alter – information systems 4th ed. © 2002 prentice hall 1 understanding systems from a business...
TRANSCRIPT
1 Alter – Information Systems 4th
ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall
Understanding Systems From a Business Viewpoint
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall2
Opening Case - Amazon How does Amazon.com provide value for
customers?
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall3
Opening Case - Amazon
At the beginning: Large discounts Focus on customer’s online shopping
experience: easy search, varied information about books, customer profiles, etc.
Very little inventory
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall4
An evolving business model: Large warehouses Branched into selling other types of products
Service perceived as very reliable Not profitable!
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall5
Amazon.com
The point of this case is not about technology essentially, rather it is about how information systems and information technology can transform business operations.
How does Amazon.com provide value for its customers?
What has “transformed” in this business? How has competitive advantage changed to
competitive necessity?
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall6
The Work System Framework A useful way of thinking about information systems
and their relationship to customers and participants from the perspective of a business professional.
A work system is a system that produces products for internal and external customers through a business process performed by human participants with the help of information technology.
An information system is a particular type of work system that uses information technology to capture transmit store, retrieve, manipulate, or display information, thereby supporting one or more other work systems.
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall7
The Work System Framework
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall8
Amazon.Com - WCA
CUSTOMER
Person who purchases books
Wholesalers that supply the books
Amazon.com’s shipping department
PRODUCT
Information about books that might be purchased
Information describing each book order
Books that are eventually delivered
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall9
Amazon.Com - WCABUSINESS PROCESS
Major Steps:
•Purchaser logs on to www.amazon.com
•Purchaser identifies desired book or gives search criteria
•Purchaser looks at book-related information and decides what to order
•Purchaser enters order
•Amazon.com orders book from wholesaler
•Wholesaler sends book to Amazon.com
•Shipping department packages order and sends it to the purchaser
Rationale:
Instead of forcing book buyers to go to typical bookstores, permit them to use
online access from home or from work.
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall10
Amazon.Com - WCA
PARTICIPANTS
People interested inpurchasing books
Order fulfillment department of wholesaler
Shipping department of Amazon.com
INFORMATION
Orders for books
Price and other information about each book
Purchase history andRelated information forEach customer
TECHNOLOGY
Personal computer used bypurchaser
Computers and networks usedby Amazon.com for order Processing
The Internet (Infrastructure)
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall11
Debate Topic:
Is there any reason to believe that purely on-line retailers such as Amazon.com have major long-term advantages over retailers such as Barnes and Noble that have both physical stores and e-commerce sites?
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall12
The Need for Frameworks and Models
Framework = a brief set of ideas & assumptions for thinking about a particular issue
Model = a useful representation of some aspect of reality Typically based on a frameworks Emphasize some features of reality, while
ignoring others
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall13
A Classification of Models
Iconic Models Analog Models Mathematical Models Mental Models
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall14
Iconic and Analog Models
Iconic (scale) models - the least abstract model, is a physical replica of a system, usually based on a different scale from the original. Iconic models can scale in two or three dimensions.
Analog Models - Does not look like the real system, but behaves like it. Usually two-dimensional charts or diagrams. Examples: organizational charts depict structure, authority, and responsibility relationships; maps where different colors represent water or mountains; stock market charts; blueprints of a machine; speedometer; thermometer
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall15
Mathematical Models
Mathematical (quantitative) models - the complexity of relationships sometimes can not be represented iconically or analogically, or such representations may be cumbersome or time consuming.A more abstract model is built with mathematics.
Note: recent advances in computer graphics use iconic and analog models to complement mathematical modeling.
Visual simulation combines the three types of models.
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall16
Mental Models
People often use a behavioral mental model. A mental model is an unworded description of how
people think about a situation. The model can use the beliefs, assumptions,
relationships, and flows of work as perceived by an individual.
Mental models are a conceptual, internal representation, used to generate descriptions of problem structure, and make future predications of future related variables.
Support for mental models are an important aspect of Executive Information Systems. We will discuss this in depth later.
