afghanistan water, sanitation and hygiene (wash) dry ......ththhihjh wash dry spell assessment, june...

ththhihjh

WASH Dry Spell Assessment, June 2018

Informing

more effective humanitarian actionREACH1

Quarterly IDP Camp Directory, April 2016

AFGHANISTAN

JUNE 2018

Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) Dry Spell Assessment

Informing

more effectivehumanitarian actionREACH

ththhihjh


Informing


About REACH REACH is a joint initiative of two international non-governmental organizations - ACTED and IMPACT Initiatives - and the UN Operational Satellite Applications Programme (UNOSAT). REACH aims to strengthen evidence-based decision making by aid actors through efficient data collection, management and analysis before, during and after an emergency. By doing so, REACH contributes to ensuring that communities affected by emergencies receive the support they need. All REACH activities are conducted in support to and within the framework of inter-agency aid coordination mechanisms. For more information please visit our website: www.reach-initiative.org. You can contact us directly at: [email protected] and follow us on Twitter @REACH_info.

Cover photo: A drying river in Panjshir, Afghanistan © REACH, March 2018

ththhihjh


Informing


ContentsBackground .......................................................................................................................................................... 6

Rationale & Objectives ...................................................................................................................................... 6

Methodology......................................................................................................................................................... 6

Other WASH Assessments in ISETs.................................................................................................................... 6

Research Questions............................................................................................................................................. 7

Limitations............................................................................................................................................................ 7

Key Reported Figures & Findings....................................................................................................................... 7

Comparative Overview by District...................................................................................................................... 8

1. Badghis Province........................................................................................................................................... 10

Abkamari District............................................................................................................................................... 11

Ghormach District..............................................................................................................................................

Muqur (Badghis) District .................................................................................................................................

Murghab District................................................................................................................................................

Qadis District......................................................................................................................................................

Qala e Naw District...........................................................................................................................................

2. Balkh Province................................................................................................................................................

Charbulak District.............................................................................................................................................

Charkent District................................................................................................................................................

Chemtal District.................................................................................................................................................

Dawlatabad (Balkh) District..............................................................................................................................

Dehdadi District.................................................................................................................................................

Keshendeh District............................................................................................................................................

Khulm District....................................................................................................................................................

Mazar e Sharif District.....................................................................................................................................

Nahr e Shahi District.........................................................................................................................................

Sholgareh District.............................................................................................................................................

Zari District.........................................................................................................................................................

3. Daykundi Province..........................................................................................................................................

Ashtarlay District...............................................................................................................................................

Giti District..........................................................................................................................................................

Kajran District....................................................................................................................................................

Khadir District.................................................................................................................................................... Miramor District................................................................................................................................................ Nili District......................................................................................................................................................... Sang e Takht District........................................................................................................................................ Sharestan District..............................................................................................................................................

ththhihjh


Informing


4. Farah Province.................................................................................................................................................

Anardara District................................................................................................................................................

Balabuluk District..............................................................................................................................................

Farah District......................................................................................................................................................

Pushtrod District................................................................................................................................................

5. Faryab Province..............................................................................................................................................

Almar District.....................................................................................................................................................

Andkhoy District................................................................................................................................................

Dawlatabad District...........................................................................................................................................

Khani Char Bagh District..................................................................................................................................

Maymana District..............................................................................................................................................

Pashtunkot District............................................................................................................................................

Qaramqol District..............................................................................................................................................

Qaysar District....................................................................................................................................................

Shirintagab District...........................................................................................................................................

6. Hilmand Province...........................................................................................................................................

Garmser District.................................................................................................................................................

Lashkar Gah District..........................................................................................................................................

Marja District.....................................................................................................................................................

Nad e Ali District...............................................................................................................................................

Nahr e Saraj District..........................................................................................................................................

Nawa e Barakzaiy District................................................................................................................................

7. Jawjan Province..............................................................................................................................................

