american association of highway engineerscarolinatriangle.ashe.pro/wordpress/wp-content/... ·...
TRANSCRIPT
American Society of Highway Engineers
University Club
November 14th, 2019
12 - 4:30 PM
2019 Fall Technical Seminar
Safety Moment
Agenda• Registration: 12:00 pm
• Lunch & Opening (Networking Session): 12:30 – 1:15 pm
• Presentation Sessions: 1:15 – 4:30 pm
• Adjourn: 4:30 pm
• Dinner Meeting tonight• Social Hour: 5:30 – 6:30 pm
• Dinner/Meeting: 6:30 – 8:30 pm
Agenda
http://2020conference.ashe.pro/
National Conference in Raleigh: June 3 – 7, 2020
Questions email Drew Joyner at [email protected] or Brian Lusk at [email protected]
Agenda• Presentation 1: 1:15 – 2:00 pm
NCDOT Project Scoping Process
Derrick Lewis, P.E., Unit Head, Feasibility Studies Unit, NCDOT
Description: The feasibility studies process has undergone changes in the past few years. We will look into current Express Design and Project Scoping Report processes implemented for feasibility studies.
Questions: 10-15 minutes
Agenda• Presentation 2: 2:00 – 2:45 pm
NCDOT Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)
Derrick Weaver, P.E., CPM, Unit Head, Environmental Policy Unit, NCDOT
Description: A update on the IPD process will be provided. We will also explore tools for streamlining the process from concept through construction using the latest technology and information available.
Questions: 10-15 minutes
• Break: 2:45 pm
Agenda• Presentation 3: 3:00 – 3:45 pm
Project ATLAS Updates
Eric Wilson, GISP GeoDecisions, A Division of Gannett Fleming
Ryan Arthur, Data Analyst, NCDOT
Description: We will provide an update on the Project ATLAS program and provide latest new and information regarding deployment of this screening tool.
Questions: 10-15 minutes
Agenda• Presentation 4: 3:45 – 4:30 pm
2D Hydraulic Modeling and Visualization
Crystal Moore, Senior Designer, Dewberry
Description: Explain 2D flow modeling on transportation projects and learn about why this modeling is becoming a major resource for riverine analysis. A 2D flow model demonstration will be provided.
Questions: 10-15 minutes
• Adjourn: 4:30 pm
Feasibility Studies, Express Design Evaluations, & Project Scoping Reports
ASHE Fall 2019 Tech TrainingDerrick Lewis, PE
Agenda
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
Overview
Feasibility Studies
Express Design Evaluation
Project Scoping Reports
Questions
2
3
What is a Feasibility Study?
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
A Feasibility Study is a preliminary engineering and funding evaluation of a
candidate State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Project. It is the initial step in the planning and design process and not the
product of exhaustive environmental or design studies.
4
What is the Purpose?
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
The purpose of the feasibility study is to describe the proposed scope of improvements, provide the associated costs and impacts, and identify potential concerns or problems within
the project area.
5
How is it different from a
STIP Project?
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
A Feasibility Study is a high-level engineering study that develops conceptual designs of potential improvements in order
to determine the anticipated costs and impacts for programming purposes.
Once programmed it becomes a STIP project in which the department performs exhaustive environmental and design
studies as well as comprehensive public involvement to satisfy the National/State Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA) planning process and complete the ultimate design to be
implemented in the construction phase.
6
What are the Pros & Cons of a
Feasibility Study?
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
Pros: Provides preliminary cost and design data without the expense of a full study. A Feasibility Study gives enough
information to make an educated decision on prioritizing and programming a project.
Cons: It is only a conceptual design with minimal public input and without environmental field studies. The cost estimates are
preliminary and not a definite answer of what it will cost as other issues may arise during later planning and design stages.