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall17
Examples of Models
Alter – Information Systems 4th
ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall18
The Work System Framework
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall19
The Work System Framework
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall20
Elements of the Work System Framework: The internal or external customers of the business process The products or services generated by the work system. The steps in the business process. The participants in the business process. The information the business process uses or creates. The technology the business process uses. Context = organizational, competitive, technical, and
regulatory realm within which work system operates. Infrastructure = shared human or technical resourcs the
work system relies on (even those those resources may be managed outside the work system).
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall21
The system actually performing the work Business process Participants Information Technology
Outputs: Products & services used by the customers
External factors Infrastructure Context
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall22
The business process is at the core of the work system The same process can be performed with
drastically different results depending on Who does the work What information & technology is being used
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall23
Balance Between the Elements of a Work System
The work system elements must be in balance
A change in one element usually requires a change in other elements Well-intended changes may also have
negative impacts
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall24
Viewing Information Systems and Projects As Work Systems
Information systemInformation system = a work system devoted to capturing, transmitting, storing, retrieving, manipulating, and displaying information Software products (e.g. Oracle, Excel) are
NOT information systems ProjectProject = a work system that is designed
to produce a particular product and then go out of existence
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall25
Work System Principles
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall26
Work Systems Principles
Please the customers (customers, products & services)
Perform the work efficiently (business processes) Serve the participants Create Value from information Minimize effort consumed by technology Deploy infrastructure as a genuine resource Minimize unintended impacts and conflicts
(context)
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall27
Information System vs. Work Systems
Bar code scanners and computers identify the items sold and calculate the bill
Work system supported by the information system: Performing customer checkout
Aspects of the work system not included in the information system: Establishing personal contact with customers, putting the groceries in bags
University registration system permits students to sign up for specific class sections
Work system supported by the information system: Registering for classes
Aspects of the work system not included in the information system: Deciding which classes to take and which sections to sign up for in order to have a good weekly schedule
Word Processing system used for typing and revising chapters
Work system supported by the information system: Writing a book
Aspects of the work system not included in the information system: Deciding what to say in the book and how to say it
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall28
Information System vs. Work SystemsInteractive system top managers use to monitor their organization’s performance
Work system supported by the information system: Keeping track of organizational performance
Aspects of the work system not included in the information system: Talking to people to understand their views about what is happening
System that identifies people by scanning and analyzing voice prints
Work system supported by the information system: Preventing unauthorized access to restricted areas
Aspects of the work system not included in the information system: Human guards, cameras, and other security measures
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall29
Relationships Between Work Systems and Information Systems
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall30
Reality Check:
Identify some situations in which you have encountered information systems that support other work systems. Describe the areas of overlap and non-overlap between information systems and the work system.
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall31
Need for a Balanced View of a System – Figure 2.5
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall32
Need for a Balanced View of a System Focus on Business Results – Emphasize the
customer’s satisfaction with whatever is being produced along with concern for the efficiency of the business process.
Focus on People and Organization – Emphasize the work environment, job satisfaction, and whether the organization is operating smoothly.
Focus on technology and organization – Emphasize the processing of information in databases, transmission of information, and whether the technology is operating efficiently and effectively.
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall33
Each of the three viewpoints is essential, but an excessive emphasis on any of them may lead to problems
The importance of the ongoing collaboration between business and IT professionals.
IT professionals may tend to look at the third viewpoint. It is important that business professionals make sure the first two perspectives are not lost.
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall34
Caution: Excessive Emphasis On…
Business Results can lead to superficial analysis of organizational and technical capabilities and wishful thinking of the power of technology.
People and Organization can generate too much concern on how people are getting along and not enough on business results and whether technology and information are adequate.
Technology and Information can sometimes generate technology solutions to minor problems and have little impact on business results or internal operations.
