amanda naylor vs children & young people lead. aims to examine: recent cases & on-going poor...

28
Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead

Upload: rodney-short

Post on 23-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead

Page 2: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

AIMS

To examine:• Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP

have in CJS• Policy initiatives/best practice examples (young witness

services, special measures, and other support systems)

• Specific role of the Intermediary and impact on CYP • How all professionals can play a key role in supporting

young witnesses both in preparation and post trial.

Page 3: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

WHO IS VICTIM SUPPORT?

Key agency that provides support at all ends of the Criminal Justice System

Services include:• Core victim and witness support services• IDVA and ISVA teams• Specialist children’s sexual exploitation

services• Specialist Young Witness Services

Page 4: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

WHY YOUNG PEOPLE NEED ADDITIONAL SUPPORT

“Young victims and witnesses are amongst some

of the most vulnerable users of the Criminal

Justice Service. If victim and witness care is to

be targeted at those with the greatest need this

will almost always include young people.”

Joint Inspection Report on the Experience of Young Victims and Witnesses in the Criminal Justice System, Feb 2012, HMCPSI, HMIC.

Page 5: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

WHO ELSE MAY BE INVOLVED WITH A WITNESS :

• Family• Police officer in Case• Social Worker• Witness Care Unit• Witness Service• Young Witness Service• Intermediary• Prosecution Barrister• IDVA/ ISVA• Specialist Organisation (Rape Crisis etc)• Health Professionals• Judge• Usher

Page 7: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

Victims and witnesses, particularly those who are young and vulnerable:

‘continue to be adversely affected by an absence of real focus on their needs… the CJS system itself appears to be unable to maintain a consistent and acceptable level of care as cases pass through it’

(HM CPS Inspectorate and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary, Joint inspection report on the experience of young victims and witnesses in the CJS).

7

SAFEGUARDING V JUSTICE?

Page 8: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

WHAT CHILDREN TELL US:

• Everyone was making decisions about what I needed – I didn’t know really what was going on. Everyone said what I needed no-one asked me what I wanted

• Being a witness re-traumatises and sometimes “feels worse than the abuse itself”

• I didn’t understand any of the questions – it was like he was speaking another language

• Everyone was happy that he was found guilty – I felt sad and lonely I just wanted it to stop.

• After the trial everyone just disappeared – job done and I had to cope with what everyone had said about me and knew about me.

Page 9: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

Research Findings: 50% of young people do not understand some of the

questions they are asked at court 65% experienced problems with comprehension or

complexity of questions More than 50% of these young people did not tell the

court of their difficulties More than 50% of young people report they were

accused of lying 66% of young witnesses who gave evidenced were

accompanied in the TV link room by a person they had not previously met

50% of young witnesses had a PTV, most did not have an opportunity to practice using the live link

Page 10: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

WHAT YOUNG WITNESSES

WANT….• to be taken seriously and told the truth• to be told things that might go wrong at court• to be able to trust the adult they spoke to • to know the limits of confidentiality agreement • to have a pre-trial visit before the day of court• to be listened to on a one-to-one basis• someone to answer questions and provide information• the adult/professional to be available to them• a non-judgemental and non-directive approach

Plotnikoff and Woolfson (2004) In their own words. NSPCC

Page 11: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

HOW CAN YOUNG WITNESSES BE BEST SUPPORTED?

• Aim to reduce Risk factors

• Increase Protective factors

• Increase Resilience levels

Risk factors

Protective factors

Resilience Levels

Page 12: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

UNDERSTANDINGSPECIAL MEASURES

http://www.youandco.org.uk/courtroom

Page 13: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

• VRI as evidence in chief• No watching of VRI at court• Registered intermediary • Pre-recorded cross-examination• No wigs and gowns• Judge and counsel to meet witness• Questions pre-submitted• Topic cards for questions• Face to face cross-examination• Afternoon hearing• Defendant not to see plasma screen

AGREED MEASURES

Page 14: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

“... as a result, a number of defendants have been prosecuted to conviction for committing very serious offences. The use of intermediaries has introduced fresh insights into the criminal justice process … They are independent and neutral. They are properly registered. Their responsibility is to the court. And they are used at much earlier stages in the process, to flag up potential difficulties in advance of the trial. … their use is a step which improved the administration of justice and it has done so without a diminution in the entitlement of the defendant to a fair trial. …. the use of intermediaries has meant that a number of those who are among the most vulnerable in the community may now be heard when before they would have been forced to remain silence.“

Rt Hon the Lord Judge, Lord Chief Justice 7.9.11

INTERMEDIARIES

Page 15: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

Vulnerable witnesses (both prosecution and defence) under s16 of the 1999 Act

Under 18 years of age; or where Quality of evidence may be affected by: mental

disorder or impairment of intelligence and social functioning or physical disability/disorder.

