agenda - city of hugobed5c6a0... · 8/3/2020 · j.1 approve comprehensive stormwater management...

Meeting will be held remotely pursuant to MN Statute Sec. 13D.021. Anyone who wishes to speak at the meeting is strongly encouraged to make arrangements by 4:30 p.m. on the meeting day by contacting City Clerk Michele Lindau at 651-762-6315.For more information on the remote meeting and participation, go to https://www.ci.hugo.mn.us/participate. Meeting ID # 845 8658 9285

A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

1. July 20, 2020, Council Meeting

E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA F. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS

1. Update on COVID-19 City Response G. CONSENT AGENDA

All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion and a roll call vote. If a member of the City Council or the public wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.

1. Approve Claims Roster 2. Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Mechanic Dave Greeder 3. Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Director Scott Anderson 4. Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Lead Worker Mike Loeffler 5. Approve Automatic Aid/Mutual Aid Agreement with Lino Lakes

Agenda

HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HUGO CITY HALL

MONDAY, AUGUST 3, 2020 – 7 P.M.

H. PUBLIC HEARING

1. None Scheduled I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS

1. None Scheduled

J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Approve Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan

K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS

1. None Scheduled

L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS

1. Update on Yellow Ribbon Network

M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS

1. Reschedule September 7, 2020, Council Meeting to September 8, 2020

N. ADJOURNMENT

BACKGROUND MEMO FOR THE HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON AUGUST 3, 2020 D.1 Approval of Minutes for the July 20, 2020, Council Meeting Staff recommends Council approve of the minutes for the July 20, 2020, City Council meeting as presented. F.1 Update on COVID-19 City Response City Administrator Bryan Bear will provide an update on how the City is responding to the coronavirus pandemic and request the Council approve the Budget for the CARES Act. G.1 Approve Claims Roster Staff recommends Council approve the Claims Roster as presented. G.2 Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Mechanic Dave Greeder Dave Greeder was hired by the City of Hugo as the mechanic in the Public Works Department on August 8, 2005. Public Works Director Scott Anderson recommends Council approve the annual performance review for Public Works Mechanic Dave Greeder. G.3 Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Director Scott Anderson Scott Anderson was hired by the City of Hugo on August 11, 2003 as a Senior Engineering Technician, and on August 5, 2008, Scott was promoted as the City’s Public Works Director. City Administrator Bryan Bear recommends Council approve the annual performance review for Public Works Director Scott Anderson. G.4 Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Lead Worker Mike Loeffler Mike Loeffler was hired as a Maintenance Worker for the City of Hugo’s Public Works Department on August 5, 2002. On October 17, 2011, Mike was promoted to be the Public Works Lead Worker. Public Works Director Scott Anderson recommends Council approve the annual performance review for Public Works Lead Worker Mike Loeffler.

G.5 Approve Automatic Aid/Mutual Aid Agreement with Lino Lakes The Hugo Fire Department is requesting approval from Council to enter into an Automatic Aid Agreement with Lino Lakes for use of fire personnel and equipment. This agreement would authorize the joint and cooperative exercise of powers between the fire departments. Staff recommends Council approve the Automatic Aid/Mutual Aid Agreement between the cities of Hugo and Lino Lakes for the dispatch and use of fire personnel and equipment.

J.1 Approve Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan The Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP) describes and tracks a system of regional volume reduction projects (primarily runoff reuse for irrigation) that generate volume reduction credits, The City of Hugo intends to use these credits in lieu of stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) on select roadway and redevelopment projects. RCWD rules allow stormwater management projects to be implemented off-site of a development or road improvement project, as long as they are in the same Resources of Concern drainage area. The City of Hugo can develop and implement regional projects and apply the water quality credits generated by the projects to future roadway improvements or land development activities. Projects that have already been implemented are included in this document. These generated credits will offset the initial capital cost of these water reuse projects by decreasing the stormwater management costs of future roadway improvement projects. The City can also sell these credits to a developer where onsite stormwater Best Management Practices have difficulty being met onsite. Staff recommends approval of the resolution approving the City of Hugo Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan. L.1 Update on Yellow Ribbon Network Council Member Chuck Haas and Phil Klein will report to Council on the Yellow Ribbon Network activities held recently. M.1 Reschedule the September 7, 2020 City Council Meeting to Tuesday, September 8, 2020 Each year, the Hugo City Council has to reschedule its first meeting in September due to the Labor Day Federal Holiday. City staff recommends Council reschedule their regular Council meeting on Monday, September 7th to Tuesday, September 8th due to the Labor Day Holiday. N. Adjournment

Meeting held remotely pursuant to MN Statute Sec. 13D.021. ZOOM Meeting ID # 841 1131 4644 Acting Mayor Petryk called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. COUNCIL PRESENT REMOTELY: Haas, Miron, Petryk COUNCIL ABSENT: Klein, Weidt OTHERS PRESENT REMOTELY: City Attorney Dave Snyder, City Engineer Mark Erichson, Community Development Director Rachel Juba, Finance Director Ron Otkin, Planner Kendra Lindahl PRESENT AT CITY HALL: City Administrator Bryan Bear, City Clerk Michele Lindau Approval of Minutes for the July 6, 2020 City Council Meeting Miron made motion, Haas seconded, to approve the minutes for the City Council meeting held on July 6, 2020, as presented. Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried. Approval of Agenda Petryk made motion, Haas seconded, to approve the agenda as presented. Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried. Presentation of 2019 Audit Report – Jason Miller, Smith Schafer & Associates Jason Miller from the independent accounting firm of Smith Schafer & Associates presented to the Council a recap of the audit of City finances for the 2019 fiscal year. He talked about how they came about their opinion on the financial statement and the procedures they perform in an audit. They issued an unmodified opinion, which is the highest given, meaning they didn’t find any misstatements. There are seven areas they test and found one minor exception in the legal requirement regarding outstanding checks that will need to be reported to the state. Miller reviewed governmental fund revenues stating most revenue comes from property taxes. He next reviewed governmental fund expenditures stating general government, public safety, and highways and street expenditures make up almost 90% of expenditures. He reviewed general fund reserves saying it has been the City’s policy to reserve 50% of the following year’s budgeted expenditures, and the City has exceeded that. He highlighted the importance of having those reserves. He talked about debt service requirements stating there was one more year of large debt payments, and then it dropped significantly. Capital projects expenditures included major projects such as Adelaide Landing Park, electronic equipment upgrades in City Hall, purchase of an aerial truck and plow truck, and street projects including 130th Street. He provided information on enterprise funds that showed positive income. He summarized by saying the information is on the website and a summary of the financial information was published in the City’s official newspaper. Miller and the Council thanked staff for their work.

Minutes

HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING REMOTE MEETING

MONDAY, JULY 20, 2020 – 7 P.M.

Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for July 20, 2020 Page 2 of 6 Hass made motion, Miron seconded, to formally accept the 2019 City Audit as recommended by Finance Director Ron Otkin. Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried. Update on COVID-19 City Response City Administrator Bryan Bear provided an update on how the City was responding to the corona virus pandemic. He stated the City was operating under the Executive Order 20-74 from early June saying not much has changed. He reviewed the City’s Covid-19 Preparedness Plan and talked about how the State of Emergency is allowing the Council and other committees to meet remotely. Special rules would apply if they would like to meet in person. Bear provided information on the CARES Act stating Hugo’s share was $1,148,713.to spend on corona related expense, and it needed to be spent by November 15. The City was documenting expenses and the City Clerk would be contacting Council members to see if they had video conferencing needs. Staff was in process of enhancing the equipment in the Council Chamber to allow for blended meetings, meetings where some attended in person and some remotely. Staff also was investigating installing ionized filters to improve air quality. Election expenses would also be recoverable as well as staff time. Business grants would be discussed after preparing the draft Covid budget for the Council to consider at their August 1, 2020, meeting. Haas talked about the need to provide CARES Act money to local businesses, and he wondered if money could be used to move in the direction of a full time fire employees. He asked staff to look into those items and report back. Miron talked about waiting until the technology was available before doing blended meetings. He also questioned how businesses were operating under the “new normal”. Bear talked about other layers of government that are providing tremendous support including Washington County, who had committed money for small businesses. Miron asked that staff get feedback from local businesses to see if there was an additional need. Council agreed to continue to meet remotely and discuss it further at their next meeting. Consent Agenda Haas made motion, Miron seconded, to approve the following consent agenda:

1. Approve Claims Roster

2. Approve Change Order No. 2 from CB&I for the Water Tower No. 4 Improvement Project

3. Approve Pay Voucher No. 11 from CB&I for Water Tower No. 4 Improvement Project

4. Approve Pay Vouch No. 3 from Peterson Companies, Inc. for Water’s Edge Stormwater Reuse – Phase 2

5. Approve Resolution Terminating TIF District No. 1-2 and Directing County to Decertify

6. Approve Reduction in Letter of Credit for Adelaide Landing 5th Addition

Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for July 20, 2020 Page 3 of 6

7. Approve Board of Trustees Request for Increase in Lump-Sum Pension Approval of Increase in Fire Relief Pension

8. Adopt Feasibility Study for Lions Park Improvement Project Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried. Approve Claims Roster Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Claims Roster as presented. Approve Change Order No. 2 from CB&I for the Water Tower No. 4 Improvement Project WSB recommended approval of Change Order No. 2 for work done by CB&I on the Water Tower No. 4 project. This change order eliminated the water tower’s seepage pit as it is no longer needed based on conditions at the water tower site. Change Order No. 2 also reduced the length of the 18”RCP needed by 25 feet. The associated total reduction in contract price was $5,500. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Change Order No. 2 for work done by CB&I. Approve Pay Voucher No. 11 from CB&I for Water Tower No. 4 Improvement Project CB&I, LLC has submitted Pay Voucher No. 11 for work done on the Water Tower No. 4 Improvement Project certified through July 2, 2020. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved Pay Voucher No.11 in the amount of $49,780.00.

