aligning bristol’s one city plan with the sdgs · ll ai li iii microgrant progra april 2019 local...
TRANSCRIPT
Local Data Action Solutions Initiative 2018-2019 Microgrant Program
April 2019
Local Data Action Solutions Initiative 2018-2019 Microgrant Program
Aligning Bristol’s One City Plan with the SDGs
2
ACKNOWLEDGMENTSWritten by Sean Fox and Allan Macleod, University of
Bristol. Editing by Sandra Ruckstuhl, Jessica Espey, and
Jay Neuner. Design by Micha Dugan, Ryan Swaney, and
Jay Neuner.
Project Team
3
ABOUTThe Local Data Action Solutions Initiative (LDA-SI) was established as a
joint effort between the Sustainable Development Solutions Network’s
Thematic Research Network on Data and Statistics (SDSN TReNDS) and the
U.S.A. Sustainable Cities Initiative as a program with one primary objective:
to identify and promote replicable methods for sub-national Sustainable
Development Goal (SDG) monitoring that facilitate local action in support
of the “leave no one behind” principle. A growing number of subnational
actors are attempting to implement the SDGs locally and are confronting
specific questions related to data collection and monitoring. With this has
grown the need for real, practical lessons and guidance that can be applied
to different contexts worldwide.
For this reason, LDA-SI launched a microgrant initiative to support learning
from existing subnational SDG data initiatives, harnessing this tacit local
knowledge and informing a learning exchange. In 2018, five grantees were
chosen both for their proven ability to support SDG implementation in a
specified location and for their model’s relevance and potential benefit for
other sub-national SDG initiatives in the world. Each grantee has prepared
a guidance brief that describes SDG localization challenges in the place
where they are operating and the data solutions they have designed to
support efforts toward SDG achievement.
Learn more at sdsntrends.org/ldasigrants.
4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abstract............................................................................................. 5
Problem............................................................................................. 5
Solution............................................................................................. 8
Building Process............................................................................. 10
Strengths and Weaknesses......................................................... 16
References and Additional Resources..................................... 18
Annexes............................................................................................ 20
Endnotes.......................................................................................... 43
5
ABSTRACTThe City of Bristol in the United Kingdom has pledged its support to
the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and has worked to identify
alignment between the Goals and the recently launched One City Plan.
This plan articulates a vision for the city and a set of explicit targets to
be achieved by 2050. Alignment with the goals was achieved through a
12-month partnership between the University of Bristol, Bristol City Council,
and two key networks of stakeholders. Through this process, a mapping
exercise was undertaken to identify a framework for monitoring progress
against the targets embedded in both the One City Plan and the SDGs.
This process highlighted obstacles such as the paucity of local-level indi-
cators that matched the official indicators of the Inter-agency and Expert
Group on SDG Indicators (IAEG-SDG) and the limited relevance of some
official IAEG-SDG indicators to city-level monitoring. A methodology was
developed to assess the relevance of target areas and to identify contextu-
ally-relevant local indicators and proxies to assess progress. This involved
consulting city council experts, partner organizations, civic leaders, and
academics, and has helped increase resources with which key Bristol
institutions can engage to understand the SDGs at the local level.
PROBLEMBristol is a thriving U.K. city experiencing strong economic growth1. It is
also widely seen as the UK’s most sustainable city and was awarded the
status of European Green Capital in 2015. The city has a diverse and
nationally-renowned cultural, arts, and music scene, and is frequently
voted one of the best places to live in the U.K.2 and even the world3. Yet
6
Bristol faces challenges: There are around 300 premature deaths a year
due to poor air quality; the disparity in access to higher education is almost
80 percent between local government wards; 19,700 (24 percent) of all
Bristol’s children live in income-deprived households; nearly 16 percent of
the population live in parts of the city that are in the top 10 percent of most
deprived of areas in England; and the gap in life expectancy between some
wards is as large as 12 years4.
In an effort to develop a more coherent and joined-up approach to tackling
these challenges against the backdrop of a prolonged program of budget
cuts imposed by central government, the city embarked on a major new
strategic planning initiative and reform of governance structures.
The result was Bristol’s One City Plan5 (Box 1) and new governance
arrangements designed to improve coordination between units within the
Council, and between the Council and key stakeholders in the city.
This reform moment offered a unique opportunity to align the city’s stra-
tegic One City Plan with the SDGs and develop a harmonized monitoring
framework to track progress against both. However, while there was
political will both within the Mayor’s Office and among many external stake-
holders to integrate the SDGs into the One City Plan and in a planned “city
dashboard,” there was insufficient capacity and expertise to achieve this.
Lack of capacity was compounded by the complexities of monitoring the
SDGs locally, for which there was limited freely available guidance. Aside
from the IAEG-SDG indicators (many of which are irrelevant to cities6) there
is an ever-expanding number of city sustainability metrics, but none map
perfectly to the IAEG-SDG indicator framework7.
7
In sum, Bristol faced the challenge of aligning a locally-developed strategic
plan with the SDGs and establishing a harmonized framework for monitor-
ing progress against the backdrop of acute resource and
capacity constraints.
Box 1. Bristol’s One City Plan
In January 2019 Bristol launched the first iteration of the One City Plan,
outlining the following vision:
By 2050, Bristol is a fair, healthy, and sustainable city. A city of hope and
aspiration, where everyone can share in its success.
The One City Plan was championed by the mayor and the city council and
developed through extensive consultation, including five “city gatherings”
with key city leaders across the public, private, and nonprofit sectors; over
30 engagement events with more than 300 attendees from all sectors of
society; and weekly drop-in sessions over the course of a year for resi-
dents, stakeholders, and civil servants to share their opinions on how the
plan should develop. The resulting document is meant to reflect the city’s
collective direction of progress and the current ideas as to how to move
there. However, while it is intended to be a strategic document, it is not
meant to be static. The aim is to annually update the plan through iterative
consultation to be responsive to shifting priorities, challenges, and political
change. The plan is organized around six core themes: Connectivity,
Economy, Environment, Health and Well-being, Homes and Communities,
Learning and Skills. These are not to be understood in isolation, but rather
8
SOLUTIONOur solution to these challenges involved three steps: (1) establishing
knowledge partnerships, (2) target mapping, and (3) indicator identification
and harmonization.
The first obstacle to overcome was the lack of capacity and expertise
needed to align the developing One City Plan with the SDGs and establish
a harmonized monitoring framework. This was overcome through a unique
partnership between the University of Bristol, Bristol City Council, and two
networks. The first, Bristol Green Capital Partnership, is a well established
network of over 800 organizations committed to “working towards Bristol
becoming a sustainable city with a high-quality of life for all.” The second is
a more recently established stakeholder network known
as the Bristol SDG Alliance (Box 2), devoted explicitly to promoting the
implementation and monitoring of the SDGs locally.
as interconnected. A systems thinking approach embedded in the plan
encourages leaders from these areas to understand and consider the
implications that their policies and decisions have on other themes and
objectives for the city. By considering the interrelations and interactions
within the plan in a holistic manner, decision-makers are better able
improve positive interactions and reduce the negative. This inherent inter-
relatedness of the plan lends itself to the application of the SDGs.
Box 1 continued
9
These partnerships helped to establish the capacity needed to undertake
a target mapping exercise. By applying the tool outlined in “Hacking the
SDGs for US Cities”9, which provides a methodology for understanding the
SDG targets and the IAEG-SDG indicators in the context of a city, we identi-
fied a sub-set of 75 relevant targets and 50 relevant indicators for Bristol.
The final step involved identifying specific indicators that could be used to
monitor objectives set out in the One City Plan and the SDGs.
This involved a wide-ranging review of existing city monitoring frameworks
and the identification of specific indicators that overlapped with both
One City Plan objectives and the SDGs. This has been complemented by
ongoing consultation with City Council teams responsible for delivering
these objectives and with the city’s data team to identify what data are
actually available. While this process is not complete as of this writing,
the final result will be a set of indicators suitable for monitoring both locally
defined priorities and the SDGs.
Box 2. The Bristol SDG Alliance
The Alliance is a network of 70-plus stakeholders from across Bristol who
are interested in driving the Sustainable Development Goals in Bristol.
Established at the start of 2016 after meetings to consider how the SDGs
could be applied in Bristol, the Alliance incorporates members from public,
private, and third sector organizations, including groups that focus on all
three aspects of sustainable development (economic, environmental, and
social). The Alliance has been involved in local, regional, and national
advocacy for the uptake of the SDGs more broadly and it has been key in
leveraging resource to develop SDG activity in Bristol8.
10
1
BUILDING PROCESS
Building Knowledge Partnerships
The formation of strategic partnerships began in 2016 when the Bristol SDG
Alliance submitted a proposal to the University of Bristol for a graduate
student research project. A group of students was tasked with conducting
an initial assessment of the relevance of the goals to the city and a survey
of local SDG initiatives. As a result of this report and increased interest
in understanding the SDGs in the context of Bristol, the Alliance and the
Bristol Green Capital Partnership teamed up with an academic at the uni-
versity to apply for funding to pursue further local implementation through
the creation of an SDG Research and Engagement Associate (“Associate”)
position; this aimed to provide increased capacity for the University of Bris-
tol, the City Council, and the Bristol Green Capital Partnership to engage
with the SDGs. This full-time paid position was funded for 12 months from
the university’s Strategic Research Fund. Follow-on funding to extend the
post for six months in order to produce a Voluntary Local Review (VLR) was
subsequently secured from the University’s Economic and Social Research
Council Impact Acceleration Account. The Associate position was filled
through a competitive recruitment process.
The Associate was tasked with supporting coordination among stake-
holders in the Alliance in collaboration with the Bristol Green Capital
Partnership and serving as an embedded advocate for the SDGs within the
City Council. The creation of this post was particularly important for the City
Council as it added dedicated capacity to explore integrating the SDGs into
planning and monitoring processes at a time of wide-ranging budget cuts.
11
The Associate began by reviewing existing academic and practitioner
literature on SDG localization, including those produced by the Global
Taskforce of Local and Regional Governments. The next step involved
consulting with members of the Alliance and city partners (including Bris-
tol’s European Union Office). The online publication of a report outlining
Bristol’s growing engagement with the SDGs10, which coincided with the
2018 High-level Political Forum, as well as blog posts and social media
activity helped increase awareness of the work being done in Bristol and
led to new international contacts and knowledge sharing opportunities.
Over the course of 12 months, we received invitations to attend workshops
and conferences where we were able to learn from other cities undertaking
similar initiatives at the time, such as Baltimore, Manheim, Malmö, Han-
nover, Los Angeles, New York, San José, Mexico City, Bogotá, and Nairobi.
The insights gained from this research, consultation, and networking were
used to provide direct advice and support to the City Council team working
on developing the One City Plan. The result was successful alignment of
locally generated goals with the SDGs.
Target Mapping
As the One City Plan was being developed, the Associate undertook a
mapping exercise with colleagues from the City Office team, the Council
data team and the thematic leads from the One City Plan to assess the
local relevance of SDG targets. There were two mapping stages:
First, the “Hacking the SDGs” methodology developed at the Urban
Institute11 was adapted and applied to assess the relevance of the SDG
2
12
targets to Bristol. A target was deemed relevant if city leaders could directly
influence progress through public policies, programs and initiatives.