Alter – Information Systems 4th
ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall35
The Principle-based Systems Analysis Method
One of the possible ways to analyze a work system
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall36
The General Idea of Systems Analysis – Figure 2.6
Can be applied to the system as a whole and to its subsystems
Iterative processIterative process Shortcoming: no guidelines as to what has to be done at
each step
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall37
Organizing the Analysis Around the Work System Principles
The principle-based systems analysis TM
(PBSA) A practical approachpractical approach for analyzing systems
at various levels of detail Combines the general system analysis
concepts with the work system framework Converts the four steps of system analysis
into three steps
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall38
Defining the Problem & the Work System
The scope of the work system is not fixed Tradeoff between a too broad or too narrow a
scope Work system snapshot – a tabular summary
of the main aspects of the work system
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall39
Identify constraints and priorities Constraints Constraints = limitations that render certain
options unfeasible Ex.: budgetary limits. Existing technology
standards, etc. PrioritiesPriorities = statements about the relative
importance of various goals A small number of high priority issues should
remain the primary focus
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall40
Explore the Situation & Search for Possible Improvements
Each principle is used in turn to focus on a different part of the work system
Problems that were not included in the original problem definition may be uncovered
Some potentially beneficial changes may negatively impact other parts of the system
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall41
Address the Problem While Supporting the Existing Priorities
The recommendation: “What Should you do?” Clearly stated decision criteria to resolve the
tradeoffs and uncertainties related to constraints, priorities, and implementation capabilities
Tradeoffs: conflicting needs of work systems, performance vs. price, technical purity vs. business requirements, etc.
Uncertainties: direction of future technology, what is best for the company, etc.
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall42
Complete recommendations may include: Recommended changes in work systems elements. Clarification of work system vs. information systems
changes. Explanation of how proposed improvements will
address important parts of the problem. Justification in terms of organizational priorities and
feasibility Identification of meaningful alternatives Timelines and required resources Tentative project plan and deliverables
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall43
Applying PBSA to Work Systems, Information Systems, and Projects – Figure 2.7
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall44
Limitations & Pitfalls of PBSA
Compromise between complexity and completeness
Works well when the business process consists of identifiable steps that produce a recognizable output
Does not work so well when applied to activities such as “management” or “communication”
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall45
The Work System Framework
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall46
Common Systems Analysis Pitfalls Related to Elements of the Work System Framework
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall47
Common Pitfalls – Work System Elements
Customer ignore customer and the fact that the customer should evaluate
the product. Treating managers as customers even though they don’t use the
product directly. Product
forget that the purpose is to produce a product or service for a customer.
Forget that the product of a work system is often not the product of the organization.
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall48
Common Pitfalls…
Business Process Define process so narrowly that improvement is of little
consequence. Define process to widely that it is too complex. Confuse business process measures(consistency and
productivity) with product measures (cost to the customer and quality perceived by customer).
Think of business process as theory and ignore its support by participants, information, and technology
Participants ignore incentives and other pressures focus on users rather than participants.
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall49
Common Pitfalls…
Information assume better information generates better results. Ignoring the importance of “soft” information not captured by
formal systems.
Technology Believing that the technology is the system. assume better technology generates better results. Focus on the technology without thinking about whether it
makes a difference in the work system.
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall50
Common Pitfalls…
Context Ignoring context issue such as organizational culture and
politics, organizational policies, the competitive environment, and government and industry standards and regulations.
Ignoring non-participant stakeholders.
Infrastructure Ignoring possible failures in technical infrastructure (what
happens when the Internet is down?) Ignoring the need for human infrastructure to keep the work
system in operation (Who does on-going training of new staff).
Alter – Information Systems 4th
ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall51
Measuring Work System Performance
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall52
System architecture = the system’s main components, how they are linked, and how they operate together
System performance = how well the system, its components, and its products operate
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall53
Typical Performance Variables•Customer satisfaction
•Cost•Quality•Responsiveness•Reliability•Conformance to standards and regulations
•Activity Rate•Output rate•Consistency•Productivity
•Cycle Time•Down time•Security
•Skills•Involvement•Commitment•Job satisfaction
•Quality•Accessibility•Presentation•Security
•Functional Capabilities•Ease of Use•Cost of Ownership•Compatibility•Maintainability
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall54
Some important issues to keep in mind: Separately evaluate the performance of
different elements, because improvements in one area may not be beneficial in others
More is not always betterMore is not always better For some performance variables (e.g., customer
satisfaction) more isis better For others, such as consistency, rapid delivery,
etc., more is often notis often not better
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall55
Efficiency vs. effectiveness EFFICIENCY involves doing things the right way
An internal view Focus on how well resources are being used to
produce the outputs Ex.: productivity, cycle time, etc.
EFFECTIVENESS involves doing the right things An external view Focus on improving customer satisfaction Ex.: cost, quality, responsiveness, etc.
