airborne measurement system during...

Reports o

AO

C

1. Int The puflight vadown toprogramMIELEC Areaaircraftnavigata comb

on Geodesy an

AIRBORNOF EGNO

Civil Aviatio

Abstract The air traand adeqmeasuringprecisely poverbalanHowever requires aAs part ofparameterEGNOS, GEGNOS Aenabled totransport. Keywords

roduction

urpose of thalidation ao LPV minmme “SupC” [4]. a Navigatiot operationtion signabination of

nd Geoinforma

NE MEASOS/GNSS

An

on PersonnS

t

ansport reqquate procg technologput standar

ncing staticoperational

applying gef conductedrs (accuraGNSS signaAPV Opero draw righ Details wil

s: Flight Va

n

his article activities ofnima, at Kapport to t

on (RNAVn on: any dals, withinthese [10]

atics vol. 96 /

SUREMES ESSEN

ndrzej Fel

nel EducatSilesian Un

quires certifiedures. Hogies depenrd ground sc geodetic l activity, dodetic tech

d air tests thacy, credibals, made arational Impt procedurell be presen

alidation, RN

is to showf one RNAVatowice airthe EGNO

) can be ddesired co the limi.

/2014; pages 2

27

NT SYSTNTIAL PA

lner, Hen

tion Centreniversity of

ficate of groowever app

nd on takensystems and

techniquesdepending ohniques andhey made thbility, availas part of Euplementatio

es up and tonted in the fo

NAV, EGNO

w evidenceAV approacrport [3]. ItOS APV

defined asourse withits of a

27-37

TEM DURARAMET

nryk Jafern

e of CentraTechnolog

ound and dplied geodn undertakd the navigas and meaon the phasd measuringhe validatiolability, couropean proon – APV o apply satefollowing art

OS/GNSS, L

of the woch Instrumet is a deliveOperation

s a methodin the covself-contai

DOI: 1

RING VATERS IN L

nik

al and Eastgy

eck devicesdetic technikings. If oational assiasuring tecse of the flg „technologn of four funtinuity) oojects: “Sup

MIELEC”,ellite signalsticle.

LPV

rk carried ent Flight Perable of tal Implem

d of navigaerage of sined syste

10.2478/rgg-2

ALIDATIOLANDING

tern Europ

s, systems iques and

one should istance are chnologies. light a real

ogies time”. undamental of satellite pport to the air tests

ls in the air

out as parProcedurethe TEN-T

mentation

ation that station-refeem capab

2014-0004

ON G

pe

rt of the es (IFP),

funded – APV

permits erenced bility or

Brought to you by | University of Science and Technology Bydgoszcz/ Biblioteka Glowna UniwersytetuAuthenticated

Download Date | 1/26/15 10:47 AM

Reports o

RNAuse of to or fro

- A

- Ad

- w

Focusindepend

- - A- A

The impleminstrumapproa APVWAAS guidancagainstEGNOSspecificno infrstanda 2. Pro Before RNAV List of (FAS) D

on Geodesy an

AV was deavailable aom any spA route stpoint to redAircraft cadeparture Instrumentwithout locng on theding on theRNAV NPAAPV Baro APV SBADA/H). 36th ICA

ment approment runwaaches by 20V SBAS is

[7] in thece is equt a geometS, presencally desigrastructurelone avion

ocedure p

the accesGNSS appwaypoints

Data Block

nd Geoinforma

eveloped toairspace. Tecific radioructure caduce flight n be flownpaths to ext approachcal instrum last poin

e kind of RA - approa- approach

AS - appro

AO Assemoach proceay ends, eit016 [11]. s supportee USA [6]ivalent to trical path

nts a feasgned for ape on the ics possib

presentatio

sion to theproach [12s (Table 1k (Table 3)

atics vol. 96 /

o provide This methoo navigatioan be orga

distance an into termixpedite trahes can bent landingt, RNAV aNAV appro

ach withouth with barooach with

bly in 200edures withther as the ed by sat and EGNan ILS loin space r

sible solutpproach op

aerodromle thereby

on and gro

e ground a] was nece), Path Te.