Generally, there were three reasons why a target was deemed irrelevant:
(1) if the target focused on or was limited to developing or least developed
countries, (2) if the target explicitly referenced laws or policies at higher
levels of government, or (3) if the target addressed sustainable develop-
ment issues that occur outside urban contexts. This process, which was
undertaken early in the development of the One City Plan, identified 75
SDG targets relevant for Bristol.
Second, we identified SDG targets that were relevant to the specific objec-
tives articulated in the final One City Plan, which contains 558 initiatives,
objectives, and milestones—many of which were adapted directly from the
SDGs or aligned to the SDGs. This exercise yielded a set of 79 targets that
were directly relevant to the plan and contained most, but not all, of the 75
targets that the “Hacking the SDGs” method had identified
as relevant to Bristol. The discrepancy between the research methodology
and the applied target mapping can largely be attributed to a more expan-
sive interpretation of the SDG targets in the second round of mapping.
One such example is SDG target 9.c: “Significantly increase access to
information and communications technology [ICT] and strive to provide
universal and affordable access to the Internet in least developed countries
by 2020.” Our initial mapping excluded this target for Bristol because it
refers explicitly to “least developed countries.” However, there is a big
digital divide within Bristol, and addressing this by improving broadband
access in social housing is one of the objectives in the One City Plan.
13
While Bristol cannot monitor progress on expanding ICT in least developed
countries, it can and should monitor and report on progress in addressing
its own digital divide in the spirit of the SDG’s underlying principle of “leave
no one behind.”
In sum, an initial mapping using the “Hacking the SDGs” approach iden-
tified 75 locally relevant SDGs targets that could be monitored, while the
second mapping against the final One City Plan yielded a slightly different
set of 79 locally relevant targets when a more expansive interpretation of
the goals was applied. Although the final monitoring framework has yet to
be finalised, this latter set is likely to form the basis for Bristol’s efforts to
monitor progress against both local priorities and the SDGs.
Indicator Identification and Harmonization
Having conducted a mapping of targets, the final step was to identify
specific indicators that were suitable for monitoring the One City Plan
objectives alongside the SDGs. This was done through consultation with
the city’s data team, as well as a survey of existing city data frameworks
used elsewhere in the world. The objective was to develop a harmonized
indicator framework that allows us to monitor progress towards locally-de-
fined goals and the SDGs in a way that also facilitates comparison with
other cities around the world.
Using the Greene and Meixell methodology for identifying suitable city-
level indicators, we identified 50 out of the 244 that were relevant for
Bristol. We arrived at this figure by discounting all IAEG-SDG indicators
linked to targets that had been found irrelevant in Step 2 and reviewing
3
14
the remainder, many of which were irrelevant because of their national or
international focus. For example, while Target 13.1 (“Strengthen resilience
and adaptive capacity to climate related hazards”) is certainly relevant for
the city, two of the three associated indicators are inappropriate due to
their national and international scope.
To fill gaps in our indicator framework, we then turned our focus to the
ever-growing number of alternative urban indicator frameworks, many of
which have been mapped onto the SDGs. To generate ideas about the best
indicators for Bristol, we compared the most popular indictor frameworks to
identify overlaps, omissions, and synergy with the One City Plan objectives
and the SDGs (see Table 1).
This overlap assessment provided us with an extra set of common urban
sustainability indicators, often filling gaps left in the IAEG-SDG indicators
(e.g. Gini coefficient, Average Daily Travel time, and square meters of public
indoor/outdoor recreation space per capita). These additional 58 indicators
were added to the 50 SDG indicators previously identified to form the basis
for our monitoring framework.
15
The indicator frameworks assessed including the number of indicators they con-tain and the number of cities that are currently monitored by these frameworks.
Indicator Framework Number of Indicators Number of Cities
SDGs12 232 N/A
World Council on City Data ISO 3712013 100 79+
United Smart Cities Smart Sustainable Cities14 90 50+
IESCE Cities in motion index15 79 180
SDSN U.S.A. Cities Index16 44 100
Arcadis Sustainable Cities17 32 100
Indicators for Sustainability18 32 11
UN-Habitat City Prosperity Index19 25 400
Urban Ecosystem Europe20 25 32
Table 1. Indicator Framework
Our final step was to assess the availability of data through consultation
with the City Council’s data experts. Potential sources include council
plans and documents, Bristol’s “Quality of life” survey, the “State of Bristol”
documents, and the Bristol Open Data platform. Many of these indicators
mapped well onto the targets for the city or filled in the gaps where SDG
indicators were not relevant. In a handful of cases, we drafted our own
alternative indicators where no suitable precedent was found (Table 2). The
wording of these was designed (a) to be suitable to the city scale, and (b) to
reflect the fact that progress is not necessarily the sole responsibility of city
governments by referring to “policies or initiatives.”
Using the SDG targets that had been mapped onto local priority aims,
proxy measurements were developed in place of irrelevant or unrecorded
IAEG-SDG indicators. Using the indicators that local experts were already
16
monitoring and that the city was already assessing made it easier to under-
stand the progress the city was making towards the SDGs through indirect
measures. The final proposed indicator framework is provided in Annex A.
SDG Target Alternative Indicator
5.6 Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights as agreed in accordance with the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development and the Beijing Platform for Action and the outcome documents of their review conferences
Have new policies or initiatives been implemented in Bristol to improve access to sexual and reproductive health care?
5.c Adopt and strengthen sound policies and enforceable legislation for the promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls at all levels
Have new policies or initiatives been implemented to improve gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls in Bristol?
13.2 Integrate climate change measures into (national) policies, strategies and planning
Have new climate change policies or initiatives been introduced by city stakeholders?
15.9 By 2020, integrate ecosystem and biodiversity values into national and local planning, development processes, poverty reduction strategies and accounts
Have new ecosystem and biodiversity values been integrated into planning processes or development initiatives in Bristol?
17.17 Encourage and promote effective public, public-private and civil society partnerships, building on the experience and resourcing strategies of partnerships
Have new public, public-private and civil society partnerships formed in Bristol to enhance capacity to achieve local sustainability goals?
Table 2. Alternative Indicators to Monitor Specific Targets
STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSESStrengths
The integration of the SDGs into the One City Plan and the development of
a harmonized indicator framework was made possible through partnerships
and the creation of a dedicated post funded by the University of Bristol.
For other cities facing similarly acute resource constraints, leveraging
partnerships may be the only means of securing the resources required to
overcome the considerable “learning costs” associated with developing a
practical framework for monitoring the SDGs locally.
17
A second strength of our approach was the harmonization of the
monitoring framework achieved by identifying indicators that were directly
relevant to locally defined objectives as well as the SDGs. This will institu-
tionalize SDG monitoring going forward as it will not require a separate or
additional activity for the Council. Moreover, the process of harmonization
required extensive consultation, which increased awareness of the SDGs
within the council.
Finally, adopting a more expansive interpretation of the SDG targets and
drawing on alternative indicator frameworks to fill gaps where IAEG-SDG
indicators were simply irrelevant has allowed for the development of a
framework that is both comprehensive and locally appropriate. Moreover,
because the alternative indicators were drawn from indicators already in
use by many other cities, this will increase comparability between Bristol
and other cities.
Weaknesses
Like many cities, the functional area of Bristol is much larger than
the area controlled and monitored by Bristol City Council. The City of
Bristol has a population of roughly a half million people. However, the
functional area of the city is over one million people. Monitoring progress
towards the SDGs in the core could be highly misleading. For example, a
reduction in homelessness in the City of Bristol could correspond with an
increase in a local authority area that is just meters away. Resolving the
appropriate geographic scale of measurement for local monitoring is an
unresolved challenge.
18
A second weakness relates to the limited consultation on data sources,
largely due to time and resource constraints. We know that “official” data
developed and curated by the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics has
significant limitations and omissions. Although we did look at other sources,
there is likely a wealth of information being collected by firms and nonprofit
organizations that could provide more granular insight into changes directly
relevant to the SDG progress. Expanding the sources of data used for
local monitoring could greatly enrich our understanding of relevant local
conditions and trends, as evidenced by the work of the Sustainable Devel-
opment Solutions Network’s Local Data Action grantees.
REFERENCES AND ADDITIONAL RESOURCESAmbiente Italia. 2007. “Urban Ecosystem Europe: An Integrated Assess-
ment on the Sustainability of 32 European Cities.” http://www.dexia.com/
EN/journalist/press_releases/Documents/20080201_urban_ecosys-
tem_UK.pdf.
Ahvenniemi, Hannele, Aapo Huovila, Isabel Pinto-Seppä, and Miimu
Airaksinen. 2017. “What Are the Differences between Sustainable and
Smart Cities?” Cities 60 (February): 234–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cit-
ies.2016.09.009.
Arcadis. 2016. “Sustainable Cities Index 2016.” https://www.arcadis.com/
media/0/6/6/%7B06687980-3179-47AD-89FD-F6AFA76EBB73%7DSustain-
able%20Cities%20Index%202016%20Global%20Web.pdf.
BBC News. 2017. “Bristol Named Best Place to Live in Britain in 2017.”
March 19, 2017. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-39320118.
19
Bristol City Office. 2019. “One City Plan.” Bristol. https://www.bristolonecity.
com/one-city-plan.
Espey, Jessica, Hayden Dahmm, Laurie Manderino, John Biberman, Yingxin
Ye, Gary Verburg, and Juan Puyana. 2018. “Leaving No U.S. City Behind:
The U.S. Cities Sustainable Development Goals Index 2018.” http://unsdsn.
org/resources/publications/leaving-no-u-s-city-behind-the-2018-u-s-cities-
sdgs-index.
McCarney, Patricia, James Patava, Birgitte Hansen, Matthew Lynch, Sahifa
Imran, and Nicholas Bakewell. 2017. “WCCD City Data for the United
Nations Sustainable Development Goals 2017.” Toronto: World Council on
City Data (WCCD). https://www.dataforcities.org/publications.
United for Smart Sustainable Cities. 2018. “United for Smart Sustainable
Cities: United Smart Cities Index.” https://www.itu.int/en/publications/Docu-
ments/tsb/2017-U4SSC-Collection-Methodology/mobile/index.html.
