advanced weather radar application technology at jma4)_kigawa_jma_radar.pdf · 4 jma c-band weather...
TRANSCRIPT
WMO/CIMO/TECO-2016, Madrid, Spain, 27-29 September 2016 SESSION 4 – Challenges and opportunities for continuous improvement in observing technologies
Advanced weather radar application technology at JMA
Seiichiro Kigawa1, Toshihiro Hayashi1 and Takeshi Nishimura1
1 Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), Tokyo, Japan
Abstract
The Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) has operated a radar-based precipitation
analysis system since 1982. With this approach, radar precipitation observation data
are calibrated using the results of rain gauge observation by JMA and other central/local
government bodies. Both types of data are essential to the formulation of various
advanced products such as Nowcasting, Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE)
and Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting (QPF), which are in turn critical for the
issuance of weather forecasts and warnings.
JMA’s provision of the High-Resolution Precipitation Nowcast (HRPN) product
(spatial/temporal resolution: 250 meters/5 minutes), which was launched in August
2014, requires the comprehensive use of various types of observations data collected in
real time. These include information from more than 9,000 rain gauges, 33 wind
profilers, 16 radiosondes, 20 JMA C-band weather radars, and X-band radars managed
by Japan’s Hydrological Services under the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport
and Tourism (MLIT). Prediction for the HRPN product involves the extrapolation of
rainfall distribution movement and trends with an orographic effect and dynamical
estimation, which supports analysis of three-dimensional atmospheric and cloud
physical parameters combined with data from various upper-air and surface-base
observation networks. The HRPN product is a crystallization of information from multiple
observing systems and cutting-edge estimation technologies, and is expected to
contribute to the goals of the WMO Integrated Global Observing System (WIGOS).
This report gives a summary of the HRPN product, outlines related challenges and
provides information on future work.
1. Weather radar application at JMA
The Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) has operated a weather radar-based
precipitation analysis system since 1982. Today the system provides data for a variety
of nowcasting products that are used directly in JMA’s weather forecasting and
warning/advisory services (Figure 1), including nowcasts and Numerical Weather
Prediction (NWP). Nowcasts are used for real-time nowcasting products, Quantitative
Precipitation Estimation (QPE) and Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting (QPF).
2
Hydrogeological indices for variables such as soil water and runoff are calculated using
QPE/QPF with a tank model. These products and hydrogeology indices are critical in
the issuance of weather forecasts and warnings
As Japan’s operational weather radars have conventionally taken a single-polarized
form, standard radar precipitation observation data are calibrated using the results of
rain gauge observation by JMA and other central/local government bodies.
Figure 1 Weather radar application at JMA
2. High-resolution Precipitation Nowcasts
2.1. Overview
JMA has issued Precipitation Nowcasts since summer 2004. On the 10th anniversary
of their introduction in August 2014, a new generation of High-resolution Precipitation
Nowcasts (HRPNs) became operational (JMA 2015). The specifications of HRPNs are
summarized in Table 1.
Spatial/temporal resolution
250 meters/5 minutes over land and coasts from 00 to 30 minutes ahead 1 km/5 minutes over land and coasts from 35 to 60 minutes ahead 1 km/5 minutes from coasts from 00 to 60 minutes ahead
Update frequency Every 5 minutes Initial data Horizontal precipitation distribution analyzed from radar,
rain gauge and upper-air observation information Vertical atmospheric profiles analyzed from radiosonde
and cumulonimbus cloud feature information Forecast process Kinetic: non-linear motion/intensity extrapolation with
orographic effect Dynamic: vertically one-dimensional convective model with
calculation relating to raindrop generation, precipitation
3
and evaporation Convective initiation: three triggers: (1) downflow caused
by heavy rainfall; (2) temporal variations in surface temperature and water vapor; (3) intersection of arch-shaped thin echoes
Elements of distributed data
Precipitation intensity 5-minute cumulative precipitation Prediction uncertainty Analysis error sources
Table 1 Specifications of High-resolution Precipitation Nowcasts
2.1.1. Spatial/temporal resolution and update frequency
The spatial grid point interval of the new nowcasts has been shortened from the
conventional 1 km to 250 m in order to enhance observation and forecasting capacity
for sudden and localized heavy rain. However, for the second half of the forecast period
and for open-sea areas, spatial resolution has been left at 1 km to limit the size of data
files distributed to users in consideration of analysis and prediction accuracy (Figure 2).
HRPNs are updated every five minutes.
