all in' in las vegas: maybe the house doesn't always win
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/14/2019 'All In' in Las Vegas: Maybe the House Doesn't Always Win
1/4
36 MADISON MARQUETTE
MARKET WATCH
Las Vegas is battling the economic recession on twofronts a local housing market in disarray and thefirst-ever yearly decline in tourism. Both call into questionwhether widespread speculative development in Las Vegaswill ever be the jackpot it had been.
Steve Wynn, the legendary casino magnate, recentlyadmitted in a 60 Minutes interview that if he had knownthat the economy would have turned down so signifi-cantly, he would not have started his latest casino resort,Encore. Of course, he added that developments likeEncore take many years to come to fruition and the signsof economic distress were not evident when the projectwas being planned four years ago.
Not surprisingly, the hubris that characterized the overalleconomy in recent years was especially evident in Las
Vegas.
No single project embodies this mix of optimism andgambling spirit like MGM Mirages ambitious CityCen-ter. Conceived as the U.S. economy hit its peak, the 16million square foot development in the heart of Te
Strip, includes 5,000 rooms spanning three hotels, a casi-no, shopping mall, and 2,700 condominium units in twotowers. Development costs were a staggering $7.5 billion.Overruns and construction problems have pushed thatnumber to $8.6 billion. oday, disagreements between its
investors and financing challenges have stalled progress.Even though MGM recently paid contractors $70 millionto keep them on the job, the real possibility of an MGMMirage bankruptcy due to the $13 billion in debt it hasamassed puts completion in jeopardy.
Even considered large by Las Vegas standards, CityCenteris simply the latest in a long line of all in bets by de-velopers, who for more than three decades have gambledsuccessfully on the towns unprecedented and consistentgrowth. Based on that track record, it is easy to see whyrampant speculation enjoyed so little scrutiny by bankers,
developers, investors, and retailers.
Te accompanying map of the strip lays out some of therecent projects that have fueled the large-scale condomini-um development boom over the last few years.
By Walter Bialas
Maybe the
House Doesnt
Always Win
All In in
Las Vegas
CityCenterLas Vegas, Nevada
Continues on page 38 >
-
8/14/2019 'All In' in Las Vegas: Maybe the House Doesn't Always Win
2/4
37PLACES MAGAZINE
MARKET WATCH
THE RECENT LAS VEGAS STRIP CONDO BOOM
Sources: LasVegasCondoScene.com, Madison Marquette Market Research
LAS VEGAS
CONVENTION
CENTER
MCCARRAN
INTERNATIONAL
AIRPORT
RIVIERA
CIRCUS
CIRCUS
WYNN
THE VENETIAN
MGM GRAND
TROPICANA
LUXOR
PALMS
EXCALIBUR
NEW YORK
NEW YORK
MONTE CARLO
BELLAGIO
CITYCENTER
COSMOPOLITAN
TRUMP TOWERS
ST. REGIS RESIDENCES
ALLURE
TURNBERRY
TOWERS
TURNBERRY
PLACE
FOUNTAINEBLEAU
HARRAHS
FLAMINGO
HILTON
CAESARS
PALACE
PANORAMA
TOWERS
PALMS
PLACE
THE
MIRAGE
FASHION
SHOW MALL
PLANET
HOLLYWOOD
BALLYS
PARIS
LAS
VEGAS
BLVD
LAS
VEGAS
BLVD
TROPICANA AVE
FLAMINGO AVE
15
15
Because this period is a significant
barometer for Las Vegas future, these
projects may be key to the citys fate:
Allure Las VegasDeveloper: Fifield
Residential Units: 430
Completion Date: 2008
Trouble closing units has forced unusual
marketing strategies. Ran its first auction to
move units in mid-April.
Turnberry TowersDeveloper: Turnberry
Residential Units: 1,340
Completion Date: Tower 1 2007
Tower 2 2008
With the 2nd tower being delivered, resales in
Tower 1 are selling for $100,000 less than pre-
construction prices.
Turnberry PlaceDeveloper: Turnberry
Residential Units: 880
Completion Date: 2006
Some owners walking away since views are
blocked by Fontainebleau.
Fontainebleau
Developer: TurnberryResidential Units: 1,000
Completion Date: Fall 2009
Rumored that developer may not be able to
make payments given current condo pricing.
