adam fontecchio enrique alvarez chandrabhan sharma douglas gorham budapest, hungary
DESCRIPTION
IEEE’s Approach and Experience in Global Accreditation 2009 Global Colloquium on Engineering Education. Adam Fontecchio Enrique Alvarez Chandrabhan Sharma Douglas Gorham Budapest, Hungary 15 October 2009. A Few Words about IEEE. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
IEEE’s Approach and Experience in Global Accreditation
2009 Global Colloquium on Engineering Education
Adam FontecchioEnrique Alvarez
Chandrabhan SharmaDouglas Gorham
Budapest, Hungary15 October 2009
A Few Words about IEEE
IEEE is the largest multinational professional engineering association in the world – More than 375,000 members in over 150 countries– More than 45% of our members are outside the US– A non-profit organization incorporated in New York
Originally concentrating on power engineering and communications, IEEE at present spans technical interests across the spectrum of technology– From nanotechnology to oceanic engineering
In many respects IEEE has become “the steward of Engineering”
Total IEEE Membership1963 - 2006
1963 1973
1983
1993
2006
What is IEEE?A professional organization supporting the good of the profession and the public worldwide– Governed by its members– “The Profession” has evolved in an inter-disciplinary way to
include all fields of engineering, computing and technology
A major platform for vetting, disseminating, and guarding technical intellectual property (IP)
A mechanism to bring people of common technical interests together – both geographically and disciplinarily
A guardian of the future of Engineering, computing and technology
An implementer of technology-related public imperatives
What does IEEE do?Publishes literature in engineering, technology and computing – Over 140 periodicals and 800 conferences
Organizes conferences
Develops standards
Gets engineers and technologists from different locales together
Organizes professional activities among engineering students
Educates the public about Engineering
Why is IEEE interested in Accreditation? (1)
Accreditation has significant impact on the content of the curriculum in IEEE’s fields of interest– And hence on the future of the profession
IEEE’s involvement introduces the voice of the profession and its practitioners into the decision making process of educational institutions
Why is IEEE interested in Accreditation? (2)
IEEE considers accreditation a key vehicle to ensure active involvement of the Institute in maintaining the quality and relevance of engineering education
Accreditation is a strategic objective and IEEE supports accrediting bodies worldwide
– The IEEE BoD allocates funds and human resources to accreditation on an annual basis
About 500 volunteers $1.5M/year in direct expenditures
IEEE Committee on Global Accreditation Activities (CGAA)
CGAA: Mission and Scope
To identify and meet the accreditation needs of the profession, by assisting in the establishment, operation, development and implementation of accrediting bodies and accreditation procedures in engineering, computing and technology (ECT) worldwide.
To coordinate transnational accreditation activities on behalf of the IEEE, including
– assistance to existing accrediting bodies– development of new accrediting bodies– education about ECT accreditation
IEEE Accreditation Activities
Engineering, Computing and Technology (ECT) programs
Selected IEEE Accreditation Projects
IEEE’s position paper on accreditation– Selected components will be discussed shortly
IEEE’s position paper on the First Professional Degree in EngineeringWorking with ABET (formerly the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology)Assistance to emerging accrediting bodies and accreditation projects worldwide:– China, the Caribbean, and Peru
Accreditation.org– A comprehensive on-line resource on accrediting bodies and
mutual recognition agreements
IEEE Position Paper on Academic Accreditation in
Engineering, Computing and Technology
Adopted by the IEEE Board of Directors, November 2007
Purpose
The purpose of IEEE’s policy paper is to express IEEE’s view and intent on Accreditation – And guide our volunteers and colleagues
Uses and Misuses of Accreditation
“At its worst, accreditation can serve as a vehicle to entrench old traditions, perpetuate rigid prescriptions that inhibit innovation and progress, and act as a sinkhole for program resources that are devoted to over-elaborative preparations for accreditation visits rather than to improvement of education.”
