adp 1 : multi-role combat aircraft
DESCRIPTION
AIRCRAFT DESIGN PROJECT 1 : DESIGN OF A MULTI-ROLE COMBAT AIRCRAFTTRANSCRIPT
DESIGN OF A MULTIROLE COMBAT AIRCRAFT
AIRCRAFT DESIGN PROJECT- 1 REPORT
Submitted by
SARANYA.N
TASNEEM.RASHID
in partial fulfillment for the award of the degree
of
BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING
in
AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING
RAJALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE
ANNA UNIVERSITY:: CHENNAI 600 025
APRIL 20I2
1
2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to extent my heartfelt thanks to Prof. Yokesh Kumar Sinha (Head of aeronautical department) for giving me his able support and encouragement. At this juncture I must emphasis the point that this design project would not have been possible without the highly informative and valuable guidance by Prof .P.S. Venkatnarayanan, whose vast knowledge and experience has must us go about this project with great care. we have great pleasure in expressing our sincere and whole hearted gratitude to them. It is worth mentioning about my team mates , friends and colleagues of the aeronautical department, for extending their kind help whenever the necessity arose. I thank one and all who have directly or indirectly helped me in making this design.
3
INDEX
4
Serial no.
Content Page no
1. Aim 2. Abstract 3. Introduction 4. Design sequence 5. Collection of similar
aircraft and data retrieval6. Comparative data sheet7. Design graphs8. Design data sheet9. Mission specification10. Weight estimation11. Power plant selection12. Airfoil selection13. Performance calculation 14. Three view diagram15. Conclusion16. Bibliographies and
references
ABSTRACT
5
ABSTRACT:
Our project is the design of a multirole combat aircraft. A multirole combat
aircraft is an aircraft designed to perform different roles in combat. The air-to-
air combat role has been normally performed by fighter aircraft. In addition a
multirole fighter has secondary roles such as air-to-surface attack .
The term multirole has been reserved for aircraft designed with the aim of using
a common airframe for multiple tasks where the same basic airframe is adapted
to a number of differing roles. The main motivation for developing multirole
aircraft is cost reduction in using a common airframe.
The project report comprises of a literature survey of about 22 fighter aircrafts
Based on it a number of graphs were drawn to get a rough idea of the
specifications of the aircraft.. After this an appropriate airfoil is selected and its
important parameters are calculated. Then the wing loading estimation is done
using two constraints and further the thrust to weight ratio is estimated using
three constraints. Using this thrust is calculated in order to select an appropriate
engine. Finally performance graphs are drawn and a 3-view diagram of the
aircraft is drawn
Our multirole fighter is a single seater powered by twin turbofan engines ,
flying at Mach 2 with a range of 2000km.
6
LIST OF TABLES
S.NO DESCRIPTION
1 Suggested fuel fractions for several mission phases
2 Suggested values for L/D, cj, ηp & cp for several mission phases
3 Equivalent skin friction coefficients
4 Values for CDO, e, for various types of aircrafts
5 Thrust to weight ratio for various types of aircrafts
LIST OF FIGURES
1. Graphs of various parameters Vs cruise speed
2. Weight trends for fighters
3. Mission Profile
4. 3-view diagram of multirole combat aircraft
7
LIST OF SYMBOLS, ABBREVIATIONS AND NOMENCLATURE
1. CD-Drag coefficient2. CDO-Zero lift drag coefficient3. Cj-Specific fuel consumption for jet engine4. CL-Lift coefficient5. Cp –Specific fuel consumption for propeller driven aircraft6. e-Ostwald efficiency factor7. g-Acceleration due to gravity8. L/D-Lift to drag ratio9. Mff-Mission fuel fraction10.N-time increment for free roll just after touchdown, before brakes are
applied11.R/C-Rate of climb12.R-Range of the aircraft13.sa –Approach distance14.sf –Flare distance15.sg –ground roll16.S-Wing area17.V∞-Free stream velocity18.Vf-Flare velocity19.Vstall-Stall velocity20.W/S-Wing loading21.Wcrew-Crew Weight22.WE-Empty weight23.WF(res)-Reserve fuel weight24.WF(used)-Weight of the fuel used during the mission25.WPL-Payload weight26.WTFO-Trapped fuel weight27.WTO-Takeoff weight28.ηp -Propeller efficiency29.ρ∞ -Free stream density at sea level
8
INTRODUCTION
9
INTRODUCTION:
A multirole combat aircraft is an aircraft designed to perform different roles in combat. The air-to-air combat role has been normally performed by fighter aircraft. So a multirole combat aircraft with air combat role and other secondary role such as air-to-surface attack is as often called a multirole fighter. The term has been reserved for aircraft designed with the aim of using a common airframe for multiple tasks where the same basic airframe is adapted to a number of differing roles. Originally the term was used for a common airframe built in a number of different variants for different roles. Multirole has also been applied to one aircraft with both major roles, for example:
a primary air-to-air combat role
a secondary role like air-to-surface attack.
