1 quality education investment act of 2006 (qeia) 1 quality education investment act (qeia) of 2006...

1 Quality Education Investment Act of 2006 (QEIA)1

Quality Education Investment Act (QEIA) of 2006

County Superintendents’ Monitoring Responsibilities and Tools for School Use

October 28, 2008

County Superintendents’ Oversight

Timeline: Monitor implementation annually:

• Beginning in 2008-09 Conduct pre-monitoring visit:

• January – April 2009 Request documentation:

• June – August 2009

Timeline (cont’d):

Review documentation: • July – September 2009

Report findings to district: • September – October 2009 Report to SPI schools not meeting

implementation targets: • November 2009

4Quality Education Investment Act of 2006 (QEIA)4

Areas for review Williams v. State of California

Settlement Highly Qualified Teachers Average Teacher Experience Professional Development Class Size Reduction

Areas for review (cont’d) API Growth (beginning in 2011) Pupil to Counselor Ratio (High Schools

Only) Alternative Application Requirements

Class Size Reduction Monitoring

QEIA and Class Size Reduction: Requirements Planning 2007-08 Pre-Monitoring 2008-09 Calculating Average Daily Enrollment Monitoring End of School Year 2008-09

Class Size Reduction Requirements

QEIA Class Size Reduction Requirements: Requires funded schools by the end of

2010-11 school year and each year after, to meet all of the class size requirements in statute

QEIA Class Size Reduction Requirements (cont’d):

Schools must show incremental Schools must show incremental progress towards meeting interim progress towards meeting interim benchmarks of benchmarks of 1/31/3 in 2008-09, in 2008-09, 2/32/3 in in 2009-10, and 2009-10, and final goals final goals by 2010-11by 2010-11

Quality Education Investment Act of 2006 (QEIA)8

QEIA Class Size Reduction Requirements (cont’d): Not exceed 20 pupils per class in K-3

• Fully implement K-3 CSR Reduce class sizes at each grade level

in grades 4-12 by an average of 5 students per class, or to an average of 25, whichever is lower

QEIA Class Size Reduction Requirements (cont’d): Departmentalized Settings

Core Subject: CBEDS Assignment Codes

• 2100s English, including ELD, intervention

• 2400s Math, including CAHSEE

• 2600s Science

• 2700s History/Social Studies

QEIA Class Size Reduction Requirements (cont’d): Beginning in 2010-2011, full

implementation of CSR targets at all grade levels:• At no time may a QEIA CSR class enroll

more than 27 students• Ensure other non-core classes are not ther non-core classes are not

increased above the school-wide average increased above the school-wide average size from the baseline year of 2005-06size from the baseline year of 2005-06

Class Size Reduction Planning

Planning Year 2007-08: CDE posted class size guidance and

instructions for calculating targets:

www.cde.ca.gov/ta/lp/qe/qeia07csr.asp

www.QEIA.org

Planning Year 2007-08 (cont’d): Technical Centers worked with School

Services of California and CTA to provide training, tools, and assistance to county offices, districts, and schools

Planning Year 2007-08 (cont’d): Class Size Reduction Worksheets

• Self-Contained

• Departmentalized

• Combination of above

Planning Year 2007-08 (cont’d):

“Flexible” 1/3, 2/3 CSR implementation • Reducing all classes by one-third of the

required reduction each year

Class Size Class Size ReductionReduction

Base Class Size

2010-11Target Class

2008-09Target Class

2009-10Target Class

6th Grade 31.0 25.0 29.0 27.0

Grade 28.0 23.0 26.3 24.7

8th Grade 35 25.0 31.7 28.3

The school reduces all grade levels in the core subjects by 1/3 each year

⅓ ⅔

“Flexible” 1/3, 2/3 CSR implementation • Reducing classes in one-third of the

school’s grade levels

Grade Level

Base Class Size

2010-11Target

Class Size# of

Students

Grade 31.0 25.0 6

7th Grade 28.0 23.0 5

8th Grade 35 25.0 10

2008-09

8th grade is reduced

2009-10

2010-11

2008 - 09

2009 - 10

2010 - 11

“Flexible” 1/3, 2/3 CSR implementation • Reducing classes for one-third of the

school’s enrollment

Grade Enrollment

2010-11Target

Class Size Year

6th Grade 300 25.0

7th Grade 400 23.0

8th Grade 200 25.0

The school reduces classes for one-third of the school’s enrollment

10 - 11

09 - 10

08 - 09

“Flexible” 1/3, 2/3 CSR implementation • Reducing the class size of one-third of

their classes to the target class size each year

2008-09

English/Intervention/ELD

2009-10

Math/Intervention

2010-11

Science/History

Planning Year (cont’d):

“Flexibility” in how the school implements the interim benchmarks of 1/3 and 2/3• Method must clearly demonstrate that

the reduction in each of the interim years constitutes one-third of the progress needed to meet the CSR target required by the end of the 2010-11 school year

Due to flexibility in meeting interim CSR targets, county offices will need to verify the methodology that the school used to define their 1/3 and 2/3 CSR implementation plan

Full Implementation of CSR by 2010-11• Staffing projections for recruitment/

hiring

• Six-year budget planning

• Facilities

Class Size Reduction Pre-Monitoring

Pre-Monitoring 2008 – 09:Marlene Wilson

Deputy Superintendent

Susan AcevesDirector

Lennox School DistrictFelton ES

Jefferson ES

Lennox MS

Moffett ES

Pre-Monitoring 2008-09: Provide assistance and support to

ensure successful implementation of QEIA CSR requirements

Establish CSR target agreements

Pre-Monitoring (cont’d):

Discuss and document 1/3, 2/3, and full implementation plan for each school

Assist district in staffing projections and six-year budget planning

Pre-Monitoring (cont’d):

Document and sign • District CSR Target Summary

Archive at each county office Send a copy to the QEIA TA Center

Intermission #1

10 minute break

E-mail questions to:

QEIATA@lacoe.edu

Monitoring of class size reduction is based on Average Daily Enrollment

Similar to reporting done for• K-3 CSR• Morgan-Hart CSR

Class Size Reduction Reporting

Number of Days in the Reporting Period

Cumulative Number of Students Enrolled

=Average

Daily Enrollment

But there are some unique attributes to QEIA Applies to core subjects at middle and high

school Targets vary by grade level

Cumulative Number of Days Enrolled Grades K-8: Beginning of the school year

through April 15 Grade 9-12: Entire school year as put into

units of “months of instruction”• First month of the school year or from the

first month that a new class was created to the last month ending on or before June 30

Grades K-8 Reporting Steps: Collect total enrollment by day for all

classrooms within the grade level from first day of school until April 15• For combination classes, the grade level

with most number of students becomes the grade level of the class for QEIA purposes

Grades K-8 Reporting Steps: Sum the active daily enrollments and

divide the sum by the total number of class days through April 15.

The result is the average class size for the class for the year.

Grades 9-12 Reporting This is more complicated because there

are usually more multi-grade level classes Grade levels by core subjects have

different targets Different types of scheduling options –

such as block schedules and courses spanning less than the full year

Grades 9-12 Reporting Steps For each core course class within each

grade level• Calculate Active Monthly Enrollment

– Cumulative number of students enrolled each day divided by the number of instructional days in the month

Grades 9-12 Reporting Special Circumstances

Partial Year Course: When calculating active monthly enrollment adjust the number of instructional days if period is less than one month or a partial month

Elective Courses Non-core courses may not exceed the

ratio from 2005-06 (Monitoring will begin in 2010-11)

District Student Information Systems

Capable of providing class size reports for average daily enrollments

The Assistance Centers will be collecting and distributing information about how to use your student information system to produce necessary data

Class Size Reduction Reporting - Example

Monitoring at the end of 2008 - 09: Substantially Met

• 2 points – at least 1/3 of the way in meeting CSR requirement

• 1 point – at least 1/6 of the way in meeting the CSR requirement

• 0 points – less than 1/6 of the way in meeting the CSR requirement

Monitoring at the end of 2008 – 09:Middle School Example:

Grades

# of Classes required to meet 1/3 CSR target

# Met Average Daily Enrollment

1/3 Target

6th Grade 14 14

7th Grade 13 13

8th Grade 9 9 Rating

Total 36 36 2 points

2008-09 Implementation Plan: Reduce core subjects at grades 6-8 by 1/3

At least 1/3 of the way in

meeting CSR

requirement

Monitoring at the end of 2008 – 09:Middle School Example:

Grades

# of Classes required to meet 1/3 CSR target

# Met Average Daily Enrollment

1/3 TargetAt least 1/6 of

the way in CSR 6th Grade 14 9

7th Grade 13 10

8th Grade 9 7 Rating

Total 36 26 1 point

2008-09 Implementation Plan: Reduce core subjects at grades 6-8 by 1/3

Monitoring at the end of 2008 – 09:High School Example:

9th Grade

# of Classes required to

meet 1/3 CSR target

# Met Average Daily Enrollment Full Target

Less than 1/6 of the

way in meeting the

CSR requirement

English 10 5

Math 7 3

Science

History/SS 5 2 Rating

Total 30 14 0 points

2008-09 Implementation Plan: Full CSR at 9th grade

Reporting Findings Reporting Form Template Letter to District Letter to Superintendent of Public

Instruction

Intermission #2

10 minute break

E-mail questions to:

QEIATA@lacoe.edu

Unique Scenarios: The school reduced class size during

2005-06 using High Priority Grant funds. As a result, QEIA CSR targets have resulted in very low QEIA CSR targets.

Unique Scenarios: The school was reconfigured in the

base year and added 6th grade. As a result, the CSR target for 6th grade is very low.

Due to the complexity of CSR requirements it is essential to: Schedule Pre-Monitoring meetings with

districts and schools to establish CSR target agreements

Provide assistance with interim benchmarks and implementation plan

Provide information regarding required end of year documentation

QEIA Webcasts

SAVE THE DATE: November 17 QEIA Webcast: QEIA

Schools and Districts, County Office of Education QEIA Monitors, 1-4 pm

Resources

Monitoring Resources available at: www.ccsesa.org

Technical Assistance Tools available at: www.qeia.org

Thank You!

Superintendent Darline RoblesSouthern and Northern Technical

Assistance CentersLACOE technical and support staffCalifornia Teachers AssociationCalifornia Department of EducationCCSESA QEIA Workgroup

1 quality education investment act of 2006 (qeia) 1 quality education investment act (qeia) of 2006...

class size requirements

qeia csr class

class sizes

schoolwide average size

statute slide

funded schools

spi schools

school use

Documents

workforce investment act

quality education investment act of 2006 (qeia) principal...

quality education investment act of 2006 (qeia) 1 quality...

transportation investment act of 2010 final investment...

workforce investment act programs

citizenship by investment act regulations

workforce investment act goals

summary of senate bill 1133 (chapter 751, statutes of 2006)...

investment company act of 1940 - united states house of...

investment business act 2003 - bermuda laws laws/investment...

release-- investment advisers act

qeia and budgeting for class-size reduction april 2008...

investment company act notice: pacific investment management

2010-11 qeia monitoring ratings -...

amendment to foreign investment act

investment advisers act fed reg

investment canada act - ic.gc.ca

companies act - kenya investment authority

workforce investment act

workforce investment act