action research project: parents, students and teachers: stakeholders in positive behavior support...

41
Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter Yolanda Green & Robert Cooper II Superintendents Urban Principal Initiative Monday, June 9, 2008 Young Women’s Academy for Academic and Civic Development at Jan Mann

Upload: janel-cross

Post on 27-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT:

Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support

Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah CarterYolanda Green &Robert Cooper II

Superintendents Urban Principal Initiative

Monday, June 9, 2008

Young Women’s Academy for Academic and Civic Development at Jan Mann

Page 2: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Abstract of the Study

The focus of this action research was to improve reading achievement of the ninth grade students through the use of Differentiated Instruction and Positive Behavior Support as strategies during the last three grading quarters of the 2007 -2008 school year at The Young Women’s Academy for Academic and Civic Development at Jan Mann Opportunity School.

Page 3: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Introduction/BackgroundThe major goal of The Young Women’s Academy for Academic and Civic Development at Jan Mann Opportunity School is to provide a positive learning environment where students are motivated to alter negative behavior and improve academically and socially, so that they may be mainstreamed into a traditional school setting. The research indicates (Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Newsletter 2006) that school wide Positive Behavior Support is associated with decreased exclusionary, reactive and punitive discipline practices, increased student satisfaction and improved perceptions of school safety.

Page 4: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Introduction/Background Continued

In order to improve students’ academic achievement, teachers face many challenges in the classroom. Differentiated Instruction provides a way of thinking, a belief that students differ in their readiness to learn, and that the classroom and instructional time can be organized to meet the needs of diverse learners (Tools for Schools, Differentiated Instruction-A Tool for All Students, Resource Materials). The purpose of our project was to increase academic achievement through the implementation of Differentiated Instruction (DI) and The Positive Behavior Support (PBS) Program.

Page 5: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Background InformationThe Young Women’s Academy for AcademicAnd Civic Development(YWACAD) at Jan MannOpportunity Schoolwas constructed in 1994and is located on 44th Courtand 161st Street. The (YWACAD) at Jan MannOpportunity School has 26Classrooms.

•Student Demographics - 90% of the student population is Black non- Hispanic - 10% of the population is Hispanic - 0% White non-Hispanic - 0% Asian/Indian - 5% of the student population is enrolled in the Exceptional Student Education Program - 0% Limited English proficient Students (ESOL) - 93% of the student population are on free or reduced lunch - Target population included nine 9th grade students

Page 6: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Research Question

How will school wide implementation of The Positive Behavior Support Program (PBS) coupled with Differentiated Instruction (DI) increase ninth grade students’ academic achievement in reading?

Page 7: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Review of the Literature

1. Research indicates that the implementation of the PBS has decreased punitive discipline practices such as referrals and positively improved students thoughts of safety while increasing students academics. (Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Newsletter 2006)

2. Lane, K. (2007) found that the implementation of PBS has decreased both indoor and outdoor suspensions which subsequently increased the amount of student instructional time.

3. Scarpaci, R. (2006) indicated that students that were victims of violent school incidents avoided certain areas of school and activities as well.

Page 8: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

4. According to Turnbull, A. (2002) PBS implementation has the most successful results when three components are emphasized: Universal support; Group support; and Individual support.

5. Warren, J. (2006)in his evaluation of PBS found that not only did discipline referrals, indoor/outdoor suspensions, and violent incidents decline, the time spent on classroom instruction by teachers increased.

Review of the LiteratureContinued

Page 9: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Review of the LiteratureContinued

6. Differentiated instruction is the process of "ensuring that what a student learns, how he/she learns it, and how the student demonstrates what he/she has learned is a match for that student's readiness level, interests, and preferred mode of learning" (Tieso, 2003).

7. According to Tomlinson, C. A. (2003) …the use of Differentiated Instruction increases student motivation and task persistence because students can work with topics that are of personal interest. Modifying instruction to draw on student interests is likely to result in greater student engagement, higher levels of intrinsic motivation, higher student productivity, greater student autonomy, increased achievement, improved behavior and an improved sense of self-competence.

Page 10: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Review of the LiteratureContinued

8. The opportunity to learn in ways that make learning more efficient is also likely to make learning more effective. Attention to a student's preferred mode of learning or thinking promotes improved achievement (Odgers, S., Symons, A., & Mitchell, I. 2000) .

9. According to Thurlow, M. (2002) Differentiating instruction is not a passing fad; it is a revolution-a fundamentally different way to teach students with diverse learning and behavioral needs.

