. Acute interstitial nephritis: a clinical and morphological study in 27 patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1990; 5: 94–99
• Enriquez R, Gonzalez C, Cabezuelo JB et al. Relapsing steroid-responsive idiopathic acute interstitial nephritis. Nephron 1993; 63: 462–465
Retrospective study
Drug associated acute interstitial nephritis: clinical and pathological features and the response to high dose steroid therapy.Pusey et al, Q J Med 1983
: Acute inte rs titia l ne phritis a c linica l and 2 7 morphologica l s tudy in patie nts
, Buys e n e t a l . 1990;5(2):94-9Nephrol Dial Transplant
• N = 27 biopsy-proven AIN– 17 patients
• renal function improved after withdrawal of the drug
– 10 patients• Further decline in renal function in the two weeks
fol lowing admission• prednisone therapy was instituted • All with improvement of renal function
– with six returning to normal
: Acute inte rs titia l ne phritis c linica l fe a ture s and re s pons e to corticos te roid
the rapy , Clarks on e t a l 2004 19(11):2778-2783Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
• a retrospective study of all cases (n=60) of AIN found by reviewing 2598 native renal biopsies
over a 12 year period– Of those patients in whom complete follow-up data
were available (n = 42)• 60% received corticosteroid therapy while the remainder
received supportive care only
Effect of corticosteroid therapy in AIN compared with . conservative management
Values for serum creatinine (µmol/l) are given as median±interquartile range.
?Why no benefit
• Patients treated with steroids had more severe disease
• Significant proportion of the patients had NSAID-associated AIN, which is less likely to respond to steroid tx
The end
top related