Alternatives to Accreditationand Effects of Globalization
Discuss all means for quality assessmentConsider the effects of engineering labor migration on Accreditation
Remember - our profession is evolving…fastEducational institutions as well as professional associations and accrediting agencies may be too slow to catch upWhen we are slow to change, the marketplace often finds solutions without us
Scope of the Position
IEEE believes that all engineering and computer science programs leading to degree can and should be accredited– E.g., most programs leading to degrees such as
Bachelor of Science, Bachelor of Engineering, Master of Science, and Master of Engineering
“Accreditation should not hinge on, but rather be an input to the determination of whether or not program graduates are ready to practice, and at what level they can practice”
Professional Associations and IEEE
…ought to play a major role in accreditation, and bring to the process the viewpoint of the profession and the…volunteers
IEEE seeks a leadership position in all accrediting bodies worldwide which accredit programs within IEEE’s technical fields of interest
IEEE seeks to cooperate… in creating, maintaining, supporting and expanding accrediting bodies for programs in engineering and computer science
Core Values
Human rightsRespect for diversityFair treatment for all constituencies
“Diversity of aims and cultures cannot however be used to justify violation of human rights of members or prospective members of the learning community”
Economical Operation
Requirements imposed on programs should be made with the conviction that these are necessary to the accreditation process. – should be manageable and avoid placing an
undue burden on an institution or program.
Requirements should be revisited from time to time to ensure that they provide meaningful input to the accrediting body and the programs. The accreditation process should examine the primary issues and is not meant to be a complete, detailed, “360-view” inspection.
Transition to continuous processes
Declares a desire to… – Move from “discrete-time” to “continuous-
time” accreditation process Shorter visits at random time points
– Have more constituencies participate– Have transparency
International Accreditation
Favors the formation of national and regional accrediting bodies
Foresees the future formation of multi-national accrediting bodies
Strongly disfavors permanent arrangements that have the accreditation of programs in one country performed and approved by an accrediting body from another country or region
IEEE supports…mutual recognition agreements between accrediting agencies
Accreditation in the United States
Scope
IEEE is a founding society of ABET– Through former American Institute of Electrical Engineers
(AIEE)
IEEE is responsible for more than 775 programsIEEE participates in ABET activities as “IEEE” and through Computing Sciences Accreditation Board (CSAB)– The CS is 40% of CSAB– Very close cooperation between the two groups– 3+3 Board members
Approximately 350-400 IEEE volunteers are involved annually
IEEE Accreditation Activities outside the United States
International Accreditation by ABET
As a member of ABET, IEEE assists the ABET international accreditation program
However, IEEE believes that international accreditation by ABET should be used primarily as a temporary measure in the absence of local accreditation bodies
IEEE strongly favors the formation of local accrediting bodies that will replace in time the accreditation functions of ABET
Inventory of Activities
Regional workshops on “Trends in Accreditation”– In the past: Bangkok, Bratislava, Helsinki, Lima– We are seeking a venue for 2010
Assistance to existing accrediting bodiesFormation of new accrediting bodies– “follow the volunteers”– Address all aspects of ECT
Launching Accreditation.org
Where do we operate now?
China: “Working Group on Education in China” – First meeting: November 2006
Peru: ICACIT
12 English speaking countries in the Caribbean: CACET
International Accreditation: China
In 2006 we established an accreditation working group in China, in partnership with the Chinese Association for Science and Technology (CAST)– First Face-to-face meeting in November 2006
2007 Activities– A major workshop on engineering accreditation
in cooperation with CAST A translation of ABET accreditation materials into
Chinese was completed by EAB Meetings with decision makers from various ministries
2008 Activities
An accreditation workshop with CAST and the PRC Ministry of Education– Beijing, 22 March 2008
240 attendees – All fields of engineering
Conducted by two IEEE volunteers: Michael Lightner and Moshe Kam
Key observations from the 2008 workshop
Attendees wanted to know how the ABET system works …but also what elements are difficult, expensive, time consuming
– Concern about the volume of work associated with ABET-style accreditation visits
– Desire to examine models that are not purely outcome based
Post-workshop requests
CAST requested that IEEE assist Chinese program evaluators to observe ABET visits in 2008– We coordinated the effort with ABET– Visits took place during Fall 2008
2009 Status
China is getting ready to apply to become a provisional member of the "Washington Accord“
Target is fall 2009
Pending issues:– Several internal organizational issues– Role of "Center for Engineering Education"
formed in Tsinghua University. – Issues related to Taiwan
Next Step: "International Engineering Education Conference"
on 21-22 October 2009
Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society Society of Automotive Engineers of ChinaChinese Society for Electrical EngineeringChina Electro-technical SocietyChina Instruments and Control SocietyChinese Institute of ElectronicsChina Computer FederationChina Highway & Transportation SocietyChinese Society for Corrosion and Protection
"International Engineering Education Conference" on 21-22
October 2009
Invited speakers are at a high level– including ministers and presidents– Representatives from 12 Washington Accord members
and 5 provisory members
A round table seminar and a “Beijing Statement”
IEEE was invited to give a keynote address and to give a session presentation
Accreditation.org
A New Portal on Accreditation (1)
Explanation of accreditation, the accreditation process, basic terminology
A list with links to all recognized accrediting bodies in the world– Including the programs they accredit– A university search capability
tied with TryEngineering.org
www.Accreditation.org
A New Portal on Accreditation (2)
Mutual recognition agreements– Who has signed them– Full text– Common interpretation– What does this agreement mean to you?