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall56
Performance Variables
Performance variables can be described or measured at different levels of clarity.
Quality experts are adamant that careful performance measurement is essential for process improvement.
Note differences between vague description and measurements.
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall57
Comparing Vague Descriptions, Measurements, and Interpretations
ACCURACY OF INFORMATIONVague description: The information doesn’t seem very accurate.Measurement: 97.5% of the readings are correct within 5%.Interpretation:This is (or is not) accurate enough, given the way the information will be used.
SKILLS OF PARTICIPATIONVague description: The sales people are very experienced.Measurement: Every salesperson has 5 or more years of experience; 60% have more than 10 years.Interpretation:This system is (or is not) appropriate for such experienced people.
CYCLE TIME OF BUSINESS PROCESSVague description: This business process seems to take a long time.Measurement: The three major steps take an average of 1.3 days each, but the waiting time between the steps is around 5 days.Interpretation:This is (or is not) better than the average for this industry, but we can (or cannot) improve by eliminating some of the waiting time.
QUALITY OF THE WORK SYSTEM OUPUTVague description: We produce top quality frozen food, but our customer’s aren’t enthusiastic.Measurement:65% of our customers rate it average or good even though our factory defect rate is only.003%Interpretation: Our manufacturing process does (or doesn’t) seem O.K., but we do (or don’t) need to improve customer satisfaction.
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall58
Important Point Improvements in a work system can often be
found by looking at relationships between architecture and performance issues.
Customer satisfaction is largely determined by product performance (effectiveness).
Product performance is often determined by a combination of product architecture and the internal work system performance(efficiency).
Note: efficiency vs. effectiveness
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall59
From work system architecture to customer satisfaction
Alter – Information Systems 4th
ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall60
Clarifications Related to the Elements of a Work System
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall61
Internal vs. External Customers
External customers - individuals or representatives of other firms or government organizations The reason the firm exists
Internal customers – work for the firm & participate in other work system Also important for the firm as a whole
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall62
Multiple Customers With Different Concerns – Figure 2.8
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall63
Transforming Customers Into Participants
Self-service work systems Ex.: ATMs, Web sites, etc.
May be beneficial to both firm and customers Cost reductions Better feedback, etc.
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall64
Products & Services
Customers evaluate the product Several areas of of product performance,
such as: Cost Perceived quality Reliability, etc.
Separate consideration of each factor helps in devising new ways to improve customer satisfaction
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall65
Participants
The people that perform the work process Difference between work system
participants and IT users Focus on work-related aspects as opposed to
the information system itself
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall66
Data, Information, Knowledge – Figure 2.10 DataData – facts, images, or sounds that may or may not be
pertinent or useful for a particular task Information Information – data whose form or content are appropriate for a
particular use KnowledgeKnowledge – instincts, ideas, rules, and procedure that guide
actions and decisions
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall67
Hard and Soft Data
Hard dataHard data = clearly defined data generated by formal systems
Soft dataSoft data = intuitive or subjective information obtained by informal means Often essential for understanding what really
happened, or whether proposed actions might encounter resistance
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall68
Technology
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY = computer and communication hardware and software
IT has no impact unless it is used within a business process
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall69
Infrastructure
The shared human, informational, and technical resources on which a work system relies in order to operate These resources exist and are managed
outside the work system Ex.: a shared corporate database, a computer
network, a support & training organization The infrastructure should be operated
and managed like any other work system
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall70
Technology vs. Infrastructure
Guidelines: Infrastructure if:Infrastructure if:
It is shared between many work systems It is owned/managed by a centralized authority Details are generally hidden from users
Not included in the infrastructure if:Not included in the infrastructure if: Owned & controlled within the work system Its hands-on users need to understand the
technical details
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall71
Human Infrastructure
Often less noticed than the hardware & software components, but equally important
Responsibilities include: Managing the IT facilities Training Enforcing standards, etc.
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall72
Information Infrastructure
Codified information that is shared across the company
This type of high level of information sharing is still rare
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall73
Context
The organizational, competitive, technical, and regulatory environment within which the work system operates
Includes: External stakeholders Organizational policies, practices, and culture Business pressures, etc.
