adaptable futures - a 21st century challenge

5
This paper presents the current thinking of Adaptable Futures research group based at Loughborough University through a series of diagrams. The aim of the Adaptable Futures project is to facilitate the development of adaptable buildings through research and real-life application. The investigation looks to make clear Adaptability as a defin- able design characteristic with a principle consciousness towards time and layers. Adaptability - the capacity to change the building’s built-environment in order to respond and fit to the evolving demands of its users/ environment maximizing value throughout its lifecycle. Time - the design consideration that buildings are dynamic systems that interact with a set of evolving endogenous and exogenous demands that require a capacity to accommodate change (space, function, and componentry) over time. Layers – the design consideration regarding the organization and interfaces between components of varying life spans and functions. The diagrams encapsulate a web of inter-related dimensions which tell a story of our exploration into understanding adaptability. They construct a framework and mark a beginning into generating a toolset for thinking about adapt- ability. Appendix 1 is an index for the complete set of diagrams used by the project. FUNCTION SPACE COMPONENTRY TIME Policy and Brief (e.g. legislation, client needs) Rules, Strategies, and Products (e.g. guidance, good practice) What ifs (scenarios) Technical solutions (new or pre-existing) Design Intelligence (e.g. knowledge, experience) Built solutions (buildings, products) The process of extending the life of our built environment DfAD Unbuilt solutions (abandoned schemes, unbuilt projects, budget cuts) Distributed at Changing Roles Conference, Rotterdam 10/09 “A sustainable building is not one that must last forever, but one that can easily adapt to change.” - Peter Graham, Environment Design Guide, 2006, Royal Institute of Australian Architects Figure 1: Perspectives Figure 2: Process Perspectives (figure 1) regards the inclusion of time into the design consciousness. Moving beyond form-based to a time-based design. There are two distinct camps when considering time in design. The typical one focuses on the durability and aging of materials with the intent that the building will ‘age’ well. The second and not often addressed acknolwedges time pertaining to building performance and the evovling demands a building has to be able to accommodate. The current push to develop more sustainable places to live and work must consider buildings not as finished works of perfection removed from time, but as imperfect objects whose forms evolve to fit shifts in society through time. This reality forces the designer to engage more actively into the web of demands (political, economical, social, techno- logical, legal, and environmental) placed on buildings. Process (figure 2) diagrams the cycle which the sources (figure 3)operate over time within the design process. Ultimately, some solutions will materialize while others will be abandoned and stored as design intelli- gence for future use. Sources (figure 3) outlines the origins for which adapt- ability can manifest itself through – strategies, rules, policy, products, or design intelligence. The categories are not realized in isolation, but help provide clarity for communication. Their organization relates to the degree in which they are bound in time. The Adapting Ables table (Table 1) links the strategies to stakeholders, scale, time and layers. For clarity, each Robert Schmidt III, Toru Eguchi, Simon Austin, and Alistair Gibb Adaptable Futures Research Group, Loughborough University Adaptable Futures: A 21st Century Challenge Distributed as a Keynote Paper at Changing Roles - New Roles, New Challenges Noordwijk AAN ZEE, The Netherlands, 5-9 October 2009

Upload: ioana-suceava

Post on 18-Dec-2015

35 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Adaptable Futures - A 21st Century Challenge

TRANSCRIPT

  • This paper presents the current thinking of Adaptable Futures research group based at Loughborough University through a series of diagrams. The aim of the Adaptable Futures project is to facilitate the development of adaptable buildings through research and real-life application. The investigation looks to make clear Adaptability as a defin-able design characteristic with a principle consciousness towards time and layers.

    Adaptability - the capacity to change the buildings built-environment in order to respond and fit to the evolving demands of its users/ environment maximizing value throughout its lifecycle.

    Time - the design consideration that buildings are dynamic systems that interact with a set of evolving endogenous and exogenous demands that require a capacity to accommodate change (space, function, and componentry) over time.

    Layers the design consideration regarding the organization and interfaces between components of varying life spans and functions.

    The diagrams encapsulate a web of inter-related dimensions which tell a story of our exploration into understanding adaptability. They construct a framework and mark a beginning into generating a toolset for thinking about adapt-ability. Appendix 1 is an index for the complete set of diagrams used by the project.