20
AN
NEX
SDG
SDG
Tar
get
Indi
cato
r In
dica
tor 2
Indi
cato
r 3In
dica
tor 4
Indi
cato
r 5So
urce
1So
urce
2So
urce
3So
urce
4So
urce
5
1.2 B
y 20
30, r
educ
e at
le
ast b
y ha
lf th
e pr
opor
tion
of m
en,
wom
en a
nd c
hild
ren
of
all a
ges
livin
g in
po
verty
in a
ll its
di
men
sion
s ac
cord
ing
to n
atio
nal d
efin
ition
s
1.2.1
Prop
ortio
n of
po
pula
tion
livin
g be
low
the
natio
nal
pove
rty li
ne, b
y se
x an
d ag
e
1.2.2
Pro
porti
on o
f m
en, w
omen
and
ch
ildre
n of
all
ages
livi
ng in
po
verty
in a
ll its
di
men
sion
s ac
cord
ing
to
natio
nal d
efin
ition
s
Redu
ce th
e ga
p in
ea
rnin
gs
betw
een
the
top
10%
and
bo
ttom
10%
of
wag
es
SDG
s/Ci
ty
Sust
aina
bilit
y In
dexe
sSD
Gs
Bris
tol C
ity
Coun
cil D
ata
Team
1.3 Im
plem
ent n
atio
nally
ap
prop
riate
soc
ial
prot
ectio
n sy
stem
s an
d m
easu
res
for a
ll,
incl
udin
g flo
ors,
and
by
2030
ach
ieve
su
bsta
ntia
l cov
erag
e of
th
e po
or a
nd th
e vu
lner
able
1.3.1
Prop
ortio
n of
po
pula
tion
cove
red
by s
ocia
l pro
tect
ion
floor
s/sy
stem
s, b
y se
x, d
istin
guis
hing
ch
ildre
n,
unem
ploy
ed
pers
ons,
old
er
pers
ons,
per
sons
w
ith d
isab
ilitie
s,
preg
nant
wom
en,
new
born
s, w
ork-
inju
ry v
ictim
s an
d th
e po
or a
nd th
e vu
lner
able
SDG
s 1.5
By
2030
, bui
ld th
e re
silie
nce
of th
e po
or
and
thos
e in
vul
nera
ble
situ
atio
ns a
nd re
duce
th
eir e
xpos
ure
and
vuln
erab
ility
to c
limat
e-re
late
d ex
trem
e ev
ents
an
d ot
her e
cono
mic
, so
cial
and
en
viro
nmen
tal s
hock
s an
d di
sast
ers
11.5
.2 D
irect
ec
onom
ic lo
ss in
re
latio
n to
glo
bal
GD
P, d
amag
e to
cr
itica
l inf
rast
ruct
ure
and
num
ber o
f di
srup
tions
to b
asic
se
rvic
es, a
ttrib
uted
to
dis
aste
rs
Num
ber o
f di
sast
er re
late
d de
aths
per
100
000
popu
latio
nSD
Gs
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
inde
xes
SDG
1: N
o Po
vert
y
Indi
cato
r Fra
mew
ork
21
2.1 B
y 20
30, e
nd
hung
er a
nd e
nsur
e ac
cess
by
all p
eopl
e, in
pa
rticu
lar t
he p
oor a
nd
peop
le in
vul
nera
ble
situ
atio
ns, i
nclu
ding
in
fant
s, to
saf
e, n
utrit
ious
an
d su
ffici
ent f
ood
all
year
roun
d
num
ber o
f mis
sing
m
eals
per
per
son
(mea
l gap
)
Num
ber o
f peo
ple
expe
rienc
ing
food
in
secu
rity
Redu
ce fo
od
pove
rty
(def
initi
on fr
om
Qua
lity
of L
ife
surv
ey)
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads
Bris
tol C
ity
Coun
cil D
ata
Team
2.2
By 2
030,
end
all
form
s of
mal
nutri
tion,
in
clud
ing
achi
evin
g, b
y 20
25, t
he in
tern
atio
nally
ag
reed
targ
ets
on
stun
ting
and
was
ting
in
child
ren
unde
r 5 y
ears
of
age
, and
add
ress
the
nutri
tiona
l nee
ds o
f ad
oles
cent
girl
s,
preg
nant
and
lact
atin
g w
omen
and
old
er
pers
ons
% o
besi
ty a
nd
over
wei
ght i
n ch
ildre
n in
Yea
r 6
% c
hild
ren
atte
ndin
g sc
hool
hu
ngry
Hap
py C
ity
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads
2.4
By 2
030,
ens
ure
sust
aina
ble
food
pr
oduc
tion
syst
ems
and
impl
emen
t res
ilien
t ag
ricul
tura
l pra
ctic
es
that
incr
ease
pr
oduc
tivity
and
pr
oduc
tion,
that
hel
p m
aint
ain
ecos
yste
ms,
th
at s
treng
then
cap
acity
fo
r ada
ptat
ion
to c
limat
e ch
ange
, ext
rem
e w
eath
er, d
roug
ht,
flood
ing
and
othe
r di
sast
ers
and
that
pr
ogre
ssiv
ely
impr
ove
land
and
soi
l qua
lity
2.4.
1 Pro
porti
on o
f ag
ricul
tura
l are
a un
der p
rodu
ctiv
e an
d su
stai
nabl
e ag
ricul
ture
SDG
s
SDG
2:
Zero
H
unge
r
22
3.1 B
y 20
30, r
educ
e th
e gl
obal
mat
erna
l m
orta
lity
ratio
to le
ss
than
70
per 1
00,0
00
live
birth
s3.
1.1 M
ater
nal
mor
talit
y ra
tioSD
Gs
3.2
By 2
030,
end
pr
even
tabl
e de
aths
of
new
born
s an
d ch
ildre
n un
der 5
yea
rs o
f age
, w
ith a
ll co
untri
es a
imin
g to
redu
ce n
eona
tal
mor
talit
y to
at l
east
as
low
as
12 p
er 1,
000
live
birth
s an
d un
der-5
m
orta
lity
to a
t lea
st a
s lo
w a
s 25
per
1,00
0 liv
e bi
rths
3.2.
1 Und
er-5
m
orta
lity
rate
SDG
s
3.3
By 2
030,
end
the
epid
emic
s of
AID
S,
tube
rcul
osis
, mal
aria
an
d ne
glec
ted
tropi
cal
dise
ases
and
com
bat
hepa
titis
, wat
er-b
orne
di
seas
es a
nd o
ther
co
mm
unic
able
dis
ease
s
3.3.
1 Num
ber o
f new
H
IV in
fect
ions
per
1,0
00 u
ninf
ecte
d po
pula
tion,
by
sex,
ag
e an
d ke
y po
pula
tions
3.3.
2 Tu
berc
ulos
is
inci
denc
e pe
r 10
0,00
0 po
pula
tion
SDG
s SD
Gs
3.4
By 2
030,
redu
ce b
y on
e th
ird p
rem
atur
e m
orta
lity
from
non
-co
mm
unic
able
dis
ease
s th
roug
h pr
even
tion
and
treat
men
t and
pro
mot
e m
enta
l hea
lth a
nd w
ell-
bein
g
Year
s of
Pot
entia
l Li
fe L
ost –
an
age
and
sex
stan
dard
ised
m
easu
re o
f pr
emat
ure
deat
h
Mor
talit
y fro
m
caus
es th
at a
re
prev
enta
ble
Hap
py C
ityH
appy
City
SDG
3:
Goo
d H
ealth
an
d W
ellb
eing
23
3.5
Stre
ngth
en th
e pr
even
tion
and
treat
men
t of s
ubst
ance
ab
use,
incl
udin
g na
rcot
ic d
rug
abus
e an
d ha
rmfu
l use
of a
lcoh
ol
Initi
ativ
es ta
ken
or
supp
orte
d to
en
gage
peo
ple
in
heal
th in
terv
entio
ns
(e.g
. sto
p sm
okin
g,
obes
ity, a
lcoh
olis
m,
drug
s, e
tc) o
r w
ellb
eing
initi
ativ
es
in th
e co
mm
unity
, in
clud
ing
phys
ical
3.5.
1 Cov
erag
e of
tre
atm
ent
inte
rven
tions
(p
harm
acol
ogic
al,
psyc
hoso
cial
and
re
habi
litat
ion
and
afte
rcar
e se
rvic
es)
for s
ubst
ance
use
di
sord
ers
3.5.
2 H
arm
ful
use
of a
lcoh
ol,
defin
ed
acco
rdin
g to
th
e na
tiona
l co
ntex
t as
alco
hol p
er
capi
ta
cons
umpt
ion
(age
d 15
yea
rs
and
olde
r) w
ithin
a
cale
ndar
yea
r in
litre
s of
pu
re a
lcoh
olSV
PSD
Gs
SDG
s
3.6
By 2
020,
hal
ve th
e nu
mbe
r of g
loba
l de
aths
and
inju
ries
from
ro
ad tr
affic
acc
iden
ts
Dea
ths
and
inju
ries
from
road
traf
fic
acci
dent
s
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
Inde
xes
3.7
By 2
030,
ens
ure
univ
ersa
l acc
ess
to
sexu
al a
nd
repr
oduc
tive
heal
th-
care
ser
vice
s, in
clud
ing
for f
amily
pla
nnin
g,
info
rmat
ion
and
educ
atio
n, a
nd th
e in
tegr
atio
n of
re
prod
uctiv
e he
alth
into
na
tiona
l stra
tegi
es a
nd
prog
ram
mes
3.7.
1 Pro
porti
on o
f w
omen
of
repr
oduc
tive
age
(age
d 15
–49
year
s)
who
hav
e th
eir
need
for f
amily
pl
anni
ng s
atis
fied
with
mod
ern
met
hods
3.7.
2 Ad
oles
cent
bi
rth ra
te (a
ged
10–1
4 ye
ars;
age
d 15
–19
year
s) p
er
1,000
wom
en in
th
at a
ge g
roup
SDG
s SD
Gs
3.8
Achi
eve
univ
ersa
l he
alth
cov
erag
e,
incl
udin
g fin
anci
al ri
sk
prot
ectio
n, a
cces
s to
qu
ality
ess
entia
l hea
lth-
care
ser
vice
s an
d ac
cess
to s
afe,
ef
fect
ive,
qua
lity
and
affo
rdab
le e
ssen
tial
med
icin
es a
nd v
acci
nes
for a
ll
3.b.
1 Pro
porti
on o
f th
e ta
rget
po
pula
tion
cove
red
by a
ll va
ccin
es
incl
uded
in th
eir
natio
nal p
rogr
amm
e
Gap
in h
ealth
y lif
e ex
pect
ancy
be
twee
n th
e m
ost
and
leas
t de
priv
ed a
reas
of
Bris
tol
SDG
s
Bris
tol C
ity
Coun
cil D
ata
Team
SDG
3:
Goo
d H
ealth
an
d W
ellb
eing
24
3.9
By 2
030,
su
bsta
ntia
lly re
duce
the
num
ber o
f dea
ths
and
illne
sses
from
ha
zard
ous
chem
ical
s an
d ai
r, w
ater
and
soi
l po
llutio
n an
d co
ntam
inat
ion
3.9.