More roles can be added, such as air reconnaissance, forward air control, and electronic warfare. Attack missions include the subtypes air interdiction, suppression of enemy air defence (SEAD), and close air support (CAS).
The main motivation for developing multirole aircraft is cost reduction in using a common airframe.
DESIGN OF AN AIRPLANE:
Airplane design is both an art and a science. Its the intellectual engineering process of creating on paper(or on a computer screen) a flying machine to
meet certain specifications and requirements established by potential users( or as perceived by the manufacturer) and
pioneer innovative, new ideas and technology
The design process is indeed an intellectual activity that is rather specified one that is tempered by good intuition developed via by attention paid to successful airplane designs that have been used in the past, and by (generally proprietary) design procedure and databases(hand books etc) that are a part of every airplane manufacturer
PHASES OF AIRPLANE DESIGN:
The complete design process has gone through three distinct phases that are carried out in sequence. They are
Conceptual design
10
Preliminary design Detailed design
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN:
The design process starts with a set of specifications (requirements)for a new airplane, or much less frequently as the response to the desire to implement some pioneering, innovative new ideas and technology. In either case, there is a rather concrete good towards which the designers are aiming. The first steps towards achieving that goal constitute the conceptual design phase. Here, within a certain somewhat fuzzy latitude, the overall shape , size, weight and performance of the new design are determined.
The product of the conceptual design phase is a layout on a paper or on a computer screen) of the airplane configuration. But one has to visualize this drawing as one with flexible lines, capable of being slightly changed during the preliminary design phase. However the conceptual design phase determines such fundamental aspects as the shape of the wings(swept back, swept forward or straight), the location of the wings related to the fuselage, the shape and location of the horizontal and vertical tail, the use of a engine size and placement etc, the major drivers during the conceptual design process are aerodynamics, propulsion and flight performance.
Structural and context system considerations are not dealt with in any detail. However they are not totally absent. During the conceptual design phase the designer is influenced by such qualitative as the increased structural loads imposed by a high horizontal tail location trough the fuselage, and the difficulties associated with cutouts in the wing structure if the landing gear are to be retracted into the wing rather than the fuselage or engine nacelle. No part of the design is ever carried out in a total vacuum unrelated to the other parts.
PRELIMINARY DESIGN:
In the preliminary design phase, only minor changes are made to the configuration layout (indeed, if major changes were demanded during this phase, the conceptual design process have been actually flawed to begin with. It is in the preliminary design phase that serious structural and control system analysis and design take place.
During the phase also, substantial wind tunnel testing will be carried out and major computational fluid dynamics (CFD)
Calculations of the computer flow fluid over the airplane configurations
11
Its possible that the wind tunnel tests the CFD calculations will in cover some undesirable aerodynamic interference or some unexpected stability problems which will promote change to the configuration layout
At the end of preliminary design phase the airplane configuration is frozen and preciously defined. The drawing process called lofting is carried out which mathematically models the precise shape of the outside skin of the airplane making certain that all sections of the aircraft property fit together
The end of the preliminary design phase brings a major concept to commit the manufacture of the airplane or not. The importance of this decision point for modern aircraft manufacturers cannot be understated, considering the tremendous costs involved in the design and manufacture of a new airplane. This is no better illustrated.
