amazon case analysis - … … · web vieweven though it is a low margin business we are uniquely...
TRANSCRIPT
September 08
Executive Summary
The following are my recommendations to the board of directors of Amazon in my capacity as
the SVP of Strategy
1) Free shipping – Continue with supersaver shipping program and Amazon Prime. This
does not have a simulative effect on revenue but is a competitive necessity. The program
should be used to understand consumer behavior in terms of order quantity and frequency
of orders so that the shipping package can be fine-tuned based on the customer rather
than on dollar value of order
2) Online Grocery Business – Modify strategy to establish partnerships with traditional
grocery stores that do not have an online presence to expand reach and utilize existing
technology platform. Even though it is a low margin business we are uniquely positioned
to leverage our current customer base who value convenience through our order
fulfillment process. This would help us secure larger “share of the wallet” of a customer’s
online purchases.
3) Support to third party sellers – Continue supporting third-party sellers but charge them
a fixed fee per month for providing them the technology platform and commission based
on sales transactions completed through our platform. We can aggregate small business
owners and generate revenue by providing a cost-effective way for advertisers to target
them. These third-party sellers are also consumer customers in one way and helping them
grow their business would help us increase customer life time value through increased
customer loyalty.
Page 2 of 14
Free shipping policy
Amazon is a pioneer in e-commerce retailing and introduced the free shipping policy for orders
above a minimum threshold purchased on its website. This program has enabled it to attract
customers. But it has also placed an enormous burden on Amazon’s financials because of the
huge costs involved in shipping the products. The purpose of this memo is to determine whether
the program has had a (a) simulative effect on revenue and (b) is a competitive necessity. The
conclusions drawn would help determine the future course of action.
(a) Simulative effect on revenue
The effect of free shipping on simulating revenue has to be analyzed on 2 factors
(1) Inducing existing customers to purchase more & (2) enticing new customers to buy
through Amazon because of its free shipping policy.
We have been adjusting our free shipping thresholds over the past few years. Research
indicates that this strategy has not resulted in a simulative effect on revenue. Initially,
Amazon offered consumers free shipping if they spent $99, and then lowered the bar twice
during 2002-first to $49, then to $25. Data from comScore, a firm that tracks Internet
browsing and purchasing behavior for academic research, documented the impact of the
changes. When a $49 purchase triggered free shipping, the average purchase quantity of
products per order was 3.31. When the threshold fell to $25, the average purchase quantity
dropped to 2.53. The comScore data included 45 purchasers who bought from Amazon.com
when both thresholds were in place. Those consumers spent $17 less per "free shipping"
order under the lower threshold, and purchased 1.82 fewer items (1)
This data proves that lowering the free shipping threshold has not had a simulative effect on
revenue.
(b) Competitive Necessity
To determine if free shipping is a competitive necessity 2 points needs to be considered
(1) what are our competitors doing? & (2) How much do we lose on free shipping?
Page 3 of 14
(1) Competitor actions
Wal-Mart offers free shipping to its stores. This drives foot traffic to its stores and helps
increase same-store sales.
“Gap Inc., for instance, has for roughly two years charged customers who shopped at the
Web site of its Old Navy subsidiary $5 for shipping, regardless of the order size. Based
on the success of that approach, in August the company put into effect a similar strategy
for its BananaRepublic.com and Gap.com sites, with customers paying $6 for each
shipment”2
Analysis of the competitive landscape reveals that the market has accepted free shipping
as a ‘necessary evil’. All the above retailers offer free shipping or subsidize the shipping
charges for orders in one way or the other.
(2) Cost of Free shipping
The net cost to us of shipping activities was $128 million and $75 million for Q2 2008
and Q2 2007 (Exhibit 1 (a)), and $256 million and $162 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007 (Exhibit 1(b)). The net cost to us of shipping activities was $434
million, $317 million, and $239 million for 2007, 2006 and 2005. (Exhibit 1(c)). The
crucial element that needs to be noted is that our shipping costs as % of net sales have
remained relatively constant around 2.8% – 3%.
The above analysis seems to point out that competitive pressure to continue with the current free
shipping policy is huge. Since we pioneered this concept it would be very difficult for us to
rescind the free shipping policy and start charging the customers. This factor assumes added
importance at this point of time when we are going through a slowdown in consumer spending
because of the economic downturn. People are prone to becoming more cost-conscious during a
recession and adding a shipping cost would deter them from purchasing products through
Amazon.