7
STI Law
As a result of the Strategic Transportation Investments Law (STI) prioritization process, a majority of new project requests are to upgrade existing facilities
A substantial increase in the volume of candidate project requests being submitted with little to no formal evaluation or support documentation
In order to accomplish the efficient review of these candidate projects, a new methodology was required to clarify the scope of projects and provide more accurate cost estimates
A new two-step process has been created to fulfill these needs: Express Design Evaluation and Project Scoping Report
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
Overview
8
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
OverviewWhat the process IS:
Initial step in the planning and design process for a candidate project
Describes the project, estimates preliminary costs, and identifies any potential problems
Investigates conceptual design option(s) and prepares costs needed for the prioritization process (SPOT)
9AN alternative, not THE alternative
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
Overview
What the process is NOT:Detailed engineering
In-depth data collection or field studies
NEPA/SEPA compliance documentation
10
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
11
DISCLAIMER:
The Project Scoping Process is NOT intended to satisfy NEPA/SEPA requirements for a project, nor
be an exhaustive investigation of design and environmental issues. Appropriate NEPA/SEPA
documentation must be completed during the project development phase of a project before the project
will be approved for right-of-way acquisition or construction.
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
Overview
Overview
12
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
Express Design Evaluation
13
Express Design Evaluation• Project Initiation
• Conceptual Designs & Quantities
• Cost Estimates Express Design Submittal
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
Project Initiation
Data Collection & Environmental Features Map
Preliminary Coordination with Key StakeholdersDivision and Metropolitan/Rural Planning
Organization (MPO/RPO)NCDOT-Project Management Unit (PMU) and
Environmental Policy Unit (EPU)Others NCDOT Units as appropriate
14
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
Express Design Evaluation | Project Scoping
Conceptual Design &
Quantities
15
Based on input from preliminary coordination, develop conceptual design option(s)Horizontal DesignVertical DesignSlope StakesRight-of-WayMaintenance of
Traffic
Express Design Evaluation | Project Scoping
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
Mapping Limits
16
Mapping LimitsDevelop initial mapping limits based on the express
design conceptMapping Limits Mapping Products
Intersections 25’-50' outside outer limits of existing/proposed Right-of-Way
200' beyond proposed project termini
1"=50' Final Surveys
Interchange Projects
Widening Projects
100' outside outer limits of proposed/existing Right-of-Way
500' beyond proposed project termini
1"=50' Shell Plan Sheets
New Locations Projects
500' outside outer limits of existing/proposed Right-of-Way for all options
1000' beyond proposed project termini
1"=100' Topographic Mapping (with multiple options) or1"=50' Shell Plan Sheets (with selected corridor)
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
Express Design Evaluation | Project Scoping
17
Cost Estimates
Construction, Utilities, & Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)
Right-of-Way
Other major cost items
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
Express Design Evaluation | Project Scoping
Express Design Evaluation
18
Express Design Evaluation deliverables:Summary – 1-page summary with information for
decision-making and record of findingsConceptual design(s) on environmental features
mappingCost estimatesConceptual maintenance of traffic narrativeInitial mapping limit CADD fileCommunication log and preliminary
stakeholder coordination documentation
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
Express Design Evaluation | Project Scoping
19
Project Scoping Site(NCDOT Connect Scoping Team Site)
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
20
SPOT Evaluation
Ideally an Express Design Evaluation has been completed
The project may now be entered into the SPOT process for prioritization and possible inclusion in the STIP
If the project scores well, and is funded into the STIP, the project will move into Project Scoping
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
21
Project Scoping
Project Scoping• Stakeholder Coordination
• Environmental Screening
• Technical Report Project Scoping Report
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
22
Environmental Screening
Project Scoping Screening ChecklistComplete the Screening
Checklist using best available data
Express Design Evaluation | Project Scoping
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
23
Technical ReportTechnical Report Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION IV. DESIGN OPTION IMPACTS AND COSTS
General Description Impacts
Background Costs
II. PRELIMINARY PURPOSE & NEED V. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Previous Studies Land Use
Adjacent Projects Community Resources
Crash Analysis Cultural Resources
III. EXPRESS DESIGN EVALUATION Natural Environment
Design Options VI. RECOMMENDATIONS
Other Options Considered VII. REFERENCES
Traffic Volumes FIGURES
Maintenance of Traffic
Express Design Evaluation | Project Scoping
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
24
Project Scoping Summary
Project Scoping SummaryOne-page summary
including general project information
Recommended document type
Express Design Evaluation | Project Scoping
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
25
Project Scoping Report
Compile the Project Scoping Report: Project Scoping Summary Project Scoping Technical Report Project Scoping Screening Checklist Stakeholder comments and coordination documentation Express Design Evaluation Submittal
Coordinate with ATLAS (Advancing Transportation through Linkages, Automation, and Screening) and TIP staff
Express Design Evaluation | Project Scoping
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
26
Next Steps
Determine if other requests should be submittedTraffic forecast and/or analysisPreliminary hydraulicsOthers as needed
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
27
Derrick Lewis, PE
Manager, Feasibility Studies Unit
Last Updated 7/30/2019
Feasibility Studies and Other Products
NCDOT – Integrated Project Delivery
Derrick Weaver, P.E. – NCDOT, Environmental Policy Unit IPD Planning & Environmental Coordinator
November 14, 2019
Outline• IPD Vision & What IPD is• Why Change is Needed• Impacts• Project Delivery Network• Available Tools• Training• How to stay connected
2
Integrated Project Delivery
IPD Vision
3
Integrated Project Delivery
What is IPD?