DETAIL DESIGN:
The detail design phase is literally the nuts and bolts phase of airplane design. The aerodynamic, propulsion, structures performance and flight control analysis have all been finished with the preliminary design phase. For detail design. The airplane is now simply a machine to be fabricated. The pressure design of each. Individual rib, spar and section of skin now take place. The size of number and location of fastness are determined. At this stage, flight simulators for the airplane are developed. And these are just a few of the many detailed requirements during the detail design phase. At the end of this phase, the aircraft is ready to be fabricated.
THE SEVEN INTELLECTUAL PIVOT POINTS FOR CONCEPTUAL DESIGN:
The design process is an art of creativity and like all creative creatures, there is no one correct and absolute method to carry it out. However conceptual design can be imagined at an array of the seven points at strategic locations in some kind of intellectual space, and these pivot points are connected by a verb of detailed approaches. The web constructed by different people would be different, although the pivot points should be the same ,due tp their fundamental significance.
12
BLOCK ARRAY FOR CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
1.REQUIREMENTS
2.WEIGHT OF THE AIRPLANE-FIRST ESTIMAE
3.CRITICAL PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS
MAX LIFT CO-EFFICIENT(CL)max
LIFT TO DRAG RATIO, L/D
WING LOADING, W/S
THRUST TO WEIGHT RATIO, T/W
4. CONFIGURATION LAYOUT-SHAPE AND SIE OF THE AIRPLANE ON A DRAWING (OR COPMUTER SCREEN)
5. BETTERWEIGHT ESTIMATE
6. PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS- DOES THE DESIGN MEET EXCEED REQUIREMENTS?
YES
7. OPTIMIZATION –IS IT THE BEST DESIGN?
13
REQUIREMENTS:
Requirements for a new airplane design are as unique and different
from one airplane to another as fingerprints are from one. However being to
another. Hence we cannot stipulate in this section a specific, standard form to
use to write requirements there is none.
For any new airplane design. There must be some established
requirements which serve as the jumping off point for the design process, and
which serve as the focused goal for the completed design. Typical aspects are
frequently stipulated in the requirements are some combination of the following
RANGE
TAKE OFF DISTANCE
STALLING VELOCITY
ENDURANCE
MAXIMUM VELOCITY
RATE OF CLIMB
MAXIMUM LOAD FACTOR
SERVICE CEILING
14
DESIGN SEQUENCE
15
DESIGN SEQUENCE
1. Collection of existing similar aircraft data
2. Retrivel of data
3. Design graphs
4. Preparation of design data sheet
5. Mission specification
6. Weight estimation
Mission fuel weight estimation
Operating tentative weight estimation
Operating empty weight estimation
Empty weight estimation
Payload weight estimation
Overall takeoff weight estimation
7. Airfoil selection
8. Wing loading estimation
Based on stall velocity
Based on Landing distance
Calculation of wing area
9. Thrust to weight ratio estimation
Based on takeoff distance
Based on max rate of climb
Based on max velocity
Calculation of thrust
10.Power plant selection
11.Performance curves
16
LITERATURE SURVEY
17
LITERATURE SURVEY
It’s the collection of data of various airplanes to consolidate the data for the
airplane that we design. Around 22 airplanes with their design parameters are
compared.