1 Mor
talit
y ra
te
attri
bute
d to
ho
useh
old
and
ambi
ent a
ir po
llutio
n
Vehi
cles
em
issi
ons:
Dea
ths
attri
buta
ble
to a
ir po
llutio
n / l
evel
s of
NO
2SD
Gs
Them
e le
ads
3.a
Stre
ngth
en th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e W
orld
Hea
lth
Org
aniz
atio
n Fr
amew
ork
Conv
entio
n on
Tob
acco
Con
trol i
n al
l cou
ntrie
s, a
s ap
prop
riate
Initi
ativ
es ta
ken
or
supp
orte
d to
en
gage
peo
ple
in
heal
th in
terv
entio
ns
(e.g
. sto
p sm
okin
g,
obes
ity, a
lcoh
olis
m,
drug
s, e
tc) o
r w
ellb
eing
initi
ativ
es
in th
e co
mm
unity
, in
clud
ing
phys
ical
SV
P
SDG
3:
Goo
d H
ealth
an
d W
ellb
eing
25
3.b
Supp
ort t
he
rese
arch
and
de
velo
pmen
t of
vacc
ines
and
med
icin
es
for t
he c
omm
unic
able
an
d no
n-co
mm
unic
able
di
seas
es th
at p
rimar
ily
affe
ct d
evel
opin
g co
untri
es, p
rovi
de
acce
ss to
affo
rdab
le
esse
ntia
l med
icin
es a
nd
vacc
ines
, in
acco
rdan
ce
with
the
Doh
a D
ecla
ratio
n on
the
TRIP
S Ag
reem
ent a
nd
Publ
ic H
ealth
, whi
ch
affir
ms
the
right
of
deve
lopi
ng c
ount
ries
to
use
to th
e fu
ll th
e pr
ovis
ions
in th
e Ag
reem
ent o
n Tr
ade-
Rela
ted
Aspe
cts
of
Inte
llect
ual P
rope
rty
Righ
ts re
gard
ing
flexi
bilit
ies
to p
rote
ct
publ
ic h
ealth
, and
, in
parti
cula
r, pr
ovid
e ac
cess
to m
edic
ines
for
all
Rate
of
inap
prop
riate
pr
escr
ibin
g of
an
tibio
tics
3.b.
1 Pro
porti
on o
f th
e ta
rget
po
pula
tion
cove
red
by a
ll va
ccin
es in
clud
ed
in th
eir n
atio
nal
prog
ram
me
OCP
SDG
s
4.1 B
y 20
30, e
nsur
e th
at
all g
irls
and
boys
co
mpl
ete
free,
eq
uita
ble
and
qual
ity
prim
ary
and
seco
ndar
y ed
ucat
ion
lead
ing
to
rele
vant
and
effe
ctiv
e le
arni
ng o
utco
mes
4.1.1
Pro
porti
on o
f ch
ildre
n an
d yo
ung
peop
le (a
) in
grad
es 2
/3; (
b) a
t th
e en
d of
prim
ary;
an
d (c
) at t
he e
nd o
f lo
wer
sec
onda
ry
achi
evin
g at
leas
t a
min
imum
pro
ficie
ncy
leve
l in
(i) re
adin
g an
d (ii
) mat
hem
atic
s,
by s
ex
% o
f stu
dent
s co
mpl
etin
g se
cond
ary
educ
atio
n: s
urvi
val
rate
% o
f chi
ldre
n ac
hiev
ing
8 G
CSEs
(a
ttain
men
t 8
scor
e) –
br
oken
dow
n by
are
as o
f de
priv
atio
n
Key
Stag
e 4:
At
tain
men
t 8 -
Redu
ce th
e Po
ints
gap
be
twee
n th
e D
isad
vant
aged
and
Non
-D
isad
vant
aged
SD
Gs
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
inde
xes
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
inde
xes
Bris
tol C
ity
Coun
cil D
ata
Team
SDG
4:
Qua
lity
Educ
atio
n
SDG
3:
Goo
d H
ealth
an
d W
ellb
eing
26
4.2
By 2
030,
ens
ure
that
al
l girl
s an
d bo
ys h
ave
acce
ss to
qua
lity
early
ch
ildho
od
deve
lopm
ent,
care
and
pr
e-pr
imar
y ed
ucat
ion
so th
at th
ey a
re re
ady
for p
rimar
y ed
ucat
ion
4.2.
1 Pro
porti
on o
f ch
ildre
n un
der
5 ye
ars
of a
ge w
ho
are
deve
lopm
enta
lly o
n tra
ck in
hea
lth,
lear
ning
and
ps
ycho
soci
al w
ell-
bein
g, b
y se
x
4.2.
2 Pa
rtici
patio
n ra
te in
org
aniz
ed
lear
ning
(one
yea
r be
fore
the
offic
ial
prim
ary
entry
age
), by
sex
A re
duct
ion
in
the
gap
betw
een
child
ren
in th
e 30
% m
ost
depr
ived
ar
eas
achi
evin
g a
good
leve
l of
deve
lopm
ent
at E
arly
Yea
rs
foun
datio
n st
age
com
pare
d to
th
ose
not i
n
Diff
eren
ces
in s
choo
l re
adin
ess
betw
een
boys
and
gi
rls; f
or
child
ren
with
En
glis
h as
a
seco
nd
lang
uage
; an
d BM
E ch
ildre
n.SD
Gs/
Hap
py
City
SDG
s
Bris
tol C
ity
Coun
cil D
ata
Team
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads
4.3
By 2
030,
ens
ure
equa
l acc
ess
for a
ll w
omen
and
men
to
affo
rdab
le a
nd q
ualit
y te
chni
cal,
voca
tiona
l and
te
rtiar
y ed
ucat
ion,
in
clud
ing
univ
ersi
ty
num
ber o
f hig
her
educ
atio
n de
gree
s pe
r 100
000
po
pula
tion
% o
f sch
ool
leav
ers
iden
tifie
d as
not
in e
duca
tion
empl
oym
ent o
r tra
inin
g.
% o
f you
ng
peop
le
ente
ring
furth
er o
r hi
gher
ed
ucat
ion.
% o
f you
ng
peop
le
ente
ring
jobs
with
tra
inin
g
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
Inde
xes
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads
4.4
By 2
030,
su
bsta
ntia
lly in
crea
se
the
num
ber o
f you
th a
nd
adul
ts w
ho h
ave
rele
vant
ski
lls, i
nclu
ding
te
chni
cal a
nd v
ocat
iona
l sk
ills,
for e
mpl
oym
ent,
dece
nt jo
bs a
nd
entre
pren
eurs
hip
% o
f you
ng p
eopl
e ac
cess
ing
appr
entic
eshi
ps
% o
f you
ng
peop
le e
nter
ing
furth
er o
r hig
her
educ
atio
n.
% o
f adu
lts
with
out a
full
Leve
l 2
qual
ifica
tion
(equ
ival
ent t
o 5
GCS
Es)
% o
f you
ng
peop
le
ente
ring
jobs
with
tra
inin
g
% o
f adu
lts
who
hav
e pa
rtici
pate
d in
edu
catio
n or
trai
ning
in
the
last
four
w
eeks
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads
Hap
py C
ity4.
5 By
203
0, e
limin
ate
gend
er d
ispa
ritie
s in
ed
ucat
ion
and
ensu
re
equa
l acc
ess
to a
ll le
vels
of e
duca
tion
and
voca
tiona
l tra
inin
g fo
r th
e vu
lner
able
, in
clud
ing
pers
ons
with
di
sabi
litie
s, in
dige
nous
pe
ople
s an
d ch
ildre
n in
vu
lner
able
situ
atio
ns
4.2.
1 Pro
porti
on o
f ch
ildre
n un
der
5 ye
ars
of a
ge w
ho
are
deve
lopm
enta
lly o
n tra
ck in
hea
lth,
lear
ning
and
ps
ycho
soci
al w
ell-
bein
g, b
y se
x
4.2.
2 Pa
rtici
patio
n ra
te in
org
aniz
ed
lear
ning
(one
yea
r be
fore
the
offic
ial
prim
ary
entry
age
), by
sex
% o
f fem
ale
scho
ol-a
ged
popu
latio
n in
sc
hool
/% o
f m
ale
scho
ol-
aged
po
pula
tion
enro
lled
in
scho
ols
SDG
sSD
Gs
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
Inde
xes
SDG
4:
Qua
lity
Educ
atio
n
27
4.6
By 2
030,
ens
ure
that
al
l you
th a
nd a
su
bsta
ntia
l pro
porti
on
of a
dults
, bot
h m
en a
nd
wom
en, a
chie
ve li
tera
cy
and
num
erac
y
4.6.
1 Pro
porti
on o
f po
pula
tion
in a
gi
ven
age
grou
p ac
hiev
ing
at le
ast a
fix
ed le
vel o
f pr
ofic
ienc
y in
fu
nctio
nal (
a) li
tera
cy
and
(b) n
umer
acy
skill
s, b
y se
x
SDG
s/Ci
ty
Sust
aina
bilit
y Inde
xes/
Ha
ppy
City
4.7
By 2
030,
ens
ure
that
al
l lea
rner
s ac
quire
the
know
ledg
e an
d sk
ills
need
ed to
pro
mot
e su
stai
nabl
e de
velo
pmen
t, in
clud
ing,
am
ong
othe
rs, t
hrou
gh
educ
atio
n fo
r su
stai
nabl
e de
velo
pmen
t and
su
stai
nabl
e lif
esty
les,
hu
man
righ
ts, g
ende
r eq
ualit
y, p
rom
otio
n of
a
cultu
re o
f pea
ce a
nd
non-
viol
ence
, glo
bal
citiz
ensh
ip a
nd
appr
ecia
tion
of c
ultu
ral
dive
rsity
and
of
cultu
re’s
con
tribu
tion
to
sust
aina
ble
deve
lopm
ent
4.7.
1 Ext
ent t
o w
hich
(i)
glo
bal c
itize
nshi
p ed
ucat
ion
and
(ii)
educ
atio
n fo
r su
stai
nabl
e de
velo
pmen
t, in
clud
ing
gend
er
equa
lity
and
hum
an
right
s, a
re
mai
nstre
amed
at a
ll le
vels
in (a
) nat
iona
l ed
ucat
ion
polic
ies;
(b
) cur
ricul
a;
(c) t
each
er
educ
atio
n; a
nd (d
) st
uden
t ass
essm
ent
SDG
s
5.1 E
nd a
ll fo
rms
of
disc
rimin
atio
n ag
ains
t all
wom
en a
nd g
irls
ever
ywhe
re
5.5.
1 Pro
porti
on o
f se
ats
held
by
wom
en in
(a)
natio
nal p
arlia
men
ts
and
(b) l
ocal
go
vern
men
ts
5.5.
2 Pr
opor
tion
of w
omen
in
man
ager
ial
posi
tions
SDG
sSD
Gs
SDG
4:
Qua
lity
Educ
atio
n
SDG
5:
Gen
der
Equa
lity
28
5.2
Elim
inat
e al
l for
ms
of v
iole
nce
agai
nst a
ll w
omen
and
girl
s in
the
publ
ic a
nd p
rivat
e sp
here
s, in
clud
ing
traffi
ckin
g an
d se
xual
an
d ot
her t
ypes
of
expl
oita
tion
5.2.
1 Pro
porti
on o
f ev
er-p
artn
ered
w
omen
and
girl
s ag
ed 15
yea
rs a
nd
olde
r sub
ject
ed to
ph
ysic
al, s
exua
l or
psyc
holo
gica
l vi
olen
ce b
y a
curr
ent o
r for
mer
in
timat
e pa
rtner
in
the
prev
ious
12
mon
ths,
by
form
of
viol
ence
and
by
age
5.2.