Page 4 of 14
However, charging for order fulfillment can be an uncertain proposition. A January 2004 survey
by NetIQ Corp concurs: “shipping and handling costs trigger 52% of the abandonment of online
shopping carts.” (DMA 2004). Clearly, anecdotal evidence suggests that: (a) consumers are
highly responsive to shipping policies, (b) there is room for improvement in how policies are
crafted, and (c) little is known about consumer trade-offs that lead to the observed behaviors3.
We need to keep this in mind when adopting a shipping policy.
So my recommendation would be to extend the free shipping policy but modify the way in which
it is administered. We need to determine which customer segments (new customers or existing
customers) are more responsive to the policy and decide the free shipping threshold accordingly.
To illustrate my point let us consider what happens when we lower our free shipping thresholds
(1) more people hit the threshold through their orders which results in increased shipping costs
and (2) new customers are encouraged to buy because of the low shipping fee threshold on
orders. We need to determine whether it is more economical for us to ship in smaller or larger
quantities when determining the threshold. If we lower the threshold it results in more frequent
purchases by customers. But if the threshold is large then customers tend to order in bulk to save
on the shipping costs. Since offering low prices is fundamental to our future success we need to
re-evaluate our price each time we alter the threshold. In our case, we would be better served by
lowering our prices when we lower our threshold. This would induce customers to order multiple
quantities in a single order to meet the free shipping threshold. Comp store sales gain is up 13%
year-over-year in 2Q 2008. This can be attributed to the success of Amazon Prime ($79 per year
for free shipping) and its ability to shift consumer purchasing behavior from other e-commerce
retailers5.
A detailed analysis of the consumer behavior in terms of ‘Average number of products in an
order’ would help us offer the best shipping option for that particular customer to minimize our
costs and also provide value to the customer. Continuation of the Amazon Prime free shipping
program is crucial to collect the data needed to narrow down on consumer preferences and drive
the continued growth of our business.
Page 5 of 14
Online Grocery Business
Amazon entered the online grocery business in August 2007. It wanted to leverage its capability
in order fulfillment to keep expanding its revenue base. Although online grocers have existed for
a long time, shopping for groceries has not picked up as fast as expected among consumers. The
market for groceries in the US is estimated to be $500 Billion according to the Food Marketing
Institute. “Online grocery shopping still accounts for only 5% of all online retail sales, according
to Patti Freeman, a senior analyst at Jupiter Research. As a percentage, it’s even a smaller piece
of the total U.S. grocery bill. Last year, consumers spent $5.5 billion shopping for their groceries
online or less than 1% of U.S. grocery sales, Freeman said” 6 The penetration of e-grocers in
terms of the locations served is also less, which points out that there is a huge market potential
waiting to be tapped (Exhibit 2 (a)).
Sizing up the competition would help determine whether Amazon has a sustainable competitive
advantage and should continue with this business. The competition in the internet grocery market
falls into 5 segments 7
The pure-play full-line Internet grocers. (Grocery Gateway)
The limited-line category specialists. (Ethnicgrocer)
The system-providers. (Peachtree Network Inc)
The infrastructure builders. (E-Box, Homeport)
The traditional grocers. (Safeway, Tesco, Giant)
Amazon fits into the limited-line category specialist segment since we sell non-perishable items
and our focus is on highly populated areas like Bellevue and Kirkland in Washington State. But
we compete with the all the segments of the market for a pie of the internet grocery market. Our
top competitors and their offerings are as follows
(1) Peapod - Groceries for home delivery, plus office and cleaning supplies. Delivery limited to
metropolitan areas in USA's Midwest and Northeast regions. Includes coupons, shopping tips
and recipes. Its supermarket partners are Stop & Shop and Giant. (Exhibit 2 (b)).
(2) Netgrocer - USA nationwide delivery of non-perishable groceries, health and beauty
supplies, and home and gift items.
Page 6 of 14
Peapod is successful because of its tie-up with the traditional grocers like Stop & Shop and
Giant. It is able to deliver goods by the next day in most cases and provides features like Sort
by nutrition, new items, Express shop, Shopping lists, Aisle Browsing and Item Search. The
delivery charges are as low as $6.95 and peapod combines the value of diverse product
selection with the convenience of delivery. Because of its tie-up with supermarkets which
have higher purchasing power from grocery suppliers it is able to operate successfully.
Netgrocer on the other hand concentrates on non-perishable goods which do not impose a
burden of temperature controlled storage. Amazon has adopted the right strategy by
concentrating on Non-Perishable & high-margin items like health and beauty products.