Table 1

/2014; pages 2

28

more lateod of navigon aid, andanized betwand traffic nal areas

affic flow; be developg aids at thapproacheoach to bet vertical gometric vergeometric

07 passedh vertical e primary a

tellite basNOS in Eocalizer anrather thantion to Aperations,

mes themsminimising

ound valid

nd air validessary (Figerminators

1. List of wa

27-37

ral freedomgation does

has three ween any separationon varied p

ped and chat airportes can hav

flown [9]:uidance (flrtical guidac vertical

d a resolutguidance

approach o

sed augmeurope to pnd the ven a baromeAPV appro

high accuselves, sug retrofit co

dation

dation, exeg.1). it wass (Table 2)

aypoints

DOI: 1

m and thus not requiprincipal agiven dep

n; pre-progra

certified at

ve several

own LNAVance (LNAVand latera

tion encou(Baro-VNA

or as a bac

entation sprovide latrtical guidetric altitudoaches: nauracy and upports auosts [5].

ecuting thes also nece), Final Ap

10.2478/rgg-2

us more coire a track applicationparture and

ammed arr

t certain a

l descent

V MDA/H); V/VNAV Dal guidanc

uraging StAV, SBASck-up for p

systems steral and

dance is pde. The usavigation integrity, rutopilot co

e proceduressary to ppproach S

2014-0004

omplete directly s:

d arrival

ival and

airports,

minima

DA/H); ce (LPV

tates to ) for all recision

such as vertical

provided e of the system

requires oupling,

re of the prepare:

Segment



Fellner, A

A., Jafernik, H.: Airborne meeasurement sy

Fig. 1

Table 2

ystem during v

29

. Procedure

2. Path Term

validation …

e chart

minators



Reports o

A grbeen p

-

- - T- T

The referenwere ccriteria ILS locof the FconsideTHR09importaobtainsexisting

on Geodesy an

round validerformed tIt has bee[4]; It has beenThe TerraiThe controreviewers

nced. This orrected aconcernin

calizer (LOFPAP shoered that th

9 (runway ant issue s are not eg ILS proce

Fig. 2. FP

nd Geoinforma

T

dation wastogether wen confirme

n confirmein maps usolled obstas involved entailed a

accordinglyng the posC) is locatuld be thehe localizeend) posoperation

exactly theedure. Figu

PAP locatio

atics vol. 96 /

Table 3. FA

s next actioith PANSAed the app

d the datased (DTM fcles arounrealised tsubstantia

y prior to thsition wherted more te one specer was location, beingally speake same thure 3. show

n, ILS local

/2014; pages 2

30

AS Databloc

on. The re

A and Pildoplication o

accuracy from SRTM

nd the airpohat one o

al reductionhe flight trre the FPAhan 305 m

cified in theated at 305g the lengking. The hat the onws this sm

izier more t

27-37

ck input dat

eview of tho. The mainof the crite

and integrM with 90 mort were prf the obstn of the LPrials. ThereAP has beemeters frome figure 2. 5 m. Therefgth offset

horizontaes that woall differen

than 305 m

DOI: 1

a

he IFP desn outcomeria specifie

rity; m accuracyrovided by acles (ID#

PV minima e is a slighen locatedm THR09.

The codiffore the FPnil. Howe

al deviationould be ob

nce.

from the ru

10.2478/rgg-2

sign packaes are: ed in PAN

y); the airpor

#79) was nvalue. The

ht deviationd. In KatowThus the

fication pePAP was cever, it is ns that thbtained fly

unway end

2014-0004

age has

NS-OPS

rt. not well e charts n of the wice the position rformed

coded in not an

he pilot ying the



Fellner, A

Fig.

Pre-order tprovideSegme

- O- A

3. Flig The fovalidati

- T- T- T- A

t- A- T

v- T

c The with the430W callows LPV minside aFV planavigatincludin

A., Jafernik, H.