AIRCRAFT FOR REFERENCE:
Falcon F16
Sukhoi -30
MIG 29
Thunderbolt A10
Eurofighter typhoon
Chengdu J10
Harrier
Raptor F22
Mirrage 2000D
Rafale
Super hornet F18
Gripen
Tejas
Eagle F15
Mitsubishi F2
CAC F7
Finback F8
FBC
Jaguar
AMX
Lightning F35
Sukhoi 25
FALCON 16
18
S.NO PARAMETER VALUE
1. Max Take off weight(kg) 19,200
2. Wing loading(kg/m2) 431
3. Wing span(m) 9.96
4. Thrust(kN) 127
5. Thrust to weight ratio 1.095
6. Cruise speed(mach no) 2
7. Rate of climb(m/min) 15240
8. Service ceiling(m) 18000
9. Range(km) 3222.5
10. Crew 1
11. Climb speed(km/hr) 2414
SUKHOI 30
19
S.NO PARAMETER VALUE
1. Max Take off weight(kg) 44350
2. Wing loading(kg/m2) 401
3. Wing span(m) 14.69
4. Thrust(kN) 83.4
5. Thrust to weight ratio 1
6. Cruise speed(mach no) 1.9
7. Rate of climb(m/min) 13800
8. Service ceiling(m) 17500
9. Range(km) 3000
10. Crew 2
11. Climb speed(km/hr) 2280.4
MIG 29
20
S.NO PARAMETER VALUE
1. Max Take off weight(kg) 15300
2. Wing loading(kg/m2) 442
3. Wing span(m) 11.1
4. Thrust(kN) 86.4
5. Thrust to weight ratio 1.09
6. Cruise speed(mach no) 2.25
7. Rate of climb(m/min) 15120
8. Service ceiling(m) 18013
9. Range(km) 1430
10. Crew 1
11. Climb speed(km/hr) 2430.1
THUNDERBOLT A10
21
S.NO PARAMETER VALUE
1. Max Take off weight(kg) 23133.2
2. Wing loading(kg/m2) 482
3. Wing span(m) 17.6
4. Thrust(kN) 40.34
5. Thrust to weight ratio 0.36
6. Cruise speed(mach no) 1.65
7. Rate of climb(m/min) 1828.8
8. Service ceiling(m) 13700
9. Range(km) 1287.48
10. Crew 1
11. Climb speed(km/hr) 675.9
TYPHOON
22
S.NO PARAMETER VALUE
1. Max Take off weight(kg) 23500
2. Wing loading(kg/m2) 312
3. Wing span(m) 10.95
4. Thrust(kN) 90
5. Thrust to weight ratio 1.15
6. Cruise speed(mach no) 2
7. Rate of climb(m/min) 18897.6
8. Service ceiling(m) 19810
9. Range(km) 2900
10. Crew 1
11. Climb speed(km/hr) 2386.7
F22 RAPTOR
23
S.NO PARAMETER VALUE
1. Max Take off weight(kg) 27216
2. Wing loading(kg/m2) 348.7
3. Wing span(m) 13.56
4. Thrust(kN) 155.7
5. Thrust to weight ratio 1.09
6. Cruise speed(mach no) 2.25
7. Rate of climb(m/min)
8. Service ceiling(m) 15240
9. Range(km) 2960
10. Crew 1
11. Climb speed(km/hr) 2449.42
MIRRAGE
24
S.NO PARAMETER VALUE
1. Max Take off weight(kg) 17500
2. Wing loading(kg/m2) 414.6
3. Wing span(m) 9.13
4. Thrust(kN) 64.3
5. Thrust to weight ratio 0.91
6. Cruise speed(mach no) 2.2
7. Rate of climb(m/min) 17068.8
8. Service ceiling(m) 17060
9. Range(km) 1550
10. Crew 1
11. Climb speed(km/hr)
HORNET
25
S.NO PARAMETER VALUE
1. Max Take off weight(kg) 25401.2
2. Wing loading(kg/m2) 454
3. Wing span(m) 12.3
4. Thrust(kN) 80.1
5. Thrust to weight ratio 0.96
6. Cruise speed(mach no) 1.8
7. Rate of climb(m/min) 13716
8. Service ceiling(m) 75240
9. Range(km) 2000
10. Crew 1
11. Climb speed(km/hr)
DASSAULT RAFALE
26
S.NO PARAMETER VALUE
1. Max Take off weight(kg) 24500
2. Wing loading(kg/m2) 536.1
3. Wing span(m) 10.8
4. Thrust(kN) 133.5
5. Thrust to weight ratio 1.1
6. Cruise speed(mach no) 1.8
7. Rate of climb(m/min) 18290
8. Service ceiling(m) 16800
9. Range(km) 3700
10. Crew 1
11. Climb speed(km/hr) 1390.47
GRPPEN