Trump International TowerDeveloper: Trump
Residential Units: 660
Completion Date: 2008
Sold out but has only closed on 23% of the
units. Second tower postponed.
St. Regis ResidencesDeveloper: Las Vegas SandsResidential Units: 400
Completion Date: 2010
Construction halted in November.
Palms PlaceDeveloper: Maloof
Residential Units: 620
Completion Date: 2008
Only 60% of units sold through March. Units
resold a year after purchase at a 1012% loss.
CosmopolitanDeveloper: 3700 AssociatesResidential Units: 2,000
Completion Date: Late 2009
Project may become part of CityCenter.
CityCenterDeveloper: MGM Mirage
Residential Units: 2,800
Completion Date: 2010
Key investor dropped out. Potential bankruptcy
by developer.
Panorama TowersDeveloper: Hallier PropertiesResidential Units: 1,030
Completion Date: Tower 3 2009
Sales well below expectations.
15
51595
115
GREATER LAS VEGAS
AREAOF
DETAIL
-
8/14/2019 'All In' in Las Vegas: Maybe the House Doesn't Always Win
3/4
38 MADISON MARQUETTE
MARKET WATCH
Tourism A Steady Driver
Anecdotal stories abound that no one is gambling,tourism has tanked, and that hotels are giving awayrooms.
While grounded in some fact, these observations donot paint the complete picture. At least through theend of 2008, Las Vegas tourism remained strong. oput the situation into clearer perspective, 37.5 mil-
lion visitors came to Las Vegas in 2008. Although offits 2007 peak, Las Vegas remained one of the mostpopular tourist destinations in the world. Tese visi-tors were also still spending in the casinos as evidenced
by 2008 gross gaming revenues of $9.8 billion just$1.1 billion shy of the 2007 peak. For the majorityof 2008, hotel occupancy remained strong, under-scoring a market whose economic engine remainedwell-primed when many other parts of the countrywitnessed unprecedented decline. Te accompanyingcharts highlight these long term growth trends in tour-ism and gaming revenues.
Te first part of 2009 shows that there has beensome recent slippage in these year-end numbers. Asof February, total visitors are down 10% and gamingrevenues have declined 17%. Hotel occupancy alsodeclined to 81.5% versus 90.6% the pervious year.
Te problem today is that the regions unchecked
optimism has created a serious disconnect between LasVegas monolithic plans and the realities of a slowingeconomy. In the past, the city was continually re-invented through the development of these large-scaleprojects which spurred further tourist gains as visi-tors flocked to the area to see the new sights.
During these times, the worst that ever happened wasthat too many rooms and casinos were added. De-mand, however, always quickly grew to accommodatethe new rooms and Las Vegas life blood, gaming rev-enues, never really showed any decline. For example,
while national travel patterns dropped precipitouslyafter the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and the tech bust Las Vegas visitation, occupied room nights, andgaming revenues all grew.
This Time is Different A War on Two
Fronts
Te slowing visitor market Las Vegas principal eco-nomic engine is moving negative for essentially thefirst time in 40 years. Tis is happening at a time when8,700 hotel rooms came on-line in 2008, with another
18,000 rooms poised to be added by 2010.
In the past, the Las Vegas economy functioned rela-tively independently because its drivers tourism andgaming were unique and insulated from other partsof the macro economy. In some ways, it could havebeen called recession proof. Tis time, however, thefar-reaching effects of the housing bust have linked LasVegas to the broader economy significantly impact-ing its domestic and international customer base.
The Local Housing Bust
What led Las Vegas into the slowdown was the ex-treme speculation in housing not unlike the specu-lation on the gaming front. Las Vegas is, unfortunately,a case study for many of the most troubled marketsacross the U.S. As such, Las Vegas current economicdownturn is related not only to its own housing bust,but to the national and global repercussions.
It is important to remember that Las Vegas was oneof the first markets to show extreme weakness in the
housing market evident as early as 2006. In a nut-shell, speculators came into the market to make a fastbuck. Te home flipping strategy they employed droveprices up (in what had been a very affordable market).Teir investment activity also created housing demandthat was unreal and unsustainable.