2 Pr
opor
tion
of w
omen
and
gi
rls a
ged
15 y
ears
and
old
er
subj
ecte
d to
se
xual
vio
lenc
e by
pe
rson
s ot
her t
han
an in
timat
e pa
rtner
in
the
prev
ious
12
mon
ths,
by
age
and
plac
e of
oc
curr
ence
SDG
sSD
Gs
5.3
Elim
inat
e al
l har
mfu
l pr
actic
es, s
uch
as c
hild
, ea
rly a
nd fo
rced
m
arria
ge a
nd fe
mal
e ge
nita
l mut
ilatio
n
5.3.
1 Pro
porti
on o
f w
omen
age
d 20
–24
year
s w
ho
wer
e m
arrie
d or
in
a un
ion
befo
re a
ge
15 a
nd b
efor
e ag
e 18
5.3.
2 Pr
opor
tion
of g
irls
and
wom
en a
ged
15–4
9 ye
ars
who
ha
ve u
nder
gone
fe
mal
e ge
nita
l m
utila
tion/
cutti
ng,
by a
geSD
Gs
SDG
s/O
CP5.
4 Re
cogn
ize
and
valu
e un
paid
car
e an
d do
mes
tic w
ork
thro
ugh
the
prov
isio
n of
pub
lic
serv
ices
, inf
rast
ruct
ure
and
soci
al p
rote
ctio
n po
licie
s an
d th
e pr
omot
ion
of s
hare
d re
spon
sibi
lity
with
in th
e ho
useh
old
and
the
fam
ily a
s na
tiona
lly
appr
opria
te
5.4.
1 Pro
porti
on o
f tim
e sp
ent o
n un
paid
dom
estic
an
d ca
re w
ork,
by
sex,
age
and
lo
catio
nSD
Gs
5.5
Ensu
re w
omen
’s fu
ll an
d ef
fect
ive
parti
cipa
tion
and
equa
l op
portu
nitie
s fo
r le
ader
ship
at a
ll le
vels
of
dec
isio
n-m
akin
g in
po
litic
al, e
cono
mic
and
pu
blic
life
5.5.
1 Pro
porti
on o
f se
ats
held
by
wom
en in
(a)
natio
nal p
arlia
men
ts
and
(b) l
ocal
go
vern
men
ts
5.5.
2 Pr
opor
tion
of w
omen
in
man
ager
ial
posi
tions
SDG
sSD
Gs
SDG
5:
Gen
der
Equa
lity
29
5.6
Ensu
re u
nive
rsal
ac
cess
to s
exua
l and
re
prod
uctiv
e he
alth
and
re
prod
uctiv
e rig
hts
as
agre
ed in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
Prog
ram
me
of
Actio
n of
the
Inte
rnat
iona
l Co
nfer
ence
on
Popu
latio
n an
d D
evel
opm
ent a
nd th
e Be
ijing
Pla
tform
for
Actio
n an
d th
e ou
tcom
e do
cum
ents
of t
heir
revi
ew c
onfe
renc
es
Hav
e ne
w p
olic
ies
or in
itiat
ives
bee
n im
plem
ente
d in
Br
isto
l to
impr
ove
acce
ss to
sex
ual
and
repr
oduc
tive
heal
th c
are?
Alte
rnat
ive
Indi
cato
r 5.
c Ad
opt a
nd
stre
ngth
en s
ound
po
licie
s an
d en
forc
eabl
e le
gisl
atio
n fo
r the
pro
mot
ion
of
gend
er e
qual
ity a
nd th
e em
pow
erm
ent o
f all
wom
en a
nd g
irls
at a
ll le
vels
Hav
e ne
w p
olic
ies
or in
itiat
ives
bee
n im
plem
ente
d to
im
prov
e ge
nder
eq
ualit
y an
d th
e em
pow
erm
ent o
f all
wom
en a
nd g
irls
in
Bris
tol?
Alte
rnat
ive
Indi
cato
r 6.
3 By
203
0, im
prov
e w
ater
qua
lity
by
redu
cing
pol
lutio
n,
elim
inat
ing
dum
ping
and
m
inim
izin
g re
leas
e of
ha
zard
ous
chem
ical
s an
d m
ater
ials
, hal
ving
th
e pr
opor
tion
of
untre
ated
was
tew
ater
an
d su
bsta
ntia
lly
incr
easi
ng re
cycl
ing
and
safe
reus
e gl
obal
ly
6.3.
1 Pro
porti
on o
f w
aste
wat
er s
afel
y tre
ated
6.3.
2 Pr
opor
tion
of b
odie
s of
wat
er
with
goo
d am
bien
t w
ater
qua
lity
(Eco
logi
cal S
tatu
s of
Bris
tol W
ater
Ca
tchm
ent)
SDG
s/Ci
ty
Sust
aina
bilit
y In
dexe
s
SDG
s/O
ne
City
Pla
n Th
eme
Lead
s
SDG
5:
Gen
der
Equa
lity
SDG
6:
Clea
n W
ater
and
Sa
nita
tion
30
6.4
By 2
030,
su
bsta
ntia
lly in
crea
se
wat
er-u
se e
ffici
ency
ac
ross
all
sect
ors
and
ensu
re s
usta
inab
le
with
draw
als
and
supp
ly
of fr
eshw
ater
to
addr
ess
wat
er s
carc
ity
and
subs
tant
ially
redu
ce
the
num
ber o
f peo
ple
suffe
ring
from
wat
er
scar
city
6.4.
1 Cha
nge
in
wat
er-u
se e
ffici
ency
ov
er ti
me
6.4.
2 Le
vel o
f w
ater
stre
ss:
fresh
wat
er
with
draw
al a
s a
prop
ortio
n of
av
aila
ble
fresh
wat
er
reso
urce
sSD
Gs
SDG
s7.
1 By
2030
, ens
ure
univ
ersa
l acc
ess
to
affo
rdab
le, r
elia
ble
and
mod
ern
ener
gy
serv
ices
7.1.2
Pro
porti
on o
f po
pula
tion
with
pr
imar
y re
lianc
e on
cl
ean
fuel
s an
d te
chno
logy
Tota
l Ele
ctric
al
ener
gy u
se p
er
capi
ta (r
esid
enta
l +
city
wid
e)
SDG
s
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
Inde
xes
7.2
By 2
030,
incr
ease
su
bsta
ntia
lly th
e sh
are
of re
new
able
ene
rgy
in
the
glob
al e
nerg
y m
ix
7.2.
1 Ren
ewab
le
ener
gy s
hare
in th
e to
tal f
inal
ene
rgy
cons
umpt
ion
SDG
s/Ci
ty
Sust
aina
bilit
y In
dexe
s7.
3 By
203
0, d
oubl
e th
e gl
obal
rate
of
impr
ovem
ent i
n en
ergy
ef
ficie
ncy
7.3.
1 Ene
rgy
inte
nsity
mea
sure
d in
term
s of
prim
ary
ener
gy a
nd G
DP
SDG
s8.
1 Sus
tain
per
cap
ita
econ
omic
gro
wth
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith
natio
nal c
ircum
stan
ces
and,
in p
artic
ular
, at
leas
t 7 p
er c
ent g
ross
do
mes
tic p
rodu
ct
grow
th p
er a
nnum
in th
e le
ast d
evel
oped
co
untri
esG
VA
GVA
gro
wth
rate
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads/
SD
Gs
Bris
tol C
ity
Coun
cil D
ata
Team
/ SD
Gs
SDG
7:
Affo
rdab
le
and
Clea
n En
ergy
SDG
8:
Dec
ent
wor
k an
d Ec
onom
ic
Gro
wth
SDG
6:
Clea
n W
ater
and
Sa
nita
tion
31
8.2
Achi
eve
high
er
leve
ls o
f eco
nom
ic
prod
uctiv
ity th
roug
h di
vers
ifica
tion,
te
chno
logi
cal
upgr
adin
g an
d in
nova
tion,
incl
udin
g th
roug
h a
focu
s on
hig
h-va
lue
adde
d an
d la
bour
-in
tens
ive
sect
ors
8.2.
1 Ann
ual g
row
th
rate
of r
eal G
VA p
er
empl
oyed
per
son
SDG
s
8.3
Prom
ote
deve
lopm
ent-o
rient
ed
polic
ies
that
sup
port
prod
uctiv
e ac
tiviti
es,
dece
nt jo
b cr
eatio
n,
entre
pren
eurs
hip,
cr
eativ
ity a
nd
inno
vatio
n, a
nd
enco
urag
e th
e fo
rmal
izat
ion
and
grow
th o
f mic
ro-,
smal
l- an
d m
ediu
m-s
ized
en
terp
rises
, inc
ludi
ng
thro
ugh
acce
ss to
fin
anci
al s
ervi
ces
City
’s
unem
ploy
men
t rat
e
Num
ber o
f bu
sine
sses
per
10
0 00
0 po
pula
tion
Incr
ease
d nu
mbe
r of
busi
ness
sta
rt-up
s in
de
priv
ed
area
s
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
Inde
xes
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
Inde
xes
Bris
tol C
ity
Coun
cil D
ata
Team
SDG
8:
Dec
ent
wor
k an
d Ec
onom
ic
Gro
wth
32
8.4
Impr
ove
prog
ress
ivel
y, th
roug
h 20
30, g
loba
l res
ourc
e ef
ficie
ncy
in
cons
umpt
ion
and
prod
uctio
n an
d en
deav
our t
o de
coup
le
econ
omic
gro
wth
from
en
viro
nmen
tal
degr
adat
ion,
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith th
e 10-Y
ear F
ram
ewor
k of
Pr
ogra
mm
es o
n Su
stai
nabl
e Co
nsum
ptio
n an
d Pr
oduc
tion,
with
de
velo
ped
coun
tries
ta
king
the
lead
8.4.
1 Mat
eria
l fo
otpr
int,
mat
eria
l fo
otpr
int p
er c
apita
, an
d m
ater
ial
foot
prin
t per
GD
PSD
Gs
8.5
By 2
030,
ach
ieve
fu
ll an
d pr
oduc
tive
empl
oym
ent a
nd d
ecen
t w
ork
for a
ll w
omen
and
m
en, i
nclu
ding
for
youn
g pe
ople
and
pe
rson
s w
ith
disa
bilit
ies,
and
equ
al
pay
for w
ork
of e
qual
va
lue
8.5.
1 Ave
rage
ho
urly
ear
ning
s of
fe
mal
e an
d m
ale
empl
oyee
s, b
y oc
cupa
tion,
age
and
pe
rson
s w
ith
disa
bilit
ies
8.5.
2 U
nem
ploy
men
t ra
te, b
y se
x, a
ge
and
pers
ons
with
di
sabi
litie
s
Diff
eren
ce
betw
een
high
pe
rform
ing
and
poor
ly
perfo
rmin
g ar
eas
in th
e nu
mbe
r of
unem
ploy
ed
peop
leSD
Gs
SDG
s
Bris
tol C
ity
Coun
cil
Corp
orat
e St
rate
gy
8.6
By 2
020,
su
bsta
ntia
lly re
duce
the
prop
ortio
n of
you
th n
ot
in e
mpl
oym
ent,
educ
atio
n or
trai
ning
8.6.
