adjacent segment disease cs v3

16
ASSESSMENT OF ADJACENT- SEGMENT DISEASE IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH CERVICAL FUSION OR ARTHROPLASTY: A PROSPECTIVE 2-YEAR STUDY CASE STUDY – CORY JENSEN

Upload: cory-jensen

Post on 13-Feb-2017

477 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Adjacent Segment Disease CS v3

ASSESSMENT OF ADJACENT-SEGMENT DISEASE IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH CERVICAL FUSION OR ARTHROPLASTY: A PROSPECTIVE 2-YEAR STUDY C A S E S T U D Y – C O R Y J E N S E N

Page 2: Adjacent Segment Disease CS v3

ADJACENT-SEGMENT DISEASE

Name: Assessment of Adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study

James T. Robertson – Dept. of Neurosurgery, Univ. of Tennessee Health Science Center

Stephen M. Papadopoulos – Barrow Neurological Inst., Phoenix, AZVincent C. Traynelis – Dept. of Neurosurgery, Univ. of Iowa, Iowa

City, Iowa

Page 3: Adjacent Segment Disease CS v3

GOAL/PURPOSE OF STUDY

To compare evidence of radiologically documented changes in adjacent-level cervical disc disease after a single level discectomy and cervical fusion.

Page 4: Adjacent Segment Disease CS v3

STUDY PARAMETERS

The goal of both was to treat the symptoms of DDD in the Cervical region. The majority of patients were single level herniated disk or spondylosis (degeneration of body).

Post-Op evidence that they were looking for:

New anterior osteophytes Enlargement of existing osteophytes Narrowing of adjacent disc space >30%

Page 5: Adjacent Segment Disease CS v3

HOW WAS THE STUDY (OSTEO)CONDUCTED?

Compared the outcomes of patients using the Affinity Cervical Cage system, and the Bryan Artificial Cervical disc.

Examined Radiography for signs of Adjacent-Level Disk disease

New anterior osteophyte formation, increased narrowing of an interspace, new DDD, and calcification of the anterior longitudinal ligament.

Page 6: Adjacent Segment Disease CS v3

HOW WAS THE STUDY (OSTEO)CONDUCTED?

• Affinity Cage study started 2/15/97, and the last patient was treated 11/15/98.

• The Bryan Study started January 2000, and the last patient follow up review was June 2004.

• The patients were examined 24 months post-op to examine results

Page 7: Adjacent Segment Disease CS v3

COMPARATIVE X-RAYS

Bryan Artificial Cervical disc.Normal Anterior Single-Level Fusion

Page 8: Adjacent Segment Disease CS v3

WHAT DID THEY DO?

Single-level Cervical Discectomy for patients with single level herniated disk or spondylosis producing radiculopathy and/or myelopathy from c2-3 to c7-t1.

103 patients used the Bryan Artificial Cervical Disk 103 patients ranging from 28-97 yrs old. Mean age of 55.9 61 women 41 men158 patients used the Affinity Cervical Cage system

78 men, mean 45.5 80 women, mean 44

Page 9: Adjacent Segment Disease CS v3

AFFINITY CERVICAL CAGE SYSTEM

• The AFFINITY® system uses a simple, easy-to-implant threaded cage, indicated for single-level ACDF’s

• Its tapered design provides for optimal restoration of normal cervical Lordosis

Page 10: Adjacent Segment Disease CS v3

BRYAN ARTIFICIAL CERVICAL DISC

• Designed to closely act as a Vertebral disk

• Not intended for fusion• Created to keep natural

motion of the spine

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8N7PB12Xefg

Page 11: Adjacent Segment Disease CS v3

BRYAN ARTIFICIAL CERVICAL DISC

Page 12: Adjacent Segment Disease CS v3

COMPARISON/OUTCOME

• Radiological review demonstrated new anterior osteophyte formation in 17.8% of Affinity cage, and 10.8% of Bryan Disc.

• Osteophyte enlargement was documented in 8.9% of Affinity patients, 0% for Bryan System

• Increase in DDD was present in 3.8% of Affinity, 4% Bryan

• New DDD was 1.9% Affinity, 1.3% Bryan• DDD is based off >30% increase in disc narrowing• New radiographic changes – 34.6% Affinity, 17.5%

Bryan

Page 13: Adjacent Segment Disease CS v3

COMPARISON/OUTCOME

• For Affinity 85% of new osteophytes appeared in superior space, 15% inferior

• For Bryan, only 1 inferior osteophyte was produced • Symptomatic DDD occurred in 7% using the Affinity

system, 0 for Bryan• 11 Adjacent herniated discs happened with Affinity,

1 for Bryan System• Medical treatment was needed in 33% of Affinity

cases for neck, shoulder, and/or arm pain. 1.3% for Bryan.

• For Bryan, only 1 patient required adjacent-level surgery for symptomatic disc disease.

Page 14: Adjacent Segment Disease CS v3

CONCLUSION OF STUDY• Advocates of procedures in which an anterior

discectomy is followed by a moveable prosthesis has found that preserving motion will eliminate or diminish the prevalence of adjacent-level DD.

• This study shows that arthrodesis is very commonly followed by radiographic changes of adjacent-level disease.

• Based on the radiographic and clinical evidence, it appears that maintaining motion (Bryan) after a single level anterior discectomy will delay or prevent symptomatic disc disease, and will decrease to a significant degree the adjacent-level DD.

Page 15: Adjacent Segment Disease CS v3

CONCLUSION OF STUDY

• Also, fusion is associated with a morbidity rate of 6.4% from non-union. Repeat operation needed.

• Based on the radiographic and clinical evidence, it appears that maintaining motion (Bryan) after a single level anterior discectomy will delay or prevent symptomatic disc disease, and will decrease to a significant degree the adjacent-level DD.

Page 16: Adjacent Segment Disease CS v3

THINGS TO CONSIDERDisclosure: Dr. Robertson is the Medical Director of the Cervical Division of

Medtronic Sofamor Danek. Drs. Papadopoulos and Traynelis are Consultants of Medtronic

Sofamor Danek.

Was the Study well done? Yes Strict qualifications to join the study created an even playing field

Bryan – Started at 103, ended at 74 Affinity Cage – Started at 202 ended at 158 Eliminated for pre-existing conditions and prior spine surgeries