4
Integrated Project Delivery
Streamlined, more efficient
process
Team-based culture, incorporating technical
units
What is IPD?
5
Integrated Project Delivery
Transition to Matrix Organization
Project Manager
Technical Manager
Project Manager
Project Manager
TechnicalManager
TechnicalManager
Team member from a Technical Unit assigned to a project
6
Integrated Project Delivery
Industry Changes
Technology Advancement
Retirements/Succession Planning
Meet Customer
Needs
Why Change is Needed
Develop a Consistent and Transparent Approach
7
Integrated Project Delivery
Process Changes
Communicate & Collaborate
Frequently
Right-size process
based on project needs
Scope, Schedule, &
Budget Accountability
Project Managers
Lead Project Teams
What are IPD Teams Working On?
8
Integrated Project Delivery
Planning.
Plan with NEPA in Mind
Environmental .
Right-size Process to Projects
Design.
Develop Roadmap for Project Development
Construction .
Bridging the Gap between Design and Construction
Project Delivery Network
What is a Project Delivery Network (PDN)?
9
Integrated Project Delivery
Project Delivery Network
Network Diagram
Guidance Document
Value of the PDN
• Defines the process, roles and responsibilities in each milestone
• Fosters teamwork
• Creates consistency
• Customizable/Scalable
• Integrated approach to efficiently & effectively delivery quality projects
10
Integrated Project Delivery
Key Components of PDN
11
Integrated Project Delivery
• Consolidating review milestones• Not time based• Not percentage of plan complete• Activities within a phase can be done
simultaneously when possible (No handoff)• Major milestone are at the end of each phase
before project team should continue
12
Integrated Project Delivery
PDN - Levels
13
Integrated Project Delivery
Level 1 – Project Milestones
Level 2 – Support Activities
Level 3 – Details of Support Activities
Network Diagram
PDN Guidance Documentation
Displayed in…
PS&E
.4
Plan-in-Hand
3
Alignment Defined
2
Project Initiation
1
PDN Stages
14
Integrated Project Delivery
Finalize all plans,
specifications, and estimates
(PS&E).
Complete all design.
Establish horizontal &
vertical roadway
alignment and complete
Environmental Document.
Define and Document the Scope, Schedule, Budget to
commence NEPA and
design.
15
Integrated Project Delivery
16
Integrated Project Delivery
Project Initiation ImprovementsPlanning Team
Planning with NEPA in Mind
17
Integrated Project Delivery
Right-size Process to Projects
Enviro. Document ImprovementsEnvironmental Team
18
Integrated Project Delivery
Alignment Defined ImprovementsDesign Team
Develop Roadmap for Project Development
19
Integrated Project Delivery
Plan-In-Hand ImprovementsDesign Team
Develop Roadmap for Project Development
20
Integrated Project Delivery
Plans, Specifications &EstimatesDesign & Construction Teams
Bridge the Gap between Design & Construction
21
Identified Needs Form & Guidance
Integrated Project Delivery
Planning Tools Available Now
u Connect NCDOT u Projects u Planning u P6.0
22
Project Scoping Report Update• More ATLAS based• Streamlined• Construction Delivery Decision Matrix
Integrated Project Delivery
Planning Tools Available Now
u Connect NCDOT u Team Sites u Scoping u ATLAS Work Bench
23
Subject Matter Expert Contact List
Integrated Project Delivery
Planning Tools Available Now
• Excel File• In-house technical experts contact info.