Approve Pay Vouch No.3 from Peterson Companies, Inc. for Water’s Edge Stormwater Reuse – Phase 2 Peterson Companies, Inc. had submitted Pay Voucher No. 3 for work done on the Water’s Edge Stormwater Reuse -Phase 2 project certified through June 30, 2020. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved Pay Voucher No. 3 in the amount of $196,332.47. Approve Resolution Terminating TIF District No. 1-2 and Directing County to Decertify The City’s downtown tax increment district was certified by the county in 2010. Through 2019 this district had not generated any tax increment and there is no outstanding debt or contractual obligations. Minnesota statutes required that this district be decertified. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved RESOLUTION 2020-32 RELATING TO THE TERMINATION OF TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 1-2 AND DIRECTING DECERTIFICATION THEREOF BY THE COUNTY AUDITOR. Approve Reduction in Letter of Credit for Adelaide Landing 5th Addition Adelaide Landing 5th Addition has had significant work completed to date, and the Excelsior Group requested a reduction in the letter of credit. The current letter of credit for the 5th Addition was in the amount of $3,032,318. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the reduction in the letter of credit to $2,192,740 based on the value of work remaining to be completed.

Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for July 20, 2020 Page 4 of 6 Approve Board of Trustees Request for Increase in Lump-Sum Pension The Board of Trustees for the Hugo Firefighter’s Relief Association had formally requested City Council ratification of an increase of $100 per year of service in their lump-sum pension benefit. The Finance Department had reviewed this request and found it to be financially feasible and consistent with the Pension Fiscal Policy adopted in April, 2012. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the ratifying the Board of Trustees’ request for a $100 increase in their lump-sum pension benefit and corresponding change to their by-laws. Adopt Feasibility Study for Lions Park Improvement Project At the City Council meeting of April 20, 2020, a feasibility study of Lions Park was authorized. A master plan for Lions Park was approved on March 2, 2015. The feasibility study revised the master plan for consistency with anticipated residential development and road projects adjacent to the park. A joint Parks Commission and City Council workshop was held on June 29, 2020 to review the updated master plan options and cost estimates. At their July 15, 2020 meeting, the Parks Commission recommended approval of the final master plan and feasibility study for Lions Park. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the final master plan and feasibility study for Lions Park. Resolutions Approving Hugo Gardens Preliminary Plat and PUD Amendment Garden Apartments, LLC, had requested approval for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment and preliminary plat for “Hugo Garden Apartments,” to allow construction of 84 apartment units in seven buildings to be located on the west side of Finale Avenue, south of 147th Street. Planner Kendra Lindahl from Landform explained the number of apartments was reduced from the original PUD approved in 2014, which included the construction of 165 units in three buildings on the site as part of the LaValle Fields plat. The revised plan included a mix of one, two, and three bedroom units for rent. The property was part of LaValle Fields PUD, and Outlot B would be platted as a single lot to accommodate the new apartments. Outlot D will be used for ponding. Apartments are required to comply with the City’s multi-family design guidelines, and Lindahl reviewed the proposed elevations saying staff felt they were well designed and did a nice job of meeting these guidelines. The development was also subject to the Downtown Plan & Design Guidelines that are intended to create pedestrian friendly neighborhoods. They worked to orientate the buildings to Finale Avenue. To accomplish that, the developer was requesting a reduction in the front yard setback from 30 feet to 10 feet. Lindahl talked about the landscape plan and the grading and drainage plan saying they would be working with the developer on a cost share agreement for storm water reuse. An access easement would need to be acquired from the senior housing development to the south in order to comply with fire department and emergency vehicle needs. The developer would be responsible to improve Finale Avenue as a 32 foot wide street to allow for on-street parking and construction of an 8-foot trail on the east side of the street. Staff was still working with the developer to finalize the plans. Park dedication would be in cash in the amount of $87,414.72. There was green space in the project but no private amenities. Lions Park could provide the recreational needs. She stated the plat complied with ordinance requirements, and if the preliminary plat was approved, the next steps would be approval of the final plat, development agreement and an easement vacation.

Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for July 20, 2020 Page 5 of 6 Lindahl provided background of the May 14, 2020, Planning Commission meeting where a public hearing was held on the applications. During the public hearing, a resident came forward and shared concerns about the apartments being within close proximity to the road. The Commissioners generally liked the proposal and agreed the products would be a nice addition to the community. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the resolutions approving the PUD Amendment and Preliminary Plat for “Hugo Garden Apartments.” Mark Margulies with Valerian, LLC, thanked staff for the work they had done on this complicated project. He explained the incomplete items and conditions are known to them, and they have no objections to staff recommendations. He said they were working on access agreements from the adjoining landowner, and he believed they would be in place at time of final plat. He talked about recreational amenities and clarified they would be relying heavily on Lions Park, but there was an opportunity to make use of their green space and possibly use one of the buildings for an indoor gathering space or workout area. He talked about property management explaining it would mostly function as townhomes that require physical maintenance but not hands on management. He explained there would be a good connection with residents. Architect Dean Dovolis, added that every unit had individual entries, no corridors, and attached garages. He said it would make a nice transition from the downtown area with two story buildings that outline the park. Miron made motion, Haas seconded, to approve RESOLUTION 2020-33 APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT FOR “HUGO GARDEN APARTMENTS” (PID 20-031-21-23-0058 AND19-031-21-11-0087) Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried. Miron made motion, Haas seconded, to approve RESOLUTION 2020-34 APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR “HUGO GARDENS” (PID 20-031-21-23-0058) Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried. Resolution Authorizing Preparation of Feasibility Study for 2021 Road Project City Engineer Mark Erichson talked about the previously approved “Hugo Gardens Apartment” and how the developer would be responsible for improvement to Finale Avenue. He explained the remaining streets are identified in the City’s 5-year Capital Improvement Plan for roadway infrastructure, which was approved at the July 6th City Council meeting as part of the City’s overall 5-year Capital Improvement Plan. Next year’s improvement project was identified as the 2021 Downtown Improvement Project and included the extension of 147th Street from Finale Avenue to Oneka Boulevard, reconstruction of 147th Street from just west of TH 61 to Finale Avenue, Flay Avenue north of 147th Street, Upper 146th Street, 146th Street, Finley Avenue, and Fitzgerald Avenue. Coordinating with the Lions Park Improvement efforts, CR 8 Water Reuse Project, and Hugo Gardens was important, and moving forward with the preparation of the feasibility study would be helpful and he recommended approval of the preparation of the feasibility study.

Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for July 20, 2020 Page 6 of 6 Haas made motion, Miron seconded, to approve RESOLUTION 2020-35 ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO ALL OR PORTIONS OF ROADWAYS IDENTIFIED AS THE 2021 DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried. Update on Yellow Ribbon Network Council Member Chuck Haas and Phil Klein reported to Council on the Yellow Ribbon Network activities held recently. Haas showed a photo of a letter from the MN National Guard thanking the Yellow Ribbon for supporting the soldiers during the recent civil strike by providing lunches for 700-800 soldiers. He showed a picture of a mini donut truck owned by realtor Mark Schwope explaining that Mark had been donating a portion of his business proceeds and donut proceeds to the YRN. There were thank you pictures for care packages and donations of 3M Command Hooks and coffee. The YRN helped clean gutters on a soldier’s home, and a crew went to the City of Stacy to help someone move. Schedule Mid-Year Budget Workshop for Week of September 14-18 City Administrator Bryan Bear recommended Council schedule the midyear budget workshop for some time during the week of September 14-18. Miron made motion, Haas seconded, to schedule the Midyear Budget Workshop for Tuesday, September 15, 2020, at 4 p.m. Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried. Adjournment Klein made motion, Haas seconded, to adjourn at 7:55 p.m. Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried. Respectfully Submitted, Michele Lindau City Clerk

�,CITY OF

HUGO 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North, Hugo, MN55038 • (651) 762-6300 • www.ci.hugo.mn.us

TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

DATE:

EST.1906

Honorable Mayor Tom Weidt and Members of the City Council

Ron Otkin, Finance Director

Approve Coronavirus Relief Fund Supplemental Budget

For the City Council Meeting of August 3, 2020

DESIRED COUNCIL ACTION

Approve Resolution Adopting CARES Funding Budget.

BACKGROUND

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) was created because of the sudden decline in

economic output following the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak that significantly altered the fiscal

outlook for state and local governments. The CARES Act was signed into law on March 27, 2020 and created the

Coronavirus Relief Fund (Fund), which provided $150 billion in direct assistance for domestic governments and

stipulated that $139 billion be allocated to state governments based on their populations.

The CARES Act details eligible purposes for which Coronavirus Relief Fund payments may be used. It allows local

governments to make payments for programs that (1) are necessary expenditures incurred due to the public health

emergency with respect to COVID-19; (2) were not accounted for in the budget most recently approved as of the date

of enactment; and (3) were incurred during the period that begins on March 1, 2020 and ends November 15, 2020. The

Department of the Treasury has released guidance and extensive fact sheets which sets forth their interpretation of

these limitations on the permissible use of the Funds.