3 Differenc

flight valido validate

ed two screent Data bloOne usingAnother usDO-229D.

ght valida

ollowing guon activitieThe validaThe MisseThe Final AAll segmenthe LNAV A test dataThere wasvalidation The aircracapabilitiesFV was c

e appropriaconnectedflying duri

minima. Thea test datan inside thtion mode ng aircraft

: Airborne me

ce between

ation was the codin

eenshots wock: the onlinesing the in

ation

uidelines wes: ation was ced ApproacApproach nts of the approache

abase conts one pilot process ob

aft used dus for whichconducted ate RNAV with otheng all phase IFP to babase prodhe FMS-lik

using thepositioning

easurement sy

the Full Sc

next actiong of the d

with the res

e application-house to

were take

carried out ch segmenSegment happroach

es were alrtaining the acting as

bserving thuring the flih the IFP w

with a Pipequipmenr required ses of flighbe validateduced by

ke Garmin e GPS/SBAg, was prov

ystem during v

31

cale Deflect

n. A Jeppdatabase usults of the

on developol develop

en into co

in daylightnt was flowhas to be fwere flownready flownRNAV IFPFVP, and

he ‘out of cight valida

was designper Senec

nt for conduavionics (

ht, from ened, designJeppesen device an

AS guidanvided by th

validation …

ion of the IL

esen codinused in thee CRC gen

ped by EURped by Pild

onsideration

t hours undn; flown ½ scn at least on during thP was usedone obser

cockpit’ envtion had thed.

ca II aircraucting LPV(antenna, Cn-route to ped by Pildand Garm

nd conductce. Guida

he CDI/VD

LS with resp

ng screense aircraft. neration an

ROCONTRdo Labs in

n for cond

der VMC c

ale down, once (segmhe LNAV vad; ver assistivironment; he appropr

aft. The airV operationCDI/VDI). precision a

do and PAmin. The pted the triance duringI fed by the

pect to the

shot is provFurthermo

nd Final Ap

ROL n accordan

ducting th

conditions;

at least onments comalidation fli

ng the FV riate perfo

rcraft is eqns: a GarmThe compapproach d

ANSA, waspilots inserals in the rg the entire GNS 430

APV

vided in ore, it is pproach

nce with

he flight

nce; mmon to ights);

P in the

ormance

quipped min GNS plete set down to s coded rted the relevant re flight, 0W.



Reports o

Befoa predithe AR

-

- TC

- Tw

The The essimulatKatowic The show tdrawn j The with thesuccesmissedaltitude

- 5a

- - 9

on Geodesy an

ore the flighctive RAIMP, consideNo digital (useful in mountainoThe GPS Center weThe simulawith sampobtained

stimated htions ensuce during tdata analy

the trajectjointly withfollowing f

e waypoinssfully accod approaches have be5000 ft, wapproache1235 ft, wh991 ft, whi

nd Geoinforma

ht trials, thM algorithmering also tterrain mosome env

ous environalmanac wbsite; ation was les every 5result is o

horizontal aured that tthe whole dysis focuseories flow

h the testedfigures prets and runomplished

h or a landien plotted

which is thes; hich is the ch is the e

atics vol. 96 /

he local APm developethe followinodel was uironments

nment); was down

carried ou5 minutes.f a 100% and verticthe EGNOday. es on the dn during td paths (yeesent the fnway thres

the operang was co: he minimu

CAT a LPVelevation of

Fig. 4. DO

/2014; pages 2

32

PV-1 availaed by Pildong conditioused to sim

to take in

nloaded fro

t for a 12

APV-1 avacal errors wOS would e

data recordthe approaellow lines)flight trajecshold (Fig. ations up onducted. I

um altitude

V minima f RWY 27

OP for Kato

27-37

ability in tho Labs. Theons: mulate the nto accoun

om the U.S

hours data

ailability atwere alsoenable an

ded during aches (Fig). ctories of t6, 7). It cato the OCn the profi

e to fly th

(OCA) of tTHR

owice ARP

DOI: 1

e area wae analysis

local condnt the mas

S. Coast G

aset (from

t the thresestimated

APV-1 le

the flightsg. 5). The

he demonan be seen

CA/H valuele views, t

he initial s

he procedu

10.2478/rgg-2

as simulatewas perfo

ditions of tking cause

Guard Nav

9:00h to 2

shold coordd (Fig. 4).evel of se

s. The nexte approach

nstrations tn how the es, when ethe next re

segments

ures;