    FUNCTIONSPACE

    COMPONENTRYTIME

    Policy and Brief (e.g. legislation, client

    needs)

    Rules, Strategies, and Products

    (e.g. guidance, good practice)

    What ifs (scenarios)Technical solutions

    (new or pre-existing)

    Design Intelligence (e.g. knowledge,

    experience)

    Builtsolutions

    (buildings, products)

    The process of extending the life of our built

    environment

    DfAD

    Unbuiltsolutions

    (abandoned schemes, unbuilt projects,

    budget cuts)

    Distributed at Changing Roles Conference, Rotterdam 10/09

    A sustainable building is not one that must last forever, but one that can easily adapt to change. - Peter Graham, Environment Design Guide, 2006, Royal Institute of Australian Architects

    Figure 1: Perspectives

    Figure 2: Process

    Perspectives (figure 1) regards the inclusion of time into the design consciousness. Moving beyond form-based to a time-based design. There are two distinct camps when considering time in design. The typical one focuses on the durability and aging of materials with the intent that the building will age well. The second and not often addressed acknolwedges time pertaining to building performance and the evovling demands a building has to be able to accommodate.

    The current push to develop more sustainable places to live and work must consider buildings not as finished works of perfection removed from time, but as imperfect objects whose forms evolve to fit shifts in society through time. This reality forces the designer to engage more actively into the web of demands (political, economical, social, techno-logical, legal, and environmental) placed on buildings.

    Process (figure 2) diagrams the cycle which the sources (figure 3)operate over time within the design process. Ultimately, some solutions will materialize while others will be abandoned and stored as design intelli-gence for future use.

    Sources (figure 3) outlines the origins for which adapt-ability can manifest itself through strategies, rules, policy, products, or design intelligence. The categories are not realized in isolation, but help provide clarity for communication. Their organization relates to the degree in which they are bound in time.

    The Adapting Ables table (Table 1) links the strategies to stakeholders, scale, time and layers. For clarity, each

    Robert Schmidt III, Toru Eguchi, Simon Austin, and Alistair GibbAdaptable Futures Research Group, Loughborough University

    Adaptable Futures: A 21st Century Challenge

    Distributed as a Keynote Paper at Changing Roles - New Roles, New Challenges Noordwijk AAN ZEE, The Netherlands, 5-9 October 2009

  • adaptablefuturesextending the life of our built environment

    Strategies for how the building endures change over time.

    Convertable RefittableVersatile Scalable Movable(space) (function)

    Adjustable(task) (performance)(size) (location)

    StrategiesTechnical or system solutions for how the building endures

    change over time.

    iso standardspre-designed products

    standard details

    ProductsCritical physical parameters which

    allow the building the capacity for a range of appropriate uses beyond the specificity of its original use.

    SpatialStructurephysical

    relationship either through constraint,

    boundry, or adjacency

    transfering of physical load either

    vertically or horizontally/ directly

    or indirectly

    Servicetransfering of a

    material element which services the

    habitability/ function of the building

    Rulesthe reuse of knowledge - proven and

    plausible concepts, components, methods, and processes benefiting design cost and time , existing processes, and inventories.

    SolutionsProtocolsrules,

    procedures

    Experienceseducation, past

    work

    Philosophiesideologies, ethos prototypes, mock

    ups, design models

    Toolssoftware,

    construction techniques

    Design Intelligence

    Tax on demolitionTax on use of new resources

    Guidelines for designersIndustry guidance

    planning regulationsGovernment-led incentives

    building regulations

    PolicyLegal framework for industry through

    taxes, regulations and incentives which either enable or impede the

    process of building adaptability.

    Timeless Timebound

    Distributed at Changing Roles Conference, Rotterdam 10/09

    Figure 3: Sources

    Table 1: Adapting ables

  • Distributed at Changing Roles Conference, Rotterdam 10/09

    MAGNITUDE OF CHANGE

    FREQUENCYOF CHANGE

    HIGH

    HIGHLOW

    LOW

    LOCATION

    TASK

    strategy is defined by a type of change which allows for a decision maker and built environment scale to be associated with each strategy. In general, the strategies operate on different cycles and affect different layers of the building. The magnitude and frequency of the types of changes tend to act inversely (Figure 4).

    Specifity (figure 5) shows varying levels of specificity driving a building to be a specific response each time. The levels move from Level 1 (all enclosed spaces) to Level 5 (a very individual response). The industry operates with a tendency to build for a specific use, client, and site each contributing and moving further away from a set of general principles. The more specific a building becomes to a particular set of demands at a fixed point in time the more limited its capacity to respond to changes.