Figure 2 HRPN spatial/temporal resolution and update frequency
2.1.2. Initial data
HRPNs require the comprehensive use of various types of observation data collected
in real time. These include information from more than 9,000 rain gauges operated by
JMA and other central/local government bodies, 33 wind profilers, 16 radiosondes, 20
4
JMA C-band weather radars, and 39 X-band radars managed by Japan’s Hydrological
Services under the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT;
Figure 3). Initial precipitation intensity distribution is determined via three-dimensional
analysis of storms using radar echo intensity, Doppler velocity, rain gauge, surface and
upper-air observation data.
Data on vertical atmospheric profiles is used for prediction generation. The initial
values for such data are based on upper-air observations, and are updated from
comparison of cumulonimbus cloud profiles (echo top rising speed, ceiling height,
lightning count and rainfall amount) between radar/radio-based observation and
calculation using the Vertically One-dimensional Convective Model (VOCM). This model
is used to predict rainfall based on calculation of cloud particle/raindrop generation and
development, fallout and evaporation of raindrops in a climbing bubble, and is also used
to predict cumulonimbus cloud profiles.
Thus, HRPN multi-observing-system-based nowcasting products are superior to their
radar-based counterparts thanks to their focus on various observation data application
technologies.
Figure 3 Observation network data used in HRPNs
2.1.3. Forecast process
HRPN formulation involves two processes for rain distribution prediction in three
spatial dimensions: (1) high-resolution prediction based on extrapolation of the
5
three-dimensional distribution of water content using VOCM for selected heavy rain
regions; and (2) low-resolution prediction based on a longer time interval and reduced
vertical calculation outside high-resolution prediction regions (Figure 4). The
data-processing functions are designed for prediction via a dynamical estimation
approach suitable for the forecasting of rapidly changeable rain phenomena
using a kinetic approach involving the extrapolation of phenomenon movement
trends.
Figure 4 3-dimensional prediction approach
Several heavy rain areas are selected for the high-resolution prediction illustrated on the left of
the figure. Other echoes are processed via low-resolution prediction. The results of these
predictions are combined for final surface rainfall prediction.
HRPNs enable the prediction of convection initiation for longer lead times against
rapidly developing heavy rainfall based on three phenomena associated with
cumulonimbus generation (Figure 5).
Downflow caused by heavy rainfall
Cell formation is predicted in locations where gust fronts converge the most strongly
with surrounding surface winds.
Temporal variations in surface temperature and water vapor
Cell formation is predicted in locations where surface winds converge in the boundary
between increases/decreases in surface temperature and water vapor.
Intersection of arch-shaped thin echoes
6
Cell formation is predicted in locations where two thin echoes intersect based on the
assumption that such intersection causes temporary increases in updraft.
When one or multiple triggers are detected, rainfall is predicted using VOCM to simulate
the life cycle of convective cloud in high-resolution prediction.
Figure 5 Convection initiation
Among the three triggers for convective initiation, intersection of thin echoes and temporal
variation of surface temperature/water vapor require the convergence of surface wind.
2.1.4. Distribution data
HRPN products are provided to local weather offices, private weather companies and
the public to support close monitoring of heavy-rain areas and disaster prevention
activities.
HRPN data also contain information on prediction uncertainty based on estimation of
the magnitude of error included in the rainfall forecast. Knowledge of this uncertainty is
expected to be useful in applications such as determining high probability of downpours
and predicting the range of river water levels. Users are also informed of possible error
sources such as radar clutter, bright band, upper-air echo and hail in order to highlight
potential uncertainties in HRPN analysis.
2.2. Quick and easy access to HRPNs and related weather information
HRPNs are intended to support self-protection against sudden heavy rain. JMA’s
related web pages are designed to give users an overview of the situation with the
7
minimum number of clicks to enable prompt evacuation for safety. These resources are
optimized for mobile-device and PC viewing (Figure 6).
Figure 6 JMA’s HRPN web resources
Mobile (left) and PC (right) resources are provided to support self-protection. Several options are
given for superimposition of information on areas where heavy rain, lightning and hazardous
winds are expected. Rainfall amounts from rain gauge observation can also be displayed.
Quick access
Users can zoom in/out of maps to find their location using landmarks such as roads,
railways and rivers. GPS information can also be used where available, and default
locations can be set to facilitate future usage.
