amalgam for par test[1]
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
1/40
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
2/40
DENTAL AMALGAMDENTAL AMALGAM
Where is it?Where is it?
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
3/40
Elemental Mercury
Un-ionized mercury
High vapor pressure
significant to dentistry Absorption
readily from lungs
poorly from GI and skin < 0.1%
not toxic when swallowed
Clarkson Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 1987
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
4/40
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
5/40
Inorganic Mercury
Highly toxic as inorganic salts
Hg2+ mercuric ionmercuric oxide
swallowed batteries by childrenmercuric sulfide
red tattoos
Hg1+ mercurous ionmercurous chloride
laxatives
teething powderWands Am J Med 1974 Litovitz
Pediatrics 1992
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.zhippo.com/BlueHorseshoeHOSTED/images/gallery/red-flower-m.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.tattoonow.com/tattoos/Lorin_Hay/tattoos_8104.html&h=347&w=350&sz=13&tbnid=6wZflZDU5hsJ:&tbnh=115&tbnw=116&hl=en&start=22& -
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
6/40
Organic Mercury
Alkyl methyl - most toxic form
95% absorbed in gut
responsible for several masspoisonings
Minamata Bay, Japan - 1950 inorganic mercury dumped in bay
methylated by aquatic organisms
concentrates up food chain
ethyl preservative
Thimerosal anti-microbial in pharmaceuticals
Aryl highly toxic antifungal on seeds
Renzoni Environ Res 1998
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
7/40
Mercury Monitoring
Exhalation
difficult to perform reliably
Urinebest method for chronic
exposure
symptoms 300 g/L normal < 25 g/L
Goldfranks Toxicologic Emergencies 1990
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
8/40
Mercury Monitoring
Blood
normal < 6 g/L
reflects recent exposure
3-day half-life
reliable measurement of methylmercury
exposure Hair
not a reliable method
WHO Environmental Health Criteria
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
9/40
Dental Occupational Exposure
Higher mercury level found in providers
with poor mercury hygiene
screening of dentists 2% had elevated urinary
mercury levels
avg. 36 g/L
evidence of adverse preclinical effects Echeverria Neurotoxicol Teratol 1995
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
10/40
Comparison of Toxic Effects
Amalgam Composite Glass Ionomers
Systemic Toxicity
- acute
- chronic
None None None
Not verified Not verified Not verified
Allergic Reactions Rare Rare, but manycomponents haveallergic potential
Extremely rare
Anaphylaxis None so far Isolated cases None so far
Cytotoxicity Low Slight to high Slight to high
Mutagenicity or
Carcinogenicity
None Certain componentsmutagenic in vitro
Slight mutagenicity
Lichenoid reactions Yes Yes None
WHO 1997
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
11/40
AMALGAM TERMINOLOGYAMALGAM TERMINOLOGY
AMALGAMAMALGAM = an alloy containing Hg as the major ingredient.= an alloy containing Hg as the major ingredient.
DENTAL AMALGAM = an alloy of Hg with Ag-Sn.DENTAL AMALGAM = an alloy of Hg with Ag-Sn.
DENTAL AMALGAM ALLOY = a Ag-Sn alloy (to be mixed with Hg).DENTAL AMALGAM ALLOY = a Ag-Sn alloy (to be mixed with Hg).
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
12/40
ALLOY PRODUCTIONALLOY PRODUCTION
Melting / Casting / ComminutionMelting / Casting / Comminution IRREGULAR ParticlesIRREGULAR Particles
Melting / Spray AtomizationMelting / Spray Atomization SPHERICAL PARTICLESSPHERICAL PARTICLES
Cast ingots --> filed into powderCast ingots --> filed into powderIrregular particles = lathe cut = filingsIrregular particles = lathe cut = filings
Hot alloy sprayed into cold airHot alloy sprayed into cold airParticles spherodize and solidifyParticles spherodize and solidify
Polycrystalline particlesPolycrystalline particlesHomogenized by HT to remove coringHomogenized by HT to remove coring
Annealing HT to relieve cold work in filingsAnnealing HT to relieve cold work in filings
Spheres are acid-washedSpheres are acid-washedGenerally spheres are HTGenerally spheres are HT
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
13/40
Hg / Alloy RATIOSHg / Alloy RATIOS
50:5050:5042:5842:58
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
14/40
ALLOY MANIPULATIONALLOY MANIPULATION
Manual Trituration Procedures:Manual Trituration Procedures:
Alloy + HgAlloy + Hg mortar + pestlemortar + pestle manual mixingmanual mixing
Mechanical Trituration Procedures:Mechanical Trituration Procedures:
Powdered alloy + HgPowdered alloy + Hg capsule + pestlecapsule + pestle amalgamatoramalgamator
Pelleted alloy + HgPelleted alloy + Hg capsule + pestlecapsule + pestle amalgamatoramalgamator
Powdered alloy + HgPowdered alloy + Hg pre-capsulatedpre-capsulated amalgamatoramalgamator
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
15/40
Dispersion Hardening
A crack will dead end or terminate on a
sphere that is dispersed in the matrix,
preventing a fatal crack of the material
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
16/40
Propagation of a dental amalgam
crack
i di i h d i i
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
17/40
To incorporate dispersion hardening into
dental amalgams: Conventional amalgam mixed small spheres of the
eutectic of AgCu in the powder, the phase
The eutectic was used for the low melting point.
