air quality forecasting in canada: current status ... · pdf fileair quality forecasting in...
TRANSCRIPT
Air Quality Forecasting in Canada: Current Status, Performance, and
Future Developments
WWOSC/IWAQFR 2014, MontréalDidier Davignon & colleagues,Meteorological Service of Canada,Environment Canada2014-08-19
Page 2 – 31 octobre 2014
Summary
• Canadian context• RAQDPS overview
– GEM-MACH– Emissions & boundary conditions– Operational implementation– Statistical model– Products– Observation database & model evaluation– Objective analysis– Forest fire modelling
• Possible future directions
Page 3 – 31 octobre 2014
Canadian context
• Air quality (AQ) involves many jurisdictions• Environment Canada (EC) assuming leadership on AQ
science– Developed expertise on AQ modelling– Building on existing weather forecast systems– Provide a nation-wide unified set of products
• AQ forecast as an health tool– Communicate to the public through the Air Quality Health Index– Issue warnings in collaboration with provinces– Program developed with Health Canada
Page 4 – 31 octobre 2014
Who’s involved in Canadian AQ forecast
• Surface observations: EC S&T, provinces & large cities• Collecting real-time observations: EC Met Service (MSC)• Developing weather & AQ models: EC S&T• Designing & operating AQ forecast systems: EC MSC• Issuing forecast & warnings: MSC forecasting offices• Publishing public forecast & warnings: EC
communications, provinces• Developing Air Quality Health Index (AQHI): Health
Canada & health partners• Public health actions/decisions: public health partners
Page 5 – 31 octobre 2014
RAQDPS: components
RAQDPS = Regional Air QualityDeterministic Prediction System
Page 6 – 31 octobre 2014
RAQDPS: GEM-MACH
Page 7 – 31 octobre 2014
GEM-MACH v1
• Was developed as a component of the Canadian weather model GEM
• Semi-lagrangian advection, semi-implicit formulation• Rotated lat-long grids, global or regional• Cascading possible• Verified world-class performance at global & regional scales
• Implementation of chemistry Air quality fully online, potential for 2-way coupling Chemistry solved by column Oxidant (ADOM-II) and aerosol chemistry, aqueous &
heterogeneous chemistry Vertical diffusion, wet & dry deposition Sectional representation of PM size distribution with 8 chemical PM
components
Page 8 – 31 octobre 2014
GEM-MACH, operational version (v1.5.1)
GEM-MACH10 Grid
GEM-LAM10 Grid• Regional system with a domain covering North America
Subdomain of the regional weather model Inherits assimilated weather 10 km horizontal grid spacing 80 vertical levels with lid at 0.1 hPa runs twice daily (00z, 12z) 5 minutes time step for weather
(and tracer advection) 15 minutes time step for solving chemistry One-way coupling (meteorology affects chemistry) 2-bin sectional representation of PM size distribution
(i.e., 0-2.5 μm and 2.5-10 μm) with 8 chemical PM components
Page 9 – 31 octobre 2014
RAQDPS: Emissions & input
Page 10 – 31 octobre 2014
Emissions
• Processing emission inventories with SMOKE– Canada 2006, to be updated to 2010– USA EPA 2005 v4.2 projected to 2012– Processing area sources, point sources, mobile sources
▪ More than 10 000 major points, processed individually in the model– Provide hourly speciated profiles for a typical weak, each month
• Biogenic emissions– Four emission factors: NO, isoprene, monoterpenes & other
VOCs – Using BEIS system with BELD3 vegetation database (231
categories), + Canadian National Forest Inventory– Adjust emissions rates online according to meteorology
▪ Solar radiation, cloud cover, 10m temperature
Page 11 – 31 octobre 2014
Boundary conditions
• Using previous 12h forecast as initial AQ conditions• Using the operational weather analysis as initial weather
conditions• Weather piloting from the operational weather runs
(which is on a larger domain)• AQ piloting: using a climatology at the boundaries
– Vary according to month of the year
Page 12 – 31 octobre 2014
RAQDPS: statistical model
