aerosol transport and conclusions · aerosol transport and deposition ... microsoft powerpoint -...
TRANSCRIPT
9/26/2013
1
Aerosol Transport and Deposition
Computational Modeling Particle Removal Environmental Applications
Biomedical Applications
Conclusions
Direct Numerical Simulation Large Eddy Simulation Stress Transport Model Two-Equation Models
Direct Numerical Simulation
Subgrid Scale Simulation
Gaussian Models- Filtered White Noise- Eddy Life Time
Pdf – Based Model
9/26/2013
2
)t(T
2
Tdt
d
L
______2
i
L
ii
uuuu i )t(T
2
Tdt
d
L
______2
i
L
ii
uuuu i
duu
)t(u)t(uT
0pp
____________________pp
L
duu
)t(u)t(uT
0pp
____________________pp
L
Instantaneous Velocity
Lagrangian Time Macro-Scale
Thompson (1987)
forceBrownian
i
forceElectric
Ei
forcenalGravitatio
i
forceLift
Li
forceDrag
pii
PDpi
)t(nfg
fuu1
24
ReC
dt
du
forceBrownian
i
forceElectric
Ei
forcenalGravitatio
i
forceLift
Li
forceDrag
pii
PDpi
)t(nfg
fuu1
24
ReC
dt
du
Re
]Re15.01[24C
687.0
D
Re
]Re15.01[24C
687.0
D
1000 Re 1 1000 Re 1
Assumptions: Dilute Flows, One-Way Interaction,Neglect Particle Collisions
Spectral Intensity
Particle Relaxation Time
White Noise Model
kT2Snn
kT2
Snn
1818
22cc
p CSdCd
1818
22cc
p CSdCd
Ounis, Ahmadi and McLaughlin (1991)Ounis, Ahmadi and McLaughlin (1991)
9/26/2013
3
CRCD Web-Based Course Module
Dt2)t(x 2 Simulations
g
He and Ahmadi (1999)10
-410
-210
010
210
410
-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
+
ud+
Wood Eq.(34)Fan & Ahmadi Eq.(38)Fan & Ahmadi Eq.(38) withgravity in flow directionPapavergos & HedleyLi & AhmadiHe & AhmadiRSM & "Two-layer"k- & "Two-layer"k-, "Two-layer" & Eq.(23)RSM,"Two-layer" & Eq.(23)
g
Tian and Ahmadi (2007)
9/26/2013
4
Hinze, 1975 22' yv 0y
Li and Ahmadi, 1993
2Ayv 4y
*yuy
*
2'
u
vv 008.0A
Ounis, et al. 1993 (DNS)
Quadratic Variation Near Wall Quadratic Variation Near Wall Particle and fiber depositionin human lung and noseParticle and fiber depositionin human lung and nose
EPA
NIOSH
The schematics of multi-level bifurcation model
At interface aa’:
(a) velocity magnitude (b) x- velocity(c) y- velocity(d) turbulence kinetic energy(e) turbulence dissipation rate(f) Reynolds stress uu(g) Reynolds stress vv
a
a’
a a’
(a)
(b)
(d) (e)
(c)
(g)(f)
9/26/2013
5
1 µm
Translational Motion
Rotational Motion
),()( tmmdt
dm BLhfpp fffg
v
),()(ˆˆˆˆˆˆ
ˆ
ˆtTTII
dt
dI B
x
h
xzyzy
x
x
),()(ˆˆˆˆˆˆ
ˆ
ˆtTTII
dt
dI B
y
h
yxzxz
y
y
),()(ˆˆˆˆˆˆ
ˆ
ˆtTTII
dt
dI B
z
h
zyxyx
z
z
Translational Brownian Force
Rotational Brownian Torque
)'()'(ˆ)(ˆ,0)(ˆ tStttt tBBB ff f
)'()'(ˆ)(ˆ,0)(ˆ tStttt rBBB TT T
/2ˆˆˆˆ
t
ii
t
iiKTRS
/2ˆˆˆˆ
r
ii
r
iiKTRS
Ellipsoidal Fibers Duct Flows
DNS
9/26/2013
6
d = 0.1 μm, aspect ratio = 12, length = 1.2 μm
10-1
100
101
102
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
Trachea and Bifurcation 1
+
Dep
osi
tion E
ffic
iency
Zhou et al. (2007): Cast A, 40-60L/minZhou et al. (2007): Cast B, 40-60L/minZhou et al. (2007): Cast A, 15L/minZhou et al. (2007): Cast B, 15L/minWang & Hopke (2008): 15-22L/minSim. 60L/min, u* = 0.86m/sSim. 60L/min, u
* = 0.53m/s
Sim. 60L/min, u* = 0.20m/s
Sim. 40L/min, u* = 0.53m/s
Sim. 15L/min, u* = 0.53m/s
Sim. 15L/min, u* = 0.20m/s
Sim. 15L/min, Laminar
Velocity magnitude contours in the nose.