    Figure 4: Changemeter

    level 01

    level 02

    level 03

    level 04

    level 05

    A F

    A

    A

    A

    A

    B C D F

    G

    Building(all buildings;

    enclosed space)

    Use Range(a similar range of

    building demands)

    Specific Use(use type)

    Specific Client(client specific needs)

    Specific Site(adapted to site

    conditions)

    K L O

    E

    1 2

    1a

    Unique

    Common

    Specific

    General

    Tens

    ion

    betw

    een

    two

    cont

    iniu

    ms

    Buildingcycle

    BusinesscycleBusinesscycle

    Businesscycle

    Businesscycle

    Buildingcycle

    Buildingcapacity

    Buildingcapacity

    (FIT AT LEVEL 05)(FIT AT LEVEL 02)

    Figure 5: Specficity

    Figure 6: Landscape

    Figure 7: Scales

    Figure 8: Influencers

    Scales (figure 7) lays out the varying levels of our built and organizational environments as a reference for understanding at what level and to what extent the dimensions operate at.

    Influencers (figure 8) is a diagram we are using to attempt to capture who/ what influences the decision making process for a building. For example, how much influence does the designer have with his own set of beliefs and experiences. How much impact/ push does the client or society have on the finished product?

    Many uses have a similar range of physical requirements which can classify them into use ranges (level 2 in Figure 5) which could allow convertability within that range. We also tend to associate a sense of uniqueness with specificity, where a more generic design tends to have less value and get labeled common. The evolution of a new built form is inevitable, but the capacity of that form to accommodate change dictates the forms performance ability and ultimately the length of its life - Land-scape (figure 6). The two lines represent varia-tions on the cycles of the built stock or land-scape. One indicates a building fit at level 2 and the other level 5 displaying a shorter cycle because of a limited capacity to respond to a single business cycle. On the other hand, the level 02 fit building can respond to three business cycles.

    Designer Practice Industry Society

    ORGANIZATIONAL SCALEMICRO MACRO

    Component Neighborhood RegionPart Building CityAssemblySystem

    BUILT-ENVIRONMENT SCALEMICRO MACRO

    Industry Client

    Society(government, global

    communities, future generations)

    (owner, funder, occupier, developer, local community)

    (designers, manufactuers, consrructors)

  • ada

    ptabledesign strategies

    Qui

    cker

    spee

    d to

    occ

    upat

    ion

    Sim

    plier

    de

    sign p

    rocess

    Faster

    design

    Quicker speed

    of construction Done Before Easier to sell/ lease Less Risk / Greater return Easier to adjust for chaning functions/ tasks Prolonged lifecycle Easier to resell/ lease Suits future change in size of use Better building performance Ea

    sier to as

    semble

    Easie

    r to up

    grad

    e Ea

    sier t

    o re

    loca

    te R

    eusa

    ble

    Ren

    ewab

    le R

    ecog

    nitio

    n ADAPTABLEcapable of altering its space, function,

    or components in order to respond to evolving demands

    kit of parts

    standard components

    prefabricated

    open span

    large spaces

    ceiling space movable partitions

    furniture type

    modules

    easy interfaces

    bus systems

    modular units

    inflatable

    easy connections

    oversized structure

    demountable

    collapsable

    / mobilemotile

    foldable

    deattachable

    regional materials

    renewable materials

    reusable parts

    trussed rafters

    product family

    parallel processes

    renewable services

    recycled materials

    system building

    insulated building

    biodegradable

    stackable units

    coordinated connections

    up-to-date services

    new technologies

    changable panels

    portable

    extendable

    types of changes over tim

    e

    ADJUSTABLEchange of task

    SCALABLEchange of size

    VERSATILEchange of space

    REFITABLEchange of components

    MOVABLEchange of location

    CONVERTIBLEchange of function

    Presenter and ProfessorAlistair [email protected]+44 (0) 1509 223097

    ResearcherRobert Schmidt [email protected]+44 (0) 1509 222897

    The framework presented in this paper is an ongoing development of the AF project. We are currently validating the framework through its application with a number of casestudy and partner projects. Thoughts, criticsms, etc. are all welcome.

    Brief

    Design

    Procurement

    Construction

    Sell / Rent / Lease

    Operate Operate

    Maintenance

    Upgrade / Major repairs

    Functional Adaptation

    Building Reuse

    Scrap & Build

    Financial Gapoption A

    Continual (sub-optimal) Use

    option B

    option D

    Sell

    option C

    Buy existing building

    Build new

    How much to invest initially?(what capacity will be built in)

    CDP 01

    How to handle an aged building?(sub-optimal for use)

    CDP 03

    How much to invest in upkeep?(what capacity will be kept)

    CDP 02(new site)

    (existing site)

    (early years first 5-10 years) (later years after 10 years)

    Lifecycle (figure 9) looks at the building througout its life and identifies critical decision points for investment (CDP 01 How much to invest initially?) and scenarios for action at the point in which funtional adaptation (potential convertibility) takes place.