Page 11: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Review of the LiteratureContinued10. According to Lewis and Batts, when elementary teachers

relied largely on undifferentiated approaches to instruction, students had an overall 79% proficiency rate on state-mandated end- of-year tests. After 5 years of differentiating instruction, 94.8% of their students scored in the proficient range. Similarly, Fisher et al. documented that the average student in their high school read at a 5.9 grade level. After 4 years of differentiated instruction, the average student read at an 8.2 grade level.

Page 12: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Intervention

STEPS TAKEN FOR WHOM

BY WHOM

6 DI Professional Development Sessions

Staff AdministrationReading coachesDistrict

3 PBS Professional Development Sessions

9th Grade Students

Staff

AdministrationPBS Team

Page 13: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

InterventionContinued

STEPS TAKEN FOR WHOM

BY WHOM

Grading periodcomparison

9th Grade Students

AdministrationTeachers and Dept. Heads

Monthly Breakfast

Students recognized by teachers

Administration

Monthly Awards Students recognized by teachers

Administration

Page 14: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Intervention Continued

STEPS TAKEN

FOR WHOM BY WHOM

WeeklyPBS Falcon Funds incentives

Students recognized by teachers and administration

Teachers and Administration

PBS StoreWeekly

Students with Falcon Funds

AdministrationCareer Specialist

“Lady Pledge” All students Administration

Page 15: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

InterventionContinued

STEPS TAKEN

FOR WHOM

BY WHOM

Pre/Post Survey 9th Grade students

Administration

Teachers

Pre/Post Questionnaire

Teachers and parents

Administration

Page 16: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Data Collection

• Teacher Surveys Pre and Post • Student Surveys Pre and Post• Quarterly grade comparisons• Behavior referrals quarterly

comparisons

Page 17: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Analysis

The Student Pre - Survey indicated that 60% of the students were not satisfied with their academics and that improved conduct would increase their academic achievement.

Page 18: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Analysis Continued• Sixty percent of the Students’ Post

surveys indicated that Positive Behavior Modification has not increased their academic grades, however student behavior has improved.

• In addition, 70% of the students have indicated by surveys that Differentiated Instruction creates a sense of community in which they feel significant and respected.

Page 19: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Analysis Continued• The ninth grade Teachers’ Pre Survey indicates that the majority of them were not properly trained to teach Differentiated Instruction.

• The ninth grade Teachers’ Pre Survey indicates that the

majority of the them believed a new behavior modification program would only increase their workload and student’s behavior would not improve.

Page 20: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Analysis Continued• The ninth grade Teachers’ Post Survey indicated that

Professional Development has increased their ability to vary their instructional strategies to meet the needs of all students. Also, DI classroom-proven strategies empower them to target instructional modifications to the content, process, and products for students with learning disabilities and severe behavior problems.

• In addition, the ninth grade Teachers’ Post Survey indicated that Positive

Behavioral Support System uses proactive techniques to manage unwanted behaviors and has increased students active engagement in learning.

Page 21: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Analysis Continued

Reading Grades from the first grading period compared to the second grading period indicated that school wide implementation of PBS did not improve reading grades. (Note: 71% of the target group was affected by excessive absences).

Page 22: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Analysis Continued

Comparison of the amount of behavior referrals submitted during the first nine week grading period and the second indicated a 35% decrease.

Page 23: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Analysis Continued

Comparison of the amount of behavior referrals submitted during the 2nd nine week grading period and the third indicated a 42% decrease.

Page 24: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Pre -Survey Results

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

My school is safe

Can focus on academics

Conduct affects academics

Attendance affects academics

Been involved in conflict

Strongly Disagree Disagree Unsure Agree Strongly Agree

Page 25: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Pre- Survey Results continued

Student Survey

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

I Have input regarding rules

Improved attendance will improve grades

Improved conduct will improve grades

I am satisfied w/ my academics & grades

Strongly Disagree Disagree Unsure Agree Strongly Agree

Page 26: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Pre-Survey Results at a Glance 37.5% of the 9th Graders were unsure the

schools safety, while 37.5% strongly agreed that the school was safe.

37.5% of the 9th Graders agreed that they can concentrate on academics, while 50% strongly agreed.

37.5% of the 9th Graders disagreed that their conduct affected their academics, while 37.5% agreed that conduct affected their academics.

25% of the 9th Graders strongly disagreed that attendance affected their academics, while 37.5% agreed and 25% strongly agreed.

Page 27: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Pre-Survey Results at a Glance continued

37.5% of the 9th Graders agreed that they had been involved in a conflict, while 25% strongly agreed.

25% of the 9th Graders were unsure that they had input in regard to the school rules, while 67.5% agreed that they had input.

