american recovery and reinvestment act of 2009 data quality & recordkeeping avoiding reporting...

54
Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Post on 15-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Data Quality & RecordkeepingAvoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Data Quality & RecordkeepingAvoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Page 2: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Audio is available via the internetPlease be sure your— speakers are on & your volume turned up

Sound Check

Page 3: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Speakers Speakers

Risk Management Service

David Cattin

Otis Wilson

David Downey

Cynthia Brown

Page 4: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Introduction

Page 5: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Transparency & Accountability

• Efficient• Economical• Effective• Ethical• Equitable

Federal Funding Accountability & Transparency Act

Page 6: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

What is Transparency?

A tool to promote results & accountability– Accurate data – Presented in context– Meaningful information – Accessible & easy for public use

`

Page 7: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Treatment of Recovery Act Funds

Recordkeeping processes and procedures for ARRA funds follow the same guidelines, rules and regulations that apply to other ED grants

Page 8: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

REPORT FRAUD AND MISCONDUCT TO THE ED OIG

All ARRA grants include “the requirement that each grantee or sub-grantee awarded funds made available under the Recovery Act shall promptly refer to an appropriate inspector general any credible evidence that a principal, employee, agent, contractor, sub-grantee, sub-contractor, or other person has submitted a false claim under the False Claims Act or has committed a criminal or civil violation of laws pertaining to fraud, conflict of interest, bribery, gratuity, or similar misconduct involving those funds.”

[email protected]

FAX 202-260-0230

Page 9: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Learning Objectives• Describe key reasons data quality is important• Know & apply data quality principles: quality,

objectivity, utility and integrity• Assess methodology for data collection• Identify & apply federal record retention requirements• Avoid reporting pitfalls identified by GAO• Implement best practices

Page 10: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Key Principles

Page 11: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Quality Encompassing term

Incorporates Objectivity, Integrity, Utility

Ensures usefulness, accuracy, reliable, secure

Integral to creation, collection, maintenance

ED reviews before dissemination

Page 12: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Objectivity

Accurate, reliable, unbiased infoUse dependable source & appropriate techniques

Include documentation

Describe any errors that impact quality

Page 13: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Integrity

Security and protection of info Ensure info is not:

CompromisedCorruptFalsified

Page 14: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Utility Usefulness of info to intended users

Stay informed of info needs Care during review stage to ensure clarity

1)General info – clear & readable2)Admin & Program Data – described & documented3)Statistical Data – fill data gaps

Page 15: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Methodology

Page 16: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Assessing Methodology

• Essential step in the project’s development • Preparation is key• Anticipate potential problem areas

- Address in the design phase

• Ensure consistency across the board• Communicate clearly with staff collecting and

recording data

Page 17: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Where Methodology Goes Wrong

• Problems by design

• Problems arising from human error

Determine just wherethey overlap and howto eliminate, reduce,negate their effects on reporting.

Design HumanError

Page 18: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Where Methodology Goes Wrong

• Fundamental design flaws

• Data collection mechanisms

• Documentation

• Connection with the target population

Page 19: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Design Concerns

• Determine most relevant time to collect data

• Define the data to be gathered

• Collect only the necessary data

• Limit the intervals between sampling

• Develop appropriate evaluation tools

• Train staff accordingly

Page 20: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Target Population Issues

• Follow Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and human subject research requirements to the letter• Utilize varied data collection strategies• Consider target population demographics• Create a non-threatening, non-intrusive environment to conduct interview, complete surveys, etc.

Page 21: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Recordkeeping

Page 22: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Three years from… Final expenditure report

Quarterly or annual financial report

Exceptions… Litigation, real property, record transfer, indirect

cost rate proposals, cost allocation plans

Record Retention Period

Page 23: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

AccessSecretary, IG, Comptroller General…

timely, unrestricted accessDOCUMENTS AND PERSONNEL

…audits, examinations, excerpts, transcripts, and copies.

…as long as the records are retained.

Page 24: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Types of Records

Grant funds

Compliance

Performance

Page 25: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Confidentiality & Privacy

Generally no restrictions on recipient records

Student records – covered by FERPA

Page 26: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Recovery Act Data Quality

Page 27: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Data Quality & ARRA Section 1512 Reports

• Section 1512 reporting presents new challenges for data collection and reporting

• Under the Federal Financial Accountability and Transparency Act – October 1st, 2010 sub-recipient reporting will become the norm

www.USAspending.gov

Page 28: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

#1 Section 1512 Pitfall -Failure to Report

• Quarterly reporting begins the quarter you first receive a grant (even before spending)

• Track ARRA funds separately • Need 100% of sub-recipients and contracts• Keep reporting until all funds expended &

activities complete• Then mark last report “FINAL”

Page 29: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

What’s Different with ARRA?