Te National Association of Realtors (NAR) reportedthat the median home price in Las Vegas rose from$132,000 in 2000 to $321,000 by mid-year 2006.Tis equates to an annual appreciation rate of 15%.oday, NAR estimates that the median home price hasfallen to $183,000 an extraordinary decline of 43%from its peak.
What is, perhaps, even more dramatic is the level ofoverbuilding that took place. While a variety of meth-odologies exist to estimate home demand, we looked atthe relationship between residential permit activity andemployment growth. Quite simply new jobs createdemand for new homes.
In looking back, Las Vegas clearly shows a boom-bust
cycle in home construction since the 1980s. As inmany markets, home building periodically gets aheadof demand and then slows to fall back into balance.
For example, looking at the economic expansion of19932000, the region generated 214,500 buildingpermits and added 309,000 jobs. Tis translates into aratio of one new building permit for every 1.44 jobs.
In comparison, between 2000 and 2007 the region
issued 256,100 housing permits on a base of 266,000new jobs a ratio of almost one permit for every onejob. Tis recent one-to-one ratio was clearly not sup-ported by real housing demand, but rather by extensivespeculation from outside the market. Assuming the19932000 ratio of one permit for every 1.44 jobs isabout right for the market, Las Vegas was overbuilt be-tween 2000 and 2007 by as many as 100,000 homes.
Magnitude of the Distress
Realtyrac reports on home foreclosures nationally.Teir data shows that as of first quarter Las Vegasranked at the top of U.S. metro areas, with over35,000 foreclosure filings. Tis equates to almost4.5%, seven times higher than the U.S. average.
As could be expected, the top 10 zip codes with fore-closures in Las Vegas were in the expanding suburbs tothe northwest, southwest, and southeast parts of themetro area. (See accompanying map.) For example,the top ranked zip code (89108) is located in northLas Vegas and has had over 2,200 homes fall into
foreclosure since January 2008. Currently, the medianexisting home value is $132,000 down 32% in thelast year.
Retail has been especially hard hit by the downturn;particularly so in the greater Las Vegas area. Although
VEGAS TOURISM
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1976
1972
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1976
1972
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
As of first quarterLas Vegas rankedat the top of U.S.
metro areas,with over 35,000
foreclosure filings.
LAS VEGAS VISITORS(in millions)
GAMING REVENUES(in $ billions)
Sources: Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority,
Madison Marquette Market Research
> Continued from page 33
All In inLas Vegas
-
8/14/2019 'All In' in Las Vegas: Maybe the House Doesn't Always Win
4/439PLACES MAGAZINE
MARKET WATCH
the pullback in consumer spending is to blame nation-ally the over-speculation in Las Vegas housing hasexacerbated the problem because retail tends to followthe rooftops. Many Las Vegas homes were purchasedby investors who hoped for a quick flip. As such, manywere never occupied or occupied only for a shortperiod as the investor moved on to other speculativeproperties or walked away from a losing bet.
In this way, the driver of retail demand new house-holds and their shopping needs became uncoupledfrom normal market dynamics.
roubled shopping centers can be diffi cult to identify.While percent leased or occupied is easy to track, it ismore diffi cult to uncover centers or retailers within a
center that are under-performing or have an unprofit-able rent to sales ratio.
Recognizing these issues, Madison Marquette analyzedCoStar data and found that Las Vegas is at the topof our list for potentially distressed retail assets, justbehind Phoenix. We have included our list of the mar-kets most likely to see distress on this page.
Our market review underscored that the principaldrivers that put Las Vegas in this position were thesudden increase in vacancy during 2008 when the
market moved from 4.7% at the end of 2007 to 7.6%by the end of last year. At the end of the first quarter,this rate increased to 9.3%. In addition, althoughLas Vegas experienced good net absorption during
the period, 7.8 million square feet of space had beendelivered or was under construction. Importantly, thiscontinued development was taking place in a marketwith weak demand fundamentals as evidenced by alow pre-lease rate in the space under construction.
At this time, a closer look at property-level data showsthat much of the disconnect has occurred in the small-er centers. Based on our review, there are 64 centersin the area (over 50,000 square feet) with occupanciesless than 80%. While some of these centers may stillbe in lease-up, the overall retrenchment of retailers,combined with the tough Las Vegas market suggeststhat many of these centers are now experiencing stress.
