acoustic emission of sand - damtp · packing fraction revisited ... related to friction...
TRANSCRIPT
2
Lecture 3: Statics of granular media
A pile of grains that does not move…
– What is happening inside?
Statics:
Photo-elastic particles
Packing fraction revisited (bidisperse mixtures, tapping)
Force chains
Internal stresses & transmission of force
Stresses in a silo (Janssen effect)
Pressure under a pile
Effect of humidity
Angle of repose
Notes: http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/nv253/, click on “Teaching”
3
Photo-elastic particles (1)
Particles from photo-elastic (birefringent) material:
Place object between two crossed circular polarizers
Light splits, has phase difference index of refraction varies
Visualizes stress (quantitatively) in sample
From: Prof. Bob Behringer, Duke University
7
Packing fraction – revised (1)
Ordered close packing (ocp):
Idealized perfect packing
Random close packing (rcp):
Statistical & empirical
experiments and simulations
Meta-stable packings:
Need to avoid crystallization, using bidisperse mixture
Initial state needs great care
Thinnest regular packing: = 0.5236 (lowest # neighbors)
Loose random packing: = 0.59 – 0.60 (dropped or packed)
Close random packing: = 0.625 – 0.641 (vibrating bed)
Thickest regular packing: = 0.7405 (crystallization)
Cannonballs in fcc
8
Packing fraction – revised (2)
Packing fraction of a disperse granular mixture
Consider mixture of two sizes of spheres, Rl & Rs,
Assume close random packing: = max = 0.64
Total volume fraction: b = l + s
Fraction of large particles: l = Ml/(Ms+Ml)
1st case: Ml >> Ms = max/l
2nd case: Ml << Ms
= max/(1 - l (1- max))
From: Les Milieux Granulaires, O. Pouliquen
9
Packing fraction – revised (3)
Idealized case: 2D Apollonian gasket
Contains ever decreasing spheres sizes
Ideal packing fraction: = 1
Practical case: high
performance concrete
Sizes over several orders
of magnitude
Very high packing fraction:
= 0.90
From: http://www.mathworks.com/
10
Packing fraction – revised (4)
Tapping increases density:
Sinusoidal taps:
amplitude A
duration T
peak acceleration: ~ A/T2
Main conclusions:
Energy injected is driving
mechanism
Control parameter is:
T ~ A/T
From: Dijksman & van Hecke, EPL, 2009
11
Force chains
Force chains:
“Highways” along which force travels
Inactive “rattlers” in between
Highly concentrated internal stress
Chain separation: ~ 5 grains
Evolving over time:
Not reproducible
Continuous alteration
Increasing stress: additional
force chains light up
From: Prof. Bob Behringer, Duke University
12
Focus: Janssen effect in a silo (1)
Discharge of a cylindrical bucket/hopper:
Water Bernoulli predicts P = f(z):
Grains Janssen predicts P ≠ f(z):
14
Transmission of force (1)
Distribution of forces upon loading external force:
Forces are unbounded higher loads than average loads
not a perfect lattice
Forces fall off exponentially fluctuations not arbitrary
large not a fractal network
Probability “P(w)” that force “w” occurs
Strong forces near
cylinder wall
Inhomogeneity packing
unequal distribution
forces
From: Liu, Nagel, et al., Science, 1995
15
Transmission of force (2)
Nature of force transmission:
Down a regular lattice?
Shared equally below?
Continuum description?
16
Transmission of force (3)
Figures from a presentation online by Bob Behringer, Duke University
Nature of transmission:
Ordered system (monodisperse disks
in hexagonal packing):
propagation through lattice
hyperbolic
17
Transmission of force (4)
Figures from a presentation online by Bob Behringer, Duke University
Nature of transmission:
Disordered system (pentagonal disks
in disordered packing):
classical elasticity
elliptic
Similar to a solid sheet
18
Construction history matters (1)
Pressure under a pile of granular material:
Point pour:
Localized source
Uniform pour:
Homogeneous rain
Explanation:
Flexure of base is not an issue
Geometry of contacts due to force chains are!
From: Vanel, et al., PRE, 1999
19
Construction history matters (2)
Humidity-induced aging:
For higher humidity and longer time
grains become more consolidated
For longer time and stress under an angle
grains become more consolidated
Explanation:
Liquid-induced cohesion & creep
From: Bocquet, et al., CR Physique 3, 2002
20
Angle of repose (1)
Methods to measure angle of repose:
“material on verge of sliding”
Funnel (point-source)
Tilting box
Rotating cylinder: Dynamic angle of repose
Static angle of repose
21
Angle of repose (2)
Physical interpretation:
Static angle of repose due to cohesive forces
related to friction coefficient: s = arctan(s)
Dynamic angle of repose due to dilatation and # of contacts
difference (s - d) is “dilation angle”
Characteristic values:
Angular grains (e.g. sand, gravel):
s 40°
Rounded grains (e.g. ballotini):
s 25°
From: Santamarina & Cho, Proc. Skempton Conf., 2004
22
Angle of repose (3)
Effect of reduced gravity (e.g. on Mars: a = 0.1 g):
Static angle increases: s, 0.1g = s, 1g + 5°
Dynamic angle decreases: d, 0.1g = d, 1g - 10°
Dilation angle & mobility of flow increase!
Low slopes on Mars can create large dry granular flows!
From: Kleinhans, et al., JGR, 2011 Dundas, et al., GRL, 2010