ENTITLEMENT TO A REGISTERED

INTERMEDIARY

Page 16: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

Special measures: Intermediaries should be considered in all cases of child sexual abuse, not just those involving very young witnesses, and if not involved earlier in the case, they should still be actively considered in advance of the trial as a means of supporting the victim giving evidence in court. Children and young people do not approach communication in the same way as adults and ability across all age ranges can vary considerably

Para 85 CPS Guidelines on Prosecuting Cases of Child Sexual Abuse, Oct 13.

CPS GUIDANCE

Page 17: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

• No RIs were used in the 69 interviews, including 4 interviews of children under the age of 6.

• RIs were not always sought because of “a tendency by some interviewers and their managers to over-estimate their own skill levels and/or underestimate the communication needs of vulnerable witnesses”.

• At court, RIs were not used as much as expected where the issue was simply age of the child.

• One court has made it clear they expect an RI assessment will be carried out on all children under twelve and that it should be mandatory for under nines.

JOINT INSPECTION REPORT DEC 2014

Page 18: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

• Recommendation 4: Police forces should ensure intermediaries are considered and used where appropriate; and the rationale and decision for their use or not are recorded

• Recommendation 5: The CPS should ensure intermediaries are considered for use at court in every case involving a child witness and a written record is maintained of the decision, particularly of the rationale where an intermediary is not used.

.

Achieving best evidence in child sexual abuse cases – a joint inspection, HMCPSI, HMIC,

December 2014

RECOMMENDATIONS

Page 19: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

FINDING OUT MORE?www.theadvocatesgateway.org

Page 20: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

What goes wrong for CYP

What is in place to ensure things improve

What can you do to better

support young witnesses

Page 21: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

WHEN THINGS GO WRONG

• No advanced referrals• No pre-trial therapy offered• No Ground rules hearings• No intermediaries• Poor timetabling (double/triple listings/ floating trials)• Special Measures not in place/ wrong special measures in

place• Unacceptable length of time in cross examination• Aggressive cross examination/ multiple cross examination• Media involvement• No post trial support• No co-ordination between agencies

Page 22: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

WHAT SHOULD IMPROVE THE EXPERIENCE FOR

YOUNG VICTIMS/ WITNESSES IN CJS?

Significant Progress across all agencies in working together to address gaps leading to:• Better understanding of the issues (OCC, SVACV)• Better identification of children and young people

being sexually exploited (ACPO, Working Together, MASH)

• More cases coming to court (CPS) • Wider range of Special Measures – better application• Training for key members of Judiciary, Prosecution

(Advocates Gateway, Equal Treatment Bench book)• Clear information on entitlements (Victims Code,

Witness Charter)

Page 23: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

TAILORING SUPPORT

• Talk to the young person about special measures available and help them make informed decisions - don’t assume

• Risk, protective and resilience factors may fluctuate during criminal proceedings – re-assess needs

• Ask person about condition, triggers, coping strategies and support needs

• Prepare and plan together for possible reactions

Page 24: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

Remember

It is important that you tell the truth at court

If you cannot remember - say you cannot remember

If you need to – say you want to hear a question again

If someone says something not true - say it is not true

EXAMPLES OF ‘GROUND RULES’

Page 25: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

WORKING WITH OTHER AGENCIES

Key Multi Agency Processes:

• Avoid duplication and ownership (my witness)• Professional Respect• Information Sharing• Skill Matching – right person provides the

support• Joint Planning• Advocacy • Little things matter

Page 26: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

LEGISLATION, STANDARDS & GUIDANCE – FURTHER READING

• Youth Justice & Criminal Evidence Act 1999Introduction of Special Measures

• Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings 2011 National Standards for Child Witness Preparation• Young Witness Handbook 1998/Young Witness Pack• Registered Intermediary Procedural Guidance Manual 2012• Victims Code/Witness Charter• Equal Treatment Benchbook 2013• Advocates Gateway• CPS ACPO Guidance 2013 (CSE)• Joint Inspection Report Achieving best Evidence in CSA

cases 2014• Criminal Practice Directions 2015

Page 27: Amanda Naylor VS Children & Young People Lead. AIMS To examine: Recent cases & on-going poor experiences that CYP have in CJS Policy initiatives/best

CREATIVITY TAKES COURAGE