activity-based costing and other cost management tools
DESCRIPTION
Activity-Based Costing and Other Cost Management Tools. Chapter 5. Objective 1. Develop departmental overhead rates and activity-based costs (ABC). Activity-Based Costing. A way to allocate indirect cost to production Focus – on activities and cost of activities - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved1
Activity-Based Costingand Other Cost
Management ToolsChapter 5
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved2
Objective 1
Develop departmental overhead rates and activity-based costs
(ABC)
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved3
Activity-Based Costing
• A way to allocate indirect cost to production
• Focus – on activities and cost of activities• Each activity has its own cost driver• Uses a separate allocation rate for each
activity
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved4
Activity-Based Costing
Steps:• Identify the activities• Estimate the total indirect costs of each
activity• Identify the allocation base for each
activity’s indirect costs (the primary cost driver)
• Estimate the total quantity of each allocation base
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved5
Activity-Based Costing
Steps:5. Compute cost allocation rate for each
activity(Estimated total indirect costs of activity ÷Estimated total quantity of cost allocation base)
6. Obtain actual quantity of each allocation base used by the cost object
7. Allocate indirect costs to cost object
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved6
Cost Drivers - examples
Activities: Cost Drivers:Material purchasing # of purchase ordersMaterial handling # of partsProduction scheduling # of batchesQuality inspections # of inspectionsPhotocopying # of pages copiedWarranty service # of service calls
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved7
E5-16
Steps:1. Identify each activity
– Material handling– Machine setup– Insertion of parts– Finishing
2. Estimate the total indirect costs of each activity
$12,0003,400
48,00080,000
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved8
E5-16Steps:3. Identify the allocation base for each activity’s
indirect costs (the primary cost driver)
Activity Budgeted cost Allocation base
Material handling $12,000 # of partsMachine setup 3,400 # of setupsInsertion of parts 48,000 # of partsFinishing 80,000 # finished direct labor
hoursTotal $143,400
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved9
E5-16
Steps:4. Estimate the total quantity of each allocation
base
Activity
Total Est.
Cost
Est. Quant. of Cost
Allocation Base
Mat. handling $12,000 ÷ 3,000 partsMachine setups $ 3,400 ÷ 10 setupsInsertion of parts $48,000 ÷ 3,000 partsFinishing $80,000 ÷ 2,000 hrs
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved10
E5-16
Steps:5. Compute cost allocation rate for each activity
Activity
Total Est.
Cost
Est. Quant. of Cost
Allocation Base
Cost Allocation Rate
Mat. handling $12,000 ÷ 3,000 parts = $ 4 per partMachine setups $ 3,400 ÷ 10 setups = $340 per setupInsertion of parts $48,000 ÷ 3,000 parts = $ 16 per partFinishing $80,000 ÷ 2,000 hrs = $ 40 per hour
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved11
E5-166. Obtain actual quantity of each allocation
base used by the cost object – 1,000 wheels
7. Allocate indirect costs to cost object Average quantities of cost allocation
bases used per fender:Parts: 3,000 ÷ 1,000 = 3Setups: 10 ÷ 1,000 = 0.01Finishing direct labor hrs: 2,000 ÷ 1,000 = 2
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved12
E5-16
Indirect Manufacturing Cost Per Fender
Activity
Actual Quant of Cost
Allocation Base Used per Fender
Cost Alloca-
tion Rate
Cost perFender
Mat. handling 3.00 $ 4.00 = $ 12.00Machine setups 0.01 $340.00 = 3.40Insertion of parts 3.00 $ 16.00 = 48.00Finishing 2.00 $ 40.00 = 80.00Total indirect
cost$143.40
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved13
E5-17Total Budgeted Indirect Manufacturing Cost
Activity
Actual Quant of Cost
Allocation Base Used per Fender
Cost Alloca-
tion Rate Total
Mat. handling 10,000 $ 3.75 = $37,500 Machine setups 30 $300.00 = 9,000 Insertion of parts
10,000 $ 24.00 = 240,000
Finishing 3,500 $ 50.00 = 175,000
Total budgeted indirect cost
$461,500
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved14
E5-17Indirect Manufacturing Cost Per Rim - Standard
ActivityCost Allocation
Rate
Quant of Cost Alloc. Base Used
Cost perRim
Mat. handling $3.75 4 = $ 15.00Machine setups $300 .015 = 4.50Insertion of parts $24 4 = 96.00Finishing $50 x 1 = 50.00Total indirect cost $165.50
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved15
E5-17Indirect Manufacturing Cost Per Rim - Deluxe
ActivityCost Allocation
Rate
Quant of Cost Alloc. Base Used
Cost perRim
Mat. handling $3.75 6 = $ 22.50Machine setups $300 .015 = 4.50Insertion of parts $24 6 = 144.00Finishing $50 x 2.5 = 125.00Total indirect cost $296.00
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved16
E5-17
Budgeted total indirect overhead cost $461,500
Budgeted direct labor hrs 5,000
Single allocation rate per $461,500direct labor hr 5,000
= $92.30
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved17
E5-17
Indirect manufacturing cost per wheel:Standard model:
2 $92.30 = $184.60Deluxe model:
3 $92.30 = $276.90
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved18
E5-17
EnkeIndirect Manufacturing Costs Per Unit
ModelStandard Deluxe
ABC costs $165.50 $296.00Single-rate costs $184.60 $276.90
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved19
Objective 2
Use activity-based management (ABM) to make business
decisions
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved20
Decisions
• Pricing and product mix• Cutting costs
– Value engineering – reevaluating activities to reduce costs while satisfying customer needs
• Routine Planning and Control Decisions– Create budgets– Evaluate workers
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved21
ABC in Merchandising and Service Companies
• Allocate period costs among product or service lines
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved22
E5-18Enke Company
ABC Data Gross Profits Standard DeluxeSale price $300.00 $440.00Direct materials 30.00 46.00Direct labor 45.00 50.00Indirect overhead 165.50 296.00Gross profit $59.50 $48
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved23
E5-18Enke Company
ABC Data Gross Profits Standard DeluxeSale price $300.00 $440.00Direct materials 30.00 46.00Direct labor 45.00 50.00Indirect overhead 184.60 276.90 Gross profit $40.40 $67.10
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved24
E5-18
Finishing activity cost per rim:2.0 hrs per rim x $40 per hour = $80 per rim
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved25
E5-18New cost of deluxe rim:Direct materials $46.00Direct labor 50.00Indirect costs:
Materials handling 22.50Machine setups 4.50Insertion parts 144.00Finishing 80.00
Total $347.00
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved26
Objective 3
Decide when ABC is most likely to pass the cost-benefit test
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved27
Cost-Benefit Test
• When the benefits of adopting ABC/ABM exceed the costs
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved28
E5-19
Indications that ABC might pass the cost-benefit test
• Enke produces two different products that use different amounts of the company's resources.