1 Pro
porti
on o
f yo
uth
(age
d 15
–24
year
s) n
ot in
ed
ucat
ion,
em
ploy
men
t or
train
ing
Yout
h un
empl
oym
ent
rate
% o
f 17
- 21
year
old
car
e le
aver
s in
EET
% o
f you
ng
peop
le o
f ac
adem
ic
age
16 to
17
year
s w
ho
are
NEE
T &
dest
inat
ion
unkn
own
prop
ortio
n of
you
ng
peop
le w
ho
have
ex
perie
nce
of
wor
k/ap
pre
ntic
eshi
p by
sc
hool
age
16
.SD
Gs
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
Inde
xes
Bris
tol C
ity
Coun
cil D
ata
Team
Bris
tol C
ity
Coun
cil D
ata
Team
Bris
tol C
ity
Coun
cil
Corp
orat
e St
rate
gy
SDG
8:
Dec
ent
wor
k an
d Ec
onom
ic
Gro
wth
33
8.7
Take
imm
edia
te a
nd
effe
ctiv
e m
easu
res
to
erad
icat
e fo
rced
la
bour
, end
mod
ern
slav
ery
and
hum
an
traffi
ckin
g an
d se
cure
th
e pr
ohib
ition
and
el
imin
atio
n of
the
wor
st
form
s of
chi
ld la
bour
, in
clud
ing
recr
uitm
ent
and
use
of c
hild
so
ldie
rs, a
nd b
y 20
25
end
child
labo
ur in
all
its
form
s
8.7.
1 Pro
porti
on a
nd
num
ber o
f chi
ldre
n ag
ed 5
–17
year
s en
gage
d in
chi
ld
labo
ur, b
y se
x an
d ag
e
Num
ber o
f Bris
tol
base
d co
mpa
nies
re
porti
ng o
n m
oder
n sl
aver
ySD
Gs
Tisc
repo
rt
8.8
Prot
ect l
abou
r rig
hts
and
prom
ote
safe
an
d se
cure
wor
king
en
viro
nmen
ts fo
r all
wor
kers
, inc
ludi
ng
mig
rant
wor
kers
, in
parti
cula
r wom
en
mig
rant
s, a
nd th
ose
in
prec
ario
us e
mpl
oym
ent
8.8.
1 Fre
quen
cy
rate
s of
fata
l and
no
n-fa
tal
occu
patio
nal
inju
ries,
by
sex
and
mig
rant
sta
tus
SDG
s8.
9 By
203
0, d
evis
e an
d im
plem
ent p
olic
ies
to p
rom
ote
sust
aina
ble
tour
ism
that
cre
ates
jo
bs a
nd p
rom
otes
lo
cal c
ultu
re a
nd
prod
ucts
8.9.
2 Pr
opor
tion
of
jobs
in s
usta
inab
le
tour
ism
indu
strie
s ou
t of t
otal
tour
ism
jo
bs
8.9.
1 Tou
rism
di
rect
GD
P as
a
prop
ortio
n of
tota
l G
DP
and
in g
row
th
rate
SDG
sSD
Gs
9.1 D
evel
op q
ualit
y,
relia
ble,
sus
tain
able
an
d re
silie
nt
infra
stru
ctur
e, in
clud
ing
regi
onal
and
tra
nsbo
rder
in
frast
ruct
ure,
to
supp
ort e
cono
mic
de
velo
pmen
t and
hu
man
wel
l-bei
ng, w
ith a
fo
cus
on a
fford
able
and
eq
uita
ble
acce
ss fo
r all
9.1.2
Pas
seng
er
and
freig
ht v
olum
es,
by m
ode
of
trans
port
Km o
f hig
h ca
paci
ty p
ublic
tra
nspo
rt sy
stem
pe
r 100
000
po
pula
tion
Km o
f lig
ht
pass
enge
r tra
nspo
rt pu
blic
tra
nspo
rt sy
stem
s pe
r 10
0 00
0 po
pula
tion
SDG
s
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
inde
xes
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
Inde
xes
SDG
8:
Dec
ent
wor
k an
d Ec
onom
ic
Gro
wth
SDG
9:
Indu
stry
, In
nova
tion
and
Infr
astr
uct
ure
34
9.2
Prom
ote
incl
usiv
e an
d su
stai
nabl
e in
dust
rializ
atio
n an
d, b
y 20
30, s
igni
fican
tly ra
ise
indu
stry
’s s
hare
of
empl
oym
ent a
nd g
ross
do
mes
tic p
rodu
ct, i
n lin
e w
ith n
atio
nal
circ
umst
ance
s, a
nd
doub
le it
s sh
are
in le
ast
deve
lope
d co
untri
es
9.2.
1 Man
ufac
turin
g va
lue
adde
d as
a
prop
ortio
n of
GD
P an
d pe
r cap
ita
9.2.
2 M
anuf
actu
ring
empl
oym
ent a
s a
prop
ortio
n of
tota
l em
ploy
men
tSD
Gs
SDG
s
9.4
By 2
030,
upg
rade
in
frast
ruct
ure
and
retro
fit in
dust
ries
to
mak
e th
em s
usta
inab
le,
with
incr
ease
d re
sour
ce-u
se e
ffici
ency
an
d gr
eate
r ado
ptio
n of
cl
ean
and
envi
ronm
enta
lly s
ound
te
chno
logi
es a
nd
indu
stria
l pro
cess
es,
with
all
coun
tries
taki
ng
actio
n in
acc
orda
nce
with
thei
r res
pect
ive
capa
bilit
ies
9.4.
1 CO
2 em
issi
on
per u
nit o
f val
ue
adde
dSD
Gs
9.c
Sign
ifica
ntly
in
crea
se a
cces
s to
in
form
atio
n an
d co
mm
unic
atio
ns
tech
nolo
gy a
nd s
trive
to
prov
ide
univ
ersa
l and
af
ford
able
acc
ess
to th
e In
tern
et in
leas
t de
velo
ped
coun
tries
by
202
0
Num
ber o
f int
erne
t co
nnec
tions
per
10
0 00
0 po
pula
tion
% li
ving
in th
e m
ost
depr
ived
are
as
who
hav
e ac
cess
to
the
inte
rnet
at
hom
e vi
a ho
me
broa
dban
d,
mob
ile p
hone
or
mob
ile b
road
band
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
Inde
xes
Bris
tol C
ity
Coun
cil D
ata
Team
SDG
9:
Indu
stry
, In
nova
tion
and
Infr
astr
uct
ure
35
10.1
By 2
030,
pr
ogre
ssiv
ely
achi
eve
and
sust
ain
inco
me
grow
th o
f the
bot
tom
40
per
cen
t of t
he
popu
latio
n at
a ra
te
high
er th
an th
e na
tiona
l av
erag
eG
ini C
oeffi
cien
t
80/2
0 pe
rcen
tile
ratio
of w
eekl
y ea
rnin
gs (a
big
ger
ratio
mea
ns a
bi
gger
diff
eren
ce
betw
een
perc
entil
es a
nd
thus
mor
e in
equa
lity)
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity In
dexe
s/Br
isto
l City
Co
unci
l Dat
a te
am/O
ne
City
Pla
n Th
eme
Lead
sH
appy
City
10
.2 B
y 20
30, e
mpo
wer
an
d pr
omot
e th
e so
cial
, ec
onom
ic a
nd p
oliti
cal
incl
usio
n of
all,
irr
espe
ctiv
e of
age
, se
x, d
isab
ility
, rac
e,
ethn
icity
, orig
in, r
elig
ion
or e
cono
mic
or o
ther
st
atus
10.2
.1 Pr
opor
tion
of
peop
le li
ving
be
low
50
per c
ent
of m
edia
n in
com
e,
by s
ex
10.2
.1 Pr
opor
tion
of p
eopl
e liv
ing
belo
w 5
0 pe
r cen
t of
med
ian
inco
me,
by
age
10.2
.1 Pr
opor
tion
of
peop
le li
ving
be
low
50
per
cen
t of
med
ian
inco
me,
by
pers
ons
with
di
sabi
litie
s
10.2
.1 Pr
opor
tion
of p
eopl
e liv
ing
belo
w
50 p
er c
ent
of m
edia
n in
com
e, b
y et
hnic
itySD
Gs
SDG
sSD
Gs
SDG
s
10.3
Ens
ure
equa
l op
portu
nity
and
redu
ce
ineq
ualit
ies
of o
utco
me,
in
clud
ing
by e
limin
atin
g di
scrim
inat
ory
law
s,
polic
ies
and
prac
tices
an
d pr
omot
ing
appr
opria
te le
gisl
atio
n,
polic
ies
and
actio
n in
th
is re
gard
10.3
.1 Pr
opor
tion
of
popu
latio
n re
porti
ng h
avin
g pe
rson
ally
felt
disc
rimin
ated
ag
ains
t or h
aras
sed
in th
e pr
evio
us 12
m
onth
s on
the
basi
s of
a g
roun
d of
di
scrim
inat
ion
proh
ibite
d un
der
inte
rnat
iona
l hum
an
right
s la
wRa
ce p
ay g
apG
ende
r pay
ga
p SD
Gs
Bris
tol C
ity
Coun
cil
Busi
ness
st
rate
gy
Bris
tol C
ity
Coun
cil
Busi
ness
st
rate
gy10
.4 A
dopt
pol
icie
s,
espe
cial
ly fi
scal
, wag
e an
d so
cial
pro
tect
ion
polic
ies,
and
pr
ogre
ssiv
ely
achi
eve
grea
ter e
qual
ity
% o
f ful
l-tim
e em
ploy
ees
with
low
re
lativ
e in
com
e (le
ss th
an 7
0% o
f UK
med
ian
wag
e)H
appy
City
SDG
10:
Redu
ced
Ineq
ualit
ies
36
11.1
By 2
030,
ens
ure
acce
ss fo
r all
to
adeq
uate
, saf
e an
d af
ford
able
hou
sing
and
ba
sic
serv
ices
and
up
grad
e sl
ums
11.1.
