acquisition vs learning

34
Language Acquisition vs. Learning a Language Magda Enriquez-Beitler One Click! Your Solution

Upload: magda-enriquezbeitler

Post on 12-May-2015

9.471 views

Category:

Education


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Acquisition vs learning

Language Acquisition vs.

Learning a Language

Magda Enriquez-BeitlerOne Click! Your Solution

Page 2: Acquisition vs learning

Communication is a pre-requisite for learning

Page 3: Acquisition vs learning
Page 4: Acquisition vs learning

Linguistic knowledge

Metalinguistic knowledge

Discussion

Page 5: Acquisition vs learning

The Behaviorist

Model

Page 6: Acquisition vs learning

The Chomsky

Revolution

Page 7: Acquisition vs learning

Several implications for instruction

Page 8: Acquisition vs learning

1 - The need for a Language acquisition-rich environment.

2- The learner needs to communicate and is pushed to communicate.

3 - There is abundant opportunity for negotiating meaning.

4- There is abundant opportunity for children to communicate in a social context.

Page 9: Acquisition vs learning

Krashen & The NaturalApproach

Page 10: Acquisition vs learning

Krashen focuses on

Input'interlanguage

+ 1' level =

Emotional preparedness for acquisition to take place

ComprehensibleInput

Page 11: Acquisition vs learning

THE NATURAL APPROACH

5 Hypothesis

Page 12: Acquisition vs learning

Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

1

"There are two independent ways of developing ability in second languages. 'Acquisition' is a subconscious process identical in all important ways to the process children utilize in acquiring their first language, ... [and] ‘learning’... [which is] a conscious process that results in 'knowing about' [the rules of] language" (Krashen 1985:1).

Page 13: Acquisition vs learning

Natural Order Hypothesis

2

The acquisition of grammatical structures proceeds in a predicted progression. Certain grammatical structures or morphemes are acquired before others in L1 acquisition and there is a similar natural order in L2

Page 14: Acquisition vs learning

Input Hypothesis

3

People acquire language best by understanding input that is a little beyond their present level of competence

Page 15: Acquisition vs learning

Monitor Hypothesis4

1.        Second language learners have two means for internalizing the target language:

1 - 'acquisition' which is a subconscious and intuitive process of constructing the system of a language. 2 - conscious learning process in which learners attend to form, figure out rules and are generally aware of their own process. The 'monitor' should play a minor role editing and making alterations or corrections as they are consciously perceived. Students should do as much acquiring as possible for the purpose of achieving communicative fluency. Krashen suggests three conditions for its use: ( 1)   there must be enough time( 2)   the focus must be on form and not on meaning (3)   the learner must know the rule

Page 16: Acquisition vs learning

Affective Filter Hypothesis

5

The learner's emotional state is like an adjustable filter which freely passes or hinders input necessary to acquisition. The filter is 'affective' because the factors which regulate its strength are self-confidence, motivation and anxiety state

Page 17: Acquisition vs learning

Characteristics of an Effective Program

Page 18: Acquisition vs learning

Supportive whole-school contexts

High expectations for language minority students

Frequentstudent interaction

Page 19: Acquisition vs learning

Intensive staff development programs

Expert instructional leaders and teachers

Teachers withhigh commitment

Page 20: Acquisition vs learning

Emphasis on functional communication

Organization of the instruction

Page 21: Acquisition vs learning

Principals supportive

of their instructional

staff and of teacher

autonomy

Page 22: Acquisition vs learning

Involvement of majority and minority parents

Page 23: Acquisition vs learning

The ESL Classroom

Page 24: Acquisition vs learning

Teachers adapt their language to the proficiency level of the students.

Teachers use English as the medium for providing content area instruction,

There are abundant opportunities for teachers and students to negotiate meaning.

Page 25: Acquisition vs learning

Instruction focuses on content rather than language.

Teachers use gestures and visual aids to help students understand.

Page 26: Acquisition vs learning

Principles operating in an ESL classroom

Page 27: Acquisition vs learning

Focus is on meaning rather than on form. There is no overt error correction. Linguistic modifications, such as simplified or caretaker speech and controlled vocabulary and sentence length are used.

Page 28: Acquisition vs learning

Subject matter concepts are presented using contextual clues, such as demonstrations, experiments, and map activities, to help convey meaning

Page 29: Acquisition vs learning

Conversational interaction is interesting and relevant to the students

Page 30: Acquisition vs learning

Components of an ESL Lesson

Page 31: Acquisition vs learning

Students are allowed a pre-speech stage or silent period and do not have to speak until they are ready (Krashen and Terrell 1983, Krashen 1984, 1985).

Page 32: Acquisition vs learning

All instruction is in English and is simplified to ensure comprehension.

Simple sentences are used with a set of already developed standard directions

Vocabulary is controlled

Page 33: Acquisition vs learning

The teacher should speak at his/her normal rate of speech, the pauses between sentence boundaries (i.e., where there would be a comma, period, or question mark if speech were written down) can be lengthened slightly. .

Emphasis is on the development of reading, writing, and thinking skills.

Page 34: Acquisition vs learning