• Basic expenditure reporting• Reported funds “received”

should match G5 draws• Automate expenditure data –

pull from finance system • Keep records of your

methodology related to data collection and estimations

• Sub-recipient information• Subs may input their data• Subs must provide jobs

and infrastructure information

• Estimating # jobs created/retained

• Increased oversight• Public transparency

Page 30: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Avoiding Sub-recipient Reporting Pitfalls

• Collect consistent information from sub-recipientsProvide good instructions and definitions

• Collect complete and accurate information from eachKnow who should report & review their reports

• Validate sub-recipient data Extract or verify against finance system

• Ensure they maintain recordsProvide instructions on recordkeeping

• Monitor subs’ data collection and internal controls over reporting Provide guidance on good practices

Page 31: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Be careful what you ask for…

What you ask affects whether the answer will make sense•Carefully target data collection to the data you need •Carefully word the questions to get consistent & meaningful responses•Define terms and data elements •Provide the formula to use for calculations

Page 32: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Jobs Calculation Pitfalls• OMB established new guidance in December

2009 – count jobs funded by ARRA • Ensure all sub-recipients use the same

methodology• “Reality check” – Does the number of jobs

reported by sub-recipients and contractors make sense given their funds/activities? Does the total number reported for the grant make sense given the total amount of the grant?

Page 33: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Public Transparency

• Public access to information is a challenge• Present data in a way that is not misleading• Describe expenditures in a meaningful way –

explaining difference between “spent” i.e., obligated and “expenditure” i.e., federal funds have been drawn and disbursed

• Describe activities in a meaningful way • Expect questions – maintain records

Page 34: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

What Should Be Transparent?

• Raw data is insufficient • Present information in context

– Analyzed and summarized

• Mission-related information• Transparency that meets the goal

– Public accountability– Fraud detection and reporting– Public participation and feedback

Graphic by Steve Gunn

Page 35: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Public Transparency –Tell the whole story

• Expenditure reports “iPods”• New reports, public

complaints, Congressional investigation

• Not about iTunes –iPods have instructional purposes

• Public won’t know that unless reports specify it

Page 36: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Even if not required, it may be a good idea to provide some explanation of the type of service procured on some contracts: •Travel expenses•Restaurant bills •Recreation parks•Tiffany

More Questionable Reports…

Page 37: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Pitfall Patrol• The public • The press• Stakeholder groups• The Recovery Accountability &Transparency

Board• U.S. Government Accountability Office• ED’s Office of Inspector General

Page 38: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

ED OIG Internal Controls Review

• Found many agencies should strengthen controls over ARRA reporting requirements – Procedures to collect, review and report data

including assignment of individual responsibilities– Clear guidance to sub-recipients & contractors– Methodology for estimating jobs created/saved– Use existing systems to extent possible– Modify existing systems or procedures if they fall

short of new needs

Page 39: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

ARRA Recordkeeping Findings

US GAO and ED OIG auditing internal controls over data and reporting

Have established written proceduresEstablish and execute data quality review

proceduresMaintain documentation of guidance and

instructions to staff, sub-recipients and contractorsMaintain data used to calculate jobs

created/retained

Page 40: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

GAO Concerns Raised ARRA Section 1512 reports

Nov 2009 findings: • Erroneous and questionable data entry• Lack of data quality review• Issues in calculation of FTEs for jobs

created/retained

Page 41: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Erroneous Data EntryGAO found: • Misidentification of awarding agencies• Implausible dollar amounts• Discrepancies between actual award amounts and reports received

Actions:

1) Check CFDA #, the Federal Agency Codes and Treasury Account Symbol (TAS)

2) “Reality Check”– Does data make sense?

3) Verify data against other sources, i.e., finance system

Page 42: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Lack of a Quality Review

GAO found: • Issues in 10% of recipient reports• 75% of the prime reports were marked as

undergoing review by federal agency• Less than 1% were marked as undergoing a

review by the prime recipientAction:

1) Prime recipient is responsible for accuracy and completeness of sub-recipients’ reports

Page 43: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Properly Calculating FTEs

GAO found:• Problems with interpreting OMB guidance• Lack of consistency in applying measurements• Variations in length of time reportedActions:

1) Use OMB’s simplified guidance http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-08.pdf (page 13)

2) ED’s clarifying guidance for summer employment (forthcoming)

Page 44: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

OMB-Identified Common Mistakes

• Duplicate awards• Incorrect award IDs • Changes to key elements• ‘Extra’ reporting• Non-reporting

– In current quarter– In subsequent quarter

Page 45: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Challenges to Transparency

Agencies concerns:• Data correct? • Report misinterpreted?• Major collection

burden?• Need technology?• Need expertise?