u Connect NCDOT u Projects u Project Management u Contacts
24
Project Initiation
Integrated Project Delivery
Project Initiation Guidance
Environmental Tools Available Now
u Connect NCDOT u Projects u Project Management u Guidance Documents
25
MS Project Schedule
Integrated Project Delivery
Environmental Tools Available Now
u Connect NCDOT u Projects u Project Management u Resources
26
Updated CE Agreement
Integrated Project Delivery
Environmental Tools Available Now
u Connect NCDOT u Resources u Environmental u Project Development &
Environmental Policy u PDEA Procedures Manual u Document Prep/Distribution
27
Integrated Project Delivery
Design & CON Tools Available Now
Post Design Construction Services
u Connect NCDOT u Projects u Project Management u IPD u Resources
28
Integrated Project Delivery
Design & CON Tools Available NowContract Type Decision Tool
4 different delivery methods (DBB, DB, CMGC, PDB)
29
Current (1st round complete:• Roles & Responsibilities • Project Management• Microsoft Project Schedule• NEPA/SEPA• ATLAS
Integrated Project Delivery
Training
Upcoming:• Project Management
Bootcamp• Project Development
Network
Educate and Train PM’s and Technical Experts
30
Integrated Project Delivery
Communication will be key
Communication Impacts:• How well we serve our customers• Success in delivering what we promised
Communication
31
Next Steps
Integrated Project Delivery
Complete Level 1 & 2 of PDN
Start Level 3 of PDN
Develop Implementation Plan
Maintain Living Documents
32
Resources
Integrated Project Delivery
Project Management Connect Site
33
Stay Connected
Integrated Project Delivery
Subscribe to the IPD Newsletter!
Go to IPD Connect Site…
34
Integrated Project Delivery
Derrick Weaver, P.E. IPD Environmental & Planning Lead
Questions
Project ATLAS: Improving Program Delivery at NCDOT
10/29/2019 (2019 ASHE fall technical seminar version – 11/14/2019)
2
Advancing
Transportation through
Linkages
Automation and
Screening
ATLAS
Project ATLAS: Improving Program Delivery at NCDOT
Project ATLAS is an effort to increase efficiency of Transportation Program Delivery.
What is Project ATLAS?
Project ATLAS: Improving Program Delivery at NCDOT
3
1 2
Improving the Project Delivery Process
3 4 5 6 7
ATLAS DATA
ATLAS APPS
EXPRESS DESIGN
PLANNING PRIORITIZATION
&
PROGRAMMING
PROJECT
DEVELOPMENT
DESIGN PROPERTY
ACQUISITION
CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE
Project ATLAS: Improving Program Delivery at NCDOT
ATLAS Data & Business Workflows
GIS
WE
TL
AN
DS
& S
TR
EA
MS
PR
OT
EC
TE
D
SP
EC
IES
HIS
TO
RIC
RE
SO
UR
CE
S
TR
AF
FIC
CO
MM
UN
ITY
ST
UD
IES
BIK
ES
&
PE
DE
ST
RIA
NS
RIG
HT
OF
WA
Y
UT
ILIT
IES
5
Project ATLAS: Improving Program Delivery at NCDOT
ATLAS Applications
WORKBENCH
Manage and upload project data and deliverables, track project progress, and report on activities
SCREENING TOOL
Screen projects for effects and create screening reports
Your Project
SEARCH TOOL
Search or download data related to project development
APP
MANAGEMENT
TOOL
Configuration tools
in the hands of DOT
Business
6
Project ATLAS: Improving Program Delivery at NCDOT
Data Available in ATLAS
• Data comes from various sources*–All vetted web services–Internal to NCDOT
• ATLAS ArcGIS Servers• NCDOT Public ArcGIS Servers• NCDOT ArcGIS Online
–External to NCDOT (USGS, FWS,Corps of Eng.etc)
• Public facing ArcGIS Servers• Public facing ArcGIS Online
*https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiNTkxNDkxYWMtYjYwOS00NzcxLTkzYTUtZTA1N2FmM2ViNzE0IiwidCI6IjdlYzUwZTE2LTM3ODctNDY5Ny1iMDg2LTc5NWRkNTRiOGM5YSIsImMiOjF9
7
Project ATLAS: Improving Program Delivery at NCDOT
New Data Available in ATLAS
• Community Studies• Historic Architecture and Archaeology• Hydrography• Conservation Areas• Threatened and Endangered Species• Utilities• Water Quality