• Indirect manufacturing costs are a large portion of total costs.
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved29
E5-19
• Enke hired a new controller who should have the accounting expertise to develop an ABC system.
• Enke recently purchased bar coding information technology, which reduces the cost to keep track of allocation bases such as the number of parts.
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved30
E5-19
Warning signs that Enke's old cost system was "broken”:
• Managers cannot explain profits—despite switching to what should have been a more profitable product mix, profits were declining.
• Enke was using a direct-labor-based single allocation rate system developed 20 years ago.
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved31
E5-19
• Enke reengineered its production process but it had not changed its accounting system (until Babin developed the new ABC system).
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved32
Objective 4
Describe a just-in-time(JIT) production system, and
record its manufacturing costs
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved33
Just-in-Time SystemsReceive order from customer
Schedule production
Defect-free materials are delivered by suppliers just in time for production
Finished product is delivered to customer
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved34
Just-in-Time Systems
cutting
shapingsmoothing
grinding Finished Goods
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved35
Just-in-Time
• Production activities in self-contained cells• Short setup times• Broad employee roles• Small batches produced just in time• Shortened manufacturing cycle times• Emphasis on quality• Supply-chain management
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved36
Just-in-Time Costing
• “Backlash costing” – records cost of production when units are completed
• Inventory accounts – only two– Raw and In-Process Inventory– Finished Goods Inventory
• Manufacturing costs – only two– Direct materials– Conversion costs
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved37
Exercise 5-22GENERAL JOURNAL
DATE DESCRIPTION REF DEBIT CREDIT
(in millions)Raw & In Process Inventory 6,500
Accounts Payable6,500
Conversion Costs 7,420Various accounts
7,420
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved38
Exercise 5-22GENERAL JOURNAL
DATE DESCRIPTION REF DEBIT CREDIT
Finished Goods Inventory 11,200
Raw and In Process Inventory (200x$24)
4,800
Conversion Costs(200x$32)6,400
Cost of Goods Sold ($196x56) 10,976
Finished Goods Inventory10,976
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved39
Exercise 5-22
GENERAL JOURNALDATE DESCRIPTION REF DEBIT CREDIT
Cost of Goods Sold 1,020Conversion Costs
1,020
Conversion Costs7,420 6,400
Bal. 1,020
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved40
Exercise 5-22
Finished Goods Inventory
Beg bal 100 10,976 Goods sold
Bal. 324
Goods completed 11,200
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved41
Objective 5
Contrast the four types of quality costs and use them to make
decisions
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved42
Total Quality Management
Goals• To provide customers with superior
products and services• Continuous improvement
– Improve quality– Eliminate defects and waste
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved43
Types of Quality Costs
• Prevention costs – avoid poor quality goods or services– Employee training– Improved materials– Preventive maintenance
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved44
Types of Quality Costs
• Appraisal costs – detect poor quality goods or services– Inspection throughout production– Inspection of final product– Product testing
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved45
Types of Quality Costs
• Internal failure costs – avoid poor quality goods or services before delivery to customers– Production loss caused by downtime– Rejected product units
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved46
Types of Quality Costs
• External failure costs – when poor quality products are delivered to customers and company has to make things right with customer– Lost profits from lost customers– Warranty costs– Service costs at customer sites– Sales returns due to quality problems
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved47
E5-24
Prevention costs:• Training employees in TQM• Training suppliers in TQM• Identifying preferred suppliers who commit
to on-time delivery of perfect quality materials
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved48
E5-24
Appraisal costs:• Strength testing one item from each batch
of panels • Avoid inspection of raw materials
Internal failure costs:• Avoid rework and spoilage
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved49
E5-24
External failure costs:• Avoid lost profits from lost sales due to
disappointed customers• Avoid warranty costs
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved50
E5-24Costs of Adopting New Quality
Program:Prevention costs:
Training employees in TQM $ 30,000Training suppliers in TQM 40,000Identifying preferred suppliers 60,000
Appraisal costs:Strength testing 65,000
Total costs of adopting new program $195,000
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved51
E5-24Costs of Not Adopting New Quality Program:Appraisal costs:
Inspection of raw materials $ 45,000Internal failure costs:Rework and spoilage. 55,000External failure costs:
Lost profits from lost sales 90,000Warranty costs 15,000
Total costs of not adopting $205,000
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved52
End of Chapter 5