The Future
Many observers speculate that commercial propertydefaults will be the second shoe to drop in the reces-sion. In Las Vegas, the first shoe, the housing marketcollapse, was so acute it is easy to understand whyinvestors and developers there are extremely worried.
Earlier bets on Las Vegas continued growth havealways been rewarded. It remains to be seen whetheranother rescue will come or whether a slowdown ingrowth is inevitable because there is a limit to thedemand for the entertainment capital of the world.
Walter Bialas (walter.bialas@madisonmar-
quette.com) is VP, Research in our Washing-
ton, D.C. office. P
POTENTIALLY DISTRESSEDRETAIL MARKETS
Rank City Distress Index
1. Phoenix, AZ 171
2. Las Vegas, NV 145
3. Kansas City, MO 142
4. Atlanta, GA 140
5. Birmingham, AL 140
6. Indianapolis, IN 138
7. Memphis, TN 138
8. Detroit, MI 135
9. Sacramento, CA 134
10. Providence, RI 134
11. Houston, TX 128
12. Dayton, OH 127
13. Dallas/Ft Worth, TX 127
14. Chicago, IL 136
15. Inland Empire, CA 136
16. Tucson, AZ 125
17. Jacksonville, FL 121
18. West Michigan, MI 118
19. Broward County, FL 116
20. Columbus, OH 116
MOST DISTRESSED ZIP CODES
15
15
515
515
215
215
95
95
160
115
215
89131
Total Homes in Foreclosure. . . . . . . . . . .1,940
Households in Foreclosure . . . . . . . . . . . .13%
Avg. Price Decline Last 12 Months . . . -31%Average Foreclosure Price . . . . . . . $223,000
89129
Total Homes in Foreclosure. . . . . . . . . . . 1,810
Households in Foreclosure . . . . . . . . . . . 10%
Avg. Price Decline Last 12 Months . . .-32%
Average Foreclosure Price . . . . . . . $156,000
89108
Total Homes in Foreclosure. . . . . . . . . . .2,210
Households in Foreclosure . . . . . . . . . . . .12%
Avg. Price Decline Last 12 Months . . .-36%
Average Foreclosure Price . . . . . . . .$95,00 0
89148
Total Homes in Foreclosure. . . . . . . . . . 2,000
Households in Foreclosure . . . . . . . . . . . .19%
Avg. Price Decline Last 12 Months . . . -33%
Average Foreclosure Price . . . . . . . .$191,000
89178
Total Homes in Foreclosure. . . . . . . . . . 1,840
Households in Foreclosure . . . . . . . . . . . 24%
Avg. Price Decline Last 12 Months . . . -36%
Average Foreclosure Price . . . . . . . $195,000
89110
Total Homes in Foreclosure. . . . . . . . . 2,160
Households in Foreclosure . . . . . . . . . . 14%
Avg. Price Decline Last 12 Months . -36%Average Foreclosure Price . . . . . . .$96,000
89121
Total Homes in Foreclosure. . . . . . . . . 1,490
Households in Foreclosure . . . . . . . . . . 12%
Avg. Price Decline Last 12 Months . .-32%
Average Foreclosure Price . . . . . . . $117,000
89122
Total Homes in Foreclosure. . . . . . . . . .1,790
Households in Foreclosure . . . . . . . . . . 21%
Avg. Price Decline Last 12 Months . .-37%
Average Foreclosure Price . . . . . . .$113,000
89123
Total Homes in Foreclosure. . . . . . . . . . 1,770
Households in Foreclosure . . . . . . . . . . . 11%
Avg. Price Decline Last 12 Months . . -27%
Average Foreclosure Price . . . . . . $166,000
89183
Total Homes in Foreclosure. . . . . . . . . 1,350
Households in Foreclosure . . . . . . . . . . 15%
Avg. Price Decline Last 12 Months . . -31%
Average Foreclosure Price . . . . . . $134,000
89108
89129
89131
HENDERSON
SUMMERLIN
NELLIS
AFB
NORTH
LAS VEGAS
AIRPORT
MCCARRAN
AIRPORT
89110
89121
89122
89123
89148
8917889183
LAS
VEGAS
STRIP
Sources: RealtyTrac, Madison Marquette Market Research