Page 13 – 31 octobre 2014
Statistical model: UMOS-AQ
• Post-processing applied to GEM-MACH raw model output
• Corrects model bias (at point locations) through multi-variate linear regression approach
– Applied to meteorological variables since 2000– Adapted for air quality variables (O3, NO2, PM2.5) in 2010– Predictors:
▪ Meteorological and chemical variables from GEM-MACH▪ Persistence (observations at 00Z or 12Z, depending on model run)
– Equations are recalculated four times a month– Has two seasons (summer/winter) with a transitional period of
approximately six weeks
Page 14 – 31 octobre 2014
Statistical model: UMOS-AQ
• Strengths:– Consistently removes model bias for improved day-to-day
predictability– Provides point forecast
• Weakness:– Method is dependent upon having a large statistical database of
past events, so performance during rarely occurring, bad air quality episodes can be poor
– Using linear techniques only ▪ Non-linear approaches are currently under investigation
– Equations must be recalculated for every model change ▪ Difficult to use in model development
– Page 15 –
GEM-MACH/UMOS PerformanceGEM-MACHUMOS-AQ
BIA
SR
MS
E
O3
PM2.5
NO2
Page 16 – 31 octobre 2014
GEM-MACH/UMOS PerformanceGEM-MACHUMOS
BIA
SR
MS
E
O3
PM2.5
NO2
Page 17 – 31 octobre 2014
RAQDPS: products
Page 18 – 31 octobre 2014
Products: Air Quality Health Index
Used for public forecast- Multi-pollutant index- Triggers warnings
Page 19 – 31 octobre 2014
Products: forecasters tools
• Air quality forecast is prepared by site. • Forecasters examine time series of
– Recent observations– Hourly forecasted for the 3 AQHI pollutant (O3, PM2.5, NO2), with
a 3h running average▪ From UMOS-AQ
– Resulting AQHI
• Additionnal products are made available to forecasters– Internal website with all monitoring sites observations &
forecasts ▪ Plus output from parallel runs (when available)
– Allow investigation of special situations
Page 20 – 31 octobre 2014
AQHI Forecaster Resource Site
Page 21 – 31 octobre 2014
Other products
• Maps of model output for ozone, PM2.5 at the surface, 50m and 500m are published on our public website.
– Raw model output to be used with care
• Hourly objective analysis for O3, PM2.5 (not public yet)• Internal website with AQHI including the impact of forest
fires• Animations of forest fire forecasted plumes over North-
America
Page 22 – 31 octobre 2014
RAQDPS: verification
Page 23 – 31 octobre 2014
VAQUM: Verification for Air Quality Models
• Designed a PostGIS database to store AQ observations and corresponding model outputs
– Can ingest both real time and QC’ed historical datasets– Allows to produce various statistics & categorical scores– About 1730 stations (265 CAN, 1465 USA)– Maximises the use of metadata– Collecting data since 2007
• Essential tool to assess the impact of model updates• Monitoring the performance of the operational system
Page 24 – 31 octobre 2014
RAQDPS: objective analysis
Page 25 – 31 octobre 2014
OA: Objective Analysis for Surface Pollutants
• Operational as of February 2013 • Blends model forecasts with surface observations from Canadian
regional networks and the U.S. EPA/AIRNow observation network– Using an optimal interpolation approach– Knowledge of the errors of model and observation data is applied to
weight each input accordingly• Products available hourly (2x = early and late analyses):
– O3 and PM2.5 (NO2 under development)– Possibility for AQHI maps derived from individual analyses for O3,
PM2.5, and NO2
• Analyses are not yet used to initialize GEM-MACH– Tests have been made, applying a correlation factor to spread
information at the surface into the vertical dimension– Results show an improvement in the short-term forecast
Page 26 – 31 octobre 2014
GEM-MACH
Analysis Increments
Observations
Objective Analysis
Ozone
Page 27 – 31 octobre 2014
RAQDPS: Forest Fires
Page 28 – 31 octobre 2014
Forest Fire modelling
• Now possible thanks to:– Near real-time hotspot data available for all of North-America– Partners from the Canadian & US Forest Services provide fire
