adverse events in blood donors at ......donation of blood is one of the most appreciated...
TRANSCRIPT
Transfuzijski center
ADVERSE EVENTS IN BLOOD DONORS
AT TRANSFUSION CENTER IN
GENERAL HOSPITAL CELJE FROM 2014 TO 2017
JANJA PAJK, dr. med. spec. transf. med.
SLOVENIA
Transfuzijski center
SLOVENIA ON THE MAP
Transfuzijski center
CELJE CASTLE
Transfuzijski center
GENERAL HOSPITAL CELJE
Transfuzijski center
INTRODUCTION
Donation of blood is one of the most appreciated contributions in society
Although the blood donation procedure is relatively safe, there is a certain risk of adverse events (AEs)
AEs may deter blood donors from further donations
In order to avoid a decrease in the number of blood donors due to AEs, we must constantly monitor their occurrence and improve preventative measures
Transfuzijski center
TYPES OF AEs
AEs during blood donation can be systemic or local
Systemic symptoms primarily occur due to a vasovagal reaction (VVR)
Local side effects are associated with phlebotomy:
hematoma
bruising
arm pain and stiffness
arterial puncture
The incidence of AEs varies between 0.37-2.5%
Veldhuizen I, et al. Transfusion 2012;52:1871-79
Transfuzijski center
VASOVAGAL REACTIONS
The most common systemic reactions
Caused by reflex bradycardia and arteriolar vasodilatation
Symptoms consist of: sweating,
nausea,
dizziness,
vomiting,
pallor,
hypotension,
bradycardia
loss of consciousness
The most common reason for cessation of further blood donationsWiltbank TB et al.Transfusion 2008;48:1799-808.
Transfuzijski center
TRIGGERS FOR VVR
Age <50 years
Female sex
BMI <25
Pulse >90/min
<8 hours of sleep
Time interval from last meal >4 hours
First donation
Circulating volume <4.3 L
Takanashi M, er al. Transfusion and Apheresis Science 2012; 47 (3): 319-25.
Transfuzijski center
AIM OF THE STUDY
To collect information on AEs during blood donations at the Transfusion Center in Celje(secondary level)
Get an insight into the number and causes of AEs
On the basis of the results, prepare a strategy to prevent future AEs
Transfuzijski center
METHODS
Analysis of data from the Datec information system
Additional analysis of internal AE tracking forms
Analysis of AE data on all donations in the years 2014-2017
Transfuzijski center
DATEC
Transfuzijski center
AE TRACKING FORM
Transfuzijski center
RESULTS
Celje region has a population of 300.000
Donors: male › female
18 – 65 years
87,3% regular donors
Self-sufficient in blood supply
Transfuzijski center
RESULTS
Between 2014 and 2017,
34.548 blood donations were made
We recorded 331 AEs (0.95%)
By frequency they are as follows:
- the most common AE was nausea (42% of all AEs)
- collapse post donation (21.45%)
- collapse during donation (16.31%)
Transfuzijski center
RESULTS
Avarage 2014 - 2017:
5.856 donors/year
746 new donors/year (12,7%)
8.637 units of blood/year
2014 2015 2016 2017
all donors 6.094 5.937 5.691 5.702
new donors 841 778 658 709
number of donations 8.834 8.226 8.662 8.726
Transfuzijski center
Transfuzijski center
Transfuzijski center
RESULTS
A1: Collapse before donation, without loss of consciousness; A2: Collapse before donation, with partial loss of consciousness; A3: Collapse before donation, with spasms
P1: Collapse after donation, without loss of consciousness; P2: Collapse after donation, with partial loss of consciousness; P3: Collapse after donation, with spasms
I1: Collapse at donation, without loss of consciousness; I2: Collapse at donation, with partial loss of consciousness; I3: Collapse at donation, with spasms
Transfuzijski center
RESULTS
34.548 donations (2014 – 2017)
331 AE or 0.95%
Transfuzijski center
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
2014 2015 2016 2017
Nu
mb
er
of
ad
ve
rse
ev
en
ts
Hemathoma
Nausea
Collapse A1
Collapse A2
Collapse A3
Collapse I1
Collapse I2
Collapse I3
Collapse P1
Collapse P2
Collapse P3
Arm pain after don.
Hyperventilation
Fall injury
Artery punction
Nerve damage
A1: Collapse before donation, without loss of consciousness; A2: Collapse before donation, with partial loss of consciousness; A3: Collapse before donation, with spasms
P1: Collapse after donation, without loss of consciousness; P2: Collapse after donation, with partial loss of consciousness; P3: Collapse after donation, with spasms
I1: Collapse at donation, without loss of consciousness; I2: Collapse at donation, with partial loss of consciousness; I3: Collapse at donation, with spasms
Transfuzijski center
DISCUSSION
In our study, the incidence of AEs is comparable to that in other centers
The incidence of nausea far exceeds other symptoms at 42% (141)
If we reclassify nausea as one of the symptoms of VVR, the majority of AEs are VVR at 90.63% (300)
Incidence of local reactions is 9.37% (31), which confirms good technical skills of phlebotomists
Transfuzijski center
STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING VVR
Excluding people with an estimated low blood volume for full donation
Providing education before donation
Drinking water before donation
Use of muscle tension elements
Introduction of a questionnaire based on Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)
Masser B. Transfusion 2012; 52: 1844-48, Veldhuizen I, et al. Transfusion 2012; 52: 1871-79
Transfuzijski center
STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING VVR USED
AT TC/MOBILES
Providing education before donation
in secondary schools (20 years),
at doctor’s office
Drinking water before donation (30 years)
Use of muscle tension elements (5 years)
Transfuzijski center
CONCLUSIONS
Blood donation is safe, but AEs are possible
Serious AEs, especially VVR, have a negative impact on subsequent donor behavior
Regular monitoring of incidence of AEs is necessary, reporting in HVS
On the basis of monitoring, strategies for reducing AEs can be adopted
Transfuzijski center
„ success is not final,
failure is not fatal:
it is the courage to continue
that counts „Winston Churchill
Transfuzijski center
I AM ALWAYS OPEN
My contact data:
Janja Pajk, dr. med. spec. transf. med.
Center of TransfusionMedicine,
Oblakova 5 SI - 3000 Celje,
Slovenia