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
18/40
Final composition of the dispersion
strengthened amalgam (admixed alloy)
Ag 71 % 69.7 % Sn 26 % 17.7 %
Cu 2 % 12 %
Zn 1 % 0.9%
Sphere size ranged from 20-60m diameter
Before adding spheres After adding spheres
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
19/40
Dispersion Hardened Amalgam
Clinical experience showed that the
amalgam performed well and showed little
corrosion.
The amalgam contained no 2
phase
The spheres were disappearing from the
amalgam
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
20/40
Setting Reaction
Sn7Hg + Ag3Cu Sn5Cu6 + Ag3Hg
2 1
The 2 phase is converted to the and the 1phase
The Cu is the active metal in the conversion
This reaction is slow, taking months to go to completion
Cu could be added to the alloy The Cu must replace the Ag not the Sn
The addition of spheres for dispersion hardening doesnot produce the intended result
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
21/40
High Cu single composition alloys
The development of making spheres of
eutectics produced the technology of
making spheres of ternary alloys, producingall-spherical alloys
Most high copper alloys are spherical single
composition alloys Particle sizes are below 30 m for most of
these compositions
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
22/40
Single composition all-spherical alloys
The advantages of the all spherical particles is
that
Close dense packing can be achieved
Less Hg is required ( 40 - 45 % by wt )
The amalgam sets faster (more surface area
of the particles)
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
23/40
CLASSIFICATIONCLASSIFICATION
Copper content = low copper, high copperCopper content = low copper, high copper Particle size (and shape) = irregular, sphericalParticle size (and shape) = irregular, spherical Number of particle types = 1 or 2Number of particle types = 1 or 2 Zinc content = Zn-containing, Zn-freeZinc content = Zn-containing, Zn-free
Application of system of nomenclatureApplication of system of nomenclature
AlloyAlloy CopperCopper ParticleParticle Number ofNumber of ZincZincName:Name: Content:Content: Shape:Shape: Particles:Particles: Content:Content:
New True DentalloyNew True Dentalloy LowLow IrregularIrregular 1 Particle1 Particle NoNo
VelvalloyVelvalloy LowLow IrregularIrregular 1 Particle1 Particle NoNoDispersalloyDispersalloy HighHigh BothBoth 2 Particles2 Particles YesYesTytinTytin HighHigh SphericalSpherical 1 Particle1 Particle NoNo
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
24/40
Rx and MICROSTRUCTURERx and MICROSTRUCTURE
IrregularIrregularAlloyAlloy
SphericalSphericalAlloyAlloy
AgAg Primary reactantPrimary reactant
SnSn Creates solubility, fluidityCreates solubility, fluidity
CuCu Reacts with SnReacts with Sn
ZnZn Alloy processing aidAlloy processing aid
HgHg Reactant with Ag (and Sn)Reactant with Ag (and Sn)
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
25/40
SETTING REACTIONSSETTING REACTIONS
Low-Copper Dental Amalgam:Low-Copper Dental Amalgam:
2-Particle High-Copper Dental Amalgam:2-Particle High-Copper Dental Amalgam:
1-Particle High-Copper Dental Amalgam:1-Particle High-Copper Dental Amalgam:
S-AlloyS-Alloy + Hg+ Hg Residual AlloyResidual Alloy + Matrix-1+ Matrix-1 + Matrix-2+ Matrix-2AgAg33Sn/Cu+ HgSn/Cu+ Hg AgAg33Sn/CuSn/Cu + Ag+ Ag22HgHg33 + CuSn + Cu+ CuSn + Cu33SnSn
+ Hg+ Hg ++ 11 ++ ++
I-AlloyI-Alloy + Hg+ Hg Residual AlloyResidual Alloy + Matrix-1+ Matrix-1 + Matrix-2+ Matrix-2 + Hg+ Hg ( (AgAg33Sn)Sn) ++ 11 + (+ ( 22))
S-AlloyS-Alloy + Hg+ Hg Residual AlloyResidual Alloy + Matrix-1+ Matrix-1 + Matrix-2+ Matrix-2AlloyAlloy + Hg+ Hg Alloy (Ag-Cu)Alloy (Ag-Cu) ++ 11 ++ ++
I/S-AlloyI/S-Alloy + Hg+ Hg Residual AlloyResidual Alloy + Matrix-1+ Matrix-1 + Matrix-2+ Matrix-2Ag-SnAg-Sn + Hg+ Hg Ag-SnAg-Sn + Ag-Hg+ Ag-Hg + Sn-Hg+ Sn-HgAgAg33SnSn + Hg+ Hg AgAg33SnSn + Ag+ Ag22HgHg33 + Sn+ Sn7-87-8HgHg
+ Hg+ Hg ++ 11 ++ 22
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
26/40
Rx and MICROSTRUCTURERx and MICROSTRUCTURE
+ Hg+ Hg ++ ++
11 22
Penetrating CorrosionPenetrating Corrosion
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
27/40
+ Hg+ Hg ++ ++
11 + spheres+ spheres ++
Rx and MICROSTRUCTURERx and MICROSTRUCTURE
69 Ag69 Ag
18 Sn18 Sn
12 Cu12 Cu
1 Zn1 ZnDISPERSALLOYDISPERSALLOY
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
28/40
PHASE DIAGRAMSPHASE DIAGRAMS
AgAg HgHg
AgAg33Sn + Hg >>>Sn + Hg >>>
AgAg22HgHg33 == 11
(26Ag-74Hg)(26Ag-74Hg)
11 ++
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
29/40
Overview of ManipulationOverview of Manipulation
Selection / Proportioning / Amalgamation / Manipulation / PolishingSelection / Proportioning / Amalgamation / Manipulation / Polishing
Placement andPlacement and
CondensationCondensationCarvingCarving BurnishingBurnishing PolishingPolishing
Onset ofOnset of
MIXINGMIXINGOnset ofOnset of
WORKINGWORKINGOnset ofOnset of
SETTINGSETTINGEnd ofEnd of
SETTINGSETTING24 hours24 hours
TIMETIME
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
30/40
AmalgamatorsAmalgamators
SPEEDSPEED TIMETIME
ENERGY = Speed x TimeENERGY = Speed x Time
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
31/40
Unset amalgamUnset amalgam
AA
Setting amalgamSetting amalgam
BB
Ag-Hg crystalreaction products
Residual alloy
Excess Hg-rich matrixeliminated by condensation.
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
32/40
DIMENSIONAL CHANGESDIMENSIONAL CHANGES
Dimensional changes on setting:Dimensional changes on setting:
CONTRACTION during alloy dissolutionCONTRACTION during alloy dissolution
EXPANSION during impingement of reaction product crystalsEXPANSION during impingement of reaction product crystals
(EXPANSION if side reactions due to H(EXPANSION if side reactions due to H22O contamination)O contamination)
EXP (+)EXP (+)
CONT (--)CONT (--)
TIMETIME
Dimensional changes on depend on reaction variables:Dimensional changes on depend on reaction variables:
Particle size, Hg/alloy ratio, trituration time, condensation, ...Particle size, Hg/alloy ratio, trituration time, condensation, ...
