allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

20

Upload: singhranayahoocom

Post on 24-Nov-2014

128 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs
Page 2: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

2

Presenting…

Page 3: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

3

Cost Allocation

Cost Allocation means the allotment of proportions of cost to cost centers or cost units.

Cost centre has been defined as “a location, person or item of equipment for which costs may be ascertained and used for the purpose of cost control”. Whereas a cost unit is a “unit of quantity of product service or time in relation to which costs may be ascertained and or expressed”.

Cost allocation includes choosing the object of costing, accumulating the costs that relate to the object of costing and choosing the method to identify those costs. Usually, the allocation of costs would be done based on machine-hours, direct-labor hours etc

Cost Apportionment: Cost allocation is also referred to as Cost apportionment. Cost apportionment means the allotment of proportions of items of cost of cost centers or cost units.

Page 4: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

4

Example 1

A manufacturing company has to allocate the total manufacturing overheads of $30,000 to its’ Products A, B and C and uses the traditional method of allocating based on the direct-labor hours. The direct labor hours for Products A, B and C are 2000, 1000 and 3000 respectively.

Solution:

Total labor hours = 6000

Cost Allocation:

Overheads allocated for Product A = 30,000 x 2,000 / 6,000 = Rs. 10,000

Overheads allocated for Product B = 30,000 x 1,000 / 6,000 = Rs. 5,000

Overheads allocated for Product C = 30,000 x 3,000 / 6,000 = Rs. 15,000

Page 5: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

5

Cost Absorption

Cost absorption means allotment of overhead expenses to cost units.

Overhead absorption is usually achieved by the use of one or a combination of overhead recovery rates.

An example of cost absorption would be the application of factory overhead costs to processing departments using a pre-determined overhead rate.

Page 6: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

6

Example 2

A company follows a practice of allocating the factory overheads based on a pre-determined overhead rate of Rs. 12 per unit produced. The number of units produced during the period is 5000.

Solution:

Cost absorbed would be = 5000 units x Rs. 12 per unit = Rs. 60,000.

This amount would be finally compared with the actual overheads incurred during the end of the period and under-applied or over-applied overheads will be calculated and adjusted accordingly.

Pre-determined overhead rate is a rate based on the budgeted overhead and yearly / period budgeted activity either in direct labor hours, machine hours or number of units etc.

Pre-determined Over head rate = Budgeted Yearly Factory Overhead costs Budgeted yearly activity

Page 7: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

7

Cost Ascertainment

This technique of costing involves:

(i) Collection & classification of expenditure according to cost elements and

(ii) Allocation and apportionment of the expenditure to the cost centres or cost units, or both.

Element of cost

Materials Labour Expenses

Direct Indirect Direct Indirect Direct Indirect

Page 8: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

8

Cost Unit

The quantity upon which cost can be conveniently allocated is known as a unit of cost or cost unit.

The Chartered Institute of Management Accountant (CIMA), London defines a unit of cost as “a unit of quantity of product, service or time in relation to which costs may be ascertained or expressed.

Example: (i) Brick kilns per 1000 bricks made(ii) Textile Milss per yard or per lb. of cloth manufactured (iii) Electricity Companies per unit of electricity generated

Page 9: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

9

Cost Centre

Cost Centre refers to one of those convenient units into which the whole factory organization has been appropriately divided for costing purposes.

Each such unit consists of a department or a sub department or item of equipment or machinery or a person or a group of persons.

Example: In a laundry, activities such as collecting, sorting marking and washing of clothes are performed. Each activity may be considered as a separate cost centre and all costs relating to a particular cost centre may be found out separately.

Page 10: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

10

Profit Centre

The profit centre is that segment of the activity of a business with which both the revenues and expenses are identified and profit or loss made by that particular segment of activity is ascertained.

There are two main differences between a profit centre and a cost centre:

(i) A cost centre is created for accounting convenience for ascertaining and controlling costs. Whereas the profit centre is created because of decentralization of business operations.

(ii) A cost centre does not have target cost. However, a profit centre has a profit target and it enjoys authority to adopt such policies which are necessary for achieving its target.