NIOSH
9/26/2013
7
Particle size (nm)
Ca
ptu
reE
ffic
ien
cy%
0 20 40 60 80 1000
20
40
60
80
Simulation
Swift et al. - Cast B (1992)
Swift et al. - Cast C (1992)
Cheng et al. - Subject A (1996)
Cheng et al. - Subject B (1996)
Cheng et al. - Subject C (1996)
Cheng et al. - Subject D (1996)
Particle size (nm)
Ca
ptu
reE
ffic
ien
cy%
0 20 40 60 80 1000
20
40
60
80
100 Simulation
Swift et al. - Cast B (1992)
Swift et al. - Cast C (1992)
Cheng et al. - Subject A (1996)
Cheng et al. - Subject B (1996)
Cheng et al .- Subject C (1996)
Cheng et al. - Subject D (1996)
Kelly et al. - SLA (2004)
Kelly et al. - Viper (2004)
4 L/min 10 L/min
Ultra fine Particles
Pe-1
Ca
ptu
reE
ffic
ien
cy%
10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3
20
40
60
80
SimulationEmperical Equation
DL
QPe
DL
QPe
)85.01(1008.0280 Pee )85.01(1008.0280 Pee
Ultra fine Particles
Diameter in Micron
De
po
sitio
nin
Pe
rce
nta
ge
0 2 4 6 8 100
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 3.75 L/min7.5 L/min15 L/min
*
De
po
sitio
nin
Pe
rce
nta
ge
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.410
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
9/26/2013
8
• Deposition was influenced byanatomy
• Fibers deposit less frequentlythan spheres
7th International Conference on Multiphase Flow ICMF 2010, Tampa, FL, USA
Case Study
Before Septoplasty
After Septoplasty
CT Scan Images
Abouali et al. (2012)
Before Septoplasty After Septoplasty
9/26/2013
9
Before Operation After Operation
Abouali et al. (2012)
Q=7 L/min
The stream lines of the airflow (colored by velocity magnitude
Effect of Thermal Plume and facial
features
Effect of Thermal Plume and facial
features
Air temperature =20oC
Mannequin surface temperature = 34oC
9/26/2013
11
125h
630
630
x
y
z
Upper Wall
Center Line
Mean Flow
Lower Wall
y
z
One-way coupling
Four-way coupling, M.L.=20%
Four-way coupling, M.L.=40%
Mean Flow Direction
9/26/2013
12
du
Effect of Mass Loading
Two-Way Coupling
Particle Collisions
Four-Way Coupling
Using fundamentals of multiphase flows provides a better understanding ofenvironmental and biomedical systems
Computational modeling helps inoptimizing industrial processes
● Dr. P. Zamankhan ● Prof. J. Tu● Dr. L. Tian ● Dr. Kiato● Dr. Kevin Shanley ● Prof. Bohl● Dr. Mazyar Salmanzadeh ● Dr. M. Shams● Dr. F-G Fan ● Prof. McLaughlin● Dr. C. He ● Prof. Saidi● Dr. K. Nazridoust ● Dr. A. Li● Dr. M. Soltani ● Dr. O. Abouali● Dr. A. Mazaheri ● Dr. W. Kvasnak● Dr. H. Zhang ● Dr. X. Zhang ● Dr. H. Nasr