Aqcha District....................................................................................................................................................

Fayzabad (Jawzjan) District..............................................................................................................................

Khanaqah District..............................................................................................................................................

Khwaja du Koh District..................................................................................................................................... Mardyan District................................................................................................................................................ Mingajik District................................................................................................................................................ Qushtepa District............................................................................................................................................... Shiberghan District...........................................................................................................................................

8. Nimroz Province..............................................................................................................................................

Chakhansur District...........................................................................................................................................

Charburjak District............................................................................................................................................

Delaram District.................................................................................................................................................

Khashrod District...............................................................................................................................................

Zaranj District....................................................................................................................................................

ththhihjh


Informing


9. Saripul Province............................................................................................................................................. X

Gosfandi District................................................................................................................................................

Sancharak District.............................................................................................................................................

Saripul District ..................................................................................................................................................

Sayad District.....................................................................................................................................................

Sozmaqala District............................................................................................................................................

10. Uruzgan Province.........................................................................................................................................

Chora District.....................................................................................................................................................

Dehrawud District..............................................................................................................................................

Gizab Uruzgan District .....................................................................................................................................

Shahid e Hassas District.................................................................................................................................

Tirinkot District..................................................................................................................................................

ththhihjh


Informing


Winter in Afghanistan is a critical period for securing successful food production and agricultural inputs for the entire year, as well as for replenishing groundwater aquifers. Compared to national multi-year averages, the winter season for 2017/2018 has been uncharacteristically dry, with below average snowfall and a precipitation deficit of up to 70%. This dry spell has affected access to livelihoods, in particular for communities relying on agriculture, and availability of water in the following months, as reported by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). As a result, the dry spell has compounded the vulnerability of large shares of the Afghan population, leading to a mobilisation of humanitarian actors to support the most affected population. However, limited information is available to identify vulnerable communities and areas most affected by the dry spell, especially with regards to Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) concerns.

To address this information gap, REACH conducted a WASH Cluster assessment between 3 and 21 June 2018 aiming to inform the response of the Cluster for the ongoing dry spell in Afghanistan. In particular, this assessment sought to identify:

• How population groups have been affected differently by the dry spell. REACH specifically focused on urban and rural areas, Informal Settlements (ISETs) and Community Development Councils (CDCs) .• Which areas are most affected by the dry spell, to inform geographic prioritization at the district level, beyond the initial provincial-level prioritization method (see below).• The main coping mechanisms used by households to mitigate the impact of the dry spell.• The preferred modalities of response for different population groups.

Context and RationaleThe assessment focused on the 10 provinces prioritized by the WASH Cluster, where more than 25% of water sourcess have already dried or are drying as a result of the 2018 winter dry spell. Within these provinces, vulnerable locations were purposively selected across all 67 districts. All identified ISETs were included in this assessment, as access to WASH resources are traditionally limited there, while only the most vulnerable CDCs, both urban and rural, were included following a profiling exercise by WASH partners.

One Key Informant (KI) was interviewed in each community (understood as either an ISET or a CDC), using a structured questionnaire designed in collaboration with the WASH Cluster. KIs were knowledgeable community members, such as leaders, teachers and elders, identified by enumerators. Findings were then aggregated at district and province level.

In addition, Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were conducted to supplement and triangulate findings from the KI interviews. Two FGDs, one with female respondents and one with male respondents, were conducted in each province with six to eight participants in each. Participants were selected by approaching pre-existing networks of KIs and snowballing among their connections, aiming for a widespread of areas of origins. Findings from the FGDs were not used in these factsheets but will be used in the Executive Summary (forthcoming).