Selected bibliography
www.Accreditation.org
Creating an Accreditation Body in Peru Without Any
Previous Experience: The ICACIT Story
Enrique E. AlvarezICACIT Vice-ChairIEEE R9 Director
Value Chain
Accreditation
Continues
Improvement
Process
Quality
Assurance
Capacity
Building
Sustainable
Economic
Development
Gov
erm
ent
Com
pani
es
Aca
dem
ia
Alignment of GoalsP
rofe
sion
al
Org
aniz
atio
n
Why is accreditation needed?
We realized that engaged professionals have contributed to the development of the country.But we did not have enough engaged professionals to continue this progress.Several educational institutions have appeared in the last decade without knowing their real capacity to educate.ICACIT was created in 2001
Previous efforts
The National Assembly of Rectors wanted to develop a recommendation, to include criteria, for an accreditation body.No conclusion was reachedbecause of the lack of agreement between the parties, resulting in no agreement among the Rectors.This clearly demonstrated that those who will be evaluated cannot create their own evaluation criteria and cannot evaluate themselves.
Previous efforts
When ICACIT was created no rules existed regarding accreditation of programs except for medical careers.
Establishing ICACIT
In a meeting of the IEEE Foundationourfounder, Eng. José “Pepe” Valdez, learnedaboutaccreditation and itspurpose and value.Understandingtheimportance of accreditation, he requestedthesupport of IEEE tohelpusto:– Create a Peruvianaccreditationbody.– Contact ABET.
ICACIT organizerscamefromthebusinessside.
Establishing ICACIT
To create ICACIT we needed to solve some initial issues:– Understand accreditation – Determine the level of interest of engineering
and technical programs (including applied sciences and computing sciences)
– Create an organizational structure and find the people to operate the organization
– Create a financial model suitable for private and public universities
– Establish our own procedures– Train our own evaluators
IEEE support
IEEE sentseveralvolunteerstodevelop and conductworkshopstoexplainthepurpose of accreditation and the ABET criteriaIEEE supportedthetravel of 19 universityeducatorstoparticipate in accreditationprocesses in the USA (with ABET criteria) and Mexico (with CACEI criteria)IEEE helped in establishingtheconnectionwith ABET tofacilitatethesigning of an MOU withthecommitment of ABET togiveauthorizationto use theircriteria.Finally, IEEE supported ICACIT in developingourownguidelines.Alltheabove at IEEE’s expense.
Explaining what accreditation means
We worked with the program deans emphasizing that the main purpose of accreditation is to have a continuous improvement process.We stressed that one key step is to learn how to conduct the self study.Usually the programs know the outcomes and objectives but, how to achieve them?The self study will determine were they are, and after that they will know how to achieve the outcomes and objectives.
The marketing issues of accreditation
Programs use accreditation as a marketing tool saying “Accredited Program”But more relevant was the recognition of their graduates to have studied in an accreditated program, improving the chances to find work as a metric to be shown to the stakeholders.As said before, to have a process to improve continually is recognized as a competitive tool.
Creating the structure
To create the organizational structure we needed to involve the stakeholders, and key persons in the programs to be evaluated.
Creating the structure (initial)
General Assembly
Directive Council
Coordination Committee forAcreditation of
Education Institutions
Permanent Advisory Committee Tecnical Accreditation Council
UNI PUCP UPC USMP TECSUP
Creating the structure (initial)
It is relevant to mention that the General Assembly is represented by several institutions including: CONFIEP and professional institutions as Colegio de Ingenieros, IEEE Peru Section, APESOFT, APIThe reason to include some education institutions as part of the chart is to sensitize key people with accreditation issues.
