access to alcohol outlets and alcohol consumption: findings from viclanes professor anne kavanagh...
TRANSCRIPT
Access to Alcohol Outlets and Alcohol Consumption:
Findings from VicLANES
Professor Anne Kavanagh & Lauren KrnjackiCentre for Women’s Health, Gender & Society
Melbourne School of Population Health, University of Melbourne
Alcohol and harm
• Health and social problems
– Binge drinking
– Long term / chronic use
• Individual risk factors
– Male
– Young
– Lower socio-economic status
Alcohol environment
• Environmental risk factors
– Many outlets a problem?
• Reduce access Reduce consumption?
– National Alcohol Strategy
– Need further research to support this
What has been done?
• Internationally:
– Most studies from U.S.
– Alcohol related problems
– Mixed results
What has been done?
• Local evidence:
– Studied areas in Melbourne over time
– More outlets more harms in the area
– What happens to individuals?
Research question
• Does access to outlets close to home increase harmful alcohol consumption?
– Focus on bottle shops
– Focus on consumption
• How many outlets are a problem?
– Threshold effect?
VicLANES
• Conducted in Melbourne in late 2003
• Surveyed 4,500 people
• Investigated health behaviours
VicLANES
Data collection
• Individuals– Postal survey
– Valid response from 2349
• Outlets– List from Liquor Licensing Vic
– Audit to confirm location
Alcohol access
Number of outlets
•0
•1
• 2
• 3 - 4
• 5 - 7
• 8 or more
•1km radius
•1km network
•Outlet
•Home
Alcohol consumption
NHMRC Alcohol guidelines:
•Binge drinking (one session)– 6+ drinks for men / 4+ drinks for women
•Chronic drinking (weekly)– 29+ drinks for men / 15+ drinks for women
Alcohol consumption
Calculations
• Model: number of outlets and consumption?
• Controlled for the effect of:– Individual differences (age, income, gender)
– Area difference (wealth, distance from CBD)
– Able to isolate the effect of outlets on consumption
Results
Results
Interpretation
• More alcohol outlets risk of binge drinking
• Policy advice:– No more that ‘x’ outlets near a household?
• Restrict outlets based on:– Population density?
– Not more than ‘x’ distance from another outlet
Policy examples
• U.S. - Restrict licenses per capita
• U.K. - Alcohol disorder zones higher fees
• Locally - Assess cumulative impact
Recommendations
• Policy– Reduce or limit number of stores
– Evaluation of policy initiatives
• Research– Further research other licensed premises
– Further research to examine the impact of price
Acknowledgements
• Funding: VicHealth
• Principal Investigator VicLANES: Anne Kavanagh
• Chief Investigators on VicLANES: Gavin Turrell, Damien Jolley, David Crawford, Susan Donath
• Co-authors: Anne Kavanagh, Rebecca Bentley, Mary Kelly, Lukar Thornton, S. V. Subramanian
• Project Manager: Tanya King