User-friendliness
Options are provided for superimposition with heavy rain area movement and areas
at high risk of lightning and hazardous winds to facilitate understanding of local weather
conditions. Current areas of heavy rain and those expected within 30 minutes are
enclosed in yellow lines to highlight approaching downpours without the need for
time-consuming animation viewing. Shaded red rectangles can be overlaid to display
areas where lightning and tornadoes/other hazardous winds are likely based on
Thunder and Hazardous Wind Potential nowcasts. Landmark information can also be
superimposed. Users can personalize these options to support self-protective action.
8
More than two million page views were recorded on 22 August 2014, just two weeks
after the resource was launched, when rain and thundershowers hit the whole of Japan
in association with the approach of Typhoon Vongfong. For more information, see
http://www.jma.go.jp/en/highresorad/.
3. Advantages of synthetic use of various observation networks
As described in Section 2.1.2, various types of observation (such as the use of two
distinct radar networks, surface-based and upper-air-based operation) are used
synthetically in HRPN generation. The advantages of combined processing of
information from various observation networks include:
More accurate atmospheric analysis
Provision of uncertainty/error information on analysis
These advantages support high-quality prediction as exemplified in HRPN generation.
The sections below specify how observation data are processed synthetically in
HRPNs.
3.1. Freezing height estimation
In radar composition processing for HRPN generation, the height at which a
temperature of 0°C is observed (referred to as freezing height) must be known to avoid
increased radar observation error caused by melting snowflakes. Freezing height can
be estimated from ring-shaped echo size based on radar data, vertical speed based on
wind profiler data, and temperature profiles based on surface and radiosonde
observation. A ring-shaped echo is interpreted as a radar’s bright band caused by
melting snowflakes around freezing height. The line of discontinuity in vertical speed
can be determined from observation data, and can be taken as the freezing zone
because lower speed above and higher speed below the line indicate the terminal
speeds of snowflakes and raindrops, respectively.
Figure 7 shows a freezing-height contours based on such observations. The chart
covers 7 JMA radars, 10 wind profilers and 2 radiosonde stations indicated by circles,
squares and triangles, respectively. Radar and wind profiler networks both provide
spatially sparse data with low uncertainty. Denser information derived from a
combination of surface and radiosonde observation data may have an increased bias
due to the uncertainty of vertical temperature profiles. The integrated system consisting
of radar, wind profiler, surface and radiosonde observation data provides more accurate,
9
denser information on freezing heights than single observation-based estimation, as the
figure shows.
Figure 7 Freezing height estimation
Contour lines indicate metric 0°C temperature. Observation stations are marked with circles
(JMA radars), squares (wind profilers) and triangles (radiosondes). Small horizontal-scale curves
shown by contour lines are mainly derived from surface-based temperature observation.
3.2. Update on vertical atmospheric profiles
For HRPN prediction, vertical atmospheric profiles are estimated via the synthetic use
of various types of observation data from and around heavy rain areas. Data on vertical
atmospheric profiles are also used as input for HRPN prediction. Initial values for these
data are based on radiosonde observation results, and are updated via comparison of
cumulonimbus cloud profiles between observation and calculation. This is shown in
Figure 8, which illustrates (from left to right) the generation, development, maturation
and dissipation of a cumulonimbus cloud. The bottom part of the figure shows three
scenarios for vertical profiles based on environmental analysis, and the green-circled
elements in the four columns on the right indicate similarities to observation data. Here,
the middle candidate is selected as the best match for the observation data. The
selected vertical-profile data are used to modify operational vertical profiles in and
around the rain area. As this update processing is scheduled to take place every five
minutes, the updated vertical profiles can be used for prediction of the next initial time.
10
This mechanism is supported by radar, surface (temperature, relative humidity, wind)
and upper-air (radiosonde, wind profiler) observation data, which provide more rational
vertical profiles than estimation based on the single observation system.
Figure 8 Update on vertical atmospheric profiles
In the top diagram, the horizontal axis indicates time and the vertical axis indicates altitude. It
shows cumulonimbus cloud profiles with observed echo top rising speed (represented by the
length of the upward arrow), echo top ceiling, echo top ceiling height (dashed line) and rainfall
amount (depth of the blue area).
The lower diagrams illustrate three possible scenarios calculated using the different vertical
profiles indicated in the graphs on the left. The latest and hypothetical vertical temperature
profiles are indicated by dashed blue and solid red lines, respectively.
In the first of the three scenarios, estimation produces a lower rising speed and ceiling height, no
lighting and little rainfall. In the third scenario, the rising speed and ceiling height are
overestimated but the rainfall amount estimate is reasonable. The second scenario is recognized
to provide the most reasonable estimation compared with observation data.