May create both incentives and obstacles
Alter – Information Systems 4th
ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall74
Another Way to Look at This – From Alter’s 3rd Edition -
Five Perspectives for Looking at a Work System
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall75
WCA framework for thinking about any system in business
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall76
Five Perspectives for Understanding a Work System
ARCHITECTURE•What are the components of the system that performs the work and who uses the work product?•How are the components linked?•How do the components operate together?
PERFORMANCE•How well do the components operate individually?•How well does the system operate? (How well is the work performed?)•How well should the system operate?
INFRASTRUCTURE•What technical and human infrastructure does the work rely on? •In what ways does infrastructure present opportunities or obstacles?
CONTEXT•What are the impacts of the organizational and technical context?•In what ways does the context present opportunities or obstacles?
RISKS•What foreseeable things can prevent the work from happening, can make the work inefficient, or can cause defects in the work product?•What are the likely responses to these problems?
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall77
Important Point Improvements in a work system are usually
related to the links between the architecture and the performance perspectives.
Customer satisfaction is largely determined by product performance.
Product performance is determined by a combination of product architecture and the internal work system performance.
Note: efficiency vs. effectiveness
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall78
From work system architecture to customer satisfaction
Alter – Information Systems 4th
ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall79
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall80
Detailed Discussion of the Five Perspectives: Architecture Performance Infrastructure Context Risks
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall81
Architecture, Perspective #1
Architecture is a summary of how a work system operates. It focuses on the components of the system and how those components are linked, and how they operate together to produce outputs.
It is not merely a technical issue; IT and business professional involved with a system need to understand how it operates.
It is impossible to build an information system without detailed documentation of information and technology components of the architecture.
We use successive decomposition for documenting and summarizing architecture.
Process operation and process characteristics
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall82
Architecture, Perspective #1
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall83
Architecture, Perspective #1CUSTOMER
Customer’s entire cycle of involvement with the product
Requirements
Acquisition
Use
Maintenance
Retirement
PRODUCT
Components
Information content
Physical Content
Service content
(more in Chapter 6)
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall84
Architecture, Perspective #1BUSINESS PROCESS
Process operation:
•Processes providing inputs
•Sequence and scheduling of major steps
•Processes receiving the outputs
Process characteristics:
•Degree of structure
•Range of involvement
•Level of integration
•Complexity
•Degree of reliance on machines
•Linkage of planning, execution, and control
•Attention to exceptions, errors, and malfunctions
More to be covered in Chapter 3….
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall85
Architecture, Perspective #1
PARTICIPANTS
Formal and informal organization:
Job responsibility
Organization chart
INFORMATION
Major data files in the database:
Data organization and access
TECHNOLOGY
Major components:
Hardware
Software
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall86
Performance, Perspective #2
Performance - How well the system operates. A complete analysis involves qualitative and quantitative
measurements. Consider some performance variables….
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall87
Performance, Perspective #2
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall88
Performance, Perspective #2
CUSTOMER
Customer Satisfaction
PRODUCT
Cost
Quality
Responsiveness
Reliability
Conformance to standards and regulations
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall89
Performance, Perspective #2
BUSINESS PROCESS
Rate of output
Consistency
Productivity
Cycle time
Flexibility
Security
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall90
Performance, Perspective #2
PARTICIPANTS
Skills
Involvement
Commitment
Job satisfaction
INFORMATION
Quality
Accessibility
Presentation
Prevention of unauthorized access
TECHNOLOGY
Functional capabilities
Ease of use
Compatibility
Maintainability
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall91
Comparing Vague Descriptions, Measurements, and Interpretations
ACCURACY OF INFORMATIONVague description: The information doesn’t seem very accurate.Measurement: 97.5% of the readings are correct within 5%.Interpretation:This is (or is not) accurate enough, given the way the information will be used.
SKILLS OF PARTICIPATIONVague description: The sales people are very experienced.Measurement: Every salesperson has 5 or more years of experience; 60% have more than 10 years.Interpretation:This system is (or is not) appropriate for such experienced people.
