air transportation systems lab virginia tech oshkosh, wi july 29- august 3, 2003

19
Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003 Transportation Systems Analysis for the SATS Program

Upload: hova

Post on 11-Jan-2016

23 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003. Transportation Systems Analysis for the SATS Program. Credits. Dr. A.A. Trani (Project Lead) Dr. H. Baik and H. Swingle (Research Scientists) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003

Air Transportation Systems LabVirginia Tech

Oshkosh, WIJuly 29- August 3, 2003

Transportation Systems Analysis for the SATS Program

Page 2: Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003

Credits

• Dr. A.A. Trani (Project Lead)

• Dr. H. Baik and H. Swingle (Research Scientists)

• A. Ashiabor, S. Seshadri, K. Murthy, and N. Hinze (Graduate Research Associates)

Page 3: Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003

Integrated Transportation System Decision Support Model

ScenarioDefinition

Intercity ModelScenario Analysis

Intercity NetworkAnalysis

Intercity ModalSplit Analysis

Trip DistributionAnalysis

Travel Studies(all modes)Trip Generation

Analysis

InventoryStudies

Feedback Loop

Feedback Loop

Feedback Loop

InformationTechnology

National AirspaceSystem

TransportationCost Models

Intercity vehicle characteristics

TransportationVehicle

Performance Models

National andRegional

Economic Models

Blue = Dynamic ModelBlue = Dynamic ModelYellow = Aerospace TechnologyYellow = Aerospace Technology

NAS MetricsNAS MetricsTravel timeEconomic benefitsNoiseTraffic densitiesEnergy use

Page 4: Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003

Integrated Transportation System Decision Support Model

Socio-economic DataSocio-economic DataAirports and CharacteristicsAirports and Characteristics

Aircraft Performance and Cost Aircraft Performance and Cost CharacteristicsCharacteristics

ScenarioDefinition

Intercity ModelScenario Analysis

Intercity NetworkAnalysis

Intercity ModalSplit Analysis

Trip DistributionAnalysis

Travel Studies(all modes)Trip Generation

Analysis

InventoryStudies

Feedback Loop

Feedback Loop

Feedback Loop

InformationTechnology

National AirspaceSystem

TransportationCost Models

Intercity vehicle characteristics

TransportationVehicle

Performance Models

National andRegional

Economic Models

ScenarioDefinition

Intercity ModelScenario Analysis

Intercity NetworkAnalysis

Intercity ModalSplit Analysis

Trip DistributionAnalysis

Travel Studies(all modes)Trip Generation

Analysis

InventoryStudies

Feedback Loop

Feedback Loop

Feedback Loop

InformationTechnology

National AirspaceSystem

TransportationCost Models

Intercity vehicle characteristics

TransportationVehicle

Performance Models

National andRegional

Economic Models

ScenarioDefinition

Intercity ModelScenario Analysis

Intercity NetworkAnalysis

Intercity ModalSplit Analysis

Trip DistributionAnalysis

Travel Studies(all modes)Trip Generation

Analysis

InventoryStudies

Feedback Loop

Feedback Loop

Feedback Loop

InformationTechnology

National AirspaceSystem

TransportationCost Models

Intercity vehicle characteristics

TransportationVehicle

Performance Models

National andRegional

Economic Models

Baseline yearBaseline year

Horizon TimeHorizon Time

Air Traffic Structure and Air Traffic Structure and CONOPSCONOPS

Air Transportation Network Air Transportation Network and Schedulesand Schedules

Page 5: Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003

The Role of Aerospace Technology in the Transportation DSM

ScenarioDefinition

Intercity ModelScenario Analysis

Intercity NetworkAnalysis

Intercity ModalSplit Analysis

Trip DistributionAnalysis

Travel Studies(all modes)Trip Generation

Analysis

InventoryStudies

Feedback Loop

Feedback Loop

Feedback Loop

InformationTechnology

National AirspaceSystem

TransportationCost Models

Intercity vehicle characteristics

TransportationVehicle

Performance Models

National andRegional

Economic Models

HypersonicHypersonic HelicopterHelicopter

Tiltrotor/RIATiltrotor/RIA

SubsonicSubsonic

GA / CorporateGA / Corporate

SupersonicSupersonic

NAS MetricsNAS MetricsTravel timeEconomic benefitsNoiseTraffic densitiesEnergy use

Page 6: Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003

Questions to be Answered with the Decision Support Model

• Reduce the travel time from door-to-destination by n percent

• What price for aerospace technology x is needed to achieve y(%) increase in air transportation demand?

• Use the integrated transportation systems model to investigate what aerospace technologies are needed to achieve the goal

• What is the impact of aerospace technology x in the fuel, energy consumption and the environment?

