alternatives to privatization and assessing contracts october 5, 2004
TRANSCRIPT
Alternatives to Privatization and Assessing Contracts
October 5, 2004
Choosing Between Public and Private Provision
1. Natural Monopolies
2. Decreasing Costs
3. Externalities
4. Inability to Charge Users or to Exclude Nonpayers
5. Merit Goods
Public and Private Sectors as Buyers and Producers
Private Sector as Buyer
Private Sector as Producer
Government as Producer
Government as Buyer
Compulsory education
Law courts
Police and armed forces
Road construction
Schoolbooks
Professional services
Education
Housing
Taxi rides
Railway transport
Water supply
Housing
Alternatives to Privatization
Back to the GovernmentGovernment Vending Intergovernmental AgreementContracts Regulated Franchises
Alternatives to Privatization
GrantsVouchersFree MarketConsumer CooperativesSelf-Service
The Magic Bullet
Influences by:– Government– Business– Foundations– Individuals
How do NPOs/NGOs try to counter this? What is value-added by having NPOs/NGOs
as producers?
Public-Private Partnerships – More Examples
U.S. Government and Faith-Based and Community Initiatives
Conservation Coffee Alliance The Role of NGOs in Basic Education in Africa
Types of U.S. Federal Grants
Discretionary Grants – awarded by an agency of the Federal government
Formula or Block Grants – federal dollars given to states, cities or counties for them to distribute
Discussion from Readings
Privatization Grants/contracts with NPOs/NGOs Reinventing Government
Assessing Contracts
Logical Framework Logic Model Hierarchy of Results
Uses of Evaluation
Judge merit or worth– summative, accountability, audits,
accreditation/licensing Improve program
– formative, continuous improvement,
learning organization, quality improvement,
effective management Generate knowledge
– generalizations about effectiveness, policy making, scholarly publishing, synthesis of patterns across programs, extrapolation of principles, theory building
The Logical Framework
NARRATIVESUMMARY
INDICATORS MEANS OFVERIFICATION
ASSUMPTIONS
GOAL
PURPOSE
OUTPUTS
INPUTS
Horizontal Logic of the LogframeNARRATIVESUMMARY
INDICATORS MEANS OFVERIFICATION
ASSUMPTIONS
GOAL
PURPOSE
COMPONENTS
ACTIVITIES
Definitions
Logic model: a simple flow diagram of how a program is meant to work
Inputs: factors/resources used by programs to conduct activities and achieve objectives
Activities/processes: what a program does with its inputs
Outputs: products of activities Outcomes: impact of service on participant’s life Outcome indicators: information used to determine if
outcome is achieved
PLANNING
EVALUATION
Focus, Collect data, Analyze and interpret, Report
OUTPUTSACTIVITIES
What the program does
Products of what it does
INPUTS OUTCOMES
Programmatic investments or resources
Short, intermediate, longer term, impact
Logic Model
The Logic Model
Resources/Inputs Activities Outputs Outcomes Impact
Certain resources are needed to operate your program
If you have access to them, then you can use them to accomplish your planned activities
If you accomplish your planned activities, then you will hopefully deliver the amount of product and/or service that you intended
If you accomplish your planned activities to the extent you intended, then your participants will benefit in specific ways.
If these benefits to participants are achieved, then certain longer term changes in beneficiaries’ circumstances, organizations, communities, or systems might be expected to occur
Your planned Work Your Intended Results
This chart is adopted from “Logic Model Development Guide”, W.K. Kellogg Foundation, December 2001
Logic Model – Another View
Activities
Inputs
Outputs
Outcomes
Impacts
IF a project has these inputs THEN it can provide these activities.
IF a project provides these activities THEN it can produce these outputs.
IF a project produces these outputs THEN participants will have these changes in knowledge, attitudes or skills.
IF participants have these changes in knowledge, attitudes or skills THEN they will have these changes in being.
Additional References
Faith-Based Community Initiatives
www.fbci.gov Pennsylvania Utility Choice
www.utilitychoice.org Evolving Partnerships: The Role of NGOs in Basic Education in Africa
Academy for Education and Development (AED)
http://www.aed.org/ToolsandPublications/upload/EvolvingPartnerships.pdf United States Agency for International Development Teams with
Conservation International and Starbucks to Support Coffee Farmers
www.starbucks.com/aboutus/pressdesc.asp?id=443
Logic Model Readings forNext Week
W.K. Kellogg Foundation Logic Model Development Guide
www.wkkf.org/Pubs/Tools/Evaluation/Pub3669.pdf
pages 1-14
The Temporal Logic Model: A Concept Paper
Molly den Heyer, International Development and Research Centre of Canada. (July, 2001).
http://web.idrc.ca/uploads/user-S/10553603900tlmconceptpaper.pdf