american society of hematology annual...

1
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING ● DECEMBER 8-11, 2012 ABSTRACT #1795 Phase 1b Study of TRU-016, an Anti-CD37 SMIP™ Protein, in Combination with Bendamustine in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Farrukh Awan 1 , Ulrich Jäger 2 , Robert Rifkin 3 , Michael Thirman 4 , John C. Byrd 5 , Michael Hallek 6 , Scott Stromatt 7 , John M. Pagel 8 1 Georgia Health Sciences University, Augusta, GA; 2 Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Vienna, Austria; 3 Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; , 4 The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; 5 The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; 6 University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 7 Emergent Product Development, Seattle, WA; 8 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA Introduction CD37 is a tetraspanin protein expressed on the surface of normal and transformed B-cells across a wide range of maturational stages and demonstrates death signaling via SHP1. TRU-016 is a novel humanized anti-CD37 SMIP™ (mono-specific protein therapeutic). In preclinical in vitro and in vivo models of NHL significant activity of TRU-016 against multiple cell lines was observed. In preclinical models, TRU-016 has shown: significantly greater direct killing of CLL cells than rituximab. greater Fc mediated cellular cytotoxicity of CLL cells than either alemtuzumab or rituximab. In a phase 1 study, TRU-016 activity in patients with CLL and NHL was observed. This trial of TRU-016 with bendamustine was conducted in patients with relapsed CLL to establish maximum tolerated dose overall safety clinical activity Figure 1. TRU-016 Targets CD37 on B cells Study Design Protocol Design Phase 1b Dose escalation MTD determination based on incidence of DLT in Cycle 1 Safety of TRU-016 and bendamustine N=12 Phase 2 (ongoing, results not reported here) Randomized controlled trial TRU-016 and bendamustine vs. bendamustine alone Compare efficacy and safety Stratified del[17p13.1] or TP53 mutation CIRS >6 or ≤6 CrCl <60 or ≥60 Treatment TRU-016 is dosed over six 28-day cycles. Dosing is weekly for the first 2 cycles, then on Day 1 and 15 of the next 4 cycles. Bendamustine is dosed on Day 1 and 2 of each cycle. Prophylactic use of growth factors was prohibited during the first cycle. Premedication included acetaminophen, diphenhydramine, and hydrocortisone. Figure 2. Study Design: Phase 1b, Dose Escalation Entry Criteria Relapsed CLL with 1 to 3 prior treatments Demonstrated active disease requiring treatment No prior bendamustine treatment Not refractory to fludarabine or other purines, either as a single agent or in combination. Refractory defined as lack of response to therapy or relapse <6 months after treatment completed. Age ≥18 years Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≤2 Serum creatinine, total bilirubin, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), serum gluta- mate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) of ≤2.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN) ANC ≥1,200/mm 3 (≥1,200/μL) Platelets ≥75,000/mm 3 (≥75,000/μL) Lymphocytes ≥5,000/mm 3 (≥5,000/μL) in Phase 1b No rituximab (RTX) in prior 30 days or alemtuzumab within prior 12 weeks No previous anticancer therapy in prior 30 days No investigational drug in prior 30 days Must have negative serology for HIV, HCV, or HBV Efficacy Endpoints ORR and CR rate by 2008 IWCLL and 1996 NCI Working Group criteria Resolution of disease related symptoms Table 1. Summary of Baseline Characteristics Characteristic 15 mg/kg 20 mg/kg Total Enrolled (n) 6 6 12 Age, median, yrs (range) 67 (57-74) 68.5 (54-81) 67 (54-81) Median Time since first Diagnosis yrs (range) 7 (2-13) 4 (1-8) 5 (1-13) Bulky Adenopathy, n (≥7 cm by CT) 1 4 5 Refractory to last treatment, n 2 1 3 Refractory to anti-CD20*, n 2 1 3 Rai Stage, III & IV, n 2 1 3 Number of Previous Treatments 1 2 1 5 6 0 7 5 Time since last CLL Treatment <6 months 6-12 months >12 months 2 0 4 1 1 4 3 1 8 Previous regimens with anti-CD20 1 2 4 2 6 0 10 2 Hgb <11 g/dL, n 3 1 3 Platelets <100 (10/μL), n 2 1 3 Drugs and regimens received previously (n) Fludarabine / rituximab Fludarabine / cyclophosphamide / rituximab Fludarabine / cyclophosphamide Rituximab 2 2 2 3 4 2 0 0 6 4 2 3 *Defined as anti-CD20 treatment <6 months prior to study entry. Efficacy Results Table 2. Patient Characteristics and Response Patient Age Sex Fit / Unfit* Bulky Disease (≥7 cm) Rai Stage at Screening Prior Lines of Therapy # of Cycles of TRU-016 Best Response (reason for discontinuation) Response per NCI Criteria Duration of Response per NCI Criteria** Node Measurement (SPD) by CT scan (cm 3 ) Response per IWCLL Baseline 2 months after EOT Cohort 1: 15 mg/kg TRU-016 1201 69 M Fit No IV 1 3 CR (neutropenia) CR >17 mo 20 No CT No CT 1202 69 M Unfit No I 2 1 PR (autoimmune hemolytic anemia) DC’d Early 30 No CT No CT 1601 57 M Fit No II 2 6 CR CR >16 mo 30 5 PR 1602 65 F Fit No II 2 6 PR PR 11 mo 38 13 PR 1603 64 F Unfit Yes II 2 4 PR (investigator discretion) DC’d Early 247 No CT No CT 1604 74 M Unfit No III 2 6 PR PR >15 mo 45 8 PR Cohort 2: 20 mg/kg TRU-016 1001 62 M Unfit Yes I 1 6 PR PR 14.3 mo 126 20 PR 1203 78 M Unfit Yes II 1 6 CR CR 10.5 mo 48 No CT No CT 1606 54 F Unfit No II 1 6 PR PR >11 mo 37 3 PR 1607 75 M Unfit No I 1 6 CR CR >10 mo 20 4 PR 2101 81 F Unfit Yes I 1 3 PR (neutropenia) PR >11 mo 121 29 PR 8001 56 M Fit Yes IV 1 6 PR PR 4.5 mo 253 180 SD *Fit = CIRS ≤ 6 and CrCL ≥ 60 mL/min; Unfit = CIRS > 6 and/or CrCL< 60 mL/min **Follow up ongoing SPD = sum of product diameters Figure 3. Absolute Lymphocyte Count 15 mg/kg Figure 4. Absolute Lymphocyte Count 20 mg/kg Figure 5. Maximum % Reduction in Target Lesions by CT scan (SPD) Figure 6. TRU-016 Serum Concentrations vs Time 15 mg/kg 20 mg/kg Mean Half Life (T ½ ), days (SD) 12.1 (1.5) 10.28 (3.0) Mean C max , ug/mL (SD) 896.21 (212.0) 1031.53 (311.5) AUC all , day*ug/mL (SD) 60785 (36646) 79126 (34286) Response Best response at any time according to the investigator was 100% ORR with 33% CR 9/12 responses occurred at Cycle 1 assessment NCI response: For all patients the ORR was 83% (10/12) and CR 33% (4/12). The median duration of response is >11 months as patients are still in follow-up. IWCLL response: CT results were available for 8 patients and 7 had PR and 1 had SD. The 4 CRs by NCI criteria were not confirmed by IWCLL criteria for the following reasons: 1201 did not have a repeat CT scan; 1601 had one node measuring 1.6 cm; 1203 had delayed CT 5 months after end of treatment and had progression; 1607 had one node 1.8 cm. There is no apparent dose response relationship. Safety Figure 7. Adverse Events Reported by ≥3 Subjects Regardless of Causality (15 mg and 20 mg combined) Table 3. Number of Patients with Grade 3/4 Adverse Events 15 mg/kg N=6 20 mg/kg N=6 Total N=12 Neutropenia 3 3 6 Febrile neutropenia 2 1 3 Fatigue 0 1 1 Pyrexia 1 0 1 Dyspnea 1 0 1 Autoimmune hemolytic anemia 1 0 1 Myopathy 1 0 1 Leukopenia 0 1 1 Pneumonia 1 0 1 Urinary tract infection 1 0 1 Adverse Events Most events were grade 1 and 2. Grade 3 and 4 events considered related to TRU-016 and bendamustine were neutropenia (5 patients); febrile neutropenia (2 patients), and urinary tract infection (1 patient). 9 serious adverse events were reported by 4 patients. Serious adverse events in 3 patients were considered possibly related to TRU-016 and bendamustine by the investigators; febrile neutropenia in 2 patients and urinary tract infection in 1 patient. No apparent dose relationship for toxicity. Conclusions TRU-016 in combination with bendamustine was well tolerated. The combination produced a response in the majority of patients. The Phase 2 trial comparing TRU-016 with bendamustine vs. bendamustine is ongoing. TRU-016 is being studied in combination with rituximab in an ongoing frontline CLL trial. 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 14 28 42 56 70 84 98 112 126 140 154 168 Lymphocytes, Absolute (10 3 /µL) Study Day 1201 1202 1601 1602 1603 1604 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 0 14 28 42 56 70 84 98 112 126 140 154 168 Lymphocytes, Absolute (10 3 /µL) Study Day 1001 1203 1606 1607 2101 8001 TRU-016 15 mg/kg and Bendamustine 70 mg/m 2 N=6 TRU-016 20 mg/kg and Bendamustine 70 mg/m 2 N=6 Follow up to 18 months DLT ≤ 1 so dose was escalated. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Maximun % Reduc.on in Target Lesion 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 nausea neutropenia cough anaemia decreased appe9te headache hypokaelemia pain in extremity pruri9s pyrexia cons9pa9on diarrhea dry mouth fa9gue febrile neutropenia % Grade 1/2 Grade 3/4 Conflict Of Interest Disclosures Scott Stromatt is an employee of Emergent Product Development. Ulrich Jaeger is a consultant and received research funding from Emergent Product Development. There are no other relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Upload: vuonghanh