8
Project ATLAS: Improving Program Delivery at NCDOT
Hydrography
• ATLAS Hydrography*–Stream Centerlines–Open Water–Artificial Paths–Data Sources**
• Hydrographic break lines generated derived from the Quality Level (QL) 1/QL2 Light Distance and Ranging (LiDAR) data collected by the NC Department of Emergency Management (NC EM)
• NC Floodplain Mapping Program (NCFMP) data
• Headwater Streams Spatial Dataset (HSSD) linework. *http://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=24bca5cc6a144af495b0f282cd57d4ed (requires sign-on)
**https://xfer.services.ncdot.gov/gisdot/AtlasMetadata/
9
Project ATLAS: Improving Program Delivery at NCDOT
Natural Environment
• Areas of Environmental Concern–An AEC* is an area of natural importance: It may be
easily destroyed by erosion or flooding; or it may have environmental, social, economic or aesthetic values that make it valuable to our state.
–Areas of Environmental Concern (AECs) are the foundation of the Coastal Resources Commission's permitting program for coastal development.
*AEC: http://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=6fb77f3074aa48f7be7e3a9445e91f6a (requires sign-on)
10
Project ATLAS: Improving Program Delivery at NCDOT
Threatened and Endangered
• T&E* data from a variety of sources–Natural Heritage Program–NC PAWS–NC Mines–Northern Long Eared Bat–Red Cockaded Woodpecker
*T&E: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=128d25b640324f9f8af635fd6db436c8 (requires sign-on)
11
Project ATLAS: Improving Program Delivery at NCDOT
Human Environment
• Various depicting the Human Environment• NC Adult Education and Training Facilities• NC Childcare Facilities• NC K-12 schools• NC Medical Facilities• NC Places of Worship• NC Cemeteries*• NC Power Cooperatives*http://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=e063b714f82e458dbbf60ebf2a8e66a6 (requires sign-on)
12
Project ATLAS: Improving Program Delivery at NCDOT
Bike-Ped
• PBIN Update–Layers that will support the Complete Streets Program–Mostly Urban Areas
• Sidewalks
• Bike Lanes
• Bicycle Pedestrian Risk Score
–Update to Community Studies Layers
13
Project ATLAS: Improving Program Delivery at NCDOT
ATLAS: By the Numbers
June 2019ATLAS Go-Live Date
14Divisions Represented at Training
ATLAS Regional Trainings31
ATLAS Training Attendees500+
ATLAS Live Webinars4
1-STOP SHOP for Project Development
GIS Data Layers Available through ATLAS600+
Brand-New GIS Layers Created by ATLAS Team130+
Interviews with DOT Staff and Consultants as Part of Business Analysis Phase
100+
Screenings Reports Run Since Go-Live900+
400+Data Downloads Run Since Go-Live
14
Project ATLAS: Improving Program Delivery at NCDOT
I've wasted so much of my time in the past searching for files; this
will save time!
It was far better than I expected. The search, screening, and workbench tools are an absolutegame changer!
Exceeded expectations
Great tool! Thank you for listening to suggested updates/improvements for 2.0.
The software is user friendly.
I think Atlas is a great idea and
long overdue.Thank you for your efforts, communication between agencies is key! Please share with SCDOT too!
I was blown away by the organization and fully covered process.
This is one-stop shopping for preconstruction and streamlineswhat I need to prepare before going in the field.
ATLAS Feedback
I was nervous because I am not tech savvy, but thiswas very simple.
As a consultant PM, this system will be greatto track progress and to provide screening.
Atlas will be a highly effective method of delivering projects more efficiently.
Fantastic tool,
can't wait to use.
I see myself using this daily.
Great interactive, useful tool!