2014-0004

ed using rmed at

he area ed by a

vigation

21:00h),

dinates. . These rvice at

t figures hes are

together aircraft

either a eference

of both



Fellner, A

.

A., Jafernik, H.

Fig. 6. App

Fig.7. Appr

: Airborne me

Fig. 5

proach 1: pla

roach 2: pla

easurement sy

5. Plan view

an view of A

an view of A

ystem during v

33

w of the fligh

A/C flight pa

A/C flight pa

validation …

ht demonstr

ath (left), A/

ath (left), A/C

rations

C altitude p

C altitude p

profile (right

profile (right)

t)

)



Reports o

A qudeviatiodeviatioare prehorizonguidancdetermthe leftsegmeduring figures verticalwould htotally daccordaconstanthe req

4. Co The LPairport providinof the v

on Geodesy an

uestion abons presenons have esented inntal or vertce informa

mined usingt show thents, while the FAS. T(cyan colo

l domain. have had wdeflected. ance to Mnt, and theuirements

onclusions

PV flight properators

ng excellevalidation o

nd Geoinforma

bout flight nted to thebeen comn the figutical Flight ation to theg truth refee deviationthe figure

The FSD (or) when cThese curwith respeThe curve

MOPS RTey change

laid down

Fig. 8. Ap

s

rocedures s in case nt aircraft of the new

atics vol. 96 /

deviationse pilot durputed withre 8. TheTechnical

e pilot durinerence aftens of the as located Full Scale

contained irves indica

ect to the as have beeCA DO-22between lin the MO

pproach 2: h

for Katowof ILS inguidance,GNSS pro

/2014; pages 2

34

s is essentring the aph respect te distance Error (FT

ng the fligher post-proa/c during in the righ Deflectionn the figurate the vaapproach pen calculat29D [8]. Ainear and

OPS.

horizontal a

wice providenactive. Th appreciat

ocedure ar

27-37

tial. To happroaches,to the dess in the

TE) in meteht, while theocessing t

the intermht side offen) of the Cre limits, bolue of the path if the ted using iAs can beangular al

and vertical

e tangible he EGNOted by the re as follow

DOI: 1

ave a clea, the horizired flight vertical ax

ers. The FTe NSE andhe data. Fmediate aner a zoom DI/VDI is aoth in the h

deviationsCDI/VDI nn-house d

e seen, thong the ap

deviations

operationaS system pilots. Th

ws:

10.2478/rgg-2

arer picturezontal and

path. Thexis represTE is provd TSE can Figures locnd final apof the de

also plottehorizontal s that the needles haeveloped t

he FSDs pproach, fo

al benefitswas cap

e main ou

2014-0004

e of the vertical results ent the

vided as only be

cated in pproach viations d in the and the aircraft

ad been tools, in are not ollowing

s for the pable of utcomes



Fellner, A., Jafernik, H.: Airborne measurement system during validation …

35

- The EGNOS availability performance APV-I was fully achieved during all the approaches;

- The coding of the procedure for SBAS is satisfactory; - The horizontal and vertical sensibility of the CDI was successfully tested; - The procedure is safe from the obstacle clearance point of view (it has been

flown ½ scale down the nominal glide path without identifying potential obstacles);

- No significant obstacles were found when overflying the surroundings of the airport either;

- The flyability of the procedure was correct. The ground and flight validation performed are successful. As a result of conducted research, in April 2013 was placed twenty one of procedures for airports in AIP POLAND. References [1] EASA - AMC 20-26 : Airworthiness Approval and Operational Criteria for RNP AR