Post on 18-Feb-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY ANNUAL …aptevotherapeutics.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/16201-Phase-1... · AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING DECEMBER 8-11, 2012 ABSTRACT

 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING ● DECEMBER 8-11, 2012  ABSTRACT #1795

Phase 1b Study of TRU-016, an Anti-CD37 SMIP™ Protein,  in Combination with Bendamustine in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaFarrukh Awan1, Ulrich Jäger2, Robert Rifkin3, Michael Thirman4, John C. Byrd5, Michael Hallek6, Scott Stromatt7, John M. Pagel8 1 Georgia Health Sciences University, Augusta, GA; 2 Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Vienna, Austria; 3 Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; , 4 The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; 5 The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; 6 University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 7 Emergent Product Development, Seattle, WA; 8 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA

Introduction

— CD37 is a tetraspanin protein expressed on the surface of normal and transformed B-cells across  a wide range of maturational stages and demonstrates death signaling via SHP1. 

— TRU-016 is a novel humanized anti-CD37 SMIP™ (mono-specific protein therapeutic).

— In preclinical in vitro and in vivo models of NHL significant activity of TRU-016 against multiple cell lines was observed. In preclinical models, TRU-016 has shown:

– significantly greater direct killing of CLL cells than rituximab.

– greater Fc mediated cellular cytotoxicity of CLL cells than either alemtuzumab or rituximab.

— In a phase 1 study, TRU-016 activity in patients with CLL and NHL was observed. 

— This trial of TRU-016 with bendamustine was conducted in patients with relapsed CLL to establish

– maximum tolerated dose

– overall safety

– clinical activity

Figure 1. TRU-016 Targets CD37 on B cells

Study Design

Protocol Design

Phase 1b

— Dose escalation 

— MTD determination based on incidence of DLT in Cycle 1

— Safety of TRU-016 and bendamustine

— N=12

Phase 2 (ongoing, results not reported here)

— Randomized controlled trial

— TRU-016 and bendamustine vs. bendamustine alone

— Compare efficacy and safety

— Stratified

– del[17p13.1] or TP53 mutation

– CIRS >6 or ≤6

– CrCl <60 or ≥60 

Treatment

— TRU-016 is dosed over six 28-day cycles. Dosing is weekly for the first 2 cycles, then on Day 1   and 15 of the next 4 cycles. Bendamustine is dosed on Day 1 and 2 of each cycle.

— Prophylactic use of growth factors was prohibited during the first cycle.

— Premedication included acetaminophen, diphenhydramine, and hydrocortisone.

Figure 2. Study Design: Phase 1b, Dose Escalation

Entry Criteria

— Relapsed CLL with 1 to 3 prior treatments

— Demonstrated active disease requiring treatment 

— No prior bendamustine treatment

— Not refractory to fludarabine or other purines, either as a single agent or in combination. Refractory defined as lack of response to therapy or relapse <6 months after treatment completed.