The Minnesota Legislature failed to pass bill SF 47 that would distribute the Coronavirus Relief Funds to local units of

governments before adjourning their special session. However, on June 25, 2020 Governor Walz announced that he

would distribute $841 million in federal funds to cities, counties, and townships for coronavirus related expenses

through the Legislative Advisory Commission (LAC) process defined in state law. Under the plan, cities with populations

of 200 or more would be eligible to receive a distribution from the Minnesota Department of Revenue of $75.34 per

capita. On June 29, 2020 the City of Hugo submitted the Coronavirus Relief Fund Certification Form to the Minnesota

Department of Revenue certifying our intent to comply with the eligible use parameters outlined in the CARES Act and

requesting distribution of the City's portion of the Coronavirus Relief Funds. On July 7, 2020 the City of Hugo received

$1,148,713.00 in Coronavirus Relief Funds from the Department of Revenue. The City of Hugo has until November 15,

2020 to spend the funds. Any unspent funds must be returned to Washington County for reuse on eligible pandemic

costs.

The Finance Department has spent time researching the issued guidance and fact sheets and using that information has

assembled a proposed supplemental budget that meets the criteria set forth and establishes disbursements of the

Coronavirus Relief Funds. Staff has budgeted for the reimbursement of expenditures made to manage the pandemic

and modifications made at City buildings to allow business to continue safely for Council Members, Commissioners,

employees, and the public.

COVID-19 SMALL BUSINESS RESOURCES

Updated April 6, 2020

Program Agency Eligibility Amount Interest Collateral

Requirements Terms

Deferral Period

Forgivable? Use of Funds Other/Notes

SBA Economic Injury Disaster Loan

Small Business Administration

Small business or non-profit

Up to $2M 3.75%-business 2.75% non-profit

Security Interest in Business

Property

Up to 30 years

Up to 12 months

No, except for $10,000 loan

advance

Fixed debt, payroll, accounts payable, etc. that could have been paid if COVID-19 had not happened. Apply to SBA directly

- Up to 3 to 4 weeks to process application - Apply online - $10,000 cash advance (maximum) - List of supporting financial documents requested - Approval can be based on credit score - Personal Guarantees for loans over $200k - Apply at: https://covid19relief.sba.gov/

SBA Paycheck Protection Program

Small Business Administration

Small business or non-profit

Up to $10M 1% No 2 years Up to 6 months

Yes (for expenses 8 weeks after getting the

loan)

Payroll, Interest on Mortgage, Rent, Utilities. Apply through a SBA approved lender.

- Up to 1 to 2 weeks to process application - Apply through an SBA-Approved Lander - Loan based on 2.5x average monthly payroll - Smoother application process - No Personal Guaranty - Minnesota SBA Approved Lender

Small Business Emergency Loan Program

Minnesota Department of Employment & Economic Development

Small business effected by

Minnesota EO 20-04 and 20-08 that

have been operational for at

least one year

$2500 to $35,000

0%

Be willing to provide

collateral or personal

guarantee up to 20%

Up to 5 years

Up to 6 months

Partial forgiveness

may be available

Funds are available for working capital

-Apply through a non-profit lender (available on DEED’s website) -Must also apply for SBA Economic Injury Disaster Loan assistance at the same time -Are unable to qualify for a loan from a bank or credit union. -Must be current on financial obligations as of March 1, 2020. Apply at: MN DEED Fund

Technical Assistance

Open to Business

Metropolitan Consortium of Community Developers

Current and perspective

entrepreneurs

Free advising and technical assistance on business issues and lending options

Open to Business Website Tyler Hilsabeck [email protected] (612) 789-8838

Small Business Development Center

Small Business Development Center

Small businesses or perspective

Free advising on pre-venture, start-up or established business services

Unemployment and Other Programs

Shared Work Program

Department of Employment and Economic Development

Minnesota businesses

Workers work reduced hours, and the workers are paid unemployment benefits to offset part of their reduced wages.

Helps businesses and employees avoid a layoff while keeping trained staff and increases operations more quickly when conditions improve.

Unemployment Insurance

Department of Employment and Economic Development

Workers unemployed due

to COVID-19 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Unemployed workers should apply online using the schedule set out according to social security number. The waiting period has been waived.

UI tax rate for businesses will not increase if workers collect unemployment benefits

EMERGENCY FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR SMALL BUSINESSES, STARTUPS, AND NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS

Program Type Program NameSelf-employed entrepreneur

Small business and startups

Venture capital-backed startup Nonprofit Details

Where do I apply? Contact Information

Federal grant/loan

SBA Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) and Emergency Grant

Yes Yes * Maybe Yes

Loans Up to $2 million with first payment deferred for 12 months

Emergency Grant of $1,000 per employee up to $10,000

* SBA affiliation rule may preclude some VC-backed startups from qualifying.

Directly with the Small Business Administration

Website: sba.gov/disaster

Email: [email protected]

Phone: 1-800-659-2955 (TTY: 1-800-877-8339)

Federal grant/loan

SBA Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Yes Yes * Maybe Yes

Forgivable loans up 2.5x monthly payroll or $10 million. Loans are forgivable for certain operational expenses paid for in the first 8-weeks after taking out the loan.

* SBA affiliation rule may preclude some VC-backed startups from qualifying.

With a local particpating lender.

Website: sba.gov/funding-programs/loans/coronavirus-relief-options/paycheck-pro-tection-program-ppp

Federal tax program

IRS Employee Retention Credit Yes Yes Yes Yes Program cannot be used if you are

receiving a PPP loan.Directly with the IRS

Website: irs.gov/coronavirus-tax-re-lief-and-economic-impact-payments

Federal tax program

IRS Delay of Payment of Employer Payroll Taxes Yes Yes Yes Yes Program cannot be used if you are

receiving a PPP loan.Directly with the IRS

Website: irs.gov/coronavirus-tax-re-lief-and-economic-impact-payments

Unemployment Insurance

Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) Program Yes Maybe Maybe Yes

Recipient must qualify as a self-employed business owner whose primary source of income is the business they directly operate.

With the state UI office. Website: uimn.org

State loanMinnesota Small Business Loan Guarantee (SBLG) Program

Yes Yes Yes No

80% loan guarantee for loans up to $250,000 made by a qualified economic development lender.

For business with fewer than 250 employees.

With a local particpating lender

Website: mn.gov/deed/business/financing- business/deed-programs/peacetime/sbel-lenders.jsp

State loanMinnesota Small Business Emergency Loan (SBEL) Program

Yes, for businesses affected by

Executive Orders 20-04 and 20-08





NoZero interest loans up to $35,000 through approved lenders to meet expenses.

With a local particpating lender

Wesbite: mn.gov/deed/business/financing- business/deed-programs/loan-guarantee/enrolled-lenders.jsp

State GrantMinnesota Peacetime Emergency Child Care Grants

Yes, for child care providers that remain open.




For child care providers that remain open for the duration of the declared peacetime emergency.

With Childcare Aware Minnesota

Wesbite: childcareawaremn.org/providers/emergency-child-care-grants

Email: [email protected]

Phone: 651-290-9704

https://www.sba.gov/funding-programs/disaster-assistance

mailto:disastercustomerservice%40sba.gov?subject=

https://www.sba.gov/funding-programs/loans/coronavirus-relief-options/paycheck-protection-program-ppp



https://www.irs.gov/coronavirus-tax-relief-and-economic-impact-payments




https://www.uimn.org

mailto:https://mn.gov/deed/business/financing-business/deed-programs/peacetime/?subject=



https://mn.gov/deed/business/financing-business/deed-programs/loan-guarantee/enrolled-lenders.jsp



https://www.childcareawaremn.org/providers/emergency-child-care-grants-2/

https://www.childcareawaremn.org/providers/emergency-child-care-grants-2/

mailto:EmergencyGrants%40childcareawaremn.org?subject=

mailto:EmergencyGrants%40childcareawaremn.org?subject=

1

AUTOMATIC AID/MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF HUGO and LINO LAKES FOR THE DISPATCH AND

USE OF FIRE PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT This Automatic Aid Agreement for use of fire personnel and equipment (“Agreement”) is made and entered into and effective this day of , 2020, by and among the City of Hugo, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Hugo”) and the City of Lino Lakes, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Lino Lakes”) pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes §471.59 which authorizes the joint and cooperative exercise of powers common to the contracting parties. Subject to the terms and conditions hereafter stated and based on the representations, agreements and recitals of the parties herein contained, the parties do hereby agree as follows:

ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS

1.1 Terms. The following terms, unless elsewhere specifically defined herein, shall have the following meanings as set forth below. 1.2 “Party or Parties”. The City of Hugo and the City of Lino Lakes. Parties shall

collectively mean more than one Party. 1.3 “Requesting Official”. The person designated by a Party who is responsible for requesting Assistance from the other Party. 1.4 “Requesting Party”. A Party that requests assistance the other Party, or in the case of

the provision of Automatic Aid, the City where the building/structure fire is located. 1.5 “Responding Official.” The person designated by a Party who is responsible to determine whether and to what extent that Party should provide Assistance to a Requesting Party. 1.6 “Responding Party.” A Party that provides assistance to a Requesting Party. 1.7 “Assistance.” Fire/rescue and/or emergency medical services personnel and equipment. 1.8 “Automatic Aid.” A predetermined response as provided in this Agreement. 1.9 “Fire Protection Area.” The areas shown on the Automatic Mutual Aid Response Map

attached hereto as Exhibit A.