E-grocers' scheduling requirements and the desire to consolidate purchasing activities to
a single trip are two factors affecting the consumers' desire to purchase groceries online.
Other factors negatively influencing consumers' decisions to purchase groceries or other
goods online include shipping costs, credit card security, the need or want for immediate
delivery of products, and the social aspects of the shopping experience 8. Amazon is well
positioned to overcome these factors because it has established credibility in the marketplace
through its secure payment gateway, supersaver shipping and the ability to set a delivery
schedule. Amazon has also kept the business model simple by shipping centrally, not selling
perishable goods and not providing overnight delivery. This in large part has removed the
challenges faced by traditional online grocers who have trouble with delivery and storage of
perishable products.
There is a strong reason to believe in the growth of the online grocery industry because of 2
factors (1) Increase in the number of dual-career couples who do not have the time needed to
purchase groceries from traditional stores and (2) Increase in the price of gasoline. These 2
factors fit well with our strategy of providing convenience and low prices to our consumers.
Our existing customer base is also very busy which is indicated by their preference for online
shopping rather than going to a traditional store for buying Books, Music or Movies.
The strategy to enter the online grocery business is a good one since it allows us to leverage
our existing strengths in order fulfillment. Customers can maintain their shopping lists online
which would give us more insights into the consumer behavior in terms of grocery shopping.
Page 7 of 14
This can be leveraged to cross-sell other products of Amazon. For example, if a customer
purchases a cooking book we can suggest that the recipe for the dishes in the book can be
ordered through Amazon. This would be a convenient way for a customer to get the required
items delivered to his doorstep.
Market selection is another important determinant of success of online grocery business. The
key driver for online purchase of groceries would be time/convenience rather than price.
Population density also needs to be taken into account to figure out whether the market can
be served profitably. The more the number of people who order from a particular location the
less the cost would be for the retailer to service the order. We have the taken the right steps in
terms of deciding to test the market in the Washington area. A plan to identify the target
markets based on the above mentioned characteristics needs to be developed. Based on the
plan a phased roll-out strategy needs to be worked out.
According to the Forrester Research report, multi-channel shoppers spend two to three times
as much as their single-channel counterparts. Further, 51% of online consumers in North
America researched a product online and then purchased it offline, while 22% of store
shoppers who had visited a retailer's website specifically looked for or purchased something
in store that they had previously seen on that retailer's website. By the same token, 25% of
online shoppers who had previously visited a retailer's stores purchased something that they
had seen in those stores at that retailer's website10. Currently we have 3 distribution centers
through which we serve the customers. Scaling up quickly depends on our ability to build
more distribution centers which would obviously put a strain on our cash flow. In such a
scenario, assuming the role of a system provider to the established grocery stores would be a
good option. This would be advantageous in the following ways
(1) Utilizing the multi-channel play which is favored among customers
(2) Expanding our product offerings
(3) Learning the nuances of grocery business distribution
(4) Ability to reach a wider audience without the need to put in huge amounts of money
upfront to establish distribution centers
Page 8 of 14
The online grocery business is of strategic importance to us especially in the current economic
climate because
(1) Of its ability to compensate for the reduction in the impulsive purchasing behavior of
customers
(2) Due to the downturn, customers would be cutting down on eating out and might prefer to
order pre-packaged food. Amazon by serving this population can generate significant profits.
The customer relationship established during this time can be leveraged to sell other
products.
So I strongly recommend that we continue the on-line grocery business.
Support of Third party sellers
An analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of providing support to third party sellers is
necessary to determine future course of action.
Advantages
Amazon makes a tidy sum as revenue from the commissions for the products sold
through its technology platform. We can earn additional revenue by leveraging the
existing infrastructure
By making competitors dependent on us, we are aware of their growth potential and can
take steps as necessary to sustain our competitive advantage
Our pricing algorithm can be fine-tuned by collecting data about the pricing of third party
sellers. This would enable us to gain knowledge about the market prices for products and
consumer behavior when they are presented with an option to purchase from Amazon or
from a third party seller
Aggregation of small business owners is highly lucrative. They could be the potential
target market for cross-selling our services. Amazon can monetize that market by
providing a way for advertisers to target the small business market through it.