1 Pro
porti
on o
f ur
ban
popu
latio
n liv
ing
in s
lum
s,
info
rmal
set
tlem
ents
or
inad
equa
te
hous
ing
Soci
al a
nd p
rivat
e ho
usin
g in
poo
r co
nditi
on
(pro
porti
on)
Num
ber (
per
100
hous
ehol
ds)
acce
pted
as
bein
g ho
mel
ess
and
in p
riorit
y ne
ed u
nder
th
e ho
mel
essn
ess
prov
isio
ns o
f th
e 19
96
Hou
sing
Act
Ove
rall
satis
fact
ion
with
you
r cu
rren
t ac
com
mod
atio
n - b
y te
nure
SD
Gs
Hap
py C
ityH
appy
City
Bris
tol C
ity
Coun
cil D
ata
Team
11.2
By
2030
, pro
vide
ac
cess
to s
afe,
af
ford
able
, acc
essi
ble
and
sust
aina
ble
trans
port
syst
ems
for
all,
impr
ovin
g ro
ad
safe
ty, n
otab
ly b
y ex
pand
ing
publ
ic
trans
port,
with
spe
cial
at
tent
ion
to th
e ne
eds
of
thos
e in
vul
nera
ble
situ
atio
ns, w
omen
, ch
ildre
n, p
erso
ns w
ith
disa
bilit
ies
and
olde
r pe
rson
s
11.2
.1 Pr
opor
tion
of
popu
latio
n th
at h
as
conv
enie
nt a
cces
s to
pub
lic tr
ansp
ort,
by s
ex, a
ge a
nd
pers
ons
with
di
sabi
litie
s
Mod
al s
plit,
focu
s on
sus
tain
able
and
ac
tive
trans
port
Km o
f lig
ht
pass
enge
r tra
nspo
rt pu
blic
tra
nspo
rt sy
stem
s pe
r 10
0 00
0 po
pula
tion
Annu
al
num
ber o
f pu
blic
tra
nspo
rt tri
ps p
er
capi
taSD
Gs
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
inde
xes
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
Inde
xes
11.3
By
2030
, enh
ance
in
clus
ive
and
sust
aina
ble
urba
niza
tion
and
capa
city
for
parti
cipa
tory
, int
egra
ted
and
sust
aina
ble
hum
an
settl
emen
t pla
nnin
g an
d m
anag
emen
t in
all
coun
tries
11.3
.1 Ra
tio o
f lan
d co
nsum
ptio
n ra
te to
po
pula
tion
grow
th
rate
Vote
r par
ticip
atio
n in
last
mun
icip
al
elec
tion
(as
% o
f el
igib
le v
oter
s)
Wom
en a
s a
%
of to
tal
elec
ted
to c
ity-
leve
l offi
ceSD
Gs
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
inde
xes
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
Inde
xes
SDG
11:
Sust
aina
ble
Citie
s an
d Co
mm
unit
ies
37
11.4
Stre
ngth
en e
fforts
to
pro
tect
and
sa
fegu
ard
the
wor
ld’s
cu
ltura
l and
nat
ural
he
ritag
e
11.4
.1 To
tal
expe
nditu
re (p
ublic
an
d pr
ivat
e) p
er
capi
ta s
pent
on
the
pres
erva
tion,
pr
otec
tion
and
cons
erva
tion
of a
ll cu
ltura
l and
nat
ural
he
ritag
e, b
y ty
pe o
f he
ritag
e (c
ultu
ral,
natu
ral,
mix
ed a
nd
Wor
ld H
erita
ge
Cent
re d
esig
natio
n),
leve
l of g
over
nmen
t (n
atio
nal,
regi
onal
an
d lo
cal/m
unic
ipal
), ty
pe o
f exp
endi
ture
(o
pera
ting
expe
nditu
re/in
vest
men
t) an
d ty
pe o
f pr
ivat
e fu
ndin
g (d
onat
ions
in k
ind,
pr
ivat
e no
n-pr
ofit
sect
or a
nd
spon
sors
hip)
Num
ber o
f tou
rists
vi
sitin
g Br
isto
l SD
Gs
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads
11.5
By
2030
, si
gnifi
cant
ly re
duce
the
num
ber o
f dea
ths
and
the
num
ber o
f peo
ple
affe
cted
and
su
bsta
ntia
lly d
ecre
ase
the
dire
ct e
cono
mic
lo
sses
rela
tive
to
glob
al g
ross
dom
estic
pr
oduc
t cau
sed
by
disa
ster
s, in
clud
ing
wat
er-re
late
d di
sast
ers,
w
ith a
focu
s on
pr
otec
ting
the
poor
and
pe
ople
in v
ulne
rabl
e si
tuat
ions
11.5
.2 D
irect
ec
onom
ic lo
ss in
re
latio
n to
glo
bal
GD
P, d
amag
e to
cr
itica
l inf
rast
ruct
ure
and
num
ber o
f di
srup
tions
to b
asic
se
rvic
es, a
ttrib
uted
to
dis
aste
rs
Num
ber o
f di
sast
er re
late
d de
aths
per
100
000
popu
latio
nSD
Gs
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
inde
xes
SDG
11:
Sust
aina
ble
Citie
s an
d Co
mm
unit
ies
38
11.6
By
2030
, red
uce
the
adve
rse
per c
apita
en
viro
nmen
tal i
mpa
ct o
f ci
ties,
incl
udin
g by
pa
ying
spe
cial
atte
ntio
n to
air
qual
ity a
nd
mun
icip
al a
nd o
ther
w
aste
man
agem
ent
11.6
.1 Pr
opor
tion
of
urba
n so
lid w
aste
re
gula
rly c
olle
cted
an
d w
ith a
dequ
ate
final
dis
char
ge o
ut
of to
tal u
rban
sol
id
was
te g
ener
ated
, by
citi
es
11.6
.2 A
nnua
l mea
n le
vels
of f
ine
parti
cula
te m
atte
r (e
.g. P
M2.
5 an
d PM
10) i
n ci
ties
(pop
ulat
ion
wei
ghte
d)
Nitr
ogen
D
ioxi
de (N
O2)
co
ncen
tratio
n
Sulp
hur
Dio
xide
(S
O2)
co
ncen
tratio
n
Ozo
ne (O
3)
conc
entra
tion
SDG
sSD
Gs
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
Inde
xes
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
Inde
xes
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
Inde
xes
11.7
By
2030
, pro
vide
un
iver
sal a
cces
s to
sa
fe, i
nclu
sive
and
ac
cess
ible
, gre
en a
nd
publ
ic s
pace
s, in
pa
rticu
lar f
or w
omen
an
d ch
ildre
n, o
lder
pe
rson
s an
d pe
rson
s w
ith d
isab
ilitie
s
% o
f res
iden
ts
visi
ting
a pa
rk o
r op
en s
pace
at l
east
on
ce a
wee
k
Gre
en a
rea
(hec
tare
s) p
er 10
0 00
0 po
pula
tion
Bris
tol C
ity
Coun
cil D
ata
Team
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
inde
xes
12.2
By
2030
, ach
ieve
th
e su
stai
nabl
e m
anag
emen
t and
ef
ficie
nt u
se o
f nat
ural
re
sour
ces
12.2
.1 M
ater
ial
foot
prin
t, m
ater
ial
foot
prin
t per
cap
ita,
and
mat
eria
l fo
otpr
int p
er G
DP
12.2
.2 D
omes
tic
mat
eria
l co
nsum
ptio
n,
dom
estic
mat
eria
l co
nsum
ptio
n pe
r ca
pita
, and
do
mes
tic m
ater
ial
cons
umpt
ion
per
GD
PSD
Gs
SDG
s12
.3 B
y 20
30, h
alve
per
ca
pita
glo
bal f
ood
was
te a
t the
reta
il an
d co
nsum
er le
vels
and
re
duce
food
loss
es
alon
g pr
oduc
tion
and
supp
ly c
hain
s, in
clud
ing
post
-har
vest
loss
esFo
od w
aste
per
ca
pita
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads
SDG
11:
Sust
aina
ble
Citie
s an
d Co
mm
unit
ies
SDG
12:
Resp
onsi
ble
Pr
oduc
tion
and
Cons
umpt
ion
39
12.4
By
2020
, ach
ieve
th
e en
viro
nmen
tally
so
und
man
agem
ent o
f ch
emic
als
and
all
was
tes
thro
ugho
ut th
eir
life
cycl
e, in
acc
orda
nce
with
agr
eed
inte
rnat
iona
l fra
mew
orks
, and
si
gnifi
cant
ly re
duce
th
eir r
elea
se to
air,
w
ater
and
soi
l in
orde
r to
min
imiz
e th
eir
adve
rse
impa
cts
on
hum
an h
ealth
and
the
envi
ronm
ent
12.4
.2 H
azar
dous
w
aste
gen
erat
ed
per c
apita
and
pr
opor
tion
of
haza
rdou
s w
aste
tre
ated
, by
type
of
treat
men
tSD
Gs
12.5
By
2030
, su
bsta
ntia
lly re
duce
w
aste
gen
erat
ion
thro
ugh
prev
entio
n,
redu
ctio
n, re
cycl
ing
and
reus
eRe
cycl
ing
rate
sTo
tal w
aste
pr
oduc
ed
Tota
l was
te
reus
ed
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads
12.6
Enc
oura
ge
com
pani
es, e
spec
ially
la
rge
and
trans
natio
nal
com
pani
es, t
o ad
opt
sust
aina
ble
prac
tices
an
d to
inte
grat
e su
stai
nabi
lity
info
rmat
ion
into
thei
r rep
ortin
g cy
cle
Num
ber o
f co
mpa
nies
ad
optin
g O
CP/S
DG
s
12.6
.1 N
umbe
r of
com
pani
es
publ
ishi
ng
sust
aina
bilit
y re
ports
Tisc
repo
rtSD
Gs
12.7
Pro
mot
e pu
blic
pr
ocur
emen
t pra
ctic
es
that
are
sus
tain
able
, in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith
natio
nal p
olic
ies
and
prio
ritie
sIm
plem
enta
tion
fo
Soci
al V
alue
Por
tal
SVP
SDG
12:
Resp
onsi
ble
Pr
oduc
tion
and
Cons
umpt
ion
40
12.8
By
2030
, ens
ure
that
peo
ple
ever
ywhe
re h
ave
the
rele
vant
info
rmat
ion
and
awar
enes
s fo
r su
stai
nabl
e de
velo
pmen
t and
lif
esty
les
in h
arm
ony
with
nat
ure
4.7.
1 Ext
ent t
o w
hich
(i)
glo
bal c
itize
nshi
p ed
ucat
ion
and
(ii)
educ
atio
n fo
r su
stai
nabl
e de
velo
pmen
t, in
clud
ing
gend
er
equa
lity
and
hum
an
right
s, a
re
mai
nstre
amed
at a
ll le
vels
in (a
) nat
iona
l ed
ucat
ion
polic
ies;
(b
) cur
ricul
a;
(c) t
each
er
educ
atio
n; a
nd (d
) st
uden
t ass
essm
ent
SDG
s
13.1
Stre
ngth
en
resi
lienc
e an
d ad
aptiv
e ca
paci
ty to
clim
ate-
rela
ted
haza
rds
and
natu
ral d
isas
ters
in a
ll co
untri
es
13.1.
1 Num
ber o
f de
aths
, mis
sing
pe
rson
s an
d di
rect
ly a
ffect
ed
pers
ons
attri
bute
d to
dis
aste
rs p
er
100,
000
popu
latio
nSD
Gs
13.2
Inte
grat
e cl
imat
e ch
ange
mea
sure
s in
to
(nat
iona
l) po
licie
s,
stra
tegi
es a
nd p
lann
ing
Hav
e ne
w c
limat
e ch
ange
pol
icie
s or
in
itiat
ives
bee
n in
trodu
ced
by c
ity
stak
ehol
ders
?Al
tern
ativ
e In
dica
tor
SDG
13:
Clim
ate
Actio
n
SDG
12:
Resp
onsi
ble
Pr
oduc
tion
and
Cons
umpt
ion
41
13.3
Impr
ove
educ
atio
n,
awar
enes
s-ra
isin
g an
d hu
man
and
inst
itutio
nal
capa
city
on
clim
ate
chan
ge m
itiga
tion,
ad
apta
tion,
impa
ct
redu
ctio
n an
d ea
rly
war
ning
4.7.