ARTICLE II RECITALS

WHEREAS, the intent of this Agreement is to make fire equipment, personnel and other resources available to the Parties to this Agreement to address fire emergencies; and

2

WHEREAS, the Parties to this Agreement desire to be properly prepared to manage and extinguish fires and handle other emergencies; and WHEREAS, in order to ensure adequate preparations to protect the lives and property within the cities who are parties to this Agreement, the Parties desire to assist each other. NOW THEREFORE, the Parties mutually agree to the joint exercise of police powers by initiating a policy of Automatic Aid with the following conditions:

Section 1. Automatic Assistance. If any Party receives notice of a reported structure or building fire within the Party’s designated Fire Protection Area, the Party will automatically dispatch assistance to the scene of the building or structure fire without first receiving a request from a Requesting Official for assistance. The Responding Party may send any available Fire Department resources to respond to the building or structure fire, in the discretion of the Responding Official, based on the Responding Party’s resource availability. Section 2. Recall of Assistance. The Parties reserve the right to retain equipment, personnel and supplies that may be necessary to protect their own Cities. If an emergency arises within the Responding Party’s Fire Department coverage area, the Responding Official may at any time recall such assistance when in his or her best judgment, or by an order from the governing body of the Responding Party, it is considered to be in the best interest of the Responding Party to do so. Section 3. Command of the Scene. The first Party arriving at the scene of the structure or building fire shall establish command of the scene. Command of the scene may be transferred by agreement of all parties at the scene. Section 4. Workers’ Compensation and Responsibility for Injuries. Each Party shall be responsible for injuries or death of its own personnel. Each Party will maintain workers’ compensation insurance or self-insurance coverage covering its own personnel while they are providing assistance pursuant to this agreement. Each Party waives the right to sue any other Party for any workers’ compensation benefits paid to its own employees or volunteers or their dependents, even if the injuries were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of any other Party or its officers, employees, or volunteers. Section 5. Damage to Equipment. Each Party shall be responsible for damages to or loss of its own equipment and supplies. Each Party waives the right to sue any other Party for any damages to or loss of its equipment or supplies, even if the damages or losses were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of any other Party or its officers, employees, or volunteers. Section 6. Minnesota Municipal Tort Liability Act. For the purposes of the Minnesota Municipal Tort Liability Act (Minn. Stat. 466), the employees, volunteers, and officers of the Responding Party are deemed to be employees (as defined in Minn. Stat. 466.01, subdivision 6) of the Requesting Party, but compensated by the Responding Party.

3

Section 7. Indemnification. The Requesting Party agrees to defend and indemnify the Responding Party against any claims brought or actions filed against the Responding Party or any officer, employee, or volunteer of the Responding Party for injury to, death of, or damage to the property of any third person or persons, arising from the performance and provision of Assistance in responding automatically to a building/structure fire or responding to a request for Assistance by the Requesting Party pursuant to this Agreement. Under no circumstances, however, shall a Party be required to pay on behalf of itself and other Parties, any amounts in excess of the limits on liability established in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 applicable to any one Party. The limits of liability for some or all of the Parties may not be added together to determine the maximum amount of liability for any Party. The intent of this Section is to impose on the Requesting Party limited duty to defend and indemnify a Responding Party for claims arising within the Requesting Party’s jurisdiction subject to the limits of liability under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. The purpose of creating this duty to defend and indemnify is to simplify the defense of claims by eliminating conflicts among defendants, and to permit liability claims against multiple defendants from a single occurrence to be defended by a single attorney. No Party to this Agreement or any officer of any Party shall be liable to any other Party or to any other person for failure of any Party to furnish Assistance to any other Party, or for recalling Assistance, both as described in this Agreement. Section 8. Charges. No charges will be levied by the Responding Party to this Agreement for Assistance rendered to the Requesting Party under the terms of this Agreement unless that Assistance continues for a period of more than 12 hours.

a. If Assistance provided under this agreement continues for more than 12 hours, the Responding Party may submit to the Requesting Party an itemized bill for the cost of any Assistance provided after the initial 12 hour period, including salaries, overtime, materials and supplies and other necessary expenses at the rates established in the most recent Suggested Equipment Standards and Hourly Rates for Fire Departments That Have an Agreement with the Division of Forestry/MN/DNR; and the Requesting Party shall reimburse the Responding Party providing the Assistance for that amount.

b. Such charges are not contingent upon the availability of federal or state government funds. Section 9. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the date executed and shall continue until terminated. Any Party may withdraw from this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other Party to the Agreement. Section 10. Amendments. Any amendments to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by all Parties.

4

Section 11. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, any one of which shall be deemed an original, but when taken together shall constitute one Agreement. Section 12. Binding Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their permitted assigns, and nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer any rights or remedies upon any other persons. Section 13. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the Parties and all representations with respect to Automatic Aid, and supersedes and all prior agreements, correspondence, or memoranda, but does not replace or modify any existing mutual/automatic aid agreements between the Parties and other cities which are not a party to this Agreement.

[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]

5

CITY OF HUGO By: Tom Weidt Its: Mayor Attest: ______________________________ Michele Lindau Its: City Clerk Approved by the City Council of the City of Hugo day of , 2020.

6

CITY OF LINO LAKES By: Its: Mayor Attest: ______________________________ Its: Approved by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes day of , 2018.

7

EXHIBIT A FIRE RESPONSE MAP

Hugo Fire responding to the following areas: RRF1-C, RRF2-B, RRF2-E, RRF2-A, RRF2-C

Lino Lakes Fire responding to the following areas: Hugo FD 1A

9

[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]

S:\Administration\City Council\2020 City Council Meetings\Scans\2020.08.03\01904-610 Summary Hugo CSMP 20200716.docx

70

1 X

EN

IA A

VE

NU

E S

|

SU

ITE

30

0

| M

INN

EA

PO

LIS

, M

N

| 5

54

16

|

76

3.5

41

.48

00

|

WS

BE

NG

.CO

M

Memorandum To: Hugo City Council Bryan Bear, City Administrator Rachel Juba, Community Development Director From: Mark Erichson, City Engineer Kendra Fallon, EIT, WSB Date: July 30, 2020 Re: Hugo Comprehensive Stormwater Management Summary WSB Project No. 01904-610 The Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP) describes and tracks a system of regional volume reduction projects (primarily runoff reuse for irrigation) that generate volume reduction credits, The City of Hugo intends to use these credits in lieu of stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) on select roadway and redevelopment projects. RCWD rules allow stormwater management projects to be implemented off-site of a development or road improvement project, as long as they are in the same Resources of Concern drainage area. The City will use these credits on linear or land development projects where physical constraints do not allow for cost efficient BMP implementation to address volume reduction. Credits from regional volume reduction projects that have been constructed are tracked and made available only within the same Resources of Concern drainage area. The City of Hugo can develop and implement regional projects and apply the water quality credits generated by the projects to future roadway improvements or land development activities. Projects that have already been implemented are included in this document. These generated credits will offset the initial capital cost of these water reuse projects by decreasing the stormwater management costs of future roadway improvement projects. The City can also sell these credits to a developer where onsite stormwater Best Management Practices have difficulty being met onsite. The City of Hugo is a leader in the State of Minnesota for water stewardship and conservation. The City follows a “reduce, reuse and replenish” philosophy, which includes implementing irrigation and infiltration systems that reduce runoff, improve water quality, and replenish groundwater. By replenishing groundwater, Hugo’s regional stormwater reuse systems provide benefits that extend beyond the City and watershed’s stormwater management requirements. Proposed large-scale best management practices will allow the City of Hugo to reduce future runoff volume creating significant benefit to the City, watershed, and the region.

COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

JULY 2020 Prepared for: City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-61


CITY OF HUGO

WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-610


For:

CITY OF HUGO

JULY 2020

Prepared By:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

CITY OF HUGO


Title Sheet

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1

CITY-WIDE VOLUME REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS: CREDIT DEMAND ................................. 2

A. Credit Valuation ................................................................................................................................ 2

B. Public Linear Projects ...................................................................................................................... 2

C. Development and Redevelopment Projects..................................................................................... 3

PROPOSED REGIONAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES: CREDIT SUPPLY ....................... 4

A. Credit Generation and Verification ................................................................................................... 4

1. Project Completion .............................................................................................................. 4

2. Additional Credits & Monitoring ........................................................................................... 4

B. Project Tracking Process ................................................................................................................. 4

C. Planned and Completed Projects .................................................................................................... 5

1. Oneka Ridge Golf Course ................................................................................................... 5

2. Beaver Ponds Park Irrigation Project .................................................................................. 5

3. Wilderness View Water Reuse Project ............................................................................... 5

4. Infiltrate and Irrigate Lions Park .......................................................................................... 6

5. Egg Lake Perimeter Stormwater Reuse System ................................................................ 6

6. Water’s Edge Water Reuse and Irrigation .......................................................................... 6

7. CSAH 8 City Accounts Irrigation project ............................................................................. 6

8. Irrigate Clearwater Creek Park ........................................................................................... 6

9. Irrigate Future Fable Hills Park ........................................................................................... 6

10. Arbre Park Irrigation Project ................................................................................................ 7

11. Val Jean Park Water Re-use Project .................................................................................. 7

12. Irrigate Public Property around Water’s Edge School ........................................................ 7

13. Heritage Pond Park Water Reuse System ......................................................................... 7

14. Oneka Ponds Park Water Reuse System ........................................................................... 7

15. Diamond Point Park Water Reuse System ......................................................................... 7

16. Rice Lake Soccer Fields Water Reuse System .................................................................. 7

17. Hugo Gravel Pit Infiltration System ..................................................................................... 7

18. Harley Sod Field Irrigation Project ...................................................................................... 7

19. Clearwater Cove Irrigation .................................................................................................. 8

20. Oneka Place Development Reuse System ......................................................................... 8

21. Adelaide Landing Development Reuse System ................................................................. 8

CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................. 9

REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 10

LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A – Figures

Appendix B – References

Appendix C – Sequencing Flow Chart


CITY OF HUGO

WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-610 PAGE 1

INTRODUCTION

This Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP) describes a system of regional volume

reduction projects (primarily runoff reuse for irrigation) that generate volume reduction credits, The City of

Hugo intends to use these credits in lieu of stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) on select

roadway and redevelopment projects. The City will use these credits on linear or land development

projects where physical constraints do not allow for cost efficient BMP implementation to address volume

reduction or where planned regional volume reduction practices have been constructed within the same

Resources of Concern (ROCs) drainage area. The City of Hugo can develop and implement regional

projects and apply the volume reduction credits generated by the projects to future roadway

improvements or land development activities.