Overall Training Rating = 4.7/5
ROI
A Platform to Guide the Process
Easier Project Transitions
Maximize Historical Knowledge
Better Systems Integration and Handoffs
Project ATLAS: Improving Program Delivery at NCDOT
15
Progress Toward Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)
ROI
Workflow Management
Authoritative Data
Central Repository
Regional View
16
Project ATLAS: Improving Program Delivery at NCDOT
• NCDOT ATLAS Policy• IPD Collaboration• Actively working on enhanced functionality–Release 1.6 will be released tomorrow!
• Machine Learning Efforts• Scope for ATLAS 2.0
–Further collaboration throughout the program delivery process
Ongoing Work
ATLAS Team
17
Questions
And
Discussion
ATLAS
Project ATLAS: Improving Program Delivery at NCDOT
2D Modeling and VisualizationCrystal Moore
10/29/2019 (2019 ASHE fall technical seminar version – 11/14/2019)
Overview2D Modeling Overview
• Comparison between 1D and 2D• Software (Hec-Ras 5.0.6 vs. SRH-2D)• Background Data/Components• Challenges• Resources
2
1D Modeling overview 2D Modeling Overview
3
1D Modeling 2D Modeling Overview
4
What is 2D Modeling• Model that can show multiple direction of flow (complex
flow patterns)• Velocity is assumed constant through the depth but
varies in the horizontal directionTwo main programs:– HEC-RAS 5.0.6– SRH-2D
2D Modeling Overview
5
SRH 2D (SMS) vs. HEC-RAS2D Modeling Overview
6
SRH-2D2D Modeling Overview
• Major capabilities of the SRH-2D flow solve include:• 2D depth-averaged dynamic wave equations (the standard St. Venant equations) are solved with the finite-
volume numerical method;• Steady state (with constant discharge) or unsteady flows (with flow hydrograph) may be simulated;• An implicit scheme is used for time integration to achieve solution robustness and efficiency;• An unstructured polyhedron mesh is used, which includes the structured quadrilateral mesh, the purely triangular
mesh, or a combination of the two. Cartesian or raster mesh may also be used. In most applications, a combination of quadrilateral and triangular meshes is the best in terms of efficiency and accuracy;
• All flow regimes, i.e., subcritical, transcritical, and supercritical flows, may be simulated simultaneously without the need for special user intervention;
• Modules to simulate on-stream structures such as weir, gate, culvert, bridge, obstruction, internal boundary, and 2D pressurized zones;
• Robust and seamless wetting-drying algorithm; and• Solved variables include water surface elevation, water depth, and depth averaged velocity. Output variables
include the above, plus Froude number and bed shear stress.
7
Limitations2D Modeling Overview
• Overtopping bridges• Bank erosion and channel migration• Sediment transport• SMS
8
HEC-RAS 5.0.62D Modeling Overview
• Perform 1D, 2D, and combined 1D and 2D modeling• Saint Venant or Diffusion Wave Equation in 2D• Implicit Finite Volume Algorithm• 1d and 2D Coupled Solution• Unstructure or structured meshes• Detailed Hydraulic Table for 2D
9
Limitations2D Modeling Overview
• Internal hydraulic structures inside of a 2D flow area• Sediment/transport • Water Quality Modeling• Cannot connect pump stations• Bridge Modeling capabilities
10
Components2D Modeling Overview
Main Components• Background Data• Parameters/Components• Mesh – Terrain Model ExtentsSimulation Components• Monitor Points• Linking the Scenarios
11
Background Data2D Modeling Overview
• Terrain https://sdd.nc.gov/DataDownload.aspx
12
Background Data2D Modeling Overview
• Imagery - https://www.nconemap.gov/
• Defining Project Area
13
Applications• Scour Evaluation• Habitat/Wetland• Bank Levee• Bridge Hydraulics
– Not Overtopped bridges
2D Modeling Overview
14
General Challenges• FEMA compliance• Run time• Data storage• Overtopping bridges
2D Modeling Overview
15
Resources
• Wiki Page FHWA -https://www.xmswiki.com/wiki/SMS:SRH-2D
• https://www.aquaveo.com/downloads/• https://www.aquaveo.com/software/sms-learning-
tutorials• Youtube
2D Modeling Overview
16
Questions?
2D Modeling Overview
17