27
S.NO PARAMETER VALUE
1. Max Take off weight(kg) 14000
2. Wing loading(kg/m2) 283
3. Wing span(m) 8.4
4. Thrust(kN) 80
5. Thrust to weight ratio 0.97
6. Cruise speed(mach no) 2
7. Rate of climb(m/min)
8. Service ceiling(m) 15240
9. Range(km) 1430
10. Crew 2
11. Climb speed(km/hr) 1408.2
28
COMPARATIVE DATA SHEET
COMPARATIVE DATA SHEET
29
AIRCRAFT
NAME
Max T/O
WEIGHT
(kg)
WING
LOADING
(kg/m2)
WING
SPAN
(m)
THRUST
(kN)
T/W
RATIO
CRUISE
SPEED
(mach
no)
RATE
OF
CLIMB
(m/min)
SERVIC
E
CEILING
(m)
RANGE
(km)
CREW CLIMB
SPEED
(km/hr)
FALCON F16 19200 431 9.96 127 1.095 2 15240 18000 3222.5 1 2414
SUKHOI 30 44350 401 14.69 83.4 1 1.9 13800 17500 3000 2 2280.4
MIG 29 15300 442 11 98.79 1.09 2.25 15120 18013 1676 1 2430.1
THUNDERBOLT
A10
25133.2 482 17.56 40.34 0.36 1.65 1828.8 13700 1287.48 1 675.9
EUROFIGHTER
TYPHOON
23500 312 10.96 90 1.15 2 18897.6 19810 2900 1 2386.7
RAPTOR F22 27216 348.7 13.56 155.7 1.09 2.25 15240 2960 1 2449.42
MIRAGE 2000D 17500 414.6 9.13 64.3 0.91 2.2 17068.8 17060 1550 1
RAFALE 24500 536.1 10.8 133.5 1.1 1.8 18290 16800 3700 2 1390.47
HORNET F18 25401.2 454 12.3 80.1 0.96 1.8 13716 15240 2000 2
GRIPEN 14000 283 8.4 80 0.97 2 15240 1430 2 1408.2
30
DESIGN GRAPHS
31
CLIMB SPEED VS CRUISE SPEED
RANGE VS CRUISE SPEED
32
RATE OF CLIMB VS CRUISE SPEED
SERVICE CEILING VS CRUISE SPEED
33
TAKE OFF WEIGHT VS CRUISE SPEED
THRUST TO WEIGHT RATIO VS CRUISE SPEED
34
THRUST VS CRUISE SPEED
WING LOADING VS CRUISE SPEED
35
WING SPAN VS CRUISE SPEED
36
MISSION PROFILE
37
CONSOLIDATED DATA
1. NAME : BATTLE
2. RANGE : 2000km
3. CREW : 1
4. MACH NO : 2
5. SERVICE CELING : 17000 m
6. CLIMB SPEED : 1875 km/hr
7. RATE OF CLIMB : 25.42 m/s
8. T/W RATIO : 1
9. THRUST : 90 KN with aft/burn
10.WING SPAN : 11.25 m
11.WING LOADING : 335 kg/m2
12.TAKE OFF WEIGHT : 2000 kg
38
WEIGHT ESTIMATION
39
AIM: To estimate the following parameters of our conceptual design
1. Gross/take-off weight(WTO)2. Em pty weight (WE)3. Mission fuel weight(WE)
PROCESS IN WEIGHT ESTIMATION Process begins with guess take-off weight from consolidate data The payload weight is determined from the requirements Fuel required for the mission is calculated as fraction of the guess
take-off weight WF = WF(used) + WF(res)
WF(used) =(1-Mff)(WTO)guess
WF(res) =25%of WF(used)
Tentative value of empty weight is calculated using WE(tent) =(WTO)guess - WPL-Wcrew-WF-WTFO
WTFO =0.5% of (WTO)guess
The tentative empty weight is compared with allowable empty weight, which is given by the formula referred from Roshkam
(WE)allowable=Antilog10[log10(WTO)guess-A/B] Improved guesses are then made and iterations processed until
convergence.
CATEGORIES OF WEIGHT OF AN AIRPLANECREW WEIGHT (WCREW) The crew comprises the people necessary to operate the airplane in flight. For our airplane the crew is simply the trainer and the trainee.
PAYLOAD WEIGHT (WPL) The payload is what the airplane is intended to transport passenger, baggage, freight etc. if the airplane is intended for military combat use. The payload includes bombs, rockets and other disposable ordnance.