RCWD rules allow stormwater management projects to be implemented off-site of a development or road

improvement project, as long as they are in the same ROC drainage area. This CSMP describes a

number of projects and the ROC drainage area in which they occur. The projects and their capacity

constitute the supply side of the credit system. The demand side of the credit system is the water quality

improvements needed for Hugo to implement its 2040 land use plan and roadway capital improvement

plan while wanting to maintain a regional approach to volume reduction. Implementing these plans will

result in an increase in impervious surface as development replaces agricultural land.

RCWD requires monitoring to verify the quantity of credits a project can generate. The City may conduct

more monitoring, if desired, to increase the amount of credits. The monitoring procedure is described in

this CSMP.

The City of Hugo is a leader in the State of Minnesota for water stewardship and conservation. The City

follows a “reduce, reuse and replenish” philosophy, which includes implementing irrigation and infiltration

systems that reduce runoff, improve water quality, and replenish groundwater. By replenishing

groundwater, Hugo’s regional stormwater reuse systems provide benefits that extend beyond the City and

watershed’s stormwater management requirements.

Proposed large-scale best management practices will allow the City of Hugo to reduce future runoff

volume creating significant benefit to the City, watershed, and the region.


CITY OF HUGO


CITY-WIDE VOLUME REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS: CREDIT DEMAND

A. Credit Valuation

Using the City of Hugo’s 2040 planned land use and comparing it to 2005 land uses, the water

quality treatment volume required for a full-build out of Hugo is estimated using the RCWD’s Rule

C. Rule C states that 1.1 inch of volume reduction/water quality treatment is required for new or

reconstructed impervious areas for all development and redevelopment projects, with the

exception of Public Linear Projects. For Public Linear Projects, it is anticipated that Rule C will be

updated at the end of 2020 to state that 1.0 inch of volume reduction/water quality treatment is

required for new impervious areas greater than 10,000 square feet. To estimate the increase in

impervious area, a GIS analysis of existing versus future impervious area for each subwatershed

was conducted (Appendix A – Figures 1, 2, and 3).

Based on the Credit Valuation Guide in Appendix B, the City will distribute credits based on BMP

size requirements for the new or reconstructed impervious surface. The required BMP volume

must be calculated using RCWD’s Rule C.

��

0.0540

Development and redevelopment projects that are not city-funded public linear projects must pay

the City for use of volume credits. Based on average construction cost of a typical wet pond BMP

and land value cost in Hugo, each credit shall cost $18,050 (Appendix B). This value may be

reviewed and adjusted as costs fluctuate.

B. Public Linear Projects

Road improvement projects require stormwater management, though the required treatment

volume is less than land development projects. For public linear projects, it is anticipated that

Rule C will be updated at the end of 2020 to state that 1.0 inch of treatment must be provided for

new impervious surfaces greater than 10,000 square feet. The CSMP assumes the 1.0 inch for

public linear projects will be adopted by RCWD and applies that standard.

The annual reuse treatment volume required was calculated by assuming that the standards for

public and private development capture 19.87 inches and 20.38 inches of rainfall annually,

respectively. In other words, capturing 1.0 inch off of impervious for each rainfall event—as is

required for public linear projects—is comparable to using 19.87 inches of stormwater annually

over the same area. These values were provided by RCWD and dictate the amount of irrigation

required for stormwater reuse projects.

Based on the Credit Valuation Guide in Appendix B, one volume credit (one acre-foot of

irrigation annually) will sufficiently provide stormwater volume control for 0.615 acres of

impervious increase for public linear projects. It is anticipated that approximately 30,000 sf of new

impervious will be created annually from public linear projects, however that number will likely

fluctuate based on the City’s CIP needs.


CITY OF HUGO


C. Development and Redevelopment Projects

The intent of the volume credits for development and redevelopment projects is to use credits

when site specific limitations are present and/or where regional reuse projects have been

constructed. Site specific limitations include but are not limited to: potential contamination,

physical limitations, and land use limitations (see Table 1). Based on the Credit Valuation Guide

in Appendix B, one volume credit (one acre-foot of irrigation annually) will sufficiently provide

stormwater volume control for 0.589 acres of impervious area for private development projects.

Development projects that purchase volume credits must still demonstrate compliance with all

other RCWD and City of Hugo rules, including rate control requirements. The applicant must

follow the City’s stormwater sequencing flow chart to determine if purchasing credits is an option

for the site (Appendix C). Priority will be placed on purchasing credits generated from a regional

reuse system downstream that intercepts the runoff volume leaving the project site prior to the

ROC and any other natural waters (ie, streams and wetlands). If that is not possible, then it will

need to be demonstrated that the runoff leaving the site will not cause negative water quality

impacts on any downstream natural waters and/or the ROC. This could be done through water

quality modeling.

Table 1: Potential Site Specific Limitations

Type Specific Project Site Conditions Required Submittals

Potential Contamination

Potential Stormwater Hotspots (PSH) PSH Locations and Flow Paths

Contaminated Soils Documentation of Contamination

Soil Borings

Physical Limitations

Low Permeability Soils *HSG C & D) Soil Borings Bedrock within three vertical feet of

bottom of infiltration area Soil Borings

Seasonal high water table within three vertical feet of bottom of infiltration area

Soils Borings High Water Table

Karst areas Soil Borings

Land Use Limitations Utility Locations Site Map

Nearby Wells (Private and/or Municipal) Well Locations


CITY OF HUGO


PROPOSED REGIONAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES: CREDIT SUPPLY

A. Credit Generation and Verification

RCWD rules currently require that each BMP undergo three years of monitoring for credit

verification. Prior to the monitoring period, an irrigation rate of 0.5 inches per week over the 26-

week growing season may be credited. Additional water quality treatment capacity beyond the 0.5

inches per week may be recognized based on a three-year average of monitoring records of

volume irrigated. This document allows the City to receive credit for the projects in this report as

well as any future projects under the following monitoring schedule.

1. Project Completion

Upon substantial completion (project construction completion, the irrigation surface has

been graded, and seeding placed and the irrigation system is functional), the City will

receive all allowable credits. The City may then use the credits towards public or private

developments as it sees fit. The credits received at this time are irrevocable.

2. Additional Credits & Monitoring

If the City decides that it desires more credits than the RCWD allowable volume on any

given project, it may undergo additional monitoring. The City will notify RCWD that

monitoring of the system is being done and at least three years of irrigation volume

records will be required. The annual volume pulled from the reuse pond for irrigation

would be divided by the number of weeks the system was running and the area irrigated

to get a weekly rate (in/wk) of irrigation. This would be done for the three or more years of

irrigation monitoring data available. The updated number of credits for the reuse system

would be the average irrigation rate over the average length of time the system was

being used for irrigation. Wet periods that exceed the recent statistical average may

reduce the need for irrigation during the monitoring period. The City can request an

extension of the monitoring period if the initial monitoring period is characterized by

significantly above or below average precipitation.

B. Project Tracking Process

The estimated volume reduction for each irrigation project is calculated using the total irrigated

area and applying RCWD’s allowable irrigation depth of 0.5 inches applied weekly for a 26-week

irrigation season. Allowable irrigation volumes will be verified in accordance with RCWD rules by

preparing the Metropolitan Council Stormwater Reuse Guide “Water Balance Tool – Irrigation

Constant Demand” spreadsheet to ensure designs have sufficient drainage area, storage and

demand over the growing season. Some of the projects involve infiltration galleries. These

galleries will likely vary in size, but their treatment capacity will be based on the Minimum Impact

Design Standards (MIDS) calculator developed by the MPCA.

The estimates of total volume reduction are given for each project in Section III.C below and are

summarized in Table 2, Appendix B. As projects enter into the design phase or are put on-line,

the credit tracking table will be updated with the actual volume reductions. The City will be

responsible for notifying RCWD that the project is functioning and available for compliance use

and will include the ROC (or ROCs) of the project is in and the volume reduction achieved at that

time.


CITY OF HUGO


The City will keep a running accounting spreadsheet including credits created and credits being

used for development. At the end of the year the City will send the most up to date version of that

spreadsheet to RCWD and RCWD, at its own cost and initiative, may request to review

documents relating to the design, operation, monitoring of any credit generating reuse project, or

any permit using credits from a reuse project for compliance.

