acoustic trauma: minimum exposures to continuous noise...tts experiments had no pts after more...
TRANSCRIPT
2/20/19
1
AcousticTrauma:MinimumExposurestoContinuousNoise
RobertADobieElliottHBerger
NHCA;GrapevineTX,Feb8,2019
Howitstarted
• Berger:SingleMRIsession(evenw/HPDs)canleadtominimalTTS(ABR;Jinetal2018);canwepredictriskofPTSusingISO1999?
• Dobie:let’slookatDixWard’s(1991)paper• Berger:whydon’tyouupdateWard’sanalysisofacoustictraumaandpresentthisatNHCA?
• Dobie:whydon’tyou?• Berger:let’sdoittogether.
AnnalsofSurgery,1945
Definitions
2/20/19
2
AcousticTrauma• Olderauthors(and,sadly,evensomeofourcontemporarycolleagues):anyhearingchangecausedbynoise(temporary orpermanent,acuteorchronic)
• Currentusage:“asuddenchangeinhearingasaresultofasingleexposureto… sound”(ACOEM,1989,2002,2012)(Chadwick,Hinchcliffe,andGlorigpapersinOccupationalHearingLoss,ed.Robinson,1971)(Sataloff&Michael,HearingConservation,1973)
• OurreviewislimitedtopuretonePTSfromcontinuousnoise
Acoustictraumavs.“acousticshock”
• Recentpapers(Westcott2006;Hooper2014;Baguley etal2016)suggestthatsuddenunexpectedsoundsthatdon’tcausePTSareassociatedwith– Hyperacusis– Otalgia– Tinnitus– Dizziness– Sleepdisturbance
• MostlyfromclustersofcallcenteremployeesinAustralia,Denmark,andGB(socialcontagion?)
• Briefsounds,levels≥82dBA(McFerran &Baguley 2007)• Nodocumentedobjectivefindings
Ward1991;“HearingLossfromNoiseandMusic”PresentedatAudioEngineeringSociety.
“Bob–Itsurewouldbenicetobeabletoaddtothissparsecollectionofpoints,butsofewpeoplehavetheforesighttogetanaudiogrambeforeacoustictrauma.- Dix”
Ourgoalwastodojustthat.
2/20/19
3
Methods• Searchforpaperswithexposures(level,duration)andaudiometricevidenceofPTS(presentatleastoneweeklater)
• Sources:Ward1991references,RADandEHBownfiles(>6000PDFseach),otherref.lists
• PubMed(Human,English)– “acoustictrauma”OR(hearinglossAND(noiseORmusic)AND(suddenORacute))
– 577hits,only11metcriteriabasedontitle,abstract• Included19reMRI(nonedocumentingacoustictrauma)
Methods(cont.)
• AlsosearchedDefenseTechnicalInformationCenter,andqueried47colleagues
• Only9papersreportedacoustictraumawithexposuredataandaudiometry– 3fromWard1991review– 2fromPubMedsearch– 3fromauthors’files– 1fromreferencelistofpaperfromauthors’files
• PubMedmissedmostofthe9
9informativepapersDavisetal.1950 TTSexperimentLenarz &Gulzow 1983 AcousticreflextestArriaga&Luxford 1993 “Hunteretal.1999 “Elonka 1986 “Orchik etal.1987 CordlessphoneSingletonetal.1984 “Kung&Sataloff2006 SirenMcMillan&Kileny 1994 Bicyclehorn
2/20/19
4
Methods(cont.)
• Convertedlevelstoequivalentdiffusefieldlevels(dBA)forcomparabilitytoOSHA,NIOSH,etc.(methodsonrequest;wehopetopublish)
• Ambiguities– Durationssometimeshadtobeestimated– Offendingtone(reflextests)unclear;
chosetonewithhighestdBAlevel– Somelevelmeasurementmethodsunclear– Manyofourcaseslackedpeerreview
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
1 10 100 1000 10000
Equivalentdiffusefie
ldso
undlevel(dB
A)
Exposureduration(sec.)
bikehorn
siren
cordlessphone DavisTTSexperiments
acousticreflex
2.8hours
PTSfromsingleexposures
2/20/19
5
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
1 10 100 1000 10000
Equivalentdiffusefie
ldso
undlevel(dB
A)
Exposureduration(sec.)
OSHAPEL
PTSfromsingleexposures
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
1 10 100 1000 10000
Equivalentdiffusefie
ldso
undlevel(dB
A)
Exposureduration(sec.)
OSHAPEL
NIOSHREL
PTSfromsingleexposures
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
1 10 100 1000 10000
Equivalentdiffusefie
ldso
undlevel(dB
A)
Exposureduration(sec.)
OSHAPEL
NIOSHREL
??
??
Tentativelevels/durationscapableofcausingacoustictraumainmostsusceptible
2/20/19
6
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
1 10 100 1000 10000
Equivalentdiffusefie
ldso
undlevel(dB
A)
Exposureduration(sec.)
OSHAPELNIOSHREL
??
MRIexposures,LAeq andduration(highkurtosis)
Caveats
• Casereportsareanecdotal• Lowestlevelofmedicalevidence(belowrandomizedtrials,cohort,case-control,cross-sectional,caseseries)
• Specialcaseof“publicationbias”(resultscan’tberegardedastypical)
• Acoustictraumacasesmayrepresenttinyfractionofpopulation(mostsusceptible)
IntenseexposureswithnoPTS:4experiments(89Ss)andanaccident
(somehadverylargeTTS)
• Davisetal1950(n=19)• Eldredetal1955(n=10)• Schori 1976(n=40)• Brownson 1973(n=20)• Raleighetal1963(n=2,aftersteamlinerupture)
2/20/19
7
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
1 10 100 1000 10000
Equivalentdiffusefie
ldso
undlevel(dB
A)
Exposureduration(sec.)
PTSindividualcasesandNo-PTSgroups(N=2– 40)
Steamlinerupture
Pinknoise
Pinknoise
Tones,noises
jetenginenoise
CONCLUSIONS
• “Acoustictrauma”(AT)meanspermanentthresholdshiftafterasingleexposure,tobedistinguishedfromoccupationalNIHLandso-called“acousticshock”
• ATcanoccurinfewsecondsatlevels>130dBA,orafter10secondsatlevels>120dBA(ignoringoneoutlier)
• LackofATdoesnotmean“safe”(neuropathy?)• Acousticreflexcaseshadsignificantpriorhearingloss(whichiswhytheyrequiredsuchhighlevels)
2/20/19
8
CONCLUSIONS(cont.)
• ATexposureswereatypicalofindustrialnoise(tonalornarrow-band,probablymorehazardousdB-for-dBthanbroad-bandnoise)
• ReportedATcasesprobablyrepresentmostsusceptiblefractionofpopulation(89subjectsinTTSexperimentshadnoPTSaftermoresevereexposures)
• AllreportedATexposuresexceededOSHAlimits;ATisunlikelytooccurincompliantprogramsorafterMRIwithhearingprotection
Acknowledgment
• ChristianGiguere consultedremethodsofestimatingdiffusefieldlevelsfromHLs,couplerlevels,andmannequinlevels
• BillClarkconsultedrehistoricalliteratureinthefieldsofTTSandacoustictrauma
2/20/19
9
HypotheticaldistributionofTTS2 aftersingleintensebriefexposure
051015253545
RaresubjectwithTTS2 of50to60dB,thenPTS(acoustictrauma)?
051015253545
1in1000withPTS