Page 11: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

11

Absorption Costing

Apportionment

Page 12: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

12

Absorption Costing

Absorption Costing is a principle whereby fixed as well as variable costs are allotted to cost units and total overheads are absorbed according to activity level.

Conceptually, absorption costing is a simple and fundamental method of ascertaining the cost of a product or service. It is the oldest and widely used system of cost accounting in operation.

Absorption Costing is also termed as ‘cost plus’ costing where a fixed percentage is added to total cost, to cover profit.

Page 13: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

13

Absorption of overheads

Criteria for absorption of overheads:

To decide a rate for the absorption of overheads the most common criteria are:

• Percentage of direct material cost• Percentage of direct labour cost• Percentage of prime cost• Rate per unit produced• Rate per labour hour• Rate per machine hour

The circumstances of a particular situation must be considered befora a choice is made.

Page 14: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

14

Over and Under recovery

Over and Under recovery of overheads:

The overheads incurred in running a business are known with certainty, but the amount of overhead absorbed is based on prior estimates of the levels of production and therefore over or under recovery of overheads is likely to be incurred during the period.

The explanations behind the major causes of over and under recovery of overheads are price functions, a change in level of general economic activity, poor marketing and so on.

Page 15: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

15

Advantages

• Absorption costing conforms with the accrual concept by matching costs with revenue for a particular accounting period.

• Stock valuation complies with the accounting standards, and fixed production costs are absorbed into stocks.

• It avoids separation of costs into fixed and variable elements, which is not easily and accurately achieved.

• The analysis of under / over absorbed overheads reveals any inefficient utilization of production resources.

• The apportionment and allocation of fixed production overheads to cost centres (e.g., departments) makes managers more aware of the costs and services provided.

• Cost plus pricing under absorption costing ensures that all costs are covered.

Page 16: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

16

Limitations

• This method employs highly arbitrary way of apportionment of overheads which reduces the practical utility of cost data for control purposes.

• In this method all fixed costs are not charged against the revenue of the year in which they are incurred. It is an unsound practice.

• Assigning product cost with a reasonable share of fixed overhead obscures cost-volume-profit relationship

• Behavioural pattern of costs is not given importance

• In reporting enterprise results, the profit of a particular period will be affected by the amount of overheads absorbed into closing inventories or work-in-progress or finished stock or charged against the period when opening inventories are sold.

• In most cases accuracy in determining selling prices cannot be achieved due to the nature of overheads included in the calculations.

Page 17: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

17

Example 3

A company is manufacturing 3 products A, B and C. Their manufacturing cost is:

A B C

Direct Material per unit Rs. 3 Rs. 4 Rs. 5

Direct Labour 2 3 4

Selling Price 10 15 20

Output 1,000 units 1,000 units 1,000 units

The total overheads are Rs. 6,000 out of which Rs. 3,000 are fixed and rest are variable. It is decided to apportion these costs over different products in the ratio of output. Prepare a statement showing cost of each product and profit according to Absorption Costing.

Page 18: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

18

Solution 3STATEMENT SHOWING COST AND PROFIT

A B C

Per unit Rs.

Total Rs.

Per Unit Rs.

Total Rs.

Per Unit Rs.

Total Rs.

Direct Materials 3 3,000 4 4,000 5 5,000

Direct Labour 2 2,000 3 3,000 4 4,000

Overheads:

Fixed 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,000

Variable 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,000

Total Cost 7 7,000 9 9,000 11 11,000

Profit 3 3,000 6 6,000 9 9,000

Selling Price 10 10,000 15 15,000 20 20,000

Total Profit Rs. 3,000 + Rs. 6,000 + Rs. 9,000 = Rs. 18,000

Page 19: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

19

QUESTIONS ?QUESTIONS ?

Page 20: allocation, absorption & ascertainment of costs

20

Thank youCentum U – Institute of Management & Creative Studies37 Link Road, Lajpat Nagar,New Delhi-110024Tel: 91-11-46120700-04, Toll Free: 1800-103-4457E-mail: [email protected]