Based on direction provided by RCWD volume reduction credits for infiltration BMP projects

where grant funding was received from either RCWD or a different agency will be adjusted based

on the percentage of funding received from an agency. For example, if the total cost for a large

infiltration project was $400,000 and the City received $100,000 in grant funding from RCWD for

the project then only 75% (($400,000 � $100,000)/$400,000) � 75%) of the generated credits

would be available for use. This only applies to volume reduction credits from infiltration BMPs; all

volume reduction credits from water reuse projects will be available for use no matter the funding

source per RCWD.

C. Planned and Completed Projects

In 2011, the City of Hugo outlined 18 potential capital improvement projects designed to improve

water quality within the City. Several of these projects have been initiated and are currently being

designed and some have already been completed. In addition, multiple developments have

implemented their own water reuse systems providing volume reduction above what is required

by RCWD. A map depicting the location of each project listed below is included as Figure 4,

Appendix A.

1. Oneka Ridge Golf Course

The Oneka Ridge Golf Course Infiltration Project completed its first year of operation and

monitoring in 2014. In 2015, the Golf Course used 19.2 acre-feet of stormwater for

irrigation and an additional 2.26 acre-feet of stormwater was infiltrated. It is anticipated

that this system will generally use more water than was used in 2015 because of 2015

being a heavy rainfall year.

2. Beaver Ponds Park Irrigation Project

The Beaver Ponds Park Irrigation Project was completed in 2017 and consists of

pumping water from the existing stormwater pond constructed as part of the Beaver

Ponds Development and replacing and expanding the existing irrigation system with

stormwater. The Metropolitan Council awarded the City with a $50,000 grant to be used

towards the project. The project generates 6 credits based on irrigating 5.5 acres of

green space. Volume reduction credits from this project were generated within the Bald

Eagle Lake ROC drainage area.

3. Wilderness View Water Reuse Project

The Wilderness View Water Reuse Project will consist of pumping water from the RWJD

1 ditch upstream of Fish Lake to allow for stormwater runoff to be used for irrigation

purposes over the Wilderness View Residential Development. It is estimated that this

project will provide an annual volume reduction of eight acre-feet. This project will lead to

water quality improvements in Bald Eagle Lake and RWJD1.


CITY OF HUGO


4. Infiltrate and Irrigate Lions Park

The Lions Park infiltration and irrigation project is currently under design and will consist

of pumping water from the Water’s Edge Development stormwater ponds to Lions Park

for both infiltration and irrigation. It is anticipated that this project will provide a volume

reduction of 35 acre-feet through irrigation and an addition 11 acre-feet through

infiltration. Volume reduction credits from this project will generate credits within the

Hardwood Creek ROC drainage area.

5. Egg Lake Perimeter Stormwater Reuse System

The Egg Lake Stormwater Reuse System project would consist of pumping stormwater

runoff from a perimeter pond constructed around Egg Lake for irrigation purposes in

selected areas. The estimated benefits of this project include an annual volume reduction

of 35 acre-feet. This project will be fully designed when redevelopment projects on the

northwest side of Egg Lake become active. Volume reduction credits from this project will

generate credits within the Egg Lake ROC Drainage Area.

6. Water’s Edge Water Reuse and Irrigation

The Water’s Edge Water Reuse and Irrigation project will consist of pumping water from

selected stormwater ponds within the Water’s Edge Development and using this water for

irrigation purposes. Phase 1 of this project is complete, and Phase 2 is currently in

design/construction. The initial phase of stormwater irrigation included replacing seven

irrigation accounts currently using city water with stormwater. Phase 1 irrigated 25 acres

of green space and Phase 2 is planned to irrigate 61.1 acres, creating a total of 93.3

credits within the Peltier Lake ROC drainage area when both phases are completed.

7. CSAH 8 City Accounts Irrigation project

This project consists of pumping water located north of Frenchman Road and west of

Oneka Parkway North and using it for irrigation purposes. The stormwater will replace

potable water for six irrigation accounts adjacent to County Road 8 and will be used to

irrigate 6.25 acres. The RCWD has awarded the City $150,000 in grants thus far for the

development of this project. The preliminary design for this project is underway, and the

City Council has approved the creation of a finalized water balance model. It is estimated

that, upon implementation, this project will provide 22 acre-feet of volume reduction.

8. Irrigate Clearwater Creek Park

This project consists of pumping water from Clearwater Creek and using it to irrigate an

80 acre park property located west of Fenway Blvd. and south of 140th Street. This

project could be implemented in conjunction with the irrigation project proposed for

Harley Sod Fields (which is located immediately north of this parcel). It is anticipated that

this would provide a volume reduction of up to 170 acre-feet annually.

9. Irrigate Future Fable Hills Park

This project consists of pumping water from a stormwater pond within the Fable Hills

Development and using the stormwater to irrigate a planned Fable Hills Park located

within the subdivision. The estimated benefits of this project include a volume reduction

of 76 acre-feet.


CITY OF HUGO


10. Arbre Park Irrigation Project

This project consists of pumping water from a pond adjacent to Arbre Park and using this

stormwater for irrigation purposes. It is noted that this park is already being irrigated

using city water. The estimated benefits for this project include a volume reduction of five

acre-feet.

11. Val Jean Park Water Re-use Project

This project consists of pumping water from a stormwater pond located adjacent to Val

Jean Park and using this water to irrigate the park property. This park is already irrigated

with city water. If implemented, this project would provide a volume reduction of up to four

acre-feet.

12. Irrigate Public Property around Water’s Edge School

This project consists of pumping water from a nearby pond and irrigating 20.9 acres

within school property with stormwater. It is estimated that this irrigation project could

provide a volume reduction of 45 acre-feet.

13. Heritage Pond Park Water Reuse System

This project consists of irrigating and infiltrating approximately 14.7 acres of park land

using stormwater within Heritage Pond's Park. The estimated benefits for this project

include a volume reduction of 32 acre-feet due to irrigation and an additional three acre-

feet due to infiltration.

14. Oneka Ponds Park Water Reuse System

This project consists of irrigating and infiltrating stormwater in Oneka Ponds Park by

utilizing runoff from the Oneka Ponds Development. The estimated irrigation area is 34

acres of park land and would result in a volume reduction of 84 acre-feet (74 from

irrigation and 10 from infiltration).

15. Diamond Point Park Water Reuse System

This project consists of constructing a water reuse system to irrigate and infiltrate water in

Diamond Point Park. The irrigation area for the project is approximately 12.6 acres, which

would result in an estimated volume reduction of 27 acre-feet annually because of

irrigation, and an additional 14 acre-feet reduction from infiltration.

16. Rice Lake Soccer Fields Water Reuse System

This project consists of irrigating and infiltrating 12 acres of soccer fields and/or City of

Hugo Public Works Garage property with stormwater runoff taken from stormwater ponds

installed as part of the construction of the City of Hugo's Public Works Garage. The

estimated benefits for the project include a volume reduction of 43 acre-feet, of which 26

acre-feet comes from irrigation.

17. Hugo Gravel Pit Infiltration System

This project consists of pumping stormwater runoff from areas adjacent to the gravel pit.

It is anticipated the project will provide a volume reduction of 27 acre-feet.

18. Harley Sod Field Irrigation Project

This project consists of pumping water from Clearwater Creek to irrigate 100 acres of the

Harley Sod operation located south of Frenchman Road and west of Fenway Avenue.


CITY OF HUGO


The property owner will need to approve of project before it can move to high priority. If

approved, the project will provide an estimated 215 acre-feet volume reduction.

19. Clearwater Cove Irrigation

The project consists of pumping water from stormwater ponds within the Clearwater Cove

development to provide irrigation for the green space within the development. The

irrigation was put in place with the construction of the development in 2016. The

development meets water quality requirements through the dead storage within the

ponds allowing the entirety of the water reuse system to generate credits.

20. Oneka Place Development Reuse System

The project consists of pumping water from stormwater ponds within the Oneka Place

development to provide irrigation for the green space within the development. The

irrigation was put in place with the construction of the development in 2019. A portion of

the volume reduction required by RCWD was provided by the water reuse system so only

the surplus of volume reduction can be used to generate credits.

21. Adelaide Landing Development Reuse System

The project consists of pumping water from stormwater ponds within the Adelaide

Landing development to provide irrigation for the green space within the development.

The irrigation was put in place with the construction of the development in 2018. A portion

of the volume reduction required by RCWD was provided by the water reuse system so

only the surplus of volume reduction can be used to generate credits.


CITY OF HUGO


CONCLUSION

Using this CSMP as a guide, the City of Hugo will construct regional-scale stormwater reuse projects to

decrease groundwater demand for irrigation and improve surface water quality. The regional projects

would be used to provide volume reduction for public linear projects and/or volume reduction required for

private development. The projects described in this CSMP will be achieved on public land or in public-

private partnerships. The granting of credits for infiltration does not release development and linear

projects from meeting other RCWD and City of Hugo rules. If RCWD rules change in the future, the

CSMP may need to be updated to align with the RCWD updated rules.

Credits will be created in two steps:

1) Credits will be received after project construction completion, the irrigation surface has been

graded, and seeding placed and the irrigation system is functional.

2) Additional credits may be received, if the City desires, through extended monitoring.

Once awarded, all volume reduction credits are irrevocable.