Page 9 of 14
Disadvantages
If seller fails to deliver high-quality merchandise then Amazon’s reputation might be
damaged
We provide a path for our competitors to grow by using our technology platform
We cannibalize our sales by providing customers the option to buy either our product or
the product from the third party seller
Huge amount of money needs to be invested to maintain the technology platform to serve
the seller customers
On weighing the pros and the cons of providing support to third party sellers it seems to be
profitable to continue with the support because of following reasons
1) Customers always like choice when purchasing goods. That has been the driving factor
for our success since we have provided the customer the option of comparing different
products and choosing the one that best suits their needs. Value conscious customers
would anyway find a product at some other site at a lower price. By supporting third
party sellers on our site we are getting an opportunity to share the gains from the
transaction done by such a consumer
2) Allowing third party sellers would help us keep in touch with the market trends. Since
data is collected about every transaction, it can be used to determine the highest selling
items on the platform. Amazon is continually looking out for new opportunities to expand
our revenue base. This would be an ideal opportunity to learn about the market and the
“sweet spot” in terms of price before entering it. For example, if we allow a third party
seller selling jewels and find that there is a huge demand for that we can start selling
jewels to our customers directly.
The way to minimize our risks would be to charge a monthly fee for technology support and
commission for every sales transaction done through the platform. In addition, providing “fraud
protection” for the customers who purchase products from third party sellers through Amazon by
charging a small fee would be a good option. This would make sure that consumers would be
more confident in making purchases from third party sellers and we can also make sure that our
brand image is not affected by the actions of third party sellers.
Page 10 of 14
Exhibit 1 (a)
1 2
-9.0%
-7.0%
-5.0%
-3.0%
-1.0%
1.0%
3.0%
5.0%
7.0%
4.6%5.3%
-7.8% -7.9%
-3.2%-2.6%
3 Months Ended June 30, 2008 vs 2007
Shipping revenue Outbound shipping costsNet shipping cost
Year
% o
f Net
Sal
es
Exhibit 1 (b)
1 2
-9.0%
-7.0%
-5.0%
-3.0%
-1.0%
1.0%
3.0%
5.0%4.6% 5.1%
-7.7% -7.8%
-3.1% -2.7%
6 months ended June 30, 2008 vs 2007
Shipping revenue Outbound shipping costsNet shipping cost
Year
% o
f Net
Sal
es
Page 11 of 14
Exhibit 1 (c)
1 2 3
-10.0%-8.0%-6.0%-4.0%-2.0%0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%8.0%
5.0% 5.3% 6.0%
-7.9% -8.3% -8.8%
-3% -3% -3%
Year End - December 31st 2007 , 2006 & 2005
Shipping revenue Outbound shipping costsNet shipping cost
Year
% o
f Net
sale
s
Page 12 of 14
Exhibit 2 (a) – Locations served by e-grocers across U.S.A. (2005)9
Exhibit 2 (b)
Peapod products
Peapod features over 8,000 products in a range of categories: produce; meat and seafood; deli items;
prepared foods; natural and organic foods; Kosher foods; office and school supplies; seasonal items; and
video products; pet items; health and beauty aids; wine, beer and spirits (in specific markets) and
private labels from Peapod by Stop & Shop and Peapod by Giant
Amazon Products
Amazon.com features Grocery, Natural & Organic products, Gourmet Food, Health & Personal
care and Beauty.
Page 13 of 14
Bibliography
(1) http://news.cnet.com/The-psychology-of-free-online-shipping/2030-1069_3-6063440.html
(2) Nothing Says 'Buy' Like 'Free Shipping'
Bob Tedeschi. New York Times. (Late Edition (East Coast)). New York, N.Y.: Oct 8, 2007.
pg. C.8
(3) “Free shipping and repeat buying on the internet” – Theory and Evidence by Yinghui Yang,
Skander Essegaier and David R. Bell
(4) “The effect of shipping fees on customer acquisition, customer retention and purchase
quantities” – Michael Lewis Journal of Retailing 82 (1,2006) 13-23
(5) Behavioral Shift in Prime powers 2Q growth – Deutsche bank securities Inc July 24, 2008
(6) Amazon Gets Fresh Challenges With New Grocery Business –
http://www.cnbc.com/id/20463088/
(7) The Green Mile Digest 2001: Analyzing The Online Grocery Business - National Bank
Financial Jan 26, 2001
(8) Strategies and Challenges of Internet Grocery Retailing Logistics – Tom Hays, Pinar
Keskinocak and Virginia Malcome de Lopez
(9) Are E-Grocers Serving the Right Markets? by Casie Berning, Stan Ernst, and Neal H.
Hooker
(10) Channel surfing - Sally Praskey. Canadian Grocer. Toronto: Mar 2003 Vol. 117, Iss. 2; pg. 57
Page 14 of 14