Methodology

1. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), Afghanistan Drought Contingency Plan, April 2018. 2. FAO, Rapid Assessment of the 2018 Winter Dry Spell in Afghanistan, 2018.3. Communities with at least 50% of displaced people and no legal rights to occupy the land.4. Communities in which a democratically elected body operate to strengthen the local governance and social development of the inhabitants. ISETs are not represented in these elected bodies and are thus not included in CDCs. 5. WASH Cluster, WASH Dry Spell Contingency Plan, March 2018.6. WASH Cluster, internal document.

ththhihjh


Informing


Research QuestionsIn order to meet aforementioned objectives, this dry spell assessment attempted to answer the following research questions, designed in close collaboration with the WASH Cluster:

• What are the districts that have been more impacted by the 2018 winter dry spell?• How has the dry spell affected population groups differently within the community, inclusive of men, women, boys and girls, as well as those dependent on agriculture or livelihoods, and in urban and rural settings? • What are the preferred modalities of assistance in the different dry-spell affected settings?• What are the current and expected coping strategies used by affected households to mitigate the implications of the dry spell?

Limitations• Findings are based on the knowledge of KIs providing information on their communities. Findings should therefore be considered indicative only.• The geographical areas included in this assessment were selected by the WASH cluster based on the proportion of drying water sources in March 2018. Other affected, but not selected, areas might be missing from this assessment. • Since data was collected at community level, and is shown at the district-level, it cannot be used for direct beneficiary selection. The findings from this assessment can be used to prioritise locations and population groups, and should be completed by beneficiary selection data collection. • Given the society structure and cultural barriers found in Afghanistan, the number of female KIs was very low, thus female-specific issues can be under-represented.

Key Reported Figures and Findings

Total # ISETs assessed: 454Est. # HHs in ISETs: 108,399

85+13+2+t 66+27+7+tYes85% 66%

2% 7%

Proportion of communities where worsened health concerns due to the dry spell were reported:

Cash assistance

Main types of emergency WASH assistance preferred by communities to cope with the dry spell:

CDCs:Dig wells

Support the quality of water

ISETs:1

2

3

Cash assistanceDig wells

Tankered water

CDCs:ISETs:

Proportion of communities where a change in the main water source used before and after the dry spell was reported:

Do not know

CDCs:ISETs:

Proportion of communities where worsened health concerns due to the dry spell were reported:

Tankered water

Main types of emergency WASH assistance preferred by communities to cope with the dry spell:

Urban:Dig wells

Cash assistance

Rural:1

2

3

Tankered waterDig wells

Cash assistance

Proportion of communities where a change in the main water source used before and after the dry spell was reported:

Total # CDCs assessed: 704Est. # HHs in CDCs: 241,887

Total # Rural Areas: 722Est. # Rural HHs: 204,187

Total # Urban Areas: 234Est. # Urban HHs: 146,099

29+71+t 16+84+tNo change29% 16%

71% 84%Change

Urban:Rural:

15+85+t 31+69+tChange15% 31%

85% 69%No change

68+26+6+t 82+16+2+t68% 82%

6% 2%

Urban:Rural:

No13% 27%

Yes

Don’t knowNo26% 16%In addition to this booklet, more information on the WASH needs

and vulnerabilities of ISET residents, can be found in the WASH and Emergency Shelter Non-Food Items (ESNFI) Needs Assessment Report (November 2017) carried out by REACH and its partners, or in the following regional factsheets:• Central Region WASH, ESNFI and FSAC needs in ISETs• North Region WASH, ESNFI and FSAC needs in ISETs• West Region WASH, ESNFI and FSAC needs in ISETs• South-East Region WASH, ESNFI and FSAC needs in ISETs