The City believes that natural resource management and preservation is an essential component of the

high quality of life in Hugo. Through intelligent stormwater management and water preservation, the City

of Hugo will continue in the pursuit of its goal to “Reduce, Reuse, and Replenish” local water resources.

Future developments will be responsible to submit a proposal to the City first. The application must

document that the proposed land use impervious area are consistent with the Master Plan used in

developing this CSMP. If future developments wish to deviate from the standards outlined in this CSMP, it

is the responsibility of the developer to prepare an application documenting the proposed deviation(s) and

how that difference will be mitigated.

If the development exceeds the CSMP maximum impervious allowed, the application must demonstrate

how the additional runoff will be treated to meet the applicable RCWD rules.


CITY OF HUGO


REFERENCES

Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. (2009). Hardwood Creek Impaired Biota (Fish) and Dissolved Oxygen

TMDL Implementation Plan.

Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. (2011). CMSCWD Multi-Lakes TMDL, October 20, 2011 Draft.

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (2012). Water Quality Data: Surface Water Monitoring Sites and

Data. Available online at http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/water/water-monitoring-and-

reporting/water-quality-and-pollutants/water-quality-data.html. Accessed [2/12/15].

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (2014). Minnesota’s Impaired Waters and TMDLs. Available online at

http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/water/water-types-and-programs/minnesotas-impaired-

waters-and-tmdls/maps-of-minnesotas-impaired-waters-and-tmdls.html. Accessed [2/12/15].

Rice Creek Watershed District (2010). State of the Lakes. Available online at

http://www.ricecreek.org/vertical/sites/%7BF68A5205-A996-4208-96B5-

2C7263C03AA9%7D/uploads/%7B3FC0BE9E-6249-4E48-8247-C7FF6887DE95%7D.PDF.

Accessed [2/12/15].

Rice Creek Watershed District (2017). District Rules. Available online at

http://www.ricecreek.org/vertical/Sites/%7BF68A5205-A996-4208-96B5-

2C7263C03AA9%7D/uploads/RCWD_Rules_approved_12-14-2016_effective_1-1-2017.pdf

Rice Creek Watershed District (2014). Oneka Ridge Golf Course Water Re-Use Irrigation Project.

Available online at http://www.ricecreek.org/index.asp?SEC={31ABD821-A665-4BD3-BD8C-

94D2358D5FE0}&DE={F968FCD9-42ED-4D64-ABD5-B58EB8BF0715}&Type=B_PR. Accessed

[8/8/2014].

Sanja Perica, Deborah Martin, Sandra Pavlovic, Ishani Roy, Michael St. Laurent, Carl Trypaluk, Dale

Unruh, Michael Yekta, Geoffrey Bonnin (2013). NOAA Atlas 14 Volume 8 Version 2, Precipitation-

Frequency Atlas of the United States, Midwestern States. NOAA, National Weather Service,

Silver Spring, MD.

Wenck (2012). Bald Eagle Lake Nutrient TMDL prepared for Rice Creek Watershed District. Available

online at http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/view-document.html?gid=17983. Accessed

[7/31/2014].

Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture.

Web Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database for the Twin Cities Region. Available online

at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed [4/7/2014].

WSB & Associates, Inc. (2018). Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for the City of Hugo,

Minnesota.

COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN APPENDIX

CITY OF HUGO


Appendix A – Figures

£¤61

MN8

MN7

MN4

BaldEagleLake

BaldEagle Lake

Fish Lake

Sunset Lake

Round Lake

Rice Lake

Long Lake

EggLake

PeltierLake

Oneka Lake

HorseshoeLake

Figure 12005 Percent Impervious by Subwatershed

K 0 5,000Feet

May 2020

City BoundaryWMO BoundaryROC Boundary

2005 Percent Impervious0 - 10%10 - 25%25 - 50%Greater than 50%

Docu

ment

Path:

K:\01

904-6

10\G

IS\Ma

ps\H

ugo_

2005

_Impe

rviou

s.mxd

Date:

5/12

/2020

£¤61

MN8

MN7

MN4

BaldEagleLake

BaldEagle Lake

Fish Lake

Sunset Lake

Round Lake

Rice Lake

Long Lake

EggLake

Peltier Lake

Oneka Lake

HorseshoeLake

Figure 2 2040 Estimated Percent Impervious by Subwatershed

K 0 5,000Feet

May 2020


2040 Percent Impervious0 - 10%10 - 25%25 - 50%Greater than 50%

Docu

ment

Path:

K:\01

904-6

10\G

IS\Ma

ps\H

ugo_

2030

_Impe

rviou

s.mxd

Date:

5/12

/2020

£¤61

MN8

MN7

MN4

BaldEagleLake

BaldEagle Lake

Fish Lake

Sunset Lake

Round Lake

Rice Lake

Long Lake

EggLake

Peltier Lake

Oneka Lake

HorseshoeLake

Figure 3Estimated Percent Change in Impervious by Subwatershed

K 0 5,000Feet

May 2020


PercChangeNo Change0 - 10%10 - 25%25 - 50%Greater than 50%

Docu

ment

Path:

K:\01

904-6

10\G

IS\Ma

ps\Fi

gure

3_Hu

go_C

hang

e_In_

Impe

rviou

s.mxd

Date:

5/12

/2020

£¤61

MN8

MN7

MN4

BaldEagleLake

Bald EagleLake

Fish Lake

Sunset Lake

Round Lake

Rice Lake

Long Lake

Egg Lake

PeltierLake

Oneka Lake

HorseshoeLake

2

4 5

3

6

7

8

9

10 11

1213

14

15

16

17

18

1

19

20

21

Figure 4Regional BMP by Resource of Concern Drainage Area

K 0 5,000Feet

May 2020

InDesignPrFuture ProjectIn Use or In DesignCity BoundaryWMO Boundary

Docu

ment

Path:

K:\01

904-6

10\G

IS\Ma

ps\Fi

gure

4_Hu

go_R

OC_P

rojec

ts_05

1220

.mxd

Date:

5/28

/2020

Regional BMPs 1. Oneka Ridge Golf Course 2. Beaver Ponds Park Irrigation/Infiltration Project 3. Wilderness View Water Reuse Project 4. Infiltrate & Irrigate Lions Park 5. Egg Lake Perimeter Stormwater Re-use System 6. Water's Edge Water Re-use/Irrigation 7. County Road 8 Water Re-use System 8. Irrigate Clearwater Creek Park 9. Irrigate Future Fable Hills Park 10. Arbre Park Irrigation Project 11. Val Jean Park Water Re-use Project 12. Irrigate Public Property Around School Within Water's Edge N Subdivision 13. Heritage Pond Park Irrigation System 14. Oneka Ponds Water Re-use System 15. Diamond Point Park Water Re-use System 16. Rice Lake Soccer Fields Water Re-use System 17. Hugo Gral Pit Infiltration System 18. Harley Sod Field Irrigation Project 19. Clearwater Cove Development Irrigation Project 20. Oneka Place Development Reuse System 21. Adelaide Landing Devleopment Reuse System


CITY OF HUGO


Appendix B – References

K:\01904-610\Admin\Docs\2020 Update\Appendix B - References\Credit Valuation Guide_20200611.docx

Value of One Credit:

• The average annual rainfall in Hugo (1980-2009) during the growing season is 23.51 inches.

Non-Linear Projects

• Per Rice Creek Watershed District rules and MPCA performance goals (for non-linear projects),

BMPs should be designed to capture 1.1” of runoff from impervious surfaces1. It is assumed that

rainfall depths over 1.1” would not be captured and wouldn’t be used for irrigation. Based on

rainfall analysis from RCWD approximately 20.38” of rainfall annually could be captured

• Assuming one acre of impervious surface, the amount of runoff that will be captured and

infiltrated each year is as follows:

(1) 1 �� ∗ �.�� ∗ � ��

�� = 1.698 �� /!��

• Therefore, 1.698 credits are generated from capturing the runoff of one new acre of impervious

surface.

• One volume reduction credit is sufficient to cover a non-linear project of 25,650 ft2 of new

impervious surface.

• One credit is equal to 1 acre-foot of infiltration per year.

Equivalence of One Credit:

• The BMP size requirements for one acre of new or reconstructed impervious surfaces are as

follows:

(2) 1 �� ∗ 1.1 "#�ℎ�% ∗ �� = 0.0917 �� (� )*+ ,(-./�

• Capturing runoff from one acre of impervious surface generates 1.698 credits, and 1 acre of new

or reconstructed impervious requires 0.0917 acre feet of BMP capacity. Therefore, the number

of credits required in terms of impervious area can be determined:

(3) .0�1 �� 234

�.50� ��6 �� = 7 �� 234� ��6 �

1 ��8"� = 0.054 �� )*+

• The amount of impervious surface that requires a 0.0540 acre-foot (2,352 ft3) BMP can be

determined using the 1.1” standard for non-linear projects.

Linear Projects

• The same calculations can be done for public linear projects where RCWD requirements state

1.0” of runoff from new impervious surfaces must be captured. Rainfall analysis from RCWD

show 19.87” of rainfall annually could be captured.


(1) 1 �� ∗ �0.�1 �� ∗ � ��

�� = 1.656 �� /!��

• Therefore, 1.656 credits are generated from capturing the runoff of one new acre of impervious

surface.

• One volume reduction credit is sufficient to cover a-linear project of 26,300 ft2 of new

impervious surface.

• One credit is equal to 1 acre-foot of infiltration per year.

