aligning levels to the european framework the origó experience budapest, february 2006

32
Aligning levels to the Aligning levels to the European Framework European Framework The Origó Experience The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006 Budapest, February 2006

Upload: ethel-hopkins

Post on 28-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Aligning levels to the Aligning levels to the European FrameworkEuropean Framework

The Origó ExperienceThe Origó Experience

Budapest, February 2006Budapest, February 2006

Page 2: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

The number of ORIGÓ exams in 2005The number of ORIGÓ exams in 2005(oral and written):(oral and written):

108 401108 401

Page 3: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

ITK ORIGÓITK ORIGÓ

• The number of languagesThe number of languages:: 2929

• Arabic, Beás- Romani, Bulgarian, Chinese, Croatian, Czech, English, Danish, • Esperanto, Finnish, French, German, Hebrew, Hungarian, Italian, • Latin, Lovari-Romani, Modern-Greek, Old-Greek, Polish, Portugese, • Romanian, Russian, Serb, Spanish, Slovakian, Slovenian, Swedish, Turkish

• 2 testing systems2 testing systems:: Hungarian as a Foreign LanguageHungarian as a Foreign Language - - ALTE-membershipALTE-membership

Page 4: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

The ratio of languages (%) in 2005The ratio of languages (%) in 2005

English 53,0German 25,5Esperanto 6,4French 3,3Lovari 2,5Italian 2,5Spanish 1,7Russian 1,1Latin 1,4Croatian 0,4Romanian 0,3Serb 0,2Slovakian 0,3Other 2,0

Page 5: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

The number of exam centresThe number of exam centres::

70 - accredited/registered70 - accredited/registered

Page 6: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Oral Written

69% 49%

Pass ratePass rate

20052005

Page 7: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Population characteristics: age and sexPopulation characteristics: age and sex

female

male

64%

36%20052005

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

14 21 28 35 42 49 56

férfi

Page 8: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Distribution: age and sex, 2005Distribution: age and sex, 2005

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42

Page 9: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Candidates

• The oldest: 1935. 06. 23., female - Basic German, C, Pass

• The youngest: 1991.12. 14., female - Basic German, A, Passed

• Maximum performance (oral): 62 candidates 100%: English, Arabic, German, Esperanto, Latin, Hungarian, Russian,

Italian, Rumanian, Spanish, Serb, Slovakian, Modern-Greek, Hebrew - Basic-, Intermediate-, Advanced levels

• Maximum performance (written): 9 candidates 100%: Basic English- (5), Basic Hungarian-, Intermediate Italian-, Basic

Spanish-, Basic Modern-Greek

Page 10: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

The Framework levels and The Framework levels and Origó levels ???Origó levels ???

EuropeanCouncil

ITK ORIGÓ Accreditedlanguage

exams

Maturaexams

Cambridge Goethe

C2Mastery CPE

ZOP,KDS

C1Operationalproficiency

Proficiency/Advanced

Proficiency/Advanced

CAE ZMP

B2Vantage Intermediate Intermediate Advanced FCE

B1Threshold Basic Basic PET ZD

A2Waystage

Junior not accredited IntermediateKET

A1Breakthrough

notaccredited

not accredited

Page 11: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

The Hungarian context

• the law 1st September, 2006

• the Accreditation Board July, 2006

• the Matura - one-way equivalence

• international consensus?• levels?

Page 12: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Schedule

• familiarization - scales• specification - documentation• standardization - scales, calibrated samples • empirical validation - calibrated samples,

level setting

Page 13: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Origó - Previous experience

• level setting - empirical

alinging Rigó and international exams (ESU framework, Goethe)

• quality control procedures

• accreditation (1999)

Page 14: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Origó - work accomplished

• schedule• familiarisation (exam developers)

• specification - modifications in Origó scales

suggestions for other modifications

• familiarisation - all oral examiners

Page 15: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Origó - work to follow:

• familiarisation - item writers, markers (written exams)

• benchmarking - sample materials (exam developers)

• standardisation - all examiners

• empirical validation - major languages

Page 16: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Origó - benefits

• positive working experience (CEFR)• useful guidelines (Manual)• useful discussions (awareness raising)• useful modifications

Page 17: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Origó - problem areas

• terminology• translation problems • advanced (C1)/proficiency (C2) levels• availability of sample reference materials• mediation

Page 18: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Terminology„claims”

• linking• relating• harmonizing• aligning• level setting

Page 19: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Translation problems

• „claim”• „a degree of spontaneity and fluency”

Page 20: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Levels

Proficiency (C2)

Advanced (C1)

Page 21: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Difficulties with sample materials

videos in English (Eurocentre, Cambridge)

quality (copy of a copy)

accents (international)

levels

Page 22: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Jihun B2 / intermediate

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

near pass at level good pass

Page 23: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Estelle B2- / intermediate

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

good basic weak interm. interm.

Page 24: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Origó 2004 / intermediate

0

10

20

30

B1 12 B2- 13

B1+ 19 B2 28

B2- 12 B2+ 5

Gábor, 30 Lilla, 35

Page 25: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Renate - / B1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

B1 B2

Page 26: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Annemarie - / C1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

B2 C1

Page 27: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Evgeny C1 / Proficiency

0

5

10

15

20

25

good interm. weak prof. prof.

Page 28: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Familiarization - scales

Pragmatic competence item 4 A1:2 A2:135 B1:6

item 3 B1:53 B2:83

Strategic competence item 1 A2:46 B1:78 B2:13

item 5 B2:26 C1:106

Language competence item 1 B2:3 C1:94

item 4 B1:34 B2:59

Page 29: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Interpretation of data

IRT information - Eurocentre

- Dialang, Cambridge, Finnish Matriculation

not enough background info for reproduction

no measuring instruments attached

Page 30: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Reference measures

Eurocentre Dialangreading

Cambridgereading

Finnishreading

C2 3.90 2.01 70-90 (80) 47-50

C1 2.80 1.23 61-81 (71) 40-46

B2 0.72 0.21 57-72 (62) 25-39

B1 -1.23 -.22 50-70 (56) 8-24

A2 -3.23 -.56 30-50 (41) 4-7

A1 -4.29 -.94 3

Page 31: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Origó IRT measures (grammar)

Intermediate Proficiency

English 1.10 – 1.25 1.60 – 1.80

German 1.00 –1.20 1.30 – 1.70

French 1.20 – 1.40

Spanish 1.10 – 1.40

Italian 1.50 – 1.80

Russian 1.20 – 1.50

Esperanto 1.20 – 1.30

Lovari 1.20 – 1.30

Latin 1.60 – 1.90

Page 32: Aligning levels to the European Framework The Origó Experience Budapest, February 2006

Origó - Mediation

• major difficulty: no CEFR scales• no Council of Europe sample materials• external validation? • accreditation?