adaptation 2008 childs 151 2

Upload: liana-vargas-fernandes

Post on 03-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Adaptation 2008 Childs 151 2

    1/2

    Adaptation Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 151152

    The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press.

    All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected] 151

    FILM REVIEW

    AtonementThe Surface of Things

    Atonement. Dir. Joe Wright. Perf. Kiera Knightley, James McAvoy, and

    Vanessa Redgrave, 2007.

    Ian McEwans self-consciously literary 2001 novel concerns itself with maladaptation

    and the processes of apology when there is no mechanism for seeking forgiveness. From

    its carefully realized opening recreation of the Tallis familys country house in the 1930s,

    Joe Wrights film accordingly highlights misperception and the failure of empathy. We

    are offered, as in the novel, two perspectives on the Jamesian seminal scene of figures

    beside a fountain, where a complex love triangle comes to the boil one hot June day

    when a vase is broken and Cecilia Tallis (Kiera Knightley) strips off to retrieve a brokenpiece from the water. A first perspective is that of the 13-year-old Briony Tallis (Saoirse

    Ronan) watching from behind one of the houses upper windows and a second is that

    shared by the two figures, housekeepers son Robbie Turner (James McAvoy) and

    Cecilia. Here as elsewhere, the film pointedly shows contrasting viewpoints, and at the

    end of the second true telling of the fountain scene the camera focuses on the fantasist

    Briony, who looks steadily at the viewer and invites our complicity or sympathy.

    This double-telling and double-taking, playing false perception against esse est percipi,

    is repeated in Robbie and Cecilias later library sex scene, again witnessed by Briony.

    Both scenes in fact imitate the lesson of the two letters that Robbie writes to Cecilia: shehas seen the wrong version, Robbie says, because his sexually explicit typed note was

    never meant to be read; which is doubly true in that it was certainly never meant to be

    read by Briony. That texts and perceptions are versions is underlined repeatedly, draw-

    ing attention to the films status as adaptation, a visually realized rendition of Brionys

    final but not faithful version of events.

    That Briony has watched the seminal fountain scene from behind glass feeds into a

    series of identity motifs concerned with water, mirrors, and the transparency of barri-

    ers: as when Cecilia jumps into the country houses lake to swim and the ensuing shot

    reveals Robbie surfacing in a tub of bathwater; soon afterwards, we are shown Brionywriting a romance about a lady in a lake and Sir Romulus the most dangerous man in

    the world. Later, after her false accusation of him for the sexual attack on Lola, Briony

    again watches from a window as Robbie is taken away by the police a man she has

    condemned but will never be able to rescue, as she once forced him to rescue her by

    pretending to drown.

    The rescue attempt by the sea at Dunkirk forms the backdrop to the middle section

    of the film, introduced as Northern France 4 years later. This is the story of Robbies

    post-prison military duty, after which, he repeatedly says, the story can resume, just as

    Cecilias parallel refrain to him is Come back to me. The emphasis, however, is onfailure and betrayal of the lovers once more, exemplified by the chaos Robbie finds on

    the beach and the 300,000 men waiting there to be taken hometo resume their

    stories. Though not revealed until later, Robbie in fact dies here of septicaemia,

    presumably as a result of the chest wound we see him prod earlier; an officer has already

    atFundaoCoordenaodeAperfeioamentodePessoaldeN-velSuperioronA

    ugust12,2013

    http://adaptation.oxfordjou

    rnals.org/

    Downloade

    dfrom

    http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/
  • 8/12/2019 Adaptation 2008 Childs 151 2

    2/2

    152 PETER CHILDS

    told him that the wounded are to be left behind. Prior to his death, Robbie hallucinates

    a scene in which his mother bathes his feet, intimating his role as Christlike class martyr

    sacrificed by Briony as the Dunkirk soldiers seem to be offered up for death or salvation.

    He says repeatedly I have to get back to put things right, a further indication that it is

    Brionys regretful words issuing from his mouth.

    Faithful to the novels structure, the third section of the film is London 3 weeks ear-

    lier, and the clicking of a typewriter returns over the soundtrack as a 17-year-old

    Briony (Romola Garai) looks out at London from a hospital window. To emphasize her

    authorial role, as she walks along the St. Thomas ward corridor each of the lights above

    clicks on to the sound of typewriter keys being struck. Briony has by now begun to write

    her story, Two Figures by a Fountain and her job as a nurse appears as penance too.

    When soldiers come in from the British Expeditionary Force in France, Briony imagines

    she sees Robbie, then a propaganda newsreel chronicles the tragedy of Dunkirk, which

    is retold as not retreat and failure but a victory of retrieval, like the one Briony attempts

    through her fictional account of Robbie and Cecilias reunion.

    The films coda, set in the present, departs most sharply from the novel, presumably

    to foreground its own medium. With nods to the opening scene of reminiscence in

    Joseph Loseys film adaptation (scripted by Harold Pinter) of L. P. Hartleys novel, The

    Go-Between, a key intertext for McEwans story, Briony (Vanessa Redgrave) is interviewed

    in a television studio about the publication of her latest novel,Atonement. She is dying of

    vascular dementia and this will be her last novel, as it was also the first she ever drafted.

    She is now losing her memory, but says I wrote several drafts as far back as my time at

    St. Thomass hospital. She declares that she cannot see what good would be served byrecounting the truth, and so her novel invents a happy future for her loversthough

    Robbie died beside Brae dunes and Cecilia was killed later that year. Underscoring the

    dominant water imagery, Cecilia is shown drowned in the flooded tube station, killed by

    the bomb that destroyed the Balham gas water mains. What satisfaction could a reader

    derive from such an ending?, Briony asks; and her final act of kindness is to give them

    their happiness through fiction. So, the film closes with a projected fantasy of Robbie

    and Cecilia as lovers embracing on a beach, bringing Christopher Hamptons in-many-

    ways fine adaptation to a clichd romantic closure that both washes over the hardness

    in McEwans novel and the war deaths atAtonements centre.Yet, the most surprising aspect to Wrights film is the retention of Brionys position

    as novelist, which leaves the status of the film we have watched somewhat unclear. The

    postmodern twist in the novel reveals the previous narrative as one draft, the final ver-

    sion, of Brionys novel, yet the film we have seen can only figure once more as a version

    of that novel, and this is a dimension to the adaptation the film fails to explain or

    explore.

    REFERENCESHartley, L. P. The Go-Between. London: Hamish Hamilton, 1953.

    McEwan, Ian.Atonement. London: Jonathan Cape, 2001.

    The Go-Between. Dir. Joseph Losey. Perf. Julie Christie, Alan Bates. EMI, 1970.

    Professor Peter Childs

    doi: 10.1093/adaptation/apn017 University of Gloucestershire

    atFundaoCoordenaodeAperfeioamentodePessoaldeN-velSuperioronA

    ugust12,2013

    http://adaptation.oxfordjou

    rnals.org/

    Downloade

    dfrom

    http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/http://adaptation.oxfordjournals.org/