Page 7: Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003

Trip Demand Generation

Given: Socio-economic characteristics for each county (for all states)

Predict: a) Number of trips produced per household/year

for various income levels b) Trips attracted to a county

Use: Trip rate tables

2

46

810

x 104

0

2

4

6

80

2

4

6

8

Annual Household Income ($)

Years AfterHigh School

Person-tripsper Year

per Household

Page 8: Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 35000

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Intercity Trip are Influenced by Income and Trip Purpose

Data: ATS 1995Data: ATS 1995

High IncomeHigh Income

Medium IncomeMedium Income

Low IncomeLow Income

One-Way Trip Distance (miles)One-Way Trip Distance (miles)

Per

cen

t T

rave

lers

by

Air

(%

)P

erce

nt

Tra

vele

rs b

y A

ir (

%)

Page 9: Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003

U.S. County Population Forecast(2000-2025)

Woods and Poole Economic ModelWoods and Poole Economic Model

Page 10: Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003

Average U.S. County HouseholdIncome Forecast (2000-2025)

Woods and Poole Economic ModelWoods and Poole Economic Model

Page 11: Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003

Originating Intercity Trip Forecast (2000-2025)

Page 12: Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003

Trip Distribution Analysis

Given: Trips produced from and attracted to each county

Predict: a) Number of person-trips from each origin to every

destination (county to county)

Use: Gravity Model

Tij

PiAjFij Kij

AjFij Kijj1=

n

-----------------------------------=

Page 13: Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003

Transportation Modal Split

Given: Trips from each origin to each destinationPredict: a) Number of person-trips

for every mode of transportation availableUse: Nested Multinomial Logit Model and Diversion Curves

AutomobileAviation

General Commercial

Traveler

Aviation Aviation

Bus Key variables: travel cost, door-to-door travel time, perceived safety

Page 14: Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003

Location of Airports and PopulationInfluences Mode Split

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Distance to Airport (statute miles)

Pe

rce

nt

of

Po

pu

latio

n

TextEnd

Towered Towered Airports (474)Airports (474) Hub Airports (135)Hub Airports (135)

Census 1990 and 2000Census 1990 and 2000Data with 61,224 tractsData with 61,224 tractsin NASin NAS

3348 Airports3348 Airports

Large Hub Airports (30)Large Hub Airports (30)QuickTime™ and aPhoto - JPEG decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Travel patterns are heavily influencedTravel patterns are heavily influencedby cost economicsby cost economics

Page 15: Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003

SATS vs. Other Modes:Very Light Jet Aircraft Cost

Assumptions on SATS travel: jet aircraft, less than 10,000 pounds total weight, utilized 500 hours per year, no deadhead legs, 3 passengers, two pilots.

$186$174$162

$448

$358

$269

$1053

$714

$366

600 Miles 900 Miles 300 Miles

Coach Business

SATS

Coach

Business

SATS

Coach

Business

SATS

Page 16: Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003

SATS vs. Other Modes:Very Light Jet Aircraft Cost

$186$174$162

$448

$358

$269

$801

$546

$282

Coach

Business

SATS

Coach

Business

SATS

Coach

Business

SATS

300 Miles 600 Miles 900 Miles

Assumptions on SATS travel: jet aircraft, less than 10,000 pounds total weight, utilized 500 hours per year, no deadhead legs, 3 passengers, one pilot.

Page 17: Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003

Transportation Network Analysis

Aircraft Point Performance

Model

Aircraft Trajectory Generator

OD Person-trips by Mode

(from Modal Split Analysis)

Air Traffic Control Operational Flight Rules

Aircraft 4D Trajectories

MicroscopicSimulation

Model

Measures ofEffectiveness

(delays, conflicts, workload, safety)

NAS Sectorand Special Use

Airspace Database

TransportationSystemsAnalysis Modules

(Trip generation,Trip distribution,and Modal Split)

Hourly DemandFunctionDatabase

NAS Concept ofOperations

OD Flights per Year

by aircraft type

Fuel, Energyand Environmental

Metrics

Page 18: Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003

Flight Trajectory Aircraft Model

Airbus A320Airbus A320Jacksonville - MiamiJacksonville - Miami

Flight trajectory module employs the Flight trajectory module employs the Eurocontrol’s BADA modelEurocontrol’s BADA model

Page 19: Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003

Concluding Remarks

• An integrated transportation model has been developed

• The model can be used in the evaluation of future aerospace technologies

• The model is flexible enough to incorporate new assumptions and models developed elsewhere

• National-level environmental impacts require a model capable of expressing spatial demand and supply patterns (I.e., equivalent to FEM/CFD techniques used in aerospace)