— Age ≥18 years

— Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≤2

— Serum creatinine, total bilirubin, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), serum gluta-mate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) of ≤2.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN)

— ANC ≥1,200/mm3 (≥1,200/μL)

— Platelets ≥75,000/mm3 (≥75,000/μL)

— Lymphocytes ≥5,000/mm3 (≥5,000/μL) in Phase 1b

— No rituximab (RTX) in prior 30 days or alemtuzumab within prior 12 weeks

— No previous anticancer therapy in prior 30 days

— No investigational drug in prior 30 days

— Must have negative serology for HIV, HCV, or HBV

Efficacy Endpoints

— ORR and CR rate by 2008 IWCLL and 1996 NCI Working Group criteria

— Resolution of disease related symptoms

Table 1. Summary of Baseline Characteristics

Characteristic 15 mg/kg 20 mg/kg Total

Enrolled (n) 6 6 12

Age, median, yrs (range) 67 (57-74) 68.5 (54-81) 67 (54-81)

Median Time since first Diagnosis yrs (range) 7 (2-13) 4 (1-8) 5 (1-13)

Bulky Adenopathy, n (≥7 cm by CT) 1 4 5

Refractory to last treatment, n 2 1 3

Refractory to anti-CD20*, n 2 1 3

Rai Stage, III & IV, n 2 1 3

Number of Previous Treatments

  1   2

1 5

6 0

7 5

Time since last CLL Treatment

  <6 months   6-12 months   >12 months

2 0 4

1 1 4

3 1 8

Previous regimens with anti-CD20

  1   2

4 2

6 0

10 2

Hgb <11 g/dL, n 3 1 3

Platelets <100 (10/μL), n 2 1 3

Drugs and regimens received previously (n)

  Fludarabine / rituximab   Fludarabine / cyclophosphamide / rituximab   Fludarabine / cyclophosphamide   Rituximab

2 2 2 3

4 2 0 0

6 4 2 3

*Defined as anti-CD20 treatment < 6 months prior to study entry.

Efficacy Results

Table 2. Patient Characteristics and Response

Pati

en

t

Ag

e

Sex

Fit

/ U

nfi

t*

Bu

lky D

isease

(≥

7 c

m)

Rai

Sta

ge

at

Scr

een

ing

Pri

or

Lin

es

o

f Th

era

py

# o

f C

ycl

es

o

f TR

U-0

16

Best

Resp

on

se

(rea

son f

or

dis

continuat

ion)

Resp

on

se p

er

NC

I C

rite

ria

Du

rati

on

of

R

esp

on

se p

er

NC

I C

rite

ria*

*

Node Measurement

(SPD) by CT scan (cm3)

Resp

on

se

per

IWC

LL

Base

lin

e

2 m

on

ths

aft

er

EO

T

Cohort 1: 15 mg/kg TRU-016

1201 69 M Fit No IV 1 3 CR (neutropenia) CR >17 mo 20 No CT No CT

1202 69 M Unfit No I 2 1 PR (autoimmune 

hemolytic anemia)DC’d Early  30 No CT No CT

1601 57 M Fit No II 2 6 CR CR >16 mo 30 5 PR

1602 65 F Fit No II 2 6 PR PR 11 mo 38 13 PR

1603 64 F Unfit Yes II 2 4 PR (investigator  discretion)

DC’d Early  247 No CT No CT

1604 74 M Unfit No III 2 6 PR PR >15 mo 45 8 PR

Cohort 2: 20 mg/kg TRU-016

1001 62 M Unfit Yes I 1 6 PR PR 14.3 mo 126 20 PR

1203 78 M Unfit Yes II 1 6 CR CR 10.5 mo 48 No CT No CT

1606 54 F Unfit No II 1 6 PR PR >11 mo 37 3 PR

1607 75 M Unfit No I 1 6 CR CR >10 mo 20 4 PR

2101 81 F Unfit Yes I 1 3 PR (neutropenia) PR >11 mo 121 29 PR

8001 56 M Fit Yes IV 1 6 PR PR 4.5 mo 253 180 SD

 *Fit = CIRS ≤ 6 and CrCL ≥ 60 mL/min; Unfit = CIRS > 6 and/or CrCL< 60 mL/min 

**Follow up ongoing

  SPD = sum of product diameters

Figure 3. Absolute Lymphocyte Count 15 mg/kg

Figure 4. Absolute Lymphocyte Count 20 mg/kg

Figure 5. Maximum % Reduction in Target Lesions by CT scan (SPD)