Other WASH Assessments in ISETs

ththhihjh


Informing


Comparative Overview by District

Summary WASH Livelihoods Health Coping strategies Assistance

Prov

inces

Distr

icts

Total

estim

ated n

umbe

r of h

ouse

holds

s in

CDCs

Totta

l esti

mated

numb

er of

hous

ehold

s in I

SETs

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re a

chan

ge in

the m

ain w

ater s

ource

used

befor

e and

aft

er th

e dry

spell

was

repo

rted

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re po

pulat

ion gr

oups

have

not e

quall

y red

uced

their

wa

ter co

nsum

ption

sinc

e the

begin

ning o

f the d

ry sp

ell

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re a

decre

ase o

f the e

cono

mic w

ell-b

eing w

as re

porte

d as

a re

sult o

f the d

ry sp

ell

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

are r

epor

tedly

depe

nden

t on

agric

ultur

e

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re cr

op de

ath as

a re

sult o

f the d

ry sp

ell w

as re

porte

d, of

comm

unitie

s with

at le

ast s

ome m

embe

rs de

pend

ent o

n agr

icultu

re

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

are r

epor

tedly

depe

nden

t on

lives

tock

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re liv

eliho

od de

ath as

a re

sult o

f the d

ry sp

ell w

as

repo

rted,

of co

mmun

ities w

ith at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

depe

nden

t on l

ivesto

ck

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re w

orse

ned h

ealth

conc

erns

due t

o the

dry s

pell w

ere

repo

rted

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re m

embe

rs we

re re

porte

d to a

ctive

ly us

e cop

ing

strate

gies t

o dea

l with

a lac

k of w

ater

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

trave

lled m

ore t

han 1

km to

fet

ch w

ater, o

f com

munit

ies ac

tively

using

copin

g stra

tegies

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

used

unpr

otecte

d wate

r so

urce

s, of

comm

unitie

s acti

vely

using

copin

g stra

tegies

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

used

less

than

5L of

wate

r/pe

rs/da

y, of

comm

unitie

s acti

vely

using

copin

g stra

tegies

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

move

d to a

nothe

r loca

tion

to se

ek w

ater, o

f com

munit

ies ac

tively

using

copin

g stra

tegies

% of

comm

unitie

s hav

ing re

porte

dly re

ceive

d any

huma

nitar

ian as

sistan

ce in

the

six m

onths

prior

to da

ta co

llecti

on

% of

comm

unitie

s rep

orted

ly fac

ing ba

rrier

s to r

eceiv

ing as

sistan

ce

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re ta

nker

ed w

ater w

as re

porte

d as a

n eme

rgen

cy

WAS

H ne

eds

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re ca

sh as

sistan

ce w

as re

porte

d as a

n eme

rgen

cy

WAS

H ne

ed

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re se

mi-p

erma

nent

wells

wer

e rep

orted

as an

em

erge

ncy W

ASH

need

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re w

ater t

reatm

ent w

as re

porte

d as a

n eme

rgen

cy

WAS

H ne

ed

Badghis 29943 4719 3% 0% 100% 99% 83% 100% 89% 14% 38% 69% 39% 3% 0% 49% 4% 6% 85% 9% 0%

Abkamari 2857 200 0% 0% 100% 100% 94% 100% 94% 6% 13% 100% 100% 0% 0% 69% 0% 6% 94% 0% 0%

Ghormach N/A 250 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0%

Muqur (Badghis) 3911 312 5% 0% 100% 100% 71% 100% 95% 0% 33% 86% 29% 0% 0% 52% 0% 0% 95% 5% 0%

Murghab 15184 N/A 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 18% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0%

Qadis 2860 120 0% 0% 100% 100% 94% 100% 100% 6% 63% 80% 40% 0% 0% 13% 13% 0% 94% 6% 0%

Qala e Naw 5131 3837 7% 0% 100% 97% 71% 100% 76% 34% 48% 50% 43% 2% 0% 76% 7% 17% 66% 17% 0%

Balkh 25727 28008 25% 5% 100% 66% 64% 76% 30% 80% 93% 80% 59% 25% 16% 5% 26% 18% 4% 71% 6%

Charbulak 2395 N/A 0% 0% 100% 100% 44% 100% 22% 89% 100% 67% 89% 1% 0% 0% 67% 0% 0% 100% 0%