40
FUEL WEIGHT(WF) This is the weight of the fuel in the fuel tanks. Since fuel is consumed during the course of the flight, WF is variable, decreasing with time during the flight.
EMPTY WEIGHT(WE) This is the weight of everything else the structure, engines(with all accessory equipment), electronic equipment (including radar, computers, communication devices etc), landing gear, fixed equipment (seats, galleys, etc) and anything else that is not crew, payload or fuel WE =WME+WFEQ
WME =Manufacturer’s empty weight WFEQ=Fixed equipment weight
TAKE OFF GROSS WEIGHT(WTO) It is the weight of the airplane at the instant it begins its mission. It includes the weight of all the fuel on board at the beginning of the flight, hence WTO= WCrew + WPL + WF + WE
Where WF is the weight of the full load at the beginning of the flight
MISSION SPECIFICATION: Pay load: bombs, carried externally and 907kg of ammunition and 4535 kg bombs Crew: one pilot Cruise speed: Mach 2 at sea level Strafe : 5 min Take off and landing: ground of less than x at sea level and a x day Power plants: two turbo fan engines Certification base : military
Phase 1 : engine start and warm up
41
Begin weight is wto . end weight is w1 the fuel fraction for this phase is by above definition given by w1/wTO From the suggested fuel fraction table for military fighters W1/wTO = 0.99
Phase 2: TAXIBegin weight is w1. End weight is w2. The fuel fraction for this phase is w2/w1 .From the suggested fuel fraction for military fighters W2/w1 = 0.99
Phase 3: Take offBegin weight is w2. End weight is w3. The fuel fraction for this phase is w2/w1 .From the suggested fuel fraction for military fighters W3/w2 = 0.99
Phase 4: climbBegin weight is w3. End weight is w4. The fuel fraction for this phase is w2/w1 .From the suggested fuel fraction for military fighters ECR = [1/CJ]CR[L/D]cr ln[w4/w3] E=(S/C)/(R/C)= 17000/25.42 =668.7 668.7 =3600/0.8(10)ln(W3/W4) W4/w3 = 0.985
Phase 5: cruiseBegin weight is w4. End weight is w5. The ratio w5/w4 can be estimated from breguet’s range formula which can be written as followsFor jet airplanes RCR = [V/CJ]CR[L/D]cr ln[w4/w5] 600*103 = [(2*340.47*3600)/0.6]*7ln(W4/W5) W5/W4 = 0.979
Phase6: loiterBegin weight is w5. End weight is w6. The fuel fraction for this phase is w6/w5
From the suggested fuel fraction for military fighters W6/W5 = 0.967
Phase7: Descent
42
Begin weight is W6. End weight is W7. The fuel fraction for this phase is W7/W6
From the suggested fuel fraction for military fighters W7/W6 = 0.99
Phase8: Dash-outBegin weight is W7. End weight is W8. The fuel fraction for this phase is W8/W7
R = [V/CJ][L/D] ln[w7/w8] 200*103 = [(2*340.47*3600)/0.9](4.5)ln(W7/W8) W8/W7 = 0.983
Phase9: Drop BombsBegin weight is W8. End weight is W9. The fuel fraction for this phase is W9/W8
From the suggested fuel fraction for military fighters W9/W8 = 1NOTE: the bomb load is 4535.92 kg. The total fuel fraction upto this point is found as Mff(1-9) = W9/W8*………….*W1/WTO = 0.891 Wf(1-8) = 0.891*22000 =19602 kg 19602-4535.92= 15066.08 kg
Phase10: Strafe Begin weight is W9. End weight is W10. The fuel fraction for this phase is W10/W9. Strafing time is 5 minutes. Assuming that uring strafing phase maximum military thrust is used.