Page 28: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Pre-Survey Results at a Glance continued

37.5% of the 9th Graders agreed that improving their attendance improved their academics, while 25% strongly agreed.

50% of the 9th Graders agreed that improving their conduct would improve their grades, while 25% strongly agreed.

37.5% of the 9th Graders were unsure if they were satisfied with their academics and conduct, while 25% were satisfied.

Page 29: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Post-Survey Results

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

My school is safe

Can focus on academics

Conduct affects academics

Attendance affects academics

Been involved in conflict

Strongly Disagree Disagree Unsure Agree Strongly Agree

Page 30: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Post-Survey Results

Student Survey

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

I have input regarding rules

Improved attendance will improve grades

I am satisfied w/ my academics & grades

Strongly Disagree Disagree Unsure Agree Strongly Agree

Page 31: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Post-Survey Results at a Glance 37.5% of the 9th Graders agreed that

they had not been involved in a conflict, while 37.5% strongly agreed that they had not.

67.5% of the 9th Graders agreed that they had input in regard to the school rules.

37.5% of the 9th Graders agreed that improving their attendance improved their academics, while 37.5% strongly agreed.

Page 32: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Post-Survey Results at a Glance continued

50% of the 9th Graders agreed that improving their conduct would improve their grades, while 25% strongly agreed.

37.5% of the 9th Graders strongly agreed that they were not satisfied with their academics and conduct. While 37.5% agreed they weren't satisfied.

Page 33: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

9th Grade Reading Grades During the First 9 Weeks

56% of the 9th Grade failed reading the first nine weeks

22% of the ninth Grade received a C the first nine weeks

22% of the ninth Grade received a D the first nine weeks

Page 34: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

9th Grade Reading Grades During the Second 9 Weeks

29% of the 9th Grade failed reading the second nine weeks

71% of the ninth Grade received a C the second nine weeks

* Note: 71% of the target group grades were affected by excessive absences

Page 35: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

9th Grade Reading Grades During the Third 9 Weeks

79% of the 9th Grade failed reading the third nine weeks.

21% of the 9th Grade received a D the third nine weeks.

* Note: 71% of the target group grades were affected by excessive absences

Page 36: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Findings/Results

While the behavior did change which is indicative of the decrease in referrals and suspensions, the academic grades in reading did not improve.

Note: Attendance did adversely affect the findings.

Page 37: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Findings/Results Continued

The report card grades, District Interim Tests results, and teacher assessments indicated that there was no improvement in academic grades in reading. The impact of DI did not appear to increase the 9th grade students’ academic achievement in reading. However, the execution of the PBS program resulted in an increase in the improvement of positive behavior of 9th grade students as evidenced by the decline of referrals and suspensions.

Page 38: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Implications/Recommendations Due to the fact that students’ behavior has

shown positive improvement, the PBS program will be continued. Since the teachers received professional development in DI, they feel confident in implementing DI strategies in their classrooms. Although students’ report card grades did not reflect academic improvement in reading, DI strategies will continue to be used in the classroom because students, according to the survey, felt empowered when their teachers employed these strategies.

Page 39: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Implications/RecommendationsContinued

The incentives should be geared towards attendance in as much as classroom behavior. It is our belief that this would increase attendance thus increasing academic achievement.

Page 40: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

References Lane, K. (2007). Function Based Interventions for Students

Who Are Nonresponsive to Primary and Secondary Prevention Efforts: Illustrations at the Elementary and Middle School Levels. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. 15, 3-20.

The Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support – Website Newsletter 2006 Retrieved from http://www.pbis.org/newsletter.htm

Scarpaci, R. Bullying: Effective Strategies for Its Prevention.

(2006). Kappa Delta Pi Record. 42 , 170-174.

Turnbull, A. (2002). A Blueprint for Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support: Implementation of Three Components. Exceptional Children. 68, 377-402.

Warren, J. (2006). School- Wide Positive Behavior Support: Addressing Behavior Problems that Impede Student Learning. Educational Psychology Review. 18, 187-198.

Page 41: ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT: Parents, Students and Teachers: Stakeholders in Positive Behavior Support Dr. Betty Woodson, Professional Partner Deborah Carter

Lane, K. 2007

Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Newsletter 2006. Retrieve April 14, 2008. from www.education.state.mn.us.

Tieso, C. (2003). Ability grouping is not just tracking anymore. Roper Review, 26, 29-36.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Differentiating instruction for academic diversity. In J. M. Cooper (Ed.),

Classroom teaching skills, 7th ed (pp 149-180). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

References