Charkent 1893 N/A 0% 0% 100% 100% 64% 100% 29% 64% 100% 100% 100% 1% 50% 0% 36% 57% 0% 43% 0%

Chemtal 9253 N/A 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 3% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0%

Dawlatabad 2322 N/A 0% 29% 100% 100% 100% 100% 57% 100% 100% 14% 100% 0% 0% 0% 14% 0% 0% 100% 0%

Dehdadi N/A 5002 61% 0% 100% 78% 21% 78% 21% 78% 83% 53% 40% 2% 7% 17% 17% 17% 0% 83% 0%

Keshendeh 5539 N/A 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 33% 100% 100% 67% 100% 1% 22% 0% 22% 44% 33% 22% 0%

Khulm 1457 N/A 0% 0% 100% 85% 45% 92% 0% 62% 92% 92% 8% 2% 33% 23% 62% 0% 8% 92% 0%

Mazar e Sharif N/A 11932 61% 11% 100% 28% 54% 57% 58% 76% 91% 83% 17% 4% 5% 2% 11% 4% 0% 76% 17%

Nahr e Shahi N/A 11074 13% 3% 100% 30% 22% 47% 7% 83% 90% 85% 70% 7% 4% 7% 7% 0% 0% 97% 3%

Sholgareh 1178 N/A 0% 0% 100% 100% 88% 100% 0% 50% 88% 100% 100% 2% 71% 0% 100% 13% 25% 38% 25%

Zari 1690 N/A 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 25% 100% 100% 88% 63% 1% 50% 0% 63% 13% 13% 75% 0%

Daykundi 27178 6766 2% 85% 100% 99% 79% 99% 4% 99% 90% 6% 1% 35% 0% 10% 77% 48% 0% 52% 0%

Ashtarlay 1242 455 0% 100% 100% 100% 79% 100% 0% 100% 93% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 71% 64% 0% 36% 0%

Giti 15381 N/A 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% 100% 42% 0% 2% 0% 0% 100% 17% 0% 83% 0%

Kajran 910 424 0% 94% 100% 100% 94% 100% 6% 100% 94% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 94% 82% 0% 18% 0%

Khadir 950 N/A 0% 88% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% 88% 29% 0% 1% 0% 0% 100% 25% 0% 75% 0%

Miramor 879 483 0% 100% 100% 100% 93% 100% 0% 100% 93% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 100% 40% 0% 60% 0%

Nili 1557 3037 7% 63% 100% 93% 57% 97% 10% 100% 87% 0% 4% 7% 0% 47% 33% 30% 0% 70% 0%

Sang e Takht 1799 85 0% 90% 100% 100% 80% 100% 0% 90% 100% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 90% 40% 0% 60% 0%

Shahrestan 4460 2282 3% 81% 100% 100% 70% 100% 3% 97% 81% 3% 0% 9% 0% 0% 81% 62% 0% 38% 0%

Farah 14293 10580 28% 39% 97% 82% 16% 73% 23% 84% 13% 19% 0% 4% 6% 29% 24% 24% 0% 75% 1%

Anardara 1080 N/A 0% 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 0% 89% 0% 11% 0%

Balabuluk 910 N/A 0% 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 0% 67% 0% 33% 0%

Farah 11703 10580 31% 35% 96% 78% 13% 68% 19% 90% 16% 19% 0% 4% 6% 35% 26% 19% 0% 80% 1%