Page 46: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

SpeakersSpeakers

Todd StephensonOffice of Elementary & Secondary Education

Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs

Rebecca WalawenderOffice of Special Education & Rehabilitative Services

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

Page 47: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Questions

AnswersFurther Recovery Act questions- ED contact listed on the Grant Award Notification or,email [email protected]

Page 48: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Thank you for participating!Please complete an evaluation—

Your feedback is important. http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/leg/recovery/rms-web-conferences.html

Page 49: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Resource DocumentsNew FFATA Requirements

• October 1, 2010 grantees will start reporting data on sub-recipients (grants and contracts) for all federal grants -- USASpending.gov

• OMB instructions to the agencies at:http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/open_gov/OpenGovernmentDirective_04062010.pdf

Page 50: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Resource: Section 1512 Reporting Registration Tips from OMB

It is the recipients’ responsibility to ensure that their CCR information is up-to-date and that their registration is active and will remain active throughout the reporting cycle. CCR registrations must be renewed at least every 12 months or the registration expires preventing a recipient from submitting a report in FederalReporting.gov until the registration is re-instated. Because re-instating an expired registration requires specific recipient actions to protect the security of the record, processing time, and additional time to update FederalReporting.gov, recipients should check their CCR registration prior to the beginning of each reporting cycle. Maintaining current Points of Contact in their CCR record will assure recipients that CCR renewal reminders are received.

It is the recipient’s responsibility to ensure that that their D-U-N-S number and entity record is accurate and active with Dun and Bradstreet (D&B). While D-U-N-S numbers don’t expire, Dun and Bradstreet (D&B) does conduct routine and continuous data maintenance and outreach to verify operations at a location. When operations cannot be verified for a particular D-U-N-S number, D&B may flag the D-U-N-S number “inactive,” which could interfere with successful reporting. It is also important that the information about your entity is accurate when used to report on government websites. In order to lookup, review or modify a record at D&B, or request a D-U-N-S number altogether, recipients may use the following two free resources:

Recipients may utilize the self-service webform at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. This application allows a recipient to lookup their D-U-N-S Number, review the data on file, request changes if necessary, or request a new D-U-N-S number if one does not already exist.

Recipients may call (866) 705-5711 to verify that a D-U-N-S number is active and confirm other details about their entity.

Page 51: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Resource Documents

GAO-10-224T - Recipient Reported Jobs Data Provide Some Insight into Use of Recovery Act Funding, but Data Quality and Reporting Issues Need Attention http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10224t.pdf

Circular A-133 - Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizationshttp://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/rewrite/circulars/a133/a133.html

Circular A-133 – Compliance Supplementhttp://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/omb/circulars/a133_compliance/04/ed.pdf

Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies; Notice; Republication http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg/reproducible2.pdf

Page 52: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

Resource Documents

Data Quality Campaign – Using Data to Improve Student Achievement http://www.dataqualitycampaign.org/

U.S. Department of Education OIG – The Department’s Process to Ensure Data Quality Under the Reporting Requirements of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 – Final Audit Report http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oig/auditreports/fy2010/a19j0004.pdf

GAO-10-224T - Recipient Reported Jobs Data Provide Some Insight into Use of Recovery Act Funding, but Data Quality and Reporting Issues Need Attention http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10224t.pdf

Government Business Council, 2010: Open Government: Achieving Transparency within Federal Agencies http://www.govexec.com/gbc/

Page 53: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

ARRA Contact Information

State Fiscal Stabilization Fund [email protected]

Title I, Part A Grants to [email protected]

School Improvement Grants [email protected]

Educational Technology - Enhancing Education Through [email protected] IDEA, Parts B & C

[email protected] Voc-Rehab, Independent Living Services & Centers for Independent Living

[email protected]

Page 54: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Data Quality & Recordkeeping Avoiding Reporting Pitfalls

ARRA Contact Information Impact Aid

[email protected] State Longitudinal Data [email protected] Quality Partnership [email protected] Incentive [email protected]

ED-OIG Hotline [email protected], 1-800-MIS-USED

General Info: 1-800-USA-LEARN (1-800-872-5327)

For archived and future web conferences: http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/leg/recovery/web-conferences.html#schedule