Creating the structure (updated)
Creating a financial model
The initial vision of universities was that it was too expensive to be involved in accreditation processes.For that reason, universities initially paid a symbolic annual fee to participate in the activities of ICACIT, such as the monthly meeting and workshops.Now, universities pay for the training courses and the evaluation.
Developing our own procedures
We utilized several sources:– Information from ABET (that was agreed in
the MOU)– Information supplied by IEEE EAB (that
included the translation of very important documents)
– We hired professionals from academia and industry to develop the final version of the ICACIT procedures
Preparing our own evaluators
This was one of our most critical issues to solve.To begin evaluating we needed to have experienced evaluators but without previous evaluation visits we did not have any experienced evaluatorsWe begin doing the evaluations with observation teams sent by ABET, as part of our MOU.With several evaluations done we began to gain the experience required.
Current regulations
The Law N° 28740 (May 2006) regulates the process of accreditation (of programs), evaluation and certification (of persons) creating several institutions for the National System for Evaluation, Accreditation and Certification for Educational Quality, SINEACEIt includes the creation of three boards:– CONEAU for university programs– CONEACES for non university programs– IPEBA for schools (high and elementary)
According to this law, SINEACE authorizes the operation of accrediting bodies.This institution is the issuing of accreditation certificates.
History of ICACIT
ICACIT was created in 2001 with a pilot project including 5 educational institutions The idea is to obtain experience in this process that can be replicated with other institutions.Now we have 13 educational institutions included in the program.Up to now we have accreditated 3 programs; 1 with TECSUP and 2 with UPCComing in October and November, 2009 we are scheduled to evaluate 15 programs:• 5 in PUCP, Lima.• 1 in UPC, Lima.• 3 in USMP, Lima.• 3 in TECSUP, Lima.• 2 in TECSUP, Arequipa.• 1 in CIBERTEC, Lima.
Lessons learned
We should have identified the program evaluators sooner.We should have developed links with similar accrediting bodies in Latin America.We should have defined our procedures and made them known to educational institutions, sooner.Establishing closer relationships with authorities related to accreditation issues, early in the development of ICACIT, would have been beneficial.
Future
We are working on the consolidation of ICACIT to be recognized as the accrediting body for technical and engineering programs in Peru, by the education authorities and by the education institutionsWe are working to complete the needed requirements to be included in the Washington Accord
Formation of the Caribbean Accreditation Council for Engineering
and Technology
(CACET)
Chandrabhan Sharma
Interim Chair
Accreditation in the English Speaking Caribbean
The various islands have a similar British History
The educational background is the same
Historically (since 1962) the UWI (the only regional University) Faculty of Engineering was the main source of Engineering Graduates
Because many of the Graduates went to UK, there was a need for equivalency with British standards.The British accreditating bodies were used as the source for accreditation ie. IEE (IET), IStructE, IMechE, IChemE.This has changed, now most engineering graduates go to USAMany new universities have developed. Need for a different process.
About ten years ago there was a move by the Caribbean Engineering fraternity to establish an engineering accreditation agency.
Project funded by the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA)
Attempts to form a Regional Accrediting Agency
Executed by the Jamaica Institution of Engineers (JIE) and the Professional Engineers Registration Board (PERB)
Council of Caribbean Engineering Organizations (CCEO) was involved
On the wider regional level the Pan American Academy of Engineering organized a forum on "Accreditation in the Regional Context" in Montevideo, Uruguay, on October 8-10, 2003
The Organization of American States (OAS) sponsored a similar workshop in Lima, Peru in 2005
Both meetings were attended by representatives from the CARICOM region and the wider Caribbean.
What is CARICOM?
Out of the meeting in Peru a project was formulated but it has not yet got many countries on board, in part because of funding issues.
In 2007, on the launch of the IEEEtt section, I spoke with Pedro Ray (representing the PR Section) on the issue of Accreditation
He then referred me to Moshe Kam of the EAB
This started the development of Accreditation Body in the Caribbean
The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) offered to fully assist in this regard, through a project of the IEEE Section in Trinidad and Tobago and the Faculty of Engineering of The University of the West Indies.
At biennial meeting of the Washington Accord (in June, 2007) it was agreed that countries and regions would be encouraged to establish their own accreditation systemsOverseas programmes accredited by Washington Accord members would be mutually recognized.