Pushtrod 600 N/A 29% 0% 100% 100% 86% 100% 100% 100% 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 43% 0% 0% 100% 0%

ththhihjh


Informing




Prov

inces

Distr

icts

Total

estim

ated n

umbe

r of h

ouse

holds

s in

CDCs

Totta

l esti

mated

numb

er of

hous

ehold

s in I

SETs

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re a

chan

ge in

the m

ain w

ater s

ource

used

befor

e and

aft

er th

e dry

spell

was

repo

rted

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re po

pulat

ion gr

oups

have

not e

quall

y red

uced

their

wa

ter co

nsum

ption

sinc

e the

begin

ning o

f the d

ry sp

ell

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re a

decre

ase o

f the e

cono

mic w

ell-b

eing w

as

repo

rted a

s a re

sult o

f the d

ry sp

ell

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

are r

epor

tedly

depe

nden

t on

agric

ultur

e

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re cr

op de

ath as

a re

sult o

f the d

ry sp

ell w

as re

porte

d, of

comm

unitie

s with

at le

ast s

ome m

embe

rs de

pend

ent o

n agr

icultu

re

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

are r

epor

tedly

depe

nden

t on

lives

tock

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re liv

eliho

od de

ath as

a re

sult o

f the d

ry sp

ell w

as

repo

rted,

of co

mmun

ities w

ith at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

depe

nden

t on l

ivesto

ck

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re w

orse

ned h

ealth

conc

erns

due t

o the

dry s

pell

were

repo

rted

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re m

embe

rs we

re re

porte

d to a

ctive

ly us

e cop

ing

strate

gies t

o dea

l with

a lac

k of w

ater

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

trave

lled m

ore t

han 1

km to

fet

ch w

ater, o

f com

munit

ies ac

tively

using

copin

g stra

tegies

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

used

unpr

otecte

d wate

r so

urce

s, of

comm

unitie

s acti

vely

using

copin

g stra

tegies

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

used

less

than

5L of

wate

r/pe

rs/da

y, of

comm

unitie

s acti

vely

using

copin

g stra

tegies

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

move

d to a

nothe

r loca

tion

to se

ek w

ater, o

f com

munit

ies ac

tively

using

copin

g stra

tegies

% of

comm

unitie

s hav

ing re

porte

dly re

ceive

d any

huma

nitar

ian as

sistan

ce in

the

six m

onths

prior

to da

ta co

llecti

on

% of

comm

unitie

s rep

orted

ly fac

ing ba

rrier

s to r

eceiv

ing as

sistan

ce

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re ta

nker

ed w

ater w

as re

porte

d as a

n eme

rgen

cy

WAS

H ne

eds

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re ca

sh as

sistan

ce w

as re

porte

d as a

n eme

rgen

cy

WAS

H ne

ed

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re se

mi-p

erma

nent

wells

wer

e rep

orted

as an

em

erge

ncy W

ASH

need

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re w

ater t

reatm

ent w

as re

porte

d as a

n eme

rgen

cy

WAS

H ne

ed

Faryab 21598 9180 22% 30% 100% 100% 22% 100% 19% 81% 99% 95% 6% 4% 56% 0% 0% 48% 18% 34% 0%

Almar 3800 N/A 0% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 70% 100% 100% 10% 0% 90% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0%

Andkhoy 2122 N/A 0% 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 90% 90% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 70% 30% 0% 0%

Dawlatabad 2934 N/A 0% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 10% 0% 90% 0%

Khani Char Bagh 2924 N/A 0% 90% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 100% 0% 0% 20% 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 0%

Maymana 9180 58% 13% 100% 100% 60% 100% 50% 60% 100% 88% 5% 3% 38% 0% 0% 33% 10% 58% 0%

Pashtunkot 1500 N/A 0% 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 100% 60% 1% 60% 0% 0% 20% 80% 0% 0%

Qaramqol 3720 N/A 0% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 50% 0% 50% 0%

Qaysar 650 N/A 0% 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 100% 0% 0% 67% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0%

Shirintagab 3948 N/A 10% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 100% 0% 0% 90% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0%

Hilmand 16429 22980 4% 9% 99% 100% 21% 100% 12% 83% 52% 42% 17% 5% 67% 22% 50% 3% 39% 42% 15%

Garmser 6008 N/A 0% 30% 100% 100% 10% 100% 40% 60% 25% 60% 20% 1% 40% 0% 50% 5% 35% 55% 5%

Lashkar Gah 1078 19700 11% 4% 100% 100% 36% 100% 7% 89% 71% 35% 25% 2% 65% 64% 18% 7% 36% 36% 21%

Marja 4287 N/A 0% 6% 94% 100% 19% 100% 6% 88% 69% 36% 0% 0% 91% 0% 81% 0% 44% 38% 19%

Nad e Ali 2135 N/A 0% 0% 100% 100% 29% 100% 0% 86% 71% 80% 40% 0% 60% 0% 86% 0% 71% 29% 0%

Nahr e Saraj 2615 3280 5% 0% 100% 100% 10% 100% 0% 90% 30% 33% 0% 1% 50% 10% 55% 0% 35% 45% 20%

Nawa e Barakzaiy 306 N/A 0% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0%

Jawzjan 19476 5394 29% 0% 98% 69% 0% 69% 0% 67% 93% 82% 72% 10% 0% 4% 0% 55% 11% 34% 1%

Aqcha 3231 N/A 44% 0% 100% 100% 0% 67% 0% 56% 89% 63% 13% 0% 0% 0% 0% 67% 11% 22% 0%

Fayzabad 3945 N/A 10% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 25% 90% 83% 72% 0% 0% 0% 0% 70% 25% 0% 5%

Khanaqah 3007 N/A 0% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 44% 89% 63% 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0%

Khwaja Du Koh 2291 305 14% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 71% 86% 67% 67% 0% 0% 29% 0% 71% 29% 0% 0%

Mardyan 1865 N/A 0% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 80% 100% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0%

Mingajik 1682 N/A 40% 0% 100% 100% 0% 60% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0%

Qushtepa 1573 N/A 0% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 67% 100% 33% 17% 0% 0% 0% 0% 83% 17% 0% 0%

Shiberghan 1882 5089 49% 0% 95% 26% 0% 37% 0% 88% 95% 95% 95% 10% 0% 5% 0% 19% 5% 77% 0%

Nimroz 3949 2220 68% 29% 99% 100% 11% 100% 34% 6% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 70% 4% 21% 73% 1%

Chakhansur 1005 N/A 90% 20% 100% 100% 10% 100% 55% 0% 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 75% 0% 10% 90% 0%

Charburjak 883 N/A 44% 33% 100% 100% 0% 100% 28% 0% 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A 6% 89% 0% 11% 89% 0%

Delaram 691 N/A 80% 47% 100% 100% 0% 100% 40% 0% 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 80% 0% 27% 73% 0%

Khashrod 802 N/A 88% 38% 100% 100% 0% 100% 25% 6% 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 94% 0% 6% 88% 6%

Zaranj 568 2220 43% 14% 95% 100% 38% 100% 24% 19% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 24% 19% 48% 33% 0%