E = [1/CJ][L/D] ln[w9/w10] E =300s, cj=0.9, L/D=4.5 300=3600*4.5/0.9ln(w9/w10)
W10/W9=0.983Weight correction: 15066.08/19602 = 0.769 W10/W9 =(1-(1-0.983)0.769) =0.987
Phase11: Dash-inBegin weight is W10. End weight is W11. The fuel fraction for this phase is W11/W10
R = [V/CJ][L/D] ln[w7/w8] 200*103 = [(2*340.47*3600)/0.9](4.5)ln(W11/W10) W11/W10 =0.929
43
Weight correction: 14809.96/15066 = 0.983 W10/W9 =(1-(1-0.929)0.983) =0.93
Phase12: ClimbBegin weight is w11. End weight is w12. The fuel fraction for this phase is w12/w11.From the suggested fuel fraction for military fighters ECR = [1/CJ]CR[L/D]cr ln[w11/w12] E=(S/C)/(R/C)= 17000/25.42 =668.7 668.7 =3600/0.8(10)ln(W11/W12) W12/w11 = 0.98
Phase13: Cruise inBegin weight is w12. End weight is w13. The fuel fraction for this phase is w13/w12.
M=2.2 , Cj=0.6, L/D=7.5 R=6OOkm RCR = [V/CJ]CR[L/D]cr ln[w12/w13] 600*103 = [(2.2*340.47*3600)/0.6]*7ln(W12/W13) W13/W12 = 0.948
Phase14: DescentBegin weight is w13. End weight is w14. The fuel fraction for this phase is w14/w13.From the suggested fuel fraction for military fighters w14/w13 = 0.99
Phase15: Landing, Taxi, Shut downBegin weight is w14. End weight is w15. The fuel fraction for this phase is w15/w14.From the suggested fuel fraction for military fighters w15/w14=0.995Mff = w15/w14 * w14/w15*………………. W1/wTO
= 0.995*0.99*0.948*0.98*0.93*0.983*0.891Mff =0.745WF(used)=(1-Mff)WTO
=(1-0.745)22000 =5610kgWF =WF(used)+WF(reserve)
=5610(1-25)
44
=7102.5kgWOE =WE+WTFO+ Wcrew =8000+0.05(7102.5) +90.7 =8441.325kgWTO =WOE+WF+WPL
=8441.325+7102.5+5442WTO =20985.83kgWE(tent) =WTO-WPL-Wcrew-WF-WTFW
=22000-5442-90.7-7102.5-0.05(7102)WE(tent)=9104.175Verification using Roskam GraphWE =9070 kgPercentage error = [(9104.175-9070)/9070]*100% = 0.38% WTO =22000kg WF =7102.5kg WE =9104.175 kg
45
46
AIRFOIL SELECTION
47
NACA 65-410
Thickness: 10.0%Camber: 2.2%Trailing edge angle: 9.2o
Lower flatness: 77.6%
Leading edge radius: 1.1%Max CL: 1.015Max CL angle: 11.0Max L/D: 41.272Max L/D angle: 3.5Max L/D CL: 0.798Stall angle: 3.5Zero-lift angle: -3.0
48
49
NACA 65-210
Thickness: 10.0%Camber: 1.1%Trailing edge angle: 9.3o
Lower flatness: 63.2%Leading edge radius: 1.1%Max CL: 0.85Max CL angle: 11.5
Max L/D: 31.146
Max L/D angle: 3.0
Max L/D CL: 0.547
Stall angle: 3.0Zero-lift angle: -1.5
50
51
WING LOADING CALCULATION
52
WING LOADING
CONSTRAINTS:
Through Vstall
Through landing distance
USING Vstall:
= 0.5*1.2256*(68.33)2(1/1.345)
=313.75 kg/m2
53
USING LANDING DISTANCE
R = V2/0.2g
= (1.15* 61.11)2/(0.2*9.81)
= 2517.22m hf = R(1-cosθa) θa = 3W , R=2517.22 hf = 3.449m sa = (50- hf)/tanθa
sa = 225.1m sf = Rsinθa
sf = 131.74m
Landing distance = sa+ sf+ sg
Sg = Landing distance – sa- sf
= 450-225.1-131.74 Sg = 93.16m Also, sg = jN[(2/ρ∞)(w/s)(1/cLmax)](1/2)
Where j = 1.14 N= 3 µ= 0.04 (w/s)= 347.52 kg/m2
Therefore, Using Vstall (W/S) = 313.75 kg/m2
Using landing distance (W/S) =347.52 kg/m2
54
THRUST TO WEIGHT RATIO
55
THRUST TO WEIGHT RATIO
To determine wing loading three constraints are used. They are,