Figure 6. TRU-016 Serum Concentrations vs Time

15 mg/kg 20 mg/kg

Mean Half Life (T ½), days (SD) 12.1 (1.5) 10.28 (3.0)

Mean Cmax, ug/mL (SD) 896.21 (212.0) 1031.53 (311.5)

AUCall, day*ug/mL (SD) 60785 (36646) 79126 (34286)

Response

— Best response at any time according to the investigator was 100% ORR with 33% CR

— 9/12 responses occurred at Cycle 1 assessment

— NCI response: For all patients the ORR was 83% (10/12) and CR 33% (4/12). The median duration of response is >11 months as patients are still in follow-up.

— IWCLL response: CT results were available for 8 patients and 7 had PR and 1 had SD. The 4 CRs by NCI criteria were not confirmed by IWCLL criteria for the following reasons: 1201 did not have a repeat CT scan; 1601 had one node measuring 1.6 cm; 1203 had delayed CT 5 months after end of treatment and had progression; 1607 had one node 1.8 cm.

— There is no apparent dose response relationship.

Safety

Figure 7. Adverse Events Reported by ≥3 Subjects Regardless of Causality (15 mg and 20 mg combined)

Table 3. Number of Patients with Grade 3/4 Adverse Events

15 mg/kg N=6

20 mg/kg N=6

Total N=12

Neutropenia 3 3 6

Febrile neutropenia 2 1 3

Fatigue 0 1 1

Pyrexia 1 0 1

Dyspnea 1 0 1

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia 1 0 1

Myopathy 1 0 1

Leukopenia 0 1 1

Pneumonia 1 0 1

Urinary tract infection 1 0 1

Adverse Events

— Most events were grade 1 and 2. 

— Grade 3 and 4 events considered related to TRU-016 and bendamustine were neutropenia  (5 patients); febrile neutropenia (2 patients), and urinary tract infection (1 patient).

— 9 serious adverse events were reported by 4 patients.

— Serious adverse events in 3 patients were considered possibly related to TRU-016 and bendamustine by the investigators; febrile neutropenia in 2 patients and urinary tract infection in 1 patient. 

— No apparent dose relationship for toxicity.

Conclusions

— TRU-016 in combination with bendamustine was well tolerated. 

— The combination produced a response in the majority of patients.  

— The Phase 2 trial comparing TRU-016 with bendamustine vs. bendamustine is ongoing.

— TRU-016 is being studied in combination with rituximab in an ongoing frontline CLL trial.

0  

50  

100  

150  

200  

250  

300  

0   14  

28  

42  

56  

70  

84  

98  

112  

126  

140  

154  

168  

Lym

ph

ocy

tes,

Ab

solu

te (

10

3/µ

L)

Study Day

1201  

1202  

1601  

1602  

1603  

1604  

0  

20  

40  

60  

80  

100  

120  

140  

0   14  

28  

42  

56  

70  

84  

98  

112  

126  

140  

154  

168  

Lym

ph

ocy

tes,

Ab

solu

te (

10

3/µ

L)

Study Day

1001  1203  1606  1607  2101  8001  

TRU-016 15 mg/kg and Bendamustine 70 mg/m2

N=6

TRU-016 20 mg/kg and Bendamustine 70 mg/m2

N=6

Follow up to 18 months

DLT ≤ 1 so dose was escalated. 

-­‐100%  

-­‐90%  

-­‐80%  

-­‐70%  

-­‐60%  

-­‐50%  

-­‐40%  

-­‐30%  

-­‐20%  

-­‐10%  

0%  

Maxim

un  %  Red

uc.on

 in  Target  Lesion  

0   10   20   30   40   50   60   70  

nausea  

neutropenia  

cough  

anaemia  

decreased  appe9te  

headache  

hypokaelemia  

pain  in  extremity  

pruri9s  

pyrexia  

cons9pa9on  

diarrhea  

dry  mouth  

fa9gue  

febrile  neutropenia  

%  

Grade  1/2  

Grade  3/4  

Conflict Of Interest Disclosures

Scott Stromatt is an employee of Emergent Product Development. Ulrich Jaeger is a consultant and received research  funding from Emergent Product Development. There are no other relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.