The professional engineering associations in the region have all agreed to the establishment of a regional accreditation body.
Important that every CARICOM Country’s local accreditation agency and universities be on board as the former have the legal responsibility for accreditation and the latter are the institutions that need accreditation.
The IEEE held a workshop on “Engineering Accreditation” on September 21-22, 2007 at the Crowne Plaza, Wrightson Road, Port of Spain, Trinidad in collaboration with The Faculty of Engineering of The University of the West Indies (UWI) and the Accreditation Council of Trinidad and Tobago (ACTT).
The workshop was organized primarily to bring together the accreditation councils, professional bodies and universities of the AnglophoneCaribbean region as well as the CARICOM office responsible for accreditation.
The workshop was funded by the IEEE Educational Activities Boardand facilitated by Professor Moshe Kam, Vice President for Educational Activities of the IEEE and Dr. Mario Gonzales, Professor Emeritus and a very experienced ABET evaluator
The workshop was very well attended by all the relevant stakeholders - the engineering schools, professional bodies, accreditation agencies and the CARICOM Secretariat.
There was unanimity that a regional accreditation body for engineering and technology should be established.It was further agreed that a regional workshop in the first quarter of 2008 should be held in order to develop:
– strategy,– timeline, and – other requirements for the
establishment of such a body.
This follow-up workshop was held on7-8 April 2008 in Puerto Rico again IEEE funded and Managed
At this meeting 27 leaders of governmental accrediting agencies, licensing bodies, universities and professional associations of seven (7) English speaking Caribbean countries participated.
The output of our deliberations was a joint declaration for the formation of an indigenous Caribbean Accreditation Council for Engineering and Technology (CACET)
A Performa Budget/Financing estimate and a decision as to the Headquartering of CACET
Representatives of academia (one representative of each university that offers baccalaureate engineering degrees programmes) :UWI(University of the West IndiesUTEC(University of Technology)UTT(University of Trinidad and
Tobago)
Representative of Caribbean Area Network for Quality Assurance in Tertiary Education (CANQATE)
CARICOM
CCEO
IEEE representatives
:
Representatives of Professional Associations in nation states:
BarbadosTrinidad & TobagoOECS (Organisation of Eastern
Caribbean States)
GuyanaJamaica
STEERING COMMITTEE (INTERIM BOARD OF DIRECTORS)
A follow up meeting was held in Guyana on the 20 – 21 October.
This was also funded and managed by the IEEE
Again there was a region wide attendance by all stake-holders
Guyana being the headquarters of CARICOM: full attendance by relevant staff
Harmonizing of Engineering Acts throughout region. Five states currently have Acts regulating the engineering profession. CACET submitted comments to CARICOM for changes
Select and form Boards and Committees of CACET as required by the Washington Accord
Select evaluators and commence training sessions.
Sensitize engineering schools and local accreditation boards within region on CACET / Washington Accord
Develop all administrative documents required by CACET
Draw up a list of criteria for selecting evaluators
Identify individuals to staff committees
– Permanent Board - Finance, By-Laws/Regulations
– At least one accreditation council
– Pool of program evaluators - select evaluators and commence training
Next Meeting of CACET.
26 -28 November 2009.
IEEE continues to provide consulting, technical assistance and financial support for these efforts.
Objectives of This Meeting
Board of Directors Meeting to finalise:
a) The Charter and Operation Manual (COM)b) Financial Manual andc) The Accreditation Procedure Manual.
Conduct Programme Evaluator Training
Achievements
The Agreement all the Professional Bodies, CCEO, Educational Institutions, CARICOM and Industry in the English Speaking Caribbean to the establishment of CACET.
The Agreement of the various local state accreditation agencies, to support and approve CACET as the recognized regional Accrediting Agency for Engineering and Technology Programs
The formation of CACET, with agreement of all stakeholders, within a timeframe of two years!
Solidification of a good working relationship of the Engineering and Accrediting Professionals across the Caribbean
A sensitizing of the Region to the need for accrediting programs so as to make the engineering professionals internationally marketable.
GratitudeGratitude
Without the support of the IEEE, financially, in the development of documentation and logistics planning, CACET would have suffered an embryonic death
Like any new born, continued support is required throughout infancy and CACET looks forward to IEEE for its continued benevolence.
Thank You
Questions or Comments