ththhihjh


Informing



Prov

inces

Distr

icts

Total

estim

ated n

umbe

r of h

ouse

holds

s in

CDCs

Totta

l esti

mated

numb

er of

hous

ehold

s in I

SETs

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re a

chan

ge in

the m

ain w

ater s

ource

used

befor

e and

aft

er th

e dry

spell

was

repo

rted

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re po

pulat

ion gr

oups

have

not e

quall

y red

uced

their

wa

ter co

nsum

ption

sinc

e the

begin

ning o

f the d

ry sp

ell

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re a

decre

ase o

f the e

cono

mic w

ell-b

eing w

as

repo

rted a

s a re

sult o

f the d

ry sp

ell

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

are r

epor

tedly

depe

nden

t on

agric

ultur

e

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re cr

op de

ath as

a re

sult o

f the d

ry sp

ell w

as re

porte

d, of

comm

unitie

s with

at le

ast s

ome m

embe

rs de

pend

ent o

n agr

icultu

re

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

are r

epor

tedly

depe

nden

t on

lives

tock

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re liv

eliho

od de

ath as

a re

sult o

f the d

ry sp

ell w

as

repo

rted,

of co

mmun

ities w

ith at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

depe

nden

t on l

ivesto

ck

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re w

orse

ned h

ealth

conc

erns

due t

o the

dry s

pell

were

repo

rted

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re m

embe

rs we

re re

porte

d to a

ctive

ly us

e cop

ing

strate

gies t

o dea

l with

a lac

k of w

ater

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

trave

lled m

ore t

han 1

km to

fet

ch w

ater, o

f com

munit

ies ac

tively

using

copin

g stra

tegies

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

used

unpr

otecte

d wate

r so

urce

s, of

comm

unitie

s acti

vely

using

copin

g stra

tegies

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

used

less

than

5L of

wate

r/pe

rs/da

y, of

comm

unitie

s acti

vely

using

copin

g stra

tegies

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re at

leas

t som

e mem

bers

move

d to a

nothe

r loca

tion

to se

ek w

ater, o

f com

munit

ies ac

tively

using

copin

g stra

tegies

% of

comm

unitie

s hav

ing re

porte

dly re

ceive

d any

huma

nitar

ian as

sistan

ce in

the

six m

onths

prior

to da

ta co

llecti

on

% of

comm

unitie

s rep

orted

ly fac

ing ba

rrier

s to r

eceiv

ing as

sistan

ce

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re ta

nker

ed w

ater w

as re

porte

d as a

n eme

rgen

cy

WAS

H ne

eds

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re ca

sh as

sistan

ce w

as re

porte

d as a

n eme

rgen

cy

WAS

H ne

ed

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re se

mi-p

erma

nent

wells

wer

e rep

orted

as an

em

erge

ncy W

ASH

need

% of

comm

unitie

s whe

re w

ater t

reatm

ent w

as re

porte

d as a

n eme

rgen

cy

WAS

H ne

ed

Saripul 19976 8058 32% 0% 100% 99% 69% 97% 52% 87% 87% 61% 68% 14% 7% 8% 21% 3% 30% 65% 2%

Gosfandi 1937 N/A 30% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 90% 89% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 30% 60% 10%

Sancharak 2501 515 13% 0% 100% 100% 100% 94% 100% 94% 94% 93% 93% 0% 0% 6% 13% 0% 50% 50% 0%

Saripul 12255 7543 41% 0% 100% 99% 53% 96% 29% 82% 84% 42% 52% 14% 11% 10% 1% 5% 20% 73% 1%

Sayad 1806 N/A 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 88% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 88% 0% 75% 25% 0%

Sozmaqala 1477 N/A 17% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 83% 83% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 83% 0% 50% 50% 0%

Uruzgan 63318 10494 6% 4% 100% 96% 25% 99% 11% 99% 1% 0% 100% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 78% 22%

Chora 2250 N/A 0% 0% 100% 100% 50% 100% 0% 100% 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0%

Dehrawud 22500 N/A 18% 29% 100% 100% 59% 100% 35% 100% 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A 6% 0% 0% 0% 76% 24%

Gizab 14100 N/A 0% 0% 100% 100% 18% 100% 9% 100% 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 0% 0% 0% 91% 9%

Shahid e Hassas 15300 N/A 0% 0% 100% 100% 46% 100% 8% 100% 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 0% 0% 0% 92% 8%

Tirinkot 9168 10494 6% 0% 100% 93% 13% 99% 6% 99% 1% 0% 100% 0% 0% 7% 0% 0% 0% 74% 26%

TOTAL 241887 108399 21% 21% 99% 89% 42% 90% 27% 73% 60% 62% 38% 100% 18% 12% 28% 22% 18% 55% 5%


Megan HENERY

Highlight

Megan HENERY

Highlight

Megan HENERY

Sticky Note

Need to be updated - Some of these totals are wrong

afghanistan water, sanitation and hygiene (wash) dry ......ththhihjh wash dry spell assessment, june...

Documents