activity and characteristics in near real-time (NRCan)– BlueSky initiative provides tools to compute emissions from the
above data
• Large interest from emergency management partners• Mostly developed with the objective of improving the air
quality forecast– Run as a parallel product
Page 29 – 31 octobre 2014
Sample Output (2013-07-02 run)PM2.5 animations : FireWork - Operational
Page 30 – 31 octobre 2014
Possible Future Directions
• Change how we communicate AQHI?– Now publishing AQHI only for communities where monitoring is
available for all 3 pollutants▪ Forecast done only where AQHI can be observed
– Provide the analysed AQHI everywhere else?▪ Not all partners may want this
– Provide a forecasted AQHI across the domain?▪ Need a sound approach to 2D statistical correction
Page 31 – 31 octobre 2014
Possible Future Directions
• Benefits of activating feedbacks to meteorology?– Higher under special situations, e.g. forest fires– Need to better parametrise aerosol direct & indirect effects– SCI-PS129.02 - A study of feedbacks between weather and air-
pollution using GEM-MACH (last Monday, P Makar & W. Gong)
• Moving towards AQ forecast with Forest Fires?– How to deal with predictability of FF emissions– Should we keep contribution of FF to AQ distinct?– Need to secure hotspot remote sensing data provision– Implement more comprehensive plume rise algorithm (Freitas)– Challenges in adapting surface objective analysis / assimilation
systems to FF (defining model errors)
Page 32 – 31 octobre 2014
Possible Future Directions
• Benefits of higher resolution deterministic AQ systems?
– Have been testing 2.5km windows over Prairies & Southern Ontario
– Benefits of representing finer scale features important to AQ▪ Refined spatial allocation of emissions▪ Lake breeze▪ Urban Heat Island▪ Urban aerosols & feedbacks to radiation/convection/cloud
formation– Chemical parameterisations sensitive to resolution– See presentation by Craig Stroud, Wednesday 5:20pm: SCI-
PS225.03 - Development of an air quality prediction system for the 2015 PanAm Games in Toronto
Page 33 – 31 octobre 2014
Possible Future Directions
• Ensemble AQ systems?– Allowing probabilistic forecast (chances of exceeding AQ
thresholds)– Challenge of defining balanced perturbations
▪ Weather model processes▪ Emissions▪ Chemical processes
– Computationally expensive.▪ Look for multi-model, multi-agency systems?
Page 34 – 31 octobre 2014
Possible Future Directions
• AQ data assimilation?– Start with assimilation of surface OA– Presentation by A. Robichaud this morning: SCI-PS159.03 -
Assimilation of surface chemical species observations into the Canadian GEM-MACH model using optimal interpolation
– Move to En-Var assimilation of the whole atmosphere?
• Improve model skill for other pollutants?– Partners expressed interest in SO2, VOCs, PM1.0, HS, etc.– Challenge is validation with scarce observations– Designing intensive measurement campaigns for that purpose
Page 35 – 31 octobre 2014
Possible Future Directions
• Improve statistical models further?– Move to non-linear multivariate updatable models– Improve capacity to preserve exceptional events– Expand to additional predictors (model species, land-use, etc.)
• Take advantage of high resolution (sub-km) surface weather models
– Provide predictors to statistical model?– Use for downscaling?
▪ Should we provide different forecast for near-road, downtown, residential areas, etc?
– Design an AQ surface model for urban areas?
Page 36 – 31 octobre 2014
Thank you!
Authors: D. Davignon1, D. Anselmo1, P.-A. Beaulieu1, S. Gilbert1, S. Gravel2, H. Landry1, P. Makar3, S. Menard1, M.D. Moran3, R. Pavlovic1 and C. Stroud 3
1Air Quality Modeling Applications Section, Environment Canada, Dorval, QC, Canada. 2Air Quality Research Division, Environment Canada, Dorval, QC, Canada. 3Air Quality Research Division, Environment Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada.