amp chapter 2

Upload: arun-sitaraman

Post on 04-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    1/21

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    C H A P T E R

    Defining the Competitive Set 2Key Question for This Chapter:Who do we or will we compete against?

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    2/21

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Major Topics for Ch. 2

    I. Bases of Competition

    II. Levels of Competition*

    III. Methods for Determining Competitors**

    IV. Right Level of Competition for You

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    3/21

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Bases of Competition

    I. Product-oriented ApproachSimilar Physical AttributesFunctional Similarity

    II. Customer-oriented ApproachWho they are competition for same budget

    When they use the productWhy they use the product - benefits sought

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    4/21

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Bases of Competition (cont).

    III. Marketing oriented: promotion &distribution

    - Media- Distribution

    IV. Resource-oriented Approach (Internal)

    - Raw materials- Employees- Financial resources

    III. Geographic: Becoming less relevant

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    5/21

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Levels of Competition

    Dietlemonlimes

    Baseballcards

    Fruitflavore

    d colas

    Coffee

    DietCoke

    DietPepsi

    Diet-Ritecola

    Bottledwater Lemonlimes

    Regularcolas

    Beer

    Juices

    Wine

    Fast food

    Tea

    Videorentals

    Icecream

    Product formcompetition:Diet colas

    Productcategorycompetition:Soft drinks

    Genericcompetition:Beverages

    Budgetcompetition:Food andentertainment

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    6/21

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Example 1: Energy Bar Competition

    Odwalla Power Bar

    Balance Bar Clif

    EnergyBars

    Snack/HealthBars

    Healthy Snacks

    Other Snacks

    Nutrigrain Bars Slimfast Bars Granola Bars

    FruitsNutsJuice

    CrackersChips

    Candy

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    7/21 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Example 2: Super-Premium Ice Cream

    Level of Competition

    Definition Competitors

    Product form Super-Premium Haagen-DazsStarbuck/GodivaBen & Jerrys

    Product category Ice cream Breyers Dreyers Private labels

    Generic Snacks

    DessertsNovelties

    Frito LayNabiscoNestlMrs. FieldsYoplait

    Budget Other supermarket,Convenience store products

    Many

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    8/21 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Example 3: PDA

    Level of Competition

    Definition Competitors Need Satisfied

    Product form Full-featured PDAs Palm Pilot VIIHandspringCompaq AeroPocket PC makers

    Personal informationmanagement plusintegratedcommunications

    Product category PIM (PersonalInformation Managers)

    Palm IIIRoyalCasio PV-100

    PIM only

    Generic Tablet PC/ Cell phones

    ToshibaNokiaSamsung

    Other solutions to theabove

    Budget$100-$1,000

    Paper-based solutionsBusiness items costing$100-$1000

    RolodexDay TimerFax MachinesPersonal copiersFurniture (e.g.Steelcase)

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    9/21 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Levels of Competition:Implications for Product Strategy

    Budget

    Generic

    ProductCategory

    ProductForm

    Competitive LevelConvince Customers that theBrand is Better than Others

    Convince Customers that theProduct Form is Best in the

    Category

    Convince Customers that theProduct Category is the Best

    Way to Satisfy Needs

    Convince Customers that theGeneric Benefits are the

    Most Appropriate Way toSpend their Money

    Product Management Task

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    10/21 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Methods for Determining Competitors*

    Existing categories: ex) IRI; SIC NAICSwww.census.gov/epcd/www/naics.html

    Managerial judgmentCustomer-purchase-based measuresCustomer-judgment-based measures

    http://www.census.gov/epcd/www/naics.htmlhttp://www.census.gov/epcd/www/naics.html
  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    11/21 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Managerial Judgment of Competition

    Markets Same DifferentProduct/Services

    Same

    Different

    A

    C

    B

    D

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    12/21 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Customer-purchase-based measures

    Brand Switching Data The Extent of Substitutability among BrandsCross-Elasticity of Demand:

    Change in Brand Bs Sales/Change in Brand As Price

    Mainly Used for Nondurable Products

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    13/21 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Brand-Switching Matrix

    Time t+1A B C D E

    A .6 .2 .2 0 0

    B .2 .3 .4 .1 0

    C .2 .3 .5 0 0

    D 0 .1 .1 .5 .3

    E .1 0 0 .4 .5

    Time t

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    14/21 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Customer-Judgment-Based Measures

    Overall similarity (by Perceptual Mapping)*Similarity of consideration sets

    Product deletion (based on productunavailability)Substitution In Use:

    List all the uses of a productList other products that provides the same uses

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    15/21 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Perceptual Mapping

    Means graphic description of customersperception about different brands/products.You can use it to gain

    Better understanding of market structureCustomer perceptions for a new product

    conceptDirection for R&D efforts to satisfy customersbetter

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    16/21 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Developing A Perceptual Map

    Two Alternative waysAttribute Rating method (AR)Overall Similarity method (OS)

    Attribute Rating MethodData Cube (brands*attributes*respondents)Statistical Analysis (Factor Analysis)Find out two (or three) axes for the perceptual mapAttribute AnalysisLimitations

    Suitable for B-to-B products

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    17/21 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Developing A Perceptual Map

    Overall Similarity method (OS)Suitable for consumer products and servicesAsk consumers perception the extent of similarity

    of pairs of items.Similarity Data Analysis (Multidimensional Scaling)You name the axes and infer the attributes

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    18/21 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Defining Competition with Perceptual Mappingexample: desserts

    MoistNeeds refrigeration

    Tapiocapudding mixLocal mix

    Pudding mix

    Chocolate torte mix

    D-zer ta Jell-O

    Canned pudding

    Individual pie

    Hostess cupcakes

    Quick bread mix

    Good for a coffee break

    As a formal dessert

    Homemade cake Bakery cake

    Homemade cookies

    Cheese cake mix

    Snackin Cake mix

    Frozen cake

    Layer cake mix

    Stirn Frost cake mix

    Takes a longtime to prepare

    Bundt cake mix

    Custard mix

    Boston crme pie mixLight Style cake mix

    Coffee cake mix

    Bakery cookies Pillsbury cookie dough

    Cookie mix

    Easy to carry with me In my school work lunch

    Between meal snack

    Pepperidge Farm cookies Oatmeal cookies

    Frozen pie

    Homemade pie

    Date bar mix Brownie mix

    Bakery pie

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    19/21 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Enterprise Competition in Financial Services

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    20/21

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

    Two Key Things to Remember

    I. How would you determine competition?

    II. Choose the focal level of competition*

  • 7/31/2019 AMP Chapter 2

    21/21

    M G Hill/I i 2002 Th M G Hill C i I All Ri h R d

    Right Level of Competition for You

    I. Your Firms Market Position

    II. Time Horizon

    III. Product Life Cycle and Technology Change

    IV. Your Position in the Firm