    Framecycle (figure 10) places the strategies in a clock-like position indicating their potential to be used. Filtered inbetween the strategies are various solutions associated with the strate-gies, and around the outside list some of the benefits.

    Distributed at Changing Roles Conference, Rotterdam 10/09

    This paper and its contents are copyright and property of Loughborough University 2009

    Figure 10: Framecycle

    Figure 9: Lifecycle

    www.adaptablefutures.comContacts

  • PROJECT DIAGRAMS WPs AF DIMENSIONS

    extending the life of our built environment

    PROCESS

    LAYERS

    DEPENDENCIESPERSPECTIVES

    The process of extending the life of our built

    environment

    DfAD

    SOURCES

    FRAMECYCLE

    ABLES

    LANDSCAPE

    PERMUTATIONS

    SPECIFICITY

    SPECTRUMS

    PARADIGMTIME, LAYERS

    TIME, COMPONENTRY, FUNCTIONS, SPACE

    COMPONENTRY, STAKEHOLDERS, TIME

    COMPONENTRY, SPACE

    PERSPECTIVES (all), BENEFITS, COST

    PERSPECTIVES (all), BENEFITS, COST

    TIME, ECONOMICS, SCENARIOS

    STAKEHOLDERS, STRATEGIES

    STAKEHOLDERS

    DIMENSIONS

    SOURCES (all), TIME

    DESIGN INTELLIGENCE, STRATEGIES, RULES, POLICIES, PRODUCTS

    STRATEGIES, SCALE, TIME, LAYERS, STAKEHOLDERS

    STRATEGIES, PRODUCTS, BENEFITS, TIME

    FUNCTION

    TIME, SPECIFICITY

    STRATEGIES

    WP1AF FRAMEWORK WP2 AF PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE

    ____________

    A B

    FUNCTIONALTYPE RULES

    PARAMETER(PHYSICAL & SPATIAL)

    ADAPTABLESTRATEGY

    STRATEGYDEMANDS ANDRELATIONSHIPS

    PARAMETER(PHYSICAL & SPATIAL)

    RELATIONSHIPBETWEEN PHYSICAL AND

    SPATIAL PARAMETERS

    PARAMETER(SPATIAL)

    PARAMETER(PHYSICAL)

    INFLUENCERS

    BENEFITS

    LIFECYCLE

    ECONOMICS

    WLA

    CAPs

    STRATAMETERs

    CHANGEMETER

    RULEs

    WP4 AF LIFE CYCLE COSTING

    FREQUENCYOF

    CHANGE

    STRATEGYDEMANDS ANDRELATIONSHIPS

    MAGNITUDEOF CHANGE

    WPs AF TABLES

    WP5 AF BUSINESS CASE

    WP6 AF DESIGN PROCESS

    TIME

    SCALESSTAKEHOLDERS, COMPONENTRY

    FUNCTION, COMPONENTRY, SPACE

    COMPONENTRY, SPACE

    STRATEGIES, COMPONENTRY, SPACE

    MAGNITUDE, FREQUENCY

    VERIFICATIONCASESTUDIES DIMENSIONVERIFICATION ANDCATEGORIZATION

    SOURCES

    CASE STUDIES, SOURCES (all)

    Designer Practice Industry Society

    MICRO MACRO

    Component Neighborhood RegionPart Building CityAssemblySystem

    MICRO MACRO

    APPENDIX 1

    Distributed at Changing Roles Conference, Rotterdam 10/09

    Rotterdam_pg01b.pdfRotterdam_pg02b.pdfRotterdam_pg03.pdfRotterdam_pg05b.pdfRotterdam_pg06.pdf

    /ColorImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict > /GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile () /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False

    /Description > /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ > /FormElements false /GenerateStructure true /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles true /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /NA /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /LeaveUntagged /UseDocumentBleed false >> ]>> setdistillerparams> setpagedevice

    /ColorImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict > /GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile () /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False

    /Description > /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ > /FormElements false /GenerateStructure true /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles true /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /NA /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /LeaveUntagged /UseDocumentBleed false >> ]>> setdistillerparams> setpagedevice