ADA =ADA =
20 20 mm
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
33/40
AMALGAM PROPERTIESAMALGAM PROPERTIES
2.2. Clinical PerformanceClinical Performance
a.a. Longevity = 20-25 yrs ideally, 8-12 yrs practicallyLongevity = 20-25 yrs ideally, 8-12 yrs practicallyb.b. Modes of failure = caries, marginal fracture, bulkModes of failure = caries, marginal fracture, bulk
UNITED
STATES
WORLD
ADA FDI
ISOANSI
B.B. Properties:Properties:
1.1. PhysicalPhysical
2.2. MechanicalMechanical3.3. ChemicalChemical4.4. BiologicalBiological
A.A. Introduction:Introduction:
1.1. Specifications for Amalgam PropertiesSpecifications for Amalgam Propertiesa.a. ADA / ANSI and ISOADA / ANSI and ISOb.b. Determination of safety and efficacyDetermination of safety and efficacy
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
34/40
Physical PropertiesPhysical Properties
1.1. Thermal conductivity =Thermal conductivity =
2.2. Electrical conductivity =Electrical conductivity =
3.3. Coefficient of thermal expansion =Coefficient of thermal expansion =
4.4. Radiopacity =Radiopacity =
5.5. Color =Color =
[>2 mm Aluminum][>2 mm Aluminum]
[Lustrous, shiny, white][Lustrous, shiny, white]
25 ppm/25 ppm/CC[High][High]
[High][High]
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
35/40
Mechanical PropertiesMechanical Properties
Compressive Strength (psi)Compressive Strength (psi) Tensile Strength (psi)Tensile Strength (psi)
15-min15-min 1-hr1-hr 24-hr24-hr 15-min15-min 1-hr1-hr 24-hr24-hr
LOW COPPER:LOW COPPER:
VelvalloyVelvalloy 5,4005,400 17,40017,400 56,20056,200 625625 1,9001,900 9,0009,000
SpheralloySpheralloy 5,8005,800 18,50018,500 56,90056,900 450450 1,5501,550 8,8008,800
HIGH COPPER:HIGH COPPER:
Optalloy IIOptalloy II 9,1009,100 23,80023,800 55,90055,900 1,0001,000 2,3502,350 7,2507,250
DispersalloyDispersalloy 6,2006,200 22,40022,400 59,90059,900 575575 1,7501,750 6,9906,990
IndiloyIndiloy 4,6004,600 26,30026,300 64,50064,500 450450 2,4002,400 6,5006,500
SybraloySybraloy 23,80023,800 50,00050,000 72,70072,700 2,1902,190 4,7004,700 6,6006,600
TytinTytin 10,20010,200 40,80040,800 79,10079,100 990990 4,0004,000 9,3009,300
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
36/40
Mechanical PropertiesMechanical Properties
TYTIN (Kerr Dental Mfg) = tie up the tinTYTIN (Kerr Dental Mfg) = tie up the tin
High-Copper, Spherical, 1 Particle, Zn-freeHigh-Copper, Spherical, 1 Particle, Zn-free
42% Hg mixed with alloy42% Hg mixed with alloy
Fast-settingFast-setting
High early strengthHigh early strength
PolishedPolishedSurfaceSurface
FractureFracture
SurfaceSurface
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
37/40
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
38/40
Biological PropertiesBiological Properties
Mercury Toxicity:Mercury Toxicity:OSHA maximumOSHA maximum TLV = 50TLV = 50 g/mg/m33 (vapor) per 40 hr work week.(vapor) per 40 hr work week.Transient intraoral release (
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
39/40
Clinical PerformanceClinical Performance
Reasons for Failure:Reasons for Failure:Low-copper amalgam marginal fracture and secondary caries.Low-copper amalgam marginal fracture and secondary caries.High-copper amalgam marginal fracture and bulk fracture.High-copper amalgam marginal fracture and bulk fracture.
Jorgensen theory of mercuroscopic expansion (and marginal fracture)Jorgensen theory of mercuroscopic expansion (and marginal fracture)
Internal corrosionInternal corrosion
PenetratingPenetratingCorrosionCorrosion
Corrosion at marginsCorrosion at margins
SuperficialSuperficialCorrosionCorrosion
Sn-O-Cl and Sn-OSn-O-Cl and Sn-O
CorrosionCorrosionProductsProducts
-
8/4/2019 Amalgam for Par Test[1]
40/40
Clinical EvaluationClinical Evaluation
Mahler scale:Mahler scale:
Hi-Cu, no ZnHi-Cu, no Zn
Hi-Cu, +ZnHi-Cu, +Zn
Low-Cu, +ZnLow-Cu, +Zn
Low-Cu, no ZnLow-Cu, no Zn
Hi-CuHi-Cu
Low-CuLow-Cu