CYCLE TIME OF BUSINESS PROCESSVague description: This business process seems to take a long time.Measurement: The three major steps take an average of 1.3 days each, but the waiting time between the steps is around 5 days.Interpretation:This is (or is not) better than the average for this industry, but we can (or cannot) improve by eliminating some of the waiting time.
QUALITY OF THE WORK SYSTEM OUPUTVague description: We produce top quality frozen food, but our customer’s aren’t enthusiastic.Measurement:65% of our customers rate it average or good even though our factory defect rate is only.003%Interpretation: Our manufacturing process does (or doesn’t) seem O.K., but we do (or don’t) need to improve customer satisfaction.
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall92
Infrastructure, Perspective #3
Infrastructure: Essential Resources shared with other systems.
Infrastructure failures may partially be beyond the control of people who rely on it (e.g. power outages).
Evaluation is difficult because the same infrastructure may support some applications excessively and others insufficiently.
Critical mass, having enough users to attain desired benefits, may be a key infrastructure issue.
Distinguish between infrastructure and the supporting technology (laptops used in the sales process vs. used for company e-mail).
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall93
Infrastructure, Perspective #3
Technology can be infrastructure if it is outside the work system, shared between work systems, owned and managed by a central authority, or when details are largely hidden from users.
Business professionals are often surprised at the amount of effort and expense absorbed by human infrastructure.
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall94
Infrastructure, Perspective #3
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall95
Infrastructure, Perspective #3CUSTOMER
Technical and human infrastructure the customer must have to use the product
PRODUCT
Infrastructure related to information content
Infrastructure related to physical content
Infrastructure related to service content
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall96
Infrastructure, Perspective #3BUSINESS PROCESS
Infrastructure related to internal operation of the process
Infrastructure related to inputs from other processes
Infrastructure related to transferring the product to other processes
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall97
Infrastructure, Perspective #3
PARTICIPANTS
Shared
human infrastructure
INFORMATION
Shared
information infrastructure
TECHNOLOGY
Shared
technology infrastructure
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall98
Context, Perspective #4.
The organizational, competitive, and regulatory environment surrounding the system.
The environment around the system may create incentives and even urgency for change.
The personal, organizational, and economic parts of the context have direct impact through resource availability.
Even with enough monetary resources, context factors ranging from historical precedents and budget cycles to internal politics can be stumbling blocks.
Incentives Organizational Culture Stakeholders
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall99
Context, Perspective #4
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall100
Context, Perspective #4CUSTOMER
Issues in the customer’s environment that may affect satisfaction or use
Business and competitive climate
PRODUCT
Substitute products
Ways the customer might bypass this type of product altogether
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall101
Context, Perspective #4
BUSINESS PROCESS
Organizational culture
Concerns of stakeholders
Organizational policies and initiatives
Government regulations and industry standards
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall102
Context, Perspective #4
PARTICIPANTS
Incentives
Other responsibilities and job pressures
INFORMATION
Policies and practices regarding information sharing, privacy, etc.
TECHNOLOGY
Technology policies and practices
Technology that may become available soon
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall103
Risk, Perspective #5
Risks: Foreseeable Things that can go wrong in terms of: accidents and malfunctions computer crime project failure
(To be considered again in Chapter 13….)
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall104
Risk, Perspective #5
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall105
Risk, Perspective #5CUSTOMER
Customer dissatisfaction
Interference by other stakeholders
PRODUCT
Inadequate or unreliable products
Fraudulent products
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall106
Risk, Perspective #5BUSINESS PROCESS
Operator error
Sloppy procedures
Inadequate backup and recovery
Mismatch between process requirements and participant’s abilities
Unauthorized access to computers, programs, data
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall107
Risk, Perspective #5
PARTICIPANTS
Crime by insiders or outsiders
Inattention by participants
Failure to follow procedures
Inadequate training
INFORMATION
Data errors
Fraudulent data
Data theft
TECHNOLOGY
Equipment failure
Software bugs
Inadequate performance
Inability to build common sense into information systems
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall108
Work Systems Principles
Please the customers (customers, products & services)
Perform the work efficiently (business processes) Serve the participants Create Value from information Minimize effort consumed by technology Deploy infrastructure as a genuine resource Minimize unintended impacts and conflicts
(context)
Alter – Information Systems 4th ed. © 2002 Prentice Hall109