1 Ext
ent t
o w
hich
(i)
glo
bal c
itize
nshi
p ed
ucat
ion
and
(ii)
educ
atio
n fo
r su
stai
nabl
e de
velo
pmen
t, in
clud
ing
gend
er
equa
lity
and
hum
an
right
s, a
re
mai
nstre
amed
at a
ll le
vels
in (a
) nat
iona
l ed
ucat
ion
polic
ies;
(b
) cur
ricul
a;
(c) t
each
er
educ
atio
n; a
nd (d
) st
uden
t ass
essm
ent
SDG
sSD
G 14
: Li
fe U
nder
W
ater
14.1
By 2
025,
pre
vent
an
d si
gnifi
cant
ly re
duce
m
arin
e po
llutio
n of
all
kind
s, in
par
ticul
ar fr
om
land
-bas
ed a
ctiv
ities
, in
clud
ing
mar
ine
debr
is
and
nutri
ent p
ollu
tion
14.1.
1 Ind
ex o
f co
asta
l eu
troph
icat
ion
and
float
ing
plas
tic
debr
is d
ensi
ty
Ecol
ogic
al s
tatu
s of
Bris
tol’s
wat
er
catc
hmen
tSD
Gs
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads
15.1
By 2
020,
ens
ure
the
cons
erva
tion,
re
stor
atio
n an
d su
stai
nabl
e us
e of
te
rres
trial
and
inla
nd
fresh
wat
er e
cosy
stem
s an
d th
eir s
ervi
ces,
in
parti
cula
r for
ests
, w
etla
nds,
mou
ntai
ns a
nd
dryl
ands
, in
line
with
ob
ligat
ions
und
er
inte
rnat
iona
l ag
reem
ents
Ecol
ogic
al s
tatu
s of
Br
isto
l’s w
ater
ca
tchm
ent
Tree
can
opy
cove
r in
Bris
tol
Gre
en a
rea
(hec
tare
s) p
er
100
000
popu
latio
n
Net
bi
odiv
ersi
ty
incr
ease
One
City
Pl
an T
hem
e Le
ads
Bris
tol C
ity
Coun
cil D
ata
Team
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
Inde
xes
Hap
py C
ity
15.9
By
2020
, int
egra
te
ecos
yste
m a
nd
biod
iver
sity
val
ues
into
na
tiona
l and
loca
l pl
anni
ng, d
evel
opm
ent
proc
esse
s, p
over
ty
redu
ctio
n st
rate
gies
an
d ac
coun
ts
Hav
e ne
w
ecos
yste
m a
nd
biod
iver
sity
val
ues
been
inte
grat
ed
into
pla
nnin
g pr
oces
ses
or
deve
lopm
ent
initi
ativ
es in
Bris
tol?
Alte
rnat
ive
Indi
cato
r
SDG
13:
Clim
ate
Actio
n
SDG
15:
Life
on
Land
42
16.1
Sign
ifica
ntly
redu
ce
all f
orm
s of
vio
lenc
e an
d re
late
d de
ath
rate
s ev
eryw
here
16.1.
4 Pr
opor
tion
of
popu
latio
n th
at fe
el
safe
wal
king
alo
ne
arou
nd th
e ar
ea
they
live
16.1.
3 Pr
opor
tion
of p
opul
atio
n su
bjec
ted
to
phys
ical
, ps
ycho
logi
cal o
r se
xual
vio
lenc
e in
th
e pr
evio
us
12 m
onth
sSD
Gs
SDG
s
16.2
End
abu
se,
expl
oita
tion,
traf
ficki
ng
and
all f
orm
s of
vi
olen
ce a
gain
st a
nd
tortu
re o
f chi
ldre
n
16.2
.1 Pr
opor
tion
of
child
ren
aged
1–
17 y
ears
who
ex
perie
nced
any
ph
ysic
al p
unis
hmen
t an
d/or
ps
ycho
logi
cal
aggr
essi
on b
y ca
regi
vers
in th
e pa
st m
onth
16.2
.2 N
umbe
r of
vict
ims
of h
uman
tra
ffick
ing
per
100,
000
popu
latio
n, b
y se
x, a
ge a
nd fo
rm
of e
xplo
itatio
n
16.2
.3
Prop
ortio
n of
yo
ung
wom
en
and
men
age
d 18
–29
year
s w
ho
expe
rienc
ed
sexu
al
viol
ence
by
age
18SD
Gs
SDG
sSD
Gs
16.4
By
2030
, si
gnifi
cant
ly re
duce
ill
icit
finan
cial
and
arm
s flo
ws,
stre
ngth
en th
e re
cove
ry a
nd re
turn
of
stol
en a
sset
s an
d co
mba
t all
form
s of
or
gani
zed
crim
eCr
ime
rate
Viol
ent C
rime
Rate
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
Inde
xes
City
Su
stai
nabi
lity
Inde
xes
16.6
Dev
elop
effe
ctiv
e,
acco
unta
ble
and
trans
pare
nt in
stitu
tions
at
all
leve
ls
16.6
.2 P
ropo
rtion
of
popu
latio
n sa
tisfie
d w
ith th
eir l
ast
expe
rienc
e of
pu
blic
ser
vice
sSD
Gs
16.7
Ens
ure
resp
onsi
ve,
incl
usiv
e, p
artic
ipat
ory
and
repr
esen
tativ
e de
cisi
on-m
akin
g at
all
leve
ls
16.7
.1 Pr
opor
tions
of
pos
ition
s (b
y se
x,
age,
per
sons
with
di
sabi
litie
s an
d po
pula
tion
grou
ps)
in p
ublic
inst
itutio
ns
(nat
iona
l and
loca
l le
gisl
atur
es, p
ublic
se
rvic
e, a
nd
judi
ciar
y) c
ompa
red
to n
atio
nal
dist
ribut
ions
16.7
.2 P
ropo
rtion
of
pop
ulat
ion
who
be
lieve
dec
isio
n-m
akin
g is
incl
usiv
e an
d re
spon
sive
, by
sex
, age
, di
sabi
lity
and
popu
latio
n gr
oup
SDG
sSD
Gs
SDG
16:
Peac
e Ju
stic
e an
d St
rong
In
stitu
tion
s
SDG
17:
Part
ners
hips
for t
he
Goa
ls
17.17
Enc
oura
ge a
nd
prom
ote
effe
ctiv
e pu
blic
, pub
lic-p
rivat
e an
d ci
vil s
ocie
ty
partn
ersh
ips,
bui
ldin
g on
the
expe
rienc
e an
d re
sour
cing
stra
tegi
es o
f pa
rtner
ship
s
Hav
e ne
w p
ublic
, pu
blic
-priv
ate
and
civi
l soc
iety
pa
rtner
ship
s fo
rmed
in B
risto
l to
enha
nce
capa
city
to
achi
eve
loca
l su
stai
nabi
lity
goal
s?Al
tern
ativ
e In
dica
tor
43
ENDNOTES1. Bristol City Council. 2019. “State of Bristol: Key Facts 2018-19.”
https://www.bristol.gov.uk/documents/20182/32947/State+of+Bris-
tol+-+Key+Facts+2018-19.PDF/263d5f0f-763e-9553-467d-c9704f307d7c.
2. BBC News. 2017. “Bristol Named Best Place to Live in Britain in 2017.”
March 19, 2017. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-39320118.
3. Earl, Grace. 2017. “Bristol is now officially Europe’s coolest city and in the
Top 20 in the world.” The Bristol Post. December 5, 2017. https://www.bris-
tolpost.co.uk/whats-on/whats-on-news/bristol-coolest-city-in-world-878497.
4. Bristol City Council, 2018.
5. Bristol City Office. 2019. “One City Plan.” Bristol. https://www.bristolonec-
ity.com/one-city-plan.
6. Greene, Solomon and Brady Meixell. 2017. “Hacking the Sustainable
Development Goals: Can US Cities Measure Up?” http://www.urban.org/
sites/default/files/publication/92946/hacking-the-sustainable-develop-
ment-goals_0.pdf.
7. Ahvenniemi, Hannele, Aapo Huovila, Isabel Pinto-Seppä, and Miimu
Airaksinen. 2017. “What Are the Differences between Sustainable and
Smart Cities?” Cities 60 (February): 234–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cit-
ies.2016.09.009.
44
8. Macleod, Allan and Ian Townsend. 2018. “Bristol Method+: Driving the
Sustainable Development Goals Agenda at the city level in Bristol.” Bristol
Green Capital Partnership. https://bristolgreencapital.org/wp-content/
uploads/2018/07/Bristol-Method_Driving-the-SDGs-agenda-at-city-level-in-
Bristol_17-Jul-2018.pdf.
9. See “Hacking the Sustainable Development Goals: Can US Cities Mea-
sure Up?” (2017).
10. See “Bristol Method+: Driving the Sustainable Development Goals
Agenda at the city level in Bristol.” (2018).
11. See “Hacking the Sustainable Development Goals: Can US Cities Mea-
sure Up?” (2017).
12. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. n.d. “SDG Indicators.”
https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/indicators-list.
13. McCarney, Patricia, James Patava, Birgitte Hansen, Matthew Lynch,
Sahifa Imran, and Nicholas Bakewell. 2017. “WCCD City Data for the United
Nations Sustainable Development Goals 2017.” Toronto: World Council on
City Data (WCCD). https://www.dataforcities.org/publications.
14. United for Smart Sustainable Cities. 2018. “United for Smart Sustainable
Cities: United Smart Cities Index.” https://www.itu.int/en/publications/Docu-
ments/tsb/2017-U4SSC-Collection-Methodology/mobile/index.html.
15. IESE Business School – University of Navarra. 2017. “IESE Cities in
Motion Index.” https://media.iese.edu/research/pdfs/ST-0442-E.pdf.
45
16. Espey, Jessica, Hayden Dahmm, Laurie Manderino, John Biberman,
Yingxin Ye, Gary Verburg, and Juan Puyana. 2018. “Leaving No U.S. City
Behind: The U.S. Cities Sustainable Development Goals Index 2018.” http://
unsdsn.org/resources/publications/leaving-no-u-s-city-behind-the-2018-u-s-
cities-sdgs-index.
17. Arcadis. 2016. “Sustainable Cities Index 2016.” https://www.arcadis.com/
media/0/6/6/%7B06687980-3179-47AD-89FD-F6AFA76EBB73%7DSustain-
able%20Cities%20Index%202016%20Global%20Web.pdf.
18. Sustainable Cities International. 2012. “Indicators for Sustainability:
How Cities Are Monitoring and Evaluating Their Success.” https://sustain-
ablecities.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/indicators-for-sustainability-in-
tl-case-studies-final.pdf.
19. UN-Habitat. 2016. “The Global Goals for Sustainable Development
and City Prosperity Initiative.” http://cpi.unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/
resources/CPI%20and%20SDGs.pdf.
20. Ambiente Italia. 2007. “Urban Ecosystem Europe: An Integrated
Assessment on the Sustainability of 32 European Cities.” http://www.dexia.
com/EN/journalist/press_releases/Documents/20080201_urban_ecosys-
tem_UK.pdf.