Equivalence of One Credit:

• The BMP size requirements for one acre of net new impervious surfaces are as follows:

(2) 1 �� ∗ 1.0 "#�ℎ�% ∗ �� = 0.0833 �� (� )*+ ,(-./�

• Capturing runoff from one acre of impervious surface generates 1.656 credits, and 1 acre of net

new impervious requires 0.0833 acre feet of BMP capacity. Therefore, the number of credits

required in terms of impervious area can be determined:

(3) .�� 234

�.5<5 ��6 �� = 7 �� 234� ��6 �

1 ��8"� = 0.0503 �� )*+

• The amount of impervious surface that requires a 0.0503 acre-foot (2,191 ft3) BMP can be

determined using the 1.0” standard for linear projects.

Determining the Value of One Credit

• By using credits, more of the purchased land can be used towards development. Therefore, the

amount saved by a developer includes both property value and cost of BMP implementation.

• In Hugo, land costs approximately $1.50/square foot2.

• For consistency, a value of 1 acre of impervious surface will be evaluated.

• Using equation two, the BMP required is 0.0917 acre feet, or 4000 cubic feet.

• Standard stormwater ponds average three to four feet in depth for a permanent pool3.

Approximately the same area is commonly needed for live storage. Therefore, the area saved by

utilizing credits is estimated to be 2,300 square feet, or $3500 at $1.50 per square foot:

4000 �.="� �� > 3.5 �� = 1143 %?.�� ∗ 2 �(� -",� %�(��A� = 2,286 %?.��

• Assuming an average of $6.80 per cubic foot3 and multiplying by the required 4000 cubic feet a

BMP of the required size is estimated to cost $27,200.


To summarize:

• The cost of BMP implementation and the land required to manage the runoff from one acre of

impervious is $30,650

$27,200 + E $1.50%?.�� ((� ∗ 2,300 %?.�� F = $30,650

• Approximately 1.698 credits are required to infiltrate the mandated volume for a private

development that creates 1 acre of new impervious surface.

Therefore, the estimated volume reduction credit value is $30,650 ÷ 1.698 = $18,050.

1. Rice Creek Watershed District Rules and MPCA Performance Goals

2. Assuming $1.50/square foot as a city-wide average (Jay Kennedy, PE, WSB & Associates)

3. https://www3.epa.gov/region1/npdes/stormwater/ma/green-infrastructure-stormwater-bmp-cost-

estimation.pdf

Regional BMP Area Irrigated (ac)

Anticipated Credits

when System Online

(Based on

0.5"/week)

Additional Credits

after 3 years of

Monitor Data Credits Used

Date of Project

Completion Resource

Arbre Park Irrigation 2.2 2.4 0 0 - - - Peltier Lake

Beaver Ponds Park Irrigation/Infiltration 5.5 6 0 0 6 100% July 2017 Bald Eagle Lake

Clearwater Cove Irrigation 16.3 17.7 0 0 17.7 100% November 2016 Peltier Lake

Clearwater Creek Park Irrigation 79 85.6 0 0 - - - Peltier Lake

CSAH 8 Irrigation 6.3 6.8 0 0 - - Anticipated 2021 Peltier Lake

Diamond Point Park Water Re-Use System 12.6 13.7 0 0 - - - Rice Lake

Egg Lake Perimeter Stormwater Re-Use System 16.4 17.8 0 0 - - - Egg Lake

Fable Hills Park Irrigation 35.2 38.1 0 0 - - - Peltier Lake

Harley Sod Field Irrigation 100 108.3 0 0 - - - Peltier Lake

Heritage Pond Park Irrigation 14.7 15.9 0 0 - - - Peltier Lake

Hugo Gravel Pit Infiltration System 10 10.8 0 0 - - - Peltier Lake

Lions Park Infiltration/Irrigation 16 17.3 0 0 - - - Peltier Lake

Oneka Ponds Water Re-Use System 34 36.8 0 0 - - - Oneka Lake/Peltier Lake

Oneka Ridge Golf Course (Bald Eagle Lake ROC)** 150* 47.5 0 0 47.5 100% November 2014 Bald Eagle Lake

Oneka Ridge Golf Course (Peltier Lake ROC)** 150* 2.5 0 0 2.5 100% November 2014 Peltier Lake

Rice Lake Soccer Fields Water Re-Use System 12 13 0 0 - - - Rice Lake

Val Jean Park Water Re-Use 1.8 2 0 0 - - - Peltier Lake

Water's Edge Irrigation 25 27.1 0 0 27.1 100% November 2017 Peltier Lake

Water's Edge North Subdivision 61.1 66.2 0 0 - - In Construction 2020 Peltier Lake

Wilderness View Water Reuse 3.5 3.8 0 0 - - - Bald Eagle Lake

Adelaide Landing Development Irrigation 58.7* 34.6 0 0 34.6 100% June 2018 Peltier Lake

Oneka Place Development Irrigation 23.6* 4.2 0 0 4.2 100% May 2019 Peltier Lake

*Some projects use the reuse system to meet water quality requirements. In these cases only the surplus of the volume reduction can be used to generate credits.

**Some projects span multiple ROC subwatersheds. Credits were split based on irrigated area within each ROC subwatershed

Remaining

TABLE 2 CITY OF HUGO REGIONAL BMP SUMMARY


CITY OF HUGO


Appendix C – Flow Chart

Can volume control be provided on-site

or has it been planned for regionally?

On-Site Infiltration (must be considered first)

Water quality treatment

volume provided:

______________

% Met: ___________

On-Site Water Reuse

Water quality treatment volume

provided: ____________

% Met: ___________

Volume credits may be

purchased from the City as

available from a regionally

planned reuse project

within the same Resource

of Concern

Can a different stormwater

BMP be located onsite to

provide water quality

treatment?

Stormwater Ponds


provided: ____________

% Met: ___________

Filtration/Biofiltration


provided: _____________

% Met: ____________

Can stormwater BMPs be located in a

downstream location that intercepts the

runoff volume leaving the project site

prior to the ROC?

Can stormwater BMPs be located

anywhere within the same ROC

Drainage Area that results in no

greater mass of Total Phosphorus

reaching the resource of concern

than on-site BMPs?

Volume credits may be

purchased from the City as

available within the same

Resource of Concern

Required water quality treatment volume from BMP selection

(show calculation):

Has the water quality treatment volume requirement been 100%

met?

If requirement is not 100% met, revise BMP design or apply for

RCWD Stormwater Variance.

Yes No

NO

YE

S

NO

YE

S


provided: __________

% Met: __________


provided: __________

% Met: __________

NO

YES

Begin HereProject Name: ________________

WSB Project #: ________________

Reviewed By: _________________

ROC: Resource of Concern

BMP: Best Management Practice

RCWD: Rice Creek Watershed District

NO

YES

RESOLUTION NO. ______

CITY OF HUGO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA

A RESOLUTION

APPROVING THE CITY OF HUGO COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

WHEREAS, the City of Hugo is a leader in the state of Minnesota for water stewardship and conservation and follows a reduce, reuse, and replenish philosophy; and WHEREAS, The Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan describes and tracks a system of regional water reduction projects (primarily runoff reuse for irrigation) that generate volume reduction credits; and WHEREAS, the City can use these credits generated for local road improvement projects or development projects in lieu of stormwater Best Management Practices as long as they are in the same Resources of Concern drainage area; and WHEREAS, The City can use these credits for local improvement projects or sell these credits to a developer where stormwater Best Management Practices have difficulty being met onsite; and WHEREAS, Rice Creek Watershed District has reviewed and been a part of the development of this plan. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUGO, MINNESOTA: That the City of Hugo Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan is hereby approved. This resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Hugo on the 3rd day of August, 2020, by a vote of Ayes and Nays. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk (seal)

1 7/30/2020 1:22 PMHugo City Council

Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa1

2 3 4 5 6 7 89 10 11 12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20 21 2223 24 25 26 27 28 2930 31

August 2020Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa

1 2 3 4 56 7 8 9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 1920 21 22 23 24 25 2627 28 29 30

September 2020August 2020

Jul 26 27 28 29 30 31 Aug 1Filing for Candidacy

2 3 4 5 6 7 8Filing for Candidacy

7:00pm Council Meets

9 10 11 12 13 14 155:00pmFiling for Candidacy

7:00am Primary Election6:30pm BOZA7:00pm Planning Comm

16 17 18 19 20 21 227:00pm Council Meets 5:00pm EDA

6:30pm Hist. Comm.7:00pm Parks Comm

23 24 25 26 27 28 295:00pm Burger Night

(Legion)6:30pm BOZA7:00pm Planning Comm

30 31 Sep 1 2 3 4 5

SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY

2 7/30/2020 1:22 PMHugo City Council

Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 1213 14 15 16 17 18 1920 21 22 23 24 25 2627 28 29 30

September 2020Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa

1 2 34 5 6 7 8 9 10

11 12 13 14 15 16 1718 19 20 21 22 23 2425 26 27 28 29 30 31

October 2020September 2020

Aug 30 31 Sep 1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12Labor Day (United

States)7:00pm Council Meets

6:30pm BOZA7:00pm Planning Comm

13 14 15 16 17 18 195:00pm EDA6:30pm Hist. Comm.

7:00pm Parks Comm

20 21 22 23 24 25 267:00pm Council Meets 5:00pm Burger Night

(Legion)6:30pm BOZA7:00pm Planning Comm

27 28 29 30 Oct 1 2 3

SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY

agenda - city of hugobed5c6a0... · 8/3/2020 · j.1 approve comprehensive stormwater management...

Documents