Take-off distance Rate of climb Maximum velocity
USING TAKE OFFDISTANCE:
Sg = [1.21(W/S)]/(g ρ∞(CLmax)(T/W) = (1.21*313.75*9.81)/(9.81*1.2256*1.345*[t/w]) Sg = 255.1/(T/W) Vstall = 61.11m/s R = [6.96(Vstall)2]/9.81 θob = cos-1(1-(hob/R)) θob = 5.103 sa = Rsinθob
sa = 235.65 sg + sa = Takeoff distance
183.29/(T/W)+235.65=500 T/W = 0.693
56
USING RATE OF CLIMB:
(R/C)max =219.72m/s CDO =0.03ρ∞ =1.2256W/S =313.75kg/m2
(L/D)max = 8.26 Z = 2.011 (T/W) =2.68USING Vmax:W4/WTO = W4/W3*W3/W2*W2/W1*W1/WTO
=0.985*0.99*0.99*0.99 =0.956 W4 =21026.83kg Wmc/W4 =0.5(1+[W5/W4]) =(1+0.979)/2 =0.9895 Wmc =0.9895*21026.83 =20805.6kg Wmc/S =20805.6/70.11 =296.75
AT Cruise alt 17000m ρ = 0.1402kg/m3
T/Wmc=0.5 ρ∞ V∞2(CDO/[W/S])+(2K[W/S])/( ρ∞V∞
2) T/Wmc=2.09
57
ENGINE SELECTION
58
ENGINE SELECTION
From the critical performance parameter estimation, we have thrust to weight ratio, T/W =0.693Where , T = thrust required (TR) W = Take off gross weight (WTO) TR = 0.693*(22000*9.81) TR =149.56kN (Twin engine)It is found that , for our conceptual design, thrust required is above 149.56kN. so it isrequired to select a engine which has a thrust ranging 148 kN-150kN. Name of the engine = Pratt & Whitney PW 1215G No/: of engines = 2 Thrust available = 67-76 kN (per engine)
General characteristics
Type: Turbofan Diameter: 1,422–2,057 millimetres (56.0–81.0 in) Bypass ratio: 9:1
Components
Compressor: Axial flow,1-stage geared fan, 2-3 stage LP, 8 stage HP Combustors: Annular combustion chamber Turbine: Axial, 2-stage HP, 3-stage LP
Performance
Maximum thrust: 14,000–23,000 lbf (62–100 kN)
59
PERFORMANCE CURVES
60
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 7000
0.020.040.060.080.1
0.120.140.16
V vs cl
Velocity in m/s
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 7000.0285
0.029
0.0295
0.03
0.0305
0.031
0.0315
0.032
0.0325
V vs cd
Velocity in m/s
61
CL
CD
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 7000
0.51
1.52
2.53
3.54
4.5
V vs l/d
Velocity in m/s
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 7000
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
V vs tr
Velocity in m/s
62
L/D
TR
HODOGRPH
63
THREE VIEW DIAGRAM
64
3 VIEW DIAGRAM
65
CONCLUSION
66
Design is a very fine nature of creating, here we designed a Multi Role Fighter with retrieved data. Design of anything needs experience and presence of mind , we learnt a lot about design characteristics, governing equations, science of aircraft .
67
REFERENCE:
BIBILIOGRAPHY:
1. Introduction to Flight – John .D.Anderson Jr. – Tata Mc Graw Hill 2010
2. Fundamentals of Aerodynamics - John.D.Anderson Jr – fifth edition - Tata Mc Graw Hill 2010
3. Aircraft Design Projects for engineering students - Lloyd R. Jenkinson - James F.
Marchman - third edition - Butterworth-Heinemann
WEBSITES:
1. www.naca/aerofoil.gov
2. www.worldaircraftdierctory.com
3. www.lockheedmartin.com
4. www.northropgrumman.com
5. www.sukhoi.org/eng
6. www.migavia.ru/eng
7. www.worldofkrauss.com
8. And other websites related to design of aircrafts.
68