3.3. Radar composition and rainfall estimation
Radar composition in HRPN generation is designed to minimize the effects of clutter,
bright band and scan time differences based on estimation of radio propagation paths
11
and horizontal wind speed data. Rainfall is estimated from radar composition with
correction for variables such as wind-induced drift and evaporation using data on wind,
temperature, humidity and rainfall as observed using rain gauges. These key features of
HRPN rainfall estimation are summarized in Figure 9.
(1) A radio propagation path traced from radar is first estimated using vertical
atmospheric profiles. (2) The observation height is allocated adaptively on the basis of
radio propagation path estimation and detection of clutter and bright band. (3) Echo
horizontal drift as observed during a volume scan is corrected. (4) Rain rate data
obtained from individual radar observations are composited using two methods to
create a national mosaic. (5) Drift and evaporation of raindrops during their fall are
corrected. (6) Radar observation data are adjusted in consideration of rain gauge
observation data. Before this process, rain gauge data uncertainty induced by wind is
corrected.
Figure 9 Characteristics of radar composition and rainfall estimation
The dashed blue line in the figure indicates observation height allocated on the basis of radio
propagation estimation and clutter/bright-band detection. The allocation is normally higher above
clutter or lower near the bright band.
This mechanism is also supported by data from radar, surface (temperature, relative
humidity, wind, rainfall amount) and upper-air (radiosonde, wind profiler) observations,
which provide more rational vertical profiles than estimation based on a single observing
system. The combination of these observations enables accurate rainfall estimation and
the provision of related uncertainty information.
12
It is important to note that radar and rain gauge observation data are used
synthetically; radar data are not calibrated against rain gauge data as in conventional
precipitation analysis because one of the radar networks used for HRPNs is a
dual-polarized system, which enables more accurate rain rate estimation than a
single-polarized system. Wind also plays an important role in rainfall estimation to
connect remotely sensed (plane) radar data with directly measured (pinpoint) rain
gauge data (Figure 10). The current HRPN algorithm is not designed to account for
orographic effects or the influence of buildings on wind near rain gauges, and therefore
requires further improvement. In this context, estimation of wind fields where orographic
effects or buildings near the rain gauge may influence data is currently being
researched using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. Further, wind-induced
uncertainty in rain gauge data vary with precipitation intensity, precipitation type
(rain/snow) and drop size distribution (DSD) as well as wind speed. In future work, DSD
information estimated using disdrometer or dual-polarized radar data will be researched
to connect plane radar data with pinpoint rain gauge data by adjusting for effects on
various types of precipitation particles.
Figure 10 Wind-induced horizontal drift
The current HRPN operational algorithm is designed to correct wind-induced horizontal drift that
occurs when raindrops fall based on the wind speed of several layers (top). The nature of
complex raindrop tracks associated with air flow (bottom left) and the orographic concentration of
raindrops are currently being researched.
13
In short, the HRPN product in operational service is a crystallization of information
from multiple observing systems and cutting-edge estimation technologies. HRPNs are
expected to contribute to the goals of the WMO Integrated Global Observing System
(WIGOS).
4. Current challenges and future work
HRPNs are not technically perfect, and current developmental work is focused on
accurate prediction of major downpours. One development task involves the
establishment of a sophisticated algorithm to connect plane radar data with pinpoint rain
gauge data in consideration of complex wind fields and DSD information. Another
involves development for more user-friendly HRPN visualization to support
self-protective action by visitors to Japan and other individuals. Numerous challenges
remain to be tackled; the support of everybody involved is appreciated.
More information: http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/en/Activities/highres_nowcast.html
5. Summary
The high-resolution Precipitation Nowcasts (HRPNs) launched in August 2014 are a
product of the weather radar-based precipitation analysis system that JMA has
operated for more than 30 years. HRPNs are characterized by the comprehensive use
of various observation data types, including information from two distinct radar networks
and from surface-based/upper-air-based observation networks.
The advantages of such comprehensive use include the achievement of more
accurate atmospheric analysis with uncertainty/error information, which contributes to
high-quality prediction as exemplified in HRPN generation. This paper outlines some of
the specific mechanisms of observation data processing used in HRPN generation.
Further information will be shared in the future.
JMA remains committed to its ongoing research and development toward the
improvement of HRPNs via the establishment of highly sophisticated technologies and
integrated observing systems.
Reference
JMA, 2015: Techniques of Precipitation Analysis and Prediction for High-resolution
Precipitation Nowcasts.
http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/en/Activities/Techniques_of_Precipitation_Analysis_and_Pred
iction_developed_for_HRPNs.pdf