Operations; [2] EASA - AMC 20-27: Airworthiness Approval and Operational Criteria for RNP

APPROACH (RNP APCH) Operations Including APV BARO VNAV Operations; [3] EASA - Helicopters Deploy GNSS in Europe (HEDGE) project documentation, [4] EGNOS Introduction in European Eastern Region MIELEC project documentation, [5] FAA - AC 20-129: Airworthiness Approval for Vertical Navigation (VNAV) Systems

for Use in the U.S. National Airspace System (NAS) and Alaska; [6] FAA - AC 20-105: Approval Guidance for RNP Operations and Barometric Vertical

Navigation in the U.S. National Airspace System; [7] FAA: TSO C145A: Airborne Navigation Sensors Using the Global Positioning

System (GPS) Augmented by the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS); [8] FAA - TSO C146A: Stand-Alone Airborne Navigation Equipment Using the Global

Positioning System Augmented by the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS); [9] ICAO Annex 10, [10] ICAO Doc 8168 – PANS-OPS, [11] ICAO Doc 9613 – PBN Manual, [12] ICAO Doc 9905 – RNP AR Procedure Design Manual



Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics vol. 96 /2014; pages 27-37 DOI: 10.2478/rgg-2014-0004

36

Acronyms and Abbreviations A/C - Aircraft AD - Aerodrome or Airport AGL- Above Ground Level AIP - Aeronautical Information Publication APV - Approach with Vertical guidance ARP - Aerodrome Reference Point CDI - Course Display Indicator CRC - Cyclic Redundancy Check DA/DH - Decision Altitud/ decision Height DF - Direct to Fix DOP - Dilution of Precision DTM - Digital Terrain Model EGNOS - European Geostationary Navigation Overlay System EPKT - ICAO code for Katowice International airport ESSP - European Satellite Service Provider FAP - Final Approach Fix FAS - Final Approach Segment FPAP - Flight Path Alignment Point FSD - Full Scale Deflection FTE - Flight Technical Error FVP - Flight Validation Pilot GNSS - Global Navigation Satellite System GPS - Global Positioning System IAF - Initial Approach Fix ICAO - International Civil Aviation Organisation ID - Identifier IF - Intermediate Fix (Initial Fix for Path terminators) IFP - Instrument Flight Procedure IFR - Instrumental Flight Rules ILS - Instrumental Landing System LNAV/VNAV - Lateral/Vertical Navigation LPV - Localizer Performance with Vertical guidance LTP - Landing Threshold Point MA - Missed Approach MOPS - Minimum Operational Performance Specifications NM - Nautical Miles NPA - Non Precision Approach OCA/H - Obstacle Clearance Altitude/ Height PANSA - Polish Air Navigation Services Agency RAIM Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring RNAV - Area Navigation RWY - Runway SBAS - Satellite Based Augmentation System SIS - Signal in space TCH - Threshold Crossing Height TF - Track to Fix THR - Threshold VDI - Vertical Display Indicator



Fellner, A., Jafernik, H.: Airborne measurement system during validation …

37

VFR - Visual Flight Rules VMC - Visual Meteorological Conditions WAAS - Wide Area Augmentation System WGS - World Geodesic System WP – Waypoint LOC - Localiser (azimuth guidance portion of ILS) MDA - Minimum Decision Altitude MDH - Minimum Decision Height LNAV - Lateral Navigation VNAV - Vertical Navigation NSE - Navigation System Error RTCA - Requirements and Technical Concepts for Aviation TEN-T - Trans-European Networks - Transport TSE - Total System Error Authors:

Prof. D. Sc Eng. navig Andrzej Fellner 1), [email protected] D. Sc, Eng. Henryk Jafernik 1), [email protected] 1) Civil Aviation Personnel Education Centre of Central and Eastern Europe, Silesian University of Technology, 8 Krasinskiego str., 40-019 Katowice, Poland



airborne measurement system during...

Documents